Upload
ismail
View
48
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Nursing Mathematics: What Skills Do Nursing Students Bring to Drug Calculations? Roslyn Gillies Learning Skills Unit Student Support Services University of Western Sydney. A bit about where I come from …. what I do …. and where I do it …. UWS – Sydney, NSW, Australia. A bit about UWS …. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
LSU 2006 1
Nursing Mathematics: What Skills Do Nursing Students Bring to Drug
Calculations?
Roslyn Gillies
Learning Skills UnitStudent Support Services
University of Western Sydney
LSU 2006 2
A bit about where I come from …
LSU 2006 3
LSU 2006 4
what I do …
LSU 2006 5
and where I do it …
LSU 2006 6
UWS – Sydney, NSW, Australia
LSU 2006 7
A bit about UWS …
Six campuses covering entire west of Sydney
36 000 students – 32 000 undergrads Larger campuses: Parramatta & Penrith Smaller: Hawkesbury & Blacktown Motto: ‘Bringing knowledge to life’ Emphasis on practical courses,
providing educational opportunities for students in the region
LSU 2006 8
How does Nursing Mathematicsfit with Ethnomathematics?
Several definitions of ethnomathematics …
… the study of mathematics which takes into consideration the culture in which mathematics arises
(University of Idaho website)
… the mathematical practices of identifiable cultural groups
(Ubiratan D’Ambrosio – first used in late 1960s)
LSU 2006 9
Human activities which require some form of mathematics
Architecture - construction Weaving – textiles and baskets Sewing – turning cloth/skins into clothing or shoes
that fit Agriculture – calendars to mark seasons, planning
for quantity and storage, layout of gardens and fields
Kinship relations Ornamentation – tilings and beadwork Spiritual and religious practices
(uidaho.edu website)
… and Nursing – dosage calculations!
LSU 2006 10
Mathematical skills nurses require
Computational skills fractions, decimals, percentages, ratio,
measurement, conversion between units
Conceptual Skills- ability to: set up the problem for calculation apply an appropriate solution method
LSU 2006 11
The culture and tradition ofteaching drug calculation
Early 1980s – Florence Nightingale’s hospital-trained apprentice system was replaced by higher education training
Occurred in countries such as: UK Canada USA Australia New Zealand
LSU 2006 12
Impacts of this change
‘Big bang’ curriculum revolution rather than incremental change
Emphasis on intellectual and higher- level thinking skills, problem solving
Mastery of basic principles rather than facts
Less time in clinical practice situation
LSU 2006 13
Other factors affecting drugcalculation instruction
Increasing student diversity Multidisciplinary nature of nursing maths
(maths applied in a nursing context) Medication calculation frequently a
stressful task performed on the ward No clear policy on whose responsibility it
is to develop and maintain nurses’ drug calculation competence
Little agreement on teaching methods
LSU 2006 14
Other factors (cont.)
Assumption that maths skills taught in the abstract will be successfully transferred to nursing context
Some nursing educators admit to poor maths skills and difficulty in teaching drug calculations
Limited opportunities for students to practice drug calculation skills
Reliance on formula methods that do not always result in students retaining skills
LSU 2006 15
The tradition of using formulamethods for drug calculation
Widespread use of formula methods
Examples of formulae taught:
Volume required to deliver a given mass:
Strength required Volume ofVolume =required stock strengthStock strength
(Gatford & Phillips, 2002, p. 44)
LSU 2006 16
Another formula taught …
Drip rate for Intravenous Infusion:
(Hext & Mayner, 2003, p. 80)
Volume (ml) Drop factor (drops/ml)Drops/Minute
Time (hours) Minutes (60 minutes/hour)
LSU 2006 17
Why are formulae taught?
