NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION List of …mcdonline.gov.in/departmentdocs/Stg. Committee meeting dt...Last date of submission of Technical/ Financial bids was extended i.e. 16-12-2011

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

List of Business to be transacted at the Meeting of the

Standing Committee to be held on

Wednesday, the 3rd July , 2013 at 2:00 p.m.

at Satya Narayan Bansal Sabhagar,2nd Floor, A-Wing, Dr. S.P.Mukherjee Civic Centre,

New Delhi.

Item No Subject ____________________________________________________________________________

‘PART A’ POSTPONED CASES

20 Final Report of Third Municipal Valuation Committee. (i)Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/A&C/NDMC/13/C&C dated 14.6.2012. (ii)Resolution No.6 of the Standing Committee dated 27.6.2012. (iii)Resolution No.3 of the Special (High Powered property Tax) Committee

dated 19.3.2013. (iv) Constitution of Sub-Committee in the meeting dated 5.6.2013

41 Appointment of Independent Consultant [IC] to independently monitor the work of the

Public Private Partnership Project in Collection, Segregation, Transportation & Delivery of MSW in 6 MCD Zones i.e. Karol Bagh Zone, City Zone, Sadar Pahar Ganj Zone, West Zone , Central Zone & South Zone.

(i) Commissioner letter No.F33/DEMS/NDMC/432/C&C dt. 14.01.2013. (ii) Resolution No. 3 of DEMS committee dt. 14.05.2013.

NEW CASES

50 Promotion to the post of Senior Audit Officer in the Pay Band 3:Rs.15600-39100 with Grade Pay Rs. 5400/- on regular basis.

MCA’s letter No.MCA/Admn./PCA/3-32/Vol.II/2041 dated 11.6.2013 51 Condemnation and auction of Municipal Vehicles and unserviceable parts of Rohini

Zone Auto Workshop under North Delhi Municipal Corporation Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/DEMS/NDMC/996/C&C dated 14.6.2013

PART-B

94 Promotion of Asstt. Audit Officers in the Pay Band 2: Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Pay . 4800/- to the post of Audit Officer in the Pay Band2: Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay Rs. 5400/- on regular basis.

MCA’s letter No.MCA/Admn./PCA/3-162/2071 dated 21.6.2013

PLACED ON TABLE

95 Development works in approved colony SH(1) Stg. of road by pdg. Bituminous mastic from Banglow Road to Aggarsen Chowk in Kamla Ngar in C-69/CLZ(2) Stg. of Road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Aggarsen Chowk to GT Road in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ (3) Stg. of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from D1 to Bhatia Chowk and D-30 to Mandelia Road in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ (4) Stg. of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from 4A to 84A and 36A to 112A in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ (5) Stg. of Road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Mandelia Road to Kohlapur road and adjoining roads in F-Block in Kamla Nagar in C-60/CLZ.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./NDMC/1082/C&C dated 1.7.2013

96 Development works in approved colony (1) Imp. Dev. of land by pdg. RCC Box Drain from 5 to 29 D in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ (2) Imp../dev. of lane by pdg. RMC from 5 to 29D in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ.


97 Imp. Dev. of strengthing of road from Kunji Lal Halwai to Indira Market H.No.3450 H.No.4097 & H.No.3519 to H.No.3342 Aryapura by pdg. Mastic in Malka Ganj Ward No.9/CLZ.


98 Imp. & Dev. of drainage system of 30’ ROW roads in Avtar Enclave & A5B SFS Flats, Shanti Kunj, Paschim Vihar in Rohini Zone.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./NDMC/1074/C&C dated 28,6.2013

PART-C

10 Construction of Community Hall on the remaining land of Bara Hindu Rao Dispensary after constructing Poly Clinic.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/CTP/NDMC/1089/C&C dated 3.7.2013

PART ‘A’

POSTPONED CASES

Item No. 41 :— Appointment of Independent Consultant (IC) to independently monitorthe work of the Public Private Partnership Project in Collection,Segregation, Transportation & Delivery of MSW in 6 MCD Zones i.e.Karol Bagh Zone, City Zone, Sadar Pahar Ganj Zone, West Zone, CentralZone & South Zone.

(i) Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/DEMS/NDMC/432/C&C dated 14-1-2013.

For improving the Solid Waste Management Services in the GNCTD, the MCD in pursuant toSection 201 of the DMC Act, 1957 (amended upto date), upon receipt of authorization from StandingCommittee/Corporation in the form of Resolution No. 322/434, 314/431 and 313/430 respectively, hasalready implemented the work of “Public Private Partnership Project on Design, Procure, Renovate,Operate, Maintain and Transfer (DPROMT) basis, to carry out the functions of collection, segregation,Transportation and Delivery of Municipal Solid Waste in Six MCD Zones namely Karol Bagh Zone, CityZone, Sadar Pahar Ganj Zone, West Zone, Central Zone & South Zone, since the year 2005. Theaforesaid PPP Project at present is in operation in MCD Zones namely Karol Bagh Zone, City Zone,Sadar Pahar Ganj Zone, West Zone, Central Zone & South Zone (main project) through following privateconcessionaires. The jurisdiction of each private concessionaire is defined as here below :—

> Delhi Waste Management (P) Ltd. : South, Central & City Zone> A.G. Enviro Infra Projects (P) Ltd. : K.B. Zone & S.P. Zone> Metro Waste Handling (P) Ltd. : West Zone

As provided for in the concession Agreement Article 4, an Independent Consultant is to beappointed by MCD for the purpose of monitoring of the project. The term of earlier appointed IndependentConsultant, has already been expired. The role and activities of the Independent Consultant are detailedout in the Concession Agreement and RFP of this work. The Independent Consultant is to be appointedthrough an Open bid process.

Accordingly, for appointment of New Independent Consultant, RFP was invited vide No.E.E.(DEMS)P&M/2011-12/RFP-01 dated 13-10-2011 with last date of download/purchase of RFP upto8-11-2011 which was later extended upto 28-11-2011 with the approval of Competent Authority. Widepublicity was given through National Newspaper and MCD website, the detail of publication in Newspaperis as follow :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Date of Publication1. The Hindu (All India Editions) 20-10-20112. Times of India (All India Editions) 20-10-20113. Hindustant Times (Delhi) 20-10-20114. Hindustant Times (Hindi) (Delhi) 20-10-20115. The Mint (Delhi) 20-10-20116. Dainik Jagran (All India Editions) 20-10-20117. The Daily Milap (Urdu) (Delhi) 20-10-20118. Daily Educator (Punjabi) (Delhi) 20-10-2011

[ 2 (N) ]

Four bidders purchased RFP documents and raised certain queries in Pre-bid meeting, held on28-11-2011 at 3-00 PM, which were later duly replied with the permission/approval of CompetentAuthority and agreed suggestions were incorporated in the RFP. Last date of submission of Technical/Financial bids was extended i.e. 16-12-2011 upto 3-00 PM. Technical bids of following bidders wereopened on 16-12-2011 at 3-01 PM :———————————————————————————————————————————

S. Name of Firm Tender Cost/G.8 Earnest Money/G.8 No.No. No./Date No./Date

——————————————————————————————————————————1. M/s. MSV International Inc. Rs. 5,000/-, 11044 Rs. 2,00,000/-, 11063,

dt. 3-11-2011 dt. 16-12-2011

2. M/s. AECOM India Pvt. Ltd. Rs. 5,000/-, 11055 Rs. 2,00,000/-, 11062,dt. 21-11-2011 dt. 16-12-2011

3. M/s. Deccan Consulting Rs. 5,000/-, 11045 Rs. 2,00,000/-, 11064,Engineers Pvt. Ltd. dt. 8-11-2011 dt. 16-12-2011

4. M/s. Consulting Engineers Rs. 5,000/-, 11056 Rs. 2,00,000/-, 11061Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. dt. 28-11-2011 dt. 16-12-2011

——————————————————————————————————————————

After Technical Evaluations of the bids received, following bidders were found technicallyqualified and after approval of Competent Authority, their financial bids were opened on 20-3-2012, thedetail of which is as follow :———————————————————————————————————————————

S. No. Name of Firm Quoted Rates (For 36 Months)——————————————————————————————————————————

1. M/s. MSV International Inc. [L1] Rs. 2,48,18,400/- inclusive of everything exceptthe Service Tax.

2. M/s. Deccan Consulting Engineers Rs. 3,00,24,000/- inclusive of everything exceptPvt. Ltd. [L2] the Service Tax.

3. M/s. Consulting Engineers Services Rs. 4,32,27,000/- inclusive of everything except(India) Pvt. Ltd. [L3] the Service Tax.

——————————————————————————————————————————

M/s. MSV International Inc. is the lowest bidder [Ll] and its quoted rates is Rs. 2,48,18,400/-(Rs. two crore forty eight lacs eighteen thousand & four hundred only) inclusive of everything except theService Tax.

Justification of rates calculated and duly checked by SW/DEMS works out to beRs. 2,15,15,580/- (Rs. two crore fifteen lacs fifteen thousand five hundred & eighty only) inclusive ofeverything except the Service Tax. As the justified rates are lower than the lowest quoted rates i.e.Rs. 2,48,18,400/-, M/s. MSV International Inc. was called for negotiation vide letter No. 171/EE/DEMS/P&M/2012-13 dated 3-4-2012, so as to bring their rates within the ambit of justified rates.

Negotiations were held on 4-4-2012 at 12-00 Noon in the chamber of C.E.(DEMS)-II and inthe presence of C.E.(DEMS)-II, S.E.(DEMS)-III, A.C.A. (DEMS), Acctt.(DEMS)P&M&T.C.(DEMS)P&M and where M/s. MSV International reduced its rates finally amounting to Rs. 2,15,00,000/- +Service Tax as applicable. Now the rates are reasonable and are recommended for acceptance ofCompetent Authority.

[ 3 (N) ]

The initial term of the Independent Consultant shall be 3 years or actual date of termination ofmain project (whichever is earlier). The term may be renewed/extended for a period not exceeding2 years at a time.

Although integrated tender has been invited in the erstwhile MCD for monitoring the work ofthe Public Private Partnership Project in Collection, Segregation, Transportation & Delivery of MSW inerstwhile 6 MCD Zones i.e. Karol Bagh Zone, City Zone, Sadar Pahar Ganj Zone, West Zone, CentralZone & South Zone, now since the erstwhile MCD has been trifurcated and K.B. Zone, S.P. Zone & CityZone falls in N.D.M.C. jurisdiction and West Zone, Central Zone & South Zone in S.D.M.C. jurisdiction,therefore separate agreements needs to be done by respective corporations for paying fee to shortlistedL1 bidder proportionately on the basis of No. of wards falling in respective corporations.

