Upload
buinga
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nuclear Astrophysics
K. E. Rehm
Physics Division
Argonne National Laboratory
2x50 minutes for (13.7±0.13)x109
years
(a ratio of 1.39x10‐14
!)
EBSS MSU 2011
2
Outline•Why astrophysics?
•The life of a star
•Astrophysical jargon: Big Bang nucleosynthesis, Jeans
criterion, quiescent and
explosive burning, reaction rate, Gamow window,
S‐factor, resonance strength,..
•Examples (p,) reaction in X‐ray bursts
n‐rich nuclei and the r‐process
EBSS MSU 2011
3
LiteratureC. Rolfs & W. Rodney:
Cauldrons in the Cosmos, University of Chicago Press, 1988
C. Iliadis:
Nuclear Physics of Stars, Wiley 2007
I. Thompson and F. Nunes
Nuclear Reactions for Astrophysics, Cambridge Univ. Press 2009
B2FH:
Burbidge,Burbidge,Fowler, Hoyle: Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 15(1957)
Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Physics
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
EBSS MSU 2011
4
Why astrophysics? What is astrophysics?
Forefront science
EBSS MSU 2011
5
Particle Physics
Atomic Physics
Neutrinos 0.7%
Plasma Physics
Cosmology Nuclear Physics
Gravitation
Dark Energy 73.4%
Dark Matter 22.1%
-mass 0.7%
H, He 4.1%
Heavy Elements 0.07%
Neutrino Physics
Astronomical Observations
EBSS MSU 2011
6
Lab/Earth Stars
gravitation 9.81 m/sec2 Black hole
magnetic field 91.4 T 10‐100x109
T
Acc. energy 7x1012
eV 1020
eV
density 22.5 g/cm3 1013
g/cm3
‐flux 1020
/sec 1058
in ~1 s
Whatever stars do, they do it to the extreme
EBSS MSU 2011
7
Nuclear Astrophysics – goals:
•Understanding the birth and death of stars
•Understanding the energy that powers the stars
•Understanding the formation of the elements
EBSS MSU 2011
8
Nuclear Astrophysics - Challenges:•Extremely small cross sections
•backgrounds
•Reactions involving unstable nuclei
Frontiers:•High-current accelerators
•Underground laboratories
•Gas targets
•Radioactive ion beams
•High efficiency detectors
EBSS MSU 2011
9
T ~ 109 K,
t ~ 3 min
1H 0.75
2H 2.5x10‐5
3He 4x10‐5
4He 0.23
7Li 5x10‐9
EBSS MSU 2011
10
Burles, Nollett, Turner, ApJ
EBSS MSU 2011
11
The elements after the Big Bang The elements today
What the stars did for us
EBSS MSU 2011
12
C
C
RGMU
2
53
NkTK23
H
C
mMN
Virial
theorem: 2K + U = 0
Collapse: 2K < ‐U
C
C
H
C
RGM
mkTM 2
533
3/1)43(
C
CC
MR
2/12/3 )4
3()5(CH
J mGkTM
Jeans criterion (1902)
EBSS MSU 2011
13
C
C
RGMU
2
53
NkTK23
H
C
mMN
Virial
theorem: 2K + U = 0
Collapse: 2K < ‐U
C
C
H
C
RGM
mkTM 2
533
3/1)43(
C
CC
MR
2/12/3 )4
3()5(CH
J mGkTM
Jeans criterion (1943)
MJ
= 45M
TK3/2 N‐1/2
For T=3000K and N=6x103
cm‐3
MJ
=105M
EBSS MSU 2011
14
EBSS MSU 2011
15
Two paths to ‘cook’ the elements in stars:Slowly (quiescent)
~(109 years)
Example : the sun
hydrogen helium
Fast (explosive)
~( a few seconds)
Example:Supernova
iron
heavy elements
EBSS MSU 2011
16
Experiments with stable beams and targets:
provide data for BB nucleo-synthesis and quiescent burning scenarios
Need:•High beam intensities
•thick targets, that can tolerate the beams
•low backgrounds
•long runs
EBSS MSU 2011
17
LUNA Gran Sasso
DUSEL
EBSS MSU 2011
18
Experiments with radioactive beams:
provide data for explosive burning scenarios:
Need:•Beams of unstable nuclei (low intensities, contaminants)
•thick targets (to compensate for the intensity)
•long runs
EBSS MSU 2011
19
Targets for experiments with radioactive beams: controlled by stellar abundance pattern