“… to bypass the need to appropriate or understand any mathematical structure and to impose consistency on what were seen to be dangerous variations in strategy”
(Hoyles et al., 2001, p. 13)
LSU 2006 18
The dilemma – Advantages offormula methods
Standardised methods: one-size-fits-all
Easy to apply Plug in the numbers and turn the
handle to get the answer Don’t need to think too much
LSU 2006 19
Disadvantages of formulamethods
Little use of students’ existing problem-solving skills
Encourage belief that drug calculation is a separate branch of mathematics
Do little to encourage students to think through the problem and understand the calculation method
Do little to encourage estimation and checking strategies to ensure calculated dosage is reasonable
LSU 2006 20
What the literature says …
Some students find formulae difficult to use correctly
Formulae may be a cause of conceptual errors
Formula methods are frequently ineffective and result in: poor skill development poor retention of skills
LSU 2006 21
What the literature says … (cont.)
In workplace situations nurses make little use of formulae learnt
Instead, nurses use a variety of correct proportional reasoning methods that preserve the meaning of the problem situation
(Hoyles et al., 2001)
LSU 2006 22
The study
Subjects: 35 recently enrolled first year B Nursing students at UTS
Instruments: Test – 10 calculations (see OHT)
set in everyday contexts designed to parallel typical drug
calculation problems Questionnaire – demographic data
LSU 2006 23
Problem types simulated in test
Calculate: Number of tablets to deliver a given
mass Volume required to administer a given
mass, either:orally by injection
Intravenous medications: drip rate (drops per minute) time to run the infusion
LSU 2006 24
Some of the questions …
PRT item4. A 12.5 kilogram bag of flour lasts a
cook 5 days. How many days will 45 kilograms of flour last the cook?
Parallel DCT item4. On hand is Benadryl 12.5 mg per 5
mL. How many millilitres will you give if Benadryl 45 mg is ordered?
LSU 2006 25
PRT item5. An automatic drip feeder installed in an
aviary is to deliver 600 millilitres of water to the birds every 10 hours. If the feeder delivers 60 drops per millilitre, how many drops are delivered each minute?
Parallel DCT item 5. An intravenous drip is to deliver 600 mL
of normal saline over 10 hours. If the giving set delivers 60 drops per mL, what is the drip rate in drops per minute?
LSU 2006 26
PRT item7. A dripping kitchen tap loses 1 litre of water over 8
hours. It is established that 15 drops of water is equivalent to 1 millilitre. Calculate in drops per minute the rate at which the tap is losing water.
Parallel DCT item7. A patient is ordered 1 litre of normal saline over 8
hours. The intravenous giving set delivers 15 drops per mL. Calculate the drip rate in drops per minute?
LSU 2006 27
PRT item10. A car travelling on a country road is losing water
from the radiator at the rate of 25 drops per minute. The driver uses his last 600 millilitres of water to top up the radiator. How long will it take for this amount to leak out if 20 drops of water is equivalent to 1 millilitre?
Parallel DCT item10. An intravenous giving set is delivering an
infusion at the rate of 25 drops per minute. The patient is to have 600 mL of Hartmann’s. How long will the infusion take if the giving set delivers 20 drops per mL??
LSU 2006 28
Research questions
Before being exposed to drug calculation instruction of special formulae:
How well do students perform on tasks similar to drug calculations?
How successful are students in applying appropriate problem-solving methods to set up the problem for calculation?
What are the ‘native’ methods used by students to solve such problems?
