29
1 Running title: 1 Nuclear functions of AGO1 2 Corresponding author details: 3 Jakub Dolata 4 Department of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, 5 Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland 6 Email: [email protected] 7 8 Correspondence may also be addressed to: 9 Artur Jarmolowski 10 Department of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, 11 Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland 12 Email: [email protected] 13 14 15 Novel nuclear functions of Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE1: beyond RNA interference 16 Mateusz Bajczyk, Susheel Sagar Bhat, Lukasz Szewc, Zofia Szweykowska-Kulinska, Artur Jarmolowski* 17 and Jakub Dolata* 18 Department of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Faculty of Biology, 19 Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland 20 21 22 One-sentence summary 23 AGO1 activity is not limited to the cytoplasm and has been found to be associated with the 24 regulation of gene expression in the nucleus and to be tightly associated with chromatin and 25 transcription. 26 Funding 27 This project was supported by the Polish National Science Centre (UMO-2017/25/B/NZ1/00603 to JD, 28 UMO-2013/10/A/NZ1/00557 to AJ, UMO-2016/23/B/NZ9/00862 to ZSK, UMO- 29 2017/27/N/NZ1/00202 to SSB, UMO-2014/13/N/NZ1/00049 to MB, UMO-2015/19/N/NZ1/01997 to 30 LS) and the KNOW Poznan RNA Centre (01/KNOW2/2014). 31 32 Corresponding author email 33 Jakub Dolata: [email protected] 34 Artur Jarmolowski: [email protected] 35 36 37 Plant Physiology Preview. Published on January 3, 2019, as DOI:10.1104/pp.18.01351 Copyright 2019 by the American Society of Plant Biologists https://plantphysiol.org Downloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Nuclear functions of AGO1 · 2019/1/3  · uclear functions of plant AGO proteins 72 were first described for AGO4 (Zilberman et al., 2003) and AGO6 (Zheng et al., 2007; McCue et

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Running title: 1

Nuclear functions of AGO1 2

Corresponding author details: 3

Jakub Dolata 4

Department of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, 5

Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland 6

Email: [email protected] 7

8

Correspondence may also be addressed to: 9

Artur Jarmolowski 10

Department of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, 11

Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland 12

Email: [email protected] 13

14

15

Novel nuclear functions of Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE1: beyond RNA interference 16

Mateusz Bajczyk, Susheel Sagar Bhat, Lukasz Szewc, Zofia Szweykowska-Kulinska, Artur Jarmolowski* 17

and Jakub Dolata* 18

Department of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Faculty of Biology, 19

Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland 20

21

22

One-sentence summary 23

AGO1 activity is not limited to the cytoplasm and has been found to be associated with the 24

regulation of gene expression in the nucleus and to be tightly associated with chromatin and 25

transcription. 26

Funding 27

This project was supported by the Polish National Science Centre (UMO-2017/25/B/NZ1/00603 to JD, 28

UMO-2013/10/A/NZ1/00557 to AJ, UMO-2016/23/B/NZ9/00862 to ZSK, UMO-29

2017/27/N/NZ1/00202 to SSB, UMO-2014/13/N/NZ1/00049 to MB, UMO-2015/19/N/NZ1/01997 to 30

LS) and the KNOW Poznan RNA Centre (01/KNOW2/2014). 31

32

Corresponding author email 33

Jakub Dolata: [email protected] 34

Artur Jarmolowski: [email protected] 35

36

37

Plant Physiology Preview. Published on January 3, 2019, as DOI:10.1104/pp.18.01351

Copyright 2019 by the American Society of Plant Biologists

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

2

38

Introduction 39

Argonaute (AGO) proteins, key factors in the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway, are involved 40

in the regulation of gene expression at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional and translational levels 41

and play roles in genome integrity maintenance (Hutvagner and Simard, 2008; Meister, 2013; 42

Kalantari et al., 2016; Carbonell, 2017; Ma et al., 2017). AGO proteins, found in all eukaryotes 43

(excluding Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as well as in bacteria and archaea (Drinnenberg et al., 2009; 44

Meister, 2013; Swarts et al., 2014), are classified into three paralogous groups: (1) AGO-like proteins, 45

which account for most AGO proteins and are similar to Arabidopsis thaliana AGO1; (2) PIWI-like 46

proteins, homologous to Drosophila melanogaster PIWI and exclusively expressed in animal germ 47

cells; and (3) AGOs expressed in only Caenorhabditis elegans (Hutvagner and Simard, 2008; Zhang et 48

al., 2015; Ma et al., 2017). The number of genes encoding AGO proteins varies among species, 49

ranging from one in Schizosaccharomyces pombe to 27 in C. elegans (Carmell et al., 2002). All AGO 50

proteins are evolutionarily conserved in structure and function (Hock and Meister, 2008), which 51

emphasizes their importance in cellular metabolism and development. 52

In eukaryotes, AGO family proteins possess four characteristic domains: N-terminal, PAZ 53

(PIWI-AGO-Zwille), MID and PIWI (Hutvagner and Simard, 2008; Zhang et al., 2014). The PAZ domain 54

anchors the 3' end of the guide strand of a small RNA (sRNA) duplex (Ma et al., 2004), whereas the 55

MID-PIWI domain creates a binding pocket for the 5’ end of the sRNA duplex guide strand (Boland et 56

al., 2011). Moreover, the PIWI domain shows similarity to RNase H and is essential for target 57

cleavage (Song et al., 2004; Parker et al., 2005). Finally, the N-terminal domain fragment (DUF1785) 58

was recently described as being important for RNA duplex unwinding (Derrien et al., 2018). 59

The AGO proteins mediate posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS). Based on microRNA 60

(miRNA) or small interfering RNA (siRNA) sequence complementarity, RNA-induced silencing complex 61

(RISC) is guided to a target RNA, which leads to its cleavage (predominantly in plants) (Baumberger 62

and Baulcombe, 2005) or translation inhibition (Brodersen et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2010). However, 63

AGO proteins also exhibit an sRNA-independent target recognition mechanism, as suggested for C. 64

elegans, mammalian cells (Leung et al., 2011; Friend et al., 2012) and D. melanogaster (Pinder and 65

Smibert, 2013). In A. thaliana, ten AGO family members are expressed (Vaucheret, 2008; Borges and 66

Martienssen, 2015), with the most prominent being AGO1, the main component of the miRNA-67

guided cytoplasmic RISC. 68

Other members of the AGO family were found to be associated with chromatin and involved 69

in histone modification and DNA methylation in transcriptional gene silencing (reviewed (Castel and 70

Martienssen, 2013; Martienssen and Moazed, 2015). The nuclear functions of plant AGO proteins 71

were first described for AGO4 (Zilberman et al., 2003) and AGO6 (Zheng et al., 2007; McCue et al., 72

2015). A. thaliana AGO4 binds 24-nt siRNAs, which are most likely generated in the nucleus by DCL3 73

in the RNA polymerase IV (RNAPIV) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 2 (RDR2)-dependent 74

pathway (reviewed in (Wendte and Pikaard, 2017). Binding of the siRNA-AGO4 complex to RNA 75

polymerase V (RNAPV) nascent transcripts leads to recruitment of the DNA methyltransferase DRM2 76

and induces de novo DNA methylation (m5C) at specific loci (Wierzbicki et al., 2008; Bohmdorfer et 77

al., 2014; Zhong et al., 2014), leading to transcriptional silencing. The introduction of a methyl group 78

at cytosine residues requires assistance from the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex (Zhu et al., 79

2013) and is accompanied by histone modifications, such as H3 and H4 deacetylation, H3K9 80

methylation (H3K9me) and H3K4 demethylation (reviewed in (Matzke and Mosher, 2014). Similarly, 81 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

3

Arabidopsis AGO6 is related to the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway and may act 82

redundantly (Zheng et al., 2007) or interdependently with (Duan et al., 2015) AGO4. 83

Moreover, Arabidopsis AGO6 exhibits a specific expression pattern (shoot and root 84

meristem) (Havecker et al., 2010; Eun et al., 2011) and participates in the methylation of 85

transcriptionally active transposons (McCue et al., 2015). In S. pombe, the AGO-containing RNA-86

induced transcriptional silencing (RITS) complex is required for the formation of constitutive 87

heterochromatin at pericentromeric regions, stimulating histone H3K9me (Partridge et al., 2002). In 88

C. elegans, the nuclear RNAi pathway is also involved in transcription silencing by promoting H3K9me 89

(Gu et al., 2012), which protects germline cells from transposon activity (Vastenhouw and Plasterk, 90

2004). 91

In worms, AGO family proteins are involved in not only transcriptional suppression but also 92

positive regulation of the transcription of target genes required for spermatogenesis (Conine et al., 93

2013; Seth et al., 2013), and in D. melanogaster, heterochromatin formation is dependent on RNAi 94

and AGO proteins (Pal-Bhadra et al., 2002; Pal-Bhadra et al., 2004). High-throughput RNA-seq and 95

ChIP-seq studies on flies revealed that AGO2 represses transcription by binding to chromatin, but this 96

mechanism could be independent of its catalytic activity (Taliaferro et al., 2013). Moreover, 97

Drosophila AGO2 was found to corelate with transcriptionally active regions of the genome and 98

thought to be involved in the control of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) processivity (Cernilogar et al., 99

2011). In human cells, AGO1 directs transcriptional gene silencing by associating with targeted 100

promoters (Kim et al., 2006). However, it is also involved in the initiation of transcription and 101

interacts directly with RNAPII (Huang et al., 2013). 102

Recent studies show that the action of Arabidopsis AGO1 is not limited to the cytoplasm, as it 103

is also involved in the regulation of gene expression in the nucleus, where it is tightly associated with 104

chromatin (Dolata et al., 2016; Schalk et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018). Here, we summarize recent 105

findings on the nuclear function of Arabidopsis AGO1 and provide ideas and directions for future 106

studies. 107

108

miRNA loading into AGO1 in the nucleus 109

In contrast to animal cells, wherein miRNA biogenesis occurs in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm, 110

in plant cells, miRNA production occurs entirely in the nucleus (Stepien et al., 2017). miRNA/miRNA* 111

duplexes are generated in two cleavage reactions, both of which are catalyzed by the endonuclease 112

DICER-LIKE 1 (DCL1) (Kurihara and Watanabe, 2004). The 2’ OH groups of the 3’ terminal nucleotides 113

of both duplex strands generated in these reactions are methylated by the methylase HUA 114

ENHANCER 1 (HEN1) (Park et al., 2002), which protects them from uridylation and subsequent 115

degradation (Yu et al., 2005). Interestingly, miRNA and miRNA* accumulate asymmetrically, as one 116

strand remains more abundant than the other, and this effect is correlated with the formation of a 117

functional RISC, initiated by AGO1 loading (traditionally thought to occur in the cytoplasm) in which 118

the guide strand (miRNA) is retained inside this effector ribonucleoprotein complex, while the 119

passenger strand (miRNA*) is removed by unwinding and degradation (Iki et al., 2010). 120

Until recently, very little was known about the exact site at which plant sRNA duplex loading 121

occurs. According to previously published data, miRNA/miRNA* duplexes are exported to the 122

cytoplasm by HASTY (HST) (Papp et al., 2003; Park et al., 2005; Pontes et al., 2013), an ortholog of 123

human Exportin 5 (Exp5) (Yi et al., 2005) after completing biogenesis in the nucleus. However, this is 124

not a general mechanism as HST has been reported to be required for the export of only some 125 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

4

specific miRNAs (Park et al., 2005). Additionally, in contradiction to the current model of miRNA 126

biogenesis in plants, data showing that the miRNA biogenesis machinery is necessary for 127

miRNA/miRNA* duplex formation and RISC loading is already present in the nucleus have been 128

reported; Fang and Spector showed that AGO1 and HYL1 (HYPONASTIC LEAVES 1), a double-stranded 129

RNA-binding protein involved in primary transcript (pri-miRNA) processing and loading AGO1 with 130

miRNAs (Vazquez et al., 2004) are present in Dicing bodies (D-bodies) (Fang and Spector, 2007), 131

nuclear structures involved in miRNA biogenesis in plants. HYL1 is an important factor for strand 132

selection during AGO1 loading with miRNAs (Eamens et al., 2009). These observations are considered 133

the first clue indicating that miRNA is loaded to AGO1 in the nucleus. Moreover, Pontes and 134

colleagues showed that DCL1 colocalizes in nuclear D-bodies with HEN1 (Pontes et al., 2013). 135

