Upload
internet
View
105
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Numerical simulation of space-time Numerical simulation of space-time distribution of gases and particles emitted distribution of gases and particles emitted
during 1998 Roraima fires during 1998 Roraima fires
Rodrigo GevaerdRodrigo Gevaerd11 Saulo FreitasSaulo Freitas22 – Karla Longo – Karla Longo22
11 Universidade de São PauloUniversidade de São Paulo22 Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos/INPECentro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos/INPE
Vegetation fires in Roraima during 1998
Burned areas by biome (km2) Barbosa e Fearnside
(2000)
ATSR and TRMM fire countsMarch -1998
smoke
El Niño• SST anomaly at Equatorial Pacific: + 3oC.• Weak convective activity on north of Brazil.• Positive Anomalies of temperature and negative of relative humidity on Roraima.
SST anomaly of 1997/98 years ~ + 4 K
Vegetation fires in Roraima during 1998Meteorological condition - (El Niño)
• Boa Vista: 30,6 mm set/97-mar/98
• 8.7% of climatological mean 352mm
• Relative humidity < 60 %
•Agricultural burning was the cause of initial ignition
Rainfall – March, 1998 (mm)
< 50 mm
LBA-CLAIRE 1998 Experiment: Flight-8, March, 26 LBA-CLAIRE 1998 Experiment: Flight-8, March, 26 19981998
Measurement of CO and COMeasurement of CO and CO2 2 at high troposphereat high tropospherewith biomass burning “signature”with biomass burning “signature”
10 km
CO CO – – COCO22
300 ppbv CO
Flight-8Flight-8 Guiana and SurinameGuiana and Suriname
Origin of air mass on Suriname on March, 26 1998
• Planetary Boundary Layer (1km)
East cost of EUA
(Krejci et al., 2004)
• Low troposphere ~ 3 km:
Africa
(Formenti et al., 2001)
• High Troposphere ~ 10 - 12 km:
Roraima
(Freitas et al., 2000)
Some sub-grid process involved at Some sub-grid process involved at gases/aerosols transportationgases/aerosols transportation
3D Eulerian model grid 3D Eulerian model grid boxbox
massinflo
w
massoutflo
w
x ~ 10-100 kmx ~ 10-100 km y ~
10-
100
km
y ~ 1
0-10
0 km
z ~
100 –
1000
m
z ~
100 –
1000
m
source
diffusion diffusion in the in the PBLPBL
convective transport convective transport byby
shallow cumulusshallow cumulus
convective transport convective transport byby
deep cumulus deep cumulus
dry dry depositiodepositio
nn
wet wet depositiodepositio
nn
Model top Model top 20-30 km20-30 km
Eulerian Transport Model :Eulerian Transport Model :CATT-BRAMS Atmospheric ModelCATT-BRAMS Atmospheric Model
• in-line Eulerian transport model fully coupled to the atmospheric dynamics• suitable for feedbacks studies• tracer mixing ratio tendency equation
where:• adv adv grid-scale advectiongrid-scale advection• PBL turb PBL turb sub-grid transport in the PBLsub-grid transport in the PBL• deep conv deep conv sub-grid transport associated to the deep convection including sub-grid transport associated to the deep convection including
downdraft at cloud scaledowndraft at cloud scale• shallow conv shallow conv sub-grid transport associated to the shallow convectionsub-grid transport associated to the shallow convection• W W convective wet removal convective wet removal • RR sink term associated with dry deposition or chemical transformation sink term associated with dry deposition or chemical transformation• Q Q source emission.source emission.
2.5 ,PMPBL deep shallowadv turb conv conv
s s s s sW R Q
t t t t t
Biomass burning emissions Biomass burning emissions estimateestimate
[ ][ ] . . . ,veg
f fireveg vegM a
carbon density data
land use data
fire product
emission & combustion factors
mass estimation
CO source emission (kg m-
2 day-1 )
Emission parameterization for this case study
total burned area given by Barbosa e Fearnside (2000)
diurnal variability of burned area given by the same time variation of TOMS Aerosol Index on Roraima.
