Notes for Volume One - paragonian.orgparagonian.org/pdf_files/wholeness/notes_irl.pdf365 Notes for Volume One PROLOGUE: SETTING OUT Motto: Source not known. 1. T. S. Eliot, ‘Little

365

Notes for Volume One

PROLOGUE: SETTING OUT

Motto: Source not known. 1. T. S. Eliot, ‘Little Gidding’, Four Quartets, available on the Web. 2. Codd, ‘A Relational Model of Data’. 3. Tarnas, Passion of the Western Mind, p. 45. 4. Rees, Our Final Century, p. 19. 5. Boole, ‘Indian Thought’, pp. 952–953. 6. De Morgan, On the Syllogism, Heath introduction, p. xxiv. 7. Peirce, Writings, 1857–1866, pp. 166–167. 8. Bertrand Russell, letter to Gottlob Frege, 19th June 1902, in van Heijenoort, From Frege

to Gödel, p. 124. 9. Gregory, Oxford Companion to the Mind, concept, pp. 157–158. 10. Berg, Power of Kabbalah, pp. 14 and 19. 11. Codd, ‘A Relational Model of Data’, p. 377. 12. Davis and Hersh, Descartes’ Dream, pp. 3–4. 13. Brent, Charles Sanders Peirce, p. 323. 14. Peirce, Essential Peirce, vol. 1, pp. 246–247. MS 909, first published in Peirce, Collected

Papers, 1.1, p. vii. Also published in Peirce, Writings, vol. 6, 1886–1890, pp. 166–169. 15. http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~mm/. 16. Brent, Charles Sanders Peirce, pp. 279–288. 17. Peirce, ‘Immortality in the Light of Synechism’, in Essential Peirce, vol. 2, p. 3, first

published in Collected Papers, vol. VII, ref CP 7.565–578, submitted for publication on 4thMay 1893, but not published due to a misunderstanding.

18. Brent, Charles Sanders Peirce, p. 213. 19. Ibid., p. 340. 20. Rees, Our Final Century, pp. 146–147. 21. National Geographic, The Death of the Universe, National Geographic Channel, 2008. 22. James, ‘Is Life Worth Living?’ in Will to Believe, pp. 43–44.

366 NOTES: PROLOGUE: SETTING OUT, NO. 23.

23. Jung et al, Man and His Symbols, Dell, 1968, pp. 3–4. 24. Jung, Role of the Unconscious, para. 11–13, pp. 9–10. 25. Osho, Hidden Harmony, p. 1. 26. Aristotle, Metaphysics, Books I-IX, 1005b20, pp. 161 & 163. 27. Encyclopedia of Philosophy, article on ‘Heraclitus of Ephesus’, p. 477. 28. Revelation, 22:13. 29. Lao Tzu, Tao Teh Ching, ch. 2, p. 5. 30. Ibid., ch. 62, p. 127. 31. Ibid., ch. 70, p. 143. 32. Ibid., ch. 56, p. 115. 33. Teilhard, Human Phenomenon, pp. 183–188 & 191–194. 34. Kurzweil, Singularity, p. 7. 35. Easwaran, tr., Bhagavad Gita, Harmondsworth, pp. 151 and 156. 36. Maslow, ‘Jonah Syndrome’. 37. Becker, Denial of Death, p. 49. 38. Levy, Madness of George W. Bush, p. 142. 39. Grimal, Dictionary of Classical Mythology, p. 343. 40. Campbell, Hero, p. 30. 41. Ibid., p. 259. 42. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBUvZDSY2D0. 43. Rees, Our Final Century, pp. 8 and vii. 44. Krishnamurti, Education, p. 14. 45. Smuts, Holism and Evolution, p. v. 46. Ibid., p. 99. 47. Lovejoy, Great Chain of Being. 48. Wilber, Up from Eden, pp. 9–10. 49. Aurobindo, ‘Involution and Evolution’, p. 73. 50. Tolle, Power of Now, p. 40. 51. Aristotle, Metaphysics, 1073a27, p. 153. 52. Aquinas, Summa Theologiæ, pp. 12–14. 53. Alan Turing, ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Mind, LIX, No. 236, 1950,

reprinted in Hofstadter & Dennett, The Mind’s I, pp. 53–67. 54. M. V. Wilkes and W. Renwick, ‘The EDSAC’, reproduced in Randell, Origins of Dig-

ital Computers, pp. 417–421. 55. Fromm, To Have or To Be? pp. 171–172. 56. Plato, Protagoras, 343b, p. 51.

NOTES: PROLOGUE: SETTING OUT, NO. 90. 367

57. Watkins, American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots, language and culturenote for dhghem-, p. 20.

58. Pagels, Beyond Belief, p. 170. 59. Ibid., p. 80. 60. Ibid., p. 251. 61. John 1:7 and 14. 62. Pagels, Beyond Belief, p. 58. 63. Fromm, Sane Society, first two chapter headings. 64. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust. 65. Robertson, Future Work, p. 126. 66. Vimala Thakar, Spirituality and Social Action, p. 13. 67. Turing, ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, pp. 57 and 66–67 68. Woolley, The Bride of Science, p. 69. 69. Lovelace, ‘Sketch of the Analytical Engine’, p. 284. 70. Peirce, ‘Logical Machines’, New Elements of Mathematics, Volume 3, pp. 625 and 630,

originally published in American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 165–170, November 1887. 71. Krishnamurti, Education and the Significance of Life, p. 79. 72. Turing, ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, pp. 53–54. 73. http://www.loebner.net/Prizef/loebner-prize.html. 74. Paramahansa Yogananda, Autobiography of a Yogi, p. 3. 75. http://royalsociety.org/about-us/history/. 76. Teilhard, Human Phenomenon, p. 172. 77. Ibid., pp. 216–218. 78. Codd, ‘A Relational Model of Data’. 79. Baron, Computer Languages, pp. 346–347. 80. Schumacher, Guide for the Perplexed, p. 15. 81. pansophy, Oxford English Dictionary (OED), second edition on CD-ROM (v. 4.0),

Oxford University Press, 2009. 82. Ryle, Concept of Mind, pp. 17–24 83. Ibid., pp. 17–18. 84. Koestler, Ghost in the Machine, p. 3. 85. Happold, Mysticism pp. 71–72. 86. Pagels, Adam, Eve, and the Serpent, p. 65. 87. http://www.angsbacka.com/festivals/no-mind-festival/. 88. Ramana Maharshi, Talks, p. 100. 89. Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, p. 1. 90. Aerts, et al, World Views.


91. Krishnamurti, Education and the Significance of Life, p. 18. 92. Blau, Krishnamurti, p. 159. 93. Happold, Mysticism, p. 72. 94. Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, p. 18. 95. Aurobindo, Life Divine, p. 141. 96. Descartes, Meditations, p. 156. 97. Ibid., p. 105. 98. Ibid., p. 98. 99. Magee, Great Philosophers, p. 86 100. Berg, Power of Kabbalah, p. 250. 101. Plato, Republic, 472c, p. 261. 102. Aristotle, Prior Analytics, 24b17, p. 201. 103. Aristotle, Metaphysics, Books I-IX, 1003a20, p. 147. 104. McTaggart, The Field, pp. 235–257. 105. McTaggart, The Bond, pp. 161–184. 106. Blau, Krishnamurti, p. 85. 107. Way, tr., Cloud of Unknowing, p. 17. 108. Balsekar, Consciousness Speaks, p. i. 109. Julian Huxley, foreword to Teilhard, Phenomenon of Man, p. 21. 110. Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, p. 48. 111. David Chalmers, ‘Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness’, Journal of Con-

sciousness Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1995, pp. 200–219. 112. Jung, Analytical Psychology, p. 6. 113. Attenborough, Life on Earth, p. 20. 114. Times Atlas, p. 31. 115. Russell, Awakening Earth, p. 34. 116. Kurzweil, et al., Are We Spiritual Machines?, p. 11. 117. Victor Venge, ‘The Technological Singularity’, available at http://mindstalk.net/

vinge/vinge-sing.html. 118. Moravec, Robot, p. 126. 119. Moravec, Mind Children, p. 1. 120. Moravec, Robot, p. 125. 121. McKenna, Invisible Landscape, pp. 109–117. 122. Metzner, Expansion of Consciousness, p. 25. 123. McKenna, Invisible Landscape, pp. 189–190. 124. Whitehead, Process and Reality, p. 21. 125. McKenna, Invisible Landscape, pp. 140–149 and 211–220.