Recently published data reshaped the miRNA biogenesis model and shed new light on the 136

RISC-loading process in plants. Fascinatingly, a conserved coiled structure, termed an N-coil, deemed 137

to have an important function, was observed at the AGO1 N-terminal domain. The N- and C-terminal 138

regions of the N-coil possess both a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a nuclear export signal 139

(NES), indicating that AGO1 is a nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling protein (Bologna et al., 2018). The 140

prevalent presence of AGO1 in the cytoplasm results from the dominance of the NES over the NLS, 141

which is recognized in the nucleus by the evolutionarily conserved CRM1/EXPORTIN1 (EXPO1) 142

protein (Kudo et al., 1999). However, according to Bologna and coworkers (Bologna et al., 2018), the 143

nuclear localization of AGO1 is necessary for the loading and translocation of most methylated, 144

mature miRNAs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. In the cytoplasm, the NES element on the surface 145

of unloaded AGO1 is unrecognizable, and the exposed NLS results in the translocation of AGO1 to the 146

nucleus. Upon sRNA duplex binding in the nucleus, the NES element is exposed and begins to 147

dominate over the NLS, resulting in the translocation of loaded AGO1 back to the cytoplasm. 148

When present in the nucleus, AGO1 undergoes two major conformational changes during 149

RISC formation. One change occurs before the loading of miRNA/miRNA* duplexes and requires the 150

molecular chaperone Hsp90, which binds to AGO1 in the form of a dimer, and it is a common feature 151

of plant and animal RISC formation process (Iwasaki et al., 2010). In the presence of ATP, Hsp90 152

mediates the conformational opening of AGO1, enabling the fit of sRNA duplexes. In Arabidopsis and 153

tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), cyclophilin 40/SQUINT cochaperones assist Hsp90 in the loading of the 154

siRNA duplex into AGO (Iki et al., 2012). Additionally, unlike in animals, in plants, the RNA duplex 155

binding does not require energy generated from ATP hydrolysis, but hydrolysis is still required 156

afterward for the dissociation of AGO1 from the Hsp90 dimer. Dissociation enforces a second 157

conformational change that promotes unwinding and passenger strand ejection (Rohl et al., 2013). 158

Alteration of the NES element accessibility in AGO1 highly resembles the regulation of AGO4 159

nuclear localization in the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway in plants (Ye et al., 2012). 160

siRNAs must be loaded into the AGO4 protein to form AGO4/siRNA complexes, which occurs in the 161

cytoplasm and triggers conformational changes in AGO4, exposing an initially hidden NLS and 162

consequently allowing translocation to the nucleus. Assembly of the AGO4 complex before entry into 163

the nucleus and selective transport may function as a quality control step before the nuclear RNAi 164

process occurs (Ye et al., 2012), and a similar process could be applicable to the loading of miRNA 165

into AGO1. 166

Bologna and colleagues have shown the importance of the NES for AGO1 function (AGO1 167

with mutated NES could not be transported to the cytoplasm). AGO1-mNES could not rescue the 168

defects in ago1 mutants (Bologna et al., 2018), an observation similar to that made for cleavage 169

activity mutants (Carbonell et al., 2012). However, the significance of AGO1 NLS remains unclear 170 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

5

since AGO-mNLS shows only reduced nuclear localization (Bologna et al., 2018). The molecular 171

phenotype of nuclear AGO1-depleted plants is not known and requires further investigation. 172

173

ARGONAUTE1 regulates protein-coding gene transcription 174

A. thaliana AGO1 has been predominantly studied for its function in the cytoplasm in the PTGS 175

pathway (Morel et al., 2002; Baumberger and Baulcombe, 2005; Brodersen et al., 2008; Li et al., 176

2013; Arribas-Hernandez et al., 2016). Although AGO1 nuclear localization in A. thaliana was 177

reported several years ago (Fang and Spector, 2007; Wang et al., 2011), a function of chromatin-178

associated AGO1 was described much later (Dolata et al., 2016). Data recently published by Liu and 179

colleagues (Liu et al., 2018) provide a model for AGO1 functioning as a positive regulator of 180

transcription in Arabidopsis. Using the Chip-seq approach, the authors identified more than 900 181

AGO1-enriched sites in the A. thaliana genome, which correspond mostly to genomic regions 182

containing transcription start sites (TSS) and transcription termination sites (TTS). 183

This AGO1 enrichment corresponds to the known total RNAPII distribution profile (Adelman 184

and Lis, 2012; Hajheidari et al., 2013). Arabidopsis AGO1 was shown to coimmunoprecipitate with 185

RNAPII complex subunits, and AGO1 depletion in the ago1-36 mutant induced a genome-wide 186

decreased chromatin-associated accumulation of total RNAPII as well as that of its phosphorylated 187

forms (P-Ser5 and P-Ser2), whereas the overall abundance of RNAPII in the cell did not decrease (Liu 188

et al., 2018). These results support previously published data showing a reduced RNAPII occupancy at 189

some MIR genes of the ago1-11 mutant (Dolata et al., 2016). Liu and colleagues suggest that in 190

contrast to the cytoplasmic AGO1 pool, chromatin-associated AGO1 stimulates gene expression by 191

assisting in the recruitment of RNAPII, and the presence of AGO1 on chromatin positively correlates 192

with the expression levels of target genes. Moreover, the levels of nascent and mature transcripts 193

encoded by AGO1-bound genes are predominantly reduced in the ago1-36 mutant (Liu et al., 2018). 194

For more than 50% of AGO1-bound genes, corresponding sRNAs associated with nuclear 195

AGO1 have been identified (Liu et al., 2018). These sRNAs are 21 nt in length and contain the 5’ 196

uridine, which is consistent with the known AGO1-binding preference (Mi et al., 2008) and most 197

likely produced by DCL1 with assistance from HYL1 (Liu et al., 2018). The association of AGO1 with 198

chromatin was previously shown to be impaired in the HYL1-knockout mutant (hyl1-2) or upon 199

alteration of the HYL1 phosphorylation status (in the cpl1-7 mutant) (Dolata et al., 2016). 200

Interestingly, the nuclear fraction of sRNAs bound to AGO1 is depleted in miRNAs and enriched in 201

trans-acting siRNAs (tasiRNAs) (Liu et al., 2018), which coincides with previous observations of AGO1 202

being detected on TAS1 and TAS2 loci but not on the TAS3 gene (Dolata et al., 2016). Finally, both 203

sRNA binding and the ribonuclease activity of AGO1 have been shown to be required for its 204

interaction with chromatin (Liu et al., 2018), which contrasts with the results of studies on flies 205

(Taliaferro et al., 2013). 206

In human cells, nuclear AGO1/AGO2 copurifies with many RNA-binding proteins, splicing 207

factors, histones and chromatin-related proteins (Ameyar-Zazoua et al., 2012; Batsche and Ameyar-208

Zazoua, 2015) and interacts with RNAPII (Huang et al., 2013). In A. thaliana, FLAG-AGO1 209

coimmunoprecipitates with GFP-tagged SWI/SNF complex subunits (SWI3B, SWI3D and BSH) (Liu et 210

al., 2018). Similar results showing the interaction of AGO2 with SWI/SNF components in an 211

DNA/RNA-independent manner have been reported in HeLa cells (Carissimi et al., 2015). Liu and 212

colleagues have demonstrated that the binding of AGO1 to its chromatin targets is affected in 213

Arabidopsis SWI/SNF subunit mutants, whereas SWI3B recruitment to chromatin is not changed 214 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

6

upon depletion of AGO1. These data suggest that SWI/SNF components are required for the AGO1-215

chromatin association (Liu et al., 2018). However, recent data show that the main ATPase of 216

SWI/SNF, BRM (CHR2), cotranscriptionally inhibits pri-miRNA processing (Wang et al., 2018). These 217

observations raise the question of whether impaired AGO1/chromatin binding in the brm-4 mutant 218

(Liu et al., 2018) could be the result of misregulated sRNA production. 219

AGO1/chromatin binding was shown to be enhanced under biotic and abiotic stresses 220

(Dolata et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2018), and a binding preference to stress-related genes was found 221

among AGO1 chromatin targets (Liu et al., 2018). Interestingly, studies on the influence of the 222

jasmonic acid derivative methyl jasmonate (MeJA) on root growth have shown that its inhibitory 223

effect is reduced in ago1 mutants. Moreover, AGO1 binding to chromatin is induced by MeJA and 224

correlates with elevated target gene expression (Liu et al., 2018). 225 226 Cotranscriptional regulation of miRNA biogenesis by Argonaute1 227

While RNA processing and maturation are known to occur cotranscriptionally in eukaryotic cells 228

(Bentley, 2014; Herzel et al., 2017; Grasser and Grasser, 2018), knowledge of cotranscriptional 229

processes in plants is still limited. Several studies have shown functional correlations among mRNA 230

transcription, splicing, and 5’- and 3’-end processing events in both animals and plants (Geraldo et 231

al., 2009; Liu et al., 2012; Dolata et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016). Similarly, the biogenesis of noncoding 232

RNAs, especially miRNAs, is known to occur cotranscriptionally in both human and animal cells 233

(Morlando et al., 2012; Dhir et al., 2015; Yin et al., 2015; Church et al., 2017). In plants, this field is 234

rather underinvestigated and requires further study. In Arabidopsis, miRNA biogenesis processes, 235

including (i) the amount and activity of various proteins involved in miRNA biogenesis (for review: 236

Rogers and Chen, 2013; Achkar, Cambiagno and Manavella, 2016; Dolata et al., 2018), (ii) the 237

influence of splicing and polyadenylation (Bielewicz et al., 2013; Knop et al., 2016; Stepien et al., 238

2017), (iii) alternative stem-loop structure formation (Iki et al., 2018), (iv) miRNA modifications (Bhat 239

et al., 2016), and (v) miRNA stability (Zhao et al., 2012), are highly regulated. Modulation of pri-240

miRNA processing based on secondary structure has also been recently shown (Wang et al., 2018). 241

Demonstrating a role of CHROMATIN REMODELING FACTOR 2 (CHR2) in unwinding pri-miRNA stem 242

and loop structures in association with Serrate (SE), Wang and colleagues provided evidence of 243

cotranscriptional pri-miRNA processing, as CHR2 also plays a role in SE-independent transcription. 244

Upon the application of different environmental stresses, which alter these regulatory 245

processes, the levels of mature miRNA expression are barely correlated with the expression levels of 246

MIR pri-miRNAs (Barciszewska-Pacak et al., 2015). The role of AGO1 in miRNA biogenesis, especially 247

under stress conditions, was investigated by Dolata and colleagues (Dolata et. al., 2016), who 248

identified some MIR genes (MIR161 and MIR173) that had decreased pri-miRNA levels and increased 249

miRNA accumulation under salinity stress. The increased levels of miRNA161 and miRNA173 (but not 250

the corresponding miRNAs*) were shown to result from AGO1-mediated stabilization, which is 251

consistent with previously published data (Vaucheret et al., 2006; Vaucheret, 2009). While the exact 252

mechanism by which specific miRNAs are preferentially bound and stabilized by RISC under stress 253

conditions is currently unknown, Iki and colleagues (Iki et al., 2018) may have shed some light on this 254

phenomenon, as they showed that the structural flexibility of the pre-miRNA domain within 255

Arabidopsis pri-miR168a could generate different miRNA/miRNA* duplexes with different AGO1-256

binding preferences. 257

While loading could be one aspect underlying the enrichment of some miRNAs under stress 258

conditions, the degradation of other miRNAs could also contribute to this selectivity. Recently, an 259 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

7

association between the miRNA/miRNA* degradation pathway and AGO1 was also established. A 3’-260

5’ exoribonuclease, ATRM2, was shown to selectively degrade miRNA/miRNA* duplexes and partially 261

colocalize with AGO1 in the cytoplasm, and this colocalization was enhanced under heat stress 262

