Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
County Hall, New Road, Oxford, OX1 1ND
www.oxfordshire.gov.uk Fax: 01865 783195 Media Enquiries 01865 815266
To: Members and Invitees of the Admission Forum
Notice of a Meeting of the Admission Forum
Wednesday, 16 June 2010 at 3.30 pm
Meeting Room 1, County Hall
Membership
Chairman – Councillor Lawrie Stratford
CORE MEMBERS
Community School Representative: Jolie Kirby
Voluntary Controlled School Representative:
To be confirmed
Voluntary Aided School Representative:
To be confirmed
Foundation School Representative: Nick Hindmarsh
Academy Representative: Ruth Robinson
Parent Representative: Dr Uday Kishore
Community Representative: Aggie Kalungu-Banda (Oxfordshire Racial Equality Council)
Anglican Diocese of Oxford Representative:
Christine Jones
Catholic Archdiocese of Birmingham Representative:
Kate Edwards
NON CORE MEMBERS
RAF Representative: Meg Wickett (Community Development Officer – RAF Benson)
Tony Cloke Assistant Head of Legal & Democratic Services June 2010 Contact Officer: Kath Coldwell, tel: 01865 815902 email:
Public Document Pack
Community Representative: Olivia Denson (Children’s Education Advisory Service)
Secondary Community School Representative:
To be confirmed
Secondary Community School Representative (with experience and knowledge of special needs)
Peter Simmonds
Primary Community School Representative:
To be confirmed
Primary Church Aided School Representative:
To be confirmed
Councillor Representatives: Councillor Lawrie Stratford Councillor Michael Waine
Parent Admission Advisor Representative:
Rachel Caseby
Governor Representative: Frank Newhofer
Vacancy:
The Agenda is attached
Date of next meeting: 20 October 2010
AGENDA
1. Election to Chairman for a Year
The Forum is reminded that at its last meeting Councillor Lawrie Stratford agreed to take on the role of Chairman until another Forum member was willing to take on this role. The Forum is therefore asked again whether it wishes to elect a Chairman, to remain in post for a year from the date of their election, as agreed in the Forum’s Constitution. Members are reminded that the Chairman does not have to be a core member. The Forum is therefore asked again whether it wishes to elect a Chairman, to remain in post for a year from the date of their election, as agreed in the Forum’s Constitution.
2. Apologies for Absence
3. Declarations of Interest - see guidance note on back page
4. Admission Forum Minutes (Pages 1 - 6)
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 23 February 2010 (AF4).
5. Any other Business
6. Review of Admission Forum Constitution (Pages 7 - 16)
Contact Officer: Kath Coldwell, 01865 815902 The Forum previously agreed to review its Constitution on an annual basis. It is now a year since the initial version was agreed. The attached version (AF6) contains a number of amendments in light of membership and other changes. The Forum is invited to agree the revised Constitution and to consider whether it wishes to make any further changes.
7. Update report on Admission Outcomes (Pages 17 - 28)
Contact Officer: Neil Darlington, 01865 815844
- 2 -
To receive an update report which includes information on admission outcomes, additional places, schools admitting above their published admission number, preference statistics, future demand 2010 and plans for expansion from 2011 onwards (AF7). A more detailed breakdown by area will be tabled at the meeting. The Forum is invited to receive the update.
8. Local Authority Report
Contact Officer: Neil Darlington, 01865 815844 The Local Authority Report to the Adjudicator will follow (AF8). The Forum is invited to offer any comment on the report.
9. Examples of Admission Forum reports produced by other local authorities (Pages 29 - 116)
Contact Officer: Neil Darlington, 01865 815844 At the Forum’s last meeting members agreed not to produce their own report this year and requested examples of Admission Forum reports produced by other local authorities. Reports from Devon and Wiltshire (2) are attached (AF9(a), AF9(b) and AF9(c)). The Forum is invited to consider the attached reports.
10. Progress Report on the application of the In Year Fair Access Protocol (Pages 117 - 118)
Contact Officer: Barry Armstrong, 01865 815956 A progress report on the application of the In Year Fair Access Protocol is attached (AF10). The Forum is invited to receive the report.
Declarations of Interest This note briefly summarises the position on interests which you must declare at the meeting. Please refer to the Members’ Code of Conduct in Section DD of the Constitution for a fuller description. The duty to declare … You must always declare any “personal interest” in a matter under consideration, ie where the matter affects (either positively or negatively): (i) any of the financial and other interests which you are required to notify for inclusion in the
statutory Register of Members’ Interests; or (ii) your own well-being or financial position or that of any member of your family or any
person with whom you have a close association more than it would affect other people in the County.
Whose interests are included … “Member of your family” in (ii) above includes spouses and partners and other relatives’ spouses and partners, and extends to the employment and investment interests of relatives and friends and their involvement in other bodies of various descriptions. For a full list of what “relative” covers, please see the Code of Conduct. When and what to declare … The best time to make any declaration is under the agenda item “Declarations of Interest”. Under the Code you must declare not later than at the start of the item concerned or (if different) as soon as the interest “becomes apparent”. In making a declaration you must state the nature of the interest. Taking part if you have an interest … Having made a declaration you may still take part in the debate and vote on the matter unless your personal interest is also a “prejudicial” interest. “Prejudicial” interests … A prejudicial interest is one which a member of the public knowing the relevant facts would think so significant as to be likely to affect your judgment of the public interest. What to do if your interest is prejudicial … If you have a prejudicial interest in any matter under consideration, you may remain in the room but only for the purpose of making representations, answering questions or giving evidence relating to the matter under consideration, provided that the public are also allowed to attend the meeting for the same purpose, whether under a statutory right or otherwise. Exceptions … There are a few circumstances where you may regard yourself as not having a prejudicial interest or may participate even though you may have one. These, together with other rules about participation in the case of a prejudicial interest, are set out in paragraphs 10 – 12 of the Code. Seeking Advice … It is your responsibility to decide whether any of these provisions apply to you in particular circumstances, but you may wish to seek the advice of the Monitoring Officer before the meeting.
If you have any special requirements (such as a large print version of these papers or special access facilities) please contact the officer named on the front page, but please give as much notice as possible before the meeting.
This page is intentionally left blank
AF_160610R01.doc
ADMISSION FORUM
MINUTES of the meeting held on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 commencing at 6.00 pm and finishing at 7.50 pm
Present:
Members: Councillor Lawrie Stratford – in the Chair
Rachel Caseby (Parent Admission Advisor Representative) Olivia Denson (Community Representative - CEAS) Peter Simmonds (Secondary Community School Representative with experience and knowledge of special needs) Nick Hindmarsh (Foundation School Representative) (part of meeting) Aggie Kalungu-Banda (Community Representative) (part of meeting)
Officers:
Whole of meeting K. Coldwell (Corporate Core) & N. Darlington (Children, Young People & Families)
The Committee considered the matters, reports and recommendations contained or referred to in the agenda for the meeting, together with the following documents as listed below:
• September Intake 2010 Proposed Admission Number Increases and Primary Allocations and Secondary Allocations for 2010 in terms of problem areas this year in relation to Agenda Item 9
and decided as set out below. Except insofar as otherwise specified, the reasons for the decisions are contained in the agenda, reports and additional documents, copies of which are attached to the signed Minutes. 16/09 ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN FOR A YEAR
(Agenda No. 1) It was AGREED to nominate Councillor Lawrie Stratford as Chairman until such time by which another Forum Member was willing to take on this role. Ms Coldwell undertook to email Councillor Stratford the details of the weeks in which the agenda planning meetings would normally be held, in order to ensure that these meetings could be scheduled alongside his existing appointments at County Hall.
Agenda Item 4
Page 1
AF4
AF_160610R01.doc
17/09 ELECTION OF DEPUTY CHAIRMAN FOR A YEAR (Agenda No. 2) It was AGREED to leave the post of Deputy Chairman vacant until further notice.
18/09 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE (Agenda No. 3) Apologies for absence were received from Mrs Coombs, Mrs Edwards, Mrs Kirby, Dr Kishore, Mr Newhofer, Councillor Waine and Ms Wickett.
19/09 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST (Agenda No. 4) Mrs Caseby declared a personal interest at this item on the grounds that she is a governor at Aston Rowant Church of England Primary School, her children attend two Oxfordshire schools and her husband is the Deputy Headteacher of St Gregory the Great Catholic School. Mr Hindmarsh declared a personal interest at this item on the grounds that he could have a personal interest as Warriner School is an Admissions Authority. Councillor Lawrie Stratford declared a personal interest at this item by virtue of being a governor at two schools in Bicester. Mrs Aggie Kalungu-Banda declared a personal interest at this item by virtue of being the Chair of Governors at St Joseph Catholic School in Banbury.
20/09 MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING (Agenda No. 5) The Minutes of the meeting held on 24 November 2009 were approved and signed. Matters Arising Minute 45/09 - Admission Policies of ‘Own Admission Authority Schools’ The Forum AGREED to advise Banbury School via Mr Darlington that it must remove the wording in its admissions policy which stated that pupils must have level 5 ability or above in English, as this could be perceived to be selection by ability rather than by an aptitude for drama and could, for example, exclude talented children with dyslexia or for whom English was not their first language.
21/09 ANY OTHER BUSINESS (Agenda No. 6) Future scheduling of meetings of the Admission Forum
Page 2
AF4
AF_160610R01.doc
In response to a request from a Forum Member, Ms Coldwell undertook to canvas existing members as to their scheduling preferences for future meetings. It was felt that evening meetings were inconvenient, at extra cost to the Council and had not had the desired effect in increasing attendance by school representatives. It was suggested that future meetings could be scheduled for 4 or 4.30 pm or at 10 am or 2 pm in order to increase attendance by schools. Forum members noted that there were still six vacancies on the Forum, 5 of which were for school representatives. Any rescheduling would be dependent on room availability at County Hall. At the Forum’s request, Ms Coldwell also undertook to list past attendance statistics to enable a comparison to be made of attendance when meetings had been held at 3.30 pm with attendance at those meetings which had been held at 6 pm. Members were reminded that membership had changed as from October 2009 in line with the new regulations for Admission Forums.
22/09 ADMISSION FORUM REPORT (Agenda No. 7) The Forum AGREED that it did not see the need to produce its own report this year, as the Forum had not needed to address any major issues of concern in the past year. Although there had been various issues, there generally was not any friction between the county’s schools and the local authority. However, Forum members wished to view examples of reports produced by other Admission Forums at its next meeting. Devon, Wiltshire and Northampton were cited as examples.
23/09 CO-ORDINATED ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS AND ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS FOR COMMUNITY AND VOLUNTARY CONTROLLED SCHOOLS FOR 2011/12 - OUTCOME OF CONSULTATION (Agenda No. 8) The Forum noted the outcomes of the consultation on admission arrangements. In response to the perception by many of the County’s Catholic schools that the Local Authority intended to allocate places from the waiting list (which it was not legally permitted to do), and at the Forum’s request, Mr Darlington
Page 3
AF4
AF_160610R01.doc
undertook to change the following wording in the proposed Schedule of Co-ordination for Admission to Primary, Infants’ and Junior Schools for Years F1 to Year 6 and Secondary Schools for Years 7 to 11 in 2011/12 as indicated in bold italics and strikethrough:
(9.3) The LA acting on behalf of all maintained schools and Academies in Oxfordshire, will maintain hold the continued interest lists for entry to F1, Year 3 at junior schools and Year 7 at secondary schools from initial allocation until the last day of the 2011-12 academic year
and to publicise this change in ‘Schools News’. Schools would be informed that the waiting list was the information currently held by the authority and was not necessarily the definitive version.
24/09 ADMISSION OUTCOMES IN RELATION TO PREFERENCES AT PRIMARY AND SECONDARY LEVEL (Agenda No. 9) The Forum noted that:
• officers were still working on the data, although the letters would be despatched on 1 March;
• problem areas this year in terms of primary allocation for 2010 were in Wallingford, Abingdon, Wantage and the City, although all children would be offered a school place. In terms of secondary allocation for 2010 in Banbury, some students had been allocated schools 20 miles from home, as Banbury school had reduced its admission number this year from 290 to 220. However, it was likely that Banbury still had the net capacity in terms of actual admission numbers;
• there was the intention to expand many of the county’s schools due to the rising birth rate.
The Forum AGREED:
• to advise Banbury School via Mr Darlington that it should look again at its admission number, as its current number might result in young people living in Banbury having to travel a considerable distance to school outside of their local community and not being able to participate in extra curricular activities as a result. Concern was also expressed that it might affect their attitude towards school and that it would be hard for their parents to build a relationship with the school;
• to request more information from Mr Darlington regarding capacity in the county’s schools, to enable Forum Members to put forward their ideas and concerns. This information should be provided to its next meeting and should cover:
o net capacity assessments for all of the county’s schools, to enable
the Forum to assess capacity by area;
Page 4
AF4
AF_160610R01.doc
o county wide figures broken into primary schools and clusters that feed into secondary schools and what future planning was in place for those schools;
o forecasts for the next five years, especially for the challenging areas;
o which of the county’s schools have the capacity to expand now and which will have to rely on temporary classrooms;
o where the county has granted planning applications and when the projects are due to come on stream. (The Forum wishes to be assured that the schools’ building programme will be sufficient to address challenging areas);
• to record its thanks to Mr Darlington and his team for their effective administration of the system;
• to note that it would also be receiving an updated report on admission outcomes in relation to how many first, second and third preferences were met at primary and secondary level and any changes in terms of late applications, to its next meeting.
25/09 ADMISSION POLICIES OF 'OWN ADMISSION AUTHORITY'
SCHOOLS (Agenda No. 10) The Forum noted that the County’s schools were generally quite happy with random allocation.
26/09 HOME TO SCHOOL TRANSPORT POLICY (Agenda No. 11) The Forum considered the Consultation Document on the Home to School Transport Policy for 2011/12 onwards and AGREED to put forward the following comment to Mr Darlington: In relation to paragraph 6 ‘Where free or concessionary travel has been agreed it is provided for attendance at the beginning and end of the school day and not for extracurricular activities’, the Forum is conscious of the need for children and young people to have the opportunity to participate in extracurricular activities, especially those children and young people who come from deprived backgrounds and are likely to be disadvantaged. The Forum appreciates that it is not the County Council’s policy to make this concession, but wishes it to be bourne in mind for the future. The Forum advises that schools might be encouraged to look at appropriate solutions where necessary. For example, a school could chose to provide a minibus and a driver, dependent on the number of children staying behind to participate in extra curricular activities or could chose to extend its lunchtime in order to best accommodate all pupils. At the Forum’s request, Mr Darlington undertook to:
Page 5
AF4
AF_160610R01.doc
• ensure that any reference to free school meals in the policy included the words ‘eligibility for’, as it was eligibility, not take up, that counted in terms of the exemption from charging;
• change the wording on page 25 from ‘parents’ to ‘parent’, as the eligibility criteria for exemption from charging could apply if the child or young person was only living with one parent who was in receipt of the maximum level of Working Tax Credit.
The Forum noted that only one response to the consultation had been submitted to date and that it had been favourable.
27/09 IN YEAR FAIR ACCESS PROTOCOL/HARD TO PLACE PANELS/LOCAL BEHAVIOUR PARTNERSHIPS (Agenda No. 12) The Panel noted the report.
in the Chair Date of signing 2010
Page 6
AF_JUN1610R03.doc
ADMISSION FORUM CONSTITUTION
(Amended post membership changes on 17 June 2009 and on an ongoing basis)
Italics = Based on the December 2008 Regulations (came into force on 10 February 2009)
1. MEMBERSHIP
(1) The forum must comprise no more than 20 members, appointed by the authority
in accordance with regulations 8 and 9 of the School Admissions (Local Authority
Reports and Admission Forums) (England) Regulations 2008 and must include:
(a) Schools Representatives – Must be a head teacher or a governor (other than a governor who is appointed to the governing body by the authority and is a member of the authority).
At least one representative of each of the following schools which are in the relevant area of the local education authority [local authority] that established the forum:
(i) community schools;
(ii) voluntary controlled schools;
(iii) voluntary aided schools;
(iv) foundation schools;
(v) Academies; and
(vi) city technology colleges and city colleges for the technology of the arts (there are none in Oxfordshire at present);
(b) Diocesan Representatives – Must be appointed following a nomination by the relevant body or person prescribed in relation to the religion or religious denomination in regulation 12(7) of the Admission Arrangements Regulations.
One representative from each body or person representing the religion or religious denomination of any foundation or voluntary schools or Academies in the relevant area which are designated as having a religious character by an order under section 69(3)1 or section 124B(9)2;
(c) at least one parent member who must be resident in the relevant area, and the parent of a child who:
(a) has attained the age of two and is receiving primary education; or
(b) is of compulsory school age at the time of their appointment.
1 Of SSFA 1998 2 Section 124 B is inserted by the Independent Schools (Employment of Teachers in Schools with a Religious Character) Regulations 2003 (S.I. 2003/2037)
Agenda Item 6
Page 7
AF6 – page 2
AF_JUN1610R03.doc
(d) Community Interest Representative – at least one person who appears to the members appointed under sub-paragraphs (a) to (c) to represent the interests of any section of the community in the relevant area, and who is not eligible for appointment as a member under any of those sub-paragraphs.
(e) Members falling within paragraph (1)(d) must be appointed following a recommendation by the members appointed under paragraph (1)(a) to (c).
(2) Local Authority Representatives – Any Councillor members will be nominated by group leaders, agreed at the first meeting of the Cabinet following the elections and shall be in proportion to the political balance of the Council as a whole, if possible. Councillors will become ineligible for membership if they cease to be members of the local authority.
(3) A representative for the RAF will also be appointed following a nomination from the respective body within the area for which the forum has been established (The Army is content to be represented by the Children’s Education Advisory Service).
(4) The Academy Representative shall represent all of the academies within the county and shall rotate on a yearly basis, to ensure fairness.
(5) The forum, through the Chairman, may invite people with particular expertise or interests, as appropriate, to speak at a meeting but these people will not have voting rights, nor be considered members.
(6) Relevant local authority officers will attend meetings of the forum and provide written and verbal briefings, but will not be considered members.
Non Core Members
The non core members shall comprise one RAF Representative, one (additional) Community Representative (Children’s Education Advisory Service), four school representatives (two secondary community school representatives (one of whom should have experience and knowledge of special needs, one primary community school representative and one primary church aided school representative), two Councillor representatives, one governor representative and one parent admission advisor representative. There is currently one vacancy, to be allocated to another suitable stakeholder. TERMS OF OFFICE
(6) Subject to the provisions of the regulatiosn, persons appointed to be members of a forum hold and vacate office in accordance with the terms of their appointment and, on ceasing to be members of the forum, are eligible for reappointment.
(7) Members will serve for a term of 4 years, subject to them remaining eligible and subject to the terms of appointment of the local authority, apart from the Academy representative who will rotate on a yearly basis to enable each Academy to participate. No person may be appointed as a member for a fixed period exceeding 4 years.
Page 8
AF6 – page 3
AF_JUN1610R03.doc
(8) A member must vacate office:
(a) in the case of School’s representatives, if they cease to be a head teacher or governor of a school falling within the schools group;
(b) in the case of a Diocesan representative, if the body who nominated the member are of the opinion that the member should no longer be a member of the forum and notify the secretary accordingly;
(c) in the case of a parent member, if they cease to be a parent member within the meaning of paragraph 1(c) above;
(d) in the case of a person representing the community interest, if the authority, following a recommendation from the members appointed under (1)(a) to (c) above, are of the opinion that the member should no longer be a member of the forum;
(9) Every member of a forum must vacate office if the forum is dissolved pursuant to regulation 15(2) (ie if the authority decides to set up a joint forum).
(10) Any member may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Secretary of the forum.
2. ALTERNATE MEMBERS (SUBSTITUTIONS)
(11) Subject to paragraphs (a) to (f) below any member of a forum may, by giving written notice to the secretary, nominate an alternate member to attend meetings of the forum in their absence, and such nomination remains effective until it is withdrawn.. The alternate member will notify the forum secretary whether they are attending for a particular meeting or whether they are substituting until further notice. Notice must be provided to the local authority’s nominated officers at least 2 hours prior to any meeting and ideally no later than the day before the meeting.
(a) A School’s representative may only nominate an alternate member who is a head teacher or governor of a school which falls within the same sub-paragraph of 1(c) above as the school of which the member in question is a governor or head teacher.
(b) A Diocesan representative may not nominate an alternate member unless the person or body by which the member was nominated consents to the proposed nomination.
(c) A parent member may only nominate an alternate member who is a parent within the meaning of 1(c) above.
(d) A person representing the community interest may not nominate an alternate member unless the authority consents to the proposed nomination.
(e) Local authority members may only nominate an alternate member who is a member of the local authority.
(f) The RAF representative may only nominate an alternate member who is a representative of the RAF.
(g) The Academy representative may only nominate an alternate member who is a representative of the Academy.
Page 9
AF6 – page 4
AF_JUN1610R03.doc
3. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN
(12) At the first meeting of a forum and each meeting referred to in paragraph (13) the members must elect two members of the forum to be the chairman and vice-chairman by a majority of votes. In the event of there being the same number of votes for two or more candidates a second ballot will be taken. If the voting remains the same a coin will be tossed. (13) Subject to paragraph (14), the chairman and vice-chairman hold office as such until the next meeting which falls after the date which is a year after the meeting at which they were elected, and on ceasing to hold office are to be eligible for re-election.
(14) A person ceases to hold office as the chairman or vice-chairman:
(i) on ceasing to be a member of the forum, or
(ii) if they resign office by written notice given to the secretary.
(15) In the event of a casual vacancy occurring in the office of chairman or vice-chairman the members must at their next meeting elect one of their members to fill that vacancy and a member so elected holds office until the date of the meeting at which the chairman or vice-chairman would have held office had the vacancy not occurred.
(16) In the event of the chairman and vice-chairman both being absent from any meeting the members will elect a chairman for the meeting from amongst those members present.
4. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
(17) The members shall appoint a person/persons, nominated by the local authority, not being a member of the forum, to act as secretary to the forum.
(18) The secretary of the forum will ensure that they administratively support the forum by preparing agendas, producing minutes and circulating all relevant papers, within a minimum of 5 working days in advance of the meetings where possible.
5. MEETINGS
(19) Subject to any provision made by the Regulations, forum members may regulate the procedure of the forum. Under the Regulations, the forum must meet at least twice a year and it is the duty of the secretary or, in the absence of the secretary, the authority, to notify every member at least one week in advance of the time and place of each meeting. Dates of meetings will be confirmed at the inaugural meeting (having been scheduled by the Committee Services Manager) and thereafter on a yearly basis. Future meeting dates for the following calendar year shall be brought to the forum’s October meeting for approval. (Meetings shall be held in November (last week of), February (last week of), June (mid eg 17th) and October (last week of)).
Page 10
AF6 – page 5
AF_JUN1610R03.doc
(20) Meetings of the forum shall be held in public and a note of the outcome of each meeting shall be published by the secretary of the forum as soon as practicable after the meeting.
(21) Meetings shall be held in term time at a time to aid attendance by schools at 3.30 pm.
(22) Members of the forum and local authority officers must submit items for inclusion on the agenda to the secretary at least 10 working days prior to the meeting and ideally at least a week before agenda despatch. The chairman will prioritise items but all items brought to the forum that fall within its terms of reference should be discussed - even if they are not considered a priority - subject to time constraints.
(23)The agenda for each meeting will be agreed by the chairman, local authority officers and the secretary of the forum. (24) The agenda and supporting papers will be sent to members at least 5 working days before the date of the meeting where possible.
(25) Extraordinary meetings of the forum can be convened by the chairman or by at least five members represented on the forum.
(26) In any vote regarding the exercise of the forum’s power to refer an objection to the adjudicator pursuant to section 88H, the vote must be carried by a simple majority of those members present and, in the case of an equality of votes, the chairman, or in the absence of the chairman, the vice-chairman has a second or casting vote.
(27) Minutes of meetings following approval from the chairman and relevant officer will be sent to members as soon as practicable.
(28) Although by law, only Councillors are obliged to declare their interests, all members of the forum are encouraged to declare their interests, in the spirit of transparency and good governance. Members of the forum should declare an interest in any individual proposal, which directly affects a school at which they have an interest either financially, or as a governor or parent. Interests should be declared at agenda item 2 if possible (Declarations of Interest) and if not, no later than at the start of the item in question, stating the nature of the interest. It is a member’s responsibility to decide whether the provisions regarding the declaration of interests relate to them in particular circumstances and forum members may wish to seek the advice of the Monitoring Officer prior to the meeting. Forum members are asked to refer to the Members’ Code of Conduct in Section DD of the County Council’s Constitution for further guidance.
Page 11
AF6 – page 6
AF_JUN1610R03.doc
6. QUORUM
(29) The quorum of a meeting will be one quarter of the whole number of forum members (ie. 5).
7. DECISION MAKING
(30) Members of the forum will wherever possible try to reach a consensus of opinion. If however, following discussion it is the view of the chairman that a consensus cannot be reached, he/she will instruct the secretary to record this in the minutes.
8. ADVICE AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FORUM
(31) The Forum shall promulgate its advice and recommendations to all admission authorities, maintained schools, Academies, city technology colleges or city colleges for the technology of the arts [where relevant] within the relevant area of the Authority, and make available such advice and recommendations to any other persons with an interest. (32) Advice and recommendations of the forum will be published by the forum secretary on the County Council’s website and in the ‘meeting and events’ section of ‘schools news’.
9. CONSTITUTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE FORUM
(33) The forum will act in accordance with the Terms of Reference (Refer Appendix 1).
(34) Forum members will review the Constitution and Terms of Reference after one year from adoption, and thereafter they may review the Constitution and/or the Terms of Reference at such times as they think fit.
June 2010
Page 12
AF6 – page 7
AF_JUN1610R03.doc
Appendix 1
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Purpose and functions of a forum
16. (1) For the purposes of section 85A(1) (purpose of admission forums) the role of a forum is to consider and advise on the fairness of admission arrangements for schools in the relevant area, and in particular:
(a) the extent to which the current admission arrangements in the relevant area serve the interests of looked after children, children with disabilities and children with special educational needs;
(b) the effectiveness of any fair access protocol in place in the relevant area;
(c) the effectiveness of any scheme for co-ordinating admission arrangements made or adopted under section 88M(1) in the relevant area and, where relevant, any adjoining local authority area; and
(d) details of any other matters which affect the fair operation of admission arrangements for relevant schools in the relevant area.