Accordingly, proposal was submitted before Commissioner/NDMC and Commissioner/SDMCfor approval and the same was accorded. Now the approved revised conditions for entering into contractwith L1 bidder (M/s. MSV International Inc.) shall be as follow :—

1. Separate agreement with the L1 bidder shall be done by NDMC and SDMC in theproportion given below. However letter of intent (LOI) shall be issued by NDMC :

L1 bidder M/s. MSV International reduced its rates finally amounting to Rs. 2,15,00,000/-+ Service Tax as applicable, for 36 Months. The contract fees is to be shared byCorporation and the private concessionaire in 50:50 proportions (50% jointly by respectiveCorporation: 50% by private concessionaire M/s. DWM 25%, M/s. AG Enviro : 16.67%and M/s. Metro Waste 8.33%).

Total rate of L1 bidder for 36 months = Rs. 2,15,00,000/- + Service Tax

Total rate of L1 bidder for 01 month = Rs. 2,15,00,000/- ÷ 36 + ServiceTax= Rs. 5,97,222/- + Service Tax

50% joint share of NDMC & SDMC = 5,97,222 ÷ 2 = 2,98,611/- + Service Tax

Proportionate fee per ward = 2,98,611÷117 = Rs. 2552.23 + Service Tax

Therefore proportionate share of NDMC & SDMC shall be :—

NDMC share = 36 wards @ Rs. 2552.23 = Rs. 91880.28 per month

Say Rs. 91,880/- + Service Tax for One Month

Or

Rs. 33,07,680/- for Three Years

SDMC share = 81 wards @ Rs. 2,552.23 = Rs. 2,06,730.63 per month

Say Rs. 2,06,731/- + Service Tax for one month

Or

Rs. 74,42,316/- for Three Years

[ 4 (N) ]

2. All other provision in the tender condition, such as taking performance security etc.from the proposed L1 bidder, shall also be proportionately divided as 30.77% and69.23% between NDMC & SDMC respectively :

The L1 bidder has given his consent for entering into a separate agreement with both theMunicipal Corporation namely, North Delhi Municipal Corporation and South Delhi Municipal Corporationvide letter No. MSV/PRJ/MCD/2012-13569 dated 22-8-2012.

Ll bidder has further agreed to extend the validity of his rates upto 28-2-2013.

The matter was place before Finance Department and observations of Finance Departmentdated 18-4-2012, alongwith replies is as follows :———————————————————————————————————————————S. No. Observation Reply

——————————————————————————————————————————1. Department to certify that :— It is certified that :—

(a) Work will be completed as per prevalent (a) Work will be completed as per prevalentrules and regulations and estimate has rules and regulations and estimate has beenbeen prepared with due care and no prepared with due care and no variationvariation from the estimate is permitted. from the estimate is permitted.

(b) Certificates as specified in Annexure-II (b) Needful will be done.of the new scrutiny proforma is placed infile by the department. Department mayincorporate all these certificates in theapproval for Rate and Agency.

(c) The proposed work is/has not been (c) The proposed work is/has not beenundertaken by any other agency or under undertaken by any other agency or underany other Head of A/c. any other Head of A/c

(d) The information as required under the (d) The information as required under theRTI Act will be displayed. RTI Act will be displayed.

(e) Full work as envisaged in the A/A & E/S (e) Full work as envisaged in the A/A & E/Shas been taken in the instant proposal. has been taken in the instant proposal.

(f) Overall expenditure under the scheme (f) Overall expenditure under the schemewill be kept within the amount of the will be kept within the amount of thesanctioned scheme. sanctioned scheme.

(g) Rates of instant proposal are not higher (g) No such case of similar work undertakenthan that of similar wok undertaken in the in the zone/division in recent past to thezone/division in recent past. best knowledge of this office.

(h) Contractual amount be restricted to Rs. (h) Contractual amount be restricted to Rs.Rs. 215.00 lacs + S.T. as applicable. 215.00 lacs + S.T. as applicable.

2. Documents regarding evaluation of Technical Needful done as technical evaluation has beenproposal (157/c) is not signed by the S.E. & approved by CE (DEMS) & SE (DEMS) at pageC.E. (DEMS). 11/N.

[ 5 (N) ]

3. Following may be furnished :

(a) A/A & E/S. (a) The MCD Standing Committee/Corporationresolved vide Resolution No. 322/434, 314/431 and 313/430 to invite private sectorparticipation on Design, Procure, Renovate,Operate, Maintain and Transfer (DPROMT)basis, to carry out the function to collection,segregation, transportation and delivery ofMunicipal Solid Waste in Six MCD Zones,namely, South, Central, City, K.B., S.P. andWest.

As provided for in the concession AgreementArticle 4, an Independent Consultant is tobe appointed by MCD for the purpose ofmonitoring of the project.

(b) Period of contract of three Pvt. (b) Period of contract of three Pvt.Concessionaire. Concessionaire is of 9 years w.e.f. year

2005.

(c) Technical sanction. (c) Same as on (a) above.

(d) Budget slip. (d) Budget slip attached.

(e) ZAO booking. (e) The case has been checked by SW andthere is no provision in DEMS Deptt. tobook the estimate in the office of SW.

(f) Planning booking (f) The case has been checked by SW andthere is no provision in DEMS Deptt. tobook the estimate in the office of SW.

(g) FTC sheet. (g) FTC sheet attached.

(h) Date of validity of rates. (h) Rates are valid 30-11-2012.

(i) Date of termination of earlier contract. (i) Date of expiry of earlier contract of I.C. isApril, 2010.

(j) Performance of consultant in earlier (j) Performance of consultant in earlier contractcontract. was satisfactory as per report of Zonal

E.E.(DEMS) of erstwhile MCD, lookingafter the work of concessionaires.

(k) Benefits achieved during earlier contract. (k) Department was able to monitor the projectefficiently.

(l) Whether there is any issue unresolved of (l) Final payment of earlier contract is yet toearlier contract. be made.

[ 6 (N) ]

4. It is evident from 18/c of part file II that earlier Open bid has been invited in this tender throughcontract was awarded to the same firm wide publicity in leading newpapers on all IndiaM/s. MSV International for Rs. 1,07,96,400/- + basis alongwith on MCD website and accordinglyST for three years. Department is advised to L1 bidder has been selected. However, quotedget the rates reduced through negotiation in the rates of L1 bidder has been further negotiatedinterest of the Corporation. and now L1 bidder has reduced its rates

substantially vis-a-vis jutified rate cllculated byDeptt.

5. Reasons for disqualifying one firm needs Reasons for disqualifying one firm has beenclarification. clarified on page 157/c.

6. JOR may be checked by the Planning JOR has been checked by Planning DepartmentDepartment. of DEMS and the sarne is placed opposite at

page 181/c.

7. Expenditure sharing between MCD & Needful shall be done.concessionaire is included in D/preamble butnot in proposal note.

——————————————————————————————————————————

The further observations of Finance Department dated 7-9-2012, alongwith replies is asfollows :———————————————————————————————————————————S. No. Observation Reply

——————————————————————————————————————————1. The reason for not going for online tender The RFP document of this case has been approved

process in the instant case may be explained & by Commissiorer of erstwhile MCD on pagejustified. 59/N of file No. 2, which has provision for nanual

submission of bids. Moreover the RFP documenthas also been vetted by Finance Deptt. on page51/N of file No. 2.

2. If approval of competent authority has been Same as above.obtained for waive of online tender process,the copy of the same may be placed on recordalong with necessary clarifications.

3. As per article 4.1 (page-63/C of file No. 2) Since the department has nvited open bids throughMCD shall prior to execution of this agreement, wide publicity where infinite numbers of bidderscall for financial bids from at least 5 persons, could participate, therefore the said condition hasbut only 4 bidders have quoted their rates. been satisfied. The above fact has been approvedPlease clarify. by Addl. Commissioner (DEMS) on page

10-11/N.

4. All the members have not signed on Evaluation In this case Technical Committee has not beenTechnical Proposal (P-157/C). Please clarify. formed. However the technical evaluation done

by division has been vetted and approved by S.E.(DEMS), C.E. (DEMS), D-in-C &. Addl. Comm.(DEMS) on page 11/N.

[ 7 (N) ]

5. During the earlier tenure of I.C., the then The referred said comments of E-in-C/SDMCE-in-C stated that “the performance of IC has been over ruled by Commissioner/SDMC onwas very dismal & ineffective and was of the page 22/N and 23/N and finally E-in-C/SDMCopinion that in future the monitoring of the work cleared the proposal on page 23/N. However it isof Drivate concessionaires in 6 zones shall be pertinent to mention that Corporation will alsocarried out through the departmental staff deploy departmental staff for monitoring of projectwhich would also help in reducing the allegation along with prospective Independent Consultant.of irregularities”. Please clarify.

6. The deptt. should ensure that the role & It will be ensured that role & scope of servicesscope of services of the IC should be as per the of IC would be as per the instructions/directionsinstructions/directions set out in schedule-F. set out in schedule-F along with additional

conditions given in this RFP and main concessionagreernent.

7. Deptt. may certify/ensure that : It is certify/ensured that :

(a) Overall expenditure on the work including (a) Overall expenditure on the work includingall its components should be confined all its components should be confined withinwithin the cost of approved scheme. the cost of approved scheme.

(b) Guidelines, instructions, norms, ceiling limits, (b) Guidelines, instructions, norms, ceiling limits,other conditions etc., as prescribed by the other conditions etc., as prescribed by theGNCTD/other competent authority from GNCTD/other competent authority from timetime to time with regard to the execution of to time relevant with this project with regardworks under this plan scheme are followed. to the execution of works under this plan

scheme will be followed.

(c) The contractor is not blacklisted or (c) The contractor is not blacklisted or otherwiseotherwise debarred from tendering in debarred from tendering in MCD as perMCD. record available.

(d) The proposal is technically feasible, (d) The proposal is technically feasible,economically viable and in the larger economically viable and in the larger interestinterest of then local public. of the local public and has been initiated

after having been approved by CompetentAuthority.

(e) The proposal is as per laid down norms/ (e) The proposal is as per laid down norms/criteria etc. criteria etc. and has been initiated after

having been approved by CompetentAuthority.

(f) The proposal is strictly as per the approved (f) The proposal is strictly as per the approvedspecification. specification and has been initiated after

having been approved by CompetentAuthority.

(g) The proposal is strictly as per the NIT (g) The proposal is as per the NIT terms &terms & conditions of the deptt. conditions of the deptt. and has been initiated

after having been approved by CompetentAuthority.

