Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course The IPWG7 Training Course Session 5: NWP applications and Assimilation Data Assimilation Kazumasa Aonashi Meteorological

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course The IPWG7 Training Course Session 5: NWP applications and Assimilation Data Assimilation Kazumasa Aonashi Meteorological Research Institute/ [email protected]
  • Slide 2
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training courseOutlineIntroduction Why do we need data assimilation technique in the first place? What is Data Assimilation? Ensemble-Based Variational Assimilation Method (EnVA) to Incorporate MWI TB into a Cloud- Resolving Model Summary & Discussion
  • Slide 3
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course Observed data Definition of Data Assimilation NWP forecasts Assimilation Other Observations Analysis data Analysis technique in which the observed information is accumulated into the model state by taking advantage of consistency constraints with the model equations
  • Slide 4
  • Satellite Observation (TRMM) InfraredImager SST, Winds Cloud Particles Frozen Precip. Snow Aggregates Melting Layer Rain Drops Radiation from Rain Scattering by Frozen Particles Radar Back scattering from Precip. Scattering Radiation 00 Microwave Radiometer Cloud Top Temp. 10m 3 mm-3cm GH 2cm GH GHz Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 5
  • Current Retrievals vs. User needs Current Situation: Precip retrievals from each sensors User Needs: The optimal retrieval using all sensors Ret. Alg. Sat. Ret. Alg. Ret. Alg. Ret. Alg. Sat. Precip. Sat. Retrieval Alg. Precip. Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 6
  • Future directions of retrieval algorithms Retrieved variables (Precip, Temp, Qv, etc) In situ Obs. Satellite Radar Satellite MWR We can use data assimilation techniques. Constraint (Governing equations) Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 7
  • Complementary Property of Upper-Air Sonde Data to Satellite observation Weighting of AMSU-B B3 B4 B5 n GPS Occultation Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 8
  • NWP can induce plausible precip from other variables (Ps, T, U,V, etc) Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course Hourly precip forecasts for FT=1-6hr
  • Slide 9
  • Data Assimilation Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 10
  • Major NWP models at JMA MSM: Meso-Scale Model 5km (3600x2880km) / 50leves top 22km 15 hour forecasts 00,06,12,18UTC 33 hour forecasts 03,09,15,21UTC Data Assimilation: 4DVAR GSM: Global Spectral Model TL959 0.1875deg 20km / 60levels top 0.1hPa 84 hour forecasts 216 hour forecasts 12UTC Data assimilation: 4DVAR Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 11
  • Data used in the assimilation cycles (Jun 22, 2011) Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course Observation data: Non-uniform Different from NWP variables
  • Slide 12
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course Observed data Definition of Data Assimilation NWP forecasts Assimilation Other Observations Analysis data Analysis technique in which the observed information is accumulated into the model state by taking advantage of consistency constraints with the model equations
  • Slide 13
  • DA is important for NWP DA is important for NWP. T213L30 Revision of cumulus parameterization T213L40 Revision of cumulus parameterization Revision of cloud MODIS AMVs Revision of radiation TL319L40 4D-Var SSM/I and TMI VarBC QuikSCAT ATOVS BT 3D-Var CSR Revision of VarBC Revision of RTM SSMIS, ASCAT TL959L60 Reduced Grid TL959L60 Courtesy of Y. Sato (JMA) 500 hPa Geopotential Height RMSE (NH) Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 14
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course Evolution of DA technique DA started with interpolation of the observed data. Interpolation is not appropriate in practice. Use of first guess of previous NWP forecast (Optimal Interpolation) Statistical approach to produce analysis data: Modeling the error of the observation, the NWP first guess, and constraints. Find optimal values that minimize the analysis error. Sophisticated assimilation techniques 4DVAR Ensemble-based assimilation
  • Slide 15
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course O/I for single point
  • Slide 16
  • O/I for multi-dimensional case Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 17
  • Example of O/I Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course 1 st Guess (Prev. Fcst) Observation Filtering d=Y-H(X) Interpolation X = Wd Analysis Obs error Covariance Fcst error Covariance
  • Slide 18
  • Nov. 19, 2014 Statistical Approach Modeling of the errors Observation error o =Y-H(Xt) where observation (Y) and the model counterpart H(X) First guess & analysis error f =Xf Xt, a =Xa-Xt where Xf,Xa are First guess & analysis of the model state IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 19
