50
Presentation by Location Number of Deployed Intersections MAP Message Broadcast Planned Central System Connectivity Fixed/Actuate d Signal RTCMs In‐ house/Co ntract Formal Procurement Process Current Applications Future Applications Notes CalTrans Palo Alto, CA 11 11 6 20% all actuated Yes Contract, PATH No transit signal priority, freight signal priority Eco‐ Approach/D eparture 1. We will test Red‐light violation warnings application next Summer with Valeo. 2. California Connected Vehicle Test Bed: Established in Palo Alto in 2005 by Caltrans, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and PATH.First‐in‐the‐nation facility for testing CV applications using Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) on public roads. Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Cranberry ‐ PA 35 11 200 100% 1/3 fixed; 2/3 real time adaptive No Contract, CMU FDOT Tallahassee, Florida 24 24 100+ 0% most semi‐ actuated No Both contract and in‐ house Yes 1. A second project with 27 intersections is being planned for deployment in Gainesville. 2. A CV Business Plan is being developed. There are several CAV projects being planned or designed. MCDOT Anthem, AZ 11 11 100+ 100% all semi‐ actuated No Both contract (U of A) and in‐ house Yes MMITSS (I‐SIG: Intelligent Traffic Signal System, PREEMPT: Emergency Vehicle Preemption with Proximity Warning, TSP: Transit Signal Priority, FSP: Freight Signal Priority, PED‐SIG: Mobile Accessible Pedestrian Signal System) MMITSS, Work Zone 1. Other CAV projects: Loop 101 Mobility Project, CVISN Work Zone Project 2. Future: 6 Freeway Interchanges, 11 Freeway Locations, 2000 Equipped Vehicles 3.Other CV Application Prototypes in Anthem: School zone alert, emergency vehicle alert, construction zone alert, emergency vehicle alert, incident ahead alert TXDOT 20 (minimum) 1. TxDOT does not currently have any intersections that broadcast SPaT information 2. There are a few cities that use TTS, inc. as a service to provide SPaT data. Currently, works with special equipped Audi vehicles. 3. TxDOT is currently pursuing a Grant to do a Texas Connected Freight Corridor 4. TXDOT is in the process of setting up Blanket Purchase for RSUs. UDOT Salt Lake City, UT 24 24 150 100% all actuated No Both contract and in‐ house Yes Transit signal priority 1. Combination of in‐house and contract. MAPs were developed in‐house. Contractor performed most other tasks, with oversight and input. 2. CAV Support: Coalition for Safety Sooner, AV Legislation. 3. No formal plan for maintaining or upgrading. We have plans for expanding the use of SPaT. Michigan DOT Ann Arbor, City of Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta ge contract. Yes (See note 2) Multiple OEMs, and Suppliers are actively using the intersections for application testing. Transit Signal Priority, transit preemption, emergency vehicle preemption 1. Ongoing maintenance and operations is handed via contracts. 2. DTMB Procurement for bulk hardware purchases. Contractor procured for design projects. 3. We have endorsed a number of initiatives related to connected and automated vehicle testing and deployments. 4. We have the following programmatic elements in place. Hardware specifications and design standards, as‐ needed CV infrastructure designers, prequalified installation contractors, infrastructure hardware integrators, back office system and application development contracts, field infrastructure maintenance contract, as needed‐ CV programmatic support contract, as‐needed MAP data collection and development contract, etc.

Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Presentation 

byLocation

Number of 

Deployed 

Intersections

MAP 

Message 

Broadcast

PlannedCentral System 

Connectivity

Fixed/Actuate

d SignalRTCMs

In‐

house/Co

ntract

Formal 

Procurement 

Process

Current ApplicationsFuture 

ApplicationsNotes

CalTransPalo Alto, 

CA11 11 6 20% all actuated Yes

Contract, 

PATHNo

transit signal priority, 

freight signal priority  

Eco‐

Approach/D

eparture

1. We will test Red‐light violation warnings 

application next Summer with Valeo. 2. 

California Connected Vehicle Test Bed: 

Established in Palo Alto in 2005 by Caltrans, 

the Metropolitan Transportation 

Commission, and PATH.First‐in‐the‐nation 

facility for testing CV applications using 

Dedicated Short Range Communications 

(DSRC) on public roads.

Carnegie 

Mellon 

University

Pittsburgh, 

Cranberry ‐ 

PA

35 11 200 100%

1/3 fixed; 2/3 

real time 

adaptive

NoContract, 

CMU

FDOTTallahassee, 

Florida24 24 100+ 0%

most semi‐

actuatedNo

Both 

contract 

and in‐

house

Yes

1. A second project with 27 intersections is 

being planned for deployment in 

Gainesville. 2. A CV Business Plan is being 

developed. There are several CAV projects 

being planned or designed.