NOTES: PROLOGUE: SETTING OUT, NO. 153. 369

126. Ibid., p. 171. 127. David Paul Boaz, The Noetic Revolution Toward an Integral Science of Matter, Mind

and Spirit, pdf file at http://www.davidpaulboaz.org, 2011. 128. Teilhard, Human Phenomenon, p. 173. 129. Ibid., p. 265n. 130. Planck, Scientific Autobiography, pp. 33–34, quoted in Kuhn, Scientific Revolutions,

p. 151. 131. Blake, Illuminated Books, p. 88. 132. Thakar, Spirituality and Social Action, p. 3–4. 133. Eckhart Tolle, Stillness Speaks: Whispers of Now, London: Hodder Mobius, Hodder

& Stoughton, 2003, p. xii. 134. Toynbee, Study of History, abridgement of vols I–VI, p. 246. 135. Koestler, Ghost in the Machine, p. 165. 136. Ibid., p. 163. 137. Ibid., p. 165. 138. Ibid., pp. 164–165. 139. Koestler, Sleepwalkers, p. 51. 140. Tolle, New Earth, p. 138. 141. Ibid., p. 309. 142. Osho, Philosophia Perennis, Volume 2, Chapter 2, ‘Zorba The Buddha’, 1st January

1979. 143. Osho, The Golden Future, Session 32, ‘The New Man: The Very Salt of the Earth’,

Cologne: Germany: Rebel Publishing House, 1987, p. 297. 144. Barbara Marx Hubbard, letter in What is Enlightenment? Issue 31, December-Febru-

ary 2005/2006, p. 9. 145. Aristotle, Physics, ‘The Scope of Natural Science’, 193b22, p. 36. 146. Koestler, Sleepwalkers, p. 460. 147. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_New_Sciences. 148. http://www.infed.org/archives/e-texts/bohm_dialogue.htm. 149. David Bohm, On Dialogue, edited by Lee Nichol, London: Routledge, 1996, p. vii. 150. Anthony Storr, Solitude, first published in 1988 as The School of Genius, London:

HarperCollinsPublishers, p. ix. 151. Zeigeist: Addendum, The Zeitgeist Movement, 2008, movie freely available from

http://www.zeitgeistaddendum.com/. 152. What is Enlightenment? magazine, Issue 38, October-December 2007, p. 88. 153. Grof, ‘Spectrum Psychology’, section ‘Omission of the Pre- and Perinatal Domain

in Spectrum Psychology’, 89–94.


154. Wilber, Integral Life Practice, pp. xvii and xv. 155. Wilber, Integral Spirituality, p. 6. 156. Cohen, Evolutionary Enlightenment, p. 88. 157. What is Enlightenment? magazine, Issue 38, October–December 2007, p. 88. 158. Wilber, Sex, Ecology, Spirituality, pp. 279–310. 159. Wilber, Integral Spirituality, Figure 2.4, between pp. 68 & 69. 160. de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, section ‘Tyranny of the Majority’, pp. 250–

253. 161. Mill, On Liberty, pp. 51–52. 162. Phipps, Evolutionaries, p. 32. 163. Campbell, Hero, p. 36. 164. Ibid., pp. 36–37. 165. Ibid., p. 193. 166. Cohen, Freedom Has No History, p. 103. 167. Cohen, Evolutionary Enlightenment, p. 4. 168. Ibid., pp. 4–5. 169. Hafner and Lyon, Where Wizards Stay Up Late, p. 53. 170. Wilber, Theory of Everything, p. xii. 171. Ibid. 172. de Quincey, ‘A Theory of Everything?’, p. 15. 173. Kline, Mathematics, p. 262. 174. Korzybski, Science and Society, p. 58. 175. Whitehead and Russell, Principia Mathematica. 176. Wilber, Integral Spirituality, p. 2. 177. Ibid., pp. 30–31. 178. Ibid., pp. 2–3. 179. Ibid., pp. 31–32. 180. http://www.arlingtoninstitute.org/wbp. 181. Petersen, A Vision for 2012, p. 6. 182. John Petersen, interview with Carter Phipps, EnlightenNext, Issue 44, June-August

2009, p. 72. 183. John Petersen, ‘The End of the World As We Know It?’, interview in What Is En-

lightenment?, Issue 37, July-September 2007, p. 29. 184. http://noetic.org/library/audio-lectures/stewards-of-transition-with-angeles-arrien-

part-1/. 185. Grof, The Stormy Search for the Self. 186. Greene, Elegant Universe, p. ix.

NOTES: INTEGRAL RELATIONAL LOGIC, NO. 2. 371

187. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/einstein_symphony_prog_summary.shtml.

188. Einstein, Relativity, pp. 19–20. 189. Ibid., p. 66. 190. Basil Hiley, ‘Infinite Potential: The Legacy of David Bohm’, conference on 21st No-

vember 2009 at Queen Mary College, London, organized by the Scientific and Medical Net-work.

191. Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, p. 176. 192. Steve Jones, The Gene Code, Part 2: Unlocking the Code, introduced by Adam Ruth-

erford, BBC, 2011, http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b010nn6y. 193. Rees, Our Final Century, p. 152. quote from Maddox, What Remains to Be Discovered,

no page mentioned. 194. Thich Nhat Hanh, Old Path White Clouds (Berkeley, CA: Parallax, 1991), 465. 195. Lao Tzu, Tao Teh Ching, trans. John C. H. Wu (Boston, MA: Shambhala. 1961), 1. 196. Wholeness and the Implicate Order, p. 29. 197. Made famous in his statement, “one cannot step twice into the same river”, quoted

by Plutarch in De E apud Delphous 392B, Thought of Heraclitus, Kahn, pp. 52–53. 198. Process and Reality. 199. Ibid., pp. 27–47. Bohm points out that rheo derives from a Greek verb [rein] ‘to flow’

(p. 31). 200. I cannot find this phrase in Bohm’s writings. I suspect that I heard it from him dur-

ing one of our conversations on the use of language during the 1980s. 201. A notable exception was Heraclitus, who said, “Nature (phusis) loves to hide” Kahn,

Heraclitus, pp. 33 and 105. That is, nature is not to be found in the superficial, but by goingdeep into the essence of forms and structures.

202. See, for instance, Reese, Bridge. 203. Goren, Precision System. 204. Moss, British-American Dictionary. 205. Chambers Dictionary of Quotations, p. 926: 41.

PART I. INTEGRAL RELATIONAL LOGIC

Motto: (p. 3) De Bono, Use of Lateral Thinking, p. 129. 1. (p. 4) Fromm, ToHave or To Be?, p. 171. 2. (p. 4) I first became fully aware of this crisis when attending ‘The President’s Class’ run

by lecturers from the Harvard Business School at IBM’s Advanced Marketing Institute nearBrussels in August 1976. Two of the papers that were distributed were ‘Plight of the EDP

372 NOTES: INTEGRAL RELATIONAL LOGIC, NO. 3.

manager’ and ‘Business needs a new breed of EDP manager’, both by Richard L. Nolan, pub-lished in the Harvard Business Review, May–June 1973 and March–April 1976, respectively.

3. (p. 5) IBM changed its name from Computing-Tabulating-Recording Co. to Interna-tional Business Machines Corporation on 13th February 1924. As Thomas J. Watson, thenPresident and General Manager, wrote to its members, “We are confident that this change inname will be beneficial to the business, and that the members of our field organization willfind it of direct value in introducing our company and the products which we manufactureand distribute.” ‘IBM: A Special Company’, Think, September 1989, p. 22.

4. (p. 5) Nora and Minc, Computerization of Society, p. 72. The dominance of IBM wasof particular concern to the authors, who devoted several pages to just this one issue.

5. (p. 6) These figures came from a journal I read, most probably in the 1980s, but I don’tremember which.

6. (p. 8) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_IBM. 7. (p. 11) Harvard Business Review on Knowledge Management (Boston: Harvard Business

School Publishing, 1987). 8. (p. 11) Senge, The Fifth Discipline. 9. (p. 11) In 1979, when I had the responsibility for marketing personal computing and

the information centre in IBM marketing head office in London, some of the articles we wereusing in introducing this change in perception in customers’ minds were ‘Managing the crisesin data processing’ by Richard L. Nolan, ‘Chief executives define their own data needs’, bothpublished in Harvard Business Review, March–April 1979, ‘Get ready for major changes’,‘How to prepare for coming changes’, ‘Computer support for managers’, and ‘What infor-mation do managers need?, all published in the EDP Analyzer, November 1978 Vol 16 No. 11,April 1979 Vol 17 No. 4, May 1979 Vol 17 No 5, and June 1979 Vol 17 No 6, and ‘DP’s roleis changing’ by C. W. Getz and ‘The changing face of application programming’ by DanielD. McCracken, published in Datamation, February 1978 and November 15th, 1978.

10. (p. 11) Some of the influential books on the microcomputer revolution published inthe UK around 1980 were Barron and Curnow, The Future with Microelectronics, Evans, TheMighty Micro, Jones, Microelectronics and Society, Large, The Micro Revolution, and Pask andCurran, Micro Man.

11. (p. 11) Martin, Wired Society, pp. 91–92. 12. (p. 11) Bell, ‘The Social Framework of the Information Society’, in Dertouzos and

Moses, Computer Age, p. 173. 13. (p. 12) Metzner, Roots of War, p. 27. 14. (p. 12) Ibid., pp. 40–41. This insight came from what was purported to be a ‘secret

government report’, called Report from Iron Mountain: On the Possibility & Desirability ofPeace, available on the Web at http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/

NOTES: INTEGRAL RELATIONAL LOGIC, NO. 31. 373

iron_mountain_full.htm. However, this turned out to be hoax, investigating the dire con-sequences of ‘permanent peace’ on the United States’ economic and social stability. It wasapparently written by a consortium of peace-movement intellectuals, including John Ken-neth Galbraith, who makes a similar point in Money. The key sentence from this report, was“War … is itself the principal basis of organization on which all modern societies are con-structed.” And so if we could ever learn to live in love and peace with each other, radical po-litical and economic changes would be needed.

15. (p. 12) Ibid., p. 17. 16. (p. 12) In 1989, IBM published a glossy issue of its in-house magazine Think called

‘IBM: A Special Company’. 17. (p. 13) Lane, Industrial Revolution, pp. 24–25. 18. (p. 13) Jones, ‘A New Society?’ in Jones, Microelectronics and Society , pp. 150–151. 19. (p. 13) Bell, Information Society, pp. 184–185. 20. (p. 14) Thomas J. Watson coined this motto at an NCR sales meeting in 1911, and

was seen throughout IBM’s premises by the 1930s. ‘IBM, A Special Company’, Think, Sep-tember 1989, p. 28.

