23
North Dakota Pilot GPS Project Presenter: Judy L. Froseth Lory Harsche

North Dakota Pilot GPS Project

  • Upload
    shima

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

North Dakota Pilot GPS Project. Presenter: Judy L. Froseth Lory Harsche. The Problem:. Crash location information has been maintenance intensive and difficult to code. Engineering staff has expressed concerns with these problems. GPS Pilot Objectives:. Collection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • North Dakota Pilot GPS ProjectPresenter: Judy L. Froseth Lory Harsche

  • The Problem:Crash location information has been maintenance intensive and difficult to code. Engineering staff has expressed concerns with these problems.

  • GPS Pilot Objectives:CollectionEnsure the data format is accepted and usableTest data entry screens for data acceptabilityTest data retrieval to ensure proper formatEnsure data collection is simplifiedEasy use of GPS unitsQuality instructions provided to the officers

  • GPS Pilot Objectives:Collection (continued)Collect 500-750 crash reports with GPS dataEnsure significant quality of crash reports in pilot Review the handwritten data format for correctness Ensure GPS unit provides data consistent with data standard Check GPS unit configuration options for consistency Ensure data is collected when the GPS unit has a strong signal lock

  • GPS Pilot Objectives:Collection (continued)Collect law enforcement officers feedback Discuss GPS use, function, performance, questions, issues

  • GPS Pilot Objectives:UseImport/export crash data into a GIS system for analysis, testing and review Provide the system with GPS and crash report data Review the export/import process for efficiency, make changesUse electronic and paper node maps to compare GPS and node point location data Provide feedback to officers

  • GPS Pilot Objectives:Use (continued)Have experts examine the data results to ensure data meets accuracy requirements, is consistently collected and is usable Assemble the panel of experts Determine what is required to analyze the data Review the analysis, make recommendations to correct problems Discuss statewide implementation

  • GPS Pilot:Revise the MVCR form to provide space for GSP coordinates Required close communication between:Traffic SafetyPlanning and ProgrammingInformation TechnologyForm was revised and printed in December 2001

  • GSP Pilot:Two law enforcement agencies:

    Bismarck Police Department in January 2002 Cass County Sheriffs Office in February 2002

  • GSP Pilot:GPS Units: Magellan Meridian GPS at $235 each

  • GSP Pilot:GPS Units:Garmin eTrex Legend at $265 each

  • GSP Pilot:How did officers view this extra duty?As part of the crash data collection process to provide more accurate data Collection of GPS data became part of their daily routineWhich GPS units were preferred?All officers preferred the Megellan, based on ease of reading the numbers

  • GSP Pilot:GPS Unit: Magellan Meridian GPS at $235 each

  • GSP Pilot:How has the durability been?There have been no known issues What have been the pitfalls/problems? GPS units provide a continuously reading number Officer must select the 5th decimal digit from a fluctuating readout The 5th decimal represents roughly 1-5 feet of change

  • GSP Pilot:Have officers reported difficulty receiving signals/getting a reading?One crash report indicated a reading was not possible due to heavy rains Officers are not returning to the scene when the report is completed elsewhere

  • GSP Pilot:What is the battery life?Battery life depends on frequency of use Bismarck PD uses about 2 sets per month Cass County used original batteries for over 4months

  • Technical Field Accuracy Comparison:Manufacturers specifications on accuracy: Magellan Meridian GPS WAAS enabled up to 3 meter accuracy Garmin eTrex Legend 3 Meters 95%, 15 Meters 5%

  • Technical Field Accuracy Comparison:Field Accuracy Test ComparisonBased on 5 random locations near the Bismarck Capitol Tests were performed in a side by side comparison mid-day June 5th Trimbal Pro/XRS GPS unit was used as the comparison

  • Technical Field Accuracy Comparison:Radial difference in feet from the point identified by the Trimbal:

    Maximum Minimum Average Magellan52 feet16 feet24.8 feet Garmin36 feet1 foot16.2 feet

  • Data Collection/Preliminary Results:As of July 26, 2002, 300 total crashes have included GPS dataAbout 30% of crashes reported by the 2agencies have GPS coordinates Initial analysis identified data collection/entry errors, requires a check A non-labor intensive checkpoint process is being worked out