Obama-Hates-Blacks: Judicial Misconduct Complaint involving Judges Becky Moore, Donald Haddock Jr. and Nolan Dawkins in the City of Alexandria, Virginia General District and Circuit

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evil Obama with an update on my planned destruction of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI. That darn VA Veteran filed a Judicial Complaint involving Judge Becky Moore and Donald Haddock, Jr. of the Alexandria General District Court and Judge Nolan Dawkins of the Alexandria Circuit Court. (Way to go Becky, Donnie and Nolie, by the way--keep them blacks in their place). Her complaint alleges a pattern-and-practice of discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI among other violations of the judicial code of conduct. Now, I cannot have this "black advocate" telling blacks that these white judges are violating a federal law when they refuse her services, or refuse to apply the law equally to her, because she is black. Gotta come up with some way to stop her. No boo-yayy.

Citation preview

  • 1

    Judicial Misconduct Complaint Judge Becky Moore and Donald Haddock, Jr.

    I, Bridget Allen whose Word is Truth, bring this complaint regarding Judge Becky Moore and Judge Donald Haddock, Jr. and I state the following:

    A. Judge Becky Moore Presiding Over The Alexandria General District Court, a Federal Financial Recipient, Denied Plaintiff Services Based on Her Race (Black)

    1. In connection with a case filed in the Alexandria General District Court, the Plaintiff requested subpoenas to defend her case, Allen v. Chase, Case #126678.

    2. The Alexandria General District Court Clerk Denied the Plaintiff Services under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title III, Denial of Access to Public Accommodations Based on Race 3. On three separate occasions, the Clerk of the Court and her staff denied the Plaintiff the ability to obtain the subpoenas. Exhibit #2 : Copy of page 1 of date-stamped copy dated February 7, 2013 for an application for a subpoena deuces tecum re: Craig Keaney, in Case #126678, Allen v. Chase. Exhibit #3: Copy of page 1 of date-stamped copy dated March 7, 2013 for an application for a subpoena deuces tecum re: Case #126678 , Allen v. Chase.

    B. Judge Becky Moore Presiding Over The Alexandria General District Court Judge Retaliated against the Plaintiff in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI

    4. Judge Becky Moore also denied the Plaintiff the ability to obtain the subpoenas, in a hearing where the judge purported to quash the subpoenas although none were ever issuedbased on a motion filed by opposing attorney J.P. McGuire Boyd, Jr. (VSB No. 72752) with the law firm Williams Mullen in Richmond, Virginia and the Plaintiff complained of racial discrimination in the matter. The judge ignored the Plaintiff based on her race. Exhibit #4: Judge Becky Moore, Order Granting Motion to Quash Subpoenas, dated February 2, 2013. 5. On knowledge and belief, the Alexandria General District Court Clerk and Judge Becky Moore denied the Plaintiff services because of her race and communicated ex parte with the opposing attorney J.P. McGuire Boyd, Jr. (VSB No. 72752), in a concerted plan to deny Plaintiff a subpoenaand to deceive the Plaintiff, pro se litigant, that the judges actions were procedurally proper.

    B) Judge Donald Haddock, Jr. at the Alexandria General District Court Allows Abuse of Process and Harassment by Attorney Kevin Kernan to Issue Void Order, Gain Entry into a Defendant/Litigants Home and Attempt to Obtain Legal Fees

    6. In 2013, As a result of the denial of services, Plaintiff wrote two letters to the Clerk of the Court to file a discrimination complaint under Titles III and VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she believed that along with denying her services, the court specifically Judge Donald Haddock, Jr. knew or had reason to know that attorney Kevin Kernan was using the

  • 2

    legal process to harass and obtain money from her and other residents at the Park Place Condominium, by among other things: a) issuing invalid documents to lead them to believe that their appearance in court was required (See Case # GV13002193-00, Park Place v. Bridget Allen) and b) issuing void judgments concerning them to obtain: 1) their compliance with specific acts on behalf of the board of directors at Park Place, such as obtaining entrance into their apartments, and 2) money for committing various violations, as determined by the board of directors. Exhibit #5: Letter from Bridget Allen to Clerk of the Court JeAnne Rosson, dated November 13, 2013, 2013 and date-stamped by a clerk of the Alexandria General District Court on November 14, 2013, RE: Second Request for Information on Issuance of Documents, Receipt of Federal Funds and Request of Procedures to File an Anti-Discrimination Complaint Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Titles III and VI (Retaliation) with Attached letter from Bridget Allen to Clerk of the Court JeAnne Rosson, dated April 23, 2013, RE: Request for Information on Issuance of Documents and Receipt of Federal Funds for the Alexandria General District Court. United States Postal Service Tracking #9400109699937658362310.