21. (p. 15) Smith, Adam, Wealth of Nations, p. 8. 22. (p. 17) Anthony, Planning and Control Systems, pp. 15–19. 23. (p. 17) Keen and Scott Morton, Decision Support Systems, pp. 11–12. 24. (p. 17) Ibid., p. 87. 25. (p. 18) Simon, Management Decision, pp. 45. 26. (p. 19) Ibid., p. 6. 27. (p. 19) Codd, ‘Relational Model of Data’, p. 377. 28. (p. 20) The process-entity matrix was not actually a BSP one. It is taken from another

business modelling method developed in IBM(UK) called Systems Development Method(SDM). This example is taken from the manual Business Model: Processes p. 43, dated 10/10 83.

29. (p. 24) OED. 30. (p. 24) I know this because the rather battered copy of the Concise Oxford Dictionary

of Current English that was my primary dictionary in 1980 did not contain the word synergy. 31. (p. 25) The pub is an attractive old inn that had been on the south side of the common

since around 1776 called ‘The Crooked Billet’. A billet was a bent branch from a tree, an ex-ample of a distinctive object that publicans hung or stood outside pubs to identify their es-tablishment before painted inn signs became commonplace(http://www.thecrookedbilletwimbledon.com/history.php and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pub_names).

Wimbledon Common and its neighbouring Putney Heath are a unique location just tenkilometres from the centre of London. To protect the Commons from being enclosed or built

374 NOTES: STARTING AFRESH AT THE VERY BEGINNING, NO. 32.

on, in 1871 an Act of Parliament was passed decreeing that these 1140 acres (461 hectares)should “forever remain open, uninclosed and unbuilt upon, for the purpose of recreation andexercise” (Drakeford and Sutcliffe, p. 2).

At the time of my life-changing eureka moment, I was at map reference TQ228729 in theco-ordinates of the rectangular grid developed by the Ordnance Survey in Great Britain, es-tablished in 1791. This position, which is close to the Tangier war memorial, is 51° 26' 30"N, 0° 15' 0" W to within about five seconds of angular measure. I proposed to my secondwife Berit from Norway on this spot on Good Friday 1986.

32. (p. 26) I had been introduced to catastrophe theory by a colleague during a flying visitto IBM’s European head office in December 1979. It seems that by this time I was no longerkeeping my concerns about the psychological and economic issues of society’s growing de-pendency on information technology a complete secret. I must have mentioned my concernsto someone I could trust, but whose name I forget now.

33. (p. 26) Woodcock and Davis, Catastrophe Theory, p. 58. 34. (p. 28) Einstein, Relativity, p. 1. 35. (p. 29) The most familar standards in this respect are ISO 9000 and ISO 14000,

which address quality and environmental management, respectively, which are implementedby over a million organizations in 175 countries (http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/management_standards/iso_9000_iso_14000.htm).

36. (p. 31) IBM withdrew APL Data Interface-II for VM/370 CMS, program productnumber 5796-PNG, on 31st December 1997. Announcement Letter Number, 997-251,September 30, 1997.

37. (p. 32) See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Architect_(software) and http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/systemarchitect/.

38. (p. 32) King, Spirit of Fire, pp. 170–174. 39. (p. 33) Genesis, 1:1–2. 40. (p. 33) Revelations, 22:13. 41. (p. 33) Fischer-Schreiber, et al, Encyclopedia of Eastern Philosophy and Religion, article

on Shankaracharya.

CHAPTER 1. STARTING AFRESH AT THE VERY BEGINNING

Motto: (p. 35) Much quoted, but unknown source 1. (p. 35) Plato, Protagoras, 343b, p. 51. The references for Thales as the first philosopher

and Greek geometer are Russell, Western Philosophy, p. 44 and Heath, Greek Mathematics,Vol. 1, p. 128.

2. (p. 37) Wells, Country of the Blind, pp. 322–347. 3. (p. 39) Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, p. 1.

NOTES: STARTING AFRESH AT THE VERY BEGINNING, NO. 33. 375

4. (p. 39) Teilhard, Human Phenomenon, p. 172. 5. (p. 39) Krishnamurti, Education, p. 18. 6. (p. 40) Storr, Human Aggression, p. 9. 7. (p. 40) Ramana Maharshi, Spiritual Teaching, p. 5 and Talks, p. 100. 8. (p. 41) American Heritage Dictionary. 9. (p. 41) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphany_(feeling). 10. (p. 41) Chapman was George Chapman (c. 1559–1634), an English dramatist, transla-

tor, and poet, best remembered for his translations of Homer's Iliad, Odyssey, and Batracho-myomachia. I was required to learn Keat’s poem by heart as a teenager, something that I wasvery reluctant to do. Nevertheless, there was something about these words that resonated verydeeply within me. It was only in the early 1980s that their full meaning became clear as theresult of my own epiphany.

11. (p. 42) Miller and C'de Baca, Quantum Change, pp. 4 and 7–8. 12. (p. 42) Ibid., pp. 18–19. 13. (p. 42) Ibid., pp. 20–21. 14. (p. 43) Ibid., p. 181. 15. (p. 43) Fortson, Indo-European Language and Culture, p. 7. 16. (p. 44) Fischer-Schreiber, Encyclopedia, article on Smriti, pp. 335–336. 17. (p. 45) Ibid., articles on Smriti and Eightfold path. 18. (p. 45) Nhat Hanh, Miracle of Mindfulness, Translator’s Preface by Mobi Ho, pp. vii–

viii. 19. (p. 45) Fischer-Schreiber, Encyclopedia, article on Skandha, p. 335. 20. (p. 45) Nhat Hanh, Miracle of Mindfulness, pp. 11, 48, and 46. 21. (p. 45) Ibid., pp. 56 and 59. 22. (p. 45) Ibid., pp. 12 and 41. 23. Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, p. 18. 24. http://www.umassmed.edu/Content.aspx?id=43102. 25. Kabat-Zinn, Wherever You Go, p. 4. 26. Marlatt and Kristeller, ‘Mindfulness and Meditation’, p. 68. 27. Goldstein and Kornfield, Seeking the Heart of Wisdom, p. 62. 28. Bishop, et al. ‘Mindfulness’, p. 232. 29. Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, pp. 27–32. 30. Whorf, Language, Thought, and Reality. 31. The Language of Spirituality: Modern Science Meets Ancient Wisdom, a film by Anthony

Dellaflora. DVD, Taos Communications Empire, 2005. 32. Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, p. 36. 33. Wilber, Integral Spirituality, pp. 2–3.


34. IBM, Object-Oriented Interface Design, p. 11. 35. From an earlier edition of the previous book. 36. Apple, Human Interface Guidelines, p. 3. 37. Ibid., p. 2. 38. Petri, ‘Modelling as a Communication Discipline’, p. 439. 39. Sowa, Conceptual Structures, p. 30. 40. Ibid. 41. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov. 42. Koestler, Ghost in the Machine, p. 15, 14, and 7. 43. Miller, ‘Cognitive Revolution, p. 1412. 44. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00s2w83. 45. Brotton, History of the World in Twelve Maps, p. 13. 46. Ibid., p. 4. 47. Harvey, Mappa Mundi, p. 3. 48. http://www.foliosociety.com/book/HMM/hereford-world-map-mappa-mundi. 49. Harvey, Mappa Mundi, pp. 54 and 7. 50. Ibid., pp. 54 and 22. 51. Brotton, History of the World in Twelve Maps, p. 19. 52. Sayings 8, 21, 24, 63, 65, and 96 in the Gospel of Thomas (Pagels, Beyond Belief, pp.

228–239 and Matthew 11:15, 13:9, and 13:43, Mark 4:9, 4:23, and 7:16, and Luke 8:8 and 14:35. 53. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dnc-2012-obamas-speech-to-the-demo-

cratic-national-convention-full-transcript/2012/09/06/ed78167c-f87b-11e1-a073-78d05495927c_story_1.html.

54. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/transcript-bill-clintons-democratic-conven-tion-speech/story?id=17164662&page=6#.UEw4LkLvJsQ.

55. Crane, Mercator, pp. 1 and 34–35. 56. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Provinces. 57. Crane, Mercator, pp. 44–45. 58. Monmonier, Rhumb Lines, p. 37. 59. Crane, Mercator, pp. 77 and 135–142. 60. Mercator, Gerardus, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008. 61. Monmonier, Rhumb Lines, pp. 1–7. 62. Sobel, Longitude, pp. 53, 8–9, among others. 63. Times Atlas, p. 44. 64. Brotton, History of the World in Twelve Maps, p. 12. 65. Monmonier, Rhumb Lines, p. 145–153. 66. Mercator, Gerardus, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008.


