Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Presentation
byLocation
Number of
Deployed
Intersections
MAP
Message
Broadcast
PlannedCentral System
Connectivity
Fixed/Actuate
d SignalRTCMs
In‐
house/Co
ntract
Formal
Procurement
Process
Current ApplicationsFuture
ApplicationsNotes
CalTransPalo Alto,
CA11 11 6 20% all actuated Yes
Contract,
PATHNo
transit signal priority,
freight signal priority
Eco‐
Approach/D
eparture
1. We will test Red‐light violation warnings
application next Summer with Valeo. 2.
California Connected Vehicle Test Bed:
Established in Palo Alto in 2005 by Caltrans,
the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission, and PATH.First‐in‐the‐nation
facility for testing CV applications using
Dedicated Short Range Communications
(DSRC) on public roads.
Carnegie
Mellon
University
Pittsburgh,
Cranberry ‐
PA
35 11 200 100%
1/3 fixed; 2/3
real time
adaptive
NoContract,
CMU
FDOTTallahassee,
Florida24 24 100+ 0%
most semi‐
actuatedNo
Both
contract
and in‐
house
Yes
1. A second project with 27 intersections is
being planned for deployment in
Gainesville. 2. A CV Business Plan is being
developed. There are several CAV projects
being planned or designed.
MCDOT Anthem, AZ 11 11 100+ 100%all semi‐
actuatedNo
Both
contract
(U of A)
and in‐
house
Yes
MMITSS (I‐SIG: Intelligent
Traffic Signal System,
PREEMPT: Emergency
Vehicle Preemption with
Proximity Warning, TSP:
Transit Signal Priority,
FSP: Freight Signal
Priority, PED‐SIG: Mobile
Accessible Pedestrian
Signal System)
MMITSS,
Work Zone
1. Other CAV projects: Loop 101 Mobility
Project, CVISN Work Zone Project 2. Future:
6 Freeway Interchanges, 11 Freeway
Locations, 2000 Equipped Vehicles 3.Other
CV Application Prototypes in Anthem:
School zone alert, emergency vehicle alert,
construction zone alert, emergency vehicle
alert, incident ahead alert
TXDOT20
(minimum)
1. TxDOT does not currently have any
intersections that broadcast SPaT
information 2. There are a few cities that
use TTS, inc. as a service to provide SPaT
data. Currently, works with special
equipped Audi vehicles. 3. TxDOT is
currently pursuing a Grant to do a Texas
Connected Freight Corridor 4. TXDOT is in
the process of setting up Blanket Purchase
for RSUs.
UDOTSalt Lake
City, UT24 24 150 100% all actuated No
Both
contract
and in‐
house
Yes Transit signal priority
1. Combination of in‐house and contract.
MAPs were developed in‐house. Contractor
performed most other tasks, with oversight
and input. 2. CAV Support: Coalition for
Safety Sooner, AV Legislation. 3. No formal
plan for maintaining or upgrading. We have
plans for expanding the use of SPaT.
Michigan
DOT
Ann Arbor,
City of
Detroit,
USDOT SE
MI Test Bed ‐
MI
110 100% 500 100%
Estimate 30%
fixed/70%
acutuatedNo
Combinat
ion, but
large
percenta
ge
contract.
Yes (See note
2)
Multiple OEMs, and
Suppliers are actively
using the intersections for
application testing.
Transit
Signal
Priority,
transit
preemption,
emergency
vehicle
preemption
1. Ongoing maintenance and operations is
handed via contracts. 2. DTMB Procurement
for bulk hardware purchases. Contractor
procured for design projects. 3. We have
endorsed a number of initiatives related to
connected and automated vehicle testing
and deployments. 4. We have the following
programmatic elements in place. Hardware
specifications and design standards, as‐
needed CV infrastructure designers,
prequalified installation contractors,
infrastructure hardware integrators, back
office system and application development
contracts, field infrastructure maintenance
contract, as needed‐ CV programmatic
support contract, as‐needed MAP data
collection and development contract, etc.
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information? 11
• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP
message? 100%
• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by
2020? 17
• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system? 20%
CalTrans
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage
run actuated/semi-actuated timing? 0%; 100%
• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? 100%
• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for
ongoing maintenance and operation? ”Contract” (PATH); TBD
• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware? No
CalTrans
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT
multimodal features:
• transit signal priority 100%
• transit preemption 0%
• emergency vehicle preemption 0%
• Red-light violation warnings ??? This is an in-vehicle application. We will test this app next Summer with Valeo
• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,
what are they? TSP, and FSP
CalTrans
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by
2020? If so, what are they? Yes; Eco-Approach/Departure
• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and
automated vehicle technology initiatives? Yes; yes
• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and
expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology? No; this process still needs to be developed
CalTrans
California Connected Vehicle Test Bed• Established in Palo Alto in 2005 by Caltrans, the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission, and PATH• First-in-the-nation facility for testing CV applications using Dedicated Short Range
Communications (DSRC) on public roads• Located on El Camino Real (SR 82)
• 2.1 miles long• 11 consecutive intersections• 6 more planned• AADT of 50K vehicles/day• Busy transit corridor
CalTrans
24 intersections are equipped with DSRC Radio
Communications
Carnegie-Mellon University
Carnegie-Mellon University
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information?