MCDOT Anthem, AZ  11 11 100+ 100%all semi‐

actuatedNo

Both 

contract 

(U of A) 

and in‐

house

Yes

MMITSS (I‐SIG: Intelligent 

Traffic Signal System, 

PREEMPT: Emergency 

Vehicle Preemption with 

Proximity Warning, TSP: 

Transit Signal Priority, 

FSP: Freight Signal 

Priority, PED‐SIG: Mobile 

Accessible Pedestrian 

Signal System)

MMITSS, 

Work Zone

1. Other CAV projects: Loop 101 Mobility 

Project, CVISN Work Zone Project 2. Future: 

6 Freeway Interchanges, 11 Freeway 

Locations, 2000 Equipped Vehicles 3.Other 

CV Application Prototypes in Anthem: 

School zone alert, emergency vehicle alert, 

construction zone alert, emergency vehicle 

alert, incident ahead alert

TXDOT20 

(minimum)

1. TxDOT does not currently have any 

intersections that broadcast SPaT 

information 2. There are a few cities that 

use TTS, inc. as a service to provide SPaT 

data. Currently, works with special 

equipped Audi vehicles.  3. TxDOT is 

currently pursuing a Grant to do a Texas 

Connected Freight Corridor 4. TXDOT is in 

the process of setting up Blanket Purchase 

for RSUs.

UDOTSalt Lake 

City, UT24 24 150 100% all actuated No

Both 

contract 

and in‐

house

Yes Transit signal priority

1. Combination of in‐house and contract. 

MAPs were developed in‐house. Contractor 

performed most other tasks, with oversight 

and input. 2. CAV Support: Coalition for 

Safety Sooner, AV Legislation. 3. No formal 

plan for maintaining or upgrading. We have 

plans for expanding the use of SPaT. 

Michigan 

DOT

Ann Arbor, 

City of 

Detroit, 

USDOT SE 

MI Test Bed ‐

MI

110 100% 500 100%

Estimate 30% 

fixed/70% 

acutuatedNo

Combinat

ion, but 

large 

percenta

ge 

contract. 

Yes (See note 

2)

Multiple OEMs, and 

Suppliers are actively 

using the intersections for 

application testing.

Transit 

Signal 

Priority, 

transit 

preemption, 

emergency 

vehicle 

preemption

1. Ongoing maintenance and operations is 

handed via contracts. 2. DTMB Procurement 

for bulk hardware purchases. Contractor 

procured for design projects. 3. We have 

endorsed a number of initiatives related to 

connected and automated vehicle testing 

and deployments. 4. We have the following 

programmatic elements in place.  Hardware 

specifications and design standards, as‐

needed CV infrastructure designers, 

prequalified installation contractors, 

infrastructure hardware integrators, back 

office system and application development 

contracts, field infrastructure maintenance 

contract, as needed‐ CV programmatic 

support contract, as‐needed MAP data 

collection and development contract, etc.

Page 2: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information? 11

• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP

message? 100%

• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by

2020? 17

• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system? 20%

CalTrans

Page 3: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage

run actuated/semi-actuated timing? 0%; 100%

• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? 100%

• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for

ongoing maintenance and operation? ”Contract” (PATH); TBD

• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware? No

CalTrans

Page 4: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT

multimodal features:

• transit signal priority 100%

• transit preemption 0%

• emergency vehicle preemption 0%

• Red-light violation warnings ??? This is an in-vehicle application. We will test this app next Summer with Valeo

• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,

what are they? TSP, and FSP

CalTrans

Page 5: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by

2020? If so, what are they? Yes; Eco-Approach/Departure

• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and

automated vehicle technology initiatives? Yes; yes

• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and

expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology? No; this process still needs to be developed

CalTrans

Page 6: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

California Connected Vehicle Test Bed• Established in Palo Alto in 2005 by Caltrans, the Metropolitan Transportation

Commission, and PATH• First-in-the-nation facility for testing CV applications using Dedicated Short Range

Communications (DSRC) on public roads• Located on El Camino Real (SR 82)

• 2.1 miles long• 11 consecutive intersections• 6 more planned• AADT of 50K vehicles/day• Busy transit corridor

CalTrans

Page 7: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

24 intersections are equipped with DSRC Radio

Communications

Carnegie-Mellon University

Page 8: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Carnegie-Mellon University

Page 9: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information?

• City of Pittsburgh – 24

• Cranberry PA - 11

• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP

message? 11 (in Cranberry)

• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by

2020?

• City of Pittsburgh - 200

• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system? 100%

Carnegie-Mellon University

Page 10: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage

run actuated/semi-actuated timing? 1/3 fixed; 2/3 real-time adaptive

• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? 0%

• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for

ongoing maintenance and operation?

• CMU has installed and maintained

• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware?