(Wang et al., 2018). The authors suggested that the association with AGO1 may be important for 263

strand selection during degradation and could play a role in modulating miRNA biogenesis in 264

response to environmental conditions. Both miRNA161 and miRNA173 were previously shown to 265

respond to various stresses, including viral infection and drought (Hajdarpasic and Ruggenthaler, 266

2012). Moreover, in addition to targeting protein-coding transcripts, both miRNAs have been shown 267

to be involved in the generation of secondary siRNAs, including TAS1a/b/c- and TAS2-derived 268

tasiRNAs (Rhoades et al., 2002; Allen et al., 2005; Khraiwesh et al., 2012), indicating their importance 269

and potentially explaining the precise and complicated pathways underlying their regulation. 270

Although stabilization or lack thereof can explain the up- or downregulation of mature 271

miRNAs, changes in pri-miRNA levels potentially suggest a role of AGO1 in transcription. This 272

transcriptional/cotranscriptional role of AGO1 in A. thaliana was suggested based on an observation 273

that AGO1 binds to chromatin in close proximity of the MIR161 and MIR173 genes (Dolata et al. 274

2016). AGO1 enrichment on these two MIR genes was observed upon salt stress treatment and 275

correlated with decreased RNAPII occupancy. However, reduced RNAPII levels were limited to MIR 276

gene body regions and not to their promoters. These results together with those of studies on MIR 277

promoter activity indicate that this regulation likely occurs at the elongation/termination phase of 278

transcription. Moreover, the overaccumulation of nonpolyadenylated MIR transcripts indicates that 279

the presence of AGO1 on the gene body causes RNAPII to pause and/or terminate transcription 280

prematurely. Changes in the RNAPII distribution at MIR loci and alterations in pri-miRNA levels under 281

salt stress conditions were far smaller in the ago1-11 background than in the wild-type background, 282

suggesting that AGO1 plays a negative role in cotranscriptional miRNA biogenesis under salt stress. 283

These results contrasted with those indicating the transcriptional role of AGO1, as demonstrated by 284

Liu and colleagues (Liu et. al., 2018). 285

AGO-dependent posttranscriptional processing of miRNA precursors has also been shown in 286

human cells, albeit with AGO2 as the main player. AGO2-cleaved precursor miRNAs (ac-pre-miRNAs) 287

are products of AGO2-mediated pre-miRNA cleavage and endogenous products of miRNA biogenesis 288

(Diederichs and Haber, 2007). On the other hand, certain Arabidopsis pri-miRNAs could be the 289

targets of their own miRNAs (German et al., 2008). German and colleagues suggest that the interplay 290

between polyadenylation and degradation machinery could lead to several different mechanisms by 291

which pri-miRNAs are processed. Recent studies revealed that the binding of AGO1 to MIR genes is 292

RNA-dependent (Dolata et al., 2016). To test whether the association of AGO1 with chromatin 293

requires sRNAs, the Arabidopsis hyl1-2 mutant was analyzed, in which the loading of miRNAs onto 294

AGO1 is known to be hampered (Eamens et al., 2009). As expected, under salt stress, the association 295

of AGO1 with chromatin was weaker in hyl1-2 mutant plants compared to that in wild-type plants. 296

This information in combination with previous results showing colocalization of AGO1 with HYL1 in D-297

bodies (Fang and Spector, 2007) also indicates that AGO1 could act during early stages of miRNA 298

biogenesis. 299

300

Role of ARGONAUTE1 in RNA-mediated DNA repair 301

DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) are caused by reactive oxygen species, ionizing radiation, or 302

failed DNA replication and underlie serious DNA damage, as they cause mutations and genome 303 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

8

instability and may lead to cell death. Therefore, quick repair of DSBs is important for the 304

maintenance of cellular genome integrity and excludes harmful mutations (Iyama and Wilson, 2013). 305

In eukaryotes, DSBs are repaired by two major pathways: homologous recombination (HR) and 306

nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). In the HR pathway, DNA is repaired using sister chromatids as a 307

template, which accurately restores the DNA sequence. NHEJ involves joining of two double-308

stranded DNA strains by DNA synthesis and ligation (Iyama and Wilson, 2013). Wei and colleagues 309

(Wei et al., 2012) elucidated the role of sRNAs in DSB repair via the HR pathway in both HeLa cells 310

and Arabidopsis and showed that knocking down Dicer and AGO2 in human cells reduced the DSB 311

repair efficiency (Wei et al., 2012). The main sRNA-processing enzymes Dicer and DROSHA have also 312

been shown to be involved in activating a response to DNA damage upon genotoxic stress in fly and 313

human cells (Francia et al., 2012; Michalik et al., 2012). Wei and colleagues (Wei et al., 2012) showed 314

that RNAPIV, RDRs and Dicer-like proteins (DCL2, DCL3, DCL4) are required for the proper biogenesis 315

of DSB-induced sRNAs (diRNAs) in Arabidopsis. 316

These diRNAs are incorporated into AGO2 and interact with RNAPV scaffold transcripts to 317

recruit DSB repair proteins to the DSB sites. Therefore, Arabidopsis mutants of proteins involved in 318

diRNA biogenesis reduce the efficiency of DSB repair (Wei et al., 2012). Human AGO2 was later 319

shown to interact with the Rad51 recombinase (Gao et al., 2014), and Rad51 mediates dsDNA 320

ligation during HR (San Filippo et al., 2008). Moreover, AGO2 together with sRNA recruit Rad51 to 321

DSB sites, and the efficiency of HR depends on the association of AGO2 with sRNA (Gao et al., 2014). 322

Further genetic studies have provided evidence that diRNAs are involved in not only HR but also the 323

NHEJ repair pathway in plants (Qi et al., 2016), and Oliver and colleagues showed that Arabidopsis 324

AGO9 is involved in somatic DNA repair (Oliver et al., 2014). The role of AGO9 in the repair of 325

damaged DNA remains unknown, but it very likely acts by associating with sRNAs. In addition to 326

Arabidopsis AGO2 and AGO9, AGO1 was recently shown to be involved in the RNA-mediated DNA 327

repair pathway by forming a complex with DNA damage binding protein 2 (DDB2), the stability of 328

which is mediated by DNA and sRNAs (Schalk et al., 2017). Using DDB2 with a mutated DNA-binding 329

domain, the authors first showed that AGO1-DDB2 did not form, and this complex was shown to be 330

less stable in RNAPV and DCL4 mutants, suggesting that the interactions between AGO1 and DDB2 331

are mediated by sRNAs. 332

Further experiments have revealed that the AGO1-DDB2 complex is involved in DNA repair 333

after UV-C irradiation. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) are a major form of UV-induced DNA 334

lesions that alter the structure of DNA and inhibit transcription and replication. Schalk and colleagues 335

described plant UV-induced sRNAs (uviRNAs). Most uviRNAs associated with the AGO1-DDB2 336

complex are complementary to the DNA strand enriched in CPDs, and the biogenesis of uviRNAs 337

requires transcription to be carried out by RNAPIV. RDR2 produces dsRNAs, which are processed by 338

DCL4 into 21-nt RNAs (Schalk et al., 2017). These data confirm that DNA repair strongly relies on 339

sRNAs produced by PTGS and RNA-dependent DNA repair pathway (Wei et al., 2012; Oliver et al., 340

2014). DDB2 is a key factor for the recognition of DNA damage in the global genome repair (GGR) 341

pathway and for the repair of DNA lesions via nucleotide excision repair (Scharer, 2013; Schalk et al., 342

2017). 343

Similar to the observed accumulation of AGO1 upon salt stress (Dolata et al., 2016), 344

accumulation of AGO1 together with DDB2 in the nucleus has been associated with UV-C irradiation 345

(Schalk et al., 2017) and observed in the chromatin fraction. However, the levels of both proteins 346

decrease very quickly, suggesting that the AGO1-DDB2 complex is transient and short-lived, existing 347

for only a short period after UV-C stress. The ATR (Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and RAD3-like) 348 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

9

protein is important for transmitting DNA damage signals to downstream elements, and the AGO1-349

DDB2 complex stability has been shown to be ATR-dependent. Furthermore, in an atr loss-of-350

function mutant, this complex occupies chromatin for a longer time, demonstrating that the ATR-351

mediated signaling of DNA damage is important for release of the AGO1-DDB2 complex from 352

chromatin (Schalk et al., 2017). After detection of DNA damage, DDB2 must be released from 353

chromatin, allowing downstream players to bind and proceed to the next step of DNA repair in the 354

GGR pathway (Chen et al., 2001; Molinier et al., 2008). 355

Finally, the role of AGO1 in DNA repair in the response to UV stress is detectable at the 356

morphological level. The ago1-27 mutant is more sensitive to UV-C during a period of recovery in the 357

dark, which manifests as reduced root growth after UV-C treatment. Moreover, UV irradiation has a 358

positive effect on recruitment of the AGO1-DDB2 complex to CPD-enriched DNA damage sites (Schalk 359

et al., 2017). Therefore, it is possible that after UV stress, numerous uviRNAs are produced by 360

RNAPV, RDR2, and DCL4, and these uviRNAs increase the stabilization of AGO1 and thus lead to the 361

increased occupancy of AGO1-DDB2 complexes on many damaged chromatin sites. 362

363

Future perspectives 364

Studies published in the past few years decisively highlight the various important roles of AGO1 in 365

the plant cell nucleus, but these data indicate only the outline of possible mechanisms. Nevertheless, 366

many efforts have been exerted to describe the pathways driven by chromatin-associated AGO1 in 367

Arabidopsis in detail. The biological relevance of AGO1 in the nucleus is still an open question, since 368

published data point to certain (stress) conditions for its action (see Outstanding Questions). It is 369

possible that nuclear AGO1 partially overlaps in function with its strictly nuclear homologs. However, 370

severe phenotypes of ago1 knockout mutants in comparison to mutants of proteins acting upstream 371

in the PTGS pathway suggest a much wider role for AGO1. Moreover, available data are based on 372

studies in vegetative tissues and might be the tip of the iceberg. Alternatively, nuclear AGO1 373

functions potentially could be much more prominent in meristematic (Kidner and Martienssen, 2005) 374

tissues, in generative tissues or even specialized cells (Grant-Downton et al., 2009; Borges et al., 375

2011), where small RNA pathways are highly active and play distinct but very important roles (Slotkin 376

et al., 2009; Calarco et al., 2012; Borges et al., 2018). 377

An important question that remains unanswered is how AGO1 is recruited to chromatin. 378

Several possibilities for this phenomenon must be considered, beginning with sequence-specific site 379

recognition in the native transcripts via AGO1-associated sRNAs (Allo et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2012) 380

and/or recruitment to specific histone modifications or chromatin-binding proteins (Ameyar-Zazoua 381

et al., 2012; Taliaferro et al., 2013), as shown in animals. Furthermore, it is important to know how 382

AGO1 binding affects transcription, as it may stimulate specific chromatin modifications and impact 383

the ability of RNAPII to bind to promoter regions (Chu et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2012; Huang et al., 384

2013). Moreover, local changes in histone markers may result in RNAPII elongation rate alterations 385

and alternative splice site selection (Allo et al., 2009; Ameyar-Zazoua et al., 2012). 386

The presence of sRNA-loaded AGO1 in the nucleus raises the question of which factors are 387

responsible for deciding whether this complex is exported to the cytoplasm or retained in the 388

nucleus. Until now, no sRNA sequence-based preferences have been found in plants (Bologna et al., 389

2018; Liu et al., 2018), although these preferences have been elucidated in human cells (Hwang et 390

al., 2007). It is possible that retainment of AGO1 in the nucleus requires the binding of some 391

additional factors or specific sRNA modifications. The list of potential AGO1/AGO2 nuclear 392

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

10

interactors in mammalian cells is broad, suggesting the existence of such interactions in the plant 393

nucleus as well (Ameyar-Zazoua et al., 2012). 394

Interestingly, in Arabidopsis germ line cells, several miRNA-targeted transcripts derived from 395

reactivated transposable elements (TEs) that trigger easiRNA (epigenetically activated sRNA) 396

production have been observed (Creasey et al., 2014; Borges et al., 2018), suggesting that nuclear 397