• City of Pittsburgh – 24
• Cranberry PA - 11
• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP
message? 11 (in Cranberry)
• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by
2020?
• City of Pittsburgh - 200
• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system? 100%
Carnegie-Mellon University
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage
run actuated/semi-actuated timing? 1/3 fixed; 2/3 real-time adaptive
• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? 0%
• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for
ongoing maintenance and operation?
• CMU has installed and maintained
• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware?
Carnegie-Mellon University
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT
multimodal features:
• transit signal priority
• transit preemption
• emergency vehicle preemption
• Red-light violation warnings
• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,
what are they?
Carnegie-Mellon University
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by
2020? If so, what are they?
• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and
automated vehicle technology initiatives?
• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and
expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology?
Carnegie-Mellon University
Carnegie-Mellon University
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information?
• 24
• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP message?
• All
• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by
2020?
• 100+
• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system?
• None at this time, but plan to consider this effort.
FDOT
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage run actuated/semi-
actuated timing?• Magnolia – Tennessee runs free all day, fully actuated except min recall EB/WB. • Calhoun and Gadsden on Tennessee both run coordinated pretimed (ped recalls all directions) during the day. • All the rest run coordinated semi-actuated with min recall on main street and fully actuated on side street.
• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs?
• None
• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for ongoing maintenance and operation?
• Both in-house and contract support.
• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware?
• Yes; we followed the standard RFP process.
FDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT
multimodal features: None but being explored as a research project.
• transit signal priority
• transit preemption
• emergency vehicle preemption
• Red-light violation warnings
• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,
what are they?
• None at this stage.
FDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by
2020? If so, what are they?
• Yes; a second project with 27 intersections is being planned for deployment in Gainesville.
• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and
automated vehicle technology initiatives?
• There are several CAV projects being planned or designed.
• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and
expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology?
• A CV Business Plan is being developed.
FDOT
FDOT
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information? 11
• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP
message? 100%
• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by
2020? 100+
• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system? 100%
MCDOT
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage
run actuated/semi-actuated timing? 100% semi actuated
• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? None
• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for
ongoing maintenance and operation? In-House and through partnership with UofA
• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware? Yes
MCDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT
multimodal features:
• transit signal priority
• transit preemption
• emergency vehicle preemption
• Freight Priority
• Red-light violation warnings
• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,
what are they? MMITSS
MCDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by
2020? If so, what are they? MMITSS, Work Zone
• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and
automated vehicle technology initiatives? Yes, Loop 101 Mobility Project, CVISN Work Zone
Project
• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and
expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology? Draft developed
MCDOT
MCDOT
Faisal SaleemITS Branch Manager &
MCDOT SMARTDrive Program ManagerSM
Maricopa County Department of Transportation, Arizona
Anthem SMARTDrive Connected Vehicle Test Bed
ITS World Congress 2017
Traffic Signal Priority
• Multiple Requests• GPS Intersection Map• DSRC 2-way
communications between vehicles and signal (V2I)
Ramp Meter Priority• GPS Ramp Map• DSRC 2-way communications
between vehicles and controller (V2I)
Ad-Hoc Warning Beacon• GPS Roadway Map• DSRC communications
between vehicles and vehicles (V2V)
AZ511 Information via Backhaul
Early V2I Concept Development2007
Signal Preempt Demo
Ramp Meter Priority Demo
Early Testing (Parking Lot)2008
February 22, 2010First Live Intersection Test of Emergency Vehicle - IntelliDriveSM
67th Avenue and SouthernMaricopa County, AZ
Early Testing (Field)
Arizona Connected Vehicle Test BedAnthem, AZ (SMARTDrive)
Approx. 25,000 ResidentsApprox. 10,000 Vehicles
DSRC Installations:6 Signalized Intersection
Freeway Interchanges1
Freeway Locations1
2011
Arizona Connected Vehicle Test BedAnthem, AZ (SMARTDrive)
DSRC Installations:11 Signalized IntersectionVehicles5 Equipped VehiclesFuture6 Freeway Interchanges11 Freeway Locations2000 Equipped Vehicles
Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System (MMITSS) – CV Pooled Fund Project
• I-SIG: Intelligent Traffic Signal System• PREEMPT: Emergency Vehicle Preemption with
Proximity Warning• TSP: Transit Signal Priority • FSP: Freight Signal Priority • PED-SIG: Mobile Accessible Pedestrian
Signal System
2012
A Traffic Control System
MMITSS Basic Concepts
Section 1• Priority for
• Freight
Priority Hierarchy• Rail Crossings• Emergency Vehicles• Freight• Coordination• Transit
• BRT• Express• Local (Late)
• Passenger Vehicles• Pedestrians
Connected Vehicle Demonstration
9 9
Connected Vehicle Demonstration
Emergency Vehicles have priority over Transit
MMITSS Pedestrian Smartphone AppMMITSS Pedestrian Smartphone app
Allows Pedestrian to receive auditory and haptic feedback• Align with Crosswalk • Send Call for Service• Be given WALK • PedCLEAR Countdown• Guidance to stay in
Crosswalk• V2P Situational Awareness
Savari SmartCross (SBIR) Application Architecture Sara Khosravi, PhD Student
Other CV Application Prototypes in Anthem
Incident Ahead Alert!