Most reactions induced by:
p,
(16O,12C, n)
EBSS MSU 2011
20
Critical reactions in nuclear astrophysics
(p,)
(novae, rp‐process)
()
(red giants)
(,p)
(rp‐process)
12C + 12C fusion
(supernovae)
(n,)
(r‐process, s‐process)
GT transitions
(supernovae)
(,n)
(s‐process, red giants)
(p,)
(novae)
(,p), (,n), () (p‐process)
EBSS MSU 2011
21
Ap,
(v)
In Nature:
v: Maxwellian distribution
EBSS MSU 2011
22
target A
p,
(with velocity vo )
(vo )
In the laboratory:
EBSS MSU 2011
23
Reactions between Charged Particles(astrophysical reaction rate, Gamow window, S-factor, resonance strength)
Example: 12C(p,13N
Nc : 12C particles/cm3
Np : protons/cm3
v: relative velocity between C and p
Astrophys. reaction rate: r=Nc •Np • v• p
(v)
EBSS MSU 2011
24
Plasma: velocity distribution (v)
v
<v>= (v)•v•(v) dv
(<v> reaction rate per particle pair)
Particle densities Ni :
=Ni weight of a particle
=Ni A/NA NA : Avogadro’s Number
Ni =NA /A
Or, for a multiparticle gas with Xi as a mass fraction:
Ni =NA /A Xi
EBSS MSU 2011
25
Example: particle density in the center of the sun:
~150 g/cm3
Xi =0.73
Np =6.6 1025 particles/cm3
EBSS MSU 2011
26
In normal stellar matter (not in neutron stars)
i (vi )=4vi2( )3/2 exp(- ) (Maxwellian)
<v>= (v1 )(v2 )(vrel )vrel dv1 dv2
v1 =V + m2 /(m1 +m2 )v V : center-of-mass velocity
v2 =V - m1 /(m1 +m2 )v v : relative velocity (v1 -v2 )
<v>= (V)(v) v (v) dv dV
kTm2 kT
mv2
2
EBSS MSU 2011
27
Where:
(V)=4V2( M/(2kT))3/2 exp(- MV2/(2kT))
M=m1 +m2
(v)=4v2(/(2kT))3/2 exp(-v2/(2kT))
=m1 m2 /(m1 +m2 )
<v>= (v)v(v)dv
Because (V)dV=1
EBSS MSU 2011
28
<v>=4( )3/2 v3 (v) exp(- )dv
or
<v>=( )1/2 ( )3/2 (E) E exp(- ) dE
kT
2 kTv
2
2
8
kT1 kT
E
EBSS MSU 2011
29
vN
QREvNNR
2
121212
2112
1)1(
Reactions/(cm3 sec) in a plasma consisting of N1 and N2 particles/cm3
Rate of energy release (MeV/(cm3 sec)
Life time (sec) of particle 1 in a plasma consisting of N2 particles/cm3
Some useful expressions:
Need to measure (v) (or (E))
EBSS MSU 2011
30
Need (E):
Non-resonant cross sections resonant cross sections
EBSS MSU 2011
31
Probability of tunneling through the Coulomb barrier:
P~ exp(-2); 2Z1 Z2 (/Ecm )1/2 ;
in amu, E in keV
EBSS MSU 2011
32
2.1 Non-resonant Reactions:
=/k2 l
lTl 2)12(
at low energies only l=0 collisions contribute:
=/k2|T0 |2 = /k2 (F,G:Coulomb functions)221
oo GF
With asymptotic values (Abramowitz-Stegun):
~ 1/E exp(-2)
Where =Z1 Z2 e2/(v) Sommerfeld parameter
EBSS MSU 2011
33
To eliminate the strong energy dependence, one takes out the trivial factors : e-2/E and defines a new parameter S (S-Factor) which contains the ‘non-trivial’ energy dependence:
=S(E)/E e(-2)
S(E)=E e(2)
EBSS MSU 2011
34
EBSS MSU 2011
35
With S(E) one can rewrite <v>:
<v>=( )1/2 ( )3/2 S(E)exp(-E/kT-b/E1/2) dE
argument of the exponent:
8
kT1
EBSS MSU 2011
36
Maximum of the argument at E0 :
E0 =(bkT/2)2/3 with b=(2)1/2 e2Z1 Z2 /
or
E0 =1.22( )1/3 [keV] Gamow peak26
22
21 TZZ
T6 : temperature in 106 K
EBSS MSU 2011
37
56
22
21 TZZ
System Eo
[keV] [keV] 3He + 3He 21 12.1 49.7
p + 12C 24 12.8 55.4
+ 12C 56 19.6 130.216O + 16O 237 40.4 550.9
Example of Gamow window values
T6
=15 K T=15x106
K
EBSS MSU 2011
38
From C. Angulo
EBSS MSU 2011
39
Example: reactions in the CNO cycle
reaction times long compared to Nuclear reactions occur on stable nuclei
EBSS MSU 2011
40
Increasing the temperature by a factor of 10:
Reaction times are comparable to decay times.