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course Statistical Approach Bayes rule (conditional PDF) Conditional PDF of X given obs. Y: If errors are Gaussian: The maximum likelyhood state is the one minimizes the cost function J: (3DVAR)
  • Slide 20
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course Simple Example We have a temperature observation T o with STD o, given first guess T f with STD f. The maximum likelyhood state is the one minimizes the cost function J: TfTf ToTo TaTa
  • Slide 21
  • Basic Idea of 4DVAR Generalization of 3DVAR for observations distributed in time: Use model equations as constraints: Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 22
  • Basic Idea of Ensemble-based assimilation Obs. Analysis ensemble mean T=t0T=t1T=t2 Analysis w/ errorsFCST ensemble mean Estimating first-guess error with Ensemble forecasts Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 23
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course Ensemble-Based Variational Assimilation Method (EnVA) EnVA Incorporation of MWI TB into a Cloud-Resolving Model
  • Slide 24
  • 2014/1/15 GPM PI WS GOAL: Ensemble-based Variational Assimilation System to incorporate MWR TBs into CRMs SST, Winds Cloud Particles Frozen Precip. Snow Aggregates Melting Layer Rain Drops Scattering Radiation 00 MWR TBs MWR TBs are functions of various atmospheric and surface variables 3 mm-3cm Water Vapor JMANHM Saito et al,2001) Resolution: 5 km Grids: 400 x 400 x 38 Ensemble-based Variational Assim System
  • Slide 25
  • Cloud-Resolving Model used JMANHM Saito et al,2001) Resolution: 5 km Grids: 400 x 400 x 38 Time interval: 15 s Explicitly forecasts 6 species of water substances Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 26
  • Ensemble-based Assimilation System Obs. T=t0T=t1 T=t2 Ensemble forecasts Mean of Ensemble forecasts Calculation of analysis of Ensemble mean 26 Calculation of analysis of error cov. and Ensemble member.
  • Slide 27
  • EnVA: min. cost function in the Ensemble forecast error subspace Minimize the cost function with non-linear Obs. term. Assume the analysis error belongs to the Ensemble forecast error subspace Lorenc, 2003): Forecast error covariance is determined by localization Cost function in the Ensemble forecast error subspace Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 28
  • Why Ensemble-based method?: 200km 10km Heavy Rain AreaRain-free Area To estimate the flow-dependency of the error covariance Ensemble forecast error corr. of PT (04/6/9/22 UTC) Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 29
  • Why Variational Method ? Why Variational Method ? MWI TBs are non-linear function of various CRM variables. TB becomes saturated as optical thickness increases: TB depression mainly due to frozen precipitation becomes dominant after saturation. To address the non- linearity of TBs Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 30
  • Detection of the optimum analysis Detection of the optimum by minimizing where is diagonalized with U eigenvectors of S Approximate the gradient of the observation with the finite differences about the forecast error: To solve non-linear min. problem, we performed iterations. Following Zupanski (2005), we calculated the analysis of each Ensemble members, from the Ensemble analysis error covariance. Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 31
  • Case 2004/6/9/22 UTC) TY CONSON TMI TB19 RAM (mm/hr) Assimilate TMI TBs Assimilate TMI TBs (10v, 19v, 21v) at 22UTC (10v, 19v, 21v ) at 22UTC Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 32
  • Ensemble Forecasts & RTM code Ensemble forecasts 100 members started with perturbed initial data at 04/6/9/15 UTC (FG) Geostrophically-balanced perturbation (Mitchell et al. 2002) plus Humidity RTM: Guosheng Liu (2004) One-dimensional model (Plane-parallel) Mie Scattering (Sphere) 4 stream approximation Ensemble mean (FG) Rain mix. ratio TB19v cal. from FG Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 33
  • TB19v from TMI and CRM outputs FG First guess DE After DEC ND: NoDE+ EnVA CN DE+ EnVA TMI Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 34
  • RAM and Rain mix. ratio analysis (z=930m) FGDE RAM NDCN Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 35
  • RH(contours) and W(shades) along N-S FGDE CNND M Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 36
  • Hourly Precip. forecasts (FT=0-1 h) 22-23Z 9th RAM DE CN ND FG Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 37
  • Hourly Precip. Forecasts (FT=3-4 h) 01-02Z 10th RAM DE CN ND FG Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 38
  • Summary Why do we need data assimilation technique in the first place? What is Data Assimilation? Ensemble-Based Variational Assimilation Method (EnVA) to Incorporate MWI TB into a Cloud- Resolving Model Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 39
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course Any questions?
