44
Ref. book: 1. Engineering Management By Fraidoon Mazda Management:

Notes BK1 Chp2

  • Upload
    ram

  • View
    261

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Operation

Citation preview

  • Ref. book:Engineering Management By Fraidoon Mazda Management:

  • Definitions of ManagementWhat is management?The history of managementTypes of manager Management responsibilitiesManagement tasks The engineering manager

  • What is Management?No single answer Management is the use of techniques, based on measures, artfully applied. Saying:there are those who do things (workers) and those who talk about things (managers) (Incorrect statement)

  • What is management?Scientific ideas usually come from individuals, but it needs a large multi disciplined team to develop it into a product and to take it to market .The activities of this team need to be coordinated and managed.Much greater leverage can be obtained from a well-organized team than by its members working as individuals.

  • What is management?To young engineers

    management may be something they do, a world full of time wasting effort spent mainly on covering up ones mistakes and stabbing peers in the back, thus attempting to reach the top of the corporate ladder . (Fig 2.1)

    This is obviously incorrect impression. Then what is management and how does one become a good manager?

  • One Golden RuleThe one golden rule about management is that there are no golden rules It is not an exact science, like Engineering Tasks are predictable and People are not, and everything in management eventually leads to people 2 + 2 = ?

  • As there are no fixed rulesall that one can hope to do is to learn the basic techniquesthe language of managementand then to be guided by experience, bearing in mind that management requires a constant reappraisal of all that has been learnt, since it is almost certain that changes will occur over time

  • Example How to play football?You cannot learn just reading a book.

    However this is an essential first step: learning the basic principles and rules.

    Reality of management does not fully match the text

  • RememberManagers are not the bossesThey are simple employees, doing a job for which they have acquired certain skillsThe engineer who goes into management expecting to be a leader, to issue commands and have subordinates follow without question, will be disappointed

  • History of managementThe practices of engineering and of management may be considered to have grown hand in hand.

    An Example: Pyramids of Egypt

  • History of managementHowever, as a profession, management is relatively new, if one applies the definition of a professional. In the UK the IEE set up a professional group on Engineering Management in 1970, almost 100 yrs after its birth.The growth of large corporations in the 1950s, particularly multinationals, provided a boost to the professional managementGood working conditions compared with the public sector

  • Definition of a Professional is One having a minimum standard of educational or work achievement, administered by an independent body to which members belong A person with a high degree of knowledge or skill in a particular field

  • Management theory was first popularized in the USA and spread slowly to Europe. The first business school was founded at the University of Philadelphia in 1881 and a hundred years later there were over 500 business schools in the USA.

    How such a growth was in Pakistan?

  • Management techniques have also changed over the years, emphasis on different techniques being largely dictated by the industrial scene at the time.The post war period saw a steady expansion in the developed countries, and the emphasis was on corporate planning for growth The oil crisis of 1973 . Short term payback became the key consideration, not long-term growth.Recent Yrs.X-tics those of both the periods.

  • Types of ManagerManagers come in every shape and size, with very different personalities not surprising, since managers are, after all, human.

    It should also be remembered that all employees within an organization, are in reality managers, being responsible for their own tasks if nothing else.

  • Management levelsOrganization chart Interaction between the various levels of management (fig 2.2)Managers manager Subordinates subordinates Numerous peers, both within the same function and within different functions Usually managers progress up the corporate ladder, in a zigzag fashion

  • Organization's sizethere is debate as to the optimum size for maximum efficiency Figure 2.3

    Material considerations favor large sizesPeople considerations favors much smaller units, critical mass being reached much sooner

  • People considerationsIn large teams there can be many communication problems and time wasted in ensuring that communication occurs smoothly.Staff working on large projects are less able to see the contribution that their individual efforts make towards the organizations goals,The larger the team the greater the amount of overheads it needs, such as supervision and coordination. Organizations may be structured into divisions or profit centers.

  • Management stylesThe style used is often determined by the personality of the manager concerned. Seven styles to be described here

    A manager often displays many of the attributes of these styles. Experienced managers may also vary their style to suite the situation

  • Administrators Very formal in their approach Looks to company rules and regulations for solving all problems Often limited to one level upwards and downwards They are not good at resolving conflict ?In spite of their rather mechanistic approach they are generally respected by their staff, and by peers, for their organizational loyalty and knowledge

  • Time Servers These are generally older managers who have lost interest in their job and environment They take all necessary actions to avoid stress, and maintain a low profile within the company If motivated, they can become a very valuable asset to the organization. They can build an effective team if they try.

  • Climbers driven by extreme personal ambition and will sacrifice everything, including self and family to get to the top pursue personal advancement by fair means or foul However, they become demodulated if this does not show quick results, and this can eventually lead to stress

  • Generals Generals work extremely hard, driving themselves and those under them Usually a younger person who likes to rule and manipulate power but is achievement oriented Usually they are optimistic about the future, sometimes wrongly

  • Supporters usually experienced managers who are knowledgeable in management techniques and apply them where they can They delegate responsibilities The people working under them are highly motivated They get support from the specialists within their department Supporters tend to be loners and do not mix well with peers ?