(2) A forum must:
(a) advise the authority and the governing bodies of all voluntary aided and foundation schools in the area by 30th November each year which persons or bodies in the area the forum considers have an interest in proposed admission arrangements for the purposes of regulation 12(2)(h) of the Admission Arrangements Regulations;
(b) consider and advise on any proposed qualifying scheme for the co-ordination of admission arrangements referred to it by the authority pursuant to regulation 5 of the School Admissions (Co-ordination of Admission Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2008;
(c) consider admission arrangements referred to it under regulation 12(2)(f) of the Admission Arrangements Regulations for the purposes of consultation and must consider whether to exercise its power to refer an objection to any such arrangements to the adjudicator pursuant to section 88H(2);
(d) consider any composite prospectus(10) published by the authority and advise the authority on whether this might be improved to raise the standard of information provided to parents; and
(e) consider whether to produce a report for the purposes of section 85A(1A).
Advice and recommendations of a forum
17. A forum must promulgate their advice and recommendations produced under regulation 16(1) for the purposes of section 85A(1) to all admission authorities, maintained schools, Academies, city technology colleges or city colleges for the
Page 13
AF6 – page 8
AF_JUN1610R03.doc
technology of the arts within the relevant area, and must make that advice available to any other persons with an interest.
Forum reports
18.(1) For the purposes of section 85A(1A) (matters that may be included in a forum report) the prescribed matters are:
(a) the forum’s analysis of the extent to which admission arrangements, or any aspect of admission arrangements, in the relevant area ensure fair access to educational opportunity;(11) and
(b) any recommendation the forum wishes to make to improve fair access as a result of their analysis.
(2) For the purposes of this regulation “admission arrangements” includes—
(a) the scheme for co-ordinating admission arrangements made or adopted under section 88M(1) in the relevant area and, where relevant, an adjoining local authority area; and
(b) any school policy which, in the opinion of the forum, affects or may affect, fair access to educational opportunity in the relevant area.
Provision of information to forum
19. For the purposes of section 85A(1B) (information that may be requested by a forum) the prescribed information is such information as the forum requires to enable it to carry out its functions under section 85A(1A) and regulation 18.
Publication of forum reports
20. A forum report produced pursuant to section 85A(1A) must be sent to the adjudicator.
Sarah McCarthy-Fry Minister of State
Department for Children, Schools and Families 3rd December 2008
EXPLANATORY NOTE (This note is not part of the Regulations)
These Regulations are made under sections 85A, 85B, 88P, 88Q and 138 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (SSFA 1998) and come into force on 10th February 2009.
Part 2 deals with local education authority (LA) reports to the adjudicator. The duty on LAs to produce an annual report to the adjudicator is introduced by section 88P of SSFA 1998, inserted by the Education and Skills Act 2008.
It prescribes the matters relevant to admissions to maintained schools, Academies, city technology colleges and city colleges for the technology of the arts in the area of the authority which are to be included in LA reports (regulations 4 and 5), and the date by which such reports are to be made (regulation 7). Section 88Q provides that certain bodies and persons must provide information to the LA on request to enable the LA to compile their report to the adjudicator. Those persons include the clerk to an admission appeal panel (by virtue of regulation 6).
Page 14
AF6 – page 9
AF_JUN1610R03.doc
Parts 3 and 4 deal with admission forums established by local authorities under section 85A of the SSFA 1998. They replace the Education (Admission Forums) (England) Regulations 2002 and the Education (Admission Forums) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2007, which are revoked by these Regulations.
In Part 3 (constitution, meetings and proceedings) they prescribe the membership of a forum (regulation 8), the appointment and tenure of members (regulation 9), the appointment of alternate members (regulation 10) the election of a chairman and vice-chairman, and appointment of a secretary (regulations 11 and 12), they make provision about the meetings of a forum and the establishment of sub-committees (regulations 13 and 14). They also provide for two or more LAs to establish a joint forum (regulation 15).
In Part 4 (purpose and functions) they prescribe the purpose of admission forums established by LAs under section 85A (regulation 16) and the manner in which the advice and recommendations of a forum are to be published (regulation 17).
They prescribe the matters which are to be included in forum reports made under section 85A and the information that may be requested by a forum to enable it to compile its report (regulation 19) and prescribe that the forum report is to be submitted to the adjudicator (regulation 20).
(10) Regulation 5 of, and Schedule 2 to, the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 (S.I.2008/3093) require every local authority to publish a composite prospectus, or prospectuses, by 12th September each year containing information for parents about schools in their area. Back [10]
(11) Section 13A(1)(b) of the Education Act 1996, substituted by section 1 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006, requires all local authorities in England to exercise their functions, so far as they are capable of being so exercised, with a view to ensuring fair access to educational opportunity for children. This duty is extended to all admission authorities by the School Admissions Code. Back [11]
Page 15
Page 16
This page is intentionally left blank
AFJUN1610R080.doc
ADMISSION FORUM – 16 JUNE 2010
ADMISSIONS OUTCOMES Introduction
1. This briefing note is largely concerned with primary admissions. While I have included some general information on secondary allocations at the end of this note a more detailed breakdown by area will be tabled at the meeting. Abingdon
2. At initial allocation no one had to be offered a place outside of the town. However, there were 60 late applications for primary schools in Abingdon.
3. In order to avoid Abingdon children having to be transported to school outside of the town Thameside School was prepared to admit above its Published Admission Number (PAN) of 30. However, once the second admissions round was completed only 10 additional places were required at Thameside. This was because of withdrawals from other schools and parents seeking places outside Abingdon.
4. Thameside is due to admit 40 children in September 2010 and still has vacancies for late applicants. Banbury
5. There were no significant school place issues at primary level. Bicester
6. At the initial allocation we offered additional places at Langford Village and Five Acres. At the second allocation we offered additional places at Southwold, Chesterton and Bure Park and further places at Five Acres. We have also offered 2 further places above the PAN at Longfield School. Eynsham
7. There were no significant school place issues at primary level. Henley
8. At the initial allocation it was a major challenge finding sufficient places in the Henley area and this was largely achieved through the cooperation of the Head and Governing Body of Badgemore School. At initial allocation the Governors of Trinity School would not accept additional children without guarantees regarding funding and given that these could not be given we offered 45 places at this school (up to its admission number) rather than 60. Shiplake, Valley Road, Trinity and Sacred Heart were all full at initial allocation and we offered 25 additional places at Badgemore. We had 6 late
Agenda Item 7
Page 17
AF7
AFJUN1610R080.doc
applications for a school place in Henley but we also had a number of withdrawals. We subsequently offered 5 places above PAN at Trinity School at the second allocation.
9. Badgemore is currently due to admit 20 children – 5 above the school’s PAN.
Oxford 10. In the area of Oxford city (defined on a very broad basis) we started the
process with a shortfall of approximately 160 places (including those available in Wheatley). However, because a range of schools were willing to admit additional children - Cutteslowe, Larkrise, New Hinksey, St Christophers, St Nicholas', Bayards Hill, Orchard Meadow, West Oxford, Botley, Sandhills, Rose Hill - we were able to offer every on time applicant a place, although there were some children who had to be placed at Wheatley and North Kidlington. The very difficult situation for families living in Wolvercote was resolved by offering additional places at the second allocation.
11. In order to cope with late applications New Marston and St Andrew’s were
requested to each admit up to 25 additional children. Neither school was willing to agree to this approach but given the need to avoid placements outside Oxford the two schools were directed to admit above PAN. Both schools were unhappy with this decision to offer additional places.
12. We also requested small increases at several other schools (shown in the
table below).
Table 2. Oxford City
School Name PAN Offers at initial allocation
Number of late applicants prior to the 2nd allocation
After the 2nd allocation
Bayards Hill 40 60 5 60 St Andrews ( 25 additional places, directed to admit) 30 30 3 55 Windmill 60 60 2 60 Wood Farm 40 45 1 45 Sandhills 30 60 5 60 Wheatley 50 50 6 50 St Christopher’s 45 60 4 60 St Francis 40 40 2 40 Larkrise 45 60 5 60 Church Cowley 60 60 4 60
Page 18
AF7
AFJUN1610R080.doc
SS Mary & John 60 60 2 60 East Oxford 40 40 3 40 John Henry Newman 60 60 4 59 Orchard Meadow 30 45 2 47 Pegasus 60 60 0 60 Rose Hill (a further 5 additional places agreed) 40 45 5 48 Windale (5 additional places agreed) 50 50 55 Our Lady's 45 45 3 45 St Aloysius 30 30 1 30 St John Fisher 30 30 0 30 St Joseph's 30 30 1 30 West Oxford 15 30 2 29 Botley 45 60 3 52 St Philip and St James 60 62 2 61 St Barnabas 32 32 4 32 St Ebbes 45 45 1 45 St Michaels 30 30 0 30 St Nicholas 45 60 3 60 New Marston (up to 25 additional places, directed to admit) 30 30 2 39 Cutteslowe 30 60 5 58 New Hinksey (a further 5) 20 25 2 27
Wolvercote (additional places agreed) 30 30 2 46 Totals 1257 1424 89 1473
13. In F1 for September 2010 we currently have 7 spare places at Botley School
and 3 at New Marston School. Wheatley
14. Wheatley Primary School has met demand but there are no remaining places.
Page 19
AF7
AFJUN1610R080.doc
Kidlington 15. The lack of places for late applicants was resolved by the release of places at
Wolvercote.
Thame 16. John Hampden School’s PAN was increased from 40 to 45. 45 have been
offered and some children have been refused and have lodged appeals. St Joseph's Catholic School is also full.
Wallingford
17. At initial allocation we offered 5 additional places at St Nicholas’ Infants’
School. This school was asked to take a further 10 to bring the intake to 60.
Wantage 18. There were insufficient primary places in the Wantage area and we coped by
placing additional children at Grove and Charlton. In the second allocation we offered 4 places at St Amands School (a distance of 4/5 miles for some children) in order to meet demand. There are currently 7 remaining places at St Amands School for late comers.
Watlington
19. Aston Rowant, Ewelme, Stadhampton and Watlington Schools are full or
over-subscribed. Chalgrove and Lewknor Schools have places. We increased the number of places at RAF Benson from 30 to 45 to accommodate late applicants and changes of preference (the children affected are from military families).
Witney
20. There were sufficient places in primary schools in Witney to meet demand.
However, despite having been expanded to admit 45 children per year Madley Brook was unable to fully meet the demand for places.
21. Due to a decision by an appeal panel Madley Brook will admit 46 rather than
45 children in September 2010.
Woodstock 22. There were 8 applications on behalf of children living in the designated area
for Woodstock Primary who could not be offered a place at that school. All these children were offered places outside of Woodstock.
Page 20
AF7
AFJUN1610R080.doc
Additional Places 23. I have attached a table showing the additional places added across
Oxfordshire to ensure that sufficient places were available to cope with the increase in demand.
Future Demand 2010
24. There are sufficient places to accommodate any likely late applicants in “hot spots” such as Abingdon, Henley, Watlington, and Wantage. However, there are only a small number of places in Oxford City. 2011 Onwards Oxford City
25. There are plans in place to physically expand a number of schools in the Oxford City area. These developments are at varying stages in the planning process.
Oxford City Area
School Number Remarks St Nicholas 45 to 60 Building work underway Wood Farm 45 to 60 Design stage. Sandhills 30 to 60 Formal consultation has now closed Larkrise 45 to 60 Feasibility study required, formal
consultation in process New Marston 30 to 60 Formal consultation in the Autumn St Christopher’s
45 to 60 Formal consultation in the Autumn for 2012
Cutteslowe 30 to 60 Feasibility study required, formal consultation in the Autumn
Botley 45 to 60 Formal consultation in the Autumn in 2012
Orchard Meadow
30 to 45
Formal consultation in the Autumn
New Hinksey 20 to 25 Feasibility study required, formal consultation in the Autumn
East Oxford 40 to 60 Feasibility study required St Barnabas Currently 32 Feasibility study required St Ebbes Currently 45 Feasibility study required Windale Currently 50 Feasibility study required Windmill Currently 60 Feasibility study required Bayards Hill Currently 40 Rebuild on hold – funding issues
Page 21
AF7
AFJUN1610R080.doc
Henley 26. In Henley there will be a public consultation on the need for expansion at one
or more primary schools. This will take place this year.
List of schools admitting above their Published Admission Number (PAN)
27. A list of schools at which the number of places offered exceeds the current PAN is attached as Appendix A.
Preference statistics
28. The key preference statistics are attached as Appendix B and greater detail is
shown in Appendix C. They show that at the second allocation stage there was an increase in those Oxfordshire residents receiving a first preference school. This is true of both primary and secondary allocations. At secondary level 88.52 % of Oxfordshire residents received an offer of a first preference school on 1 March and on 4 May this increased to 90.28%, an increase of 1.76%. At primary level 87.68% of applicants received an offer of a first preference school on 1 March and on 4 May this increased to 88.84%, an increase of 1.16%.
29. We originally published that the LA had 7,226 primary school places available
but given the demand we increased the number of places to 7,730, an increase of 504.
30. With regard to secondary school places we published that we had 6,866
places available. We have increased this number to 6,934, an increase of 68. 31. For the second secondary allocation on 4th May 2010, the Admissions Team
dealt with 899 (late and continued interest) preferences from 626 children. This compares with this point last year when the Admissions Team dealt with 707 (late and continued interest) preferences from 500 children.
32. For the second primary allocation on 4th May 2010, the Admissions Team
dealt with 1,838 (late) preferences from 1,090 children. This compares with the same point last year when the Admissions Team dealt with 1,379 (late) preferences from 802 children.
Neil Darlington Service Manager for Admissions June 2010
Page 22
AF7 APPENDIX ASeptember Intake 2010 Proposed Admission Number Increases
School NamePublished
AN Proposed Number Number Agreed Extra Places LA Reqest Comments
Appleton Primary 20 23 23 3 Yes To meet demand for lst prefsBadgemore, Henley 15 40 40 25 Yes To meet demand in HenleyBampton 20 22 22 2 Request from SchoolBayards Hill, Oxford 40 60 60 15 Yes To meet demand in CityBerinsfield 40 45 45 5 YesBletchingdon 10 12 12 2Bloxham 50 60 60 10 To meet demandBotley CP 45 60 60 15 Yes To meet demand in CityBure Park 60 73 73 13Charlton Primary 40 45 45 5 Yes To meet demand for lst prefsChesterton 17 19 19 2Clanfield (Yr 3 Jun trans) 10 14 14 4 To meet demand Clanfield F1 intake 10 11 11 1 Request from SchoolCutteslowe 30 60 60 30 Yes To meet demand in the CityDr South's 15 16 16 1 Request from SchoolEynsham 45 47 47 2Faringdon Infants 60 70 70 10 YesFinmere 7 9 9 2Fir Tree 40 46 46 6 Yes To meet lst prefs from Infant schFive Acres, Ambrosden 30 45 45 To meet demandFive Acres, Ambrosden 30 (Further Inc) to 52 52 22Great Milton 25 30 30 5 Request from SchoolGrove (Wantage) 15 30 30 15 YesHarwell 25 30 30 5 Yes To meet first preferencesJohn Hampden, Thame 40 45 45 5 To meet demandKingham (Reduction) 30 29 29 Reduce by 1 To allow for SEN late transferLangford Village 60 68 68 8 To admit catchment and siblingsLarkrise 45 60 60 15 Yes To meet demand in the CityLittle Milton 10 15 15 5 Yes To meet demandLongfields, Bicester 40 45 5 5Madley Brook, Witney 30 45 45 15 Yes To meet demandMarcham 15 20 20 5 Yes To offer catchment applicantsNew Hinksey 20 28 28 8 Yes To meet demand in the City
AFJUN1610R090.xls
Page 23
AF7 APPENDIX ANew Marston 30 55 55 25 Yes To meet demand in the CityOrchard Meadow 30 45 45 15 To meet demand in CityPeppard 15 15 19 4 Yes To meet demandRose Hill 40 (Further Inc) to 50 50 10 Yes To meet demand Sandhills 30 60 60 30 Yes To meet demand in the CitySibford Gower 20 22 22 2 YesSonning Common 45 60 60 15 Yes To meet demandSouth Moreton 25 27 27 2Southwold 50 60 60 10St Andrews, Oxford 30 55 55 25 Yes To meet demand in the CitySt Blaise 10 15 15 5St Christopher's, Oxford 45 60 60 15 YesSt John's RC, Banbury 38 43 43 5 To admit Cats 1,2,3,4,& 5St Laurence, Warborough 11 15 15 4St Nicholas Infant, Wall'ford 45 60 60 15 Yes To meet demand (further inc)St Nicholas Primary, Oxford 45 60 60 15 Yes To meet demand in the CitySt Peter's Cassington 13 15 15 2St Swithins, Kennington 40 46 46 6 YesStoke Row 15 17 17 2Stonesfield 20 27 27 7 Yes New Indicated No for 2011Tackley 20 25 25 5 To offer catchment applicantsThameside 30 55 55 25 YesTrinity Henley 45 55 55 10 Yes To meet demand in HenleyWatchfield 40 45 45 5West Oxford 15 30 30 15 Yes To meet demand in the CityWindale 50 55 55 5 Yes To meet demand in the City
`Secondary SchoolsThe Cooper Bicester 210 220 220 10 To meet demandBartholomew 170 189 189 19Faringdon CC 180 188 188 8 To meet demandSt Birinus 240 255 255 15Banbury 220 236 236 16 (now) yes To meet demand - can take more if needed
AFJUN1610R090.xls
Page 24
AF7 APPENDIX B
SECONDARY PERCENTAGES01-Mar 04-May
First Prefs offered (all applicants) 86.82 88.48First Prefs offered (Oxon residents) 88.52 90.28
Offered 1st, 2nd or 3rd Pref (all applicants) 96.83 97.74Offered 1st, 2nd or 3rd Pref (Oxon residents) 97.02 97.90
PRIMARY PERCENTAGES
First Prefs offered (all applicants) 87.68 88.84
Offered 1st, 2nd or 3rd Pref (Oxon residents) 95.09 96.13
AF_JUN1610R10.xls Page 25
Page 26
This page is intentionally left blank
AF
7A
PP
EN
DIX
C
SE
CO
ND
AR
Y P
ER
CE
NT
AG
ES
01-M
ar01
-Mar
01-M
ar04
-May
04-M
ay04
-May
Co
nsi
der
edA
lloca
ted
%C
on
sid
ered
Allo
cate
d%
Firs
t Pre
fs o
ffere
d (a
ll ap
plic
ants
)66
0157
3186
.82
6539
5786
88.4
8F
irst P
refs
offe
red
(Oxo
n re
side
nts)
6278
5557
88.5
261
9255
9090
.28
Offe
red
1st,
2nd
or 3
rd P
ref (
all a
pplic
ants
)66
0163
9296
.83
6539
6391
97.7
4O
ffere
d 1s
t, 2n
d or
3rd
Pre
f (O
xon
resi
dent
s)62
7860
9197
.02
6192
6062
97.9
0
PR
IMA
RY
PE
RC
EN
TA
GE
S01
-Mar
01-M
ar01
-Mar
04-M
ay04
-May
04-M
ayC
on
sid
ered
Allo
cate
d%
Co
nsi
der
edA
lloca
ted
%
Firs
t Pre
fs o
ffere
d (a
ll ap
plic
ants
)69
5060
9487
.68
7211
6406
88.8
4
Offe
red
1st,
2nd
or 3
rd P
ref (
all a
pplic
ants
)69
5066
0995
.09
7211
6932
96.1
3
AF
_JU
N16
10R
11.x
ls
Page 27
Page 28
This page is intentionally left blank
Devon Local Admissions ForumAnnual Report 2008
Devon County Council
Children and Young People’s Services
Agenda Item 9
Page 29
2 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
Contents
Introduction 3
Glossary 4
Key issues and recommendations 6PreferencesAppealsEthnic and social mixVulnerable childrenMonitoring the In Year Admissions PolicyInfant class size
Other issues 15
More information 18
Notes 19
Local Admissions Forum (LAF)
Page 30
Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008 3
Devon Local Admissions Forum covers the Devon County Council area and is a mandatory body set up under the School Standards and Framework Act 1988.
The Forum organises discussion between all admission authorities for voluntary aided, voluntary controlled and local authority community schools, on how best to organise admissions in the local area to meet as many parents’ preferences as possible; and to reach agreement about challenging considerations, such as providing school places and sharing pupils with challenging behaviour.
The membership of the Devon LAF has been revised in line with regulations issued by the Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF). As well as the admission authorities, LAF includes representation from community groups such as:
• Parent Teacher Associations (PTAs)
• Devon Association of Governors (DAG)
• neighbouring local authorities
to help ensure a consistent approach.
Devon LAF meets approximately three times a year at regular intervals at County Hall in Exeter.
LegislationThe Education and Inspections Act 2006 gave Local Admission Forums the power to produce an annual report on whether school admission arrangements support fair access, with recommendations for improvement. Devon LAF has until the end of December to consider this report and submit it to Devon County Council, schools and (where appropriate) neighbouring local authorities and their forums.
The report is also sent to the Schools Commissioner who produces a biennial national review for Parliament, which both identifies good practice and where fair access is not being achieved. The first of these reviews is due in April 2009, and will be based on national data and LAF reports.
ContextDevon is largely rural, (except for the city of Exeter which has five of the secondary schools) and provides 316 primary, 10 special and 37 secondary schools. All secondary schools are mixed comprehensive schools, except for one grammar school.
All data used in this report, unless otherwise indicated, is correct at spring 2008, and refers to the admissions round 2007/08 – this means all pupils entering school from September 2008. The report will be reviewed in February 2009 in light of the revised School Admissions Code of Practice.
This report was presented at the LAF meeting on 20 November 2008
Introduction
Page 31
4 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
Admissions roundThe normal admission round means the time when children would usually apply for, and be admitted to, a school place, such as:
• reception• year 3 in a junior school• year 7 for secondary schools.
Designated or catchment areaMost schools serve a specific geographical area, called the designated or catchment area. In most cases children who live in a school’s designated area will have a higher priority for admission.
DioceseThe Diocese of Exeter includes the Diocesan Board of Education. Its purpose is to develop and promote best practice in parishes, schools and colleges. www.exeter.anglican.org/schools
DowryA sum of money the local authority may give to a school to improve the chance of a child being admitted when there are identifiable challenges posed by the child’s individual needs.
Equal preferenceA system for ranking preferences according to over-subscription criteria which gives priority to children without referring to the order of other schools named as a preference by their parents. So the child living closer is ranked higher in priority than a child living further away, even if they had preferred another school.
Extended servicesThe development of a range of extended services which are provided, or signposted, by schools www.devon.gov.uk/extendedschools
First preference firstOver-subscription criteria which previously gave priority to children according to the order of other schools named as a preference by their parents, or only considering applications stated as a first preference. This is now prohibited by the School Admissions Code of Practice.
In year admissionsWhen children need a school place at a time other than when places would normally be allocated. Different admission arrangements are used for these children.
In Year Admissions PolicyThe policy used to allocate places for children needing in year admissions. This helps make sure people who move into an area outside the normal admission round can find a place.
Local authorityDevon is a large rural county. The historic area of Devon comprises three council areas. Addresses in Plymouth or Torbay are served by their own unitary authority and Devon County Council is the local authority for the rest of Devon.
Local Learning Community (LLC)A framework for schools to collaborate and share responsibility locally for children and young people’s learning and wellbeing in their communities.
Managed Moves ProtocolPart of the Determined Admissions Arrangements. The Protocol explains what happens when a managed move to another school or college is the best thing for a pupil and the school or college.http://www4.devon.gov.uk/eal/dgfl/docs/Promoting-inclusion-managed-moves.pdf
Glossary
Page 32
Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008 5
Parenting supportSchools should encourage parents to seek support and provide access to parenting support, including:
• advice and support• access to parenting groups using
structured, evidence-based parenting programmes
• family learning sessions.www.devon.gov.uk/extendedschools
Planned Admission Number (PAN)This is the number of children which can be admitted to each year group in the school. The PAN is decided by looking at the number of children in a school’s local area who will need a place, and the physical accommodation at the school.
Schools CommissionerThe Schools Commissioner has a wide remit focused on promoting four key themes: choice and diversity in schools; fair access; parental involvement and the new role of local authorities as commissioners of services. www.dcsf.gov.uk/schoolscommissioner
School Transport PolicyThe policy covers circumstances where Devon County Council has a duty to provide transport to school or college for children and young peoplewww.devon.gov.uk/school_transport
School typesCommunity: a state school which is wholly owned and maintained by the local authority. The LA is the admitting authority and has main responsibility for deciding arrangements for admitting pupils
Voluntary Aided: a school with a Roman Catholic or Church of England ethos. These schools serve a defined area based on parish boundaries and the governing body is responsible for admission and appeal arrangements. These schools usually give priority to children from their faith.
Voluntary Controlled: a school which is maintained by the local authority, with a foundation (generally religious) which appoints some of the governing body. The LA is the admitting authority.
Special Educational Needs (SEN) and Statements of SENChildren with Special Educational Needs (SEN) have been assessed as needing extra support in school to help them with their educational difficulties. A statement of SEN is a legal document which the local authority and the child’s school must follow. It identifies the help a child will receive to meet their educational needs.
The First StepGuidance explaining the process for applying for a place in a primary school or infant school. All parents must apply for reception class places using the form in The First Step.www.devon.gov.uk/firststep09
The Next StepGuidance explaining the process for applying for a place in a secondary school. All parents must apply for year 7 class places using the form in The Next Step.www.devon.gov.uk/nextstep09
TransitionTransition is an on-going process which takes place across the final years of a child’s time at school and into the early years of whatever comes next. This might be further education, vocational training, life skills work, independent living or social opportunities.
Page 33
6 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
Preferences
Devon has always operated an equal preference system, rather than first preference first.