unstable nuclei become part of the reaction network
EBSS MSU 2011
41
2.2 Resonance Reactions
EBSS MSU 2011
42
resonance : Breit-Wigner shape
if = 2k
)12)(12(12
21
JJJ
22 )2/()(
r
fi
EE
J: spin of the resonance
J 1,2 : spin of the particles in the entrance channel
k: wave number
i,f : widths (decay probabilities) in the entrance or exit channel
Er : resonance energy
: total width (i +f +..)
EBSS MSU 2011
43
<v>=( )1/2 ( )3/2 BW E exp(-E/kT) dE
<v>=( )1/2( ) 3/2 Er exp(-Er /kT) BW (E) dE
8
kT1
8
kT1
EBSS MSU 2011
44
BW (E) dE = i f /2)
=22/k2 =
=22/k2
: resonance strength
2k
fi
EBSS MSU 2011
45
<v>=( )3/2 2
exp(-Er /kT)
For several non-overlapping resonances:
<v>=( )3/2 2 i exp(-Ei /kT)
kT2
kT2
High rates for:
1. Large
2. low resonance energies Ei
EBSS MSU 2011
46
spin-parity selection rules, e.g.14O + : 0+, 1-, 2+,3-..17F(5/2+) + p(1/2+): 2+,3+,1-,2-,..
What are the important levels in the compound nucleus (18Ne)? Example: 14O(,p)17F
Angular momentum barrier:
Vint =Z1 Z2 e2/R +2 l(l+1)/(2R2)
tunneling inhibited for higher l
preference for l=0 transitions
EBSS MSU 2011
47
Example I:
X-ray bursts –
Reactions on the surface of a neutron star
EBSS MSU 2011
48
X-ray bursts
~1.5 M
radius ~ 10 km
~ 106-14 g/cm3
T ~ 107 K
donor star
neutron star
accretion disk
normal H, He star
period: hours-100d
distance~ 10-3– 1AU
accumulation rate ~10-8-10-10 M
/y
(50-0.5 kg/cm2/s)
~200 MeV/u
KS 1731-260
D=23 kly
EBSS MSU 2011
49
X-ray Bursts
•~repetition rate hours-days
•duration of ~10 sec
•E=1038 erg/s (sun 1033 erg/s)
EBSS MSU 2011
50
56Ni(p,)57Cu
b
T1/2 (56Ni)=6.1d
EBSS MSU 2011
51
What are the observables? a) Time dependence of the luminosity
EBSS MSU 2011
52
L. Boirin et al.,
A&A 2007
Observables cnt’d:multiplets
EBSS MSU 2011
53
Galloway et al., ApJ 601,466(2004)
Observables cnt’d:‘aging’ effects in X-ray bursts
Observations
in 1997‐98
and in 2000
EBSS MSU 2011
54
Observables cnt’d:Energy shift of Fe-absorption line (ionization)
Nature 420, 51
EBSS MSU 2011
55
Observables cnt’d:Long (‘super’) bursts
Strohmayer & Brown ApJ 566, 1045(2002)
~ 3hrs
Nuclear reactions deeper inside the neutron star
EBSS MSU 2011
56
0 12
3 45 6
7 8
9 10
111213
14
1516
17181920
2122
2324
25262728
2930
3132
33343536
3738
n (0)H (1)
He (2)Li (3)
Be (4) B (5) C (6) N (7)
O (8) F (9)
Ne (10)Na (11)
Mg (12)Al (13)Si (14) P (15)
S (16)Cl (17)
Ar (18)K (19)
Ca (20)Sc (21)
Ti (22)V (23)
Cr (24)Mn (25)
Fe (26)Co (27)
Ni (28)Cu (29)
Zn (30)Ga (31)
Ge (32)As (33)
( )
