Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NUTRIENT REDUCTION THROUGH THE USE OF ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT
RECOVERY
Rick Johnson Vice President, Market Development
1
Agenda • What is the trend • Technology description • Results • Economics
"Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a nightmare“ -Japanese Proverb
2
3
Level 5 Complete set of N and P criteria for all watertypes
Level 4 2 or more watertypes with N and/or P criteria
Level 3 1 watertype with N and/or P criteria
Level 2 Some waters with N and/or P criteria
Level 1 No N and/or P criteria
State Nitrogen and Phosphorus Criteria
Source: http://cfpub.epa.gov/wqsits/nnc-development/
4
1998
2016 (est)
5
1998 2013 2016 est
Level 5 4 4 5
Level 4 1 4 6
Level 3 2 4 4
Level 2 7 16 16
Level 1 42 28 25
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Numeric Criteria Trend: States & Territories
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
6
0.10
0.02
0.04
0.075 ????
The challenge: • Reducing targeted nutrients in a cost effective manner
Our solution: • View algae as a process…not a product • Sustainable, advanced nutrient recovery
o US Patent 8,101,080
The benefits: • Best in Class performance • No chemical sludge produced • Sustainable • Multi-generational, single technology
CO2 recycling & O2 release
Biomass co-product 7
SEPARATION
NUTRIENT RECOVERY
MIX
Clean Water
Algae Return
CO2
Algae Harvest Pure
oxygen
8
0.000
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
TP, m
g/L
Date
Controlled experiment: Nitrogen : Phosphorus relationship
Raw
NH3 dosing
Permeate
Target
9
TP TN NH3 TKN BOD TSS
Raw 2.247 16.706 4.167 10.904 27.000 15.487
Treated 0.028 6.872 0.210 1.578 4.000 0.609
0.000
10.000
20.000
30.000
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n, m
g/l
Municipal Summary
Raw Treated
Nutrient Recovery Test
Multi constituent performance
10
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Raw Separation Permeate Raw Separation Permeate
Res
ult
, mg/
L
Influence of separation on phosphorus reduction
TP Ortho
Run2 Run1
Membranes alone cannot remove dissolved phosphorus
11
5.2
11.75
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Current DMR ABNR
Dis
solv
ed
Oxy
gen
, mg/
L
Dissolved Oxygen
3 year DMR average (ECHO)
Median of 1 minute recordings from 2.5 month component evaluation
12
Municipal wastewater treatment
Constituent Before After % Removal
Total P (mg/L) 0.625 0.036 94.14%
TSS (mg/L) 12.18 0.24 98.00%
PCB (pg) 2141 144.1 93.00%
5 MGD Municipality Primarily residential 36,000 Residents TMDL: 0.075mg/L TP
13
14
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
9/20
/201
0
9/21
/201
0
9/22
/201
0
9/23
/201
0
9/24
/201
0
9/25
/201
0
9/26
/201
0
9/27
/201
0
9/28
/201
0
9/29
/201
0
9/30
/201
0
10/1
/201
0
10/2
/201
0
10/3
/201
0
10/4
/201
0
10/5
/201
0
10/6
/201
0
10/7
/201
0
10/8
/201
0
10/9
/201
0
10/1
0/20
10
10/1
1/20
10
10/1
2/20
10
10/1
3/20
10
10/1
4/20
10
10/1
5/20
10
M Ts W Th F Sa Su M Ts W Th F Sa Su M Ts W Th F Sa Su M Ts W Th F
CPF
EFF
Flow
, mgd
Tota
l Pho
spho
rus,
mg/
L
Post Falls Effluent AlgEvolve Effluent PF Flow, mgd
Second 21 day pilot: Average Raw TP: 0.151mg/L Average Permeate TP: 0.024mg/L
Results:
Constituent Before After % Removal
