Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11/17/2017
1
Mike MitchellU.S. EPA, Region 4
Stormwater UpdateNovember 16, 2017
Presentation Outline2
Stormwater Permitting Update
eReporting Update
Long-Term Stormwater Planning
Green Infrastructure Program Update
Emerging Issue – Residual Designation Authority
Region 4 Activities
Construction Stormwater
Industrial Stormwater
MS4s – MS4 General Permit Remand Rule
Stormwater Permitting Update3
11/17/2017
2
Construction Stormwater4
The 2012 CGP expired on Feb. 16, 2017 and the new 2017 CGPwent into effect the same day
2017 CGP is similar to 2012 CGP: includes effluent limitations inthe form of requirements for erosion and sediment controls, andpollution prevention controls, and requirements for self-inspections,corrective actions, staff training, and a SWPPP
Other notable changes: Requires cover or appropriate temporary stabilization for all inactive
stockpiles Requires waste containers to have lids or cover when not in use
Requires controls to minimize exposure of building materials containingPCBs to precipitation and stormwater
Requires more stringent stabilization deadlines for sites that disturbmore than 5 acres at any one time
Construction Stormwater5
The National Association of Homebuilders (NAHB)petitioned for review of the 2017 CGP in February,followed by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) inMay Petitions consolidated in the DC Circuit
Resources update: New flow-chart for determining permit coverage
Updated SWPPP template
Updated inspection and corrective action report templates
Industrial Stormwater6
Current 2015 MSGP went into effect on June 4, 2015
A group of environmental NGOs petitioned for review the MSGP in June2015 Petitions consolidated in the Second Circuit
Settlement agreement reached in July 2016
As part of settlement agreement, EPA is funding a study by the NationalResearch Council (NRC) to inform potential changes in the next MSGP Suggest improvements to the current MSGP benchmarking monitoring
requirements
Evaluate the feasibility of numeric retention standards (such as volumetric controlstandards for a percent storm size or standards based on percentage ofimperviousness)
Identify the highest priority industrial facilities/subsectors for consideration ofadditional discharge monitoring
11/17/2017
3
MS4 General Permit Remand Rule
Background
Ninth Circuit (EDC v. EPA, 2003) found deficiencies in the Phase IIstormwater regulations regarding the procedures to be used for providingcoverage to small MS4s under general permits
The court vacated the relevant portions of the Phase II regulations, andremanded to EPA to fix the deficiencies:
1. Lack of permitting authority review:
“In order to receive the protection of a general permit, the operator of asmall MS4 needs to do nothing more than decide for itself what reduction indischarges would be the maximum practical reduction.”
“No one will review that operator's decision to make sure that it wasreasonable, or even good faith.”
2. Lack of public participation in permit process:
MS4 General Permit Remand Rule
Key Aspects of Final Remand Rule
Allows permitting authorities to choose between 2 alternative general permit types
1. Comprehensive General Permit, or
2. Two-Step General Permit
Can choose whichever type of permit works best for its needs, and can changeapproaches in subsequent permit terms
This is a procedural rule - no changes are made to the substantive federalrequirements for small MS4s
MS4 General Permit Remand Rule
Key Aspects of Final Remand Rule
All permits must be written with terms and conditions that are“clear, specific, and measurable” Which may be expressed as narrative, numeric, or other types of requirements
Requirement applies to permit terms and conditions established for 6 minimumcontrol measures, evaluation and reporting requirements, and water quality-based requirements
EPA has published a series of documents with examples of different types ofprovisions from existing permits that are clear, specific, and measurable
Compliance with final rule expected by issuance of next smallMS4 general permit, if general permits are used
11/17/2017
4
Clear Requirements Requirements are expressed in a manner that establishes
certainty as to what specific actions the permittee isexpected to take to meet the MS4 permit standard
Avoid permit requirements with caveat language, such as “iffeasible”, “if practicable”, “to the maximum extentpracticable”, and “as necessary”
Use mandatory words such as “must”, and avoid non-mandatory words such as “should” or “the permittee isencouraged to …”
MS4 General Permit Remand Rule
Specific Requirements
Requirements that are clearly defined or identified, and include a level ofdetail that explains the level of effort needed to comply with the MS4permit standard
Permitting authority has discretion as to the level of specificity in the permit Verbatim adoption of minimum control measure requirements would not be
considered specific
Specificity may change in subsequent permits
Increased specificity does not necessarily mean that the permit is morestringent A permit can be specific and still leave flexibility to the MS4 to determine
exactly how it will fulfill permit requirements
MS4 General Permit Remand Rule
Measurable Requirements Requirements incorporate a quantifiable or definite compliance objective that can be assessed in a
straightforward manner
What this means is that the requirement answers a few questions:
What needs to happen?
Who needs to do it?
How much do they need to do?
When do they need to get it done?