[ 8 (N) ]

(h) The proposal is entirely in accordance (h) The proposal is largeiy in accordance withwith the salient points laid down under the salient points laid down under articlearticle 4 of concession agreement. 4 of concession agreement and has been

initiated efter having been approved byCompetent Authority.

8. LPP may be mentioned. In the recent past, no such similar type work hasbeen awarded in DEMS. Therefore LastPurchase Price (LPP) is not possible to mention.However, the price of earlier IC contract awardedin year 2005 is Rs. 1,07,96,400 + S.T. for threeyears are 2,99,900 + S.T. per month.

——————————————————————————————————————————


——————————————————————————————————————————1. Commissioner, SDMC has only approved M/s. MSV International Inc. was appointed

engagement of IC and has not approved as independent consultant in the year 2005engagement of IC if its performance was poor. vide erstwhile MCD Resolution No. 137 datedDepartment may please state the name of IC 18-5-2005. Keeping in view the changedwhose performance was dismal. At any stage circumstances, Commissioner of erstwhile MCDwas M/s. MSV International engaged ? If yes approved to float the revised RFP on 28-9-2011,was its performance good. having stringent revised terms and conditions to

plug the loophole in the earlier agreement, forengaging new Independent consultant. After opencompetitive bidding at All India level, M/s. MSVInternational Inc. has now again emerges L1.

M/s. MSV International Inc. has enclosedperformance certificate with regard to its earliercontract with MCD in the year 2005 for thesame above project, on page 28 of its technicalproposal bid and the same is placed opposite.As per this, Director-In-Chief of erstwhile MCDhas given satisfactory performance report ofM/s. MSV International Inc. vide letter No. 344/DNC/DEMS/2011 dated 30-11-2011.

Commissioner/SDMC has also on page 22/N and23/N observed inter alia.

“As regards performance of past IC, I remember,we had tried to plug the loopholes experiencedearlier in framing the T & C. Proposal at 21/N isagreed”.

——————————————————————————————————————————

[ 9 (N) ]


——————————————————————————————————————————1. It was evident from the file that MSV M/s. MSV International has been technically qualified

International is the only independent based on the requisite RFP documents and satisfactoryconsultant engaged by the MCD so far, performance certificate dated 30-11-2011 given bythe work performance of which was not the then D-in-C The same was approved by thefound satisfactory by the then E-in-C Competent Authority on page 11/N and 16/N. Thedated 10-7-2012 at page 22/N which is observations of E-in-C dated 10-7-2012 at page 22/Ncontradictory to the performance certificate is subsequent to M/s. MSV International emergesgiven to the firm by the then D-in-C L-1 (Lowest Bidder). However, E-in-C on pagedated 30-11-2011. Considering the 23/N has agreed to the proposal of NDMC and hasnon-performance of the above IC, the advised to have separate agreement with both thedepartment could have debarred the corporations and further asked to have the consentconcerned firm at the first instance but so of bidder. M/s. MSV Internatioral has given its consentand department still recommending the for entering into a separate agreement with both thesame contractor. corporations namely NDMC & SDMC. Accordingly

the case is being processed.2. It is pertinent to mention that the The Commissioner, SDMC at page 22/N & 23/N

Commissioner, SDMC at page 22/N & has approved the proposal of NDMC at page 21/N23/N has only approved the engagement of where it has been clearly mentioned that L-l bidder isIC and has not approved the engagement M/s. MSV International.of IC, if the work performance was poor.

3. Since most of the wards i.e. 81 wards out Since this is an integrated project and has been initiatedof 117 wards pertain to SDMC, it would be by the DEMS of erstwhile unified MCD and now theappropriate if the instant case be processed concerned office comes under NDMC and thereforein SDMC. accordingly case is being processed from NDMC.

However, after the LOI (Letter of Intent) issued byNDMC, there would be separate agreement with theagency by the NDMC & SDMC.

——————————————————————————————————————————

Expenditure shall be charge under the Head of Account XL-III-D-IV. Rates are valid upto28-2-2013.

Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.The case is put up before the Standing Committee through the DEMS Committee, for

authorizing the Commissioner to enter into concession agreement with M/s. MSV International Inc. for aperiod of 3 years or actual date of termination of main project (whichever is earlier) with a total fee ofRs. 2,15,00,000/- + Service Tax as applicable (36 × 5,97,222/- + applicable Service Tax) out of whichNorth Delhi Municipal Corporation & South Delhi Municipal Corporation shall pay Rs. 33,07,680/- +Service Tax for 36 months (36 × 91880 + S.T.) and Rs. 74,42,316/- + Service Tax for 36 months(36 × 206731 + S.T.) respectively i.e. 50% of Rs. 2,15,00,000/- (Rs. 1,07,50,000/- + Service Tax asapplicable) and remaining 50% alongwith applicable Service Tax shall be paid by three Concessionairesnamely M/s. Delhi Waste Management Ltd. (25%), M/s. AG Enviro Infra Projects (16.67%) andM/s. Metro Waste Handling (P) Ltd., (8.33%) as per the terms and conditions contained in the request forproposal document, in accordance, as required under Section 202-C of the DMC Act, 1957 as amendedupto date and also for the Administrative Approval and Expenditure Sanction of Standing Committee.

(ii) Resolution No. 3 of the DEMS Committee dated 14-5-2013.Resolved that it may be recommended to the Corporation through Standing Committee, that

the proposal as contained in Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/DEMS/NDMC/432/C&C dated 14-1-2013,be approved.

[ 10 (N) ]

NEW CASES

Item No. 50 :— Promotion to the Post of Senior Audit Officer in the Pay Band 3 :Rs. 15600-39100 with Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- on regular basis.

MCA’s letter No. MCA/Admn./PCA/3-32/Vol.-II/2041 dated 11-6-2013.

As per order issued by Secretary (UD) and Director of Local Bodies vide No. PS/Secy./UD/2012/Pt. 1/491-97 dated 18-4-2012, there are 21 posts in the Unified Cadre of Senior Audit Officer. As pernotified RRs for the post of Senior Audit Officer, two years regular service in the Cadre of Audit Officeris required for regular promotion as Senior Audit Officer. At present 17 officers are working as SeniorAudit Officer on regular basis.

North Delhi Municipal Corporation vide their Resolution No. 70 dated 3-9-2012(Annexure ‘A’) had approved the promotion/regularization of 9 Audit Officers as Senior Audit Officers inthe Pay Band 3 : Rs. 15600-39100 with Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- on regular basis w.e.f. 16-5-2012/date oftaking over the charge.

Besides these 9 Audit Officers, Sh. Rishi Ram Gupta, Senior Audit Officer (ad hoc) who wasat Sl. No. 3 (above Sh. Manoj Kant Bhatnagar at Sl. No. 4) was also considered for regularization tothe post of Senior Audit Officer. However, since one, out of two RDA Cases, was pending against him,in his case, the recommendation of DPC dated 16-5-2012 was kept in “Sealed Cover”. In the subsequentDPC held on 14-1-2013 the findings were again kept in ‘Sealed Cover’ as the one RDA against himwas still pending. The other 4 eligible Audit Officers were granted promotion as Senior Audit Officeras per approval of North Delhi Municipal Corporation vide their Resolution No. 272 dated 18-2-2013(Annexure ‘B’).

The Departmental inquiry proceedings of both the cases against Sh. Rishi Ram Gupta, SeniorAudit Officer (ad hoc) have now been completed and as per decision of the Disciplinary Authority he hasbeen fully exonerated in both the cases.

Para 17.6.1 of Chapter 3 of Swamy’s Compilation on Seniority and Promotion in CentralGovernment Service provides that ‘On the conclusion of the disciplinary case which results in dropping ofallegations against the Government Servant, the Sealed Cover or covers shall be opened. In case theGovernment Servant is completely exonerated, the due date of his promotion will be determined withreference to the position assigned to him in the findings kept in the Sealed Cover/Covers and withreference to the date of promotion of his next junior on the basis of such position.

Accordingly, the Sealed Cover dated 16-5-2012 has now been opened and as per findings keptin Sealed Cover, the DPC had recommended his case as ‘Fit for Promotion’ and he was assigned theposition above his next junior Sh. Manoj Kant Bhatnagar, Senior Audit Officer.

The Office of the Chief Auditor is still functioning as a combined Audit Office for North,South and East Delhi Municipal Corporations. Therefore, being the lead Corporation the North DelhiMunicipal Corporation through the Standing Committee of North Delhi Municipal Corporation may berequested to approve the promotion of Sh. Rishi Ram Gupta, Senior Audit Officer (ad hoc) in the PayBand 3 : Rs. 15600-39100 with Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- on regular basis with effect from 16-5-2012 i.e. thedate from which his immediate junior Sh. Manoj Kant Bhatnagar was promoted/regularized to that post.

This may be treated as an item of Urgent Business.

[ 11 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘A’

Copy of Resolution No. 70 of the Ordinary September (2012) Meeting of theNorth Delhi Municipal Corporation held on 30-9-2012

Urgent Business No. 12

Subject :— Promotion to the post of Senior Audit Officer in the Pay Band 3 : Rs. 15600-39100with Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- on regular basis.

(i) MCA’s letter No. MCA/Admn./PCA/3-32/Vol. II//266 dated 6-7-2012.

As per order issued by Secretary (UD) and Director of Local Bodies vide No. PS/Secy./UD/2012/Pt.1/491-97 dated 18-4-2012, there are 21 posts in the unified cadre of Senior Audit Officer. Atpresent seven officers are working as Senior Audit Officers on regular basis. As per notified RRs for thepost of Senior Audit Officer, two years’ regular service in the cadre of Audit Officer is required for regularpromotion as Senior Audit Officer.

The following 10 Audit Officers have completed two years regular service as Audit Officerand are eligible for promotion as Senior Audit Officers on regular basis :—

S. No. Name of the Officer

S/Shri/Smt.

1. Chander Kant Gupta

2. Naresh Kumar

3. Rishi Ram Gupta

4. Manoj Kant Bhatnagar

5. Santosh Gupta

6. Jitender Kumar Jindal

7. Shashi Kumar Bansal

8. Mahander Kumar

9. Neelam Kohli

10. Sukh Pal

The DPC in their meeting held on 16-5-2012 after considering the Annual ConfidentialReports/Annual Performance Appraisal Reports and other relevant records recommended the names of allthe above officers (except at Sl. No. 3 i.e. Sh. Rishi Ram Gupta) for promotion as Senior Audit Officer onregular basis in Pay Band 3 : Rs. 15600-39100 with Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/-. The DepartmentalPromotion Committee recommended that officers at Sl. No. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may be promoted w.e.f.the date of DPC i.e. 16-5-2012 as they are presently working as Senior Audit Officer on ad hoc basis andofficers at Sl. No. 9 and 10 may be promoted w.e.f. the date of taking over of the charge of the post ofSenior Audit Officer.

There is no RDA/Police case pending against any of the above officers except at Sl. No. 3i.e. Sh. Rishi Ram Gupta against whom one Departmental Inquiry is pending and in his case “SealedCover Procedure” has been adopted.

[ 12 (N) ]

The unified Corporation vide Resolution No. 774 dated 29-11-2010 had extended the term ofad hoc promotion of Sh. Shashi Kumar Bansal and Sh. Mahander Kumar, Senior Audit Officers up to15-10-2011. The extension beyond this date could not be obtained inadvertently which is regretted andconcerned officials have been suitably advised to not to let such lapses recur in future. Therefore,continuation of term of ad hoc promotion of Sh. Shashi Kumar Bansal and Sh. Mahander Kumar to thepost of Senior Audit Officer for the period from 16-10-2011 to 15-5-2012 is also to be granted.

Further the unified Corporation vide Resolution No. 72 dated 13-6-2011 had approved thecontinuation of ad hoc promotion of Shri Rishi Ram Gupta, Senior Audit Officer for the period 17-5-2011 to16-5-2012. Extension of ad hoc promotion to the post of Senior Audit Officer in respect of Sh. Rishi RamGupta is required for a further period of one year i.e. 17-5-2012 to 16-5-2013 or till the post is filled up onregular basis or till further orders, whichever is earlier.

The office of the Chief Auditor is still functioning as combined Audit Office for North, Southand East Delhi Municipal Corporations. Therefore, being the lead Corporation, the North Delhi MunicipalCorporation through the Standing Committee of North Delhi Municipal Corporation is requested to approvethe following proposals :—

(i) Promotion of the following Audit Officers as Senior Audit Officers in the Pay Band 3 :Rs. 15600-39100 with Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- on regular basis with effect from thedates mentioned against each :————————————————————————————————————Sl. No. Name of the Officer Date of Promotion

S/ShrijSmt.———————————————————————————————————

1. Chander Kant Gupta 16-5-2012

2. Naresh Kumar 16-5-2012

3. Manoj Kant Bhatnagar 16-5-2012

4. Santosh Gupta 16-5-2012

5. Jitender Kumar Jindal 16-5-2012

6. Shashi Kumar Bansal 16-5-2012

7. Mahander Kumar 16-5-2012

8. Neelam Kohli From the date of taking over the charge

9. Sukh Pal From the date of taking over the charge———————————————————————————————————

(ii) Extension of ad hoc promotion to the post of Senior Audit Officer in respect of Shri RishiRam Gupta for a further period of one year i.e. from 17-5-2012 to 16-5-2013 or till thepost is filled up on regular basis or till further orders, whichever is earlier.

(iii) Extension of the term of ad hoc promotion of Sh. Shashi Kumar Bansal and Sh. MahanderKumar to the post of Senior Audit Officer for the period from 16-10-2011 to 15-5-2012.

This may be treated as an item of Urgent Business.

(ii) Resolution No. 31 of the Standing Committee dated 25-7-2012.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the proposal of MCA as contained inhis letter No. MCA/Admn./PCA/3-32/Vol. II/266 dated 6-7-2012, be approved.

Resolution No. 70 Resolved that as recommended by the Standing Committee vide its ResolutionNo. 31 dated 25-7-2012 the proposal of MCA as contained in his letter No. MCA/Admn./PCA/3-32/Vol.II/266 dated 6-7-2012, be approved.

[ 13 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘B’

Copy of Resolution No. 272 of the Ordinary February (2013) Meeting of theNorth Delhi Municipal Corporation held on 18-2-2013

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF AUDITORNorth/South/East Delhi MunicipalCorporation, 27th Floor, Dr. S.P.M.,Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002.Ph.No. 011-23227704, 23227706

MCA/Admn./PCA/3-32/Vol.-II/811 Dated 15th January, 2013

From

The Municipal Chief Auditor,North, South & East Municipal Corporations of Delhi,27th Floor, Dr. S.P.M. Clvic Centre, J.L. Nehru Marg,New Delhi-110002.

To

The Mtunicipal Secretary,North Deihl Municipal Corporation,Dr. S.P.M.Civic Centre, J.L. Nehru Marg,New Delhi-110002.

Subject :— Promotion of Audit Officer to the post of Senior Audit Officer in the Pay Band 3 :15600-39100 with Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- on regular basis.

(i) MCA’s letter No. MCA/Admn./PCA/3-32/Vol. II//811 dated 15-1-2013.

As per order issued by Secretary (UD) and Director of Local Bodies vide No. PS/Secy./UD/2012/Pt.I/491-97 dated 18-4-2012, there are 21 posts in the cadre of Senior Audit Officer. At present 14officers are working as Senior Audit Officers on regular basis and 1 otficer is working as Senior AuditOfficer on ad hoc basis due to pendency of one Departmental Enquiry case against him. As per notifiedRRs for the post of Senior Audit Officer, two years’ regular service in the cadre of Audit Officer isrequired for regular promotion as Senior Audit Officer.

The following 5 Officers have completed two years regular service as Audit Officer and areeligible for promotion as Senior Audit officer on regular basis :—

S/Sh./Smt.

1. Rishi Ram Gupta — Sr. Audit Officer on Ad hoc basis

2. Ashok Kumar Gupta — Audit Officer

3. Geeta Aggarwal — Audit Officer

4. Ram Pat Singh Verma — Audit Officer

5. Nirmal Bansal — Audit Officer

The DPC in their meeting held on 14-1-2013 after considering the Annual ConfidentialReports/Annual rerformance Appraisal Reports and other relevant records recommended the names ofthe above officers, except at Sl. No. 1, i.e. Sh. Rishi Ram Gupta, for promotion as Senior Audit Officer on

[ 14 (N) ]

regular basis in Pay Band 3 : Rs. 15600-39100 with Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- from the date of taking overof the charge of the post of Senior Audit Officer.

There is no RDA/Police Case pending against any of the above officers, except at Sl. No. i.e.Sh. Rishl Ram. Gupta, against whom one Departmental Inquiry is pending and in his case “Sealed CoverProcedure” has been adopted.

The office of the Chief Auditor is still functioning as combined Audit Office for North, Southand East Delhi Municipal Corporations. Therefore, being the lead Corporation, the North Delh MunicipalCorporation through the Standing Committee of North Delhi Municipal Corporation is requested to approvethe proposal regarding promotion the following Audit Officers as Senior Audit Officer in Pay Band 3 :Rs. 15600-39100 with Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- from the date of taking over of the charge of the post ofSenior Audit Officer.

S/Sh./Smt.

1. Ashok Kumar Gupta

2. Geeta Aggarwal

3. Ram Pat Singh Verma

4. Nirmal Bansal

This may be treated as an Item of Urgent Business.

Resolution No. 272 Resolved that as recommended by the Standing Committee vide its ResolutionNo. 222 dated 30-1-2013, the proposal of the MCA as contained in his letterNo. MCA/Admn./PCA/3-32/Vol.-II/811 dated 15-1-2013 regarding promotion ofAudit Officers as Senior Audit Officers in the Pay Band 3 : 15600-39100 with GradePay Rs. 5,400/- from the date of taking over the charge of the post of Senior AuditOfficer, as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be approved.

The motion was carried.

Item No. 51 :— Condemnation and auction of Municipal Vehicles and unserviceable partsof Rohini Zone Auto Workshop under North Delhi MunicipalCorporation.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/DEMS/NDMC/996/C&C dated 14-6-2013.

The repair and maintence of the vehicles of Rohini Zone Auto Workshop and otherdepartments are being undertaken at Auto Workshop, Rohini Zone. These vehicle becomes unserviceableand beyond economical repair after completion of certain mileage or running for a definite period.Similarly, at the time of repair, old parts, which require replacement are inspected by the mechanic/Formanand when they are satisfied that the same require replacement, the new parts are issued against indentfrom the store after depositing the old condemned parts with the store.

[ 15 (N) ]

The following vehicles are lying off road and are beyond economical repair and the old sparepart also requires condemnation and auction :—

S. No. Description Nos.

1. Tata tipper 04 Nos.

2. Leyland Tipper 11 Nos.

3. Leyland Suction M/c 03 Nos.

4. Shaktiman Tipper 01 No.

5. J.C.B. Loader & Excavator 06 Nos.

6. Eicher Canter 01 No.

7. Unserviceable parts 01 Lot

The Corporation vide Resolution No. 404/Corpn. dated 9-10-2000 has approved thefollowing Board for condemnation and auction of the Municipal vehicles and used spare parts annexed asAnnexure ‘A’ :—

1. Director/Chief Engg. : Chairman

2. Deputy Commissioner of the Zone : Member

3. Joint Director/SE (Auto) concerned : Member

4. Executive Engineer (Auto) : Member

5. Asstt. Chief Accountant of the Zone : Member

6. A.E. (Auto)/F.M. (Auto)/AFM (Auto) of the Zone : Member & Convener

The Board assembled on 27-2-2013 at Auto Workshop, Rohini Zone, and inspected thevehicles, equipments & old unserviceable parts. The vehicles/equipments have outlived its useful life & oldunserviceable spare parts cannot be repaired/use again. The member of the Board is of the opinion thatthese vehicles/equipments are not economical and hence recommended for condemnation. The reserveprice has been fixed by the Board considering the physical condition of the vehicle/equipment andprevailing market value of the same. Annexed as Annexure ‘B’.

The material will be auctioned as per terms and conditions as per Annexure ‘C’.

Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.

The matter may be placed before the Corporation through Standing Committee for approval ofthe recommendation of the Condemnation Board to declare these J.C.Bs. and Jetting machine and tippertrucks etc. and spare parts condemned and to accept the reserve price fixed for each vehicle and spareparts. The auction Board may be authorized to accept the highest bid at the spot, if it is more than thereserve price, get the full amount deposited and allow the highest bidder to remove the auctioned articlesas per terms and conditions for the auction.

[ 16 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘A’

Copy of Resolution No. 404 of the Ordinary October (2000) Meeting of the Corporationheld on 9-10-2000.

Item No. 10 :— Approval of Condemnation and Auction Board.

(i) Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/CSE/480/C&C dated 28-7-2000.

The C.S.E. Department has different Auto Workshops for repair and maintenance ofMunicipal vehicles. These vehicles become unserviceable or go beyond economic repairs after completinga certain mileage of running for a definite period. More than 400 vehicles are lying off road and needcondemnation.