Total P (mg/L) 2.68 0.18 93.3%
Ammonia (mg/L) 0.60 0.05 91.7%
Total N (mg/L) 14.1 3.26 76.9%
Inland Empire Paper Company Results
3 MGD Pulp & Paper Process recycled paper 130 year old company TMDL: ~0.075mg/L TP
16
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
2-J
un
9-J
un
16
-Ju
n
23
-Ju
n
30
-Ju
n
7-J
ul
14
-Ju
l
21
-Ju
l
28
-Ju
l
4-A
ug
11
-Au
g
18
-Au
g
25
-Au
g
1-S
ep
8-S
ep
15
-Sep
22
-Sep
29
-Sep
6-O
ct
13
-Oct
20
-Oct
27
-Oct
3-N
ov
10
-No
v
17
-No
v
24
-No
v
1-D
ec
8-D
ec
15
-Dec
22
-Dec
29
-Dec
5-J
an
12
-Jan
19
-Jan
26
-Jan
2-F
eb
9-F
eb
Tota
l Ph
osp
ho
rus,
mg/
L
Total Phosphorus Trend
Raw Treated
Average Raw: 0.126mg/LAverage Permeate: 0.024mg/L
Separation Technology Vendor performance evaluations
17
Average Raw TP: 0.126mg/L Average Permeate TP: 0.024mg/L
45 MGD Municipality • 250,000 residents • Biosolids management for 14 communities Heavy Industrial Base (26 SIU’s) Seasonal Permit: 0.1mg/L TP & 5.0mg/L TN
18
Raw 0.366 0.155 0.182 0.33
Treated 0.020 0.005 0.029 0.038
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
Ave
rage
co
nce
ntr
atio
n, m
g/L
Total Phosphorus
Raw Treated
19
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3
TN, m
g/L
Weekly period
Total Nitrogen response
Raw Permeate
Additional nitrogen reduction
20
Permeate results below detection limit of hand held meter-results supplemented with 3rd party lab results
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
10/
31
11/
2
11/
5
11/
8
11/
11
11/
14
11/
17
11/
20
12/
9
12/
12
12/
15
12/
18
1/1
3
1/1
6
1/1
9
1/2
2
1/2
5
1/2
8
1/3
1
2/2
1
2/2
4
2/2
7
3/8
3/1
1
3/1
5
3/1
8
3/2
1
3/2
4
3/2
7
5/1
4
5/1
7
5/2
0
5/2
3
5/2
6
6/3
6/6
6/9
6/1
2
mg
/L P
Total Phosphorus Feed and Permeate
avg Feed Water TP avg Permeate TP 0.1 mg/L P Discharge Permit Feed Alpha Labs Permeate Alpha Labs
City Water BaselineNo light study
Hypo threshold
study
Average 3rd party lab (TP) • Feed: 0.285mg/L • Permeate: 0.02mg/L
Date COD, mg/L TOC, mg/L
Feed Permeate Feed Permeate
3/19 26 24 4.86 4.81
3/20 35 24 5.17 4.62
5/18 20 20 6.54 5.91
5/25 26 20 6.91 2.5
6/4 28 20 5.94 5.86
Average 27.00 21.60 5.88 4.74
Reduction 20.0% 19.4%
Numbers in red reported as “Non Detect”. Level of detection shown
22
23
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10/3
0/20
14
11/6
/201
4
11/1
3/20
14
11/2
0/20
14
11/2
7/20
14
12/4
/201
4
12/1
1/20
14
12/1
8/20
14
12/2
5/20
14
1/1/
2015
1/8/
2015
1/15
/201
5
1/22
/201
5
1/29
/201
5
2/5/
2015
2/12
/201
5
2/19
/201
5
2/26
/201
5
Tem
pera
ture
, F
Temperature influence
Feed fluid temp Avg PBR fluid Avg Outsid Air Temp
Feed PBR Air
Average 58.2 59.6 30.4
St Dev 2.63 2.54 11.14
Temperature, F
24
Average Biomass characteristics
Average of 25 municipal / industrial sources
N, % P2O5, % Potash, % Protein, % Fat, % Carb, %
Average 4.4 1.7 0.6 30.3 3.1 32.4
Low 0.6 0.3 0.1 11.4 0.2 6.1
High 7.8 3.4 2.3 48.3 7.8 63.2
Sample size 25 25 25 18 18 18
Typical applications 5 Year TAM, $M • Bio-plastics $478 - $638 • Soil amendment / composting aid $71 - $94 • Fuel source $2 - $3 • Others In development
Biomass Market
25
26
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
5 10 15 20 25 30
20
ye
ar P
W
Molar ratio, FeCl3
Break even technology comparison
MBR + chem P ABNR
Breakeven point for low P reduction at Molar Ratio = 8