AGO1 is also involved in protecting the genome from TE-mediated epigenomic instability. Finally, the 398

potential presence of AGO1 in the nucleolus and its association with snoRNA-derived sRNAs (Taft et 399

al., 2009; Gonzalez et al., 2010) raises many questions about its involvement in noncoding RNA 400

maturation. 401

402

403

Author contributions 404

MB, SSB, LS ZSK, AJ, JD, participated in preparing a draft of this manuscript. JD prepared the figure. 405

ZSK, AJ, JD participated in writing and editing the final manuscript. 406

407

Figure legends 408

Figure 1. Diverse functions of ARGONAUTE1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. In addition to its cytoplasmic 409

role in mRNA target cleavage and translation inhibition, AGO1 is associated with chromatin and plays 410

an important role in the regulation of transcription, cotranscriptional miRNA biogenesis, and DNA 411

repair. It is highly probable that AGO1 is also involved in chromatin remodeling and cotranscriptional 412

splicing regulation as well as RNA maturation in the nucleolus. 413

414

References 415

Adelman K, Lis JT (2012) Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II: emerging roles in 416

metazoans. Nat Rev Genet 13: 720-731 417

Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC (2005) microRNA-directed phasing during trans-418

acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 121: 207-221 419

Allo M, Buggiano V, Fededa JP, Petrillo E, Schor I, de la Mata M, Agirre E, Plass M, Eyras E, 420

Elela SA, Klinck R, Chabot B, Kornblihtt AR (2009) Control of alternative splicing 421

through siRNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 717-422

724 423

Ameyar-Zazoua M, Rachez C, Souidi M, Robin P, Fritsch L, Young R, Morozova N, Fenouil R, 424

Descostes N, Andrau JC, Mathieu J, Hamiche A, Ait-Si-Ali S, Muchardt C, Batsche E, 425

Harel-Bellan A (2012) Argonaute proteins couple chromatin silencing to alternative 426

splicing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 998-1004 427

Arribas-Hernandez L, Marchais A, Poulsen C, Haase B, Hauptmann J, Benes V, Meister G, 428

Brodersen P (2016) The Slicer Activity of ARGONAUTE1 Is Required Specifically for 429

the Phasing, Not Production, of Trans-Acting Short Interfering RNAs in Arabidopsis. 430

Plant Cell 28: 1563-1580 431

Barciszewska-Pacak M, Milanowska K, Knop K, Bielewicz D, Nuc P, Plewka P, Pacak AM, 432

Vazquez F, Karlowski W, Jarmolowski A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z (2015) 433

Arabidopsis microRNA expression regulation in a wide range of abiotic stress 434

responses. Front Plant Sci 6: 410 435

Batsche E, Ameyar-Zazoua M (2015) The influence of Argonaute proteins on alternative RNA 436

splicing. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 6: 141-156 437 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

11

Baumberger N, Baulcombe DC (2005) Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE1 is an RNA Slicer that 438

selectively recruits rnicroRNAs and short interfering RNAs. Proceedings of the 439

National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 11928-11933 440

Bentley DL (2014) Coupling mRNA processing with transcription in time and space. Nat Rev 441

Genet 15: 163-175 442

Bhat SS, Jarmolowski A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z (2016) MicroRNA biogenesis: Epigenetic 443

modifications as another layer of complexity in the microRNA expression regulation. 444

Acta Biochim Pol 63: 717-723 445

Bielewicz D, Kalak M, Kalyna M, Windels D, Barta A, Vazquez F, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z, 446

Jarmolowski A (2013) Introns of plant pri-miRNAs enhance miRNA biogenesis. EMBO 447

Rep 14: 622-628 448

Bohmdorfer G, Rowley MJ, Kucinski J, Zhu Y, Amies I, Wierzbicki AT (2014) RNA-directed 449

DNA methylation requires stepwise binding of silencing factors to long non-coding 450

RNA. Plant J 79: 181-191 451

Boland A, Huntzinger E, Schmidt S, Izaurralde E, Weichenrieder O (2011) Crystal structure 452

of the MID-PIWI lobe of a eukaryotic Argonaute protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 453

10466-10471 454

Bologna NG, Iselin R, Abriata LA, Sarazin A, Pumplin N, Jay F, Grentzinger T, Dal Peraro M, 455

Voinnet O (2018) Nucleo-cytosolic Shuttling of ARGONAUTE1 Prompts a Revised 456

Model of the Plant MicroRNA Pathway. Mol Cell 69: 709-719 e705 457

Borges F, Martienssen RA (2015) The expanding world of small RNAs in plants. Nat Rev Mol 458

Cell Biol 16: 727-741 459

Borges F, Parent JS, van Ex F, Wolff P, Martinez G, Kohler C, Martienssen RA (2018) 460

Transposon-derived small RNAs triggered by miR845 mediate genome dosage 461

response in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet 50: 186-192 462

Borges F, Pereira PA, Slotkin RK, Martienssen RA, Becker JD (2011) MicroRNA activity in the 463

Arabidopsis male germline. J Exp Bot 62: 1611-1620 464

Brodersen P, Sakvarelidze-Achard L, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Dunoyer P, Yamamoto YY, 465

Sieburth L, Voinnet O (2008) Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs 466

and siRNAs. Science 320: 1185-1190 467

Calarco JP, Borges F, Donoghue MT, Van Ex F, Jullien PE, Lopes T, Gardner R, Berger F, Feijo 468

JA, Becker JD, Martienssen RA (2012) Reprogramming of DNA methylation in pollen 469

guides epigenetic inheritance via small RNA. Cell 151: 194-205 470

Carbonell A (2017) Plant ARGONAUTEs: Features, Functions, and Unknowns. Methods Mol 471

Biol 1640: 1-21 472

Carbonell A, Fahlgren N, Garcia-Ruiz H, Gilbert KB, Montgomery TA, Nguyen T, Cuperus JT, 473

Carrington JC (2012) Functional analysis of three Arabidopsis ARGONAUTES using 474

slicer-defective mutants. Plant Cell 24: 3613-3629 475

Carissimi C, Laudadio I, Cipolletta E, Gioiosa S, Mihailovich M, Bonaldi T, Macino G, Fulci V 476

(2015) ARGONAUTE2 cooperates with SWI/SNF complex to determine nucleosome 477

occupancy at human Transcription Start Sites. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 1498-1512 478

Carmell MA, Xuan Z, Zhang MQ, Hannon GJ (2002) The Argonaute family: tentacles that 479

reach into RNAi, developmental control, stem cell maintenance, and tumorigenesis. 480

Genes Dev 16: 2733-2742 481

Castel SE, Martienssen RA (2013) RNA interference in the nucleus: roles for small RNAs in 482

transcription, epigenetics and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 14: 100-112 483

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

12

Cernilogar FM, Onorati MC, Kothe GO, Burroughs AM, Parsi KM, Breiling A, Lo Sardo F, 484

Saxena A, Miyoshi K, Siomi H, Siomi MC, Carninci P, Gilmour DS, Corona DF, 485

Orlando V (2011) Chromatin-associated RNA interference components contribute to 486

transcriptional regulation in Drosophila. Nature 480: 391-395 487

Chen X, Zhang Y, Douglas L, Zhou P (2001) UV-damaged DNA-binding proteins are targets of 488

CUL-4A-mediated ubiquitination and degradation. J Biol Chem 276: 48175-48182 489

Chu Y, Yue X, Younger ST, Janowski BA, Corey DR (2010) Involvement of argonaute proteins 490

in gene silencing and activation by RNAs complementary to a non-coding transcript at 491

the progesterone receptor promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 7736-7748 492

Church VA, Pressman S, Isaji M, Truscott M, Cizmecioglu NT, Buratowski S, Frolov MV, 493

Carthew RW (2017) Microprocessor Recruitment to Elongating RNA Polymerase II Is 494

Required for Differential Expression of MicroRNAs. Cell Rep 20: 3123-3134 495

Conine CC, Moresco JJ, Gu W, Shirayama M, Conte D, Jr., Yates JR, 3rd, Mello CC (2013) 496

Argonautes promote male fertility and provide a paternal memory of germline gene 497

expression in C. elegans. Cell 155: 1532-1544 498

Creasey KM, Zhai J, Borges F, Van Ex F, Regulski M, Meyers BC, Martienssen RA (2014) 499

miRNAs trigger widespread epigenetically activated siRNAs from transposons in 500

Arabidopsis. Nature 508: 411-415 501

Derrien B, Clavel M, Baumberger N, Iki T, Sarazin A, Hacquard T, Ponce MR, Ziegler-Graff V, 502

Vaucheret H, Micol JL, Voinnet O, Genschik P (2018) A Suppressor Screen for AGO1 503

Degradation by the Viral F-Box P0 Protein Uncovers a Role for AGO DUF1785 in sRNA 504

Duplex Unwinding. Plant Cell 505

Dhir A, Dhir S, Proudfoot NJ, Jopling CL (2015) Microprocessor mediates transcriptional 506

termination of long noncoding RNA transcripts hosting microRNAs. Nat Struct Mol 507

Biol 22: 319-327 508

Diederichs S, Haber DA (2007) Dual role for argonautes in microRNA processing and 509

posttranscriptional regulation of microRNA expression. Cell 131: 1097-1108 510

Dolata J, Bajczyk M, Bielewicz D, Niedojadlo K, Niedojadlo J, Pietrykowska H, Walczak W, 511

Szweykowska-Kulinska Z, Jarmolowski A (2016) Salt Stress Reveals a New Role for 512

ARGONAUTE1 in miRNA Biogenesis at the Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional 513

Levels. Plant Physiol 172: 297-312 514

Dolata J, Guo Y, Kolowerzo A, Smolinski D, Brzyzek G, Jarmolowski A, Swiezewski S (2015) 515

NTR1 is required for transcription elongation checkpoints at alternative exons in 516

Arabidopsis. EMBO J 34: 544-558 517

Drinnenberg IA, Weinberg DE, Xie KT, Mower JP, Wolfe KH, Fink GR, Bartel DP (2009) RNAi 518

in budding yeast. Science 326: 544-550 519

Duan CG, Zhang HM, Tang K, Zhu XH, Qian WQ, Hou YJ, Wang BS, Lang ZB, Zhao Y, Wang 520

XG, Wang PC, Zhou JP, Liang GM, Liu N, Wang CG, Zhu JK (2015) Specific but 521

interdependent functions for Arabidopsis AGO4 and AGO6 in RNA-directed DNA 522

methylation. Embo Journal 34: 581-592 523

Eamens AL, Smith NA, Curtin SJ, Wang MB, Waterhouse PM (2009) The Arabidopsis 524

thaliana double-stranded RNA binding protein DRB1 directs guide strand selection 525

from microRNA duplexes. RNA 15: 2219-2235 526

Eun C, Lorkovic ZJ, Naumann U, Long Q, Havecker ER, Simon SA, Meyers BC, Matzke AJ, 527

Matzke M (2011) AGO6 functions in RNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing in 528

shoot and root meristems in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 6: e25730 529

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

13

Fang Y, Spector DL (2007) Identification of nuclear dicing bodies containing proteins for 530

microRNA biogenesis in living Arabidopsis plants. Curr Biol 17: 818-823 531

Francia S, Michelini F, Saxena A, Tang D, de Hoon M, Anelli V, Mione M, Carninci P, di 532

Fagagna FD (2012) Site-specific DICER and DROSHA RNA products control the DNA-533

damage response. Nature 488: 231-+ 534

Friend K, Campbell ZT, Cooke A, Kroll-Conner P, Wickens MP, Kimble J (2012) A conserved 535

PUF-Ago-eEF1A complex attenuates translation elongation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 536

176-183 537

Gao M, Wei W, Li MM, Wu YS, Ba Z, Jin KX, Li MM, Liao YQ, Adhikari S, Chong Z, Zhang T, 538

Guo CX, Tang TS, Zhu BT, Xu XZ, Mailand N, Yang YG, Qi Y, Rendtlew Danielsen JM 539

(2014) Ago2 facilitates Rad51 recruitment and DNA double-strand break repair by 540

homologous recombination. Cell Res 24: 532-541 541

Geraldo N, Baurle I, Kidou S, Hu X, Dean C (2009) FRIGIDA delays flowering in Arabidopsis 542

via a cotranscriptional mechanism involving direct interaction with the nuclear cap-543

binding complex. Plant Physiol 150: 1611-1618 544

German MA, Pillay M, Jeong DH, Hetawal A, Luo S, Janardhanan P, Kannan V, Rymarquis 545