67. Monmonier, Rhumb Lines, pp. 41–42. 68. Grimal, Dictionary of Classical Mythology, Atlas, p. 68. 69. Plato, Critias, 24c, p. 102 and Timaeus, 113d–114b, p. 15. 70. Herodotus, Histories, book 4, paragraph 184, p. 297. 71. Grimal, Dictionary of Classical Mythology, Uranus, p. 463. 72. Mercator, Atlas, pp. 34–35. 73. Ibid., pp. 35–37. 74. Monmonier, Rhumb Lines, p. 41. 75. Grimal, Dictionary of Classical Mythology, Uranus, p. 463. 76. Cohen, Freedom Has No History, p. 103. 77. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Abjuration and /Dutch_Republic. 78. Crane, Mercator, pp. 288–289. 79. Brotton, History of the World in Twelve Maps, p. 265. 80. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Klencke. 81. (p. 66) Times Atlas, pp. 20–23. 82. (p. 66) http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/Sciences/Astronomy/TheUniverse/

Timekeepingandthecelestial/StarMaps/starmap-large.gif. 83. (p. 67) http://www.chromoscope.net/. 84. ‘(p. 67) Planck telescope reveals ancient cosmic light’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/

science_and_environment/10501154.stm. 85. (p. 69) Kelley, The Home Planet, frontispiece. 86. (p. 69) http://www.noetic.org/about/history.cfm. 87. (p. 69) Oxford English Dictionary Second Edition on CD-ROM (v. 4.0), 2009, Article

on universe. 88. (p. 70) Lao Tzu, Tao Teh Ching, Chapter 1, p. 1. 89. (p. 70) White, Isaac Newton, p. 106. 90. (p. 71) Huxley, A., The Perennial Philosophy, Harper & Row, Perennial, 1970. 91. (p. 71) Korzybski, Science and Sanity, p. 58. 92. (p. 71) Chalmers, What Is This Thing Called Science? 93. (p. 72) Koestler, The Sleepwalkers, p. 502. 94. (p. 72) Katie, Loving What Is, p. 15. 95. (p. 72) Forrester, Industrial Dynamics, Urban Dynamics, and World Dynamics. 96. (p. 72) Meadows, et al, Limits to Growth. 97. (p. 72) Forrester, World Dynamics, p. 14. 98. (p. 73) Ibid., p. 123. 99. (p. 73) Weizenbaum, ‘The Computer Revolution’, in Dertouzos and Moses, Comput-

er Age, pp. 446–447. The quotation is from United States, Congress, House, Committee on


Banking and Currency, Hearings before the Subcommittee on Urban Growth, October 7,1970, 91st Congress, 2nd session, pp. 205–265.

100. (p. 73) Ibid., pp. 445 and 447. 101. (p. 73) Schumacher, Guide for the Perplexed, p. 15. 102. (p. 73) Escher and Locher, World of M.C. Escher, p. 102. 103. (p. 74) Christian de Quincey, ‘A Theory of Everything? A Critical Appreciation of

Ken Wilber’s Collected Works’, Noetic Sciences Review, March-May 2001, No. 55, p. 15. 104. (p. 74) Blau, Krishnamurti, p. 159. 105. (p. 74) Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, p. 18. 106. (p. 75) Krishnamurti, Awakening of Intelligence. 107. (p. 75) Rouse Ball and Coxeter, Mathematical Recreations, pp. 241–254. I first read

this book in 1959, having received it for winning the school mathematics prize for the previousyear.

108. (p. 76) Adrian Fisher, The Amazing Book of Mazes, London: Thames & Hudson,2006, pp. 7–9.

109. (p. 76) Coxeter, Regular Polytopes, p. 14. 110. (p. 76) Ibid. 111. (p. 76) Ibid., pp. 133–136. 112. (p. 77) Ibid., p. 119. 113. (p. 77) Hawking, Brief History of Time, p. 162. 114. (p. 77) Robin McKie, ‘String theory: Is it science’s ultimate dead end?’, http://ob-

server.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1890340,00.html. 115. (p. 77) Codd, ‘A Relational Model of Data’. 116. (p. 78) Aristotle, Prior Analytics, p. 201. 117. (p. 78) Chen, ‘The Entity-Relational Model’. 118. (p. 78) Baron, Computer Languages, pp. 346–355. 119. (p. 78) Plato, Republic, 472c, p. 261. 120. (p. 78) Booch, Jacobson, and Rumbaugh, Unified Modeling Language. 121. (p. 78) Scott, Programming Language Pragmatics, p. 6. 122. (p. 78) http://www.sungard.com/positioncontrol. 123. Kline, Mathematics in Western Culture, pp. 28–29. 124. Ibid., pp. 35 and 54. 125. Academy, Encyclopaedia Britannica. 126. Alexandria, Encyclopaedia Britannica. 127. Kline, Mathematics in Western Culture, p. 60. 128. Ibid., pp. 61–63. 129. http://eclipse99.nasa.gov/pages/traditions_Calendars.html.


130. Hawking, Brief History of Time, p. 168. 131. Rees, Our Final Century, pp. 145 and 148. 132. (p. 81) Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity, pp. 3–6. 133. Robertson, Future Work, p. 100. 134. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Math. 135. Kline, Mathematics: Loss of Certainty, p. 281. 136. Rees, Our Final Century, p. 153. 137. Coxeter and Greitzer, Geometry Revisited, pp. 132–136. 138. These figures and other similar ones in this book have been generated by Great Stella,

an amazingly brilliant program designed and written by Robert Webb in Australia. The mostcomprehensive guides to making cardboard models of polyhedra, their duals, and sphericalcorrelates are Polyhedron Models, Dual Models, and Spherical Models by Magnus Wenninger,a Benedictine monk.

139. Coxeter and Greitzer, Geometry Revisited, pp. 103–131. 140. The PowerPoint presentation derived from the paper was called ‘How to Talk Non-

dually about Math without Sounding Ludicrous: Existence, Infinity, Truth (and JapaneseTemple Geometry)’. Newcomb kindly gave me copies of both his paper and presentation af-ter his talk. I don’t know if they are generally available.

141. Hidetoshi and Rothman, Sacred Mathematics, Plate 12. 142. Frederick Soddy, ‘The Kiss Precise’, Nature Vol. 137, 1936, p. 1021 and Nature Vol.

139, 1937, p. 62. 143. Coxeter, ‘The Problem of Apollonius’, p. 5. 144. Heath, Greek Mathematics, Vol. 2, p. 182. 145. Coxeter, ‘The Problem of Apollonius’, p. 5. 146. Lachlan, Pure Geometry, pp. 232 and 253 and http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Casey-

sTheorem.html. 147. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey%27s_theorem and http://en.wikipedia.org/

wiki/Ptolemy%27s_theorem. 148. http://www.geogebra.org. 149. Hidetoshi and Rothman, Sacred Mathematics, pp. 328–329. 150. Capra, Turning Point, p. 68. 151. OED gives Psychiatrisch-Neurologische Wochenschrift, Nos. 18–21, 1910–11 as the first

occurrence of Ambivalenz. 152. Winnicott, ‘Book review: Memories, Dreams, Reflections’. 153. Casement, ‘Psychodynamic Therapy’ p. 82. 154. Aristotle, Metaphysics, Books I-IX, 1005b20, pp. 161 & 163. 155. Encyclopedia of Philosophy, article on ‘Heraclitus of Ephesus’, p. 477.


156. Revelation, 22:13. Also, similar statements at Revelation, 1:8, 1:11, and 21:6, the onlyplaces where the words Alpha and Omega appear in the Bible.

157. Osho, Hidden Harmony, p. 1. 158. Lao Tzu, Tao Teh Ching, ch. 2, p. 5. 159. Ibid., ch. 62, p. 127. 160. Ibid., ch. 70, p. 143. 161. Ibid., ch. 56, p. 115. 162. idealism, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008. 163. Stern, Hegel, p. 8. 164. Ibid., p. 11. 165. Kapp, Rigmaroles, article on weave, p. 127. 166. Ibid., article on warp, p. 126. 167. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weft. 168. Ryle, Concept of Mind, p. 17. 169. Koestler, Ghost in the Machine, p. 202. 170. Hegel, Phänomenologie des Geistes, p. 363, the first paragraph in the chapter on Reli-

gion, provides an example. 171. Hegel, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008. 172. McLellan, Karl Marx, p. 16. 173. Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, p. 39. 174. Turchin, Inertia of Fear, p. 43. 175. Fischer, Marx, pp. 15 and 31. 176. McLellan, Karl Marx, pp. 7–8. 177. Shakespeare, ‘As You Like It’, Act II, Scene 7, Collected Works, p. 289. 178. Houston, ‘Jump Time’, pp. 344–349. 179. Laing, Voice of Experience, p. 9. 180. Laing, Politics of Experience, p. 34. 181. Spira, Transparency of Things, p. 7. 182. (p. 100) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naphthalene. 183. (p. 100) Boswell, Samuel Johnson, p. 186. Johnson and Boswell were dining with

Richard Owen Cambridge on 18th April 1775 and on being shown the library, Johnson im-mediately started looking at the indexes at the back of the books. He explained what was re-garded as strange behaviour with his much-quoted statement about knowledge andinformation, followed by “When we enquire into any subject, the first thing we have to do isto know what books have treated of it. This leads us to look at catalogues, and at the backs ofbooks in libraries.” In today’s Information Age, we call such a rational approach to informa-tion management library or information science.


184. Grof, Spiritual Emergency and The Stormy Search for the Self. 185. (p. 102) de Bono, Lateral Thinking, p. 31. 186. (p. 103) Bohm, Causality and Chance, pp. 41–45. 187. (p. 103) de Bono, Lateral Thinking, p. 32. 188. (p. 104) Bohm, Wholeness, pp. 114. 189. (p. 104) Strong, Concordance of Bible, #894 in Hebrew-Aramaic Index. 190. (p. 104) Genesis, 11:1. 191. (p. 104) Genesis, 11:4. 192. (p. 105) Dowd, Children of Abraham, TV series, part I. 193. (p. 105) Genesis, 11:9. (See also Glossary.) 194. http://www.computer50.org/mark1/new.baby.html. See also F. C. Williams and T.

Kilburn, ‘Electronic Digital Computers’, reproduced in Randell, Origins of Digital Comput-ers, pp. 415–416.