The Planned Admission Number (PAN) in Devon this year was:
Number of places Type of school
Primary schools 6973 Community and coluntary controlled
1201 Voluntary aided
8174 Total
Secondary schools 8009 Total
The number of places offered was:
Number of places Type of school Places offered as
percent of PAN
Primary schools 5710 Community and voluntary controlled 82%
1043 Voluntary aided 87%
6753 Total 83%
Secondary schools 7730 Total 97%
Demand for places
• 72 out of 252 community and voluntary controlled schools offered places at, or over, the PAN before appeals.
• 25 out of 53 voluntary aided schools offered places at, or over, the PAN before appeals.
• 37 community and voluntary controlled primary schools offered a number of places which was 50% or less of the PAN
• 9 voluntary aided primary schools offered a number of places which was 50% or less of the PAN.
This information is available at www.devon.gov.uk/firststep0910.pdf
Key issues and recommendations
Page 34
Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008 7
Community and voluntary controlled primary schools:
Beaford Beames Black TorringtonBrayford Bridgerule BroadwoodwidgerBurlescombe Charleton Cheriton BishopColyton Dalwood GoodleighHartland Hawkchurch High BickingtonHighhampton Horrabridge Kentisbury Kings NymptonKingswear Lew Trenchard Mary Tavy and BrentorMembury Musbury PrincetownSalcombe Shaugh Prior ShebbearSpreyton Stoke Canon SutcombeUmberleigh Wembury West and East PutfordWillowbrook Yealmpton Yeo Valley
Voluntary aided primary schools:
Chittlehampton Clyst Honiton DoltonLynton Sparkwell St John the Baptist, Dartmouth St Joseph’s, Newton Abbot
Almost all secondary schools admitted numbers within 10% of the PAN except:
School Number of places offered PAN Number of places offered as
a percent of PANDartmouth Community College
74 90 82%
St James’ School, Exeter 134 190 71%
Honiton Community College 171 192 89%
Newton Abbot College 162 203 80%
This information is available at www.devon.gov.uk/nxt09-whathappendin2008.pdf
LAF recommendations
1. The primary schools with particularly low numbers proportional to their PAN should be reviewed with a view to revising the PAN.
2. The PANs of the four secondary schools which didn’t admit numbers within 10% of the PAN should be reviewed.
3. Expanding secondary school places through PANs or otherwise to meet more preferences and make inclusion policies more effective should be considered.
Page 35
8 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
Preferences metFigures from the end of the 2008 admissions round. Parents are offered two preferences for primary schools and three for secondary.
First preference met Second or third preference met
Preferences not met
Secondary schools 92% 6.8% 1.2%
Primary schools 96.7% 1.1% 1.3%
This information is available at www.devon.gov.uk/firststep0910.pdf and www.devon.gov.uk/nxt09-whathappendin2008.pdf
Grammar schoolsDevon has only one grammar school: Colyton Grammar School. Devon’s bordering authorities of Plymouth and Torbay both have grammar schools.
Movements across local authorities Cross border statistics for 2007
Intake Torbay Plymouth Dorset Somerset Cornwall Total
Devon children transferring to
175 92 81 6 48 402
Children transferring into Devon from
160 33 10 29 3 235
Loss or gain -15 -59 -71 23 -45 -167
Data collected on 1/03/2007 net loss
Cross border statistics for 2008
Intake Torbay Plymouth Dorset Somerset Cornwall Others Total
Devon children transferring to
180 118 59 14 33 0 404
Children transferring into Devon from
137 34 10 24 6 24 235
Loss or gain -43 -84 -49 10 -27 24 -169
Data collected on 2/11/2008
netloss
Page 36
Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008 9
Choice AdviceThe LAF received an annual report on Choice Advice, this can be found at www.devon.gov.uk/laf-cy-08-21.pdf
There are six Choice Advisers who work part time in Devon and their total hours add up to one full time equivalent post.
So far 245 families have been supported, with a focus on the transfer from year 6 to year 7. Advice and support for parents, particularly those of children with Special Educational Needs, is available from a range of sources including:
• Choice Advisers
• parent partnerships
• parent support advisers
• educational psychologists
• support and advisory teachers
• Portage services
• schools
• health professionals
• Joint Agency Team workers
• national support groups.
LAF recommendations
1. Choice Advice should be offered individually to foster carers and others responsible for Children in Care, especially for in-year admissions, as well as for the transition from primary to secondary school.
2. Consideration should be given to further prioritising Choice Advice to the areas of potential need for children from different ethnic and social background, and those who fail to complete application forms.
3. The LAF should see evidence of the effect of the extension of the Choice Advice service through Parenting Support in schools, as schools increasingly offer extended services.
4. The report of research into Choice Advice by Sheffield Hallam University for the DCSF published in 2008, should be considered by LAF.
5. Consideration should be given to more joined-up working between Choice Advisers and Devon Parent Partnership in supporting the families of children with Special Educational Needs.
Page 37
10 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
Appeals
Appeals for the 2007/08 admissions round.
Appealsheard
Appealsallowed
Percent of heard appeals which were allowed
Primary community and voluntary controlled schools
114 20 17.5%
Secondary community and voluntary controlled schools
157 46 29.3%
Appeals for the 2006/07 admissions round.
Appealsheard
Appealsallowed
Percent of heard appeals which were allowed
PrimaryCommunity and voluntary controlled schools
153 33 21.6
Voluntary aided 11 3 27.3
SecondaryCommunity and voluntary controlled schools
75 21 28
Voluntary aided 29 1 3.5
Average appeals for the 2006/07 admissions round for England.
• Primary - 32.2% of appeals were successful.
• Secondary - 35.3% of appeals were successful.
Information available at www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000789/index.shtml
Page 38
Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008 11
Ethnic and social mix
Social mixEligibility for free school meals (FSM) as a proxy indicator of social mix.
Area Percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals
Exeter 14.1% Highest level of social mix
North Devon 11.4% Second highest level of social mix
East Devon 6.8% Lowest level of social mix
This data analysed further by Local Learning Community.
Area Percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals
Top Exe, Exeter 15.7% Highest level of social mix
Ottery St Mary, East Devon 3.7% Lowest level of social mix
This information is available at www.devon.gov.uk/index/learning/educationstatistics
Ethnic mix
White Mixed Asian/Asian British
Black/Black British Chinese Other
Primary 50118 711 250 70 99 281
WhiteBritish
48809
Secondary 41171 464 99 59 70 145
WhiteBritish
40496
Page 39
12 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
Ethnic minority pupils
• Primary - 5.2% of pupils come from ethnic minority backgrounds
• Secondary - 3.5% of pupils come from ethnic minority backgrounds
The highest percentage is 8.5% in Exeter and the lowest is 2.8% in Torridge.
The Local Learning Community with the highest percentage is Exeter Central with 11.3%, and the lowest is 1.9% in Teign.
There are some groups where specific locations stand out.
Total number of people Area
Afghan 29 28 in Exeter
Arab 85 66 in Exeter
Gypsy or Roma 50 20 in East Devon
Indian 149 78 in Exeter 24 in North Devon
Bangladeshi 109 47 in Exeter 29 in North Devon
Vulnerable childrenAll schools have criteria which allow for a child to have exceptional priority on social or medical grounds. However, it is not always clear what the criteria might be, or whether the local authority criteria laid out in page 8 of The Next Step booklet applies to all schools. The First Step booklet does not contain any guidance on criteria. This will be addressed so that parents are given clearer advice in this area and schools will be supported more fully.
LAF recommendations
1. Guidance on criteria for vulnerable children, along the lines of that in The Next Step, should be included in criteria for all schools and the responsibility for admissions decisions is clear in all cases.
2. LAF should be informed annually of numbers admitted using this criterion.
3. All schools be strongly encouraged to make sure their prospectuses refer to accessibility and disability equality in a positive light.
Page 40
Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008 13
Children in Care All Devon schools, whatever the admission authority, have Children in Care as top priority. This includes schools which legitimately have other criteria which must also be met; such as academic or faith criteria.
Statement of Special Educational Needs (SEN)All schools have pupils with SEN, but 36 primary schools have no pupils with statements of SEN. Thirty of these are schools which have fewer than 100 pupils. Data is correct at spring 2008.
Primary schools with over 100 pupils, but no pupils with statements of SEN
Name of school Type of school Number of pupils Number of pupils with SEN
Instow Community 144 30
Denbury Community 111 12
Bolham Community 107 5
St Rumon’s Tavistock Voluntary controlled 143 30
St Helen’s Abbotsham Voluntary controlled 145 21
Beer Voluntary aided 102 17
Monitoring the In Year Admissions Policy
The LAF will monitor how the In Year, or Casual, Admissions Policy is applied for primary and secondary schools, and will consider any evidence brought to it which may show that parents and children have been put off applying to their prefered schools.
As the most difficult area, the admission of in year students to year 11 has its own protocol.
Dowries exist to support the admission of excluded pupils.
LAF recommendations
1. The LAF should gather information on parents withdrawing children from school in-year, including withdrawals in the Managed Moves Protocol, and monitor and review the reasons for these withdrawals.
2. The LAF should consider the possibility of having dowries for all in year admissions.
Page 41
14 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
Infant class size
At the census date in January 2008, there were two oversize Key Stage 1 classes and three oversize Reception classes.
Admission appealsAppeals panels receive clear information on their limited discretion, when class size features in an appeal.
Appeals related to infant class size in community and voluntary controlled primary schools
Admissions round Appeals heard Appeals allowed
2006/07 50 19
2007/08 51 4
LAF recommendations
1. The LAF should receive information on oversize infant classes after the census date.
Page 42
Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008 15
Online applications
The number of online applications in Devon is amongst the highest in the South West region.
In the 2007/08 admissions round:
• 68.1% of secondary school applications were completed online
• 76.3% of primary school applications were completed online.
Compliance
In summer 2008 Devon County Council took part in a compliance exercise with the Schools Adjudicator. This helped to provide legal scrutiny of the proposed arrangements for 2009/10. It has resulted in changes to individual schools’ admission arrangements being required from some schools and useful wording for a section of Devon County Council’s booklets, The First Step and The Next Step.
Since summer 2007, Devon County Council has had one objection to its admissions arrangements. This was from Hatherleigh Community Primary School and was against the PAN. The objection was not upheld.
Devon County Council has referred a case to the Schools Adjudicator. The case objected to the arrangements of Woodroffe School in Dorset which was including Hawkchurch Church of England Primary School in Devon as a feeder school. The objection was upheld.
Further cases relating to Bickleigh Down Church of England Primary School and The Clinton Church of England Primary School, which are both voluntary aided schools, have been upheld in Devon County Council’s favour.
In 2007/08 there have been no objections by the Devon County COuncil which have needed intervention by the Secretary of State or references to the Courts.
Sixteen cases have been referred by parents or governing bodies to the Local Government Ombudsman. One of these cases was settled locally. No case has resulted in a finding of maladministration against Devon County Council.
There were seven cases referred by parents or governing bodies to the Local Government Ombudsman in 2007.
Other issues
Page 43
16 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
Designated areas
There has been no change to designated areas since the major reorganisation of Exeter secondary schools in 2005, except minor amendments to gain consistency when the mapping was digitised.
Through joint working between Devon County Council and Exeter Diocese, and following the compliance exercise with the Schools Adjudicator, further mapping is being developed to clarify other boundaries, such as parishes, mentioned in voluntary aided schools’ admission criteria.
Distance criterion
All school admission authorities use the straight line measurement. This is the measurement from the child’s home to the school and is used to determine priority between children when a school is over-subscribed. it is not the same as the measurement for school transport eligibility, but we are not aware of any difficulties arising directly from this.
Special arrangements
The only special arrangements for a specific group are those in place for Travellers. The Traveller Education Service organises links directly with relevant schools.
Dissuasion from application
The Forum is not aware of any issues relating to the illegal practice of schools requesting money as part of the application process.
LAF recommendation
1. The LAF should research costs of school uniform and kit in all schools, with any procedures for help with costs as necessary.
Page 44
Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008 17
Transport policy
The changes to School Transport Policy have, so far, had no discernible effect on the admissions process.
Guidance and information for parents
The mention of boarding places at Queen Elizabeth’s Community College, Crediton on page 47 of The Next Step is not cross-referenced to the detail on page 16 about admission to these places.
LAF recommendation
1. The paragraph on page 16 should be moved to page 47, with a clear indication of whether boarding applications are invited in The Next Step process.
The Next Step has a page giving figures for the previous year’s round of applications. This is to help parents to assess the likely demand for places at a given school in the next round of applications and assess their own prospects of success.
Effort has been made to make the guidance in The First Step and The Next Step accessible to parents. There are some examples of inconsistency and repetition as information has been written by different admitting authorities.
LAF recommendations
1. Primary schools are described as feeder schools on page 6 of The Next Step and are called contributory schools elsewhere. One term should be used through the booklet.
2. To avoid confusion, primary schools which are described as part contributory should insteadhave the relevant designated area made clear.
3. The LAF should work with the Devon County Council Plain English and Easy Read Project to make admissions documents more accessible.
Page 45
18 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
Find more information through these links.
The First Stepwww.devon.gov.uk/firststep0910.pdf
The Next Stepwww.devon.gov.uk/nextstep09
Data from the last admissions roundwww.devon.gov.uk/nxt09-whathappendin2008.pdf
Admissions and transfers informationwww.devon.gov.uk/admissions
Choice Adviser update to Devon LAF 27 March 2008www.devon.gov.uk/laf-cy-08-21.pdf
Education statistics for Devon County Councilwww.devon.gov.uk/educationstatistics
Admission appeals for maintained primary and secondary schools in England, 2006/2007 – information from DCSFwww.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000789/index.shtml
More information
Page 46
Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008 19
Notes
Page 47
20 Local Admissions Forum annual report 2008
November 2008
Design and editing by CYPS publications 01392 383698Page 48
Admissions Forum
Annual Report October 2008
Status: Agreed Report
Page 49
Wiltshire Admission Forum Annual Report October 2008 1. Introduction Section 85A(1A) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 (as inserted by section 41(3) of the Education and Inspections Act 2006) provides admission forums with an important power to produce an annual report on school admissions. Regulation 4 of the Education (Admissions Forums) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2007 sets out what as a minimum must be included in such reports. This report is provided to satisfy these statutory requirements. 2. Scope The purpose of the report is to:
• enable the Admission Forum to discharge its responsibility to ensure that admission arrangements and other school policies are fair and do not disadvantage either directly or indirectly a child from a particular social or racial group or a child with a disability or special educational needs.
• help the Local Authority to exercise its statutory duty to promote fair access and to help it identify any local issues.
• enable schools to comply with their fair access duty and to ensure that their admission arrangements are lawful and fair.
The report will be forwarded to the School Commissioner to inform his report to Parliament on Fair Access. 3. Preferences met
a. Secondary Intake for September 2008 The table at Appendix A indicates the number of preferences met for the intake year. The data includes only children who are the responsibility of Wiltshire CC i.e. those living within the county at the time of their application. Some of the listed schools take in children who are not Wiltshire residents. Once a preference has been met any further preferences are declined and so do not show up in the table. For instance, the second preferences met are for children who could not be offered their first preference school. Secondary applications are co-ordinated across local authority boundaries and the Admissions Forum is pleased to report that this system seems to be working well. As it becomes the “usual practice” parents seem to be happy with making their application to their home authority even though they may be applying for an out of county school. Overall 88.9% of first preferences were met with 96% of applicants receiving an offer at one of their preferred schools. Nine Wiltshire schools could not offer a place to everyone who named it as first preference. Of these nine, 2 are Grammar Schools, 3 are Foundation Schools, 2 are RC Aided schools and 2 are Community Schools. Appellants for Trafalgar School at Downton indicated their reason for applying for this school was that they were dissatisfied with the alternative provision in East
Page 50
Salisbury, particularly for boys. Parental perception is that currently there are limited realistic options available in Salisbury for those pupils not passing the 11+. Measures to improve the provision at Wyvern College are in place and WCC has expressed an interest in forming an academy at the Laverstock campus. The forum welcomes these moves. Two of the foundation schools were in Chippenham; the effect of the removing of the first preference first arrangement and the continued popularity of both Sheldon and Hardenhuish account for this. Both these schools give priority in their admission arrangements to children living or educated in rural villages around Chippenham and as a result many of those who were refused places lived within the urban area of Chippenham. The alternative of Abbeyfield is seen as geographically difficult to walk to from West Chippenham, although it is within limits for walking distance and many pupils do not qualify for transport. Both Chippenham and Salisbury areas accounted for the majority of enquiries from Parents received by the Choice Advice Service. Talks are continuing between WCC and the schools to discuss how more local children can be offered a preferred school. The forum welcomes and supports this move. The table at Appendix B indicates the number of Year 6 children from each primary school who were offered their first, second and third preference secondary school. It also shows the number of children who were allocated a place because none of their preferences could be met. This table is ordered so that the schools where children had most difficulty in getting their preferences are at the top. At the bottom of the table are the schools where all children were offered their first preference secondary school. Four of the eight schools at the top of the list are in Chippenham – again showing that children from Chippenham town were less likely to be offered their preferred secondary school. Lower down the table it can be seen that for many children, moving to secondary school is more straightforward, and from many schools the natural progression to the “local” secondary school means that in effect parents opt for a school which is the designated secondary school.
b. Reception Intake The table at Appendix C indicates the number of preferences met for the intake year at primary and infant schools. The data includes only children who are the responsibility of Wiltshire CC i.e. those living within the county at the time of their application. Some of the listed schools take in children who are not Wiltshire residents. Once a preference has been met, any further preferences are declined and so do not show up in the table. For instance, the second preferences met are for children who could not be offered their first preference school. Primary applications are not (yet) co-ordinated across local authority boundaries. The Admission Forum is happy to report that co-ordination within Wiltshire is working well although it recognises the extra work that has been placed on individual admission authorities in the aided and foundation schools. In spite of this the principle of co-ordination, which helps parents, is fully supported by the Forum. Coordination and a common closing date for applications can also result in some difficulties in schools that have a lot of pupil movement after those dates, and this is especially so in some schools with a high “forces “element.
Page 51
Overall 93.4% of applicants were offered their first preference school and 97% of applicants were offered one of their three preferences. For many rural primary schools there is no reasonable alternative and places are offered to all in area children. The Forum recognises the pressure this can put on some small schools. The popularity of some schools is affected greatly by the results of the latest OfSTED report. Easton Royal is a small school with a PAN of 8. It had an excellent grading was only able to offer 68% of first preferences and out of area children were refused. There is no distinct pattern found when comparing VA&F schools with VC&C schools. Some schools in each status category cannot offer 100% of first preferences whilst the majority in all status groups do.
c. Junior Intake
Junior applications are not (yet) co-ordinated across local authority boundaries. The Admission Forum is happy to report that co-ordination within Wiltshire is working well although it recognises the extra work that has been placed on individual admission authorities in the aided and foundation schools. In spite of this the principle of co-ordination which helps parents is fully supported by the Forum. All parents who named a Junior school as their first preference were offered a place. The natural progression from the linked infant school works well for parents in this regard. Some parents chose not to send their children to the linked junior school once they had completed their time in an infant school. Again 100% were offered their first preference school in Wiltshire.
The Admissions Forum is pleased to report that there is no evidence that parents are experiencing undue difficulties in understanding the application process. Those that may have any queries about the process are contacting, or being signposted to, the Choice Advice Service for advice and guidance prior to completing their application. 4. Online Applications The following table indicates the number of applications received online
This table gives results of the customer satisfaction report generated by the online system
Category Very Clear Clear Unclear Very Unclear Number 1265 575 15 5
% 67.8% 30.8% 1.02% 0.27%
Sector Primary Secondary Number 2164 1745 Percentage 43% 34%
Page 52
The number of online applications has shown an increase on 2006. A total of 39% of applications from Wiltshire residents were received online in 2007 and in 2006 this figure was 25%. All those who reported the system as being very unclear were contacted and in over half the cases it was found that they had no complaint they wished to pursue. There is a high level of satisfaction with the system as reported by users. Improvements to the software have been undertaken by its suppliers for the system for 2009 intakes. The Forum will continue to receive reports as to how the online system is operating. There has been no reported saving of staff time in handling admissions online. Each application still has to be verified and authenticated, although there is a decrease in the time taken for inputting applications, overall there has been no time saved. 5. Appeals This table indicates the number of appeals lodged and heard for 2008 intake year groups and shows the number of successful appeals which were allowed.
Lodged Settled Heard Allowed National Averages Primary Appeals
68%
36%
VC&C Primary Schools
105 15 67 (64%)
21 (31%)
VA&F Primary Schools
13 0 13 (100%)
6 (46%)
National Averages ICS appeals
60%
20%
VC&C Primary Schools ICS
55 8 38 (76%)
3 (8%)
VA&F Primary Schools ICS
0 0 0 0
National Averages Secondary Appeals
74%
36%
VC&C secondary schools
49
6
41
(84%)
11
(27%) VA&F secondary schools
158
34
95
(60%)
61
(64%) There has been an increase in the number of appeals for Voluntary Controlled and Community Schools. Also many smaller Voluntary Aided and Foundation primary schools have received appeals for the first time. Appeals are almost always from out of area children since in Wiltshire we maintain as much as possible a policy of offering places at local schools. In rural areas this policy often means schools take over PAN to accommodate their in-area children. Overall the figures given above for Wiltshire VC & C schools do not show a significant departure from the national averages. The percentage of VA&F Secondary Appeals allowed
Page 53
was 28% over the National Average – this dispels a myth that it is difficult for parents to be successful at appeals at VA&F schools. . The Admissions Forum is concerned about the burden being placed on VA&F schools which are required to run appeals especially in light of the revised regulations which require training for both clerks and appeal panel members. 6. Social and Ethnic Mix of children attending Schools The figures given in Appendix D were obtained from the Research and Stats team and refer to 2007/8 intakes. The columns headed FSM eligible indicate the number and percentage of the intake who were eligible to apply for a free school meal. The columns headed Known BME give the number and percentage of the intake who were recorded as being black or minority ethnic children. The average percentage for FSM eligibility was 5.7%, the average percentage of BME children was 7.3%. Appendix E gives the similar statistics for Year 6 children in 2007. These children were the ones who applied for secondary places for September 2008 – which are referred to in Appendix A. The figures from Appendix B have been added to this table and so a comparison of the background data compared with the percentage of preferences met can be undertaken. There is no statistical correlation between any of the compared figures. 7. Looked After Children The figures given in Appendix D were obtained from the Research and Stats team and refer to 2007/8 intakes. The numbers and percentages of looked after children are given in the columns headed In Care Jan 08. The average percentage of looked after children in the intake year was 1.3%. Appendix E gives the similar statistics for Year 6 children in 2007. These children were the ones who applied for secondary places for September 2008 – which are referred to in Appendix A. The figures from Appendix B have been added to this table and so a comparison of the background data compared with the percentage of preferences met can be undertaken. There is no statistical correlation between any of the compared figures. 8. Children with SEN The figures given in Appendix D were obtained from the Research and Stats team and refer to 2007/8 intakes. The columns headed SEN indicate the numbers and percentages of the intake years of children who were at a particular stage on the SEN spectrum – which goes going from ‘school action’ to full statement. The columns headed SEN with statement indicate the numbers and percentages of children within the intake who had a statement of educational need. As might be expected these numbers are quite low. Few four year olds have a full statement and few statements carry over into the Year 7 intake from primary schools. The average percentage of children with SEN was 0.3% Appendix E gives the similar statistics for Year 6 children in 2007. These children were the ones who applied for secondary places for September 2008 – which are referred to in Appendix A. The figures from Appendix B have been added to this table and so a comparison of the background data compared with the percentage of preferences met can be undertaken. There is no statistical correlation between any of the compared figures. 9. Fair Access Protocol
Page 54
The FAP was introduced for the first time in September 2007. Since that time further discussions between the Local Authority and the Secondary and Primary Heads Forums have been undertaken. Since the FAP relies on a collaborative approach with schools working in cluster groups to address the issue of children not being in school, this work is being undertaken by the Behaviour and Attendance Group of Schools Branch (led by Mark Brotherton). The main thrust of the recent discussions has been to clarify when and who will apply the FAP so that the time out of school is contained to a minimum for any young person. There is little evidence to hand on the success or failure of the FAP within Wiltshire schools. The Forum has been made aware of a particular issue with Year 10 in Chippenham secondary schools but understands that this matter has been resolved and all children now have a school place for September 2008. The Forum appreciates the work being done by members of the School Admissions Team and Educational Welfare Officers in trying to keep the number of children out of school to a minimum. Keeping children out of school for as short a time as possible must be the aim of this close partnership working. The Forum requests a report of the workings of the FAP should become a generic agenda item at all its meetings from September 2008 onwards. 10. Infant Class Size There are no schools in Wiltshire who are operating outside the regulations in regard to Infant Class Sizes. The Forum understands that reports are made on a termly basis to the School Admissions Team who challenge any school with classes over the limit of 30. The monitoring exercise is undertaken to ensure that all exceptions are permitted under the ICS regulations. There is an issue, not uncommon in rural authorities, that some Infant Classes are inevitably going to be over the legal maximum because some children do not have a reasonable alternative school to attend. In these more isolated rural schools the distance to the next school is such that it is an unsafe walking distance and in these circumstances some children do become permitted exceptions to the ICS regulations. The Forum understands that the issue of admitting over PAN in rural schools is being considered by the Schools Branch Leadership team in September 2008 and will anticipate a follow up report early in 2009. 11. Admission Arrangements The Forum notes that the Schools Adjudicator has reviewed the admission arrangements of a sample of all schools across England. It understands that a sample of some 25% have been examined in detail by a legal team. The Forum is concerned that some Voluntary Aided and Foundation schools in Wiltshire fail to consult and determine their admission arrangements within the statutory deadlines. Whilst many schools do not make use of their oversubscription criteria since they are not oversubscribed, it is still a statutory requirement for admission arrangements to be drafted, consulted on and then determined by 15 April in any year. The Forum receives regular updates on the consultations undertaken regarding admission arrangements between VA&F schools and the Local Authority and fully supports the LA in ensuring that all arrangements comply with the School Admissions Code of Practice. The Forum is aware that it is the Local Authority’s view that no schools now have illegal arrangements and all do comply with the appropriate Code. Nonetheless the Forum requests that the LA is vigilant in responding to all consultations it receives to ensure that this situation continues and enlists the assistance of the Choice Advice Service with this annual task.
