19
Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

  • View
    218

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants

Cara Rakowski NRL

J. Martin Laming NRL

Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Page 2: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Hα emission from the shock front

• Non-radiative shocks: primarily Hα emission from the immediate shock front

• Radiative shocks: show O III, N II, S II etc from recombination zone downstream

Raymond et al. 2003, ApJ 584, 770

Cygnus Loop

Page 3: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Ghavamian et al. 2002, ApJ 572, 888

Hbroad H

narrow H

H

HH

Hα narrow and broad components

Page 4: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Ghavamian et al. 2002, ApJ 572, 888

Hbroad H

narrow H

H

HH

Hα narrow and broad components

Page 5: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Ghavamian et al. 2002, ApJ 572, 888

broad H

narrow H

H

HH

Hα narrow and broad components

neutral H entering the shock:

• excited by electrons or protons, emits narrow Hα

• charge exchanges with shock heated protons creating hot neutrals that emit broad Hα

• V FWHM, broad → Tp

• IB/IN → σx, σi → Te, Tp

(Chevalier, Kirshner & Raymond 1980 ApJ 235, 186)

Page 6: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Te/Tp = 0.1

Te/Tp = 0.5

Te/Tp = 1.0

IB/IN (vshock, Te/Tp)

van Adelsberg, Heng, McCray & Raymond astro-ph/0803.2521v3

optically thick Lyman α vshock = 635 km s-1

Ghavamian et al. 2001 ApJ 547, 995

electron impact excitation and ionization are peaked

functions of Te

decreasing charge exchange at high velocities

Page 7: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

VFWHM,broad(Te/Tp, vshock)

van Adelsberg, Heng, McCray & Raymond astro-ph/0803.2521v3

At high vshock most protons are too fast to charge exchange, limiting further broadening.

Page 8: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

MA for 3G 105K 1cm-3 50% neutral gas

(Te/Tp)0 (1/vs2)

Tp vs2

Te=constant

Ghavamian, Laming & Rakowski, 2007 ApJ 654, L69

Results from Hα observations of Supernova Remnants

Page 9: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

more sophisticated treatment of post-charge exchange distribution functions

van Adelsberg, Heng, McCray & Raymond astro-ph/0803.2521v3

Page 10: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

cosmic ray lower hybrid waves

upstream rest frame

vs

k||2/k

2 me/mp

B

vgroup vsvphase

2=e p (e,p eB/me,pc)

L~ /vs

t= /vs2

meve2 = meD||t

D|| Bvs2 (E2)

meve2 B

1/Bheating independent of heating independent of

both vboth vss and B! and B!

1 ───

2

1 ───

2

1 ───

2

e ─

p+

Ghavamian, Laming, & Rakowski 2007Figure 2

Page 11: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Te/Tp v2shock, Teconstant?

Lower hybrid waves (LHW) in a cosmic ray (CR) precursor

• CR diffusion length scale for heating, and LHW vgroup vshock allows Te independent of vshock and B.

• LHW growth requires some B w.r.t shock normal.

• If B generated by B-field amplification, then at MA = 60 ---12, LHW growth will exceed modified Alfvén wave growth.

Ghavamian, Laming & Rakowski, 2007 ApJ 654, L69 (first estimates)

Rakowski, Laming & Ghavamian 2008 ApJ 684, 348 (kinetic growth rate)

Page 12: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

extra slides

Page 13: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

DEM L71, new long-slit spectra confirm IB/IN too low in most regions to be matched by current models.We suspect H is being ionized and excited by hot electrons in the CR precursor

Page 14: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Growth Rate Comparison • lower hybrid wave

kinetic growth rate• non-resonant modified

Alfvén wave growth rate

• maximum Alfvén wave growth rate

• Mach number at which lower-hybrid waves grow faster than modified Alfvén waves

for shocks:

Page 15: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Cosmic-ray precursor

• non-resonant modified Alfvén waves amplify B

• MA decreases near shock

• lower-hybrid wave growth takes over, heating the resonant electrons

parallel

perpendicular Figure 3

Page 16: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Solar Wind Shocks

• interplanetary bow shocks in the solar wind show a relationship closer to Te/Tp 1/v .

• this could be explained if the cosmic rays were non-relativistic picking up an extra factor of vs/c in the diffusion coefficient.Figure 4

data from Schwartz et al 1986

Page 17: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Ultimate Goal: detect SEPs by their effect on thermal electrons

Multi-slit instantaneous EUV/UV Spectra

1.8 2.0 2.4 2.7

Mission Concept: see poster Newmark et al. SP43A-07

Page 18: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

Ultimate Goal: detect SEPs by their effect on thermal electrons

Predicting ground-level SEP events

• Primary mission, detect seed particles prior to CME eruption available for acceleration to high energy SEPs

• Simultaneously the O VI and He II lines can be modeled to determine the electron to ion temperature ratio to test for rapid electron heating indicative (under our model) of SEP generated lower-hybrid waves

Chianti simulated SOCS spectra

UVCS spectrum from Raymond et al 2000, sees

wings from shock heated ions

Page 19: Observational Constraints on Electron Heating at Collisionless Shocks in Supernova Remnants Cara Rakowski NRL J. Martin Laming NRL Parviz Ghavamian STScI

DEM L71, new long-slit spectra confirm IB/IN too low in most regions to be matched by current models.We suspect H is being ionized and excited by hot electrons in the CR precursor