An Auction Board authorising the Chairman to accept the highest bid if the price received ismore than the reserve price has already been approved by the Standing Committee vide its Decision No.2770/Stg. dated 9-11-1994 and the same is as under :—

1. Superintending Engineer (Auto) : Chairman2. D.F.A. (W)—Representative : Member3. Internal Audit Officer—Representative : Member4. ADC/AC of the Zone : Member5. E.E. (CSE) of the Zone : Member6. E.E. (Auto) : Member7. A.E. (Auto) : MemberAt present different workshops are proposing different Condemnation and Auction Boards at

their own level to fix the reserve price of the vehicle and used spare parts.In view of the upgradation of the post of ADC/ZAC in Zones to the post of Dy. Commis-

sioner, it has become necessary to have the suggestion of the Deputy Commissioner concerned and henceit has been felt that a single rule for all the Zonal Workshops for the disposal of condemned vehicles maybe adopted and therefore, it is observed that it is essential to have a single rule for all the ZonalWorkshops. As such to streamline the procedure to Condemnation and Auction of the Municipal vehiclesand used spare parts, the following Board is hereby proposed :—

1. Director (CSE)-I to II (Respective Zone) : Chairman2. Deputy Commissioner of the Zone : Member3. Joint Director/SE (Auto) concerned : Member4. Executive Engineer (Auto) concerned : Member5. Asstt. Chief Accountant of the Zone : Member6. A.E. (Auto)/F.M. (Auto)/AFM (Auto) of the Zone : ConvenerThe abovesaid proposed Board shall fix the reserve price of the vehicles and spare parts and

accordingly the same shall be auctioned as per procedure authorising the Chairman to accept the highestbid if the price received is more than the reserved price.

The finance has concurred.The case may be placed before the Standing Committee to approve the Condemnation and

Auction Board as proposed above.(ii) Resolution No. 224 of the Standing Committee dated 6-9-2000.Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the proposal of the Commissioner as

contained in his letter No. F. 33/CSE/480/C&C dated 28-7-2000 regarding approval of Condemnation andAuction Board, be approved.

[ 26 (N) ]

ANNEXURE ‘C’

TERMS & CONDITIONS FOR THE AUCTION

1. Auction bid will be strictly on terms on as “As is where is basis”.

2. Intending bidder shall deposit earnest money of Rs. 10,000/- in cash or Bank Draft withthe Cashier. Failing which no one shall be permitted to participate in the bid. The earnestmoney will be returned subject to Condition No. 5.

3. Materials will be auctioned in lots on the spot. The full amount of the lot will be depositedat the fall of hammer with the Cashier immediately, so that auction for other lot could bestarted.

4. The highest bid is subjected to the acceptance by the Auction Board/Chairman on thespot.

5. If the highest bidder fails to deposit 100% of the bid at the fall of the hammer. His earnestmoney will be forfeited and bid of the second highest may not be accepted by theChairman of the Auction Board.

6. The highest bidder shall remove the condemned materials at his own cost within 4 daysafter acceptance from the premises, otherwise demurrage charges @ 1% of the highestbid per day of delay will be levied up to the maximum of 10% of the cost.

7. Auction Board reserve the right to reject the bids without assigning any reason.

8. Parties should arrange to take delivery of the auctioned material within the stipulatedperiod after accepting the bid by the competent authority.

9. The successful bidder must produce cash receipt (G-8) and acceptance letter issued byEE(Auto) before taking delivery. In the event of loss of cash receipt. M.C.D. will not beresponsible for delivery.

10. In case of any dispute arising during the conduct of auction, the decision of the Chairmanwill be binding on the parties.

(ii) Resolution No. 464 of the Standing Committee dated 3-9-2008.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the proposal of the Commissioner asin his letter No. F. 33/DEMS/1076/C&C dated 5-8-2008, be approved.

Resolution No. 436 Resolved that it be recommended by the Standing Committee vide itsResolution No. 464 dated 3-9-2008, the proposal of the Commissioner as contained inhis letter No. F. 33/DEMS/1076/C&C dated 5-8-2008, be approved.

PART ‘B’

Item No. 94 :— Promotion of Asstt. Audit Officers in the Pay Band 2 : Rs. 9300-34800 withGrade Pay Rs. 4,800/- to the post of Audit Officer in the Pay Band 2 : Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- on regular basis.

MCA’s letter No. MCA/Admn./PCA/3-162/2071 dated 21-6-2013.

There are total 33 sanctioned posts in the cadre of Audit Officer/Sr. Audit Officer andDy. Chief Auditor. As per Rule 254 of GFR, vacancies in higher post can be utilized to make appointmentin the lower cadre. Against these 33 posts 30 posts are filled up, thereby leaving 3 vacancies available forpromotion to the post of Audit Officer on regular basis. Apart from this, one Audit Officer is going to retireon 31-7-2013. Therefore, this one post is also available for promotion.

As per Recruitment Rules, six years regular service is required as Asstt. Audit Officer forpromotion as Audit Officer. Against 4 vacancies, following 6 officers who have rendered minimumqualifying service of 6 years in the cadre of Asstt. Audit Officer came under consideration zone :—

S. No. Name S/Sh.

1. Parmod Kumar Jain

2. Hamant Kumar Sharma

3. Navin Kumar Bhateja

4. Ganesh Prasad

5. Shashi Bhushan Singh

6. Raj Kumar Sahani

As per roaster one post is reserved for ST Candidate which can not be filled up by he GeneralCandidate. Since no ST Candidate is available in the cadre, this post will remain unfilled as per Rules. Theother eligible incumbent Sh. P.K. Jain at Sl. No. 1 in the zone of consideration is presently undergoing twojudicial proceedings against him. Therefore, in his case sealed cover procedure has been followed as perRules.

The DPC in their meeting held on 18-6-2013 after considering Annual Performance AppraisalReports and other relevant record of the officers in the consideration zone recommended the names of thefollowing two officers for promotion as Audit Officer on regular basis :—

S. No. Name S/Sh.

1. Hamant Kumar Sharma

2. Navin Kumar Bhateja

There is no RDA/Vigilance Case pending against the above officers and they are not undercurrency of punishment.

The office of the Chief Auditor is still functioning as combined Audit Office for North, Southand East Delhi Municipal Corporations. Therefore, being the lead Corporation, the Standing Committee ofNorth Delhi Municipal Corporation is requested to approve the promotion of above two Asstt. AuditOfficers as Audit Officer in PB 2 : Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- on regular basis.

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ENGINEERING DEPARMENT

No………………………… Dated………… From The Commissioner {North} North Delhi Municipal Corporation 4th floor, Civic Center, Delhi. To, The Municipal Secretary {North} North Delhi Municipal Corporation 4th floor, Civic Center, Delhi. Subject:- Development works in approved colony (1) Imp. Dev. Of lane by pdg. RCC Box Drain from 5 to 29 D in Kamla Nagar inC-69/CLZ (2) Imp./dev. Of lane by pdg. RMC from 5 to 29 D in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ. A clubbed estimates amounting to Rs.1428700+2455100=38,83,800/- were

prepared and administrative approval & expenditure sanction of the same were

accorded by the competent authority.

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs.1428700+2455100=38,83,800/-

has been got technically sanctioned from the competent authority and a draft NIT was

also got approved for percentage rate from the competent authority. Tender amounting

to Rs.24,82,440/- were called vide NIT No. EE-M-III/CLZ/TC/2011-12/38/33 dated

31.01.12 due on 21.02.2012. Downloading of tender documents & opening of tenders

was on line & the same were opened on 21.02.2012.

Three tenders were sold and received. The quoted rates of the contractor were as

per the comparative statement given below:-

S.No. Name of Contractor Rate Remarks

1. M/s Garg Const. Co. @30.01%Above G.8. No.011451Dt. 21.02.12

2. M/s Gupta Engg. Co. @45.45%Above

3. M/s Deepak Traders @70.00%Above

The justification of rate has been worked out @45.57%Above, against offer of the

lowest contractor M/s Garg Const. Co. @30.01%Above, which are well within the

justified rates. The work is covered under scope of sanctioned scheme. The validity of

rates holds good upto 31.05.13. Budget provision exists under Head o f A/c XL-VIII-Z-

A.

The finance has seen & concurred the proposal.

M/s Garg Const. Co. class IIIrd in MCD and is eligible to tender amount. His

financial as well as technical performance is satisfactory. He is not blacklisted/ debarred

at the time of purchase of tender.

The expenditure will be charged under the Head of A/c XL-VIII-ZA. The time

of completion of this work is Six months reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work

order. Rates are valid upto 31.05.2013.

The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of Rate &

agency in favor of M/s Garg Const. Co. at their quoted rate @ Rs.30.01% above against

the justification of @Rs.45.57%above at a contractual cost of Rs.32,27,417/- and

authorize the Commissioner to enter into contract as required U/S 202-C of DMC Act

amended till date.

Addl. Commissioner {Engg.}North For Commissioner

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

No :- Date :-

From

The Commissioner North Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, Delhi To The Secretary

North Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, Delhi

Name of Work :- Imp. Dev. of strenthing of road from Kunji Lal Halwai to Indira Market, H.No. 3450, H.No. 4097 & H.No. 3519 to H.No. 3342 Aryapura by pdg Mastic in Malka Ganj Ward-9/CLZ

These are the main link roads connecting Aryapura from Roshanara Road in Malka Ganj Ward C-9/CLZ. During the inspection of the area along with Hon’ble M.P. Sh. Jai Prakash Aggarwal, area MLA and MCD officials. During the inspection it was decided to improve the riding quality of roads by providing 25mm thick mastic asphalt after correcting the surface. The area MLA have given budget out of his constituency funds of AC-3 under Head of A/c XL-VIII-S.

Accordingly, an estimate amounting to Rs. 43,21,200/- has been have been prepared to cover the cost of the above said work under head of account XL-VIII-S. Administrative approval and expenditure sanction to this estimate was accorded by Wards Committee, Civil Line Zone vide resolution No. 17/15 dated 20.12.2012.