combine fire counts from ATSR and TRMM to provide fire location
firefires count
( ) ( )
( )( )
q total
q
A t F t A
A tA t
N
Mean burned area estimate per fire count
Emission parameterization for this case study
[ ]
_0_
( )( , , ) ,fire
firesGrid Box
r tQ i j t B E A
V
Model grid-box daily
emissions estimate:
Total daily emissions of CO and PM2.5 (Tg)
40CO
4,5PM2.5
Regional daily emission of CO (Tg) 23-mar-1998
Parameterized Deep Convective TransportParameterized Deep Convective Transport
updraft detrainmentupdraft detrainment downdraft detrainmentdowndraft detrainmentenvironment environment
subsidencesubsidence
0)
)
(
(1 or
deep
b
bconv
du u udeepcon
u u d d
v
ud d
u z
zs mw ss s s
m z
s
zs
tss s
z
Vertical section at lat 10SVertical section at lat 10S
vertical vertical levellevel 11.5 km 11.5 km
CO (ppbv)CO (ppbv)
Deep Convective Deep Convective Transport of COTransport of CO
Heig
ht
(m)
Heig
ht
(m)
1 km1 km
10 km10 km
Model simulation of the main convective systemson 18-march-1998
Numerical simulation of transport of CO with Numerical simulation of transport of CO with CATT-BRAMS during CLAIRE flight 8CATT-BRAMS during CLAIRE flight 8
height 1km height 11,7 kmheight 1km height 11,7 km
Fire emissions Fire emissions andand trade wind trade wind
deep deep convectionconvectionsmoke in PBLsmoke in PBL
anticyclonic anticyclonic flowflow smoke at high smoke at high
tropospheretroposphere
CLAIRE CLAIRE flight 8flight 8
trade trade windwind
Numerical simulation of transport of CO with Numerical simulation of transport of CO with CATT-BRAMS during CLAIRE flight 8CATT-BRAMS during CLAIRE flight 8
Model validation using flight-8 CO profile
Model validation using flight-8 CO
profile
----- CO observation----- CO modeled
Thanks for your attention
Validação do modelo CATT-BRAMS (with Plume Rise)
Conclusões
• Validação do modelo de transporte CATT-BRAMS 3.3 e da parametrização de fontes emissoras.
• Utilização de avanços em elementos importantes do modelo atmosférico: parametrização de cúmulos (cúmulos rasos e técnica training) e representação de superfície (umidade do solo).
• Importância da queimada de grandes proporções no dia 17/março (pois não houve necessidade de um ambiente previamente poluído) e o sistema convectivo formado na tarde do dia 18/março.
• Testes iniciais da técnica plume rise.
Transporte de emissões de queimadas
• advecção em níveis baixos,
• cúmulos rasos,
• cúmulos profundos,
• advecção em níveis altos (jatos),
• formação de novas partículas,
• processos químicos,
• deposição seca,
• remoção úmida, etc.
Transporte em escala continental
Fonte: Krejci et al. (2003)
Plume caracteristics Características da pluma de fumaça em altitude
(“assinatura”)
Fonte: Andreae et al. (2001)
• elevados valores de ΔCO/ΔCO2 acima de 9 km, típicos de eventos
extremos de queimadas em savanas,
• ausência de halocarbonetos de origem antropogênica,
• elevada concentração de metilcloratos.
CATT-BRAMS model simulation setup
• instante inicial: 12UTC 17 março 1998• instante final: 12UTC 28 março de 1998• número de pontos: (290,242,43)• níveis de solo: 7• resolução horizontal: 30 km• resolução vertical no primeiro nível: 120 m• razão de incremento: 1.1• valor máximo de Δz: 750 m• passo de tempo: 30 s• campos atmosféricos: ECMWF• umidade do solo: Gevaerd e Freitas (2005)• radiação de onda curta: Harrington (1997)• radiação de onda longa: Chen e Cotton (1983)• parametrização de cúmulos: Grell (1993) – técnica training
Emissão de poluentes
Destino do carbono queimado em Roraima entre dez/97 e mar/98 (106 Ton):
Emissão bruta de gases do efeito estufa em Roraima entre dez/97 e mar/98 (106 Ton):
Modelo de transporte CATT-BRAMS 3.3
Advecção na escala da grade
Convecção rasa
Turbulência na escala sub-grade
Convecção profunda
Remoção úmida do PM25
Deposição seca e processos químicos
Emissão associada com a queima de biomassa
Validação do modelo CATT-BRAMS
Fatores envolvidos no transporte (STILT)
(a) Transporte advectivo pelos alísios (baixos níveis),(b) Transporte vertical promovido por sistemas convectivos,(c) Transporte advectivo seguindo um anticiclone em altos níveis.
COM CONVECÇÃO SEM CONVECÇÃO
Fatores envolvidos no transporte