Carnegie-Mellon University

Page 11: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT

multimodal features:

• transit signal priority

• transit preemption

• emergency vehicle preemption

• Red-light violation warnings

• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,

what are they?

Carnegie-Mellon University

Page 12: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by

2020? If so, what are they?

• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and

automated vehicle technology initiatives?

• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and

expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology?

Carnegie-Mellon University

Page 13: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Carnegie-Mellon University

Page 14: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information?

• 24

• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP message?

• All

• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by

2020?

• 100+

• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system?

• None at this time, but plan to consider this effort.

FDOT

Page 15: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage run actuated/semi-

actuated timing?• Magnolia – Tennessee runs free all day, fully actuated except min recall EB/WB. • Calhoun and Gadsden on Tennessee both run coordinated pretimed (ped recalls all directions) during the day. • All the rest run coordinated semi-actuated with min recall on main street and fully actuated on side street.

• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs?

• None

• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for ongoing maintenance and operation?

• Both in-house and contract support.

• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware?

• Yes; we followed the standard RFP process.

FDOT

Page 16: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT

multimodal features: None but being explored as a research project.

• transit signal priority

• transit preemption

• emergency vehicle preemption

• Red-light violation warnings

• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,

what are they?

• None at this stage.

FDOT

Page 17: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by

2020? If so, what are they?

• Yes; a second project with 27 intersections is being planned for deployment in Gainesville.

• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and

automated vehicle technology initiatives?

• There are several CAV projects being planned or designed.

• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and

expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology?

• A CV Business Plan is being developed.

FDOT

Page 18: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

FDOT

Page 19: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information? 11

• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP

message? 100%

• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by

2020? 100+

• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system? 100%

MCDOT

Page 20: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage

run actuated/semi-actuated timing? 100% semi actuated

• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? None

• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for

ongoing maintenance and operation? In-House and through partnership with UofA

• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware? Yes

MCDOT

Page 21: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT

multimodal features:

• transit signal priority

• transit preemption

• emergency vehicle preemption

• Freight Priority

• Red-light violation warnings

• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,

what are they? MMITSS

MCDOT

Page 22: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by

2020? If so, what are they? MMITSS, Work Zone

• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and

automated vehicle technology initiatives? Yes, Loop 101 Mobility Project, CVISN Work Zone

Project

• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and

expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology? Draft developed

MCDOT

Page 23: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

MCDOT

Page 24: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Faisal SaleemITS Branch Manager &

MCDOT SMARTDrive Program ManagerSM

Maricopa County Department of Transportation, Arizona

Anthem SMARTDrive Connected Vehicle Test Bed

ITS World Congress 2017

Page 25: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Traffic Signal Priority

• Multiple Requests• GPS Intersection Map• DSRC 2-way

communications between vehicles and signal (V2I)

Ramp Meter Priority• GPS Ramp Map• DSRC 2-way communications

between vehicles and controller (V2I)

Ad-Hoc Warning Beacon• GPS Roadway Map• DSRC communications

between vehicles and vehicles (V2V)

AZ511 Information via Backhaul

Early V2I Concept Development2007

Page 26: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Signal Preempt Demo

Ramp Meter Priority Demo

Early Testing (Parking Lot)2008

Page 27: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

February 22, 2010First Live Intersection Test of Emergency Vehicle - IntelliDriveSM

67th Avenue and SouthernMaricopa County, AZ

Early Testing (Field)

Page 28: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Arizona Connected Vehicle Test BedAnthem, AZ (SMARTDrive)

Approx. 25,000 ResidentsApprox. 10,000 Vehicles

DSRC Installations:6 Signalized Intersection

Freeway Interchanges1

Freeway Locations1

2011

Page 29: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Arizona Connected Vehicle Test BedAnthem, AZ (SMARTDrive)

DSRC Installations:11 Signalized IntersectionVehicles5 Equipped VehiclesFuture6 Freeway Interchanges11 Freeway Locations2000 Equipped Vehicles

Page 30: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System (MMITSS) – CV Pooled Fund Project

• I-SIG: Intelligent Traffic Signal System• PREEMPT: Emergency Vehicle Preemption with

Proximity Warning• TSP: Transit Signal Priority • FSP: Freight Signal Priority • PED-SIG: Mobile Accessible Pedestrian

Signal System

2012

Page 31: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

A Traffic Control System

MMITSS Basic Concepts

Section 1• Priority for

• Freight

Priority Hierarchy• Rail Crossings• Emergency Vehicles• Freight• Coordination• Transit

• BRT• Express• Local (Late)

• Passenger Vehicles• Pedestrians

Page 32: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Connected Vehicle Demonstration

9 9

Connected Vehicle Demonstration

Emergency Vehicles have priority over Transit

Page 33: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

MMITSS Pedestrian Smartphone AppMMITSS Pedestrian Smartphone app

Allows Pedestrian to receive auditory and haptic feedback• Align with Crosswalk • Send Call for Service• Be given WALK • PedCLEAR Countdown• Guidance to stay in

Crosswalk• V2P Situational Awareness

Savari SmartCross (SBIR) Application Architecture Sara Khosravi, PhD Student

Page 34: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Other CV Application Prototypes in Anthem

Incident Ahead Alert!