195. M. V. Wilkes and W. Renwick, ‘The EDSAC’, reproduced in Randell, Origins ofDigital Computers, pp. 417–421.

196. (p. 105) Turing, ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, 53. 197. (p. 105) Turing, ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, 57. 198. (p. 106) Haugeland, Artificial Intelligence. 199. (p. 106) Birnbacher, ‘Artificial Consciousness’. 200. (p. 106) Levy, Artificial Life. 201. (p. 106) Swade, Difference Engine. 202. (p. 106) Woolley, Bride of Science, p. 267. 203. (p. 106) Turing, ‘Computing Machinery’, p. 63. 204. (p. 106) Lovelace, notes on memoir by Menabrea, p. 284. 205. (p. 106) Baron, Computer Languages, pp. 124–127. 206. (p. 106) Polivka and Pakin, APL, pp. 421–425. 207. (p. 107) Polya, How to Solve It, pp. 162–171. 208. (p. 108) Davis and Hersh, Descartes’ Dream, pp. 3–4. 209. (p. 108) Sutcliffe, introduction to translation of Descartes, Discourse on Method, p.

12. 210. (p. 108) Olscamp, introduction to translation of Descartes, Discourse on Method, p.

ix. 211. (p. 108) Russell, Western Philosophy, p. 542. 212. (p. 109) Descartes, Discourse on Method, p. 53. 213. (p. 109) Ibid., pp. 53–54. 214. (p. 109) Ibid., pp. 12 and 45. 215. (p. 109) Descartes, Meditations, p. 156.


216. Ibid., pp. 162–163. 217. Ibid., p. 105. 218. Ibid., p. 98. 219. (p. 109) Magee, Great Philosophers, p. 86. 220. Wheeler, Miracle of Life, pp. 354 and 341. 221. (p. 110) Locke, Human Understanding, p. 60. 222. Gregory, Oxford Companion to the Mind, concept, pp. 157–158. 223. Jung, ‘Role of the Unconscious’, paragraph 5, pp. 6–7. 224. Ibid., paragraphs 8–10, pp. 8–9. 225. Ibid., paragraphs 11–13, pp. 9–10. 226. Jung, ‘Symbols and the Interpretation of Dreams’, paragraphs 416–417, p. 185. 227. Jung, ‘Approaching the Unconscious’, p. 3. 228. Aristotle, Metaphysics, I–IX, 987a33, p. 43 and 1010a10, p. 189. 229. Nhat Hanh, Old Path White Clouds, p. 465. 230. Plato, Cratlyus, 384d, pp. 9 and 11. 231. Sedley, Plato’s Cratylus, pp. 21–23. 232. Ramesh Krishnamurthy, introduction to Supplement 2: ‘Common Names of the In-

dian Subcontinent’ in Hanks and Hodges, Dictionary of First Names, p. 287. 233. Carroll, Through the Looking Glass, p. 197. 234. Sedley, Plato’s Cratylus, p. 4. 235. Plato, Cratlyus, 438c, p. 91. 236. Aristotle, Poetics, 1456b19–1458a17, pp. 99–109. 237. Aristotle, On Interpretation, 16a1–16b8, pp. 115–121. 238. Hawkes, Structuralism and Semiotics, p. 15. 239. Vico, New Science, p. xi. 240. Piaget, Structuralism, pp. 3–14. 241. Scholes, Structuralism in Literature, p. 93. 242. de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics, p. 16, quoted in Hawkes, Structuralism and

Semiotics, p. 123. 243. (p. 118) Ibid., pp. 66–67. 244. Peirce, Collected Papers, 2.227, MS 798, quoted in Hawkes, Structuralism and Semi-

otics, pp. 123–124. 245. Brent, Peirce, p. 206. This photo is a photogravure from Sun and Shade, August 1892,

vol. 4, no. 12. 246. Peirce, Essential Peirce, vol. 1, pp. 246–247. MS 909, first published in Peirce, Col-

lected Papers, 1.1, p. vii. Also published in Peirce, Writings, vol. 6, 1886–1890, pp. 166–169. 247. Brent, Peirce, pp. 5–6.


248. Magee, Great Philosophers, p. 80. 249. Wilber, Theory of Everything, p. xii. 250. Whitehead, Process and Reality, p. 39. 251. Peirce, Peirce on Signs, p. 180, from MS 901, ‘One, Two, Three: Fundamental Cat-

egories of Thought and Nature’. Partly published in Collected Papers, 1.369–372 and in full inWritings, vol. 5. 1884–1886, pp. 242–247.

252. Ibid., note by Houser and Kloesel to ‘One, Two, Three: Kantian Categories’, MS897. First published in Writings, vol. 5. 1884–1886, pp. 292–294. Also, a fuller extract in Brent,Peirce, p. 136.

253. Peirce, Peirce on Signs, p. 183, from MS 901, referenced in Note 251. 254. Brent, Peirce, pp. xv and xii. 255. Ibid., pp. 209–211. The letter is also published in Peirce, Writings, Vol. 8, 1890–1892,

pp. lxxvi–lxxvii. 256. James, Religious Experience, p. 366. 257. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Vol. 1, p. 313. Also published in Collected Papers, 6.102–163

and Writings, Vol. 8, pp. 135–157. 258. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Vol. 2, pp. 1–2. 259. Ibid., p. 3. 260. Bucke, Cosmic Consciousness. 261. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Vol. 2, p. 3. 262. Brent, Peirce, p. 213. 263. Peirce, Writings, vol. 1, 1857–1866, p. 428. 264. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Vol. 1, p. 186–189. 265. Templeton, Spiritual Information, 51. 266. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Vol. 1, pp. 308–309 and 312. 267. Pople, ‘Mechanization of Abductive Logic’, p. 147. 268. Jackson, Expert Systems, p. 115. 269. (p. 125) Chandler, Semiotics, p. 30. 270. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Volume 2, p. 13. 271. Ibid., p. 272. 272. Ogden and Richards, Meaning of Meaning, p. 279. 273. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria,_Lady_Welby. 274. de Saussure, Course in General Linguistics, pp. 66–67. 275. Peirce, Collected Papers, 2.228, MS 798, quoted in Chandler, Semiotics, p. 29. 276. (p. 126) Ogden and Richards, Meaning of Meaning, p. 11. 277. Sowa, Conceptual Structures, p. 11. 278. Bateson, Steps to an Ecology of Mind, pp. 454–455.


279. (p. 127) Kent, Five Normal Forms. 280. (p. 127) Hadamard, Psychology of Invention. 281. (p. 128) Hadamard, Psychology of Invention, pp. 142–143. 282. (p. 128) Bohm, Wholeness, pp. 3–4. 283. (p. 128) Rocke, Image and Reality, p. 295. 284. (p. 128) Kekulé, 1890 speech. 285. (p. 128) Kekulé von Stradonitz, (Friedrich) August, Encyclopædia Britannica. 286. (p. 128) Kopp, Hermann Franz Moritz, Encyclopædia Britannica. 287. (p. 129) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzene. 288. (p. 129) Kekulé von Stradonitz, (Friedrich) August, Encyclopædia Britannica. 289. (p. 129) The picture of the uroborus is by Theodoros Pelecanos from 1478 in an al-

chemical tract titled Synosius (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros). 290. (p. 129) Rocke, Ibid., chapters 2 and 3, ‘The Architect of Molecules’ and ‘Building

an Unseen Structure’. 291. (p. 130) Polo-Blanco, ‘Alicia Boole Stott’. 292. (p. 130) Coxeter, Regular Polytopes, p. 119. 293. (p. 131) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterography_and_homography. 294. (p. 131) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homonym. 295. (p. 131) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterography_and_homography. 296. (p. 132) Williams, English Language, p. 91. 297. (p. 134) Wahl, Exploring Fractals on the Macintosh. 298. Ibid., p. 47. 299. Mandelbrot, Fractal Geometry of Nature, p. 4. 300. Ibid., p. 44. 301. (p. 136) Coxeter, Regular Polytopes, p. 73. In Book II of The Harmony of the World,

called ‘On the Congruence of Harmonic Figures’, Kepler made some major advances in puremathematics in just 31 pages, which were incidental to his main purpose. “For [as he ex-plained], since we have taken it upon ourselves to explain the origin of Harmony and its mostpowerful effects in the World as a whole, how could we omit to mention congruence of fig-ures which are the well-springs of Harmonic proportions.” (p. 97) He thereby systematicallystudied all the possible ways in which plane figures could form congruences at a point, eitherin the plane or in space, the principal ideas of which he had worked out in the summermonths of 1599, twenty years earlier.

302. (p. 136) Cundy and Rollett, Mathematical Models, pp. 59–63. 303. (p. 136) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallpaper_group. 304. (p. 136) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_uniform_honeycomb. 305. (p. 137) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystallographic_group.


306. (p. 137) Weyl, Symmetry, pp. 47–51. 307. (p. 137) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_polyhedron. 308. (p. 137) Kepler, Harmony of the World, p. 106. 309. (p. 137) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_tiling. 310. (p. 137) Branko Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard made this distinction between non-

periodic and aperiodic tiles in Tilings and Patterns, (Gardner, Penrose Tiles, p. 19). 311. (p. 137) Penrose, ‘Pentaplexity’, p. 33. 312. (p. 138) Ibid., pp. 32–33. 313. (p. 138) Gardner, ‘Extraordinary nonperiodic tiling’. 314. (p. 138) Penrose, ‘Pentaplexity’, p. 37. 315. (p. 138) Rouse Ball, Mathematical Recreations, pp. 147–149. 316. (p. 139) Easwaran, Bhagavad Gita, p. 151. 317. (p. 139) Ibid., p. 156. 318. (p. 140) Brooks, Mythical Man-Month, p. 42. 319. (p. 140) Storr, Solitude, p. ix. 320. (p. 141) Kahn, Heraclitus, p. 53, pp. 168–169. 321. (p. 141) Bohm, Implicate Order, p. 178. 322. (p. 142) Chris Clarke, a professor of mathematical physics in England, suggested in

an email on 17th May 2005 that IRL’s “radical egalitarianism in treating all beings in the sameway is very original”.