Construction Zone Alert!
Emergency Vehicle Alert!
Emergency Vehicle Alert!
School ZoneAlert!
Intelligent Traffic Signal System
Other CV Applications
Work Zone
Freight Priority Corridor
L101 Mobility Project
ADOT SPaTCorridor
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information?
• 20 MDOT RSUs Deployed Operational (100 actively being deployed in SE MI)
• 40: UMTRI AACVTE (Ann Arbor, MI)
• 40 USDOT SE MI Test Bed
• 10: City of Detroit
• 110: Total in Operation
• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP message?• 100%
• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by 2020?• 500 Planned by end of Calendar year 2020.
• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system?• MDOT: 100%
MDOT
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage
run actuated/semi-actuated timing? Estimate 30%/70%
• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? 0%
• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for
ongoing maintenance and operation? Combination, but large percentage contract. Ongoing
maintenance and operations is handed via contracts.
• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware?
• Yes, DTMB Procurement for bulk hardware purchases. Contractor procured for design projects.
MDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT
multimodal features:
• transit signal priority: 0%
• transit preemption: 0%
• emergency vehicle preemption: 0%
• Red-light violation warnings: 0% (In-vehicle application deployed by vehicle manufacturer’s)
• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,
what are they? All intersections are broadcasting SPaT, MAP per SAE 2016 Standards. Multiple
OEMs, and Suppliers are actively using the intersections for application testing.
MDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by 2020? If so,
what are they? Transit Signal Priority, transit preemption, emergency vehicle preemption.
• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and automated vehicle
technology initiatives? Yes, and we have endorsed a number of initiatives related to connected and automated
vehicle testing and deployments.
• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and expanding the use
of SPaT broadcast technology? Yes, we have the following programmatic elements in place. Hardware
specifications and design standards, as-needed CV infrastructure designers, prequalified installation contractors,
infrastructure hardware integrators, back office system and application development contracts, field infrastructure
maintenance contract, as needed- CV programmatic support contract, as-needed MAP data collection and
development contract, etc.
MDOT
MDOT
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information?
• TxDOT does not currently have any intersections that broadcast SPaT information
• There are a few cities that use TTS, inc. as a service to provide SPaT data. Currently, works with special equipped Audi
vehicles.
• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP message?
• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by
2020?
• TxDOT would like to have at least the 20 identified in the challenge
• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system?• Moving forward TxDOT would utilize controllers connected to a Central
TXDOT
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage
run actuated/semi-actuated timing? TxDOT typically runs actuated signals that can be
coordinated when needed.
• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? 0
• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for
ongoing maintenance and operation? TBD
• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware? IN process of
setting up Blanket Purchase for RSUs
TXDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT
multimodal features:
• transit signal priority
• transit preemption
• emergency vehicle preemption
• Red-light violation warnings
• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,
what are they?
TXDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by
2020? If so, what are they?
• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge?
What about other connected and automated vehicle technology initiatives?
TxDOT is currently pursuing a Grant to do a Texas Connected Freight Corridor
• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and
expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology?
TXDOT
TXDOT
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• How many intersections do you currently have that broadcast SPaT information? 24
• What percentage of your current SPaT-equipped intersections currently broadcast a MAP
message? 100%
• How many fully SPaT-enabled intersections (i.e., SPaT & MAP broadcast) do you intend to have by
2020? Wow, there is a crystal-ball question! Probably 150.
• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections are connected to a central system? 100%
UDOT
Topic 1: SPaT Hardware Procurement & Deployment• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections run fixed signal timing? What percentage
run actuated/semi-actuated timing? 100% run Actuated Timing
• What percentage of your RSUs are currently broadcasting RTCMs? None
• Are your SPaT deployments done using in-house staff or contract support? What about for
ongoing maintenance and operation? Combination of in-house and contract. MAPs were
developed in-house. Contractor performed most other tasks, with oversight and input.
• Does your agency have a formal procurement process in place for SPaT hardware? Yes
UDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• What percentage of your SPaT-enabled intersections currently employ the following non-SPaT
multimodal features:
• transit signal priority 50%
• transit preemption 0%
• emergency vehicle preemption 0%
• Red-light violation warnings 0%
• Do you currently have any SPaT applications in use for your SPaT-enabled intersections? If so,
what are they? No
UDOT
Topic 3: Applications, Multimodal Integration, and Institutional Support• Do you have any future SPaT applications planned for use at your SPaT-enabled intersections by
2020? If so, what are they? Not yet
• Has your agency formally endorsed the SPaT Challenge? What about other connected and
automated vehicle technology initiatives? Yes. Also Coalition for Safety Sooner. AV Legislation.
• Do you have a formal plan or development process established for maintaining, upgrading, and
expanding the use of SPaT broadcast technology? No for maintaining or upgrading. Yes for
expanding the use of SPaT.
UDOT
UDOT