Where it is to be done?
Typically, an objective parameter is needed to define the necessary level of effort, result expected,performance standard, or similar measurement – but does not mean that the requirement needs tobe expressed as a numeric effluent limit (the following are examples of measureable goals)
Conduct inspections of active construction sites once per week until final stabilization is met
Clean 25 % of the catch basins in your service area every year
The first 1 inch of precipitation must be retained on site
MS4 General Permit Remand Rule
11/17/2017
5
https://www.epa.gov/npdes/municipal-sources-resources
MS4 General Permit Remand Rule
eReporting Update14
eReporting Rule
OECA published eReporting rule in October 2015
Purpose is to replace NPDES paper-based reporting with electronic reporting directlyfrom permittees or from the permitting authority, such as Discharge Monitoring Reports,information from permit applications for individual permits and NOIs for general permits,and annual reports
This data will be incorporated into EPA’s national NPDES data system (NPDES-ICIS)
eReporting Rule includes data elements for both Phase I and II MS4s
State and EPA permitting authorities have until December 2020 to start electronicallysubmitting required MS4 data elements
The Phase II MS4 data elements were based on the pre-MS4 Remand Rule regulations
Now that the MS4 Remand Rule has been promulgated, the corresponding Phase II MS4data elements no longer reflect the current regulations
States cannot rely on the current set of Phase II MS4 data elements to comply with botheReporting Rule and Remand Rule requirements
11/17/2017
6
Other Updates on eReporting16
EPA is forming an EPA-State MS4 Technical Workgroupto assist in defining the applicable MS4 “dataelements” Currently soliciting interested state participants Will be used to collect feedback on the draft changes to the
eReporting data elements to reflect the new MS4 remandrule
EPA is exploring how to make its NPDES eReporting Tool(NeT) for the CGP and MSGP available to states Interested states should contact Amanda Pruzinsky at
Long-Term Stormwater Planning17
Connection to Integrated Planning
18
Integrated Planning - a voluntary opportunity for municipalitiesto propose to meet CWA requirements sequencing wastewater and stormwater projects in a way that allows the highest
priority environmental projects to come first, and
potentially using innovative solutions, such as green infrastructure
• regulatory standardsor
• requirements
It is not ameans tochange
11/17/2017
7
Scope of an Integrated Plan
http://civilengineerspk.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/001.jpg
May include National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitrequirements for:
Wastewater treatment plants MS4s
19
A proactive strategy to addressflooding and stormwater pollutionby synchronizing stormwaterprojects with the community’slong-term vision and plans.
Efficiently synchronize stormwatermanagement with capital improvementplans, comprehensive plans and masterplans
Use green infrastructure to treatstormwater as a resource to waterlandscaping and recharge drinking watersupplies
Explore asset management programs,sustainable financing and other strategiesthat build capacity to support reliableinfrastructure
20
What Is A Long-Term Stormwater Plan
Save money by aligning stormwaterupgrades with other infrastructure anddevelopment projects
Reduce flooding and pollution with reliableinfrastructure in order to attract and sustainbusinesses to the community
Build an attractive community for residentsto eat, live, work, play, fish and canoe intheir own backyard
Provide certainty and predictability todevelopers and opens up new opportunitiesfor financing
What are the benefits of a Long-TermStormwater Plan?
Reliable
infrastructure
Cost savings
Flood risk
reduction
Neighborhood
amenities
New
Businesses
Recreational
opportunities
Improved
resiliency
21
11/17/2017
8
Provide an online stormwater planning toolkit to help communities develop long-termstormwater plans. Help communities identify federal resources and tools that can helpthem develop their plans.
Provide Technical Assistance to Communities – work with 5 communities to test tool anddevelop plans.
Outline key elements and process for developing long-term stormwater plans socommunities invest in development that aligns with their community identity,sustainability and resiliency to reduce costs.
22
“Guide”
“Toolkit”
“Technical Assistance”
A Three-Pronged Approach
Developed based on sustained engagement with key partners including states,communities, business/industry groups, academia and nongovernmentalorganizations.
Community-Based Solutions for Stormwater Management:A Guide for Voluntary Long-Term Planning (Draft)
Set Goals DriversStormwater
Systems
CommunityInvolvement
Alternatives ProposalsMeasuring
Success
The draft guide is available online toencourage continued dialogue and
feedback.