323. (p. 142) Einstein, Relativity, p. 45. 324. (p. 142) Einstein, Relativity, p. 18. 325. (p. 144) Teilhard, Human Phenomenon, pp. 216–218. 326. Thakar, Spirituality and Social Action, p. 13. 327. (p. 145) Way, ed., Cloud of Unknowing. p. 17. 328. Shakespeare, Complete Works, ‘Measure for Measure’, Act Two, Scene II, 117–120. 329. Onions, Shakespeare Glossary, glassy ‘frail as glass’, p. 94, and essence ‘nature’, p. 72. 330. http://www.enotes.com/shakespeare-quotes/brief-authority. 331. Peirce Edition Project, annotation to ‘Man’s Glassy Essence’, Peirce, Writings, Vol.

8, pp. 400–401. 332. Ibid., p. 400. 333. Ketner, His Glassy Essence, pp. 10–11. 334. Peirce, Writings, Vol. 1, pp. 491 and 495. 335. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Vol, 1, p. 55. 336. Ibid., pp, 334–351. 337. Ketner, His Glassy Essence, pp. 61–62. 338. James, Pragmatism, Lecture II: ‘What Pragmatism Means’.


339. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Vol, 1, p. 132. 340. Krishnamurti, Education and the Significance of Life, p. 42. 341. Ibid., pp. 14, 24, and 18. 342. Grimal, Dictionary of Classical Mythology, p. 241. 343. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus. 344. Popper, Poverty of Historicism, p. 115. 345. Popper, Objective Knowledge, p. 191. 346. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Volume 2, p. 11–12. 347. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability. 348. university, Encyclopaedia Britannica. 349. Bacon, Advancement of Learning, p. 175. 350. Locke, Human Understanding, pp. 634–635. 351. Peirce, Writings, 1890–1892, pp. 275–276 (MS 1347). This classification derives from

one that Peirce published in his definition of science for the Century Dictionary, which ap-peared in early 1891.

352. Peirce, Collected Papers: Exact Logic, CP 3.428. Originally published in ‘The Regen-erated Logic’, The Monist, Vol. 7, pp, 19–40, October 1896 (P 620).

353. Peirce, Philosophical Writings, p. 66. Originally published in Collected Papers: Prin-ciples of Philosophy, CP 1.239, from Chapter 2 of an incomplete book Minute Logic (MS 427).

354. Peirce, Philosophical Writings, p. 60. Originally published in A Syllabus for CertainTopics of Logic, Alfred Mudge, 1903 (P 1035), and in Collected Papers: Principles of Philosophy,CP 1.181–183,

355. Peirce, Collected Papers: Principles of Philosophy, CP 1.241–242, plus CP 1.241n and1.242n, published without etymological notes in Peirce, Philosophical Writings, p. 66.

356. Russell, ‘Reflections on my Eightieth Birthday’, p. 53. 357. Russell, ‘Experiences of a Pacifist in the First World War’, p. 33. 358. Russell, ‘Why I Took to Philosophy’, pp. 18–22. 359. Russell, Western Philosophy, p. 13. 360. Snow, Two Cultures. 361. pansophy, OED. 362. http://www.abct.org/Home/?m=mAbout&fa=AboutABCT. 363. http://www.abct.org/SHBooks/?shInfo=Public. 364. Cortright, Psychotherapy and Spirit, pp. 13–14. 365. (p. 157) Greene, Elegant Universe, p. ix. 366. (p. 158) Barrow and Tipler, Anthropic Cosmological Principle, p. 254. 367. (p. 158) Yogananda, Autobiography, p. 3.


368. (p. 158) George Bernard Shaw, ‘Maxims for Revolutionists’, available at http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/26107.

369. (p. 158) Oxford English Dictionary. 370. (p. 159) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9000. 371. (p. 159) Paul Hague, ‘The Nature of Data’, June 1980, p. 1, unpublished. 372. (p. 159) Oxford English Dictionary. 373. (p. 159) Ibid. 374. (p. 160) James, Religious Experience, p. 366. 375. (p. 160) Blumenthal, Management Information Systems, p. 30. 376. (p. 160) Lindop, Data Protection, p. 154. 377. (p. 160) These definitions were taken from the Web at address, http://

www.ncits.org/tc_home/k5htm/Ansdit.htm. I originally saw them, or something similar, inIBM, Dictionary of Computing.

378. (p. 160) Heathcote, ‘A’ Level ICT, p. 36–37. 379. (p. 161) Dicke and Wittke, Quantum Mechanics. 380. (p. 161) Cytomic, Man Who Tasted Shapes, pp. 4–5. 381. (p. 161) Genesis, 1:26–27. 382. Spira, Presence: Art of Peace and Happiness and Intimacy of Experience. 383. (p. 162) Rumi, Rumi • Fragments • Ecstasies. 384. (p. 162) Tagore, tr. Songs of Kabir. 385. (p. 163) Hardy, Mathematician’s Apology, p. 150. 386. (p. 163) Ibid., 88–91. 387. (p. 163) Ibid., 84. 388. (p. 163) Ibid., 85. 389. (p. 163) Ibid., 115. 390. (p. 163) Whitehead, Science and the Modern World, p. 25. 391. (p. 163) Hardy, Apology, 103. 392. (p. 163) Ibid., 104. 393. (p. 163) Whitehead, Science, 33. 394. (p. 163) Ibid., 33. 395. (p. 163) Ibid., 39. 396. (p. 163) Hardy, Apology, 109. 397. (p. 163) Ibid., 109. 398. (p. 164) Ibid., 112. 399. (p. 164) Alexander, Timeless Way of Building. 400. (p. 164) Shalloway and Trott, Design Patterns Explained. 401. (p. 165) Snow, Two Cultures.

388 NOTES: BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS, NO. 402.

402. (p. 165) Russell, History of Western Philosophy, p. 13. 403. (p. 165) William Blake, ‘London’. The full second stanza is: “In every cry of every

man,/In every Infant’s cry of fear,/In every voice, in every ban,/The mind-forged manacles Ihear.”

404. (p. 166) http://evolutionaryleaders.net/. 405. (p. 166) Booch, Rumbaugh, and Jacobson, Unified Modeling Language User Guide. 406. (p. 166) Aristotle, Metaphysics, p. 147. 407. (p. 167) Flew, Dictionary of Philosophy. 408. (p. 167) Happold, Mysticism, p. 72. 409. (p. 168) Aristotle, Categories, pp. 17–19. 410. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, p. 113. 411. Peirce, Essential Peirce, pp. 1–6. 412. Brent, Charles Sanders Peirce, p. 69. 413. Peirce, Essential Peirce, Vol. 1, p. 296. 414. Fisch, Peirce, Semeiotic, and Pragmatism, ‘Hegel and Peirce’, pp. 261–282. 415. Royce, Problem of Christianity, ‘The Will to Interpret’, p. 305. 416. Wilber, Integral Spirituality, pp. 20–21 and 286–287. 417. (p. 172) Koestler, Janus, p. 291.

CHAPTER 2. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS

Motto: (p. 177) Source unknown. 1. (p. 178) All these definitions of the first principle of the universe are taken from

Shambhala’s The Encyclopedia of Eastern Philosophy and Religion (Fischer-Schreiber et al,1989).

2. (p. 178) The Oxford Classical Greek Dictionary gives many other possible translationsfor logos: saying, speaking, speech, mode of speaking; eloquence, discourse; conversation, talk; word,expression, assertion; principle, maxim; proverb; oracle; promise, order, command; proposal; con-dition, agreement; stipulation, decision; pretext; fable, news, story, report, legend; prose-writing,history, book, essay; oration; affair, incident; thought, reason, reckoning, computation, reflection,deliberation, account, consideration, opinion; cause, end; argument, demonstration; meaning, val-ue; proportion.

3. (p. 179) John, 1:1. 4. (p. 179) Tarnas, Western Mind, p. 101. 5. (p. 179) Ibid., p. 45. 6. (p. 179) Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 7. (p. 179) Ibid. 8. (p. 179) Tarnas, Western Mind, p. 101.

NOTES: BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS, NO. 32. 389

9. (p. 179) John, 1:14. 10. (p. 181) Bohm, Wholeness, p. 115–116. 11. (p. 181) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Maths. 12. (p. 181) Turchin, Phenomenon of Science, p. 283. 13. (p. 181) Aristotle, Prior Analytics, p. 201. 14. (p. 182) The Sami people have historically been called Lapps or Laplanders. Like so

many other minorities they don’t like being called by these traditional names. This is not sur-prising because the word Lapp seems to be related to the Middle High German word lappe,meaning ‘simpleton’. Nevertheless, the northernmost province (landskap) in Sweden is stillcalled Lappland today.

15. (p. 189) Professional linguists generally use the terms restricting and nonrestrictingwhere Fowler uses defining and nondefining.