    7. The Court Clerk refused to respond to the Plaintiffs requests, or to intake the Plaintiffs administrative Civil Rights Act of 1964 complaints.

    C) Judge Becky Moore Presiding over The Alexandria General District Court, a Federal Financial Recipient, Confiscated Plaintiff's Title VI Racial Discrimination and Retaliation Complaints (Administrative Claims) on at least Seven (7) Occasions

    8. In a letter dated November 13, 2013, Plaintiff also wrote to the Clerk of the Court and to Judge Becky Moore to report the continued violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 regarding the Plaintiff and others at Park Place, by those in positions of authority at the court; however the clerk and Judge Becky Moore refused to respond, or to forward the Plaintiffs complaints to the appropriate Federal Agency to respond to the Title VI complaints. Exhibit #6: Affidavit from Bridget Allen to Clerk of the Court JeAnne Rosson, dated November 13, 2013, 2013 and date-stamped by a clerk of the Alexandria General District Court on November 14, 2013, RE: Affidavit Reporting Events RE: Judge Becky Moore and Judge Donald Haddock Jr., and Others to Violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Titles III and VI).

    9. In February 2014, as a result of the courts denial of information on and refusal to intake and process the Title VI complaints, Plaintiff wrote four additional Virginia Freedom of Information Act (VA FOIA or Virginia FOIA) requests, See Virginia Freedom of Information Act, VA. CODE ANN. 2.2-3700 et seq. and delivered them to the court in various ways, such as: 1) hand delivery, 2) via United States mail certified return receipt and 3) via email to the Clerk of the Court and the judge, to obtain the policies and procedures which she believed should be available to her, to allow her to file an administrative claim under the Civil Rights Act 1964, Titles III and VI. Exhibit #7: Letter from Bridget Allen to Judge Becky Moore, dated February 12, 2014, RE: FOURTH FOIA Request, Request for FOIA Policy and Title VI Complaint Form and Procedures, United States Postal Mail Certified-Return Receipt #7013-2630- 0001-6358-9024 (attachments include the previous FOIA requests which Plaintiff attempted to deliver in-person and via e-mail).

  • 3

    10. The Court Clerk and the Judge Becky Moore refused to respond to the Plaintiffs Virginia FOIA requests, or to intake the Plaintiffs administrative complaints in compliance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its implementing regulations. 11. Also, in 2014 a witness observed that when the Plaintiff presented a clerk of the Court, Hope Mayfield with her in-person FOIA request for among other information, a complaint process and forms to use to file a complaint under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Titles III and VI the clerk: (1) refused to accept the written complaint and (2) refused to provide the Title VI forms and complaint procedures. Exhibit #8: Affidavit of Eric Graham, dated February 20, 2014. 12. On or around June 25, attorney Samuel I. White, PC caused to be posted on my apartment door,

    what appears to be a summons executed a clerk, at the Alexandria General District Court, in case

    #14-3309, Vendor Resource Management, v. Allen. The summons did not accompany a notice of

    hearing, or complaint, so that I might know the charges. In addition, the summons is not

    stamped by the court, nor is the signature of the clerk legible.

    13. On knowledge and belief, Judge Becky Moore and Judge Donald Haddock are conspiring to issue

    process against me in retaliation for recent cases I filed concerning what I believe to be their

    violations of federal anti-discrimination laws and possibly criminal laws, in the United States Court

    of Federal Claims regarding:

    a) The Alexandria General District Courts confiscation of my physical Title VI complaints,

    under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Titles III and IV, as authorized by the federal government,

    without just compensation, Case #, 14-178C in the United States Court of Federal Claims and

    b) the Veterans Administrations and Vendor Resource Managements taking of my private

    property in violation of the Fifth Amendment, without just compensation, Case #13-642C.

    Exhibit # 9: Summons, Case # 14-3309, Vendor Resource Management, v. Allen. On knowledge and belief, the judges have violated respectively, the following judicial canons: CANON 2. A JUDGE SHALL AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL OF THE

    JUDGE'S ACTIVITIES. The test for appearance of impropriety is whether the conduct would create

    in reasonable minds a perception that the judge's ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with

    integrity and impartiality is impaired.