Page 55
12. Choice Advisory Service The Forum is pleased to hear that the Choice Advice Service as commissioned by the Local Authority from ask– the Family Information Service based in Steeple Ashton, is working well. The Forum has welcomed the two Choice Advisers as non core members since July 2008. Regular reports should be given at all Forum meetings as a standing agenda item. The Forum appreciates the materials being produced by ask and recognises that good work is being done in attending secondary school open evenings and answering parental enquiries. The Choice Advisers are continuing to work to ensure that the number of late applications received after the deadline falls because it is clear that if parents apply before the deadline their chances of having their preferences met are far greater. The Choice Advisers are continuing to investigate ways of making their service available to more people and to reaching the less advantaged children and parents across the county. The Choice Advisers report this breakdown in the cases they have tackled.
% Cases in Kennet 14.3 North Wilts 29.5 South Wilts 29.5 West Wilts 16.1 Out County 10.7
Of the cases tackled, 29.5 % have involved discussions about out of county schools. 22.3% have involved pupils with SEN and 5% children in receipt of free school meals.
Page 56
13. Recommendations
• The Forum requests a follow up report from the discussions on admitting over PAN in rural primary schools (Jan 2009).
• The Forum requests that a report on the operation of the Fair Access Protocol should
be a standing item on its agenda for all future meetings (Sept 2008 onwards).
• The Forum urges the Local Authority to be vigilant in checking the admission arrangements of all maintained schools in Wiltshire on an annual basis with assistance from the Choice Advice Service.
• The Forum requests that a report from the Choice Advisers should be a standing
item on the agenda of all meetings (Sept 2008 onwards).
• The Forum requests that any comments from the Schools Adjudicator be reported back to The Forum for discussion
Page 57
Appendix A
Secondary Intake 2008
Preference School PAN First Pref Second Pref Third Pref
Allocated Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Abbeyfield School 180 109 109 100.00% 8 8 100.00% 6 6 100.00% 29 Avon Valley College 185 124 124 100.00% 10 10 100.00% 1 Bishop Wordsworth's CE GS 120 239 99 41.40% 5 2 40.00% Bradon Forest School 252 90 90 100.00% Castledown Foundation School 132 115 115 100.00% 4 4 100.00% 2 Devizes School 223 198 198 100.00% 5 5 100.00% 2 Hardenhuish School 234 303 247 81.50% 36 3 8.30% 3 0 0.00% Lavington School 137 141 136 96.50% 9 7 77.80% Malmesbury School 228 188 188 100.00% 5 5 100.00% 2 Matravers School 196 190 190 100.00% 1 1 100.00% 2 Pewsey Vale 107 52 52 100.00% 2 2 100.00% Salisbury High School 208 115 115 100.00% 24 24 100.00% 4 4 100.00% 4 Sheldon School 280 338 258 76.30% 42 24 57.10% 3 0 0.00% South Wilts Grammar School for Girls 128 253 92 36.40% 6 1 16.70% St Augustine's RC College, Trowbridge 150 151 122 80.80% 5 0 0.00% St Edmund's CE Girls' School, Salis 168 90 90 100.00% 53 53 100.00% 5 St John's School, Marlborough 246 232 232 100.00% 4 4 100.00% 1 1 100.00% St Joseph's Catholic School, Salisbury 75 83 62 74.70% 34 16 47.10% 3 1 33.30% St Laurence School 217 193 193 100.00% 3 3 100.00% 3 The Clarendon College, Trowbridge 261 225 225 100.00% 3 3 100.00% 2 The Corsham School 230 230 226 98.30% 3 2 66.70% 5 2 40.00% The George Ward School 258 191 191 100.00% 5 The John Bentley School 235 213 213 100.00% 7 7 100.00% 2 2 100.00% 11 The John of Gaunt School, Trowbridge 280 205 205 100.00% 8 8 100.00% The Stonehenge School 164 127 127 100.00% 16 16 100.00% 4 4 100.00% The Trafalgar School at Downton 90 95 77 81.10% 42 29 69.00% 10 5 50.00% Warminster Kingdown 260 229 229 100.00% 7 7 100.00% 4 4 100.00% 4 Wootton Bassett School 260 224 224 100.00% Wyvern College 150 45 45 100.00% 18 18 100.00% 10 10 100.00% 20
Totals for Wiltshire Schools 4988 4988 4474 89.70% 360 262 72.80% 55 39 70.90% 92
Non Wiltshire Schools Gillingham School 59 49 83.10% 13 2 15.40% Shaftesbury School and Spts College 34 34 100.00% 8 0 0.00% 3 3 100.00% Cirencester Kingshill School 33 32 97.00% 1 0 0.00% Test Valley School 30 12 40.00% 20 6 30.00% 2 0 0.00% The Burgate School 26 17 65.40% 32 15 46.90% 6 1 16.70% Farmor's School 16 16 100.00% 2 1 50.00% Cirencester Deer Park 13 11 84.60% Saint Gregory's Catholic College 10 7 70.00% 1 0 0.00% 1 0 0.00% St Joseph's Catholic College, Swindon 6 5 83.30% 1 0 0.00% Stroud High School 6 1 16.70% 1 1 100.00% Harrow Way Community School 5 5 100.00% 2 2 100.00% John Hanson Community School 5 1 20.00% 2 1 50.00% Pate's Grammar School 5 3 60.00% Ralph Allen School 5 0 0.00% John O'Gaunt Comm Tech College 4 4 100.00% St Bartholomew's School 4 2 50.00% King Arthur's Community School 3 3 100.00% Beechen Cliff School 2 1 50.00% 2 0 0.00% The Clere School 2 2 100.00% 3 0 0.00% The Mountbatten School 2 1 50.00% The Ridgeway School 2 2 100.00% The Romsey School 2 1 50.00% 2 1 50.00% The Westgate School 2 0 0.00% 1 0 0.00% Ansford Community School 1 1 100.00% Colyton Grammar School 1 1 100.00% Hayesfield School Technology College 1 1 100.00% Kings' School 1 0 0.00% 1 0 0.00% 1 0 0.00%
Page 58
Preference School PAN First Pref Second Pref Third Pref
Allocated Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Malvern, The Chase 1 0 0.00% Reading School 1 1 100.00% Regents Park Community College 1 0 0.00% The Castle School 1 0 0.00% The King's School, Grantham 1 1 100.00% Three Ways School 1 1 100.00% Winton School 1 1 100.00% Bishop Challoner Secondary School 1 1 100.00% Henry Beaufort School 1 1 100.00% 1 1 100.00% Holyrood Community School 1 1 100.00% Marling School 1 1 100.00% Park House School and Spts College 1 1 100.00% Testbourne Community School 1 0 0.00% The Commonweal School 1 0 0.00%
Overall Totals 5275 4690 88.90% 456 296 64.90% 72 44 61.10% 92
Page 59
Appendix B Secondary Intake from each Wiltshire Primary School
School Pref 1 Pref 2 Pref 3 NoPref
No % No % No % NoPref %
Queen's Crescent, Chippenham 41 74.5% 7 12.7% 7 12.7%
Harnham CE VC Junior 57 68.7% 16 19.3% 3 3.6% 7 8.4%
Charter Primary , Chippenham 43 79.6% 5 9.3% 6 11.1%
King's Lodge Community, Chippenham 52 83.9% 2 3.2% 2 3.2% 6 9.7%
Bowerhill Primary 54 91.5% 1 1.7% 4 6.8%
St Mark's CE Junior 63 69.2% 19 20.9% 5 5.5% 4 4.4%
Semley CE VA Primary 3 33.3% 2 22.2% 1 11.1% 3 33.3%
Ivy Lane Primary, Chippenham 46 88.5% 1 1.9% 2 3.8% 3 5.8%
Fynamore Primary 48 87.3% 2 3.6% 2 3.6% 3 5.5%
Pitton CE (VA) Primary 8 66.7% 2 16.7% 2 16.7%
Stratford-sub-Castle CE VC Primary 9 52.9% 6 35.3% 2 11.8%
Winterslow CE VA Primary 15 68.2% 5 22.7% 2 9.1%
Greentrees Primary 18 72.0% 5 20.0% 2 8.0%
Holy Trinity CE , Calne 21 84.0% 2 8.0% 2 8.0%
St George's Catholic Primary , Warminster 24 82.8% 1 3.4% 2 6.9% 2 6.9%
St Osmund's Catholic Primary 14 48.3% 12 41.4% 1 3.4% 2 6.9%
St Patrick's Catholic Primary 27 90.0% 1 3.3% 2 6.7%
Bradford on Avon Christ Church 58 96.7% 2 3.3%
Landford CE Primary 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0%
Bulford Kiwi 7 77.8% 1 11.1% 1 11.1%
Wardour Catholic Primary 7 70.0% 2 20.0% 1 10.0%
Heytesbury CE Primary 11 91.7% 1 8.3%
Dinton CE VC Primary 10 76.9% 2 15.4% 1 7.7%
St John's CE Primary 13 92.9% 1 7.1%
Hilmarton Primary 12 80.0% 2 13.3% 1 6.7%
Langley Fitzurse CE Primary 14 93.3% 1 6.7%
Bemerton St John CE VA Primary 11 64.7% 5 29.4% 1 5.9%
St Martin's CE (VA) Primary 12 60.0% 5 25.0% 2 10.0% 1 5.0%
Broad Chalke CE VA Primary 13 59.1% 7 31.8% 1 4.5% 1 4.5%
Neston Primary 21 95.5% 1 4.5%
Priestley Primary 21 95.5% 1 4.5%
Box CE Primary 21 91.3% 1 4.3% 1 4.3%
Sarum St Paul's CE VA Primary 14 58.3% 9 37.5% 1 4.2%
Pembroke Park Primary 18 69.2% 7 26.9% 1 3.8%
Wilton and Barford CE Primary 20 76.9% 5 19.2% 1 3.8%
Bishops Cannings CE (VA) Primary 26 92.9% 1 3.6% 1 3.6%
New Close Community 27 96.4% 1 3.6%
Saint Edmund's R C Primary 25 89.3% 2 7.1% 1 3.6%
St Andrew's CE VA Primary 21 70.0% 7 23.3% 1 3.3% 1 3.3%
St Mary's R.C. Primary , Chippenham 28 93.3% 1 3.3% 1 3.3%
Wansdyke Community 28 93.3% 1 3.3% 1 3.3%
Fitzmaurice Primary 30 96.8% 1 3.2%
Salisbury Highbury Primary 37 90.2% 3 7.3% 1 2.4%
Westbury Leigh CE Primary 51 98.1% 1 1.9%
Frogwell Primary, Chippenham 51 94.4% 2 3.7% 1 1.9%
Aloeric Primary 55 98.2% 1 1.8%
Page 60
School Pref 1 Pref 2 Pref 3 NoPref
No % No % No % NoPref %
St Dunstan CE Primary 58 98.3% 1 1.7%
Westbury CE Junior 69 98.6% 1 1.4%
Corsham Primary 77 98.7% 1 1.3%
Winterbourne Earls CE Primary 13 65.0% 4 20.0% 3 15.0%
Chapmanslade CE VA Primary 6 85.7% 1 14.3%
Chilmark & Fonthill Bishop CE VA Primary 7 70.0% 2 20.0% 1 10.0%
Alderbury & West Grimstead CE Primary 19 65.5% 8 27.6% 2 6.9%
Gomeldon Primary 11 61.1% 6 33.3% 1 5.6%
Woodford Valley CE (VA) 15 71.4% 5 23.8% 1 4.8%
Cherhill CE Primary 25 89.3% 2 7.1% 1 3.6%
The Minster CE Primary 28 93.3% 1 3.3% 1 3.3%
Colerne CE Primary 34 97.1% 1 2.9%
Downton CE (Voulntary VA) Primary 27 71.1% 10 26.3% 1 2.6%
St Peter's CE Primary , Chippenham 36 90.0% 3 7.5% 1 2.5%
Clarendon Junior , Tidworth 65 95.6% 2 2.9% 1 1.5%
Hindon CE VA Primary 3 60.0% 2 40.0%
Great Wishford CE (VA) Primary 13 68.4% 6 31.6%
Monkton Park Community Primary 21 70.0% 9 30.0%
Coombe Bissett CE Primary 5 71.4% 2 28.6%
Chilton Foliat CE VA Primary 3 75.0% 1 25.0%
Crudwell CE Primary 11 78.6% 3 21.4%
Britford CE VC Primary 4 80.0% 1 20.0%
Southwick CE Primary 14 82.4% 3 17.6%
Odstock Primary 5 83.3% 1 16.7%
Keevil CE VA Primary 11 84.6% 2 15.4%
Morgan's Vale and Woodfalls CE VA Primary 11 84.6% 2 15.4%
Broad Hinton CE Primary 6 85.7% 1 14.3%
All Saints VA CE Primary , Netheravon 13 86.7% 2 13.3%
Amesbury CE VC Primary 43 87.8% 6 12.2%
Figheldean St Michael's CE Primary 8 88.9% 1 11.1%
Rushall CE VA 8 88.9% 1 11.1%
St Thomas a Becket CE VA 8 88.9% 1 11.1%
Woodborough CE (VA) Primary 17 89.5% 2 10.5%
Dilton Marsh CE Primary 18 90.0% 2 10.0%
Whiteparish All Saints CE VA Primary 9 90.0% 1 10.0%
Woodlands Primary 27 90.0% 3 10.0%
Durrington CE VC Junior 48 90.6% 5 9.4%
Pewsey Primary 20 90.9% 2 9.1%
Amesbury Archer Primary 21 91.3% 2 8.7%
Crockerton CE VA Primary 11 91.7% 1 8.3%
Idmiston CE VA Primary 11 91.7% 1 8.3%
Christ The King Catholic Amesbury 34 91.9% 3 8.1%
Castle Primary , Ludgershall 27 93.1% 2 6.9%
St Joseph's Catholic Primary Malmesbury 14 93.3% 1 6.7%
St Joseph's Catholic Primary Devizes 29 93.5% 2 6.5%
Shrewton CE Primary 15 93.8% 1 6.3%
Dauntsey's VA Primary 16 94.1% 1 5.9%
Bulford Primary CE VA 35 94.6% 2 5.4%
Staverton CE VC Primary 35 94.6% 2 5.4%
Bratton Primary 18 94.7% 1 5.3%
Page 61
School Pref 1 Pref 2 Pref 3 NoPref
No % No % No % NoPref %
St John's Catholic Trowbridge 40 95.2% 2 4.8%
Zouch Primary 20 95.2% 1 4.8%
Nursteed Community Primary 26 96.3% 1 3.7%
Sherston CE Primary 26 96.3% 1 3.7%
Shaw CE (VC) Primary 27 96.4% 1 3.6%
Derry Hill CE VA 29 96.7% 1 3.3%
Grove Primary 58 96.7% 2 3.3%
Rowde CE VA Primary 31 96.9% 1 3.1%
Bellefield Primary and Nursery 36 97.3% 1 2.7%
Paxcroft Primary 38 97.4% 1 2.6%
St Sampson's CE Junior 55 98.2% 1 1.8%
The Mead Community Primary 57 98.3% 1 1.7%
All Cannings CE Primary 12 100.0%
Ashton Keynes CE Primary 30 100.0%
Baydon St Nicholas CE 10 100.0%
Bitham Brook Primary 45 100.0%
Brinkworth Earl Danby's CE Primary 23 100.0%
Broad Town CE Primary 11 100.0%
Burbage Primary 21 100.0%
By Brook Valley CE Primary 16 100.0%
Chirton CE Primary 2 100.0%
Christian Malford CE Primary 19 100.0%
Churchfields, The Village 13 100.0%
Collingbourne CE Primary 7 100.0%
Corsham Regis Primary 30 100.0%
Easton Royal Community Primary 5 100.0%
Five Lanes Primary 14 100.0%
Forest & Sandridge CE Primary 28 100.0%
Grafton CE Primary 5 100.0%
Great Bedwyn CE Primary 20 100.0%
Great Cheverell, The Holy Trinity CE VA 16 100.0%
Heddington CE Primary 4 100.0%
Hilperton C.E.V.C. Primary 21 100.0%
Holbrook Primary 30 100.0%
Holt VC Primary 16 100.0%
Horningsham Primary 7 100.0%
Hullavington CE 15 100.0%
Kennet Valley (CE VA) Primary 19 100.0%
King's Park Primary , Melksham 1 100.0%
Kington St Michael CE Primary 17 100.0%
Lacock CE Primary 7 100.0%
Larkhill Primary 27 100.0%
Lea and Garsdon CE Primary 14 100.0%
Longleaze Primary 35 100.0%
Luckington Community 9 100.0%
Ludwell Community Primary 5 100.0%
Lydiard Millicent CE Primary 30 100.0%
Lyneham Primary 54 100.0%
Lypiatt Primary 1 100.0%
Malmesbury CE Primary 50 100.0%
Page 62
School Pref 1 Pref 2 Pref 3 NoPref
No % No % No % NoPref %
Mere 28 100.0%
Minety CE Primary 12 100.0%
Newton Tony CE VC Primary 3 100.0%
Newtown Community Primary 40 100.0%
Nomansland and Hamptworth CE VA Primary 9 100.0%
Noremarsh Junior Community 51 100.0%
North Bradley CE Primary 22 100.0%
Oaksey CE Primary 11 100.0%
Oare CE Primary 6 100.0%
Ogbourne St George & St Andrew VC Primary 12 100.0%
Preshute CE Primary 26 100.0%
Princecroft Primary 22 100.0%
Ramsbury 25 100.0%
Redland Community Primary 43 100.0%
Seagry CE Primary 3 100.0%
Seend CE VA Primary 12 100.0%
Shalbourne CE Primary 3 100.0%
Somerfords Walter Powell CE VA Primary 7 100.0%
Southbroom CE Junior 72 100.0%
St Barnabas CE , Market Lavington 22 100.0%
St Bartholomew's CE Primary (VA) 47 100.0%
St George's CE Primary , Semington 9 100.0%
St John's CE Primary, Warminster 11 100.0%
St Katharine's CE (VC) Primary 6 100.0%
St Mary's Broughton Gifford VC CE Primary 8 100.0%
St Mary's CE Primary , Purton 48 100.0%
St Michael's CE (VA) Primary , Aldbourne 14 100.0%
St Nicholas CE (V.C.) Primary Bromham 18 100.0%
St Paul's Primary 38 100.0%
St Peter's CE VA Primary , Devizes 16 100.0%
St Peter's Junior 50 100.0%
Stanton St Quintin Primary 14 100.0%
Studley Green Primary 32 100.0%
Sutton Benger CE VA Primary 21 100.0%
Sutton Veny CE (VC) 15 100.0%
The Avenue and Early Years Centre 32 100.0%
The Manor CE Primary 78 100.0%
Trowbridge Longmeadow Primary 25 100.0%
Upavon Primary 6 100.0%
Urchfont C.E. Primary 11 100.0%
Walwayne Court 40 100.0%
Warminster Sambourne CE (VC) Primary 23 100.0%
West Ashton CE VA Primary 11 100.0%
Westwood-with-Iford 15 100.0%
Whitesheet CE VA Primary 12 100.0%
Wingfield CE Primary 9 100.0%
Winsley CE VC Primary 20 100.0%
Wylye Valley 16 100.0%
4495 91.5% 286 5.8% 40 0.8% 92 1.9%
Page 63
Appendix C Reception Intake 2008
Preference PAN First Pref Second Pref Third Pref
Allocated Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Alderbury & West Grimstead CE 29 19 19 100.0% All Cannings CE 17 16 15 93.8% 2 2 100.0% All Saints CE VA Netheravon 30 29 28 96.6% 1 0 0.0% Aloeric 60 42 42 100.0% Amesbury Archer 25 57 29 50.9% 4 2 50.0% Amesbury CE VC 60 17 17 100.0% 7 7 100.0% 2 2 100.0% 5 Ashton Keynes CE 29 21 21 100.0% Baydon St Nicholas CE 17 11 11 100.0% Bellefield 60 32 32 100.0% 3 3 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 4 Bemerton St John CE VA 30 26 26 100.0% 1 Bishops Cannings CE (Aided) 30 32 30 93.8% Bitham Brook 42 43 39 90.7% 2 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% Bowerhill 54 43 43 100.0% Box CE 25 23 23 100.0% 1 0 0.0% Bradford on Avon Christ Church 60 55 55 100.0% Bratton 30 23 23 100.0% Brinkworth Earl Danby's CE 30 21 21 100.0% Britford CE VC 11 3 3 100.0% Broad Chalke CE Aided 25 34 29 85.3% 1 0 0.0% Broad Hinton CE 17 13 13 100.0% Broad Town CE 12 6 6 100.0% Bulford CE VA 33 31 31 100.0% 4 3 75.0% Burbage 29 20 20 100.0% By Brook Valley CE 21 20 20 100.0% 2 2 100.0% Castle, Ludgershall 56 28 28 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Chapmanslade CE VA 13 18 14 77.8% Charter 51 21 21 100.0% 1 Cherhill CE 30 24 24 100.0% 4 4 100.0% Chilmark & Fonthill Bishop CE VA 15 16 16 100.0% Chilton Foliat CE VA 19 3 3 100.0% Chirton CE 8 5 5 100.0% Christ The King RC Amesbury 38 40 36 90.0% 6 1 16.7% Christian Malford CE 12 14 11 78.6% Churchfields, The Village 20 14 14 100.0% 2 2 100.0% Clarendon Infants 90 72 72 100.0% 2 2 100.0% 1 Colerne CE 42 28 28 100.0% Collingbourne CE 17 15 15 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Coombe Bissett CE 10 17 15 88.2% 2 1 50.0% Corsham 90 110 81 73.6% 9 7 77.8% 1 0 0.0% 3 Corsham Regis 42 26 26 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 5 Crockerton CE VA 12 11 11 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Crudwell CE 17 11 11 100.0% Dauntsey's Aided 25 19 19 100.0% Derry Hill CE VA 30 31 29 93.5% 4 2 50.0% Devizes Southbroom Infants 90 50 50 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Dilton Marsh CE 25 18 18 100.0% 3 3 100.0% 2 Dinton CE VC 16 7 7 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Downton CE VA 30 23 23 100.0% Durrington All Saints 60 47 47 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 Easton Royal Community 8 16 11 68.8% Figheldean St Michael's CE 17 15 15 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Fitzmaurice 34 36 36 100.0% Five Lanes 25 11 11 100.0% Forest & Sandridge CE 28 27 27 100.0% Frogwell 60 36 36 100.0% 3 2 66.7% 2 2 100.0% 8 Fynamore 60 66 60 90.9% 3 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% Gomeldon 21 26 19 73.1% 2 1 50.0% 1 Grafton CE 7 8 8 100.0% Great Bedwyn CE 30 29 26 89.7% 1 1 100.0% Great Cheverell 19 15 15 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Great Wishford CE (Aided) 17 16 16 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
Page 64
Preference PAN First Pref Second Pref Third Pref
Allocated Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Greentrees 34 38 34 89.5% 1 0 0.0% Grove 60 77 60 77.9% 1 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% Harnham Infant 90 70 70 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Heddington CE 10 11 10 90.9% Heytesbury CE 14 8 8 100.0% Hilmarton 16 21 16 76.2% 1 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% Hilperton C.E.V.C. 21 13 13 100.0% 5 5 100.0% 2 Hindon CE VA 11 8 8 100.0% Holbrook 47 37 37 100.0% 2 2 100.0% 4 Holt VC 21 10 10 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Holy Trinity CE , Calne 30 25 25 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Horningsham 12 10 10 100.0% 2 0 0.0% Hullavington CE 25 25 25 100.0% Idmiston CE Aided 16 11 11 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Ivy Lane 60 37 36 97.3% 3 3 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 7 Keevil CE Aided 15 17 15 88.2% 1 1 100.0% Kennet Valley (CE Aided) 14 12 12 100.0% King's Lodge Community 60 53 53 100.0% 1 1 100.0% King's Park , Melksham 45 40 40 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Kington St Michael CE 17 15 15 100.0% 2 2 100.0% Kiwi 38 36 35 97.2% Lacock CE 12 18 18 100.0% Landford CE 8 7 7 100.0% Langley Fitzurse CE 15 18 14 77.8% 3 1 33.3% Larkhill 51 39 39 100.0% Lea and Garsdon CE 15 12 12 100.0% Longleaze 37 31 31 100.0% Luckington Community 8 5 5 100.0% 1 Ludwell Community 12 8 8 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Lydiard Millicent CE 30 25 24 96.0% Lyneham 60 59 59 100.0% Malmesbury CE 60 52 52 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Mere 30 33 33 100.0% Minety CE 20 18 18 100.0% Monkton Park Community 30 29 28 96.6% 2 2 100.0% 1 0 0.0% Morgan's Vale 17 12 12 100.0% Neston 21 25 21 84.0% 9 1 11.1% 1 1 New Close Community 29 27 26 96.3% Newton Tony CE VC 7 6 6 100.0% Newtown Community 43 20 20 100.0% 3 3 100.0% Nomansland and Hamptworth CE Aided 15 19 19 100.0% North Bradley CE 25 25 23 92.0% 5 5 100.0% Nursteed Community 30 20 20 100.0% 2 2 100.0% Oaksey CE 13 9 9 100.0% Oare CE 12 11 11 100.0% 2 2 100.0% Odstock 11 7 7 100.0% 2 1 50.0% Ogbourne St George 12 10 10 100.0% Paxcroft 38 43 36 83.7% 8 4 50.0% 1 1 100.0% Pembroke Park 30 32 30 93.8% 2 0 0.0% Pewsey 30 18 18 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 1 Pitton CE (VA) 17 6 6 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Preshute CE 30 22 22 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Priestley 35 24 24 100.0% 2 2 100.0% 3 Princecroft 30 16 16 100.0% Queen's Crescent 50 62 52 83.9% 3 0 0.0% 4 0 0.0% Ramsbury 30 32 29 90.6% Redland Community 38 69 40 58.0% 8 1 12.5% Rowde CE VA 30 33 29 87.9% 2 1 50.0% Rushall CE VA 12 18 15 83.3% Saint Edmund's R C 30 36 28 77.8% 2 2 100.0% 1 0 0.0% Salisbury Highbury 30 27 26 96.3% 4 Sarum St Paul's CE VA 30 31 30 96.8% 1 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% Seagry CE 17 11 11 100.0% Seend CE VA 17 11 11 100.0% Semley CE VA 18 12 12 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Shalbourne CE 8 5 5 100.0% Shaw CE (Controlled) 29 31 29 93.5% 1 1 100.0% Sherston CE 25 27 24 88.9% Shrewton CE 25 18 18 100.0% Somerfords Walter Powell 17 24 24 100.0%
Page 65
Preference PAN First Pref Second Pref Third Pref
Allocated Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Apps Offers % Southwick CE 25 24 24 100.0% St Andrew's CE VA 23 25 24 96.0% St Barnabas CE , Market Lavington 20 12 12 100.0% 1 1 100.0% St Bartholomew's CE (VA) 30 30 100.0% St Dunstan CE 60 29 29 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 St George's RC Warminster 30 10 10 100.0% 1 1 100.0% St George's CE , Semington 11 8 8 100.0% St John's Catholic Trowbridge 45 41 41 100.0% St John's CE 20 18 11 61.1% St John's CE , Warminster 17 18 18 100.0% St Joseph's Catholic Devizes 32 39 34 87.2% St Joseph's RC Malmesbury 16 14 13 92.9% 1 1 100.0% St Katharine's CE (VC) 12 12 12 100.0% 1 0 0.0% St Martin's CE (VA) 30 12 12 100.0% Broughton Gifford 12 12 12 100.0% St Mary's CE Infant 60 47 45 95.7% St Mary's CE , Purton 58 47 47 100.0% St Mary's R.C. , Chippenham 42 42 39 92.9% 1 1 100.0% 2 2 100.0% St Michael's CE (VA) Aldbourne 15 21 21 100.0% 1 0 0.0% St Nicholas CE(VC) Bromham 17 14 14 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 1 St Osmund's Catholic 30 30 30 100.0% St Patrick's Catholic 30 28 28 100.0% 2 2 100.0% St Paul's 40 50 43 86.0% 3 1 33.3% 1 0 0.0% St Peter's CE , Chippenham 40 36 31 86.1% 12 8 66.7% 1 0 0.0% St Peter's CE VA , Devizes 17 9 9 100.0% 1 1 100.0% St Sampson's Infant 60 49 48 98.0% St Thomas a Becket CE VA 10 3 3 100.0% Stanton St Quintin 21 30 20 66.7% Staverton CE VC 38 30 30 100.0% 3 3 100.0% 2 Stratford Sub Castle 21 28 28 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Studley Green 34 20 20 100.0% 1 Sutton Benger CE Aided 21 18 16 88.9% Sutton Veny CE (VC) 24 35 29 82.9% The Avenue Warminster 46 31 31 100.0% 1 1 100.0% The Manor CE 45 26 26 100.0% The Mead Community 60 88 60 68.2% 3 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% The Minster CE 34 35 33 94.3% 1 0 0.0% Trowbridge Longmeadow 38 17 17 100.0% Upavon 17 1 1 100.0% Urchfont C.E. 14 13 13 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Walwayne Court 42 30 29 96.7% 1 1 100.0% Wansdyke Community 30 34 30 88.2% 2 0 0.0% Wardour Catholic 15 12 12 100.0% Warminster Sambourne 34 29 29 100.0% 2 2 100.0% West Ashton CE VA 14 13 13 13.0% 3 2 66.7% Westbury Infants 80 63 63 100.0% 5 5 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 7 Westbury Leigh CE 60 71 61 85.9% 2 0 0.0% 1 Westwood-with-Iford 17 10 10 100.0% Whiteparish All Saints CE VA 17 16 16 100.0% Whitesheet CE VA 15 8 8 100.0% Wilton and Barford CE 37 22 22 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 2 Wingfield CE 12 7 7 100.0% Winsley CE VC 21 10 10 100.0% Winterbourne Earls CE 30 20 20 100.0% 2 2 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Winterslow CE Aided 30 11 11 100.0% Woodborough CE (VA) 20 20 19 95.0% 2 1 50.0% Woodford Valley CE (VA) 21 23 21 91.3% 1 0 0.0% Woodlands 30 34 30 88.2% 1 0 0.0% Wootton Bassett Infants 70 23 23 100.0% Wylye Valley 30 16 16 100.0% Wyndham Park Infants' 90 73 72 98.6% 1 1 100.0% 3 Zouch 55 44 44 100.0%
Total 4974 4648 93.4% 216 140 64.8% 41 21 51.2%
Page 66
Appendix D 2007-2008 School Entry Cohorts – background statistics
FSM Eligible Known BME SEN SEN with Statement In Care Jan 08
School Entry Cohort NOR Oct 07 No % No % No % No % No %
Primary Schools Alderbury & West Grimstead CE Primary R 25 0 0.0% 2 8.0% 2 8.0% 0 0.0% 1 4.0%
All Cannings CE Primary School R 16 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
All Saints VA CE Primary School, Netheravon R 30 0 0.0% 3 10.0% 1 3.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Aloeric Primary School R 44 0 0.0% 1 2.3% 1 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Amesbury Archer Primary School R 21 0 0.0% 1 4.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Amesbury CE VC Primary School R 28 2 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Ashton Keynes CE Primary School R 30 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Baydon St Nicholas CE School R 15 0 0.0% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Bellefield Primary and Nursery School R 33 1 3.0% 5 15.2% 2 6.1% 1 3.0% 0 0.0%
Bemerton St John CE Aided Primary School R 30 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 4 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Bishops Cannings CE (Aided) Primary School R 15 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Bitham Brook Primary School R 34 3 8.8% 1 2.9% 5 14.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Bowerhill Primary School R 42 0 0.0% 5 11.9% 3 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Box CE Primary School R 24 1 4.2% 3 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Bradford on Avon Christ Church R 52 1 1.9% 16 30.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Bratton Primary School R 26 2 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Brinkworth Earl Danby's CE Primary School R 22 0 0.0% 1 4.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Britford CE Controlled Primary School R 6 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Broad Chalke CE Aided Primary School R 23 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Broad Hinton CE Primary School R 18 0 0.0% 4 22.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Broad Town CE Primary School R 6 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Bulford Primary CE VA School R 31 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 16.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Burbage Primary School R 23 1 4.3% 1 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
By Brook Valley CE Primary School R 16 0 0.0% 2 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Castle Primary School, Ludgershall R 32 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Chapmanslade CE VA Primary School R 14 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Charter Primary School R 30 4 13.3% 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.3%
Cherhill CE Primary School R 24 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Chilmark & Fonthill Bishop CE Aided Primary School
R 13 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Chilton Foliat CE VA Primary School R 17 0 0.0% 4 23.5% 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Chirton CE Primary R 3 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Christ The King Catholic School Amesbury R 39 0 0.0% 5 12.8% 5 12.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Christian Malford CE Primary School R 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Churchfields, The Village School R 22 0 0.0% 1 4.5% 1 4.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Page 67
FSM Eligible Known BME SEN SEN with Statement In Care Jan 08
School Entry Cohort NOR Oct 07 No % No % No % No % No %
Clarendon Infants School R 57 1 1.8% 5 8.8% 8 14.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Colerne CE Primary School R 28 0 0.0% 1 3.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Collingbourne CE Primary School R 18 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 27.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Coombe Bissett CE Primary School R 13 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 0 0.0%