① Assess Where You are Now
② Analyze Opportunities ③ Move Toward Implementation
It includes 3 steps:
23
Steps & Elements of the Guide Correspond to theElements of the Integrated Planning Framework
24
Draft Long-term Stormwater Planning Guide Integrated Planning Framework
Step 1 - AssessWhere You AreNow
Element 1 – Identify the goals Element 1 – Description of water quality, human health,and regulatory issues
Element 2 – Describe water quality and human health issues to beaddressed in the plan
Element 3 – Describe existing stormwater systems and theirperformance
Element 2 – Description of existing wastewater andstormwater systems and current performance
Step 2 -AnalyzeOpportunities
Element 4 – Stakeholder communication and involvement Element 3 – Stakeholder communication andinvolvement
Element 5 – Identify, evaluate and select stormwater managementalternatives based on identified goals and objectives
Element 4 – Identifying, evaluating, and selectingalternatives and proposing implementation schedules
Step 3 - MoveTowardImplementation
Element 6 – Document a process for proposing investments andimplementation schedules
Element 7 – Document a process for evaluating theperformance/success of the plan’s projects.
Element 5 – Measuring success - evaluation ofmonitoring data, pilot studies
What's Next? Build It ...Communicate It ...Refine it
Element 6 – Improvements to the Plan (adaptivemanagement)
11/17/2017
9
Initial Mockup of Toolkit
The Stormwater Toolkit walks the user through the steps to develop a long-term stormwater plan. The stepscorrespond to those outlined in the Guide.
25
Burlington, IA
Chester, PA
Hattiesburg, MS
Rochester, NH
EPA is collaborating with five communities to help develop long term plans.
Santa Fe, NM
Building Capacity in Communities26
The five communities were interested in pursuing similar goals for their long term stormwater plan.
Develop Asset Management Program
Manage Flooding
Sustainably Finance a Stormwater Program
Create and Implement Stormwater Development Standards and educate developers
Integrate Stormwater into Downtown Redevelopment areas and other Economic Development Plan
Pursue Stormwater Opportunities in Transportation Projects
Improve Water Quality and Manage Water Holistically
Increase Collaboration Throughout the Local Watershed
Increase the resiliency to urban heat and water demand
27
Example Community Goals
11/17/2017
10
Green Infrastructure ProgramUpdate
28
2017 Green Infrastructure Webcast Series
Quarterly webcasts cover a variety ofgreen infrastructure topics. Visit our websiteto view archived webcasts and register forupcoming webcasts:
https://www.epa.gov/greeninfrastructure
EPA STAR Grants: Moving GreenInfrastructure Forward (March)
2016 Campus RainWorks Winners (May)
Exploring the Link Between GreenInfrastructure and Air Quality (August)
Teach, Learn, Grow: The Value of GreenInfrastructure in Schools (October)
Growing New Jobs With Green Infrastructure(November)
29
2017 Campus RainWorks Challenge
EPA’s sixth annual Campus RainWorksChallenge is a collegiate designcompetition that seeks to: Engage with the next generation of
stormwater management professionals
Foster a multi-disciplinary dialogue aboutthe challenges associated with stormwatermanagement, and potential solutions.
Explore real-world scenarios for theapplication of cutting edge greeninfrastructure practices
Showcase the environmental, economic,and social benefits of green infrastructure
Learn more at:
https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/campus-rainworks-challenge-0
30
Tomorrow’s problem solvers
Today’s scholars
Register for the 2017Campus RainWorks Challenge!
September 1-30
11/17/2017
11
Emerging Issue: Residual DesignationAuthority (RDA)
31
Challenges to Use of RDA32
Several lawsuits and a petition calling on EPA todesignate currently unregulated stormwater dischargesas needing NPDES permits, called Residual DesignationAuthority (RDA), are underway.
Actions involve MS4s and other entities (commercial,industrial, institutional, high density residential)
Litigation has potential to establish importantboundaries on when EPA must designate and whatfactors are relevant in making the decision.
Current Litigation33
In the Ninth Circuit and District Court in California, a challenge to EPA’sdenial of a petition to designate commercial, industrial, and institutional(CII) stormwater discharges in two sub watersheds in the LA area. UPDATE:
In the Fourth Circuit and District Court of Maryland, a challenge to EPA’sdenial of a petition to designate CII discharges in a subwatershed inBaltimore City and Baltimore County
In the First Circuit Court of Appeals (New England), a challenge to DistrictCourt rulings in Rhode Island and Massachusetts that held that a decision toapprove a state’s TMDL does not constitute an designation determinationfor stormwater sources identified as possible sources.
11/17/2017
12
Pending RDA Petitions or Designations34
A petition to designate Los Alamos County and LosAlamos National Laboratory in New Mexico
A petition to designate municipalities in the Inland Baysarea in Delaware
Designation of government entities on Guam
Designation of the City of Moscow, ID and University ofIdaho
Region 4 Activities35
MS4 Permitting Priorities
Technical Assistance
MS4 Training and Outreach
THANK YOU!QUESTIONS?
Mike [email protected]
Websites: Green Infrastructure
www.epa.gov/greeninfrastructure MS4s
www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-municipal-sources Construction Stormwater
www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-construction-activities Industrial Stormwater
www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-industrial-activities