LA, Nobuta K, German R, De Paoli E, Lu C, Schroth G, Meyers BC, Green PJ (2008) 546

Global identification of microRNA-target RNA pairs by parallel analysis of RNA ends. 547

Nat Biotechnol 26: 941-946 548

Gonzalez I, Martinez L, Rakitina DV, Lewsey MG, Atencio FA, Llave C, Kalinina NO, Carr JP, 549

Palukaitis P, Canto T (2010) Cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein subcellular targets 550

and interactions: their significance to RNA silencing suppressor activity. Mol Plant 551

Microbe Interact 23: 294-303 552

Grant-Downton R, Hafidh S, Twell D, Dickinson HG (2009) Small RNA pathways are present 553

and functional in the angiosperm male gametophyte. Mol Plant 2: 500-512 554

Grasser M, Grasser KD (2018) The plant RNA polymerase II elongation complex: A hub 555

coordinating transcript elongation and mRNA processing. Transcription 9: 117-122 556

Gu SG, Pak J, Guang S, Maniar JM, Kennedy S, Fire A (2012) Amplification of siRNA in 557

Caenorhabditis elegans generates a transgenerational sequence-targeted histone H3 558

lysine 9 methylation footprint. Nat Genet 44: 157-164 559

Guo H, Ingolia NT, Weissman JS, Bartel DP (2010) Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act 560

to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature 466: 835-840 561

Hajdarpasic A, Ruggenthaler P (2012) Analysis of miRNA expression under stress in 562

Arabidopsis thaliana. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 12: 169-176 563

Hajheidari M, Koncz C, Eick D (2013) Emerging roles for RNA polymerase II CTD in 564

Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 18: 633-643 565

Havecker ER, Wallbridge LM, Hardcastle TJ, Bush MS, Kelly KA, Dunn RM, Schwach F, 566

Doonan JH, Baulcombe DC (2010) The Arabidopsis RNA-Directed DNA Methylation 567

Argonautes Functionally Diverge Based on Their Expression and Interaction with 568

Target Loci. Plant Cell 22: 321-334 569

Herzel L, Ottoz DSM, Alpert T, Neugebauer KM (2017) Splicing and transcription touch base: 570

co-transcriptional spliceosome assembly and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18: 637-571

650 572

Hock J, Meister G (2008) The Argonaute protein family. Genome Biol 9: 210 573

Hu J, Chen Z, Xia D, Wu J, Xu H, Ye ZQ (2012) Promoter-associated small double-stranded 574

RNA interacts with heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 to induce 575

transcriptional activation. Biochem J 447: 407-416 576 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

14

Huang V, Zheng J, Qi Z, Wang J, Place RF, Yu J, Li H, Li LC (2013) Ago1 Interacts with RNA 577

polymerase II and binds to the promoters of actively transcribed genes in human 578

cancer cells. PLoS Genet 9: e1003821 579

Hutvagner G, Simard MJ (2008) Argonaute proteins: key players in RNA silencing. Nat Rev 580

Mol Cell Biol 9: 22-32 581

Hwang HW, Wentzel EA, Mendell JT (2007) A hexanucleotide element directs microRNA 582

nuclear import. Science 315: 97-100 583

Iki T, Clery A, Bologna NG, Sarazin A, Brosnan CA, Pumplin N, Allain FHT, Voinnet O (2018) 584

Structural Flexibility Enables Alternative Maturation, ARGONAUTE Sorting and 585

Activities of miR168, a Global Gene Silencing Regulator in Plants. Mol Plant 11: 1008-586

1023 587

Iki T, Yoshikawa M, Meshi T, Ishikawa M (2012) Cyclophilin 40 facilitates HSP90-mediated 588

RISC assembly in plants. EMBO J 31: 267-278 589

Iwasaki S, Kobayashi M, Yoda M, Sakaguchi Y, Katsuma S, Suzuki T, Tomari Y (2010) 590

Hsc70/Hsp90 chaperone machinery mediates ATP-dependent RISC loading of small 591

RNA duplexes. Mol Cell 39: 292-299 592

Iyama T, Wilson DM, 3rd (2013) DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells. 593

DNA Repair (Amst) 12: 620-636 594

Kalantari R, Chiang CM, Corey DR (2016) Regulation of mammalian transcription and splicing 595

by Nuclear RNAi. Nucleic Acids Res 44: 524-537 596

Khraiwesh B, Zhu JK, Zhu J (2012) Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress 597

responses of plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819: 137-148 598

Kidner CA, Martienssen RA (2005) The role of ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1) in meristem formation 599

and identity. Dev Biol 280: 504-517 600

Kim DH, Villeneuve LM, Morris KV, Rossi JJ (2006) Argonaute-1 directs siRNA-mediated 601

transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13: 793-797 602

Knop K, Stepien A, Barciszewska-Pacak M, Taube M, Bielewicz D, Michalak M, Borst JW, 603

Jarmolowski A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z (2016) Active 5' splice sites regulate the 604

biogenesis efficiency of Arabidopsis microRNAs derived from intron-containing 605

genes. Nucleic Acids Res 606

Kudo N, Matsumori N, Taoka H, Fujiwara D, Schreiner EP, Wolff B, Yoshida M, Horinouchi S 607

(1999) Leptomycin B inactivates CRM1/exportin 1 by covalent modification at a 608

cysteine residue in the central conserved region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 9112-609

9117 610

Kurihara Y, Watanabe Y (2004) Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 611

protein functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 12753-12758 612

Leung AK, Young AG, Bhutkar A, Zheng GX, Bosson AD, Nielsen CB, Sharp PA (2011) 613

Genome-wide identification of Ago2 binding sites from mouse embryonic stem cells 614

with and without mature microRNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 237-244 615

Li S, Liu L, Zhuang X, Yu Y, Liu X, Cui X, Ji L, Pan Z, Cao X, Mo B, Zhang F, Raikhel N, Jiang L, 616

Chen X (2013) MicroRNAs inhibit the translation of target mRNAs on the endoplasmic 617

reticulum in Arabidopsis. Cell 153: 562-574 618

Li Z, Jiang D, Fu X, Luo X, Liu R, He Y (2016) Coupling of histone methylation and RNA 619

processing by the nuclear mRNA cap-binding complex. Nat Plants 2: 16015 620

Liu C, Xin Y, Xu L, Cai Z, Xue Y, Liu Y, Xie D, Liu Y, Qi Y (2018) Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE 1 621

Binds Chromatin to Promote Gene Transcription in Response to Hormones and 622

Stresses. Dev Cell 44: 348-361 e347 623 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

15

Liu F, Bakht S, Dean C (2012) Cotranscriptional role for Arabidopsis DICER-LIKE 4 in 624

transcription termination. Science 335: 1621-1623 625

Liu J, Hu J, Corey DR (2012) Expanding the action of duplex RNAs into the nucleus: 626

redirecting alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 1240-1250 627

Ma JB, Ye K, Patel DJ (2004) Structural basis for overhang-specific small interfering RNA 628

recognition by the PAZ domain. Nature 429: 318-322 629

Ma X, Zuo Z, Shao W, Jin Y, Meng Y (2017) The expanding roles of Argonautes: RNA 630

interference, splicing and beyond. Brief Funct Genomics 631

Martienssen R, Moazed D (2015) RNAi and heterochromatin assembly. Cold Spring Harb 632

Perspect Biol 7: a019323 633

Matzke MA, Mosher RA (2014) RNA-directed DNA methylation: an epigenetic pathway of 634

increasing complexity. Nat Rev Genet 15: 394-408 635

McCue AD, Panda K, Nuthikattu S, Choudury SG, Thomas EN, Slotkin RK (2015) 636

ARGONAUTE 6 bridges transposable element mRNA-derived siRNAs to the 637

establishment of DNA methylation. EMBO J 34: 20-35 638

Meister G (2013) Argonaute proteins: functional insights and emerging roles. Nat Rev Genet 639

14: 447-459 640

Mi SJ, Cai T, Hu YG, Chen Y, Hodges E, Ni FR, Wu L, Li S, Zhou H, Long CZ, Chen S, Hannon 641

GJ, Qi YJ (2008) Sorting of small RNAs into Arabidopsis argonaute complexes is 642

directed by the 5 ' terminal nucleotide. Cell 133: 116-127 643

Michalik KM, Bottcher R, Forstemann K (2012) A small RNA response at DNA ends in 644

Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Research 40: 9596-9603 645

Molinier J, Lechner E, Dumbliauskas E, Genschik P (2008) Regulation and role of Arabidopsis 646

CUL4-DDB1A-DDB2 in maintaining genome integrity upon UV stress. PLoS Genet 4: 647

e1000093 648

Morel J-B, Godon C, Mourrain P, Béclin C, Boutet S, Feuerbach F, Proux F, Vaucheret H 649

(2002) Fertile Hypomorphic ARGONAUTE (ago1) Mutants Impaired in Post-650

Transcriptional Gene Silencing and Virus Resistance. The Plant Cell 14: 629-639 651

Morlando M, Dini Modigliani S, Torrelli G, Rosa A, Di Carlo V, Caffarelli E, Bozzoni I (2012) 652

FUS stimulates microRNA biogenesis by facilitating co-transcriptional Drosha 653

recruitment. EMBO J 31: 4502-4510 654

Oliver C, Santos JL, Pradillo M (2014) On the role of some ARGONAUTE proteins in meiosis 655

and DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science 5 656

Pal-Bhadra M, Bhadra U, Birchler JA (2002) RNAi related mechanisms affect both 657

transcriptional and posttranscriptional transgene silencing in Drosophila. Mol Cell 9: 658

315-327 659

Pal-Bhadra M, Leibovitch BA, Gandhi SG, Chikka MR, Bhadra U, Birchler JA, Elgin SC (2004) 660

Heterochromatic silencing and HP1 localization in Drosophila are dependent on the 661

RNAi machinery. Science 303: 669-672 662

Papp I, Mette MF, Aufsatz W, Daxinger L, Schauer SE, Ray A, van der Winden J, Matzke M, 663

Matzke AJ (2003) Evidence for nuclear processing of plant micro RNA and short 664

interfering RNA precursors. Plant Physiol 132: 1382-1390 665

Park MY, Wu G, Gonzalez-Sulser A, Vaucheret H, Poethig RS (2005) Nuclear processing and 666

export of microRNAs in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 3691-3696 667

Park W, Li J, Song R, Messing J, Chen X (2002) CARPEL FACTORY, a Dicer homolog, and 668

HEN1, a novel protein, act in microRNA metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 669

12: 1484-1495 670 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

16

Parker JS, Roe SM, Barford D (2005) Structural insights into mRNA recognition from a PIWI 671

domain-siRNA guide complex. Nature 434: 663-666 672

Partridge JF, Scott KS, Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T, Allshire RC (2002) cis-acting DNA from 673

fission yeast centromeres mediates histone H3 methylation and recruitment of 674

silencing factors and cohesin to an ectopic site. Curr Biol 12: 1652-1660 675

Pinder BD, Smibert CA (2013) microRNA-independent recruitment of Argonaute 1 to nanos 676

mRNA through the Smaug RNA-binding protein. EMBO Rep 14: 80-86 677

Pontes O, Vitins A, Ream TS, Hong E, Pikaard CS, Costa-Nunes P (2013) Intersection of small 678

RNA pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana sub-nuclear domains. PLoS One 8: e65652 679

Qi Y, Zhang Y, Baller JA, Voytas DF (2016) Histone H2AX and the small RNA pathway 680

modulate both non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination in 681

plants. Mutat Res 783: 9-14 682

Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, Bartel DP (2002) Prediction of plant 683

microRNA targets. Cell 110: 513-520 684

Rohl A, Rohrberg J, Buchner J (2013) The chaperone Hsp90: changing partners for 685

demanding clients. Trends Biochem Sci 38: 253-262 686

San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H (2008) Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. 687

Annu Rev Biochem 77: 229-257 688

Schalk C, Cognat V, Graindorge S, Vincent T, Voinnet O, Molinier J (2017) Small RNA-689

mediated repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by the DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN 690