  • Nice guys These managers are usually weak- willed and are more interested in being liked, by peers and subordinates, than in achieving targets The productivity of the group is low and conflicts waiting to burst out Ready to yield to pressure from almost any source

  • Bosses These managers are bullies! Using power is like a drug They drive the people under them but not themselves They expect recognition from peers, but often do not get it Extremely inflexible, only strong talkers, and hide behind abusive language They can show result for a short-term onlyThey advance by pointing out the mistakes of others, and not by their own achievements

  • A comparisontwo main factors when comparing the strengths of the various styles: People and Tasks Each style has its strengths and weaknesses andeach style has its place in various circumstancesCompartmentalization in Fig 2.4 does not give true picture

  • Management responsibilities The functions that a manager performs are complex, which is partly why it is so difficult to define and record them accurately Managers main task is to deal with other people, and human behavior is complex and difficult to predictGenerally, managers operate in an environment in which they voluntarily accept certain responsibilities as part of their jobs, while being constrained by other factors Fig 2.5

  • Management responsibilitiesThe shareholders expect to receive a return for their investments, measured in terms of dividends and growth Reward to employeesCustomer satisfaction: External & Internal CustomersMarketing Relationship between the organization and its suppliers

  • Management responsibilitiesResponsibility to the communityCompetitorsGovernments acts: Direct and Indirectthe natural environment The labour market, especially in case of skilled labourPressure groups

  • Describe the responsibilities of:A teacherA studentChairman of the DepartmentAssignment

  • Management Tasks4 interrelated groups PlanningOrganizingIntegratingMeasuring

  • Planning Phase Define goals, objectives and policiesStrategic plan: the line of action, to reach the goals SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis must be related back to the set of goalsestablishes processes and sets performance standards, which are used later in the measuring phase. includes budgets, covering expenses, capital and human resources. Training plans and costs have to be includedThese plans also have to be communicated to all involved in the project

  • Two of the key items to be covered during the planning phaseNeed for change (easy or difficult)a change in the political scenea change in the companys policies Process for change the manager should be proactive, foreseeing change and taking early action, rather than reacting to change

  • Organizing Phasesplitting of the work into manageable tasks and allocation to groups or individuals ensure that tasks are coordinated and duplication is avoided Jobs and responsibilities need to be clearly defined (may be difficult due to flexible boundaries and overlaps)teams established and team leaders appointed understand the needs of their customers and ensure that these are communicated to all

  • Integrating Phasesee the whole picture obtain accurate information on which decision is basedRisks must be taken, not avoided (risk management)set the direction, but be flexible enough to change if their decision proves to be wrong, or if circumstances change team members are in communication where their work affects each other eventual goals are kept continually in front of the team and they are motivated to achieve them

  • Measuring Phasetaking stock of achievements and putting in corrective actions, including process changes if necessarymust be taken continually throughout the implementation phase, not only at the end Items that need to be measured and controlled during the project, include:The costs, which include salaries and expensesThe use of skills and specialized equipments Progress on the project, measured on a time-scale The quality of the product

  • The methods for taking measures formal weekly measures chart the informal measures, a manger is continually making throughout the day: MWA, (Management by Walking About), The prime purpose of a measure is to record and provide feed back, resulting in corrective action and process improvement Measurable targets for individuals may be used for growing staff and rewarding them, and not for finding defects and determining punishment

  • Three Common MistakesMeasures are put in place because they are required by the company Managers feel that a poorly performing team reflects badly on them (as a backward class reflects on the quality of the teaching) Managers do not fully trust their staff and apply very tight measures and controls

  • The Engineering ManagerSaying: Management is management; it does not matter whether it is an Engineering department or a grocery shop Feeling: Management requires common sense and nothing moreUnfortunately, many engineers have no planning to take management as a career, (just by promotion) and then a good engineer may not be a good managerManagers must learn to work through other people Dual career ladder ?

  • Engineers vs Engg ManagersTechnical Considerations: Management is creative and complex, as rules are not fixed and environment continually changing Engineers working on technical projects want to be managed by someone who can understand their technical problems and .. Engg managers have to get resources approved for their projects

  • Engineers vs Engg ManagersThe Time factor Engineering tasks require thought and time, e.g. a design spread over monthsEngineering management requires the ability to shift rapidly from one task to the next, from one person to another, often in the space of a few minutesManagers are called upon to maintain an open door policy They cannot shut themselves away for any length of timeTime management Chapter 20

  • Engineers vs Engg ManagersThe people factor An engineer is primarily concerned with tasks while an engineering manager is concerned with people, whether they are within ones direct control or not Engineers find this wasteful of time and would rather do things themselves, something which the engineering manager must never do Managers must delegate technical tasks.Reviews and discussions with staff should not be limited to tasks, but should cover personnel issues as well, such as development A manager cannot poach staff from another department Engineering managers must plan for product failure and be able to reorganize their team when it occurs

  • Assignments Show the management behaviour in the form of flow chart, As you see it in university.History of growth in Engg Management in Pakistan? Describe the responsibilities of:A teacherA studentChairman of the DepartmentCase studies: