OCC UPA TIONAL A SUR VEY REPORT · 2011. 5. 14. · ad-a253 780 air foce dtic occ upa tional a sur vey report security police career ladders afscs 811x0, 811x2, and 811x2a afpt 90-811-m582

AD-A253 780

AIR FOCE DTIC

OCC UPA TIONAL A

SUR VEY REPORT

SECURITY POLICE CAREER LADDERS

AFSCs 811X0, 811X2, AND 811X2A

AFPT 90-811-M582 66

OCCUPATIONAL ANALYSIS PROGRAMUSAF OCCUPATIONAL MEASUREMENT SQUADRON

AIR TRAINING COMMANDRANDOLPH AF13, TEXAS 78150-5000

APPROVED FOR PUBIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTIJON UNLI[NITED

9 2

4.i i )

DISTRIBUTION FORAFSC 811XX OSR AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

STANDARD DISTRIBUTION

811XX 811XO 811X2 811X2A BlIXX811XX ANL TNG TNG TNG JOBOSR EXT* EXT EXT EXT IN

AFIA/IMP 2AFMPC/DPMRPQ1 2AFMPC/DPMRAD5 1AL/HRD/HRMM 2 Im I m ImAL/HRT/DOS I Im lm/lh Im/lh lm/lhANGSC/SEP(ANDREWS AFB MD 20331-6008) 1 1 1 1ARMY OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY BRANCH ICCAF/AYX 1DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 2HQ ACC/DPATD 3 3 3 3HQ AFDW/SP(BOLLING AFB WASH DC 20332-5000) 1 1 1 1HQ AFIC/OPATO 3 3HQ AFMC/DPUE 3 3 3 3HQ AFRES/SP(ROBINS AFB GA 30148-6001) 1 1 1 1HQ AFSOC/DPAT 3 3 3 3HQ AFSPA/SPLT(KIRTLAND AFB NM 87117-5000) 4 4 4 4 2HQ AFSPACECOM/DPAE 3 3 3 3HQ AMC/DPATJ 3 3 3 3HQ ATC/DPAEO 3 3 3 3HO ATC/TTOT 2 1 1 1HQ AU/DPAT(MAXWELL AFB AL 36112-5001) 3 3 3HQ PACAF/DPAE 3 3 3 3HQ USAF/SP 1 1 1 1HQ USAF/DPPT 1HQ USAFA/DPM(USAF ACADEMY CO 80840-5001) 3 3HQ USAFE/DPAD 3 3 3 3NODAC 1Standards Division (MAGTEC) IUSAFOMS/OMDQ 1USAFOMS/OMYXL 10 2m 5 5 5 103250 TSS/TTOA 10 2 6 63250 TCHTG/TTS 1 1 1 1 u

0

m = microfiche onlyh = hard copy only By ...................

* Number refers to a set (811X0/811X2/811X2A) Distribution I

Availability Codes

DIC quarIr1 ?-DD"t Avail and/orDist Special

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGENUMBER

PREFACE. ... ........ ....... ........ ..... viii

SUMMARY OF RESULTS .. .. ........ ........ ........ ix

INTRODUCTION .. .. ........ ..... .. ............ 1

Background. ... ....... ........ .......... 1

SURVEY METHODOLOGY. .. ..... ........ ........ .... 2

Inventory Development .. .. ........ ........ .... 2Survey Administration .. .. ........ ........ .... 3Survey Sample. .. ..... ........ ........ .... 4Task Factor Administration. ... ....... .......... 4

SECTION I

SPECIALTY JOBS (Career Ladder Structure) .. ... ........ .... 7

Overview of Specialty Jobs. ... ....... .......... 8Group Descriptions .. ...... ....... .......... 10Comparisons of Specialty Jobs .. .. ............. ...... 21Comparison of Current Group Descriptions to Previous.....Survey Findings. ... ....... ........ ....... 22

SECTION II

ANALYSIS OF 811X0 DAFSC GROUPS. .. ..... ........ ..... 25

Skill Level Descriptions *.....................* * *' ' 25Summary. .. ..... ........ ........ ....... 30

ANALYSIS OF 811X0 AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS. ... ........ 30

811X0 TRAINING ANALYSIS .. ...... ....... .......... 34

First-Enlistment Personnel. ... ........ ......... 35Training Emphasis and Task Difficulty Data .. .... ....... 35Specialty Training Standard (STS) .. ... ........ .... 46Plan of Instruction (POI) .. ... ........ ......... 50