Construction Zone Alert!

Emergency Vehicle Alert!

Emergency Vehicle Alert!

School ZoneAlert!

Intelligent Traffic Signal System

Page 35: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Other CV Applications

Work Zone

Freight Priority Corridor

L101 Mobility Project

ADOT SPaTCorridor

Page 36: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information?

• 20 MDOT RSUs Deployed Operational (100 actively being deployed in SE MI)

• 40: UMTRI AACVTE (Ann Arbor, MI)

• 40 USDOT SE MI Test Bed

• 10: City of Detroit

• 110: Total in Operation

• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP message?• 100%

• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by 2020?• 500 Planned by end of Calendar year 2020.

• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system?• MDOT: 100%

MDOT

Page 37: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage

run actuated/semi-actuated timing? Estimate 30%/70%

• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? 0%

• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for

ongoing maintenance and operation? Combination, but large percentage contract. Ongoing

maintenance and operations is handed via contracts.

• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware?

• Yes, DTMB Procurement for bulk hardware purchases. Contractor procured for design projects.

MDOT

Page 38: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT

multimodal features:

• transit signal priority: 0%

• transit preemption: 0%

• emergency vehicle preemption: 0%

• Red-light violation warnings: 0% (In-vehicle application deployed by vehicle manufacturer’s)

• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,

what are they? All intersections are broadcasting SPaT, MAP per SAE 2016 Standards. Multiple

OEMs, and Suppliers are actively using the intersections for application testing.

MDOT

Page 39: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by 2020? If so,

what are they? Transit Signal Priority, transit preemption, emergency vehicle preemption.

• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and automated vehicle

technology initiatives? Yes, and we have endorsed a number of initiatives related to connected and automated

vehicle testing and deployments.

• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and expanding the use

of SPaT broadcast technology? Yes, we have the following programmatic elements in place. Hardware

specifications and design standards, as-needed CV infrastructure designers, prequalified installation contractors,

infrastructure hardware integrators, back office system and application development contracts, field infrastructure

maintenance contract, as needed- CV programmatic support contract, as-needed MAP data collection and

development contract, etc.

MDOT

Page 40: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

MDOT

Page 41: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information?

• TxDOT does not currently have any intersections that broadcast SPaT information

• There are a few cities that use TTS, inc. as a service to provide SPaT data. Currently, works with special equipped Audi

vehicles.

• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP message?

• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by

2020?

• TxDOT would like to have at least the 20 identified in the challenge

• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system?• Moving forward TxDOT would utilize controllers connected to a Central

TXDOT

Page 42: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage

run actuated/semi-actuated timing? TxDOT typically runs actuated signals that can be

coordinated when needed.

• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? 0

• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for

ongoing maintenance and operation? TBD

• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware? IN process of

setting up Blanket Purchase for RSUs

TXDOT

Page 43: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT

multimodal features:

• transit signal priority

• transit preemption

• emergency vehicle preemption

• Red-light violation warnings

• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,

what are they?

TXDOT

Page 44: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by

2020? If so, what are they?

• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge?

What about other connected and automated vehicle technology initiatives?

TxDOT is currently pursuing a Grant to do a Texas Connected Freight Corridor

• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and

expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology?

TXDOT

Page 45: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

TXDOT

Page 46: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information? 24

• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP

message? 100%

• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by

2020? Wow, there is a crystal-ball question! Probably 150.

• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system? 100%

UDOT

Page 47: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage

run actuated/semi-actuated timing? 100% run Actuated Timing

• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? None

• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for

ongoing maintenance and operation? Combination of in-house and contract. MAPs were

developed in-house. Contractor performed most other tasks, with oversight and input.

• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware? Yes

UDOT

Page 48: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT

multimodal features:

• transit signal priority 50%

• transit preemption 0%

• emergency vehicle preemption 0%

• Red-light violation warnings 0%

• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,

what are they? No

UDOT

Page 49: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by

2020? If so, what are they? Not yet

• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and

automated vehicle technology initiatives? Yes. Also Coalition for Safety Sooner. AV Legislation.

• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and

expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology? No for maintaining or upgrading. Yes for

expanding the use of SPaT.

UDOT

Page 50: Number of Future Notes Applications 1. We will test …...Detroit, USDOT SE MI Test Bed ‐ MI 110 100% 500 100% Estimate 30% fixed/70% acutuated No Combinat ion, but large percenta

UDOT