2 and ARGONAUTE 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114: E2965-E2974 691

Scharer OD (2013) Nucleotide excision repair in eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 692

5: a012609 693

Seth M, Shirayama M, Gu W, Ishidate T, Conte D, Jr., Mello CC (2013) The C. elegans CSR-1 694

argonaute pathway counteracts epigenetic silencing to promote germline gene 695

expression. Dev Cell 27: 656-663 696

Slotkin RK, Vaughn M, Borges F, Tanurdzic M, Becker JD, Feijo JA, Martienssen RA (2009) 697

Epigenetic reprogramming and small RNA silencing of transposable elements in 698

pollen. Cell 136: 461-472 699

Song JJ, Smith SK, Hannon GJ, Joshua-Tor L (2004) Crystal structure of Argonaute and its 700

implications for RISC slicer activity. Science 305: 1434-1437 701

Stepien A, Knop K, Dolata J, Taube M, Bajczyk M, Barciszewska-Pacak M, Pacak A, 702

Jarmolowski A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z (2017) Posttranscriptional coordination of 703

splicing and miRNA biogenesis in plants. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 8 704

Swarts DC, Makarova K, Wang Y, Nakanishi K, Ketting RF, Koonin EV, Patel DJ, van der Oost 705

J (2014) The evolutionary journey of Argonaute proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21: 743-706

753 707

Taft RJ, Glazov EA, Lassmann T, Hayashizaki Y, Carninci P, Mattick JS (2009) Small RNAs 708

derived from snoRNAs. RNA 15: 1233-1240 709

Taliaferro JM, Aspden JL, Bradley T, Marwha D, Blanchette M, Rio DC (2013) Two new and 710

distinct roles for Drosophila Argonaute-2 in the nucleus: alternative pre-mRNA 711

splicing and transcriptional repression. Genes Dev 27: 378-389 712

Vastenhouw NL, Plasterk RH (2004) RNAi protects the Caenorhabditis elegans germline 713

against transposition. Trends Genet 20: 314-319 714

Vaucheret H (2008) Plant ARGONAUTES. Trends Plant Sci 13: 350-358 715

Vaucheret H (2009) AGO1 homeostasis involves differential production of 21-nt and 22-nt 716

miR168 species by MIR168a and MIR168b. PLoS One 4: e6442 717 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

17

Vaucheret H, Mallory AC, Bartel DP (2006) AGO1 homeostasis entails coexpression of 718

MIR168 and AGO1 and preferential stabilization of miR168 by AGO1. Mol Cell 22: 719

129-136 720

Wang W, Ye R, Xin Y, Fang X, Li C, Shi H, Zhou X, Qi Y (2011) An importin beta protein 721

negatively regulates MicroRNA activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23: 3565-3576 722

Wang X, Wang Y, Dou Y, Chen L, Wang J, Jiang N, Guo C, Yao Q, Wang C, Liu L, Yu B, Zheng 723

B, Chekanova JA, Ma J, Ren G (2018) Degradation of unmethylated miRNA/miRNA*s 724

by a DEDDy-type 3' to 5' exoribonuclease Atrimmer 2 in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad 725

Sci U S A 115: E6659-E6667 726

Wang Z, Ma Z, Castillo-Gonzalez C, Sun D, Li Y, Yu B, Zhao B, Li P, Zhang X (2018) SWI2/SNF2 727

ATPase CHR2 remodels pri-miRNAs via Serrate to impede miRNA production. Nature 728

557: 516-521 729

Wei W, Ba Z, Gao M, Wu Y, Ma Y, Amiard S, White CI, Rendtlew Danielsen JM, Yang YG, Qi 730

Y (2012) A role for small RNAs in DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 149: 101-112 731

Wendte JM, Pikaard CS (2017) The RNAs of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Biochim Biophys 732

Acta 1860: 140-148 733

Wierzbicki AT, Haag JR, Pikaard CS (2008) Noncoding transcription by RNA polymerase Pol 734

IVb/Pol V mediates transcriptional silencing of overlapping and adjacent genes. Cell 735

135: 635-648 736

Ye R, Wang W, Iki T, Liu C, Wu Y, Ishikawa M, Zhou X, Qi Y (2012) Cytoplasmic assembly and 737

selective nuclear import of Arabidopsis Argonaute4/siRNA complexes. Mol Cell 46: 738

859-870 739

Yi R, Doehle BP, Qin Y, Macara IG, Cullen BR (2005) Overexpression of exportin 5 enhances 740

RNA interference mediated by short hairpin RNAs and microRNAs. RNA 11: 220-226 741

Yin SY, Yu Y, Reed R (2015) Primary microRNA processing is functionally coupled to RNAP II 742

transcription in vitro. Scientific Reports 5 743

Yu B, Yang Z, Li J, Minakhina S, Yang M, Padgett RW, Steward R, Chen X (2005) Methylation 744

as a crucial step in plant microRNA biogenesis. Science 307: 932-935 745

Zhang H, Xia R, Meyers BC, Walbot V (2015) Evolution, functions, and mysteries of plant 746

ARGONAUTE proteins. Curr Opin Plant Biol 27: 84-90 747

Zhang X, Niu D, Carbonell A, Wang A, Lee A, Tun V, Wang Z, Carrington JC, Chang CE, Jin H 748

(2014) ARGONAUTE PIWI domain and microRNA duplex structure regulate small RNA 749

sorting in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 5: 5468 750

Zhao YY, Mo BX, Chen XM (2012) Mechanisms that impact microRNA stability in plants. Rna 751

Biology 9: 1218-1223 752

Zheng X, Zhu J, Kapoor A, Zhu JK (2007) Role of Arabidopsis AGO6 in siRNA accumulation, 753

DNA methylation and transcriptional gene silencing. EMBO J 26: 1691-1701 754

Zhong X, Du J, Hale CJ, Gallego-Bartolome J, Feng S, Vashisht AA, Chory J, Wohlschlegel JA, 755

Patel DJ, Jacobsen SE (2014) Molecular mechanism of action of plant DRM de novo 756

DNA methyltransferases. Cell 157: 1050-1060 757

Zhu Y, Rowley MJ, Bohmdorfer G, Wierzbicki AT (2013) A SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling 758

complex acts in noncoding RNA-mediated transcriptional silencing. Mol Cell 49: 298-759

309 760

Zilberman D, Cao X, Jacobsen SE (2003) ARGONAUTE4 control of locus-specific siRNA 761

accumulation and DNA and histone methylation. Science 299: 716-719 762

763 https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by

Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

ADVANCES

• Discovery of functional AGO1 in the nucleus has led to re-evaluation of its role in plant cells.

• AGO1 is loaded with miRNAs in the nucleus, and AGO1:miRNA complexes are exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm to act in various pathways.

• AGO1:miRNA complexes bind to chromatin and positively affect gene transcription.

• AGO1 negatively affects the transcription of select MIR genes.

• AGO1 binds uviRNAs and participates in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage as part of the AGO1:uvi-RNA:DDB2 complex.

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS

What is the mechanism underlying the selectivity of nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling?

What are the factors controlling whether the AGO1:miRNA complex is retained in the nucleus? Why is this complex retained in the nucleus?

What elements lead to the stimulation or downregulation of transcription by AGO1?

Does AGO1 influence miRNA levels via cotranscriptional precursor cleavage or abortive transcription?

Does AGO1 bind stress-induced sRNAs (other than uviRNAs) and play a physiological role in the stress response?

Is AGO1 recruited to chromatin by specific histone modifications? Is chromatin remodeling complex recruitment a consequence of AGO1 binding to chromatin?

Does AGO1 affect RNAPII processivity and alternative splicing?

Is AGO1 involved in RNA maturation in the nucleolus?

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Nucleus

Cytoplasm

AAAAAA

Translation inhibitionmRNA cleavage

Nucleo-cytoplasmaticshuttling

HSP90

Co-transcriptionalmiRNA biogenesis

Microprocessor DDB2

DNA repair

SWI/SNF

Transcription

Chromatin remodelingNucleolus

Co-transcriptionalmRNA splicing

Spliceosome

RNA maturation

AGO1

Figure 1. Diverse functions of Argonaute1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. In addition to itscytoplasmic role in mRNA target cleavage and translation inhibition, AGO1 is associatedwith chromatin and plays an important role in the regulation of transcription,cotranscriptional miRNA biogenesis, and DNA repair. It is highly probable that AGO1 isalso involved in chromatin remodeling and cotranscriptional splicing regulation as well asRNA maturation in the nucleolus.

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Parsed CitationsAdelman K, Lis JT (2012) Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II: emerging roles in metazoans. Nat Rev Genet 13: 720-731

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC (2005) microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell121: 207-221

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Allo M, Buggiano V, Fededa JP, Petrillo E, Schor I, de la Mata M, Agirre E, Plass M, Eyras E, Elela SA, Klinck R, Chabot B, Kornblihtt AR(2009) Control of alternative splicing through siRNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 717-724

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Ameyar-Zazoua M, Rachez C, Souidi M, Robin P, Fritsch L, Young R, Morozova N, Fenouil R, Descostes N, Andrau JC, Mathieu J,Hamiche A, Ait-Si-Ali S, Muchardt C, Batsche E, Harel-Bellan A (2012) Argonaute proteins couple chromatin silencing to alternativesplicing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 998-1004

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Arribas-Hernandez L, Marchais A, Poulsen C, Haase B, Hauptmann J, Benes V, Meister G, Brodersen P (2016) The Slicer Activity ofARGONAUTE1 Is Required Specifically for the Phasing, Not Production, of Trans-Acting Short Interfering RNAs in Arabidopsis. PlantCell 28: 1563-1580

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Barciszewska-Pacak M, Milanowska K, Knop K, Bielewicz D, Nuc P, Plewka P, Pacak AM, Vazquez F, Karlowski W, Jarmolowski A,Szweykowska-Kulinska Z (2015) Arabidopsis microRNA expression regulation in a wide range of abiotic stress responses. Front PlantSci 6: 410

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Batsche E, Ameyar-Zazoua M (2015) The influence of Argonaute proteins on alternative RNA splicing. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 6: 141-156

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Baumberger N, Baulcombe DC (2005) Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE1 is an RNA Slicer that selectively recruits rnicroRNAs and shortinterfering RNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 11928-11933

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Bentley DL (2014) Coupling mRNA processing with transcription in time and space. Nat Rev Genet 15: 163-175Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Bhat SS, Jarmolowski A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z (2016) MicroRNA biogenesis: Epigenetic modifications as another layer of complexityin the microRNA expression regulation. Acta Biochim Pol 63: 717-723

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Bielewicz D, Kalak M, Kalyna M, Windels D, Barta A, Vazquez F, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z, Jarmolowski A (2013) Introns of plant pri-miRNAs enhance miRNA biogenesis. EMBO Rep 14: 622-628

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Bohmdorfer G, Rowley MJ, Kucinski J, Zhu Y, Amies I, Wierzbicki AT (2014) RNA-directed DNA methylation requires stepwise binding ofsilencing factors to long non-coding RNA. Plant J 79: 181-191

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Boland A, Huntzinger E, Schmidt S, Izaurralde E, Weichenrieder O (2011) Crystal structure of the MID-PIWI lobe of a eukaryoticArgonaute protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 10466-10471

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Bologna NG, Iselin R, Abriata LA, Sarazin A, Pumplin N, Jay F, Grentzinger T, Dal Peraro M, Voinnet O (2018) Nucleo-cytosolic Shuttlingof ARGONAUTE1 Prompts a Revised Model of the Plant MicroRNA Pathway. Mol Cell 69: 709-719 e705

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Borges F, Martienssen RA (2015) The expanding world of small RNAs in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16: 727-741

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Borges F, Parent JS, van Ex F, Wolff P, Martinez G, Kohler C, Martienssen RA (2018) Transposon-derived small RNAs triggered bymiR845 mediate genome dosage response in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet 50: 186-192

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Borges F, Pereira PA, Slotkin RK, Martienssen RA, Becker JD (2011) MicroRNA activity in the Arabidopsis male germline. J Exp Bot 62:1611-1620