ANALYSIS OF MAJOR COMMANDS (NAJCOM). ... ........ ....... 50

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

PAGENUMBER

SECTION III

ANALYSIS OF 811X2 DAFSC GROUPS .. .. ........ .......... 53

Skill Level Descriptions .. ...... ........ ..... 53Summary. .. .... ........ ........ ........ 59

ANALYSIS OF 811X2 AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS. ... ........ 59

811X2 TRAINING ANALYSIS .. ...... ........ ......... 59

First-Enlistment Personnel. .... ........ ........ 59Training Emphasis and Task Difficulty Data. ... ......... 61Specialty Training Standard (STS). .. ...... ......... 61Plan of Instruction (POI) .. ... ........ ......... 72

ANALYSIS OF MAJOR COMMANDS (MAJCOM). .... ....... ...... 76

SECTION IV

ANALYSIS OF 811X2A DAFSC GROUPS. ... ........ ......... 76

Skill Level Descriptions .. ...... ........ ..... 81Summary. .. ..... ........ ........ ....... 81

ANALYSIS OF 811X2A AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS .. ... ....... 85

811X2A TRAINING ANALYSIS. .. ..... ........ ......... 85

First-Enlistment Personnel. .... ........ ........ 85Training Emphasis and Task Difficulty Data. ... ......... 88Paragraph 23, Specialty Training Standard (STS) .. .. ....... 88Plan of Instruction (POI) .. ... ........ ......... 88

ANALYSIS OF MAJOR COMMANDS (MAJCOM). .... ......... .. .... 98

SECTION V

JOB SATISFACTION ANALYSIS .. ...... ........ ........ 98

IMPLICATIONS.................. .. ..... . . .... .. .. .. .. . .. 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS(Tables, Figures, Appendices)

PAGENUMBER

TABLE I - COMMAND DISTRIBUTION OF 811XX PERSONNEL .............. 5TABLE 2 - PAYGRADE DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEY SAMPLE ..... .......... 6TABLE 3 - SELECTED BACKGROUND DATA FOR SPECIALTY JOB CLUSTERS AND

INDEPENDENT JOBS .............. . 11-13TABLE 4 - JOB SPECIALTY COMPARISONS BETWEEN CURRENT AND 1984 SURVEYS. 23-24TABLE 5 - DISTRIBUTION OF 811X0 DAFSC GROUP MEMBERS ACROSS SPECIALTY

JOBS ..... .... ........................... ... 26TABLE 6 - AVERAGE PERCENT TIME SPENT PERFORMING DUTIES BY 811XO

DAFSC GROUPS ..... .. ....................... ... 27TABLE 7 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 81130/81150 PERSONNEL

(N=2,887) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28TABLE 8 - TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN DAFSCs 81130/81150

AND 81170 PERSONNEL (PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING) .. ..... 29TABLE 9 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 81170 PERSONNEL (N=1,028) 31TABLE 10 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 81199/81100 PERSONNEL

(N=118) ......... . ... ................... .. 32TABLE 11 - TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN DAFSC 81170 AND

81199/CEM CODE PERSONNEL (PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING). . 33TABLE 12 - RELATIVE TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY 811X0 FIRST-ENLISTMENT

PERSONNEL (N=1,465) .... .................... 37TABLE 13 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 811XO FIRST-ENLISTMENT

PERSONNEL (N=1,465) .... .................... 38TABLE 14 - NUMBER OF TIMES ARMED PHYSICAL APPREHENSION AND RESTRAINT

TECHNIQUE (PART) USED DURING LAST 12 MONTHS (OTHER THANTRAINING) BY 811X0 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL (N=1,465). 39

TABLE 15 - NUMBER OF TIMES UNARMED PART USED DURING LAST 12 MONTHS(OTHER THAN TRAINING) BY 811X0 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL(N=1,465) ..... ... ........................ ... 39

TABLE 16 - PRESENT ROLE IN ABGD FOR 811X0 FIRST-JOB AND FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL ..... ................... .... 40

TABLE 17 - WEAPONS CARRIED OR UTILIZED BY 5 PERCENT OR MORE OF 811X0FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL (N=1,465) ..... ........... 41

TABLE 18 - SECURITY POLICE TACTICS OR PROCEDURES USED OR PRACTICEDBY 10 PERCENT OR MORE OF 811X0 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL(N=1,465) ...... .. ......................... 42

TABLE 19 - EQUIPMENT USED OR OPERATED BY 10 PERCENT OR MORE OF 811X0FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL (N=1,465) ........... 43

TABLE 20 - TECHNICAL TASKS RATED HIGHEST IN TRAINING EMPHASIS (TE)BY 811X0 PERSONNEL .......... ... .. . 44

TABLE 21 - TASKS RATED HIGHEST IN TASKS DIFFICULTY (TD).BY 811X4PERSONNEL ....... ....................... . . 45

TABLE 22 - 811X0 STS ELEMENTS NOT SUPPORTED BY SURVEY DATA (LESS THAN20 PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING) .................. 47-48

TABLE 23 - TECHNICAL TASKS PERFORMED BY 20 PERCENT OR MORE 811XO GROUPMEMBERS AND NOT REFERENCED TO THE 811X0 STS . ....... ... 49

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)(Tables, Figures, Appendices)

PAGENUMBER

TABLE 24 - EXAMPLES OF 811XO POI BLOCKS REFLECTING LOW 811X0 FIRST-ENLISTMENT TASK PERFORMANCE (LESS THAN 30 PERCENTRESPONDING) ..... ..... ....................... 51

TABLE 25 - PERCENTAGE OF TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY 811X0 MAJCOM GROUPS 52TABLE 26 - DISTRIBUTION OF 811X2 DAFSC GROUP MEMBERS ACROSS SPECIALTY

JOBS ..... ... ........................... .. 54TABLE 27 - AVERAGE PERCENT TIME SPENT PERFORMING DUTIES BY 811X2

DAFSC GROUPS ................................... .. 55TABLE 28 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 81132/81152 PERSONNEL

(N=1,220) ..................................... 56TABLE 29 - TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN DAFSCs 81132/81152

AND 81172 PERSONNEL (PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING) ....... 57TABLE 30 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 81172 PERSONNEL (N=508) 58TABLE 31 - TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN DAFSC 81172 AND

81199/CEM CODE PERSONNEL (PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING). . 62TABLE 32 - RELATIVE TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT

PERSONNEL (N=695) ...... ..................... ... 63TABLE 33 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT

PERSONNEL (N=695) ...... ..................... ... 64TABLE 34 - NUMBER OF TIMES ARMED PHYSICAL APPREHENSION AND RESTRAINT

TECHNIQUE (PART) USED DURING LAST 12 MONTHS (OTHER THANTRAINING) BY 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL (N=695) 65

TABLE 35 - NUMBER OF TIMES UNARMED PART USED DURING LAST 12 MONTHS(OTHER THAN TRAINING) BY 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL(N=695) ........... ........................ ... 65

TABLE 36 - PRESENT ROLE IN ABGD FOR 811X2 FIRST-JOB AND FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL ..... ... ................... 66

TABLE 37 - WEAPONS CARRIED OR UTILIZED BY 10 PERCENT OR MORE OF 811X2FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL (N=695) ................ .. 67

TABLE 38 - SECURITY POLICE TACTICS OR PROCEDURES USED OR PRACTICED BY10 PERCENT OR MORE OF 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL(N=695) ...... .. .......................... .. 68

TABLE 39 - EQUIPMENT USED OR OPERATED BY 10 PERCENT OR MORE OF 811X2FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL (N=695) ......... .... 69

TABLE 40 - TECHNICAL TASKS RATED HIGHEST IN TRAINING EMPHASIS (TE)BY 811X2 PERSONNEL .................. 70

TABLE 41 - TASKS RATED HIGHEST IN TASK DIFFICULTY (TD) BY 811X2PERSONNEL ..... ... ....................... . 71

TABLE 42 - 811X2 STS ELEMENTS NOT SUPPORTED BY SURVEY DATA (LESS THAN20 PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING) .... .............. 73-74

TABLE 43 - TECHNICAL TASKS PERFORMED BY 20 PERCENT OR MORE 811X2 GROUPMEMBERS AND NOT REFERENCED TO THE 811X2 STS ... ....... 75

TABLE 44 - EXAMPLES OF 811X2 POI BLOCKS REFLECTING LOW 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT TASK PERFORMANCE (LESS THAN 30 PERCENTRESPONDING) ....... ... ........................ 77

TABLE 45 - PERCENTAGE OF TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY 811X2 MAJCOM GROUPS 78

v


PAGENUMBER

TABLE 46 - DISTRIBUTION OF 811X2A DAFSC GROUP MEMBERS ACROSSSPECIALTY JOBS ..... .. .................. . . 79

TABLE 47 - AVERAGE PERCENT TIME SPENT PERFORMING DUTIES BY 81IX2ADAFSC GROUPS ...... ....................... .. 80

TABLE 48 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 81132A/81152A PERSONNEL(N=189) ..... ... ......................... .. 82

TABLE 49 - TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN DAFSCs 81132A/81152AAND 81172A PERSONNEL (PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING) ... 83

TABLE 50 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 81172A PERSONNEL (N=64) 84TABLE 51 - TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN DAFSCs 81172A AND

81199/CEM CODE PERSONNEL (PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING) . 86TABLE 52 - RELATIVE TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT

PERSONNEL (N=117) ..... .. .................... ... 87TABLE 53 - REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT

PERSONNEL (N=117) ............................. 90TABLE 54 - NUMBER OF TIMES ARMED PHYSICAL APPREHENSION AND RESTRAINT

TECHNIQUE (PART) USED DURING LAST 12 MONTHS (OTHER THANTRAINING) BY 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL (N=117) 91

TABLE 55 - NUMBER OF TIMES UNARMED PART USED DURING LAST 12 MONTHS(OTHER THAN TRAINING) BY 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENTPERSONNEL (N=117) ....................... *....... 91

TABLE 56 - PRESENT ROLE IN ABGD FOR 811X2A FIRST-JOB AND FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL .... ................... 92

TABLE 57 - WEAPONS CARRIED OR UTILIZED BY 10 PERCENT OR MORE OF811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL (N=117) .......... ... 93

TABLE 58 - SECURITY POLICE TACTICS OR PROCEDURES USED OR PRACTICED BY10 PERCENT OR MORE OF 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL(N=117) ....... ................................. .. 94

TABLE 59 - EQUIPMENT USED OR OPERATED BY 10 PERCENT OR MORE OF 811X2AFIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL (N=117) ............ 95

TABLE 60 - TECHNICAL TASKS RATED HIGHEST IN TRAINING EMPHASIS (TE)BY 811X2A PERSONNEL .......... 96

TABLE 61 - TASKS RATED HIGHEST IN TASK DIFFICULTY (TD) BY 811X2APERSONNEL ..... ... ........................ .. 97

TABLE 62 - PERCENTAGE OF TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY 811X2A MAJCOM GROUPS. 99TABLE 63 - COMPARISON OF JOB SATISFACTION INDICATORS BY 811XO TAFMS

GROUPS (PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING)* ..... ........... 100TABLE 64 - COMPARISON OF JOB SATISFACTION INDICATORS BY 811X2 TAFMS

GROUPS (PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING)* ................. 101TABLE 65 - COMPARISON OF JOB SATISFACTION INDICATORS BY 811X2A TAFMS

GROUPS (PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING)* ..... ........... 102TABLE 66 - COMPARISON OF CURRENT SURVEY AND 1984 811X0 TAFMS GROUPS

(PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING POSITIVELY) .... ......... 104TABLE 67 - COMPARISON OF CURRENT SURVEY AND 1984 811X2 TAFMS GROUPS

(PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING POSITIVELY) .... ......... 105TABLE 68 - COMPARISON OF CURRENT SURVEY AND 1984 811X2A TAFMS GROUPS

(PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING POSITIVELY) .... ......... 106

vi


PAGENUMBER

TABLE 69 - COMPARISONS OF JOB SATISFACTION INDICATORS BY SPECIALTYJOB CLUSTERS AND INDEPENDENT JOBS (PERCENT MEMBERSRESPONDING)* ........ ...................... .. 107-109

FIGURE 1 - 811XX SPECIALTY JOBS (N=6,014) ...... ............. 9FIGURE 2 - DISTRIBUTION OF 811X0 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL ACROSS

SPECIALTY JOBS (N=1,465) ........ ................ 36FIGURE 3 - DISTRIBUTION OF 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL ACROSS

SPECIALTY JOBS ....... ..................... .... 60FIGURE 4 - DISTRIBUTION OF 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL ACROSS

SPECIALTY JOBS (N=117) ..... ................. .... 89

APPENDIX A - SELECTED REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY CAREERLADDER STRUCTURE GROUPS ....... ............... 112

vii

PREFACE

This report presents the results of a detailed Air Force OccupationalSurvey of the Security Police career field (AFSCs 811X0, 811X2, and 811X2A).Authority for conducting occupational surveys is contained in AFR 35-2.Computer products upon which this report is based are available for the use ofoperations and training officials.