Corsham Primary School R 70 2 2.9% 5 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Corsham Regis Primary School R 21 1 4.8% 2 9.5% 2 9.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Crockerton CE VA Primary School R 13 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Crudwell CE Primary School R 19 1 5.3% 1 5.3% 1 5.3% 1 5.3% 0 0.0%
Dauntsey's Aided Primary School R 6 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Derry Hill CE VA School R 30 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Devizes Southbroom Infants School R 41 11 26.8% 6 14.6% 4 9.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Dilton Marsh CE Primary School R 20 1 5.0% 2 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Dinton CE VC Primary School R 6 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Downton CE (Voulntary Aided) Primary School R 25 1 4.0% 4 16.0% 3 12.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Durrington All Saints CE VC Infant School R 38 2 5.3% 0 0.0% 7 18.4% 0 0.0% 1 2.6%
Easton Royal Community Primary School R 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Figheldean St Michael's CE Primary School R 14 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 21.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Fitzmaurice Primary School R 33 1 3.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Five Lanes Primary R 19 1 5.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Forest & Sandridge CE Primary School R 29 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.4% 1 3.4% 0 0.0%
Frogwell Primary School R 45 4 8.9% 2 4.4% 3 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Fynamore Primary School R 59 2 3.4% 1 1.7% 4 6.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Gomeldon Primary School R 19 0 0.0% 2 10.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Grafton CE Primary School R 1 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Great Bedwyn CE Primary School R 25 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Great Cheverell, The Holy Trinity CE VA School R 6 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Great Wishford CE (Aided) Primary School R 13 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Greentrees Primary School R 30 0 0.0% 3 10.0% 6 20.0% 0 0.0% 2 6.7%
Grove Primary School R 60 0 0.0% 4 6.7% 2 3.3% 2 3.3% 0 0.0%
Harnham Infant School R 73 0 0.0% 5 6.8% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Heddington CE Primary School R 5 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Heytesbury CE Primary School R 12 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Hilmarton Primary School R 16 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Hilperton C.E.V.C. Primary School R 21 1 4.8% 1 4.8% 2 9.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Hindon CE VA Primary School R 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Holbrook Primary School R 16 1 6.3% 2 12.5% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Holt VC Primary School R 17 0 0.0% 1 5.9% 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Holy Trinity CE School, Calne R 31 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Horningsham Primary School R 14 0 0.0% 3 21.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Page 68
FSM Eligible Known BME SEN SEN with Statement In Care Jan 08
School Entry Cohort NOR Oct 07 No % No % No % No % No %
Hullavington CE School R 21 1 4.8% 5 23.8% 3 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Idmiston CE Aided Primary School R 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Ivy Lane Primary School R 48 4 8.3% 4 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Keevil CE Aided Primary School R 19 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.3% 1 5.3% 0 0.0%
Kennet Valley (CE Aided) Primary School R 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
King's Lodge Community School R 60 0 0.0% 8 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
King's Park Primary School, Melksham R 45 10 22.2% 8 17.8% 6 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Kington St Michael CE Primary School R 20 1 5.0% 2 10.0% 1 5.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Kiwi School R 22 0 0.0% 4 18.2% 1 4.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Lacock CE Primary School R 14 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Landford CE Primary School R 5 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Langley Fitzurse CE Primary School R 15 0 0.0% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Larkhill Primary School R 42 0 0.0% 4 9.5% 5 11.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Lea and Garsdon CE Primary School R 9 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Longleaze Primary School R 31 1 3.2% 3 9.7% 1 3.2% 1 3.2% 0 0.0%
Luckington Community School R 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Ludwell Community Primary School R 15 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Lydiard Millicent CE Primary School R 29 0 0.0% 2 6.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Lyneham Primary R 54 1 1.9% 46 85.2% 4 7.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Lypiatt Primary School R 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Malmesbury CE Primary School R 61 3 4.9% 4 6.6% 1 1.6% 1 1.6% 0 0.0%
Mere School R 35 0 0.0% 1 2.9% 5 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Minety CE Primary School R 10 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Monkton Park Community Primary School R 29 1 3.4% 3 10.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Morgan's Vale and Woodfalls CE VA Primary School
R 10 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Neston Primary School R 29 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
New Close Community School R 17 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 3 17.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Newton Tony CE VC Primary School R 3 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Newtown Community Primary School R 26 1 3.8% 4 15.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.8%
Nomansland and Hamptworth CE Aided Primary School
R 11 0 0.0% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
North Bradley CE Primary School R 24 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Nursteed Community Primary School R 27 0 0.0% 1 3.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Oaksey CE Primary School R 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Oare CE Primary School R 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Odstock Primary School R 4 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Ogbourne St George & St Andrew VC CE Primary School
R 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Paxcroft Primary School R 39 1 2.6% 2 5.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Pembroke Park Primary School R 28 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Pewsey Primary School R 14 1 7.1% 2 14.3% 5 35.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Page 69
FSM Eligible Known BME SEN SEN with Statement In Care Jan 08
School Entry Cohort NOR Oct 07 No % No % No % No % No %
Pitton CE (VA) Primary School R 10 0 0.0% 5 50.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Preshute CE Primary School R 28 0 0.0% 2 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Priestley Primary School R 14 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Princecroft Primary School R 12 3 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Queen's Crescent School R 49 1 2.0% 1 2.0% 1 2.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Ramsbury School R 28 0 0.0% 1 3.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Redland Community Primary School R 44 2 4.5% 1 2.3% 7 15.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Rowde CE VA Primary School R 23 4 17.4% 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Rushall CE VA School R 13 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Saint Edmund's R C Primary School R 28 2 7.1% 2 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Salisbury Highbury Primary R 20 0 0.0% 1 5.0% 5 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Sarum St Paul's CE VA Primary R 41 3 7.3% 2 4.9% 2 4.9% 1 2.4% 0 0.0%
Seagry CE Primary School R 7 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Seend CE VA Primary School R 15 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Semley CE VA Primary School R 21 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 4.8% 1 4.8% 0 0.0%
Shalbourne CE Primary School R 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Shaw CE (Controlled) Primary School R 35 2 5.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Sherston CE Primary School R 27 1 3.7% 2 7.4% 2 7.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Shrewton CE Primary School R 16 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Somerfords Walter Powell CE VA Primary School
R 9 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Southwick CE Primary School R 23 0 0.0% 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Andrew's CE VA Primary School R 17 1 5.9% 1 5.9% 2 11.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Barnabas CE School, Market Lavington R 13 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Bartholomew's CE Primary School (VA) R 38 1 2.6% 3 7.9% 2 5.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Dunstan CE Primary School R 43 5 11.6% 3 7.0% 8 18.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St George's Catholic Primary School, Warminster
R 16 0 0.0% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St George's CE Primary School, Semington R 16 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 12.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St John's Catholic School Trowbridge R 38 1 2.6% 8 21.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St John's CE Primary School R 11 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St John's CE Primary, Warminster R 11 2 18.2% 3 27.3% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Joseph's Catholic Primary School Devizes R 18 0 0.0% 5 27.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Joseph's Catholic Primary School Malmesbury
R 24 1 4.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Katharine's CE (VC) Primary School R 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Martin's CE (VA) Primary School R 19 4 21.1% 3 15.8% 1 5.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Mary's Broughton Gifford VC CE Primary School
R 10 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Mary's CE Infant School R 48 4 8.3% 2 4.2% 4 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Mary's CE Primary School, Purton R 39 0 0.0% 4 10.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Mary's R.C. Primary School, Chippenham R 41 0 0.0% 8 19.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Michael's CE (Aided) Primary School, Aldbourne
R 9 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Page 70
FSM Eligible Known BME SEN SEN with Statement In Care Jan 08
School Entry Cohort NOR Oct 07 No % No % No % No % No %
St Nicholas CE (V.C.) Primary School Bromham R 14 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Osmund's Catholic Primary School R 30 4 13.3% 8 26.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Patrick's Catholic Primary School R 30 0 0.0% 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Paul's Primary School R 37 0 0.0% 5 13.5% 4 10.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Peter's CE Primary School, Chippenham R 41 0 0.0% 2 4.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Peter's CE VA Primary School, Devizes R 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Sampson's Infant School R 56 2 3.6% 2 3.6% 4 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Thomas a Becket CE VA School R 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Stanton St Quintin Primary School R 19 1 5.3% 2 10.5% 1 5.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Staverton CE VC Primary School R 36 4 11.1% 5 13.9% 8 22.2% 1 2.8% 0 0.0%
Stratford-sub-Castle CE VC Primary School R 15 3 20.0% 2 13.3% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Studley Green Primary School R 21 1 4.8% 2 9.5% 4 19.0% 3 14.3% 0 0.0%
Sutton Benger CE Aided Primary School R 12 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Sutton Veny CE (VC) School R 21 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
The Avenue School and Early Years Centre R 42 2 4.8% 6 14.3% 5 11.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
The Manor CE Primary School R 21 1 4.8% 2 9.5% 2 9.5% 1 4.8% 0 0.0%
The Mead Community Primary School R 60 0 0.0% 3 5.0% 7 11.7% 1 1.7% 1 1.7%
The Minster CE Primary School R 29 0 0.0% 1 3.4% 2 6.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Trowbridge Longmeadow Primary School R 23 8 34.8% 5 21.7% 1 4.3% 0 0.0% 1 4.3%
Upavon Primary School R 3 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Urchfont C.E. Primary School R 13 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Walwayne Court School R 24 0 0.0% 4 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Wansdyke Community School R 35 2 5.7% 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Wardour Catholic Primary School R 11 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Warminster Sambourne CE (VC) Primary School R 23 1 4.3% 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
West Ashton CE VA Primary School R 7 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Westbury Infants School R 69 12 17.4% 4 5.8% 2 2.9% 1 1.4% 0 0.0%
Westbury Leigh CE Primary School R 56 4 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Westwood-with-Iford School R 10 0 0.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Whiteparish All Saints CE Aided Primary School R 14 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Whitesheet CE VA Primary School R 14 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.1%
Wilton and Barford CE Primary School R 19 4 21.1% 1 5.3% 2 10.5% 1 5.3% 0 0.0%
Wingfield CE Primary School R 8 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Winsley CE VC Primary School R 22 0 0.0% 2 9.1% 1 4.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Winterbourne Earls CE Primary School R 27 1 3.7% 1 3.7% 2 7.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Winterslow CE Aided Primary School R 25 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 4.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Woodborough CE (VA) Primary School R 19 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Woodford Valley CE (VA) School R 24 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 8.3% 2 8.3% 0 0.0%
Woodlands Primary School R 30 6 20.0% 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Page 71
FSM Eligible Known BME SEN SEN with Statement In Care Jan 08
School Entry Cohort NOR Oct 07 No % No % No % No % No %
Wootton Bassett Infants R 41 0 0.0% 3 7.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Wylye Valley School R 17 0 0.0% 6 35.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Wyndham Park Infants' School R 62 0 0.0% 3 4.8% 5 8.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Zouch Primary School R 27 0 0.0% 5 18.5% 4 14.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Junior Schools
Clarendon Junior School, Tidworth 3 82 2 2.4% 4 4.9% 20 24.4% 1 1.2% 0 0.0%
Durrington CE Controlled Junior School 3 47 2 4.3% 0 0.0% 9 19.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Harnham CE Controlled Junior School 3 61 4 6.6% 6 9.8% 12 19.7% 2 3.3% 0 0.0%
Noremarsh Junior Community School 3 40 2 5.0% 2 5.0% 3 7.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Southbroom CE Junior School 3 52 12 23.1% 1 1.9% 12 23.1% 1 1.9% 0 0.0%
St Mark's CE Junior School 3 85 4 4.7% 5 5.9% 10 11.8% 1 1.2% 0 0.0%
St Peter's Junior School 3 34 7 20.6% 2 5.9% 12 35.3% 1 2.9% 0 0.0%
St Sampson's CE Junior School 3 39 2 5.1% 4 10.3% 12 30.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Westbury CE Junior School 3 53 8 15.1% 10 18.9% 29 54.7% 3 5.7% 2 3.8%
Secondary Schools
Abbeyfield School 7 139 9 6.5% 9 6.5% 31 22.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0%
Avon Valley College 7 124 8 6.5% 7 5.6% 44 35.5% 3 2.4% 1 0.8%
Bishop Wordsworth's CE Grammar School for Boys
7 124 0 0.0% 5 4.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Bradon Forest School 7 250 14 5.6% 25 10.0% 56 22.4% 4 1.6% 2 0.8%
Castledown Foundation School 7 114 8 7.0% 14 12.3% 20 17.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0%
Devizes School 7 224 31 13.8% 7 3.1% 4 1.8% 3 1.3% 1 0.4%
Hardenhuish School 7 282 18 6.4% 14 5.0% 39 13.8% 9 3.2% 0 0.0%
Lavington School 7 130 0 0.0% 2 1.5% 14 10.8% 1 0.8% 0 0.0%
Malmesbury School 7 193 7 3.6% 10 5.2% 37 19.2% 1 0.5% 2 1.0%
Matravers School 7 169 19 11.2% 13 7.7% 28 16.6% 4 2.4% 3 1.8%
Pewsey Vale 7 69 3 4.3% 2 2.9% 4 5.8% 3 4.3% 0 0.0%
Salisbury High School 7 162 22 13.6% 7 4.3% 42 25.9% 6 3.7% 0 0.0%
Sheldon School 7 283 19 6.7% 24 8.5% 16 5.7% 7 2.5% 0 0.0%
South Wilts Grammar School for Girls 7 128 1 0.8% 8 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
St Augustine's Catholic School and Technology College
7 153 3 2.0% 27 17.6% 36 23.5% 3 2.0% 0 0.0%
St Edmund's CE Girls' School, Salisbury 7 123 9 7.3% 8 6.5% 13 10.6% 2 1.6% 0 0.0%
St John's School & Community College, Marlborough
7 217 11 5.1% 9 4.1% 36 16.6% 1 0.5% 0 0.0%
St Joseph's Catholic School, Salisbury 7 77 9 11.7% 6 7.8% 14 18.2% 6 7.8% 1 1.3%
St Laurence School 7 203 9 4.4% 9 4.4% 37 18.2% 3 1.5% 0 0.0%
The Clarendon College 7 213 20 9.4% 13 6.1% 60 28.2% 5 2.3% 1 0.5%
The Corsham School 7 212 20 9.4% 13 6.1% 52 24.5% 2 0.9% 0 0.0%
The George Ward School 7 207 11 5.3% 15 7.2% 73 35.3% 5 2.4% 3 1.4%
The John Bentley School 7 197 27 13.7% 6 3.0% 60 30.5% 5 2.5% 1 0.5%
The John of Gaunt School 7 192 24 12.5% 14 7.3% 14 7.3% 4 2.1% 1 0.5%
Page 72
FSM Eligible Known BME SEN SEN with Statement In Care Jan 08
School Entry Cohort NOR Oct 07 No % No % No % No % No %
The Stonehenge School 7 151 14 9.3% 14 9.3% 32 21.2% 3 2.0% 0 0.0%
The Trafalgar School at Downton 7 114 8 7.0% 9 7.9% 19 16.7% 5 4.4% 2 1.8%
Warminster Kingdown 7 238 15 6.3% 7 2.9% 41 17.2% 5 2.1% 0 0.0%
Wootton Bassett School 7 226 9 4.0% 18 8.0% 40 17.7% 5 2.2% 1 0.4%
Wyvern College 7 67 5 7.5% 2 3.0% 2 3.0% 1 1.5% 1 1.5%
Totals
10113 573 5.7% 739 7.3% 1225 12.1% 128 1.3% 31 0.3%
Page 73
Appendix E Year 6 2007 backgound statistics
Y6 NOR Oct 07
FSM Eligible
Known BME
SEN SEN with Statement
In Care Jan 07
First Prefs
Second Prefs
Third Prefs
Allocations
School No % No % No % No % No % % % % %
Alderbury & West Grimstead CE Primary 35 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 5 14.3% 1 2.9% 1 2.9% 65.5% 27.6% 6.9%
All Cannings CE Primary School 16 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
All Saints VA CE Primary School, Netheravon 17 0 0.0% 1 5.9% 3 17.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 86.7% 13.3%
Aloeric Primary School 59 2 3.4% 1 1.7% 23 39.0% 2 3.4% 0 0.0% 98.2% 1.8%
Amesbury Archer Primary School 21 1 4.8% 1 4.8% 6 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 91.3% 8.7%
Amesbury CE VC Primary School 51 6 11.8%
3 5.9% 11 21.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 87.8% 12.2%
Ashton Keynes CE Primary School 31 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 19.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Baydon St Nicholas CE School 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Bellefield Primary and Nursery School 40 13 32.5%
5 12.5%
11 27.5% 1 2.5% 0 0.0% 97.3% 2.7%
Bemerton St John CE VA Primary School 18 2 11.1%
2 11.1%
1 5.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 64.7% 29.4% 5.9%
Bishops Cannings CE (VA) Primary School 30 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 5 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 92.9% 3.6% 3.6%
Bitham Brook Primary School 46 3 6.5% 0 0.0% 9 19.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Bowerhill Primary School 54 1 1.9% 2 3.7% 11 20.4% 2 3.7% 1 1.9% 91.5% 1.7% 6.8%
Box CE Primary School 26 0 0.0% 2 7.7% 4 15.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 91.3% 4.3% 4.3%
Bradford on Avon Christ Church 61 2 3.3% 3 4.9% 9 14.8% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 96.7% 3.3%
Bratton Primary School 21 2 9.5% 1 4.8% 8 38.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 94.7% 5.3%
Brinkworth Earl Danby's CE Primary School 24 2 8.3% 1 4.2% 9 37.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Britford CE VC Primary School 6 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Broad Chalke CE VA Primary School 25 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 12.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 59.1% 31.8% 4.5% 4.5%
Broad Hinton CE Primary School 9 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 1 11.1%
0 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Broad Town CE Primary School 10 0 0.0% 1 10.0%
6 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Bulford Primary CE VA School 41 1 2.4% 1 2.4% 4 9.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 94.6% 5.4%
Burbage Primary School 21 2 9.5% 0 0.0% 3 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
By Brook Valley CE Primary School 17 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 29.4% 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Castle Primary School, Ludgershall 34 5 14.7%
1 2.9% 12 35.3% 2 5.9% 1 2.9% 93.1% 6.9%
Chapmanslade CE VA Primary School 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Charter Primary School 57 4 7.0% 5 8.8% 15 26.3% 3 5.3% 1 1.8% 79.6% 9.3% 11.1%
Cherhill CE Primary School 29 1 3.4% 1 3.4% 5 17.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 89.3% 7.1% 3.6%
Chilmark & Fonthill Bishop CE VA Primary School 12 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 70.0% 20.0% 10.0%
Chilton Foliat CE VA Primary School 13 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Chirton CE Primary 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Christ The King Catholic School Amesbury 38 0 0.0% 2 5.3% 21 55.3% 3 7.9% 0 0.0% 91.9% 8.1%
Christian Malford CE Primary School 19 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 31.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Churchfields, The Village School 13 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 30.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Clarendon Junior School, Tidworth 72 0 0.0% 6 8.3% 17 23.6% 2 2.8% 0 0.0% 95.6% 2.9% 1.5%
Colerne CE Primary School 38 0 0.0% 3 7.9% 5 13.2% 1 2.6% 0 0.0% 97.1% 2.9%
Collingbourne CE Primary School 8 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Coombe Bissett CE Primary School 12 2 16.7%
0 0.0% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%
Corsham Primary School 79 5 6.3% 4 5.1% 20 25.3% 3 3.8% 1 1.3% 98.7% 1.3%
Corsham Regis Primary School 30 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 8 26.7% 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 100.0%
Crockerton CE VA Primary School 13 0 0.0% 2 15.4%
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Crudwell CE Primary School 14 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 78.6% 21.4%
Dauntsey's VA Primary School 20 1 5.0% 2 10.0%
5 25.0% 1 5.0% 0 0.0% 94.1% 5.9%
Derry Hill CE VA School 32 0 0.0% 1 3.1% 5 15.6% 1 3.1% 0 0.0% 96.7% 3.3%
Dilton Marsh CE Primary School 22 1 4.5% 2 9.1% 10 45.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
Dinton CE VC Primary School 16 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 5 31.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 76.9% 15.4%
7.7%
Downton CE (Voulntary VA) Primary School 41 4 9.8% 2 4.9% 3 7.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 71.1% 26.3% 2.6%
Durrington CE VC Junior School 53 4 7.5% 1 1.9% 10 18.9% 4 7.5% 0 0.0% 90.6% 9.4%
Page 74
Y6 NOR Oct 07
FSM Eligible
Known BME
SEN SEN with Statement
In Care Jan 07
First Prefs
Second Prefs
Third Prefs
Allocations
School No % No % No % No % No % % % % %
Easton Royal Community Primary School 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Figheldean St Michael's CE Primary School 10 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
Fitzmaurice Primary School 28 3 10.7%
2 7.1% 15 53.6% 2 7.1% 0 0.0% 96.8% 3.2%
Five Lanes Primary 13 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Forest & Sandridge CE Primary School 27 3 11.1%
1 3.7% 2 7.4% 1 3.7% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Frogwell Primary School 58 7 12.1%
6 10.3%
16 27.6% 4 6.9% 0 0.0% 94.4% 3.7% 1.9%
Fynamore Primary School 56 2 3.6% 4 7.1% 17 30.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 87.3% 3.6% 3.6% 5.5%
Gomeldon Primary School 19 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 15.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 61.1% 33.3% 5.6%
Grafton CE Primary School 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Great Bedwyn CE Primary School 26 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 15.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Great Cheverell, The Holy Trinity CE VA School 17 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Great Wishford CE (VA) Primary School 20 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 15.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 68.4% 31.6%
Greentrees Primary School 29 1 3.4% 4 13.8%
8 27.6% 0 0.0% 2 6.9% 72.0% 20.0% 8.0%
Grove Primary School 62 6 9.7% 0 0.0% 9 14.5% 2 3.2% 0 0.0% 96.7% 3.3%
Harnham CE VC Junior School 81 6 7.4% 5 6.2% 27 33.3% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 68.7% 19.3% 3.6% 8.4%
Heddington CE Primary School 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Heytesbury CE Primary School 13 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Hilmarton Primary School 15 0 0.0% 1 6.7% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 80.0% 13.3% 6.7%
Hilperton C.E.V.C. Primary School 21 2 9.5% 1 4.8% 3 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Hindon CE VA Primary School 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 60.0% 40.0%
Holbrook Primary School 32 1 3.1% 4 12.5%
9 28.1% 1 3.1% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Holt VC Primary School 16 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Holy Trinity CE School, Calne 26 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 11.5% 2 7.7% 0 0.0% 84.0% 8.0% 8.0%
Horningsham Primary School 7 1 14.3%
0 0.0% 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Hullavington CE School 15 2 13.3%
2 13.3%
3 20.0% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Idmiston CE VA Primary School 15 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Ivy Lane Primary School 51 4 7.8% 3 5.9% 11 21.6% 1 2.0% 0 0.0% 88.5% 1.9% 3.8% 5.8%
Keevil CE VA Primary School 14 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 14.3% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 84.6% 15.4%
Kennet Valley (CE VA) Primary School 19 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 10.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
King's Lodge Community School 61 0 0.0% 3 4.9% 14 23.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 83.9% 3.2% 3.2% 9.7%
King's Park Primary School, Melksham 1 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
0 0.0% 100.0%
Kington St Michael CE Primary School 18 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Kiwi School 13 1 7.7% 3 23.1%