X-ray bursts and Nuclear PhysicsTypical rp-process reaction network
(p,)
(,p)
+ decay
Need:•Proof of particle stability
•masses
•T1/2 (+)
•Cross sections
EBSS MSU 2011
57
Shock front
atmosphere Sedimentation of the reaction products
Egr /mc2=GMNS /(RNS c2) ~ 0.2
•Relativistic treatment
•Three-dimensional
•Rotations
•Turbulences
•Sedimentation
•‘Ashes’ (e.g. 12C) can burn as well
•Magnetic fields
Theoretical treatment of X-ray bursts
FLASH Center ANL
EBSS MSU 2011
58
Which reactions have been measured?
Direct measurement
Indirect measurement
Under investigation
EBSS MSU 2011
59
0 12
3 45 6
7 8
9 10
111213
14
1516
17181920
2122
2324
25262728
2930
3132
33343536
3738
n (0)H (1)
He (2)Li (3)
Be (4) B (5) C (6) N (7)
O (8) F (9)
Ne (10)Na (11)
Mg (12)Al (13)Si (14) P (15)
S (16)Cl (17)
Ar (18)K (19)
Ca (20)Sc (21)
Ti (22)V (23)
Cr (24)Mn (25)
Fe (26)Co (27)
Ni (28)Cu (29)
Zn (30)Ga (31)
Ge (32)As (33)
( )
X-ray bursts and Nuclear PhysicsTypical rp-process reaction network
(p,)
(,p)
+ decay
Need:•Proof of particle stability
•masses
•T1/2 (+)
•Cross sections
21Na(p,)22Mg
EBSS MSU 2011
60
(p,) reactions
Center of activities with radioactive beams
Mainly resonant
Example 21Na(p,)22Mg (TRIUMF)
S. Bishop et al. PRL90, 162501(2003)
J. d’Auria
et al. PRC69, 065803(2004)
EBSS MSU 2011
61
Gamow windows
EBSS MSU 2011
62
Need 200-900 keV 21Na (T1/2 =22.8 s) beams and hydrogen gas target
Reaction studied as: p(21Na,22Mg)21Na
22Mg
EBSS MSU 2011
63
EBSS MSU 2011
64
EBSS MSU 2011
65
EBSS MSU 2011
66
Conversion from cross section to reaction rate
EBSS MSU 2011
67
Other Recoil Separators for Astrophysics
Used to measure 21Na(p,)22MgDRAGON at TRIUMF ISAC
ARES at Louvain-la-NeuveUsed to measure 19Ne(p,)20Na
DRS at ORNL HRIBFUsed to measure 17F(p,)18Ne
FMA at ANL ATLASUsed to measure 18F(p,)19Ne
Future: SECAR at NSCL
EBSS MSU 2011
68
rp-process
Nuclei involved in Astrophysics
EBSS MSU 2011
69
Example 2:
Nucleosynthesis beyond 56Fe:
(r and s-processes)
Coulomb barrier too high for charged-particle reactions
reactions involving neutrons
from the mass distributions: at least two processes
slow neutron capture (s-process)
rapid neutron capture (r-process)
EBSS MSU 2011
70
Relative abundances as f(A)
~3% of 56Fe
EBSS MSU 2011
71
Where does nature produce neutrons in stars?
Charged-particle reactions 13C(,n)16O Q=2.216 MeV (but 12C(,n)15O Q=-8.508)22Ne(,n)25Mg Q=-0.480 MeV
Cross sections for neutron capture
reactions are usually quite large.
(100-5000 mb)
Shell effects!