The survey instrument was developed by Captain Ken TeBrink, InventoryDevelopment Specialist, with computer programming support furnished byMaster Sergeant Cornelia Wharton. Ms Tamme Lambert provided administrativesupport. Mr Robert L. Alton, Occupational Analyst, analyzed the data and wrotethe final report. This report has been reviewed and approved byLieutenant Colonel Johnny M. Collins, Chief, Airman Analysis Section, Occupa-tional Analysis Flight, USAF Occupational Measurement Squadron (USAFOMS).

Copies of this report are distributed to Air Staff sections, majorcommands, and other interested training and management personnel. Additionalcopies are available upon request to the USAF Occupational Measurement Squad-ron, Attention: Chief, Occupational Analysis Flight (OMY), Randolph AFB,Texas 78150-5000 (OSN 487-6623).

GARY R. BLUM, Lt Colonel, USAF JOSEPH S. TARTELLCommander Chief, Occupational Analysis FlightUSAF Occupational Measurement USAF Occupational MeasurementSquadron Squadron

viii

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

1. Survey Coverage: The Security Police career field was surveyed toevaluate changes in the 811XX career ladders and to obtain current task andequipment data for use in evaluating current training programs. Due to thelarge number of assigned 811XX personnel, a stratified random sample processwas used to select participants. Survey results are based on responses from6,014 respondents (80 percent of the total personnel selected for survey).All major using commands are satisfactorily represented in the survey sample.

2. Specialty Jobs: Seven clusters and fourteen independent jobs wereidentified in the career ladder structure analysis. Six clusters and elevenof the independent jobs involved the primary day-to-day technical responsi-bilities of the career ladders in the survey. The remaining cluster andindependent jobs can be generally categorized as staff or support functions.Survey data indicate personnel are performing jobs as outlined in the currentclassification structure, with some job diversity notable in the 811XO and811X2 career ladders.

3. Career Ladder Progression: Three- and 5-skill level jobs in both careerladders and the A-shred were found to be highly technical. Although 811X0 and811X2 7-skill level NCOs spend over half of their job time on nonsupervisorytasks, a shift toward supervisory functions is evident. A-shred 7-skill levelpersonnel devote the majority of their job time to supervisory and dog train-ing activities. Nine-skill level and Chief Enlisted Manager (CEM) Codepersonnel are basically managers and supervisors.

4. AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions: The descriptions for the Security PoliceSuperintendent, Law Enforcement Specialist, and Law Enforcement Supervisorwere found to be complete and accurately portray the nature of the jobs. Someadjustment is suggested for the 811X0 descriptions and the A-shred portion ofthe 81172 descriptions.

5. Training Analysis: The Specialty Training Standard (STS) for each careerladder is generally supported by survey data. Both the 811X0 and 811X2Adocuments may require some adjustments. Plans of Instruction (POI) for the811X0 and 811X2 ABR courses are generally supported by survey data, but eachcontains some criterion objectives requiring review due to low percentages offirst-term airmen performing tasks being trained. Four hours of instructionin the Patrol Dog Handler course require review.

6. Implications: Personnel in the 811XX career ladders are performing avariety of different jobs, with very little overlap between the two careerladders and A-shred personnel. Career field ABR courses are generally sup-ported by survey data, although some adjustments need to be considered. Jobinterest for 811X0 personnel is disturbingly low and requires the attention ofcareer ladder managers.

ix

OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORTSECURITY POLICE CAREER LADDERS

(AFSC 811XX)

INTRODUCTION

This is a report of an occupational survey of the Security (AFSC 811X0)and Law Enforcement (AFSCs 811X2/A) career ladders completed by the USAFOccupational Measurement Squadron. This survey was requested by HQ AFOSP (nowAF Security Police Agency - AFSPA), Kirtland AFB NM, to evaluate changes inthe career ladders and to obtain current task and equipment data for use inevaluating current training programs. The last survey results pertaining tothese career ladders were published in November 1984.

