24
NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool

(the representatives perspective)

Cat ForsythUK Safety Reps Committee

Page 2: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Basic elements of a good RCA investigation

WHAThappened

HOW ithappened

WHY ithappened

Unsafe Act (CDP/SDP)

Human Behaviour

Contributory Factors

Solution Development & Feedback

Page 3: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Care DeliveryProblem(CDP)

i. care deviated beyond safe limits of practice and

ii the deviation had a direct or indirect effect on the eventual adverse outcome for the patient

Problems that arise in the process of care, usually actions or omissions by staff:

Identifying the problem(s)

Page 4: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Service DeliveryProblem(SDP)

SDP refers to those acts or omissions that are identified during the analysis of the patient safety incident, but are not associated with direct provision of care.

They are generally associated with decisions, procedures and systems that are part of the whole process of service delivery.

Identifying the problem(s) cont’d

Page 5: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

What is Human Error

“We all make errors irrespective of how much training and experience we possess or how motivated we are to do it right.

(in Reducing error and influencing behaviour - HSG48)

Page 6: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee
Page 7: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Incident Contributory Factors

•Patient factors•Individual factors•Task factors•Communication factors•Team & Social factors•Education & Training factors•Equipment and Resource factors•Working Condition factors•Organisational & management factors

Page 8: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Types of Violation

•Routine – involve regularly performed short-cuts between tasks, which are accepted locally, and sometimes by management. •e.g not checking identities of long term patients because they are well knownReasoned Violations- deviation from protocol where violation is for good reason •Reckless Violations- are deliberate deviations from protocol, usually harm not intended•Malicious Violations- are deliberate and include acts of sabotage

Page 9: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Updating Staff / Feedback

Staff should be kept updated on the progress of an investigation

The chair and local manager should determine how best to provide feedback

Page 10: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

RCA Techniques

Timeline•chronology event of what happened

•Easy to understand data and inter-relations

•Forms the backbone of the investigation

Page 11: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Fishbone AnalysisContributory factors affecting the performance of individuals

Page 12: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Five Whys

–Best suited to non-complex problems–Each use of ‘Why?’ takes you closer to a root cause–Not compulsory to use five – stop when no further benefit is gained!

Page 13: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Change Analysis

–A comparative technique: what was the change that may have caused adverse event?–Enables you to compare a process when it is well defined and functioning effectively - but then is found to not function well i.e. when performance problems have been identified

Page 14: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

Barrier Analysis

–Human action barriers•Checking drug dosage before administering

–Administrative barriers•Protocols and procedures, supervision, training

–Physical barriers•Insulated pipes, lead lined aprons

–Natural barriers of place and time•Isolation of MRSA patients

Page 15: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

The Incident Decision Tree

•Developed by National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA), National Clinical Assessment Authority (NCAA), NHS Confederation, Royal Colleges and trade unions•Based on a model developed for the aviation industry•Aimed to support managers considering action following an incident and highlighting alternative to suspension

Page 16: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee
Page 17: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee
Page 18: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

“Here is Edward Bear,coming

downstairs now, bump, bump, bump,

on the back of his head, behind

Christopher Robin. It is, as far as

he knows, the only way of coming

downstairs, but sometimes he feels

that there really is another way, if only

he could stop bumping for a moment

and think of it”

A.A. Milne 1926

Illustration E.H.Shepard 192614

Page 19: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

http://www.msnpsa.nhs.uk/idt2/(jg0xno55baejor55uh1fvi25)/index.aspx

Page 20: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

GETTING THE BALANCE RIGHT

Page 21: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

CHANGING THE CULTURE

Page 22: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE

Page 23: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

SEE CLEARLY THE TASK AHEAD

Page 24: NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective) Cat Forsyth UK Safety Reps Committee

contact

[email protected]