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Brodersen P, Sakvarelidze-Achard L, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Dunoyer P, Yamamoto YY, Sieburth L, Voinnet O (2008) Widespreadtranslational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science 320: 1185-1190

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Calarco JP, Borges F, Donoghue MT, Van Ex F, Jullien PE, Lopes T, Gardner R, Berger F, Feijo JA, Becker JD, Martienssen RA (2012)Reprogramming of DNA methylation in pollen guides epigenetic inheritance via small RNA. Cell 151: 194-205

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Carbonell A (2017) Plant ARGONAUTEs: Features, Functions, and Unknowns. Methods Mol Biol 1640: 1-21Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Carbonell A, Fahlgren N, Garcia-Ruiz H, Gilbert KB, Montgomery TA, Nguyen T, Cuperus JT, Carrington JC (2012) Functional analysisof three Arabidopsis ARGONAUTES using slicer-defective mutants. Plant Cell 24: 3613-3629

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Carissimi C, Laudadio I, Cipolletta E, Gioiosa S, Mihailovich M, Bonaldi T, Macino G, Fulci V (2015) ARGONAUTE2 cooperates withSWI/SNF complex to determine nucleosome occupancy at human Transcription Start Sites. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 1498-1512

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Carmell MA, Xuan Z, Zhang MQ, Hannon GJ (2002) The Argonaute family: tentacles that reach into RNAi, developmental control, stemcell maintenance, and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev 16: 2733-2742

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Castel SE, Martienssen RA (2013) RNA interference in the nucleus: roles for small RNAs in transcription, epigenetics and beyond. NatRev Genet 14: 100-112

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Cernilogar FM, Onorati MC, Kothe GO, Burroughs AM, Parsi KM, Breiling A, Lo Sardo F, Saxena A, Miyoshi K, Siomi H, Siomi MC,Carninci P, Gilmour DS, Corona DF, Orlando V (2011) Chromatin-associated RNA interference components contribute to transcriptionalregulation in Drosophila. Nature 480: 391-395

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Chen X, Zhang Y, Douglas L, Zhou P (2001) UV-damaged DNA-binding proteins are targets of CUL-4A-mediated ubiquitination anddegradation. J Biol Chem 276: 48175-48182

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Chu Y, Yue X, Younger ST, Janowski BA, Corey DR (2010) Involvement of argonaute proteins in gene silencing and activation by RNAscomplementary to a non-coding transcript at the progesterone receptor promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 7736-7748

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Church VA, Pressman S, Isaji M, Truscott M, Cizmecioglu NT, Buratowski S, Frolov MV, Carthew RW (2017) MicroprocessorRecruitment to Elongating RNA Polymerase II Is Required for Differential Expression of MicroRNAs. Cell Rep 20: 3123-3134

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Conine CC, Moresco JJ, Gu W, Shirayama M, Conte D, Jr., Yates JR, 3rd, Mello CC (2013) Argonautes promote male fertility andprovide a paternal memory of germline gene expression in C. elegans. Cell 155: 1532-1544

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Creasey KM, Zhai J, Borges F, Van Ex F, Regulski M, Meyers BC, Martienssen RA (2014) miRNAs trigger widespread epigeneticallyactivated siRNAs from transposons in Arabidopsis. Nature 508: 411-415

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Derrien B, Clavel M, Baumberger N, Iki T, Sarazin A, Hacquard T, Ponce MR, Ziegler-Graff V, Vaucheret H, Micol JL, Voinnet O,Genschik P (2018) A Suppressor Screen for AGO1 Degradation by the Viral F-Box P0 Protein Uncovers a Role for AGO DUF1785 insRNA Duplex Unwinding. Plant Cell

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Dhir A, Dhir S, Proudfoot NJ, Jopling CL (2015) Microprocessor mediates transcriptional termination of long noncoding RNA transcriptshosting microRNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22: 319-327

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Diederichs S, Haber DA (2007) Dual role for argonautes in microRNA processing and posttranscriptional regulation of microRNAexpression. Cell 131: 1097-1108

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Dolata J, Bajczyk M, Bielewicz D, Niedojadlo K, Niedojadlo J, Pietrykowska H, Walczak W, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z, Jarmolowski A(2016) Salt Stress Reveals a New Role for ARGONAUTE1 in miRNA Biogenesis at the Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Levels.Plant Physiol 172: 297-312

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Dolata J, Guo Y, Kolowerzo A, Smolinski D, Brzyzek G, Jarmolowski A, Swiezewski S (2015) NTR1 is required for transcriptionelongation checkpoints at alternative exons in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 34: 544-558

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Drinnenberg IA, Weinberg DE, Xie KT, Mower JP, Wolfe KH, Fink GR, Bartel DP (2009) RNAi in budding yeast. Science 326: 544-550Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Duan CG, Zhang HM, Tang K, Zhu XH, Qian WQ, Hou YJ, Wang BS, Lang ZB, Zhao Y, Wang XG, Wang PC, Zhou JP, Liang GM, Liu N,Wang CG, Zhu JK (2015) Specific but interdependent functions for Arabidopsis AGO4 and AGO6 in RNA-directed DNA methylation.Embo Journal 34: 581-592

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Eamens AL, Smith NA, Curtin SJ, Wang MB, Waterhouse PM (2009) The Arabidopsis thaliana double-stranded RNA binding proteinDRB1 directs guide strand selection from microRNA duplexes. RNA 15: 2219-2235

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Eun C, Lorkovic ZJ, Naumann U, Long Q, Havecker ER, Simon SA, Meyers BC, Matzke AJ, Matzke M (2011) AGO6 functions in RNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing in shoot and root meristems in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 6: e25730

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Fang Y, Spector DL (2007) Identification of nuclear dicing bodies containing proteins for microRNA biogenesis in living Arabidopsisplants. Curr Biol 17: 818-823

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Francia S, Michelini F, Saxena A, Tang D, de Hoon M, Anelli V, Mione M, Carninci P, di Fagagna FD (2012) Site-specific DICER andDROSHA RNA products control the DNA-damage response. Nature 488: 231-+

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Friend K, Campbell ZT, Cooke A, Kroll-Conner P, Wickens MP, Kimble J (2012) A conserved PUF-Ago-eEF1A complex attenuatestranslation elongation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 176-183

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Gao M, Wei W, Li MM, Wu YS, Ba Z, Jin KX, Li MM, Liao YQ, Adhikari S, Chong Z, Zhang T, Guo CX, Tang TS, Zhu BT, Xu XZ, Mailand N,Yang YG, Qi Y, Rendtlew Danielsen JM (2014) Ago2 facilitates Rad51 recruitment and DNA double-strand break repair by homologousrecombination. Cell Res 24: 532-541

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Geraldo N, Baurle I, Kidou S, Hu X, Dean C (2009) FRIGIDA delays flowering in Arabidopsis via a cotranscriptional mechanism involvingdirect interaction with the nuclear cap-binding complex. Plant Physiol 150: 1611-1618

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

German MA, Pillay M, Jeong DH, Hetawal A, Luo S, Janardhanan P, Kannan V, Rymarquis LA, Nobuta K, German R, De Paoli E, Lu C,Schroth G, Meyers BC, Green PJ (2008) Global identification of microRNA-target RNA pairs by parallel analysis of RNA ends. NatBiotechnol 26: 941-946

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Gonzalez I, Martinez L, Rakitina DV, Lewsey MG, Atencio FA, Llave C, Kalinina NO, Carr JP, Palukaitis P, Canto T (2010) Cucumbermosaic virus 2b protein subcellular targets and interactions: their significance to RNA silencing suppressor activity. Mol Plant MicrobeInteract 23: 294-303

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Grant-Downton R, Hafidh S, Twell D, Dickinson HG (2009) Small RNA pathways are present and functional in the angiosperm malegametophyte. Mol Plant 2: 500-512

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Grasser M, Grasser KD (2018) The plant RNA polymerase II elongation complex: A hub coordinating transcript elongation and mRNAprocessing. Transcription 9: 117-122

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Gu SG, Pak J, Guang S, Maniar JM, Kennedy S, Fire A (2012) Amplification of siRNA in Caenorhabditis elegans generates atransgenerational sequence-targeted histone H3 lysine 9 methylation footprint. Nat Genet 44: 157-164

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Guo H, Ingolia NT, Weissman JS, Bartel DP (2010) Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature466: 835-840

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hajdarpasic A, Ruggenthaler P (2012) Analysis of miRNA expression under stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 12:169-176

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hajheidari M, Koncz C, Eick D (2013) Emerging roles for RNA polymerase II CTD in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 18: 633-643Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Havecker ER, Wallbridge LM, Hardcastle TJ, Bush MS, Kelly KA, Dunn RM, Schwach F, Doonan JH, Baulcombe DC (2010) TheArabidopsis RNA-Directed DNA Methylation Argonautes Functionally Diverge Based on Their Expression and Interaction with TargetLoci. Plant Cell 22: 321-334

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Herzel L, Ottoz DSM, Alpert T, Neugebauer KM (2017) Splicing and transcription touch base: co-transcriptional spliceosome assemblyand function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18: 637-650

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hock J, Meister G (2008) The Argonaute protein family. Genome Biol 9: 210Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hu J, Chen Z, Xia D, Wu J, Xu H, Ye ZQ (2012) Promoter-associated small double-stranded RNA interacts with heterogeneous nuclearribonucleoprotein A2/B1 to induce transcriptional activation. Biochem J 447: 407-416

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Huang V, Zheng J, Qi Z, Wang J, Place RF, Yu J, Li H, Li LC (2013) Ago1 Interacts with RNA polymerase II and binds to the promoters ofactively transcribed genes in human cancer cells. PLoS Genet 9: e1003821

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hutvagner G, Simard MJ (2008) Argonaute proteins: key players in RNA silencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 22-32Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Hwang HW, Wentzel EA, Mendell JT (2007) A hexanucleotide element directs microRNA nuclear import. Science 315: 97-100Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Iki T, Clery A, Bologna NG, Sarazin A, Brosnan CA, Pumplin N, Allain FHT, Voinnet O (2018) Structural Flexibility Enables AlternativeMaturation, ARGONAUTE Sorting and Activities of miR168, a Global Gene Silencing Regulator in Plants. Mol Plant 11: 1008-1023

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Iki T, Yoshikawa M, Meshi T, Ishikawa M (2012) Cyclophilin 40 facilitates HSP90-mediated RISC assembly in plants. EMBO J 31: 267-278Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Iwasaki S, Kobayashi M, Yoda M, Sakaguchi Y, Katsuma S, Suzuki T, Tomari Y (2010) Hsc70/Hsp90 chaperone machinery mediates ATP-dependent RISC loading of small RNA duplexes. Mol Cell 39: 292-299

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Iyama T, Wilson DM, 3rd (2013) DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 12: 620-636Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Kalantari R, Chiang CM, Corey DR (2016) Regulation of mammalian transcription and splicing by Nuclear RNAi. Nucleic Acids Res 44:524-537

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Khraiwesh B, Zhu JK, Zhu J (2012) Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants. Biochim Biophys Acta1819: 137-148

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Kidner CA, Martienssen RA (2005) The role of ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1) in meristem formation and identity. Dev Biol 280: 504-517Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Kim DH, Villeneuve LM, Morris KV, Rossi JJ (2006) Argonaute-1 directs siRNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing in human cells.Nat Struct Mol Biol 13: 793-797

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Knop K, Stepien A, Barciszewska-Pacak M, Taube M, Bielewicz D, Michalak M, Borst JW, Jarmolowski A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z(2016) Active 5' splice sites regulate the biogenesis efficiency of Arabidopsis microRNAs derived from intron-containing genes.Nucleic Acids Res

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Kudo N, Matsumori N, Taoka H, Fujiwara D, Schreiner EP, Wolff B, Yoshida M, Horinouchi S (1999) Leptomycin B inactivatesCRM1/exportin 1 by covalent modification at a cysteine residue in the central conserved region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 9112-9117

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Kurihara Y, Watanabe Y (2004) Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 protein functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:12753-12758

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Leung AK, Young AG, Bhutkar A, Zheng GX, Bosson AD, Nielsen CB, Sharp PA (2011) Genome-wide identification of Ago2 binding sitesfrom mouse embryonic stem cells with and without mature microRNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 237-244