6 46.2% 2 15.4%
1 7.7% 77.8% 11.1% 11.1%
Lacock CE Primary School 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Landford CE Primary School 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 40.0% 40.0% 20.0%
Langley Fitzurse CE Primary School 16 0 0.0% 2 12.5%
2 12.5% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 93.3% 6.7%
Larkhill Primary School 35 1 2.9% 2 5.7% 12 34.3% 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Lea and Garsdon CE Primary School 14 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 42.9% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Longleaze Primary School 37 6 16.2%
3 8.1% 9 24.3% 2 5.4% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Luckington Community School 9 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Ludwell Community Primary School 6 0 0.0% 1 16.7%
3 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Lydiard Millicent CE Primary School 31 1 3.2% 4 12.9%
6 19.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Lyneham Primary 59 1 1.7% 33 55.9%
9 15.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Malmesbury CE Primary School 50 3 6.0% 4 8.0% 11 22.0% 1 2.0% 2 4.0% 100.0%
Mere School 28 2 7.1% 1 3.6% 3 10.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Minety CE Primary School 13 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Monkton Park Community Primary School 30 1 3.3% 2 6.7% 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 70.0% 30.0%
Morgan's Vale and Woodfalls CE VA Primary School
16 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 6 37.5% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 84.6% 15.4%
Neston Primary School 25 1 4.0% 0 0.0% 2 8.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
New Close Community School 31 1 3.2% 0 0.0% 6 19.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 96.4% 3.6%
Newton Tony CE VC Primary School 3 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Page 75
Y6 NOR Oct 07
FSM Eligible
Known BME
SEN SEN with Statement
In Care Jan 07
First Prefs
Second Prefs
Third Prefs
Allocations
School No % No % No % No % No % % % % %
Newtown Community Primary School 40 9 22.5%
6 15.0%
12 30.0% 1 2.5% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Nomansland and Hamptworth CE VA Primary School
11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 36.4% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Noremarsh Junior Community School 49 1 2.0% 5 10.2%
6 12.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
North Bradley CE Primary School 23 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 30.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Nursteed Community Primary School 26 6 23.1%
3 11.5%
12 46.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 96.3% 3.7%
Oaksey CE Primary School 14 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 3 21.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Oare CE Primary School 6 0 0.0% 1 16.7%
1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Odstock Primary School 12 0 0.0% 6 50.0%
6 50.0% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Ogbourne St George & St Andrew VC CE Primary School
13 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 3 23.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Paxcroft Primary School 39 0 0.0% 3 7.7% 11 28.2% 1 2.6% 0 0.0% 97.4% 2.6%
Pembroke Park Primary School 24 7 29.2%
2 8.3% 8 33.3% 1 4.2% 0 0.0% 69.2% 26.9% 3.8%
Pewsey Primary School 21 3 14.3%
1 4.8% 9 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 90.9% 9.1%
Pitton CE (VA) Primary School 15 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 66.7% 16.7% 16.7%
Preshute CE Primary School 31 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 6.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Priestley Primary School 22 4 18.2%
2 9.1% 6 27.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
Princecroft Primary School 24 4 16.7%
0 0.0% 6 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Queen's Crescent School 55 1 1.8% 3 5.5% 10 18.2% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 74.5% 12.7% 12.7%
Ramsbury School 29 1 3.4% 0 0.0% 4 13.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Redland Community Primary School 44 4 9.1% 3 6.8% 5 11.4% 2 4.5% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Rowde CE VA Primary School 32 1 3.1% 2 6.3% 8 25.0% 1 3.1% 0 0.0% 96.9% 3.1%
Rushall CE VA School 9 1 11.1%
0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
Saint Edmund's R C Primary School 30 3 10.0%
3 10.0%
4 13.3% 1 3.3% 0 0.0% 89.3% 7.1% 3.6%
Salisbury Highbury Primary 40 2 5.0% 2 5.0% 13 32.5% 4 10.0%
0 0.0% 90.2% 7.3% 2.4%
Sarum St Paul's CE VA Primary 26 4 15.4%
1 3.8% 3 11.5% 2 7.7% 0 0.0% 58.3% 37.5% 4.2%
Seagry CE Primary School 4 0 0.0% 1 25.0%
0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Seend CE VA Primary School 12 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 4 33.3% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Semley CE VA Primary School 14 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 33.3% 22.2% 11.1%
33.3%
Shalbourne CE Primary School 4 0 0.0% 2 50.0%
1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Shaw CE (VC) Primary School 31 1 3.2% 0 0.0% 10 32.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 96.4% 3.6%
Sherston CE Primary School 28 2 7.1% 3 10.7%
5 17.9% 1 3.6% 0 0.0% 96.3% 3.7%
Shrewton CE Primary School 16 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 93.8% 6.3%
Somerfords Walter Powell CE VA Primary School 7 0 0.0% 2 28.6%
2 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Southbroom CE Junior School 77 8 10.4%
0 0.0% 16 20.8% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Southwick CE Primary School 18 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 82.4% 17.6%
St Andrew's CE VA Primary School 32 2 6.3% 1 3.1% 3 9.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 70.0% 23.3% 3.3% 3.3%
St Barnabas CE School, Market Lavington 21 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 28.6% 1 4.8% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St Bartholomew's CE Primary School (VA) 48 2 4.2% 2 4.2% 10 20.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St Dunstan CE Primary School 63 17 27.0%
1 1.6% 32 50.8% 4 6.3% 2 3.2% 98.3% 1.7%
St George's Catholic Primary School, Warminster 31 1 3.2% 1 3.2% 5 16.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 82.8% 3.4% 6.9% 6.9%
St George's CE Primary School, Semington 9 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St John's Catholic School Trowbridge 44 0 0.0% 6 13.6%
6 13.6% 1 2.3% 0 0.0% 95.2% 4.8%
St John's CE Primary School 15 1 6.7% 2 13.3%
3 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 92.9% 7.1%
St John's CE Primary, Warminster 13 0 0.0% 2 15.4%
1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St Joseph's Catholic Primary School Devizes 34 0 0.0% 2 5.9% 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 93.5% 6.5%
St Joseph's Catholic Primary School Malmesbury 15 2 13.3%
2 13.3%
2 13.3% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 93.3% 6.7%
Page 76
Y6 NOR Oct 07
FSM Eligible
Known BME
SEN SEN with Statement
In Care Jan 07
First Prefs
Second Prefs
Third Prefs
Allocations
School No % No % No % No % No % % % % %
St Katharine's CE (VC) Primary School 8 1 12.5%
0 0.0% 4 50.0% 1 12.5%
0 0.0% 100.0%
St Mark's CE Junior School 94 1 1.1% 6 6.4% 5 5.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 69.2% 20.9% 5.5% 4.4%
St Martin's CE (VA) Primary School 21 7 33.3%
4 19.0%
2 9.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 60.0% 25.0% 10.0%
5.0%
St Mary's Broughton Gifford VC CE Primary School
9 0 0.0% 1 11.1%
1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St Mary's CE Primary School, Purton 51 2 3.9% 3 5.9% 13 25.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St Mary's R.C. Primary School, Chippenham 30 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 93.3% 3.3% 3.3%
St Michael's CE (VA) Primary School, Aldbourne 16 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St Nicholas CE (V.C.) Primary School Bromham 18 2 11.1%
0 0.0% 3 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St Osmund's Catholic Primary School 31 3 9.7% 5 16.1%
4 12.9% 1 3.2% 1 3.2% 48.3% 41.4% 3.4% 6.9%
St Patrick's Catholic Primary School 30 3 10.0%
2 6.7% 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 90.0% 3.3% 6.7%
St Paul's Primary School 39 3 7.7% 2 5.1% 10 25.6% 1 2.6% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St Peter's CE Primary School, Chippenham 40 0 0.0% 2 5.0% 6 15.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 90.0% 7.5% 2.5%
St Peter's CE VA Primary School, Devizes 17 4 23.5%
0 0.0% 7 41.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
St Peter's Junior School 54 2 3.7% 3 5.6% 9 16.7% 6 11.1%
0 0.0% 100.0%
St Sampson's CE Junior School 60 4 6.7% 4 6.7% 4 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 98.2% 1.8%
St Thomas a Becket CE VA School 9 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 1 11.1%
0 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
Stanton St Quintin Primary School 15 0 0.0% 2 13.3%
2 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Staverton CE VC Primary School 40 0 0.0% 1 2.5% 4 10.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 94.6% 5.4%
Stratford-sub-Castle CE VC Primary School 16 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 5 31.3% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 52.9% 35.3% 11.8%
Studley Green Primary School 33 15 45.5%
4 12.1%
12 36.4% 5 15.2%
0 0.0% 100.0%
Sutton Benger CE VA Primary School 21 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 19.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Sutton Veny CE (VC) School 18 0 0.0% 2 11.1%
5 27.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
The Avenue School and Early Years Centre 36 7 19.4%
2 5.6% 17 47.2% 7 19.4%
0 0.0% 100.0%
The Manor CE Primary School 80 6 7.5% 2 2.5% 35 43.8% 5 6.3% 0 0.0% 100.0%
The Mead Community Primary School 59 0 0.0% 6 10.2%
18 30.5% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 98.3% 1.7%
The Minster CE Primary School 29 1 3.4% 1 3.4% 8 27.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 93.3% 3.3% 3.3%
Trowbridge Longmeadow Primary School 25 9 36.0%
5 20.0%
10 40.0% 1 4.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Upavon Primary School 6 1 16.7%
1 16.7%
3 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Urchfont C.E. Primary School 17 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 23.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Walwayne Court School 44 2 4.5% 4 9.1% 10 22.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Wansdyke Community School 32 2 6.3% 0 0.0% 3 9.4% 3 9.4% 0 0.0% 93.3% 3.3% 3.3%
Wardour Catholic Primary School 13 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 70.0% 20.0% 10.0%
Warminster Sambourne CE (VC) Primary School 23 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
West Ashton CE VA Primary School 12 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Westbury CE Junior School 71 16 22.5%
6 8.5% 16 22.5% 3 4.2% 1 1.4% 98.6% 1.4%
Westbury Leigh CE Primary School 57 4 7.0% 1 1.8% 10 17.5% 2 3.5% 0 0.0% 98.1% 1.9%
Westwood-with-Iford School 16 0 0.0% 2 12.5%
4 25.0% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Whiteparish All Saints CE VA Primary School 13 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
Whitesheet CE VA Primary School 17 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 17.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Wilton and Barford CE Primary School 27 4 14.8%
1 3.7% 10 37.0% 1 3.7% 0 0.0% 76.9% 19.2% 3.8%
Wingfield CE Primary School 9 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Winsley CE VC Primary School 22 0 0.0% 3 13.6%
3 13.6% 1 4.5% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Winterbourne Earls CE Primary School 23 2 8.7% 2 8.7% 1 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 65.0% 20.0% 15.0%
Winterslow CE VA Primary School 30 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 6 20.0% 1 3.3% 1 3.3% 68.2% 22.7% 9.1%
Woodborough CE (VA) Primary School 21 0 0.0% 1 4.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 89.5% 10.5%
Woodford Valley CE (VA) School 25 0 0.0% 2 8.0% 5 20.0% 3 12.0%
0 0.0% 71.4% 23.8% 4.8%
Woodlands Primary School 31 4 12.9 0 0.0% 17 54.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
Page 77
Y6 NOR Oct 07
FSM Eligible
Known BME
SEN SEN with Statement
In Care Jan 07
First Prefs
Second Prefs
Third Prefs
Allocations
School No % No % No % No % No % % % % %
%
Wylye Valley School 17 1 5.9% 1 5.9% 6 35.3% 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 100.0%
Zouch Primary School 22 2 9.1% 1 4.5% 8 36.4% 2 9.1% 0 0.0% 95.2% 4.8%
Totals 5200 325 6.3% 309 5.9% 1153 22.2% 130 2.5% 16 0.3% 91.5% 5.8% 0.8% 1.9%
Page 78
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
1 of 19
LOCAL AUTHORITY REPORT
TO
THE SCHOOLS ADJUDICATOR
FROM
Wiltshire Council
30 JUNE 2009 Report Cleared by: Bryan Cash Education Officer (Admissions) Date submitted: By: Bryan Cash Contact email address: [email protected] Telephone number: 01225 713873
Page 79
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
2 of 19
SECTION 1 FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR IN WHICH THE REPORT IS MADE - 2008 -2009 Please complete using data/information for the period 1 September 2008 to date of report
Code 4.9 a) (i) how well the Fair Access Protocol has worked and how many children have been admitted to each school in the area under the protocol; The Code at 3.44 requires (1) each local authority to have a Fair Access Protocol and (2) all schools and Academies to participate in their LA area’s protocol
a) Please confirm that the LA has a Fair Access Protocol that has been agreed with all the relevant schools in its area.
Protocol not yet agreed by all schools and academies?
Original protocol was accepted at heads’ forum meetings. Revised Protocol has not yet been formally agreed by all maintained schools and the academy.
b) Give your assessment of how well the Fair Access Protocol has
worked since 1 September 2008:
a. in placing children in schools;
Since in Wiltshire where we have schools which are geographically quite far apart or for which travelling times are long (where links exist at all) we operate a local schools for local children policy. We find that most children can be found a place at their local school. Our FAP only kicks in when the normal admissions process has broken down and so the numbers involved have been quite small. Our current protocol has worked to some extent but does require revision. (see c below)
b. the co-operation of schools and Academies in implementing the
protocol; and
Collaborative working is in its infancy. There are signs of an increasing desire of schools to work together within their area collaboratives.
c. any issues you have had in implementing the protocol.
Difficulty in getting schools to take young people in Year 10 and
Page 80
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
3 of 19
even more in Year 11. This is not just a feature of FAP it is a general reluctance to take children into existing examination groups. Our original protocol was identified as having some basic parts missing. Who should initiate the FAP, a set timetable for dealing with issues and what happens if a collaborative agreement can’t be reached were the three areas of concern. These have been rectified in our revised protocol but this hasn’t yet gone to all schools for their formal agreement. Reducing the time that children and young people are out of school is a key priority for us but we have been frustrated at times that the whole process has taken too long because of having to deal with schools who are their own admissions authorities. Parents often seem to name preferences when their chance of getting into a full school mid term is often difficult, and as a result we are looking at ways of better informing parents of what is available prior to them completing an application form. The whole principle of who should be working to find places for any hard to place children is always under review. Our hard pressed admissions team do find it difficult because proportionally hard to place youngsters take much more time to sort out than normal round or other in-year admissions. Therefore engaging with our Educational Welfare Service and others in Targeted Support has been vital in getting dialogue going with schools and settings.
c) In Appendix A, please record for each school the number of children directed to (column O) and admitted (column P) to the school under the protocol between 1 September 2008 and date of report.
This has not been done for all schools since the overall numbers involved are too small. In Chippenham, six young people met the FAP criteria and were shared out between the three secondary schools. In other instances an individual school has taken the child and so the formal FAP has not been used. All schools have taken children on roll when directed. As previously stated in a rural situation it isn’t always easy to find an alternative school which it is reasonable to expect a child to attend so very often a local school will take ownership of the child and this means the FAP is not used.
Page 81
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
4 of 19
Code 4.9 a) (ii) whether primary schools are complying with infant class size legislation Please include in your comments the number of schools where qualifying measures are being taken. A small number of schools have had to breach the class size regulations. These have all been as a result of exceptional circumstances. In the majority of cases it is because there is no reasonable alternative within a safe distance of the school. As a result of natural pupil movements (in a county where there is high mobility in many schools) these situations have corrected themselves. In one school (Amesbury Archer) the local authority is providing free transport to the next nearest school because of the medical condition of the child’s mother. In 2009 1 school has been reported as breaching ICS and if there is no pupil movement additional staffing will have to be put in place as a qualifying measure. The number on roll and class organisation is monitored three times a year by an officer in the School Admissions Team. Schools have reported that the ‘Managing Compliance with the Infant Class Size Duty’ guidelines are unclear in regards to the position of HLTAs. They have commented that they find sections 2, 3 and 4 of Annex A inconsistent and contradictory. Many smaller schools and those with falling rolls are finding the financial burden of providing suitable qualified teachers to avoid ICS issues quite a challenge.
Page 82
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
5 of 19
Code 4.9 a) (iii) the number of admissions appeals held for each and every school in the area, and the number of appeals that were upheld. Please insert the data covering the period 1 September 2008 to the date of the report in Appendix A to show for each school:
- column Q - the number of appeals held; - column R - the number of appeals upheld; and - column S - the number of appeals pending from the date of the report onwards.
Code 4.9 a) iv the extent to which the local authority and appeal panels in the area complied with the requirements of the Appeals Code, with reference to ensuring the timeliness and transparency of appeals, effective communications with parents and any other relevant matter. Please include in your comments, where there is evidence of non-compliance, what action have you taken. The local authority administers appeals for all community and voluntary controlled schools; the Diocese of Salisbury has provided a service for its schools using expertise from a neighbouring Diocese. The LA does not collect in statistical information about the number of appeals in the VA and F schools so this is not included in the appendix. Those schools report their appeals information directly to DCSF. There have been two complaints made to the LGO regarding appeals for two community schools both have been dismissed. The local authority is not aware of any non-compliance in the way VA and F schools run their appeals. Some use our panel members and at times we extend our sessions to include the VA or F school at the end after other appeals have been heard. There have been a significant number of appeals at Sheldon and Hardenhuish schools in Chippenham and also at St Augustine’s RC Catholic College in Trowbridge. Although at other schools places are refused it is often the case that a place becomes available before the appeal is heard due to someone declining a previous offer and thus releasing a place.
Page 83
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
6 of 19
4.9 d) iii any other matters which affect the fairness of admission arrangements for schools for schools in the area. Please complete with reference to Choice Advice provided to parents applying for a secondary school place for the 2009/2010 school year. Appendix 5 of the Code requires local authorities to provide an independent Choice Advice service that is focused on supporting the families who most need support in navigating the secondary school admissions process (paragraph 5). Choice Advice must be independent and free from any potential conflict of interest between the need of the local authority to allocate places and the advice that parents receive (paragraph 8). As a minimum, local authorities must ensure that Choice Advisers are not in the same management chain or reporting lines as the local authority’s admissions staff (paragraph 9).
a) Please confirm that your local authority has an independent Choice Advice service in place.
YES we have engaged our independent Family Information Service to provide the Choice Advice Service too. The Local Authority is confident in the service which is available to our residents.
b) Please explain how you ensure the independence of the Choice
Advice provided (for example, the Choice Advice service may be situated in the Parent Partnership service or Family Information Service). ASK is an independent Family Information Service. Initially they were commissioned to provide information to pre-school children but have expanded their operation to include SEN and now secondary Choice Advice.
c) Please confirm that your Choice Adviser(s) are in not in the
same line management chain or reporting lines as staff on the admissions team.
YES – they are independent and are not Council employees. They do not operate from County Hall.
Choice Advice must be targeted at those parents who most need support with the secondary school admissions process (paragraph 10). Local authorities and Choice Advisers should market their service to ensure that they reach the families most in need of their support and that other relevant agencies and professionals are aware of the service they provide (paragraph 11). Choice Advisers should be proactive in reaching ‘hard to reach’ parents and should develop good links with organisations that may be able to refer parents to them (paragraph 12).
Page 84
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
7 of 19
d) Please explain how you ensure Choice Advice reaches those parents
who are most in need of it. Choice Advisers are sent information on who has and who has not applied for school places. They target individuals by making phone contact or by writing letters. CA service also contacts all Year 5 pupils to ensure they know about the service they offer and the deadlines for admissions. There is still work to do to reach the most vulnerable parents as described by the TOR for CAs.
e) Describe how has Choice Advice contributed to the fairness of the
admissions process.
The two Choice Advisors sit on our Admissions Forum. They provide a report as a standing item on the agenda of every meeting. The CAs set targets and are especially keen to reduce the number of applicants who miss the deadline. Regular reports are made to the School Admissions Team and we have regular meetings (roughly two months apart). CAs look at proposed admission arrangements and make comments on publications the School Admissions Team produces
Local authorities may provide Choice Advice at the primary school admission stage and for in-year applications (paragraph 5).
f) Choice Advice is offered at the primary admissions stage?
SOME on request
g) Choice Advice is offered for in-year applications?
SOME on request It is good practice for Choice Advisers to provide support during the appeals process, particularly to those parents who accessed Choice Advice at the application stage.
h) The Choice Adviser provides support during the appeals process?
Yes in some cases. Choice Advisers provide advice to parents who are appealing and at times request information to assist parents write their appeal. Have attended two appeals panels to support appellant.
Page 85
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
8 of 19
i) We plan to provide support during the appeals process in future?
YES
Page 86
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
9 of 19
SECTION 2 FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR WHICH STARTS AFTER THE REPORT IS MADE – 2009-2010: Code 4.9 b) (i) the extent to which admission arrangements for schools in the authority’s area serve the interests of children in care, children with disabilities, children with special educational needs and service children. Note: You may wish to point out if specialist staff from within the Council has contributed to this report. Children in Care – all applicants have been offered their first preference. Virtual headteacher for LAC has negotiated with schools individually on some in-year admissions. Difficulties arise if admissions are for Year 10 and 11 where the fit of exam courses is critical. Since most schools will take their in-area children without any direction this has not been a major issue. Where schools share designated areas (in Chippenham in particular) there has been some reluctance of schools to take in children over PAN. Children with disabilities -high priority is given to these children and no issues have arisen. Special Educational Needs – children without statements are considered using the normal admission arrangements. Those with statements go to the named school and the policy is unless in exceptional circumstances to put the child into their preferred school. Service children – Wiltshire has a very high concentration of service families. We have a member of the Service Families Education Team on our Admissions Forum. We comply with all aspects of the Code. There can be issues when service families move into quarters which are in residential areas (i.e. mixed with civilian housing) especially if the move is out of normal round. Since we cannot reserve places and the service families cannot be treated as exceptions to the ICS they often face refusals and appeals. Code 4.9 b) (ii) the effectiveness of co-ordination. Note: You may wish to report on the authority’s assessment of the effectiveness of any scheme for co-ordinating:
a) the admission of pupils to relevant schools in the authority’s area in the next academic year to begin after the date of the report, and b) the admission of pupils in the authority’s area to other relevant schools in that academic year.