Tenders for the above said work amounting to Rs. 39,38,871/- were invited through E-tendering system vide NIT No. EE(M-II)/CLZ/TC/2012-13/36, item No. 1 dated 28.01.13, vide tender No. 182126 after giving wide publicity in the following news papers :-

SI No. Name of Newspapers Language Date

1. The Hindu Urdu 28.01.13

2. Dainik Jagran Hindi 28.01.13

3. Punjab Kesri Hindi 28.01.13

4. Roznama Rashtriya Sahara English 28.01.13

In response, three tenders were received / downloaded from the Comparative statement of the same is as under:-

S.N Name of agency Quoted Rate Remarks

1. M/s Balaji & Associates @ 12.80% below G8 No. 061320 dt 20.02.13

2. M/s Maman Chand Bansal

@ 12.50% above

3. M/s Ashok Kumar Gupta @6.90 %below

The justification of rates have been checked by the department comes to @ 20.00% above. The rates quoted by the lowest tenderer M/s Balaji & Associates@ 12.80%below are abnormally below when compared with the justification. Due to ALR case to ensure quality, the instructions followed as per circular issued in this regard.


M/s Balaji & Associates is a registered contractor in Class III with MCD and is eligible to tender for this work. His financial as well as technical capability is satisfactory. The firm is neither debarred nor blacklisted at the time of tendering.

The total cost of this work comes to Rs. 33,11,000/-(Rest.) due to UD Amt.) chargeable to Head of A/c XL-VIII-S. The time of completion of this work is five months and the rates are valid upto 14.07.13.

Being ABNORMALLY LOW RATE CASE 100% Test Check by AE and 50% Test Check by EE-concerned is required.

The case is to be placed before the standing committee for approval of rates and agency in favour of M/s Balaji & Associates @ 12.80%below against justification 20.00%above with a contractual amount of Rs. 33,11,000/-(Rest. Due to UD Amt.) under the head of account XL-VIII-S, and to authorized the Commissioner/NDMC to enter into agreement with lowest tenderer as per conditions of NIT.

Addl. Commissioner(Engg.)/NDMC For Commissioner/NDMC

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT)

No. ____________ Dated_____ From: The Commissioner North Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre Delhi To: The Municipal Secretary, North Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre Delhi Name of Work: ‐ Imp. Dev. of drainage system of 30' ROW Roads in Avtar Enclave & A‐5B SFS

Flats, Shanti Kunj, Paschim Vihar in Rohini Zone.

Administrative Approval to the estimate has been accorded by Hon’ble L.G. vide his

orders dated 19.01.13 which has been communicated by Dy. Secretary (MB) dated 28.01.13 for

Rs.2,01,79,650/‐ under Head of A/C: L.A. Road.

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 1,96,16,432/‐ was prepared based on

DSR 2012 and approved rates of MCD and got technically sanctioned from the Competent

Authority. Expenditure sanction for an amount of Rs. 2,01,79,650/‐. In anticipation of the

sanction by Corporation has been accorded by Hon’ble Mayor. A draft NIT amounting to

Rs.2,07,78,091/‐ was prepared got approved form the Competent Authority.

Tenders were called on percentage rates basis vide NIT No. 03/EE(MRZ)‐I/13‐14 Item

No. 01 dated 26.04.13 and due for opening on 20.05.13 after circulating the copies of NIT in

various offices and through e‐tendering. Press publicity in the following newspapers: ‐

Sr. No. Name of News Papers Language Published on

1. The Time of India English 02.05.13

2. Punjab Kesari Hindi 02.05.13

3. Dainik Bhasker Hindi 02.05.13

4. Roznama Rashtriya Sahara Urdu 02.05.13

Seven tenders were sold and out of which four tenders were received. The rates offered

by the tenderers are as under:

S. No.

Name of tenderer Rates Received

Remarks

1. M/s. Satya Construction

@ 31.23% below

Earnest money of Rs.4,32,000/‐ Deposited vide G‐ 8 No. 062090 Dt. 21.05.13

2. M/s. Naresh Kumar Aggarwal

@ 9.18% below

Earnest money deposited through DD/ pay order and refunded.

3. M/s. S.K. & Co. @ 7.28% below


4. M/s. Roopam Construction Co.

@ 11.6% below


Justification of rats has been worked out by the Department, which comes to @ 11.40%

above.

The lowest tenderer M/s. Satya Construction has quoted the rates @ 31.23% below. The

quoted rats of the lowest tenderer M/s. Satya Constructions @ 31.23% below were considered

reasonable & well within the justification of rates. Hence, recommended for acceptance.

M/s. Satya Constructions is a registered contractor under Class‐III/ M.C.D. and is eligible

to tender for this work. The firm is not black listed/debarred as on date. The contractual amount

of the work comes to Rs. 1,42,90,159/‐. The time of completion of the work is 12 months to be

reckoned from the 10th day after issue of the work order. The validity of rates is available upto

19.12.13. The expenditure is proposed to be charged under Head of account: L.A. Road under

the current financial year.


Being ALR case the condition of 100% test check by AE & 50% test check by EE shall be adhered to.

The case may be placed before the Standing Committee under section 202 (C) DMC Act

amended till date of approval of rates and agency in favour of M/s. Satya Constn. for the above

cited work under Head of Account: L.A. Road at his quoted rates @ 31.23% below against JOR @

11.40% above with a contractual amount of Rs.1,42,90,159/‐ and to authorize the Commissioner

to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer as required under DMC Act (Amended to

date).

ADDL. COMMISSIONER (ENGG.)/N.D.M.C. FOR COMMISSIONER


OFFICE OF THE EX. ENGINEER (M‐RZ)‐I

KESHAV PURAM DELHI‐110035

No. EE (M‐RZ)‐I/13‐14/ _____ Dated ______

Subject: Imp. Dev. of drainage system of 30' ROW Roads in Avtar Enclave

& A‐5B SFS Flats, Shanti Kunj, Paschim Vihar in Rohini Zone.

Please fine enclosed herewith six copies of the preamble for the

above noted work to be placed before the Standing Committee.

Encl: As above

Ex. Engineer (MRZ)‐I

A.O. (C&C)/ NDMC

Civic Centre, New Delhi


Minutes of the meeting of the Standing Committee (North Delhi) held on Wednesday, the 3rd July, 2013 at 2.00 P.M. at Satya Narayan Bansal Sabhagaar, 2nd Floor, A-Wing,Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre, New Delhi.

PRESENT

1. Shri Ram Kishan Singhal Chairman

2. Shri Mohan Prasad Bhardwaj Dy. Chairman

3. Ms. Kesh Rani

4. Shri Mukesh Goyal

5. Shri Devender Solanki

6. Shri Prithvi Singh Rathore

7. Shri Mahender Nagpal

8. Ms. Renu Gupta

9. Shri Virender Babbar

10. Shri Yogender Chandolia

11. Shri Bharat Bhushan Madan

Shri P.K. Gupta, Commissioner and Shri Jagdeep Chiller, Municipal Secretary.

vYidkfyd iz'u%

¼1½ fo|ky;ksa ls lEcfU/kr A

cSBd ds izkjEHk esa Jh eqds'k xks;y] usrk foi{k us Lo;a }kjk

yxk;s x;s fo|ky;ksa ls lEcf/kr vYidkfyd iz'u ij ppkZ vkjEHk djrs

gq, dgk fd ;g vk'oklu fn;k x;k Fkk fd Ldwyksa esa NqfV~V;ksa ls igys

fo|ky;ksa esaa oDlZ foHkkx ls lEcfU/kr lHkh dk;Z iwjs dj fy, tk,axsa ,oa

MsLdksa dh vkiwfrZ dj nh tk,xh ysfdu ,d tqykbZ ls Ldwy [kqy pqds gSa

vkSj NqfV~V;ksa ls igys Ldwyksa esa tks MSLd igqapus Fks oks vHkh rd ugha igq¡ps

gSA eaxksy iqjh fo|ky; esa nq"deZ dh ?kVuk ?kfVr gksus ds ckn fo|ky;ksa

dh pkjnhokjh dks Å¡pk djus rFkk daVhys rkj yxkus ds fy, dgk x;k

Fkk A mUgksaus tkuuk pkgk fd fdrus Ldwyksa dh pkjnhokfj;ksa dks Å¡pk

dj fn;k x;k gS rFkk fdruh pkjnhokfj;ksa ij daVhys rkj yxk fn;k x;s

gS vkSj fdu&fdu fo|ky;ksa esa MSLd Hksts tk pqds gSa A vkxs cksyrs gq,

mUgksaus dgk fd cPpksa dks vPNh lqfo/kk;sa nsus dh ckr rks dh tkrh gSa

ysfdu mUgsa lqfo/kk;sa miyC/k ugha djk;h tkrhA mUgksaus tkudkjh pkgh

fd ?kVuk ?kVus ds ckn fdrus fo|ky;ksa es lh-lh-Vh-oh- dSejs yxk;s x;s

gSaA mUgksaus ;g Hkh dgk fd VSaMj izfdz;k esa lkyksa yxk fn;s tkrs gSa vkSj

VS.Mj gksus ds ckn muds le; ij odZ&vkMjZ ugha fd;s tkrs gSa A mUgksaus

VSaMj izfdz;k dks yEcs le; rd pyrs jgus ij jks"k O;Dr fd;k A bl

fo"k; ij mUgksaus vk;qDr ds mRrj dh ekax Hkh dh A

&2&

v/;{k ds vkns'k ij funs”kd ¼f”k{kk½ us lfefr dks voxr djk;k

fd 5000 MSLdksa dh Lohd`fr nh tk pqdh gS vkSj ;s MsLd ujsyk] jksfg.kh]

lnj igkM+xat ,oa flVh tksu esa fHktok fn;s x;s gSaA dqy 584 Hkou gSa

ftuesa 565 Ldwy py jgsa gSa A dkaVsnkj rkj yxkus gsrq ek¡x fHktok nh xbZ

gSA dqy 26000 MsLd vkus gSa ftuesa ls 11000 MsLd izkIr gks pqds gSa A

Ldwyksa dhs MSLdksa ls lEcfU/kr fjiksVZ lfefr dh vkxkeh cSBd esa izLrqr

dj nh tk;sxhA

bl ij Jh xks;y us dgk fd nq"deZ dh ?kVuk Qjojh ekg esa

?kfVr gqbZ Fkh ysfdu vHkh rd fo|ky;ksa esa daVhys rkj yxkus rFkk

pkjnhokjh dks Åapk djus ds dk;Z dks iwjk ugha fd;k x;k gS A ,slk yxrk

gS fd iz'kklu cPpksa dh lqj{kk ds fy, xEHkhj ugha gS A

bl ij izeq[k vfHk;Urk us crk;k fd f'k{kk foHkkx ls vkbZ ekax dk

,sLVhesV cuk dj VSaMj dkWy dj fy;s x;s gSA fo|ky;ksa esaa daVhys rkj

yxkus rFkk pkjnhokjh dks Åapk djus ds dk;Z ds Hkh VSaMj dkWy dj fy;s

x;s gaSA

v/;{k us bl fo"k; ij foLr`r fjiksVZ vkxkeh cSBd esa izLrqr djus

rFkk MsLd&forj.k dh iwjh fjiksVZ usrk lnu ,oa usrk foi{k dks dy rd

miyC/k djkus dk vkns'k fn;k A

Jh i`Foh flag jkBkSj us dgk fd fuxe ds lHkh N% tksuksa esa MsLd

iagqpus pkfg, Fks ysfdu vHkh nks tksuksa dks MsLd dh lIykbZ ugha dh xbZ

gS A

Jh eqds�k xks;y }kjk MsLd lIykbZ dh vfUre frfFk dh tkudkjh

ekaxus ij vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼f'k{kk½ us lfefr dks voxr djk;k fd MsLd