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Li S, Liu L, Zhuang X, Yu Y, Liu X, Cui X, Ji L, Pan Z, Cao X, Mo B, Zhang F, Raikhel N, Jiang L, Chen X (2013) MicroRNAs inhibit thetranslation of target mRNAs on the endoplasmic reticulum in Arabidopsis. Cell 153: 562-574

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Li Z, Jiang D, Fu X, Luo X, Liu R, He Y (2016) Coupling of histone methylation and RNA processing by the nuclear mRNA cap-bindingcomplex. Nat Plants 2: 16015

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Liu C, Xin Y, Xu L, Cai Z, Xue Y, Liu Y, Xie D, Liu Y, Qi Y (2018) Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE 1 Binds Chromatin to Promote GeneTranscription in Response to Hormones and Stresses. Dev Cell 44: 348-361 e347

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Liu F, Bakht S, Dean C (2012) Cotranscriptional role for Arabidopsis DICER-LIKE 4 in transcription termination. Science 335: 1621-1623Pubmed: Author and Title

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Liu J, Hu J, Corey DR (2012) Expanding the action of duplex RNAs into the nucleus: redirecting alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res40: 1240-1250

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Ma JB, Ye K, Patel DJ (2004) Structural basis for overhang-specific small interfering RNA recognition by the PAZ domain. Nature 429:318-322

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Ma X, Zuo Z, Shao W, Jin Y, Meng Y (2017) The expanding roles of Argonautes: RNA interference, splicing and beyond. Brief FunctGenomics

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Martienssen R, Moazed D (2015) RNAi and heterochromatin assembly. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7: a019323Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Matzke MA, Mosher RA (2014) RNA-directed DNA methylation: an epigenetic pathway of increasing complexity. Nat Rev Genet 15: 394-408

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

McCue AD, Panda K, Nuthikattu S, Choudury SG, Thomas EN, Slotkin RK (2015) ARGONAUTE 6 bridges transposable element mRNA-derived siRNAs to the establishment of DNA methylation. EMBO J 34: 20-35

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Meister G (2013) Argonaute proteins: functional insights and emerging roles. Nat Rev Genet 14: 447-459Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Mi SJ, Cai T, Hu YG, Chen Y, Hodges E, Ni FR, Wu L, Li S, Zhou H, Long CZ, Chen S, Hannon GJ, Qi YJ (2008) Sorting of small RNAsinto Arabidopsis argonaute complexes is directed by the 5 ' terminal nucleotide. Cell 133: 116-127

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Michalik KM, Bottcher R, Forstemann K (2012) A small RNA response at DNA ends in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Research 40: 9596-9603Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Molinier J, Lechner E, Dumbliauskas E, Genschik P (2008) Regulation and role of Arabidopsis CUL4-DDB1A-DDB2 in maintaininggenome integrity upon UV stress. PLoS Genet 4: e1000093

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Morel J-B, Godon C, Mourrain P, Béclin C, Boutet S, Feuerbach F, Proux F, Vaucheret H (2002) Fertile Hypomorphic ARGONAUTE(ago1) Mutants Impaired in Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing and Virus Resistance. The Plant Cell 14: 629-639

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Morlando M, Dini Modigliani S, Torrelli G, Rosa A, Di Carlo V, Caffarelli E, Bozzoni I (2012) FUS stimulates microRNA biogenesis byfacilitating co-transcriptional Drosha recruitment. EMBO J 31: 4502-4510

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Oliver C, Santos JL, Pradillo M (2014) On the role of some ARGONAUTE proteins in meiosis and DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana.Frontiers in Plant Science 5

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Pal-Bhadra M, Bhadra U, Birchler JA (2002) RNAi related mechanisms affect both transcriptional and posttranscriptional transgenesilencing in Drosophila. Mol Cell 9: 315-327

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Pal-Bhadra M, Leibovitch BA, Gandhi SG, Chikka MR, Bhadra U, Birchler JA, Elgin SC (2004) Heterochromatic silencing and HP1localization in Drosophila are dependent on the RNAi machinery. Science 303: 669-672

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Papp I, Mette MF, Aufsatz W, Daxinger L, Schauer SE, Ray A, van der Winden J, Matzke M, Matzke AJ (2003) Evidence for nuclear

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

processing of plant micro RNA and short interfering RNA precursors. Plant Physiol 132: 1382-1390Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Park MY, Wu G, Gonzalez-Sulser A, Vaucheret H, Poethig RS (2005) Nuclear processing and export of microRNAs in Arabidopsis. ProcNatl Acad Sci U S A 102: 3691-3696

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Park W, Li J, Song R, Messing J, Chen X (2002) CARPEL FACTORY, a Dicer homolog, and HEN1, a novel protein, act in microRNAmetabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 12: 1484-1495

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Parker JS, Roe SM, Barford D (2005) Structural insights into mRNA recognition from a PIWI domain-siRNA guide complex. Nature 434:663-666

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Partridge JF, Scott KS, Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T, Allshire RC (2002) cis-acting DNA from fission yeast centromeres mediates histoneH3 methylation and recruitment of silencing factors and cohesin to an ectopic site. Curr Biol 12: 1652-1660

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Pinder BD, Smibert CA (2013) microRNA-independent recruitment of Argonaute 1 to nanos mRNA through the Smaug RNA-bindingprotein. EMBO Rep 14: 80-86

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Pontes O, Vitins A, Ream TS, Hong E, Pikaard CS, Costa-Nunes P (2013) Intersection of small RNA pathways in Arabidopsis thalianasub-nuclear domains. PLoS One 8: e65652

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Qi Y, Zhang Y, Baller JA, Voytas DF (2016) Histone H2AX and the small RNA pathway modulate both non-homologous end-joining andhomologous recombination in plants. Mutat Res 783: 9-14

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, Bartel DP (2002) Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell 110: 513-520Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Rohl A, Rohrberg J, Buchner J (2013) The chaperone Hsp90: changing partners for demanding clients. Trends Biochem Sci 38: 253-262Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H (2008) Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 229-257Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Schalk C, Cognat V, Graindorge S, Vincent T, Voinnet O, Molinier J (2017) Small RNA-mediated repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by theDNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN 2 and ARGONAUTE 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114: E2965-E2974

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Scharer OD (2013) Nucleotide excision repair in eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5: a012609Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Seth M, Shirayama M, Gu W, Ishidate T, Conte D, Jr., Mello CC (2013) The C. elegans CSR-1 argonaute pathway counteracts epigeneticsilencing to promote germline gene expression. Dev Cell 27: 656-663

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Slotkin RK, Vaughn M, Borges F, Tanurdzic M, Becker JD, Feijo JA, Martienssen RA (2009) Epigenetic reprogramming and small RNAsilencing of transposable elements in pollen. Cell 136: 461-472

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Song JJ, Smith SK, Hannon GJ, Joshua-Tor L (2004) Crystal structure of Argonaute and its implications for RISC slicer activity. Science305: 1434-1437

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Stepien A, Knop K, Dolata J, Taube M, Bajczyk M, Barciszewska-Pacak M, Pacak A, Jarmolowski A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z (2017)Posttranscriptional coordination of splicing and miRNA biogenesis in plants. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 8

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Swarts DC, Makarova K, Wang Y, Nakanishi K, Ketting RF, Koonin EV, Patel DJ, van der Oost J (2014) The evolutionary journey ofArgonaute proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21: 743-753

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Taft RJ, Glazov EA, Lassmann T, Hayashizaki Y, Carninci P, Mattick JS (2009) Small RNAs derived from snoRNAs. RNA 15: 1233-1240Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Taliaferro JM, Aspden JL, Bradley T, Marwha D, Blanchette M, Rio DC (2013) Two new and distinct roles for Drosophila Argonaute-2 inthe nucleus: alternative pre-mRNA splicing and transcriptional repression. Genes Dev 27: 378-389

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Vastenhouw NL, Plasterk RH (2004) RNAi protects the Caenorhabditis elegans germline against transposition. Trends Genet 20: 314-319

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Vaucheret H (2008) Plant ARGONAUTES. Trends Plant Sci 13: 350-358Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Vaucheret H (2009) AGO1 homeostasis involves differential production of 21-nt and 22-nt miR168 species by MIR168a and MIR168b.PLoS One 4: e6442

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Vaucheret H, Mallory AC, Bartel DP (2006) AGO1 homeostasis entails coexpression of MIR168 and AGO1 and preferential stabilizationof miR168 by AGO1. Mol Cell 22: 129-136

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wang W, Ye R, Xin Y, Fang X, Li C, Shi H, Zhou X, Qi Y (2011) An importin beta protein negatively regulates MicroRNA activity inArabidopsis. Plant Cell 23: 3565-3576

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wang X, Wang Y, Dou Y, Chen L, Wang J, Jiang N, Guo C, Yao Q, Wang C, Liu L, Yu B, Zheng B, Chekanova JA, Ma J, Ren G (2018)Degradation of unmethylated miRNA/miRNA*s by a DEDDy-type 3' to 5' exoribonuclease Atrimmer 2 in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A 115: E6659-E6667

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wang Z, Ma Z, Castillo-Gonzalez C, Sun D, Li Y, Yu B, Zhao B, Li P, Zhang X (2018) SWI2/SNF2 ATPase CHR2 remodels pri-miRNAs viaSerrate to impede miRNA production. Nature 557: 516-521

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wei W, Ba Z, Gao M, Wu Y, Ma Y, Amiard S, White CI, Rendtlew Danielsen JM, Yang YG, Qi Y (2012) A role for small RNAs in DNAdouble-strand break repair. Cell 149: 101-112

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wendte JM, Pikaard CS (2017) The RNAs of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1860: 140-148Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Wierzbicki AT, Haag JR, Pikaard CS (2008) Noncoding transcription by RNA polymerase Pol IVb/Pol V mediates transcriptional silencingof overlapping and adjacent genes. Cell 135: 635-648

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Ye R, Wang W, Iki T, Liu C, Wu Y, Ishikawa M, Zhou X, Qi Y (2012) Cytoplasmic assembly and selective nuclear import of ArabidopsisArgonaute4/siRNA complexes. Mol Cell 46: 859-870

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Yi R, Doehle BP, Qin Y, Macara IG, Cullen BR (2005) Overexpression of exportin 5 enhances RNA interference mediated by shorthairpin RNAs and microRNAs. RNA 11: 220-226

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Yin SY, Yu Y, Reed R (2015) Primary microRNA processing is functionally coupled to RNAP II transcription in vitro. Scientific Reports 5Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Yu B, Yang Z, Li J, Minakhina S, Yang M, Padgett RW, Steward R, Chen X (2005) Methylation as a crucial step in plant microRNAbiogenesis. Science 307: 932-935

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Zhang H, Xia R, Meyers BC, Walbot V (2015) Evolution, functions, and mysteries of plant ARGONAUTE proteins. Curr Opin Plant Biol27: 84-90

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Zhang X, Niu D, Carbonell A, Wang A, Lee A, Tun V, Wang Z, Carrington JC, Chang CE, Jin H (2014) ARGONAUTE PIWI domain andmicroRNA duplex structure regulate small RNA sorting in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 5: 5468

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Zhao YY, Mo BX, Chen XM (2012) Mechanisms that impact microRNA stability in plants. Rna Biology 9: 1218-1223Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Zheng X, Zhu J, Kapoor A, Zhu JK (2007) Role of Arabidopsis AGO6 in siRNA accumulation, DNA methylation and transcriptional genesilencing. EMBO J 26: 1691-1701

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Zhong X, Du J, Hale CJ, Gallego-Bartolome J, Feng S, Vashisht AA, Chory J, Wohlschlegel JA, Patel DJ, Jacobsen SE (2014) Molecularmechanism of action of plant DRM de novo DNA methyltransferases. Cell 157: 1050-1060

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Zhu Y, Rowley MJ, Bohmdorfer G, Wierzbicki AT (2013) A SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex acts in noncoding RNA-mediatedtranscriptional silencing. Mol Cell 49: 298-309

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

Zilberman D, Cao X, Jacobsen SE (2003) ARGONAUTE4 control of locus-specific siRNA accumulation and DNA and histone methylation.Science 299: 716-719

Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title

https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 29, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.