Page 87
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
10 of 19
The normal admissions round co-ordination runs effectively. There are still some minor issues surrounding admissions to VA and F schools but these have been dealt with. Co-ordination is accepted practice. However there are a small number of schools and admin officers who can’t see the need for what they see as red tape but they follow the co-ordinated scheme. Any scheme we develop for in-year co-ordination needs to ensure that children are out of school for a short a period as possible and some schools fear that the process may delay their ability to make a quick decision about some transfers. The effectiveness of data transfers with other local authorities are improving year on year. We have sent out more reports to schools in Wiltshire on the number of applications being received and offers made, schools attended and so on. Schools have appreciated this. In area co-ordination for intake to primary schools is accepted. Without the need to do cross border co-ordination, the data transfer issues do not arise. We are happy to move to a system of cross border co-ordination for the normal intake rounds with effect from the 2011 intake. In Year Co-ordination. This will be a major issue and challenge for September 2010 onwards. Wiltshire is happy that there should be in-year co-ordination but do not see any advantages in having this cross authority borders. If a parent is interested in a Wiltshire school we would be happy to deal with their enquiries and application wherever they live. Getting them to go through their home authority seems to be adding an unnecessary administrative process. Securing places a soon as possible would be helped if the maintaining authority dealt with the application rather than the home authority.
Page 88
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
11 of 19
SECTION 3 FOR ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED IN THE APRIL IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THE DATE OF THE REPORT IS MADE (determined by 15 April 2009 for admission in September 2010): Code 4.9 c) (i) a statement of whether or not admission arrangements for maintained schools in the area complied with the mandatory requirements of this Code and admissions law. Are you satisfied that the admission arrangements for all maintained schools in your area are fully compliant with the Code? For those schools who have followed the statutory process to the
letter YES. It is still an issue getting all schools to respond as per the Code but those who do not are the ones who are undersubscribed so are unlikely to need to apply their oversubscription criteria.
If NO, please specify what action you are taking – please see paragraph “Referring objections to the Schools Adjudicator” on page 10.
The LA has been chasing three schools for their admission arrangements. We have had to ring round several schools since we need to incorporate oversubscription criteria into our composite guide which has to go for printing by 1 July. No referrals to Schools Adjudicator have been necessary.
Following the compliance exercise in 2008, the Chief Adjudicator wrote to all local authorities with details of where the admission arrangements for schools in their area may not be compliant with the Code. Subsequently, local authorities were asked to report on the action that had been taken to amend the arrangements. Are you satisfied that all the necessary action that was said to be needed has been taken for the arrangements determined by 15 April 2009? YES If you are not completely satisfied, what further action are you taking? N/A
Page 89
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
12 of 19
The Schools Adjudicator and local authority reports Code 4.10 local authority reports play an important part in monitoring schools’ compliance with this Code and ensuring an open and fair admissions system. The Schools Adjudicator must ensure that admission arrangements which come to his attention via local authority reports, and any Admission Forum reports that he receives comply with this Code and admissions legislation. This will form the basis of an annual report to the Secretary of State which will also include how fair access is being achieved locally. The Schools Adjudicator’s annual report to the Secretary of State on fair access replaces the biennial report of the Schools Commissioner. Code 4.11 where a local authority report, under section 88P of the SSFA 1998, states that admission arrangements for maintained schools do not or may not conform with statutory requirements or the mandatory requirements of this Code, the Schools Adjudicator must decide whether the arrangements are compliant. In the case of Academies he may advise the Secretary of State on whether he considers the arrangements are compliant and the Secretary of State will reach a decision on any changes that are necessary. Referring objections to the Schools Adjudicator Code 4.12 local authorities must refer an objection to the Schools Adjudicator if they consider, or are made aware of any admission arrangements proposed by any other admission authority that are unlawful, that do not comply with the mandatory requirements or guidelines in this Code, or that appear to be unfair, unclear and subjective or encouraged social segregation. Local authorities must refer the objection as soon as such admission arrangements come to their attention. Local authorities may refer such an objection with their report or separately. Code 4.13 local authorities must also consider carefully any representations they receive from parents about the admission arrangements for schools for which they are not the admission authority and whether they will use their power to make an objection to the Authority. Using Appendix A, please identify any schools (column U) that you have referred to the OSA, or may be referring to the OSA by the 31 July 2009.
Page 90
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
13 of 19
SECTION 4 OTHER MATTERS: Code 4.9 d) (i) details about the current membership of the Admission Forum for the area Please list the bodies represented and the number of representatives in each category. Do NOT give the names of members. Elected Members 3 Diocesan Reps 4 VA Primary Schools 1 VA Secondary Schools 1 Foundation Secondary Schools 2 C&VC Primary Schools 1 C&VC Secondary Schools 2 Parent Governors 3 Children’s Education Advisory Service (MoD) 1 Educational Welfare Service 1 Young Peoples Support 1 SEN 1 Choice Advisers 2 LA Admissions Team 3 Other LAs 3 Please add any comments on the transition from the previous to the new constitution of the Forum; the effectiveness of the Forum in challenging non-compliant admission arrangements; the contribution of the Forum in promoting fair access. A review of membership has been requested by the Forum for their consideration at their meeting in September 2009. Due to recent council elections there will be a change of chair and elected members so it was felt appropriate to wait until the dust had settled before changing the forum membership. The new membership is likely to be very similar with reps invited as above – though not all will attend every meeting. The Admission Forum may make a report to the Schools Adjudicator. If the Forum wishes to make such a report it would be helpful to include the report with the report from the local authority. Please indicate:
The Admission Forum wishes to make a report to the Schools Adjudicator and has included/attached it with this report OR
Page 91
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
14 of 19
The Admission Forum wishes to make a report to the Schools Adjudicator and will send a separate report by ………….. OR The Admissions Forum does not wish to make a report to the Schools Adjudicator in 2009.
Whether or not the Admission Forum is making/submitting a report, please confirm that the Forum has seen, or will see, this LA report. The report has been circulated to all members of the Forum. Some
minor amendments have been incorporated into the report. The Forum will not be submitting a separate report.
Page 92
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
15 of 19
Code 4.9 d) (ii) the proportion of children currently on free school meals at each school in the area. The data provided by the Local Authority to the DCSF in January 2008 has been “cleaned” and is included in Appendix A at the end of this template. If the data for 2009 is significantly different please state how it differs. Using and interpreting the data, please comment on any features associated with Fair Access to allocation of school places and meeting parental preferences. Code 4.9 d) (iii) any other matters which affect the fairness of admission arrangements for schools in the area. Please provide evidence about or any information, that in your view affect the fairness of admission arrangements by improving or reducing the fairness for schools in your area. No particular issues have surfaced this year which would indicate that the admissions system isn’t providing a fair process for our residents.
Page 93
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
16 of 19
SECTION 5 RANDOM ALLOCATION OF SCHOOL PLACES 1. Was random allocation being used in any way by the local authority in allocating places at community and/or voluntary controlled schools for September 2009:
(a) infant/primary/middle deemed primary schools?
YES If yes, please specify how?
As a last resort if distance cannot separate applications we would do a random allocation by drawing lots.
(b) in secondary/middle deemed secondary schools?
YES If yes, please specify how?
As a last resort if distance cannot separate applications we would do a random allocation by drawing lots.
2. Do the determined admission arrangements for admission in 2010 use random allocation in the same way as 2009 arrangements?
YES If no, please specify the changes that have been made. 3. What are your views on whether the outcomes of random allocation as used by the local authority result in fair outcomes for parents? The random allocation tie break had not been used this year. 4. What evidence do you have of parental reaction to the use of random allocation and parental understanding of how the system works? One foundation school considered random allocation. There were as
Page 94
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
17 of 19
many parents who supported this as opposed it. In a rural county like Wiltshire it is difficult to see how a random allocation system would benefit applicants. Having clear designated areas for schools is accepted practice.
5. For all foundation and voluntary aided schools in your area, please indicate in Appendix A (column T), those schools that use random allocation in any part of its admission arrangements.
Some do as per the local authority tie break. Only one VA school (St Joseph’s Devizes) used a random allocation to allocate places for children in their last admission criterion. One (Sheldon Secondary in Chippenham) suggested part random allocation in their consultation document but this was removed prior to determination of their 20010/11 policy.
Page 95
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
18 of 19
SECTION 6 ADMISSION OF TWINS TO THE SAME SCHOOL 1a). What is your policy on the admission of twins (and multiple births) to primary schools? We will admit over PAN unless this would create an Infant Class Size issue. If we cannot find a place for both twins we would offer a school where we could though the parent would have the option of splitting the twins. b). What is your policy when the last place of the admission number is allocated to one twin (or fewer than all born in a multiple birth)? We will admit over PAN unless this would create an ICS issue. The elder twin would be admitted if they were split. 2a). What is your policy on the admission of twins (and multiple births) to secondary school? We will admit over PAN. If we could not find a place for both twins we would offer a school where we could though the parent would have the option of splitting the twins though this is very unlikely to happen in secondary schools. b) What is your policy when the last place of the admission number is allocated to one twin (or fewer than all born in a multiple birth)? We will admit over PAN to accommodate twins. 3) Please indicate below, those Foundation and Voluntary Aided schools within your area, that do not have a policy on admission of twins (and multiple births). Following advice the LA has sent out, all schools have a reference to twins in their policies and most follow the LA policy above. Some schools will let the parents choose which twin to offer a place to if they are the last one to be offered a place. However twins are accommodated in all schools unless an ICS issue exists. The Local Authority would welcome twins being made a permitted exception to the ICS regulations. We are considering making amendments to our 2011 policy to push twins higher up the
Page 96
Document Title: LA report Wiltshire Council June09 Document Status: APPROVED
19 of 19
oversubscription criteria – by treating them as vulnerable children who would be looked at before any in area siblings which in effect would mean we would admit twins in most circumstances. However just because the LA does it wouldn’t mean all of our foundation or VA schools would follow suit. If twins applied late outside the normal round they still might have top be split if an ICS was being created so the only way of guaranteeing that twins are kept together would be for them to be permitted exceptions to the ICS regulations.
Page 97
Page 98
This page is intentionally left blank
URN
LEA
Num
ber
Esta
b Nu
mbe
rLA
Est
abSe
x of s
choo
l de
scrip
tion
Scho
ol N
ame
Scho
ol T
ype
2008
NOR
1320
9386
520
0386
5200
3M
ixed
Fyna
mor
e Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity39
4
1328
3186
520
0486
5200
4M
ixed
Gre
entre
es P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity22
4
1328
3286
520
0586
5200
5M
ixed
Nurs
teed
Com
mun
ity P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity18
3
1320
9286
520
0686
5200
6M
ixed
The
Mea
d Co
mm
unity
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
423
1261
7786
520
0886
5200
8M
ixed
Fitz
mau
rice
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
197
1261
7886
520
0986
5200
9M
ixed
Brat
ton
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
178
1261
8186
520
2286
5202
2M
ixed
Ivy
Lane
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
317
1261
8286
520
2386
5202
3M
ixed
St P
aul's
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
274
1261
8486
520
2886
5202
8M
ixed
Cors
ham
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
540
1261
8586
520
2986
5202
9M
ixed
Lypi
att P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity16
1261
8686
520
3186
5203
1M
ixed
Nest
on P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity17
0
1261
8786
520
3286
5203
2M
ixed
Cors
ham
Reg
is Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity18
2
1261
8886
520
3486
5203
4M
ixed
Chip
penh
am, M
onkt
on P
ark
Prim
ary
Com
mun
ity19
1
1261
9186
520
3786
5203
7M
ixed
Sout
hbro
om In
fant
s' Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity13
7
1261
9286
520
4086
5204
0M
ixed
East
on R
oyal
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
46
1261
9586
520
4586
5204
5M
ixed
Gom
eldo
n Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity14
3
1261
9886
520
5286
5205
2M
ixed
Hilm
arto
n Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity10
8
1261
9986
520
5386
5205
3M
ixed
Horn
ings
ham
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
69
1262
0086
520
6086
5206
0M
ixed
Luck
ingt
on C
omm
unity
Sch
ool
Com
mun
ity41
1262
0286
520
6586
5206
5M
ixed
Lark
hill P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity25
1
1262
0386
520
7686
5207
6M
ixed
Ods
tock
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
45
1262
0486
520
8686
5208
6M
ixed
Stan
ton
St Q
uint
in C
omm
unity
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
110
1262
0586
520
8786
5208
7M
ixed
Ram
sbur
y Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity20
0
1262
0686
520
9186
5209
1M
ixed
Harn
ham
Infa
nts'
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
215
1262
3086
521
2986
5212
9M
ixed
Upav
on P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity44
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 99
1262
3286
521
3486
5213
4M
ixed
New
Clos
e Co
mm
unity
Sch
ool
Com
mun
ity16
5
1262
3386
521
3686
5213
6M
ixed
Wes
tbur
y In
fant
s' Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity17
5
1262
3486
521
3786
5213
7M
ixed
Wes
twoo
d-wi
th-If
ord
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
98
1262
3586
521
4086
5214
0M
ixed
Woo
tton
Bass
ett I
nfan
ts' S
choo
lCo
mm
unity
133
1262
4686
521
5786
5215
7M
ixed
Wyn
dham
Par
k In
fant
s' Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity21
8
1262
4886
521
5986
5215
9M
ixed
Kiwi
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
156
1262
5086
521
6286
5216
2M
ixed
Nore
mar
sh C
omm
unity
Jun
ior S
choo
lCo
mm
unity
185
1262
5486
521
6886
5216
8M
ixed
Prie
stle
y Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity14
4
1262
5586
521
7086
5217
0M
ixed
Gro
ve P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity42
1
1262
5986
521
7886
5217
8M
ixed
Prin
cecr
oft P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity12
0
1262
6086
521
8086
5218
0M
ixed
Redl
and
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
285
1262
6286
521
8486
5218
4M
ixed
Long
leaz
e Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity21
9
1262
6386
521
8586
5218
5M
ixed
Mer
e Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity20
6
1262
6486
521
9086
5219
0M
ixed
Woo
dlan
ds P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity23
5
1262
6586
521
9186
5219
1M
ixed
High
bury
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
208
1262
6686
521
9286
5219
2M
ixed
Pem
brok
e Pa
rk P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity20
7
1262
6786
521
9386
5219
3M
ixed
Wan
sdyk
e Co
mm
unity
Sch
ool
Com
mun
ity24
4
1262
6986
521
9686
5219
6M
ixed
Holb
rook
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
207
1262
7186
521
9886
5219
8M
ixed
Ludw
ell C
omm
unity
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
66
1262
7386
522
0286
5220
2M
ixed
St S
amps
on's
Infa
nts'
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
164
1262
7886
522
0886
5220
8M
ixed
Pews
ey P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity13
3
1262
8586
522
1686
5221
6M
ixed
Burb
age
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
148
1262
8786
522
1886
5221
8M
ixed
King
s Lo
dge
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
387
1262
8986
522
2286
5222
2M
ixed
Wal
wayn
e Co
urt S
choo
lCo
mm
unity
274
1262
9086
522
2386
5222
3M
ixed
Bowe
rhill
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
349
1262
9186
522
2586
5222
5M
ixed
Bith
am B
rook
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
267
1262
9286
522
2686
5222
6M
ixed
Char
ter P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity27
5
1262
9386
522
2786
5222
7M
ixed
Newt
own
Com
mun
ity P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity23
5
1262
9486
522
2886
5222
8M
ixed
Que
en's
Cres
cent
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
346
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 100
1311
1386
522
3086
5223
0M
ixed
Trow
brid
ge L
ongm
eado
w Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity13
6
1262
9686
530
0086
5300
0M
ixed
All C
anni
ngs
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d11
9
1262
9786
530
0286
5300
2M
ixed
Asht
on K
eyne
s Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
186
1263
0286
530
1386
5301
3M
ixed
Box
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d16
9
1263
0386
530
1586
5301
5M
ixed
Chris
t Chu
rch
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Con
trolle
d Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
399
1263
0486
530
1786
5301
7M
ixed
Britf
ord
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Con
trolle
d Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
55
1263
0586
530
1886
5301
8M
ixed
Broa
d Hi
nton
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
108
1263
0686
530
1986
5301
9M
ixed
Broa
d To
wn C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d49
1263
0786
530
2086
5302
0M
ixed
St N
ichol
as C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
VC
Prim
ary
Scho
ol, B
rom
ham
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
86
1263
0886
530
2186
5302
1M
ixed
St M
ary's
Bro
ught
on G
iffor
d Vo
lunt
ary
Cont
rolle
d Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
54
1263
0986
530
2286
5302
2M
ixed
Bulfo
rd C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d24
7
1263
1086
530
2386
5302
3M
ixed
St K
atha
rine'
s CE
(VC)
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d70
1263
1286
530
3086
5303
0M
ixed
St D
unst
an C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d34
7
1263
1386
530
3586
5303
5M
ixed
Cher
hill C
ofE
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d18
7
1263
1486
530
3686
5303
6M
ixed
Chirt
on C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry C
ontro
lled
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d33
1263
1586
530
3886
5303
8M
ixed
Chris
tian
Mal
ford
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
84
1263
1686
530
4086
5304
0M
ixed
Cole
rne
CofE
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d21
6
1263
1786
530
4586
5304
5M
ixed
St S
amps
on's
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Jun
ior S
choo
lVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d23
1
1263
1886
530
4786
5304
7M
ixed
Croc
kerto
n Co
fE P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
86
1263
1986
530
4886
5304
8M
ixed
Crud
well C
ofE
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d95
1263
2086
530
4986
5304
9M
ixed
Collin
gbou
rne
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d10
0
1263
2286
530
5686
5305
6M
ixed
Sout
hbro
om C
ofE
Juni
or S
choo
lVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d24
4
1263
2386
530
6186
5306
1M
ixed
Durri
ngto
n Al
l Sai
nts
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry C
ontro
lled
Infa
nts'
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d13
0
1263
2486
530
6386
5306
3M
ixed
Durri
ngto
n Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd C
ontro
lled
Juni
or S
choo
lVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d21
0
1263
2586
530
7186
5307
1M
ixed
Figh
elde
an S
t Mich
ael's
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
98
1263
2686
530
7886
5307
8M
ixed
Gra
fton
CofE
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d31
1263
2786
530
8686
5308
6M
ixed
Hedd
ingt
on C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d30
1263
2886
530
8886
5308
8M
ixed
Hilp
erto
n Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Con
trolle
d Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
145
1263
2986
530
9086
5309
0M
ixed
Holt
Volu
ntar
y Co
ntro
lled
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d11
6
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 101
1263
3086
530
9186
5309
1M
ixed
Hulla
vingt
on C
ofE
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d12
3
1263
3186
530
9486
5309
4M
ixed
Keev
il Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
96
1263
3286
530
9686
5309
6M
ixed
King
ton
St M
ichae
l Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
113
1263
3386
531
0086
5310
0M
ixed
Laco
ck C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d69
1263
3486
531
0286
5310
2M
ixed
Lang
ley
Fitz
urse
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
114
1263
3586
531
0486
5310
4M
ixed
Lea
and
Gar
sdon
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
104
1263
3786
531
1086
5311
0M
ixed
Lydi
ard
Milli
cent
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
209
1263
3886
531
1786
5311
7M
ixed
Mal
mes
bury
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
391
1263
3986
531
2386
5312
3M
ixed
St M
ary's
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd In
fant
Sch
ool,
Mar
lbor
ough
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
132
1263
4386
531
3486
5313
4M
ixed
Newt
on T
ony
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry C
ontro
lled
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d33
1263
4486
531
3586
5313
5M
ixed
North
Bra
dley
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
176
1263
4586
531
4086
5314
0M
ixed
Oak
sey
CofE
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d95
1263
4686
531
4186
5314
1M
ixed
Oar
e Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
74
1263
4786
531
4386
5314
3M
ixed
Ogb
ourn
e St
Geo
rge
and
St A
ndre
w Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd C
ontro
lled
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d85
1263
4986
531
4986
5314
9M
ixed
Pres
hute
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
194
1263
5086
531
5086
5315
0M
ixed
St M
ary's
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
, Pur
ton
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
326
1263
5186
531
5886
5315
8M
ixed
Harn
ham
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd C
ontro
lled
Juni
or S
choo
lVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d29
7
1263
5286
531
5986
5315
9M
ixed
Seag
ry C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d58
1263
5386
531
6086
5316
0M
ixed
St G
eorg
e's
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
ol, S
emin
gton
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
68
1263
5486
531
6186
5316
1M
ixed
Shal
bour
ne C
ofE
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d29
1263
5586
531
6286
5316
2M
ixed
Shaw
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Con
trolle
d Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
185
1263
5686
531
6386
5316
3M
ixed
Sher
ston
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
182
1263
5786
531
6486
5316
4M
ixed
Shre
wton
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
117
1263
5986
531
6686
5316
6M
ixed
Sout
hwick
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
149
1263
6086
531
7086
5317
0M
ixed
Stav
erto
n Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Con
trolle
d Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