lIykbZ dk odZ&vkMZj Qjojh dk gS vkSj 30 ebZ rd lIykbZ gks tkuh

pkfg, Fkh A lIykbZ ds fy, ,d ekg dh ,DlVSa'ku nh xbZ Fkh A le;

ij lIykbZ uk nsus ij mu ij fu;e ,oa 'krksZ ds vuqlkj isusYVh Hkh yxkbZ

tk;sxh ftls isesUV ls dkV fy;k tk,xk A mUgksaus tqykbZ ekg ds vUr

rd MsLdks dh iwjh lIykbZ gks tkus dk vk'oklu fn;k A

rRi'pkr~ MkW0 egsUnz ukxiky] usrk lnu us fuxe dh [kkyh

iM+h lEifRr;ksa dk ekeyk mBkrs gq, dgk fd fnYyh ds vUnj txg de

gSA dbZ Ldwy Hkou [kkyh iM+s gSa ftudk mi;ksx ogk¡ ij fte] fMlisaljh

vkfn cukdj fd;k tk ldrk gSA dbZ fo|ky; izkbZe yksds”ku ij gSa

ftuesa cPpksa dh la[;k igys ls de gks x;h gSA tks Hkou [krjukd gSa ;k

ftu ij dksVZ dsl gSa bl ckjs esa mUgksaus lh-,y-vks- ls mudh jk; tkuus

dk lq>ko fn;k A

&3&

v/;{k us cUn iM+s fo|ky;ksa dh tkudkjh miyC/k djkus dk vkns'k

nsrs gq, dgk fd fdrus Ldwy ,sls gSa tks cUn gSa t¡gk ,d Hkh cPpk ugha

i<+rkA mUgksaus ;g Hkh crk;k fd deZiqjk esa 6 lky ls ,d Ldwy fcfYMax

cUn iM+h gS tgka ij 4 pkSdhnkj fu;qDr gSa A

Jh eqds�k xks;y us dgk fd U;k;ky; ds funsZ'k gaS fd f'k{kk ls

lEcfU/kr Hkouksa dk mi;ksx vU; dk;ksZ ds fy, ugha fd;k tk ldrk

ysfdu ,slh txgks dk mi;ksx ykbZczsjh]oksds”kuy Vªsfuax] cPpksa ds fy,

baMksj xsEl] fp=dyk izfr;ksfxrk vkfn ds fy, rks fd;k tk ldrk gSA

Jh Hkkjr Hkw’k.k enku us vkifRr O;Dr djrs gq, dgk fd okMZ

ua0 99 eksrh uxj es fuxe dk ,d Ldwy gS ftlesa nf{k.kh fnYyh ds ty

cksMZ dk LVkWQ cSBk gqvk gSA mUgksaus bldh tkap djokus dk vkxzg fd;k

A

i`Foh flag jkBkSj us dgk fd Tokykiqjh fLFkr fo|ky; dk

vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk fujh{k.k fd;k x;k vkSj ik;k x;k fd ;g Ldwy ,e-lh-

Mh- dh lwph esa gh ugha gS tc fd ;g fuxe dk fo|ky; gS vkSj blesa

60&70 v/;kid Hkh dk;Zjr gSa ysfdu fuxe ds ikl bl fo|ky; dk

dksbZ fjdkMZ gh miyC/k ugha gSA

v/;{k ds vkns'k ij vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼vfHk0½ us crk;k fd fuxe

fo|ky;ksa ds vfrfjDr ,slh cgqr lh lEifRr;ka gS ftudh vkbZ0 ih0

jftLVj esa izfof’V ugha gS A ,slh Hkh lEHkkouk gks ldrh gS fd fcfYMax

fdlh vkSj dh gks vkSj fo|ky; fuxe dk py jgk gks A mUgksaus dgk fd

vkbZ0 ih0 jftLVjksa dks dEI;wVjhd`r fd;k tk jgk gSA dEI;wVjhd`r djus

ds i'pkr~ bldh lwph lHkh foHkkxk/;{kksa dks miyC/k djok nh tk,xh

ftlls os lEifRr;ksa dh tkap dj ldsxsa A mUgksaus tqykbZ ds vUr rd

vkbZ0 ih0 jftLVjksa dks dEI;wVjhd`r gksus dh vk'kk trkbZ A

vYidkfyd iz'u%

¼2½ fcfYMax IYkku ls lEcfU/kr A

MkW0egsUnz ukxiky us lqJh js.kq xqIrk }kjk yxk;s x;s fcfYMax

IYkku ls lEcfU/kr vYidkfyd iz'u ij ppkZ vkjEHk djrs gq, tkuuk

pkgk fd vkWuykbZu flLVe “kq: gks tkus ds ckotwn Hkh QkeZ& ch ds

ekeys esa nsj D;ksa yxrh gS A ;fn bls gVk;k tk ldrk gS rks bls gVk

fn;k tkuk pkfg,A mUgksaus ;g Hkh tkuuk pkgk fd dEiyh'ku lfVZfQdsV

fdrus le; esa feyrk gSA mUgksaus ;g Hkh dgk fd vkt 90 izfr”kr yksxksa

ds ikl dEiyh'ku lfVZfQdsV ugha gS A bl fo"k; ij mUgksaus vk;qDr ds

mRrj dh ekax dh A

&4&

v/;{k ds vkns'k ij lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh us crk;k fd QkeZ ^ch*

Hkkjr ljdkj ds funsZ'kkuqlkj tkjh gqvk gS tksfd IyhUFk ysoy ij fn;k

tkrk gSA QkeZ ch dh le;&lhek 30 fnu gS A dEiyh'ku lfVZfQdsV 30

fnu ds vUnj Lohd`r gksuk pkfg;s ;k fujLr gksuk pkfg;sA mUgksaus dgk

vukWFkjkbTM jsxqyjkbZts'ku Ldhe fudkyh xbZ gS ftlls dEiyh'ku

lfVZfQdsV feyus esa vklkuh gksxh A

Jh eqds�k xks;y us tkuuk pkgk lsYQ ,slsLlesUV Ldhe ds

vUrxZr ;fn O;fDr isusYVh vkfn ns nsrk gS rks D;k mls dEiyh'ku

lfVZfQdsV fey tk,xk A

lqJh js.kq xqIrk us vius vYidkfyd iz”u ds miyC/k djk;s x;s

mRrj ij vlUrks’k O;Dr djrs gq, dgk fd mRrj nsrs le; mlds lkFk

vU; fooj.k Hkh miyC/k djk;s tkus pkfg, A mUgksaus vkxs dgk fd

vYidkfyd iz”u esa tks vk; fn[kkbZ xbZ gS og uD'kksa ls izkIr vk; gS

ysfdu dEiyh'ku lfVZfQdsV uk nsus ls dksbZ vk; izkIr ugha gqbZ gS A

vukf/kd`r fuekZ.k esa dEikmUMscy fyfeV esa dk;ksZ ls tks vk; gksrh gS og

yxHkx 100 djksM+ fn[kkbZ xbZ gS ysfdu ;g vk; nksxquh gks ldrh Fkh A

bl gkfu ds fy, dkSu ftEesnkj gS A

lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh us crk;k fd dEiyh'ku lfVZfQdsV rks ysuk

t:jh gS ysfdu pkftZt T;knk gksus ds dkj.k o vU; dkj.kksa ls yksx ysrs

ugha gSA LVkQ Hkh v:fp fn[kkrk gS D;ksafd yksx dEiyh'ku lfVZfQdsV

ysus ds ckn lEifRr;ksa esa Qsjcny dj ysrs gS vkSj nkf;Ro mu ij vkrk

gS A

Jh i`Foh flag jkBkSj us dgk fd Mh-Mh-,- ls gLrkarj.k gksus okyh

dkyksfu;ksa esa fuxe Lo;a uD'ks ikl djds djksM+ks :i;s dh vk; vftZr

dj ldrk gS A

Jh eqds'k xks;y us dgk fd vukf/kd`r fuekZ.k dks fu;fer djus

ds fy, ;kstuk ykbZ tkrh gS rks ;fn dksbZ O;fDr viuh lEifRr esa

ekewyh Qsjcny djrk gS rks bls utjvankt dj ml O;fDr dks Hkh jkgr

iznku dh tkuh pkfg,A 135 Lds;j QqV dqy ,Q-,-vkj- crk;s tkus ij

Jh xks;y us tkuuk pkgk fd ;g fdrus ehVj ds IykV ij gS A

bl ij lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh us Li’V fd;k fd iwjs Hkou ij 135