EBSS MSU 2011
72
s-process
slow neutron capture process
EBSS MSU 2011
73
s-process
Nuclei involved in Astrophysics
EBSS MSU 2011
74
What neutron flux is needed?
Rate equation for a nucleus A with respect to n- capture:
dNA (t)= -NA (t)/A dt
is the rate at which A is converted into A+1,
i.e. NA Nn <v>=-dNA /dt
A Nn =1/<v>
dtdN A
EBSS MSU 2011
75
n
~1/v <v> ~ constant
~ 100 mb , v ~ 108 cm/sec
Nn ~ 1017 s neutrons/cm3
To have capture times <10y (=•108 s)
Nn > 3x108 neutrons/cm3 (s-process)
EBSS MSU 2011
76
Nuclei with small n
(e.g. closed shell nuclei) have a large
and form a ‘bottleneck’
resulting in the s process abundance peaks.
EBSS MSU 2011
77
EBSS MSU 2011
78
What causes the second peaks?
EBSS MSU 2011
79
The other peaks in the abundance spectra are shifted downward in mass, but can be explained with a similar mechanism: rapid capture of neutrons.
EBSS MSU 2011
80
r-process
s-process
rapid neutron capture process
EBSS MSU 2011
81
For this to happen the n capture has to occur on a much faster time scale: n ~ ms
With Nn ~ 1017
Nn ~ 1020 n/cm3
At which astrophysical sites do we have these neutron densities?
EBSS MSU 2011
82
Price and Rosswog
Where can we get these high neutron densities?
Neutron star mergers
core‐collaps
supernovae
• Site of the r‐process is unknown
•
Properties of nuclei in the r‐process path are unknown
(half‐lives, masses, n‐capture cross sections..)
EBSS MSU 2011
83
EBSS MSU 2011
84
S.Wanajo
EBSS MSU 2011
85
EBSS MSU 2011
86
EBSS MSU 2011
87
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150
GANIL SPEG CSS2
stable indirect
ISOLDE MISTRAL ISOLTRAP
Other Penning traps CPT (ANL) LEBIT (MSU) JYFLTRAP
neutron dripline(FRDM95)
proton dripline(FRDM95)
GSI ESR-SMS ESR-IMS SHIPTRAP
N
Z
Lunney, NIC-IX, 2006
For the r‐process path we need masses of neutron‐rich nuclei
EBSS MSU 2011
88
106 103 100 10-310-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
JYFL COOL
CPT
ESR SMS
ISOLTRAP
ESRIMS
MISTRAL
CSS2
SPEG
rela
tive
unce
rtain
ty
half life (seconds)
See: Lunney, Pearson & Thibault, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 1021
Most accurate mass measurements with Penning traps
EBSS MSU 2011
89
B
• constant axial magnetic field
• particle orbits in horizontal plane
• free to escape axially
mqB
c
How a Penning trap works -1
EBSS MSU 2011
90
How a Penning trap works-2
B
Add an axial harmonic potential to confine particles:
)2
(2
22
2rz
dVV o
EBSS MSU 2011
91
Motion of ions in a Penning trap
picture from http://isoltrap.web.cern.ch/isoltrap/
242
22zcc
)( BvEqF
Solve for equations of motion:
2mdeV
z
Axial oscillations:
Radial motion:
EBSS MSU 2011
92
Magnetic field lines outside the Penning trap
Ions from the Penning trap
zFF
0B
0B
MCP
OrbitalEnergy
LinearEnergy
TOFDetection
Penning trap mass spectrometry
35
40
45
50
55
60
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
Applied Frequency - 1328698.54 Hz
TOF
( s)
Sample TOF spectrum
EBSS MSU 2011
93
Penning traps
CPT at ATLAS
SHIPTRAP
ISOLTRAP
JYVLTRAP
EBSS MSU 2011
94
Need information of n‐rich nuclei in the r‐process path
T1/2
, masses, n‐capture rates
EBSS MSU 2011
95
T1/2
known
Mass known
RIKEN 2010
RIKEN 2011
CARIBU 2011
A very active field – stay tuned!
EBSS MSU 2011
96
r-process
sn1006
rp-process
s-process
Nuclear Physics in Astrophysics
EBSS MSU 2011
97Thanks for listening ‘til the bitter end.