    Judge Becky Moores Violations: Paragraphs: All Judge Donald Haddock, Jr.s Violations: Paragraphs: 6-13 CANON 3. A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY. (2) A judge shall be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it. A judge shall not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor or fear of criticism.

  • 4

    A) Judge Becky Moores Violations: Paragraphs: All B) Judge Donald Haddock, Jr.s Violations: Paragraphs: 6

    (4) A judge shall be patient, dignified and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity, and shall require similar conduct of lawyers, and of staff, court officials and others subject to the judge's direction and control.

    A) Judge Becky Moores Violations: Paragraphs: 4 - 11

    B) Judge Donald Haddock, Jr.s Violations: Paragraphs: 6

    (5) A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. A judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct manifest bias or prejudice, including but not limited to bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status, and shall not permit staff, court officials and others subject to the judge's direction and control to do so. This Section 3B(5) does not preclude proper judicial consideration when race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status, or similar factors, are issues in the proceeding.

    A) Judge Becky Moores Violations: Paragraphs: All B) Judge Donald Haddock, Jr.s. Violations: Paragraphs: 6

    (7) A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person's lawyer, the right to be heard according to law. A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties concerning a pending or impending proceeding except that: (a) Where circumstances require, ex parte communications for scheduling, administrative purposes or emergencies that do not deal with substantive matters or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties concerning a pending or impending proceeding except that:

    A) Judge Becky Moores Violations: Paragraphs: 4, 12-13

    B) Judge Donald Haddock, Jr.s Violations: Paragraphs: 6, 12-13

    C. Administrative Responsibilities. (1) A judge shall diligently discharge the judge's administrative responsibilities without bias or prejudice and maintain professional competence in judicial administration, and shall cooperate with other judges and court officials in the administration of court business. (2) A judge shall require staff, court officials and others subject to the judge's direction and control to observe the standards of fidelity and diligence that apply to the judge and to refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice in the performance of their official duties.

    A) Judge Becky Moores Violations: Paragraphs: All B) Judge Donald Haddock, Jr.s Violations: Paragraphs: 6, 12-13

    Disciplinary Responsibilities. (1) A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of these Canons should take appropriate action. A judge having knowledge that another judge has committed a violation of these Canons that

  • 5

    raises a substantial question as to the other judge's fitness for office should inform the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission.

    A) Judge Becky Moores Violations: Paragraphs: 4, 6 B) Judge Donald Haddock, Jr.s. Violations: Paragraphs: Not Applicable

    (2) A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility should take appropriate action. A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility that raises a substantial question as to the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects should inform the Virginia State Bar.

    A) Judge Becky Moores Violations: Paragraphs: 4 B) Judge Donald Haddock, Jr.s. Violations: Paragraphs: 6

    E. Disqualification. (1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned,

    A) Judge Becky Moores Violations: Paragraphs: 4, 12-13 B) Judge Donald Haddock, Jr.s. Violations: Paragraphs: 6, 12-13

    CONCLUSION: I have reason to believe that this tribunal will not adequately discipline the afore-mentioned judges.

    Therefore it is my duty, first to reveal this egregious injustice to the public and also to place the

    curse of my ancestors upon them. So, in keeping the promise, I Bridget Allen whose Word is Truth,

    state thus:

    In the name of my ancestors, known and unknown whose bodies your ancestors harmed and whose

    ignorance they cultivated in your orders as priests, to take advantage of them so that you might live

    and rule: I curse you Becky Moore and Donald Haddock, Jr., may the harm youve caused return to

    you now.

    In the name of the people who have appeared before your court and who sought assistance and

    truth, but you repaid them with abuse, lies and theft: I curse you Becky Moore and Donald

    Haddock, Jr., may the harm youve caused return to you now.

    In the name of the Goddess in all her forms: Maat, Auset, Isis, Sekhmet who is Truth and who

    destroys evil, who speaks through my Word now and in the blink of Herus Eye destroys all you love

    and hold dear and all who have aided, encouraged, or ignored your arrogance, greed and treachery:

    I curse you Becky Moore and Donald Haddock, Jr., may the harm youve caused return to you now.

    In the name of the Goddess Seshet, by your own heart and pen you are destroyed. Where the priests

    sign any paper to unjustly dismiss this complaint, or you sign another unjust order, and fail in Truth

    to repent, you seal your fate. Justice is done.

    Bridget/s/