Lds;j QqV ;k 13-5 ehVj dh dqy ,Q-,-vkj- dh vuqefr gS A

&5&

v/;{k }kjk dEiyh'ku pkftZt dh tkudkjh ekaxus ij lEcfU/kr

vf/kdkjh us crk;k fd ;g Qhl 1@&:0 izfr oxZ QqV gS A

Jh eqds'k xks;y us lq>ko fn;k fd Hkou esa dqN vkSj vf/kd ,Q-

,-vkj-dh vuqefr nsdj fuxe jktLo esa o`f) dh tk ldrh gS A

Jh Ekksgu Hkkj}kt us dgk fd ?kks?kk Mk;jh esa rst vka/kh ds dkj.k

rhu “kSMksa dh Nr mM+ xbZ gS ftlls 10&12 cPpksa dks pksV yxh gSA

mUgksaaus 'kSMks dh 'kh?kz ejEer djkus dk vkxzg fd;k A mUgksausa ;g Hkh dgk

fd ukys dh nksuksa rjQ 4 QqV Åaph nhokj cuk;h tk;s rkfd mlesa i”kq

vkfn ds fxjus dh ?kVuk uk gks A lkFk gh mUgksaus ukys dks yS.Vj ls <ds

tkus dk vuqjks/k Hkh fd;k A

bl lEcU/k esa izeq[k vfHk;Urk us tkudkjh nh fd Vks&oky ds fy,

34 yk[k :0 dk ,sLVhesV cuk;k fn;k x;k gSA

MkW0 egsUnz ukxiky us dgk fd xka/kh eSnku rFkk ijsM xzkmaM

fLFkr ikfdZax ij fu/kkZfjr 'kqYd ls vf/kd jkf'k dh olwyh dh tkrh gS A

mUgkasus nks ikfdZax LFkyksa ds mn~?kkVu ds ckjs esa Hkh tkudkjh pkgh A

Jh eqds�k xks;y us Hkh dgk fd ikfdZax okys 10 :Ik;s dh ijph

dkVrs gSa ysfdu 30 :0 olwyrs gSA mUgksaus lq>ko fn;k fd ikfdZax ds

ckgj cksMZ ij f'kdk;r ds fy, Qksu ua0 ,oa fu/kkZfjr Qhl n'kkZ;h tkuh

pkfg, A

v/;{k us dgk fd fMykbZV flusek ds lkFk okyh ikfdZax dk nkSjk

fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj ik;k x;k Fkk fd ogka LdwVj ikfdZax dh jlhn gh ugha

nh tk jgh Fkh A blds vfrfjDr ogka i;kZIr izdk”k O;oLFkk Hkh ugha Fkh A

mUgksaus bl ckjs esa dh xbZ dkjZokbZ ds ckjs esa tkuuk pkgk A

v/;{k ds vkns'k ij vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼vfHk0½ us lfefr dks voxr djk;k fd vko';d funsZ'k tkjh dj fn;s x;s gSa rFkk lnj igkM+xat ,oa djksy ckx tksu esa ikfdZax okyksa dks uksfVl Hkh fn;s x;s gSa A bl lanHkZ esa Nkikekj Vhe Hkh Hksth xbZ Fkh ysfdu Vhe }kjk vf/kd jkf'k olwyus dk ekeyk ugha ik;k x;k A

deyk uxj ikfdZax ds ckjs esa mUgksaus crk;k fd lEHkor% 15 tqykbZ rd bl ikfdZax dk Vªk;y vkjEHk gks tk;sxk rFkk ekMWy Vkmu okyh ikfdZax ds mn~?kkVu dh frfFk 1 vxLr j[kh xbZ gS A

v/;{k us tkuuk pkgk fd fuxe fo|ky;ksa ds ckgj fnYyh ljdkj

}kjk gksfMZxa yxk;s x;s gSa ;s fdldh vuqefr ls yxk;s x;s gSa A

&6&

Jh ;ksxsUnz pkUnksfy;k us v/;{k dk leFkZu djrs gq, dgk fd ;s

lHkh gksfMZax voS/k :i ls yxk;s x;s gSa rFkk lq>ko fn;k fd budks

isM&lkbZV ?kksf’kr fd;k tk, A

Jh Hkkjr Hkw’k.k enku us lhesUV ds vHkko esa fodkl dk;Z uk gksus

dk eqn~nk mBk;k A

vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼vfHk0½ us Li’V fd;k fd flesaV dk vkWMZj gks

pqdk gS rFkk psd Hkh ns fn;k x;k gS A mUgksaus vxys lIrkg rd lhesUV

lIykbZ dk vk”oklu fn;k A

Jh i`Foh flag jkBkSj us nf{k.kh fnYyh uxj fuxe dh Hkkafr ukWu

eSfVªd is&Ldsy okyksa dks Vªsfuax nsdj mudks fn;k tkus okyk Ldsy fn;s

tkus dk vkxzg fd;k A

vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼foRr½ us crk;k fd bl lEcU/k esa 'kh?kz gh ,d

ifji= tkjh fd;k tk jgk gS A mUgksusa ;g Hkh crk;k fd fuj{kj

deZpkfj;ksa ds fy, 2 ekg rd izfrfnu 2 ?kaVs dk izf'k{k.k j[kk x;k gS

rFkk ukWu eSfVªd@lk{kj ds fy, rhu lIrkg dh izkQs'kuy Vªsfuax j[kh xbZ

gS A bl dk;Z ds fy, ,sls fo|ky;ksa dks fpfUgr fd;k x;k gS ftuesa

nwljh ikyh ugha pyrh ftlls fuxe dks iSls dh cpr gksxh A ;g Vªsfuax

mRrjh fnYyh uxj fuxe ds v/;kidksa }kjk nh tk;xh vkSj blds fy,

ekuns; fn;k tk;sxk A ftu deZpkfj;ksa dks ;g ykHk feyuk gS mudh

tkudkjh foHkkxk/;{kksa ls yh tk jgh gS A

Jh i`Foh flag jkBkSj us esVªks osLV dh dk;Z&iz.kkyh ij iz'u fpUg

yxkrs gq, dgk fd bl dEiuh dk dk;Z lUrks’ktud ugh gS A mUgksaus bl

dEiuh ij isusYVh yxkus dk lq>ko fn;k A

Jh ;ksxsUnz pkUnksfy;k us 30 twu rd izkIr gksus okys gkml VSDl

,oa dUotZu pktZ dh tkudkjh ekaxrs gq, dgk fd fiNys o’kZ dh rqyuk esa

;g jkf'k de gS ;k vf/kd A

vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼jktLo½ us lfefr dks crk;k fd vc rd 150

djksM+ :0 dk jktLo izkIr gks pqdk gS tcfd fiNys o’kZ ;g 110 djksM+

:i;s Fkk A mUgksusa ;g jkf'k 180 djksM+ :0 rd iagqpus dk vuqeku

trk;k A

Jh eqds'k xks;y us dgk fd ;fn jktLo esa o`f) gqbZ gS rks

dj&nj esa o`f) dh xbZ gS tcfd Hkktik }kjk dksbZ dj uk c<+kus dh ckr

dh xbZ Fkh A

&7&

v/;{k us dgk fd dj esa o`f) ugha dh xbZ cfYd djnkrkvksa dh

la[;k esa o`f) gqbZ gS A

vfrfjDr vk;qDr ¼vfHk0½ us crk;k fd 31 ekpZ] 2013 rd 106 djksM+ :0 dUotZu pktZ dh izkfIr gqbZ gS tks fd fiNys o’kZ dh rqyuk esa vf/kd gS A mUgksaus 30 twu rd ds vkadM+s vkxkeh cSBd esa miyC/k djkus ds fy, dgk A

PART- A POSTPONED CASES

Item No. 20 Final Report of Third Municipal Valuation Committee. Consideration postponed. Item No. 41 Appointment of Independent Consultant [IC] to independently monitor the work

of the Public Private Partnership Project in Collection, Segregation, Transportation & Delivery of MSW in 6 MCD Zones i.e. Karol Bagh Zone, City Zone, Sadar Pahar Ganj Zone, West Zone , Central Zone & South Zone.

Reso.No. 155 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that as

recommended by DEMS Committee vide its its Resolution No. 3 dated 14.5.2013, the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letter No. F.33/DEMS/NDMC/432/C&C dated 14.1.2013, be approved.

NEW CASES

Item No.50 Promotion to the post of Senior Audit Officer in the Pay Band 3:Rs.15600-39100

with Grade Pay Rs. 5400/- on regular basis. Reso. No. 156 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that as proposed by

MCA in his letter No.MCA/Admn./PCA/3-32/Vol.II/2041 dated 11.6.2013, approval for promotion of Shri Rishi Ram Gupta, Sr.Audit Officer ( adhoc) in the Pay Band 3: Rs. 15600-39100 with Grade Pay Rs. 5400/- on regular basis with effect from 16.5.2012 i.e. the date from which his immediate junior Shri Manoj Kant Bhatnagar was promoted/regularized to that post, as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be accorded.

Item No.51 Condemnation and auction of Municipal Vehicles and unserviceable parts of

Rohini Zone Auto Workshop under North Delhi Municipal Corporation Reso. No. 157 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the proposal of

the Commissioner as contained in his letter No. F.33/DEMS/NDMC/996/C&C dated 14.6.2013, be approved.

PART-B

Item No.94 Promotion of Asstt. Audit Officers in the Pay Band 2: Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade

Pay . 4800/- to the post of Audit Officer in the Pay Band2: Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay Rs. 5400/- on regular basis.

Reso No 158 Resolved that as proposed by MCA in his letter No.MCA/Admn./PCA/

3-162/ 2071 dated 21.6.2013, approval for promotion of two Asstt. Audit Officers namely Shri Hamant Kumar Sharma and Shri Navin Kumar Bhateja in the Pay Band 2: Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Pay Rs. 4800/- to the post of Audit Officer in the Pay Band 2: Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay Rs. 5400/- on regular basis, as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be accorded.

-8-

PLACED ON TABLE

Item No.95 Development works in approved colony SH(1) Stg. of road by pdg. Bituminous mastic from Banglow Road to Aggarsen Chowk in Kamla Ngar in C-69/CLZ(2) Stg. of Road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Aggarsen Chowk to GT Road in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ (3) Stg. of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from D1 to Bhatia Chowk and D-30 to Mandelia Road in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ (4) Stg. of road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from 4A to 84A and 36A to 112A in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ (5) Stg. of Road by pdg. Bituminous Mastic from Mandelia Road to Kohlapur road and adjoining roads in F-Block in Kamla Nagar in C-60/CLZ.

Reso No. Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letter 159 No.F.33/Engg./NDMC/1082/C&C dated 1.7.2013, be approved.

Item No.96 Development works in approved colony (1) Imp. Dev. of land by pdg. RCC Box Drain from 5 to 29 D in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ (2) Imp../dev. of lane by pdg. RMC from 5 to 29D in Kamla Nagar in C-69/CLZ.


Item No.97 Imp. Dev. of strengthing of road from Kunji Lal Halwai to Indira Market H.No.3450 H.No.4097 & H.No.3519 to H.No.3342 Aryapura by pdg. Mastic in Malka Ganj Ward No.9/CLZ.


Item No.98 Imp. & Dev. of drainage system of 30’ ROW roads in Avtar Enclave & A5B SFS Flats, Shanti Kunj, Paschim Vihar in Rohini Zone.


PART-C

PLACED ON TABLE

Item No.10 Construction of Community Hall on the remaining land of Bara Hindu Rao Dispensary after constructing Poly Clinic.

Reso No. Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letter 163 No.F.33/CTP/NDMC/1089/C&C dated 3.7.2013, be approved.

Reso. No. 164 Resolved that the minutes of the Standing Committee be deemed as confirmed and the Chairman be authorized to sign the minutes later on.

Sd/‐ Sd/‐ Municipal Secretary Chairman Standing Committee

North Delhi Municipal Corporation