16. (p. 190) Euclid, Elements, Vol 1, pp 316–322, Book I, proposition 32. 17. (p. 190) Aristotle, Prior Analytics. 18. (p. 191) Kent, Data and Reality, p. 10, quoted from Whorf, Language, Thought, and

Reality. 19. (p. 191) Encyclopædia Britannica, ‘History of the Sumerian language’. 20. (p. 191) Encyclopædia Britannica, ‘Cuneiform’. 21. (p. 191) Koestler recounts in splendid detail the stories of Tycho de Brahe and Jo-

hannes Kepler in Part Four of The Sleepwalkers, called ‘The Watershed’, on pages 225 to 427. 22. (p. 191) Information about the TNA is available at http://www.national-

archives.gov.uk/. 23. (p. 191) There is a brief history of the UK Public Record Office beginning at http://

www.pro.gov.uk/about/history/history1.htm. 24. (p. 192) Actually, the indexes of births, marriages, and deaths are not managed by the

Public Record Office. Unlike most government records they have been retained by their orig-inal department, the General Register Office (GRO). In recent years, many of these indexeshave become available on the Internet in various forms.

25. (p. 192) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Records_Centre. 26. (p. 192) Hey, Oxford Guide to Family History, p. 175. 27. (p. 192) Koestler, Sleepwalkers, p. 48. 28. (p. 193) Fowler’s Modern English Usage, p.253. 29. (p. 196) Codd, ‘Relational Model’. 30. (p. 196) Chen, ‘Entity-Relationship Model’. 31. (p. 196) See, for example, Booch, Object-Oriented Design, and Rumbaugh, Object-ori-

ented Modeling. 32. (p. 197) See Pete’s web site http://www.peterussell.com/.

390 NOTES: BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS, NO. 33.

33. (p. 197) Chomsky, Theory of Syntax, p. 149. I have done very little work in attemptingto represent the findings of the linguists during the last few decades of the last century in IRL.I leave this as an exercise for those who are interested in this subject.

34. (p. 198) Bohm, Implicate Order, p. 118–119. 35. (p. 198) In A Brief History of Time, Stephen Hawking says this (p. 162): “String the-

ories … seem to be consistent only if space-time has either ten or twenty-six dimensions, in-stead of the usual four”. However, in The Elegant Universe, Brian Greene has opted for justten dimensions: “For string theory to make sense, the universe should have nine space dimen-sions and one time dimension, for a total of ten dimensions.” (p. 203).

36. (p. 199) I discovered the SPINES thesaurus while I was working on a new manage-ment accounting system for the Kuwait Institute of Scientific Research (KISR) in 1982.

37. (p. 199) To manage such a complexity of terms, it is much easier to use a general-purpose thesaurus administrator. In the 1990s, one such program was the IBM Thesaurus Ad-ministrator/2, which did not restrict hierarchical relationships just to broader and narrowerterms, but was able to accommodate any type of hierarchical relationship. This program nolonger exists, but maybe a similar one could provide some ideas on how to develop a comput-er tool to help those wishing to learn IRL.

38. (p. 200) Hofstadter, Gödel, p. 134. 39. (p. 200) Buzan, Use Your Head, p. 9. 40. (p. 200) Wilber, Sex, Ecology, Spirituality and Wilber, Brief History of Everything. 41. (p. 201) Koestler coined the word holon in Ghost in the Machine, “from the Greek ho-

los = whole, with the suffix on which, as in proton or neutron, suggests a particle or part.” (p.48.) Actually, Koestler uses the word holarchy very little in this book, because he was con-cerned with creating too many neologisms. It was only in Janus that he began to use the wordmore frequently.

42. (p. 201) In Janus, Koestler said, “every holon is possessed of two opposite tendenciesof potentials: an integrative tendency to function as part of the larger whole, and a self-assertivetendency to preserve its individual autonomy.” (p. 57.) However, this property of holons onlyapplies in aggregation and associative structures, whether they be biological, social, or what-ever, not in generalization ones.

43. (p. 201) Rumbaugh, Object-oriented Modeling, pp. 36–43 44. (p. 201) Miller, Psychology of Communication, Chapter 2, pp. 21–50. 45. (p. 203) The limits of scientific induction that Hume identified in A Treatise of Hu-

man Nature were investigated by Karl Popper in Objective Knowledge (p. 4f), which led Pop-per to develop his falsification theory of scientific knowledge. This was criticized, in turn, byChalmers in What is this Thing Called Science? because observation statements are theory de-pendent and so could themselves be false. Chalmers then went on to resolve this weakness of

NOTES: UNIFYING OPPOSITES, NO. 4. 391

the falsification theory by saying that scientific theories need to be looked at as structures,along the lines of Thomas Kuhn and Imre Lakatos. However, what he neglected to say is thatsuch structured wholes need to be completely free of built-in assumptions, what Lakatoscalled the ‘hard-core’ of a scientific paradigm.

46. (p. 204) Sowa, Conceptual Structures, p. 82. 47. (p. 208) Koestler, Ghost in the Machine. 48. (p. 211) Hofstadter, Gödel, p. 370. 49. (p. 213) Jacobson et al, Object Advantage, p. 12. The IBM Software Technical Centre

in Stockholm, at which I was employed in 1996, was organized along these lines before it wasclosed due to IBM’s downsizing.

50. (p. 213) I am rather out of date with current products in this area. In the early 1990s,the TABULATE function in IBM’s Visualizer decision support system product provided onesuch facility. APL, perhaps the most powerful language for the manipulation of matrices, pro-vides another environment for the direct handling of matrices rather than relations, per se.

51. (p. 216) Westfall, Life of Isaac Newton. 52. (p. 216) Voltaire, Letters on England, p. 68. 53. (p. 216) Sheldrake, New Science of Life. 54. (p. 216) I don’t have the exact issue of Nature in which John Maddox, a physicist,

made this famous remark in 1981. However, in an interview broadcast on BBC television in1994, he emphasized his rejection of the notion of morphogenetic fields by saying: “Sheldrakeis putting forward magic instead of science, and that can be condemned in exactly the lan-guage that the Pope used to condemn Galileo, and for the same reason. It is heresy.” Not sur-prisingly, Rupert calls Maddox his “longest-standing critic” (see http://www.sheldrake.org/controversies/).

55. (p. 216) Schlitz and Amorok, eds. Consciousness and Healing, p. 364. 56. (p. 216) Radin, The Conscious Universe. 57. (p. 217) Koestler, Janus, p. 291. 58. (p. 220) Christian de Quincey, ‘A Theory of Everything? A Critical Appreciation of

Ken Wilber’s Collected Works’, Noetic Sciences Review, March–May 2001, No. 55, p. 15.

CHAPTER 3. UNIFYING OPPOSITES

Motto: (p. 223) Lao Tzu, Tao Teh Ching, translated by John C. H. Wu, verse 2, p. 2. 1. (p. 223) Carroll, Symbolic Logic and The Game of Logic. 2. (p. 224) Carroll, Through the Looking Glass, pp. 132 and 133. 3. (p. 224) Plato, Republic, Part VII, §7 The Simile of the Cave, pp. 316–325. 4. (p. 224) Ibid., pp. 263–267. Translator’s commentary on theory of Forms or Ideas, not

given as a full or direct exposition.

392 NOTES: UNIFYING OPPOSITES, NO. 5.

5. (p. 224) Newman and Nagel, Gödel, pp. 45–56. 6. (p. 224) Ibid., pp. 68–97. 7. (p. 226) Durell, Projective Geometry, pp. 91–92. 8. (p. 226) Ibid., pp. 92–93. 9. (p. 226) Ibid., p. 108. The principle of duality in projective geometry fascinated me as

a student. It was this principle that first gave me the idea of applying it to all knowledge, notjust to lines and points.

10. (p. 227) Coxeter et al, p. 401. 11. (p. 227) Escher and Locher, Escher, p. 119. 12. (p. 227) Schumacher, Guide for the Perplexed, p. 15. 13. (p. 227) The Principle of Duality arose in my consciousness during the third week of

June 1980, just five weeks after I sat down to develop a synthesis of everything. It was the mosteerie of feelings. On the one hand, I knew that I had found a statement about the Universethat was of the utmost profundity. Yet, at the same time, I didn’t then have the consciousnessnecessary to understand the full implications of this statement to its greatest depth. It has tak-en me most of the intervening years to discover its full meaning.

14. (p. 229) Kline, Loss of Certainty, pp. 209–212. 15. (p. 230) Krishnamurti, Awakening of Intelligence, pp. 329–331. 16. (p. 232) Kahn, Heraclitus, p. 85. 17. (p. 232) Fischer, Marx, pp. 15–30. 18. (p. 234) I first saw this way of depicting the relationships between the main political

attitudes in the world in a current affairs lesson as school when I was seventeen. The teacherwho showed us this diagram was, of course, a member of what was then called the Liberalparty, from the Latin liberare, ‘to free’, from liber, ‘free’. It is interesting to note that conserv-ative politicians in the USA, who talk so much about freedom, regard liberalism as a deroga-tory term.