216
1263
6186
531
7286
5317
2M
ixed
Stra
tford
-sub
-Cas
tle C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry C
ontro
lled
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d13
4
1263
6286
531
7486
5317
4M
ixed
Sutto
n Ve
ny C
ofE
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d15
7
1263
6486
531
7686
5317
6M
ixed
St M
ark's
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd J
unio
r Sch
ool,
Salis
bury
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
372
1263
6686
531
8686
5318
6M
ixed
Urch
font
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
103
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 102
1263
6786
531
9086
5319
0M
ixed
St J
ohn'
s Co
fE S
choo
lVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d10
5
1263
6886
531
9186
5319
1M
ixed
The
Min
ster
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
215
1263
6986
531
9286
5319
2M
ixed
Wes
tbur
y Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd J
unio
r Sch
ool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
272
1263
7086
531
9386
5319
3M
ixed
Wes
tbur
y Le
igh
CofE
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d39
2
1263
7186
531
9986
5319
9M
ixed
Win
sley
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry C
ontro
lled
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d13
8
1263
7286
532
0186
5320
1M
ixed
Win
terb
ourn
e Ea
rls C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d17
8
1263
7386
532
0386
5320
3M
ixed
St B
arth
olom
ew's
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
ol, W
ootto
n Ba
sset
tVo
lunt
ary
aide
d28
4
1263
7486
532
0586
5320
5M
ixed
War
min
ster
Sam
bour
ne C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry C
ontro
lled
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d16
3
1263
7586
532
0786
5320
7M
ixed
Dilto
n M
arsh
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
162
1263
7786
532
1686
5321
6M
ixed
St P
eter
's Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Con
trolle
d Ju
nior
Sch
ool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
184
1263
7986
532
2086
5322
0M
ixed
Min
ety
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d98
1263
8086
532
2286
5322
2M
ixed
St B
arna
bas
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Sch
ool,
Mar
ket L
avin
gton
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
102
1263
8286
532
2986
5322
9M
ixed
Coom
be B
isset
t Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
85
1263
8386
532
3086
5323
0M
ixed
Dint
on C
ofE
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d99
1263
8586
532
3286
5323
2M
ixed
Land
ford
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
40
1263
8886
532
3986
5323
9M
ixed
St J
ohn'
s Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
, Tisb
ury
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
87
1263
9086
532
4286
5324
2M
ixed
Brin
kwor
th E
arl D
anby
's Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
yVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d16
5
1263
9186
532
4386
5324
3M
ixed
Gre
at B
edwy
n Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd S
choo
lVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d19
5
1316
5686
532
4486
5324
4M
ixed
By B
rook
Val
ley
CofE
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d12
1
1263
9286
533
0086
5330
0M
ixed
St M
ichae
l's C
ofE
Aide
d Pr
imar
yVo
lunt
ary
aide
d12
5
1263
9486
533
0686
5330
6M
ixed
Bayd
on S
t Nich
olas
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
105
1263
9586
533
0886
5330
8M
ixed
Bish
ops
Cann
ings
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d16
0
1263
9686
533
1686
5331
6M
ixed
Chap
man
slade
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Aid
ed P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
91
1263
9786
533
1886
5331
8M
ixed
Chilto
n Fo
liat C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d84
1263
9886
533
1986
5331
9M
ixed
St P
eter
's Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
, Chi
ppen
ham
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
265
1264
0086
533
3086
5333
0M
ixed
Derry
Hill
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d20
3
1264
0186
533
3186
5333
1M
ixed
St P
eter
's Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Aid
ed P
rimar
y Sc
hool
, Dev
izes
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
92
1264
0286
533
4486
5334
4M
ixed
Fore
st a
nd S
andr
idge
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
193
1264
0386
533
5286
5335
2M
ixed
Heyt
esbu
ry C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d72
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 103
1264
0486
533
5586
5335
5M
ixed
Idm
iston
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Aid
ed P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
72
1264
0586
533
6286
5336
2M
ixed
St A
ndre
w's
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
ol, L
aver
stoc
kVo
lunt
ary
aide
d15
7
1264
0686
533
6686
5336
6M
ixed
Mor
gan'
s Va
le a
nd W
oodf
alls
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d99
1264
0786
533
7286
5337
2M
ixed
Nom
ansla
nd a
nd H
ampt
worth
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d10
6
1264
1086
533
8186
5338
1M
ixed
Rush
all C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry A
ided
Sch
ool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
81
1264
1186
533
8386
5338
3M
ixed
Saru
m S
t Pau
l's C
ofE
(VA)
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d19
8
1264
1386
533
8786
5338
7M
ixed
St M
artin
's Vo
lunt
ary
Aide
d Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
153
1264
1486
533
8886
5338
8M
ixed
Seen
d Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d10
8
1264
1686
533
9686
5339
6M
ixed
St T
hom
as a
Bec
ket C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Aid
ed P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
48
1264
1786
534
0086
5340
0M
ixed
Wes
t Ash
ton
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d78
1264
1886
534
0186
5340
1M
ixed
Daun
tsey
's (A
ided
) Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d15
8
1264
1986
534
0286
5340
2M
ixed
Whi
tepa
rish
All S
aint
s Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
104
1264
2086
534
0586
5340
5M
ixed
Win
ters
low
CofE
(Aid
ed) P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
191
1264
2186
534
0686
5340
6M
ixed
Woo
dbor
ough
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d14
8
1264
2286
534
0786
5340
7M
ixed
Woo
dfor
d Va
lley
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Aid
ed S
choo
lVo
lunt
ary
aide
d15
4
1264
2386
534
1286
5341
2M
ixed
Chris
t The
Kin
g Ca
thol
ic Sc
hool
, Am
esbu
ryVo
lunt
ary
aide
d26
2
1264
2486
534
1886
5341
8M
ixed
St J
osep
h's
Cath
olic
Prim
ary
Scho
ol, M
alm
esbu
ryVo
lunt
ary
aide
d10
7
1264
2586
534
2586
5342
5M
ixed
St O
smun
d's
Cath
olic
Prim
ary
Scho
ol, S
alisb
ury
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
208
1264
2986
534
3086
5343
0M
ixed
St J
ohn'
s Ca
thol
ic Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
, Tro
wbrid
geVo
lunt
ary
aide
d30
9
1264
3086
534
3586
5343
5M
ixed
War
dour
Cat
holic
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d74
1264
3186
534
3786
5343
7M
ixed
St P
atric
k's C
atho
lic P
rimar
y Sc
hool
, Cor
sham
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
197
1264
3486
534
4886
5344
8M
ixed
Bem
erto
n St
Joh
n Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d18
3
1264
3586
534
4986
5344
9M
ixed
Broa
d Ch
alke
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
168
1264
3686
534
5086
5345
0M
ixed
Gre
at W
ishfo
rd C
ofE
(VA)
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d12
6
1264
3886
534
5386
5345
3M
ixed
Chilm
ark
and
Font
hill B
ishop
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d10
5
1264
3986
534
5486
5345
4M
ixed
Sem
ley
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d12
5
1264
4186
534
5686
5345
6M
ixed
The
Holy
Trin
ity C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry A
ided
Sch
ool,
Gre
at C
heve
rell
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
132
1264
4286
534
5786
5345
7M
ixed
Som
erfo
rds'
Wal
ter P
owel
l VA
CE P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
49
1264
4486
534
5986
5345
9M
ixed
Hind
on C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
ol, S
t Mar
ys a
nd S
t Joh
n's
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
35
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 104
1264
4586
534
6086
5346
0M
ixed
Alde
rbur
y an
d W
est G
rimst
ead
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d18
0
1264
4686
534
6186
5346
1M
ixed
Kenn
et V
alle
y Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d77
1337
7586
534
6286
5346
2M
ixed
Ames
bury
Arc
her P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity14
0
1341
3386
534
6386
5346
3M
ixed
Whi
tesh
eet C
ofE
VA P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
91
1349
7786
534
6586
5346
5M
ixed
Wyly
e Va
lley
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Vol
unta
ry A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d12
6
1349
9286
534
6686
5346
6M
ixed
The
Man
or C
E VC
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d26
6
1303
8886
534
6786
5346
7M
ixed
Chur
chfie
lds,
The
Villa
ge S
choo
lVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d11
5
1312
1586
534
6886
5346
8M
ixed
Ames
bury
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Con
trolle
d Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
216
1332
3386
534
6986
5346
9M
ixed
Five
Lan
es P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
114
1351
4286
534
7086
5347
0M
ixed
Wilto
n an
d Ba
rford
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y co
ntro
lled
168
1351
7786
534
7186
5347
1M
ixed
Lyne
ham
Prim
ary
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
382
1354
8486
534
7286
5347
2M
ixed
Belle
field
Prim
ary
and
Nurs
ery
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d25
6
1319
6986
540
0086
5400
0M
ixed
Abbe
yfie
ld S
choo
lCo
mm
unity
947
1341
9986
540
0186
5400
1Bo
ysW
yver
n Co
llege
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
510
1264
4786
540
0686
5400
6M
ixed
The
Traf
alga
r Sch
ool a
t Dow
nton
Com
mun
ity48
7
1264
4886
540
1386
5401
3M
ixed
The
Geo
rge
War
d Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity10
89
1264
5286
540
6486
5406
4M
ixed
Mal
mes
bury
Sch
ool
Com
mun
ity12
29
1264
5486
540
6686
5406
6M
ixed
The
Cors
ham
Sch
ool A
Visu
al A
rts C
olle
geCo
mm
unity
1397
1264
5586
540
6786
5406
7M
ixed
Woo
tton
Bass
ett S
choo
lCo
mm
unity
1510
1264
5786
540
6986
5406
9M
ixed
The
Clar
endo
n Co
llege
Com
mun
ity13
12
1264
5886
540
7086
5407
0M
ixed
The
Ston
ehen
ge S
choo
lCo
mm
unity
753
1264
5986
540
7186
5407
1M
ixed
Avon
Val
ley
Colle
geCo
mm
unity
715
1264
6086
540
7286
5407
2M
ixed
War
min
ster
Kin
gdow
nCo
mm
unity
1398
1264
6286
540
7586
5407
5M
ixed
The
John
of G
aunt
Sch
ool
Com
mun
ity12
83
1264
6886
545
1186
5451
1G
irls
St E
dmun
d's
Chur
ch o
f Eng
land
Girl
s' Sc
hool
and
Spo
rts C
olle
geVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d78
0
1264
7286
545
3786
5453
7M
ixed
St L
aure
nce
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
cont
rolle
d11
94
1264
7386
546
1086
5461
0M
ixed
St J
osep
h's
Cath
olic
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d35
5
1264
7486
552
0086
5520
0M
ixed
Aloe
ric P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Foun
datio
n36
8
1264
7586
552
0186
5520
1M
ixed
Down
ton
CofE
VA
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d23
6
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 105
1264
7686
552
0286
5520
2M
ixed
King
s Pa
rk P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Foun
datio
n34
1
1264
7886
552
0486
5520
4M
ixed
Sain
t Edm
und'
s Ro
man
Cat
holic
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d19
6
1264
7986
552
0586
5520
5M
ixed
Frog
well P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Foun
datio
n36
0
1264
8086
552
0686
5520
6M
ixed
Stud
ley
Gre
en P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Foun
datio
n19
2
1264
8186
552
0786
5520
7M
ixed
St G
eorg
e's
Cath
olic
Prim
ary
Scho
ol, W
arm
inst
erVo
lunt
ary
aide
d15
3
1264
8286
552
0886
5520
8M
ixed
St M
ary's
RC
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d25
7
1264
8386
552
0986
5520
9M
ixed
Paxc
roft
Prim
ary
Scho
olFo
unda
tion
274
1264
8486
552
1086
5521
0M
ixed
Win
gfie
ld C
ofE
Prim
ary
Scho
ol (V
A)Vo
lunt
ary
aide
d73
1264
8686
552
1286
5521
2M
ixed
Sutto
n Be
nger
Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd A
ided
Prim
ary
Scho
olVo
lunt
ary
aide
d12
9
1264
8786
552
1386
5521
3M
ixed
Holy
Trin
ity C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Sch
ool,
Caln
eVo
lunt
ary
aide
d20
8
1264
8886
552
1486
5521
4M
ixed
St J
osep
h's
Cath
olic
Prim
ary
Scho
ol, D
evize
sVo
lunt
ary
aide
d22
3
1264
8986
552
1586
5521
5M
ixed
Ludg
ersh
all C
astle
Prim
ary
Scho
olFo
unda
tion
252
1264
9086
552
1686
5521
6M
ixed
Pitto
n Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Aid
ed P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
110
1264
9186
552
1786
5521
7M
ixed
Zouc
h Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Foun
datio
n24
4
1264
9286
552
1886
5521
8M
ixed
Clar
endo
n Ju
nior
Sch
ool
Foun
datio
n30
3
1264
9386
552
1986
5521
9M
ixed
Clar
endo
n In
fant
s' Sc
hool
Foun
datio
n28
9
1264
0986
552
2286
5522
2M
ixed
Rowd
e Ch
urch
of E
ngla
nd V
olun
tary
Aid
ed P
rimar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
211
1263
8986
552
2486
5522
4M
ixed
All S
aint
s VA
Cof
E Pr
imar
y Sc
hool
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
166
1262
5886
552
2586
5522
5M
ixed
The
Aven
ue S
choo
l and
Ear
ly Ye
ars
Cent
reFo
unda
tion
305
1264
9586
554
0086
5540
0M
ixed
St A
ugus
tine'
s Ca
thol
ic Co
llege
Volu
ntar
y ai
ded
946
1264
9786
554
0286
5540
2M
ixed
Lavin
gton
Sch
ool
Foun
datio
n66
8
1264
9886
554
0386
5540
3M
ixed
Pews
ey V
ale
Scho
olFo
unda
tion
358
1264
9986
554
0486
5540
4M
ixed
Shel
don
Scho
olFo
unda
tion
1726
1265
0086
554
0586
5540
5M
ixed
St J
ohn'
s Sc
hool
and
Com
mun
ity C
olle
geFo
unda
tion
1478
1265
0186
554
0686
5540
6M
ixed
The
John
Ben
tley
Scho
olFo
unda
tion
1188
1265
0386
554
0886
5540
8M
ixed
Brad
on F
ores
t Sch
ool
Foun
datio
n12
04
1265
0686
554
1186
5541
1M
ixed
Deviz
es S
choo
lFo
unda
tion
1178
1265
0786
554
1286
5541
2G
irls
Sout
h W
ilts G
ram
mar
Sch
ool f
or G
irls
Foun
datio
n95
4
1265
0886
554
1386
5541
3Bo
ysBi
shop
Wor
dswo
rth's
Gra
mm
ar S
choo
lVo
lunt
ary
aide
d87
6
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 106
1265
0986
554
1486
5541
4M
ixed
Hard
enhu
ish S
choo
lFo
unda
tion
1520
1265
1086
554
1586
5541
5M
ixed
Mat
rave
rs S
choo
lFo
unda
tion
1047
1265
1186
554
1686
5541
6M
ixed
Cast
ledo
wn S
choo
lFo
unda
tion
463
1264
6986
554
1886
5541
8M
ixed
Salis
bury
Hig
h Sc
hool
Foun
datio
n84
4
1265
4686
570
0286
5700
2M
ixed
Rowd
efor
d Sc
hool
Com
mun
ity S
pecia
l12
4
1265
5086
570
0786
5700
7Bo
ysDo
wnla
nd S
choo
lCo
mm
unity
Spe
cial
63
1265
5186
570
0886
5700
8M
ixed
Exet
er H
ouse
Spe
cial S
choo
lCo
mm
unity
Spe
cial
96
1265
5286
570
0986
5700
9M
ixed
St N
ichol
as S
choo
lCo
mm
unity
Spe
cial
70
1265
5386
570
1086
5701
0M
ixed
Lark
rise
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
Spe
cial
79
1265
5786
570
1586
5701
5M
ixed
Sprin
gfie
lds
Scho
olCo
mm
unity
Spe
cial
65
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 107
2008
Num
ber o
f pu
pils
takin
g fre
e sc
hool
mea
ls
2008
% o
f pup
ils
takin
g fre
e sch
ool
mea
ls
2008
Num
ber o
f pu
pils
know
n to
be
elig
ible
for f
ree
scho
ol m
eals
2008
% o
f pup
ils
know
n to
be
eligi
ble f
or fr
ee
scho
ol m
eals
2009
NOR
2009
Num
ber o
f pu
pils
takin
g fre
e sc
hool
mea
ls
2009
% o
f pup
ils
takin
g fre
e sch
ool
mea
ls
2009
Num
ber o
f pu
pils
know
n to
be
elig
ible
for f
ree
scho
ol m
eals
2009
% o
f pup
ils
know
n to
be
eligi
ble f
or fr
ee
scho
ol m
eals
No o
f app
eals
held
No o
f app
eals
uphe
ldNo
of a
ppea
ls pe
ndin
g
225.
624
6.1
396
174.
320
5.1
10
0
146.
318
8.0
235
218.
922
9.4
179.
319
10.4
178
105.
611
6.2
11
0
10.
23
0.7
425
20.
55
1.2
111
0
2613
.226
13.2
208
188.
720
9.6
169.
017
9.6
178
2212
.429
16.3
196.
034
10.7
322
3510
.951
15.8
2910
.631
11.3
274
3512
.847
17.2
21
0
305.
642
7.8
549
366.
642
7.7
30
0
850
.09
56.3
93
33.3
333
.3
105.
911
6.5
166
84.
811
6.6
11
0
2714
.834
18.7
180
4323
.943
23.9
73.
77
3.7
196
73.
67
3.6
82
0
2619
.032
23.4
132
2922
.037
28.0
00.
00
0.0
400
0.0
00.
0
00.
00
0.0
144
00.
00
0.0
30
0
10.
91
0.9
105
00.
00
0.0
30
0
34.
33
4.3
702
2.9
22.
9
37.
33
7.3
412
4.9
24.
9
10.
41
0.4
236
00.
00
0.0
24.
42
4.4
280
0.0
00.
0
32.
73
2.7
114
32.
63
2.6
21.
03
1.5
207
31.
43
1.4
115.
112
5.6
213
125.
612
5.6
613
.66
13.6
Scho
ol n
ow c
lose
d
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 108
53.
05
3.0
169
105.
913
7.7
2916
.634
19.4
192
3317
.248
25.0
11.
01
1.0
982
2.0
22.
0
32.
35
3.8
104
87.
79
8.7
41.
84
1.8
213
83.
88
3.8
21.
32
1.3
157
10.
61
0.6
31.
63
1.6
197
105.
110
5.1
2316
.025
17.4
141
2316
.328
19.9
225.
231
7.4
421
276.
443
10.2
1915
.819
15.8
107
1715
.917
15.9
103.
519
6.7
279
155.
421
7.5
33
0
146.
418
8.2
220
125.
512
5.5
125.
812
5.8
214
188.
418
8.4
229.
434
14.5
236
4920
.864
27.1
10
0
136.
314
6.7
191
168.
416
8.4
00
1
2210
.636
17.4
207
2512
.140
19.3
208.
224
9.8
241
229.
123
9.5
10
0
83.
98
3.9
224
156.
715
6.7
913
.69
13.6
685
7.4
710
.3
95.
512
7.3
152
53.
38
5.3
1612
.018
13.5
160
1811
.324
15.0
74.
77
4.7
151
42.
64
2.6
51.
38
2.1
377
102.
710
2.7
20
0
114.
011
4.0
269
165.
916
5.9
82.
38
2.3
347
72.
07
2.0
259.
425
9.4
266
186.
829
10.9
2910
.533
12.0
237
2912
.235
14.8
2912
.339
16.6
226
2711
.936
15.9
133.
813
3.8
342
164.
716
4.7
33
0
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 109
4734
.655
40.4
123
5645
.558
47.2
43.
44
3.4
117
32.
63
2.6
10.
51
0.5
175
63.
46
3.4
31.
85
3.0
170
74.
19
5.3
215.
321
5.3
401
194.
723
5.7
72
1
00.
00
0.0
500
0.0
00.
0
21.
92
1.9
113
21.
82
1.8
00.
01
2.0
480
0.0
00.
0
22.
36
7.0
811
1.2
11.
2
00.
00
0.0
540
0.0
00.
0
135.
314
5.7
221
146.
318
8.1
811
.48
11.4
747
9.5
79.
5
5515
.971
20.5
336
6619
.684
25.0
42.
15
2.7
192
84.
28
4.2
13.
06
18.2
442
4.5
24.
5
11.
21
1.2
820
0.0
00.
0
00.
00
0.0
206
00.
00
0.0
208.
720
8.7
223
146.
317
7.6
00.
00
0.0
891
1.1
11.
1
11.
11
1.1
981
1.0
11.
0
00.
00
0.0
105
21.
92
1.9
249.
832
13.1
227
2912
.845
19.8
53.
87
5.4
132
86.
19
6.8
136.
213
6.2
196
105.
111
5.6
00.
02
2.0
950
0.0
22.
1
13.
21
3.2
281
3.6
13.
6
00.
00
0.0
312
6.5
26.
5
106.
910
6.9
144
139.
013
9.0
32.
63
2.6
108
65.
66
5.6
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 110
54.
15
4.1
125
43.
24
3.2
00.
00
0.0
971
1.0
11.
0
43.
54
3.5
114
32.
64
3.5
11.
42
2.9
875
5.7
66.
9
32.
63
2.6
116
65.
26
5.2
43.
84
3.8
964
4.2
44.
2
10.
52
1.0
206
00.
00
0.0
256.
425
6.4
392
307.
732
8.2
1813
.617
12.9
144
139.
014
9.7
00.
00
0.0
350
0.0
00.
0
21.
12
1.1
179
21.
14
2.2
22
0
22.
12
2.1
903
3.3
33.
3
11.
42
2.7
782
2.6
22.
6
22.
40
0.0
792
2.5
22.
5
00.
00
0.0
192
00.
00
0.0
51.
56
1.8
335
82.
410
3.0
144.
715
5.1
278
124.
316
5.8
11.
71
1.7
602
3.3
23.
3
11.
51
1.5
784
5.1
45.
1
00.
00
0.0
330
0.0
00.
0
42.
25
2.7
186
52.
76
3.2
20
0
52.
75
2.7
169
31.
83
1.8
00.
02
1.7
124
00.
03
2.4
74.
714
9.4
159
138.
224
15.1
188.
324
11.1
217
2310
.627
12.4
1410
.416
11.9
132
2015
.221
15.9
00.
00
0.0
172
00.
01
0.6
51.
38
2.2
366
61.
68
2.2
00.
00
0.0
990
0.0
00.
02
20
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 111
76.
77
6.7
114
1513
.215
13.2
73.
37
3.3
222
83.
68
3.6
3814
.049
18.0
247
3313
.444
17.8
215.
421
5.4
385
256.
531
8.1
53.
65
3.6
120
54.
26
5.0
52.
84
2.2
179
31.
74
2.2
10
0
93.
212
4.2
273
82.
912
4.4
84.
914
8.6
173
148.
123
13.3
159.
317
10.5
170
1911
.219
11.2
168.
722
12.0
178
1810
.127
15.2
00.
00
0.0
106
21.
92
1.9
65.
96
5.9
987
7.1
77.
1
22.
42
2.4
920
0.0
11.
1
66.
16
6.1
106
76.
68
7.5
00.
00
0.0
361
2.8
12.
8
66.
96
6.9
858
9.4
89.
4
21.
25
3.0
151
21.
33
2.0
73.
67
3.6
210
83.
88
3.8
20
0
21.
72
1.7
133
32.
33
2.3
64.
86
4.8
117
76.
07
6.0
00.
00
0.0
112
00.
00
0.0
53.
15
3.1
168
31.
83
1.8
11.
12
2.2
961
1.0
11.
0
22.
42
2.4
873
3.4
33.
4
62.
36
2.3
255
135.
114
5.5
00.
00
0.0
203
00.
00
0.0
1617
.416
17.4
8615
17.4
1517
.4
105.
213
6.7
177
105.
611
6.2
34.
23
4.2
665
7.6
57.
6
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 112
34.
23
4.2
685
7.4
57.
4
53.
25
3.2
161
138.
115
9.3
66.
14
4.0
102
65.
97
6.9
10.
91
0.9
125
00.
01
0.8
44.
95
6.2
931
1.1
33.
2
94.
515
7.6
212
41.
98
3.8
4126
.843
28.1
139
4330
.956
40.3
00.
01
0.9
107
10.
91
0.9
00.
00
0.0
400
0.0
00.
0
00.
00
0.0
820
0.0
00.
0
42.
58
5.1
160
63.
87
4.4
11.
01
1.0
109
00.
00
0.0
00.
00
0.0
174
00.
00
0.0
10.
71
0.7
148
32.
03
2.0
00.
01
0.6
153
10.
73
2.0
72.
712
4.6
262
186.
918
6.9
87.
59
8.4
108
87.
49
8.3
167.
718
8.7
200
115.
512
6.0
51.
66
1.9
310
51.
65
1.6
00.
00
0.0
690
0.0
00.
0
52.
55
2.5
196
52.
68
4.1
137.
113
7.1
165
1710
.317
10.3
00.
00
0.0
177
10.
61
0.6
00.
03
2.4
115
00.
02
1.7
00.
00
0.0
115
00.
00
0.0
21.
62
1.6
124
10.
82
1.6
43.
04
3.0
138
10.
73
2.2
00.
00
0.0
460
0.0
00.
0
25.
74
11.4
402
5.0
512
.5
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 113
105.
611
6.1
161
42.
55
3.1
22.
62
2.6
654
6.2
46.
2
64.
310
7.1
183
179.
320
10.9
50
3
1516
.516
17.6
8214
17.1
1417
.1
32.
44
3.2
121
54.
15
4.1
4215
.843
16.2
213
4521
.145
21.1
10.
97
6.1
116
65.
26
5.2
188.
328
13.0
202
2311
.426
12.9
87.
012
10.5
9815
15.3
1515
.3
3118
.531
18.5
131
2116
.021
16.0
123.
113
3.4
343
102.
912
3.5
4517
.648
18.8
245
5120
.856
22.9
202.
128
3.0
954
222.
329
3.0
397.
643
8.4
447
296.
529
6.5
367.
436
7.4
522
295.
629
5.6
10
5
423.
963
5.8
1103
292.
654
4.9
221.
822
1.8
1252
151.
229
2.3
513.
779
5.7
1399
453.
280
5.7
11
4
432.
854
3.6
1509
503.
355
3.6
564.
387
6.6
1322
735.
510
17.
60
01
385.
045
6.0
762
385.
042
5.5
283.
941
5.7
703
395.
547
6.7
302.
150
3.6
1435
292.
071
4.9
856.
687
6.8
1242
806.
483
6.7
303.
838
4.9
761
202.
633
4.3
11
0
393.
353
4.4
1223
292.
442
3.4
44
0
154.
228
7.9
361
164.
423
6.4
82.
211
3.0
337
82.
48
2.4
114.
711
4.7
209
52.
45
2.4
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 114
5716
.765
19.1
386
6216
.174
19.2
105.
111
5.6
192
126.
320
10.4
4111
.449
13.6
359
4713
.163
17.5
6634
.481
42.2
200
6432
.078
39.0
95.
99
5.9
135
107.
416
11.9
31.
23
1.2
279
93.
29
3.2
103.
613
4.7
266
217.
927
10.2
00.
00
0.0
640
0.0
00.
0
21.
62
1.6
127
21.
62
1.6
62.
98
3.8
205
62.
96
2.9
104.
511
4.9
215
94.
29
4.2
4618
.363
25.0
247
249.
742
17.0
00.
00
0.0
803
3.8
33.
8
20.
84
1.6
278
51.
85
1.8
41.
33
1.0
301
20.
78
2.7
62.
16
2.1
279
82.
98
2.9
188.
522
10.4
223
198.
524
10.8
10.
61
0.6
177
63.
46
3.4
278.
931
10.2
285
238.
123
8.1
80.
815
1.6
967
131.
319
2.0
172.
519
2.8
682
192.
826
3.8
133.
615
4.2
342
113.
212
3.5
543.
176
4.4
1772
522.
952
2.9
312.
140
2.7
1498
251.
733
2.2
221.
986
7.2
1206
715.
988
7.3
423.
549
4.1
1189
342.
948
4.0
574.
880
6.8
1223
736.
089
7.3
40.
46
0.6
975
60.
67
0.7
30.
33
0.3
890
20.
22
0.2
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 115
402.
669
4.5
1531
452.
963
4.1
555.
381
7.7
1059
635.
910
19.
5
255.
437
8.0
527
356.
635
6.6
536.
385
10.1
818
627.
688
10.8
1411
.314
11.3
131
139.
913
9.9
1015
.913
20.6
6516
24.6
1827
.7
1616
.717
17.7
9015
16.7
1516
.7
1521
.417
24.3
6615
22.7
1624
.2
1113
.911
13.9
779
11.7
1215
.6
00.
00
0.0
670
0.0
00.
0
AF
_JU
N16
10R
06.x
ls
Page 116
AFJUN1610R021.doc
ADMISSION FORUM - 16 JUNE 2010 Update report: Progress on The Application of the In Year Fair Access Protocol As per the February 2010 report the In Year Fair Access protocol continues to be applied through four In Year Access panels. The key focus of the protocol and the panels continues to be secondary school placements at this time. Current Issues Again as per February the current issues faced in relation to the protocol are about maintaining a fair and equitable distribution of placements for vulnerable students. In the central area for example out of the seven secondary schools serving the central area two are in an Ofsted category and one is an Academy in its second year of creation. Effectively this means that because of the restrictions on admissions for schools in either of the above situations we have only four secondary schools available to distribute vulnerable pupils. What is most concerning is that the Academy, while not accepting a fair proportion of vulnerable students at this time, is the highest exporter of vulnerable students which places additional pressures on those schools who contribute well to the In Year protocol. Additionally, with an increased proportion of vulnerable students needing to be placed and a smaller number of places available, all of the secondary schools not in one of the identified categories above are fast reaching saturation point and in some cases, in some year groups, the agreed admission number of three pupils above the published number has been reached or even exceeded. Overall the total number of permanently excluded pupils is reducing and if this pattern is sustained in the medium to long term the pressure on schools to accept high level need children will be reduced. Add to this the developments around behaviour partnerships and the work with schools to “consume their own smoke” which may also pay dividends in the longer term. Pressures in the South of the county are not significant at this time and the protocol is working well. In the northern area and in particular in the West the protocol is also working well but there are specific pressures around those schools in the Banbury area although here the Academy is a full and equal player in relation to the protocol.
Agenda Item 10
Page 117
AFJUN1610R021.doc
Resourcing In Year Admissions As you may recall during its first year of application in year admissions were supported through the creation of a fund top sliced from schools Devolved Schools Grant (DSG). This fund was created to support schools to integrate children where it was considered important for a school to provide additional support. The application of this fund worked well and was fully spent by the end of the academic year. This funding is available for a second year and will continue to be used to support both the schools and children to integrate into our schools. At this stage however it is not known whether there will be any further funding available at the end of the current year. Barry Armstrong Area Service Manager, Central Inclusion, Access and Engagement
Page 118