  • Slide 40
  • Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course EnVA to incorporate MWR TBs into a CRM Problems in EnVA for CRM Displacement error correction Application results
  • Slide 41
  • Problem in EnVA (1): Displacement error Large scale displacement errors of rainy areas between the MWI observation and Ensemble forecasts Presupposition of Ensemble assimilation is not satisfied in observed rain areas without forecasted rain. AMSRE TB18v (2003/1/27/04z) Mean of Ensemble Forecast (2003/1/26/21 UTC FT=7h Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 42
  • Presupposition of Ensemble-based assimilation Obs. Analysis ensemble mean T=t0T=t1T=t2 Analysis w/ errorsFCST ensemble mean Ensemble forecasts have enough spread to include (Obs. Ens. Mean) Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 43
  • Ensemble-based assimilation for observed rain areas without forecasted rain Ensemble-based assimilation for observed rain areas without forecasted rain Obs. Analysis ensemble mean T=t0T=t1T=t2 Analysis w/ errors FCST ensemble mean Assimilation can give erroneous analysis when the presupposition is not satisfied. Signals from rain can be misinterpreted as those from other variables Displacement error correction is needed! Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 44
  • Displacement error correction (DEC)+EnVA Methodology Application results for Typhoon CONSON (T0404) Application results for Typhoon CONSON (T0404)Case Assimilation Results Impact on precipitation forecasts Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 45
  • Displaced Ensemble variational assimilation method In addition to, we introduced to assimilation. The optimal analysis value maximizes Assimilation results in the following 2 steps: 1) DEC scheme to derive from 2)EnVA scheme using the DEC Ensembles to derive from Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 46
  • Problem in EnVA (1): Displacement error Large scale displacement errors of rainy areas between the MWI observation and Ensemble forecasts Presupposition of Ensemble assimilation is not satisfied in observed rain areas without forecasted rain. AMSRE TB18v (2003/1/27/04z) Mean of Ensemble Forecast (2003/1/26/21 UTC FT=7h Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 47
  • Fig. 1: CRM Ensemble Forecasts Displacement Error Correction Ensemble-based Variational Assimilation MWI TBs Assimilation method Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 48
  • DEC scheme: min. cost function for d Bayes Theorem can be expressed as the cond. Prob. of Y given We assume Gaussian dist. of where is the empirically determined scale of the displacement error. We derived the large-scale pattern of by minimizing (Hoffman and Grassotti,1996) Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 49
  • Detection of the large-scale pattern of optimum displacement We derived the large-scale pattern of from, following Hoffman and Grassotti (1996) We transformed into the control variable in wave space, using the double Fourier expansion. We used the quasi-Newton scheme (Press et al. 1996) to minimize the cost function in wave space. we transformed the optimum into the large-scale pattern of by the double Fourier inversion. Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course
  • Slide 50
  • Fig. 1: CRM Ensemble Forecasts Displacement Error Correction Ensemble-based Variational Assimilation MWI TBs Assimilation method Nov. 19, 2014 IPWG7 training course