19. (p. 235) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagonal_proof. 20. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_hypothesis. 21. Gray, Hilbert Challenge, p. 7. 22. Gödel, Consistency of the Axiom of Choice. 23. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. 24. (p. 236) See chapter X ‘Logicism versus intuitionism’ and XI ‘Formalist and set-the-

oretic foundations’ in Kline’s Mathematics for an in-depth review of these issues. 25. (p. 236) Of particular note here is the work of Gottlob Frege, who sought to build

the whole of mathematics on logic. In 1879, he published a short book called Begriffsschrift,usually translated as concept writing or concept notation. The full title of the book identifies itas “a formula language, modelled on that of arithmetic, of pure thought.” This book was to

NOTES: TRANSCENDING THE CATEGORIES, NO. 10. 393

pave the way for first-order logic, also called first-order predicate logic. However, in 1902,Bertrand Russell wrote a famous letter to Frege pointing out that there are paradoxes in settheory and that this whole enterprise was doomed to failure. Russell was truly amazed atFrege’s humble reply:

As I think about acts of integrity and grace, I realise that there is not anything in my knowledge tocompare to Frege’s dedication to truth. His entire life’s work was on the verge of completion, much ofhis work had been ignored to the benefit of men infinitely less capable, his second volume was about tobe published, and upon finding that his fundamental assumption was in error, he responded withintellectual pleasure clearly submerging any feelings of personal disappointment. It was almostsuperhuman …See van Heijenoort’s From Frege to Gödel for the correspondence between Frege and Rus-

sell, as well as a reproduction of Begriffsschrift. 26. (p. 236) Stewart, Modern Mathematics, p. 116. 27. (p. 239) Wilber, Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution, p. 122. 28. (p. 239) Carter Phipps, ‘A Philosopher of Everything’, What is Enlightenment? (No.

33, June-August 2006), p. 61. 29. (p. 240) The Association for Global New Thought. Synthesis Dialogues: The Dalai

Lama of Tibet and the World Leaders of Spirit, Rome, June 2004, DVD. 30. (p. 240) Quinton, Francis Bacon. 31. (p. 242) Capra, The Turning Point.

CHAPTER 4. TRANSCENDING THE CATEGORIES

Motto: (p. 243) The central theme of Consciousness Speaks. 1. (p. 245) K. Connie Kang. ‘Across the globe, Christians are united by Lord’s Prayer.’

Los Angeles Times, in Houston Chronicle, p. A13, April 8, 2007, reported in Wikipedia’s article,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord's_prayer.

2. (p. 245) Bohm, Wholeness, p. 19. 3. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, pp. 9, 11, 12, 46–48. 4. Stern, Hegel, p. 195. 5. (p. 248) Capra, Web of Life. 6. See, for instance, Lazlo, Akasha Paradigm in Science. 7. (p. 248) Forman, Meister Eckhart, pp. 218–219. 8. (p. 248) Grof with Bennett, Holotropic Mind, p. 40. 9. (p. 250) http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/

einstein_symphony_prog_summary.shtml. The documentary was written by Jeremy HyltonDavies and produced and directed by Nick Green.

10. (p. 251) Pagels, Beyond Belief, pp. 228 and 240.

394 NOTES: TRANSCENDING THE CATEGORIES, NO. 11.

11. (p. 251) Lao Tzu, Tao Teh Ching, section 62, p. 91. 12. (p. 251) Ibid., section 70, p. 103. 13. (p. 251) Osho, Hidden Harmony, pp. 1 and 190. 14. (p. 251) John of the Cross, Dark Night of the Soul. 15. (p. 252) James, Varieties of Religious Experience, p. 366. 16. (p. 252) Ibid., pp. 367–368. 17. (p. 252) Happold, Mysticism, pp. 46–58. 18. (p. 252) Tart, Altered States of Consciousness. 19. (p. 252) Forman, ‘Mysticism, Language, & the Via Negativa’, p. 38, referring to Hay,

Religious Experience Today. 20. (p. 253) http://www.issc-taste.org/. 21. (p. 253) Huxley, Perennial Philosopy, p. vii. 22. http://www.vedanta-philosophy.com/page2.html. 23. (p. 254) Easwaran, Upanishads, pp. 95–96. 24. Ayer, Central Questions of Philosophy, p. 4. 25. Monier-Williams, A Sanskrit-English Dictionary, pp. 811 and 804. 26. (p. 256) David Chalmers, ‘Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness’, Journal of

Consciousness Studies, 2, No. 3, 1995, pp. 200–19. 27. Berg, Power of Kabbalah, pp. 14 and 19. 28. (p. 257) John 8:12. 29. (p. 257) Allen, et al. Energy, Matter & Form. 30. (p. 258) Happold, Mysticism, p. 72. 31. (p. 258) Philippians 4:14. 32. (p. 258) Storr, Human Aggression, p. 9. 33. (p. 258) Blau, Krishnamurti, p. 85. 34. Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, pp. 143–147. 35. (p. 260) Bohm, Wholeness, p. 48. 36. Rees, Our Final Century, pp. 145 and 148. 37. Kabir, Songs of Kabir, p. 91. 38. Rees, Our Final Century, pp. 148–149. 39. James, ‘Is Life Worth Living’, in Will to Believe, 43–44. 40. National Geographic, The Death of the Universe, National Geographic Channel,

2008. 41. Rees, Our Final Century, pp. 146–147. 42. (p. 261) William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, and Mark Vicente, dirs., What the Bleep Do We

Know!? DVD (Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, 2004). 43. https://www.scimednet.org/infinite-potential-the-legacy-of-david-bohm-2/.

NOTES: TRANSCENDING THE CATEGORIES, NO. 77. 395

44. (p. 262) 1 John 4: 16. 45. (p. 262) http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/

hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est_en.html. 46. (p. 262) Rumi, Fragments • Ecstasies, p. 31.Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 209. 47. Jung, Psychological Types, paragraphs 757–762, pp. 448-449. 48. Jung, Analytical Psychology pp. 137–138 and 186, also on The Symbolic Life, paragraphs

270, 271, and 377. 49. Nhat Hanh, Old Path White Clouds, p. 463. 50. Fischer-Schreiber, Encylopedia, articles on Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna, pp. 215–216

and 129–130. 51. Ibid., article on Bodhisattva, pp. 39–40. 52. Cook, Hua-yen Buddhism, p. 1. 53. Cleary, Flower Ornament Scripture. 54. Suzuki, Studies in the Lankavarara Sutra, p. 95. 55. Cook, Hua-yen Buddhism, pp. 25–26. 56. Chang, Buddhist Teaching of Totality, pp. 231–241. 57. Ibid., p. 141. 58. Ibid., pp. 224–230. 59. Cayley, Essay on the Golden Lion. 60. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra's_net. 61. Cook, Hua-yen Buddhism, p. 2. 62. Ibid., pp. 8–9. 63. Sheldrake, New Science of Life. 64. Levy, Madness of George W. Bush. 65. Robertson, Indra’s Net. 66. Mumford, et al, Indra’s Pearls. 67. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/07/barack-obama-speech-full-text. 68. (p. 272) Bohm, Causality, p. 1. 69. (p. 272) Aristotle, Metaphysics, passim. 70. (p. 272) Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiæ, p. 12–14. 71. (p. 273) Teilhard, Human Phenomenon, p. 173. 72. Jung, ‘The Role of the Unconscious’, ¶ 5, pp. 6–7. 73. Ibid, ¶¶ 8–10, pp. 8–9. 74. Ibid, ¶¶ 11–13, pp. 9–10. 75. Jung, Aion, ‘The Shadow’, ¶ 13, p. 8. 76. http://www.infed.org/archives/e-texts/bohm_dialogue.htm. 77. Bohm, On Dialogue, p. vii.

396 NOTES: GLOSSARY, NO. 78.

78. David Wasdell, ‘Foundations of Psycho-Social Analysis, Part I: Diagnosis’, publishedin Energy and Character, Vol. 14, No. 2, http://www.meridian.org.uk/_PDFs/Foundation-sI.pdf.

79. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverture. 80. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism#History. 81. Jung, Aion, ‘The Syzygy: Anima and Animus’, ¶ 29, p. 14. 82. Jung, ‘A Study in the Process of Individuation’, ¶ 525, pp. 290–291. 83. Ibid. 84. mandala, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008. 85. Khanna, Yantra, p. 8. 86. mandala, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008. 87. Casement, ‘Psychodynamic Therapy’ p. 80. 88. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/

Chenrezig_Sand_Mandala.jpg.

GLOSSARY

1. Michael W. Stowell, 5th February 2001, http://www.swans.com/library/art7/mws002.html.

2. http://absentofi.org/2005/10/biocracy/. 3. The United States is described as a logocracy in Washington Irving’s 1807 work, Sal-

magundi. A visiting foreigner, ‘Mustapha Rub-a-dub Keli Khan’, ironically describes it assuch, by which he means that via the tricky use of words, one can have power over others(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logocracy).

4. In an article called ‘Ming the Mechanic, Flemming Funch defines holocracy as “thetotal system of whole things in nature, the original whole which is made up of the smallerwhole parts”, somewhat different from the Divine meaning of Wholeness. (http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-000066.htm)

5. Hobbes, Leviathan, Part II, Chapter 23, 124, p. 160. 6. http://beautyideals.blogspot.se/2008/09/kalokagathia.html. 7. http://www.wordnik.com/words/kalokagathia. 8. Monier-Williams, A Sanskrit-English Dictionary, pp. 811 and 804. 9. Concise Oxford English Dictionary. 10. Wikipedia and others. 11. Bohm, Wholeness, pp. 118–122. 12. Fromm, To Have or To Be? p. 75. 13. Fortson, Indo-European Language and Culture, p. 7. 14. Monier-Williams, A Sanskrit-English Dictionary, p. 845.

NOTES: BIBLIOGRAPHY, NO. 1. 397

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Cartoon: From the New Yorker, a cutout given to me by a friend in 1992. 1. Weizenbaum, ‘Computer Revolution’, p. 445.

Documents

Notes for Volume One - paragonian.orgparagonian.org/pdf_files/wholeness/notes_irl.pdf365 Notes for Volume One PROLOGUE: SETTING OUT Motto: Source not known. 1. T. S. Eliot, ‘Little