LSU 2006 29
Scoring – two methods
Method 1 – right/wrong – test mark out of 10
Method 2 – score/3 for each item – test mark out of 30 1 mark: some progress 2 marks: correct method used 3 marks correct method and correct
answer
LSU 2006 30
Student profile
Female: 94% Ages: 17-48 mean 25.6 (sd 7.7) Mathematics backgrounds:
NSW HSC-level mathematics: 78% Year 10 (junior high) maths or less:
20% Maths studied after leaving school: 9%
NESB Language background: 12%
LSU 2006 31
Mean score
Method 1 (score/10)Mean score: 3.65 (sd: 2.25)
Method 2 (score/30)Mean score: 15.17 (sd: 7.57)
LSU 2006 32
Pass requirement:80% correct
Method 1:(score ≥ 8/10) Pass: 11% of students Fail: 89%
Method 2:(score ≥ 24/30) Pass: 17% Fail: 83%
LSU 2006 33
Pass requirement:100% correct
Methods 1 & 2:(Score: 10/10 or 30/30)
Pass: 0% Fail: 100%
LSU 2006 34
Deficits in students’ skills
Inability to set up problem for calculation(Blais & Bath, 1992; Rutherford, 1996)
Computational errors(Gillies, 1994; Gillham & Chu, 1995)
Errors in metric conversions(Rodger & Jones, 2000)
LSU 2006 35
Some of the problem-solvingmethods students used
Division operations Unitary method and adaptations Fraction of a quantity Proportion (formal set up) Ratio Proportional reasoning Rewrite rate in equivalent form
LSU 2006 36
No of items where correctmethod applied
01234567
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Number of items where correct method applied
No.
of s
tude
nts
nts
LSU 2006 37
Ability to apply correctmethod
On average, another 1.4 Qs per student where correct method used
For 26% of students, a further 3-4 Qs where correct method used
For 40% of students, at least 2 additional Qs where correct method used
LSU 2006 38
Items of particular interest
Those with greatest difference between % of students obtaining correct answer and % using correct method–Items 4, 5, 7, 10
ie many more students can apply a correct method than can get the correct answer
These include all three IV infusion problems – traditionally most difficult Qs
For these items, high incidence of causes, other than conceptual difficulties, that prevent success viz computational difficulties
LSU 2006 39
Item 5 – Melika’s working
LSU 2006 40
Item 5 – Nicola’s working
LSU 2006 41
Item 5 - Summary
Key to success:
Being able to convert: ml to drops hours to minutes
Being able to express stated ‘drip rate’ in appropriate equivalent forms
LSU 2006 42
Item 7 – Cate’s working
LSU 2006 43
Item 7 – Alison’s working
LSU 2006 44
Item 7 – Melika’s working
LSU 2006 45
Item 7 – Karen’s working
LSU 2006 46
Item 7 - Summary
Simplest process: Change ml to drops early Leave conversion of hours to mins
until the end (otherwise large numbers result)
Also valuable was the ability to express division in fraction form and cancel down (avoids long division)
LSU 2006 47
Item 10 – Karen’s working
LSU 2006 48
Item 10 – Melika’s working
LSU 2006 49
Item 10 - Summary
Both students used same method
Both had difficulty in arithmetic processes: Karen gained a zero is division
(2-step process) Melika lost a zero in same division (long
division)
LSU 2006 50
What analysis of students’ working suggests
Difficulties with IV problems are not always because of conceptual difficulties
Many students able to set up problem and apply appropriate method
Having applied an appropriate method, poor conceptual skills may prevent progress to correct answer
LSU 2006 51
Conclusions
On average, students able to apply correct method to half of the 10 items – even before any drug calculation instruction
Many students fairly well equipped to deal with even the most difficult drug calculation problems (IV problems)
Methods students use involve multiple steps that preserve meaning of problem (Hoyles et al., 2001)
When correct method applied, incorrect answers caused by poor arithmetic skills (Gillham & Chu, 1995; Cartwright, 1996)
LSU 2006 52
Recommendations fornursing educators
Need to reassess the appropriateness of focus on teacher-taught formulae for drug calculations
Avoid ‘killing off’ students’ existing problem-solving skills
Avoid fostering the belief that drug calculation is a separate and unrelated branch of maths
Encourage students who prefer to use ‘native’ methods and assist them in refining those methods
LSU 2006 53
Recommendations cont.
If formulae taught, ensure development of understanding: Unravel the multiple steps embodied in the formula Stress these steps may be performed separately
Encourage students to think flexibly and apply a range of problem-solving methods – leads to mathematically powerful students (Schoenfeld, 1992)
Further research needed in areas such as:
the conceptual skills of nursing students
students’ ‘native’ problem-solving methods and how they might apply them to drug calculation