Background

As described in AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions, dated October 1991,personnel in the 811XO career ladder are responsible for guarding Air Forceweapons systems; defending Air Force installations; protecting personnel,equipment, and facilities; and performing special security, corrections, andair base ground defense functions. Personnel in the 811X2 career ladder (perAFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions dated April 1991) are responsible for main-taining law and order and protecting personnel, equipment, and facilities.Additionally, they perform special law enforcement and corrections functionsand support Security Police engaged in air base ground defense (ABGD) func-tions. Those 811X2 airmen awarded the A shred are also responsible for thetraining, care, and proper utilization of military working dogs (MWD).

Primary entry into the career ladders is from the Basic Military TrainingGroup (BMTG) through a Category A, 5-week and 3-day formal training course for811X0 personnel (3ABR81130 003) and a Category A, 5-week and 3-day formaltraining course for 811X2 airmen (3ABR81132 003/004). Additionally, personnelin the Law Enforcement specialty selected for the "A" shred (Military WorkingDog Qualified) attend a follow-on course of 6 weeks and 3 days (3ALR81132A001). Entry into the 811XX career field currently requires an Armed ServicesVocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) General score of 35. Each of the formaltraining courses discussed above is conducted at Lackland AFB, Texas.

Since this report encompasses two career ladders and a shred withdifferent responsibilities, separate specialty training standards (STSs) andseparate training courses, the report is divided into five sections. Thefirst section deals with the career ladder structure utilizing the total

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED.

sample of 811X0, 811X2, and 811X2A personnel. Sections II, III, and IVdiscuss the separate ladders and shred, including such topics as: (1) com-parison of pertinent job structure and other survey data with career ladderdocuments such as AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions, STSs, and Plans of Instruc-tion (POI); (2) analyses of Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS) andDuty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) groups; and (3) analyses of majorcommand (MAJCOM) groups. Section V discusses Job Satisfaction data forvarious groups and the implications of the survey results.

SURVEY METHODOLOGY

Inventory Development

The data collection instrument for this occupational survey was USAF JobInventory AFPT 90-811-858, dated September 1990. A tentative task list wasprepared after reviewing pertinent career ladder publications and directives,tasks from the previous survey instrument, and data from the last OccupationalSurvey Report (OSR). The preliminary task list was refined and validatedthrough personal interviews with 72 subject-matter experts (selected to covera variety of MAJCOMs and 811XX career field functions) at the followinglocations:

BASE REASON FOR VISIT

Little Rock AFB AR MAC base. MAC ABGD training andevaluation center.

Keesler AFB MS ATC base. Specialized securityclearance processing function.Operates Air Force LawEnforcement Terminal System(AFLETS) and Security PoliceAutomated System (SPAS)

Eglin AFB FL TAC/AFSC base. Multiple functionssuch as magistrate system;service as Systems SecurityEngineers (SSE) for testingpurposes; and mobilitycommitment.

Clark AB RP PACAF base. Multiple functionssuch as overseas ABGD trainingand "real time" mission; largeMWD activity; anti terrorismsection; and town patroloperations.

2

Davis-Monthan AFB AZ TAC base. Specialized securityrequirements and mobilitycommitments.

Kunsan AB ROK PACAF base. Unique securityoperations due to remote locationand shared responsibilities withROK. Varied weapons usage.

Lowry AFB CO ATC base. Special confinement andcorrections activities.

Ellsworth AFB SD SAC base. Missile securityoperations. Northern tier base.

Lackland AFB TX Location of ABR/ALR technicaltraining courses.

The resulting job inventory contained a comprehensive listing of 886tasks grouped under 18 duty headings and a background section requesting suchinformation as grade, duty title, types of weapons carried or used, securitypolice tactics or procedures used, and types of equipment used or operated.

Survey Administration

From October 1990 through March 1991, Military Personnel Flights (MPF) inoperational units worldwide administered the inventory to job incumbentsholding DAFSC 811XX. Job incumbents were selected from a computer-generatedmailing list obtained from personnel data tapes maintained by the ArmstrongLaboratory/Human Resources Directorate (AL/HRD).

Each individual who completed the inventory first completed anidentification and biographical information section and then checked each taskperformed in his or her current job. After checking all tasks performed, eachmember then rated each of these tasks on a 9-point scale, showing relativetime spent on that task, as compared to all other tasks checked. The ratingsranged from 1 (very small amount time spent) through 5 (about average timespent) to 9 (very large amount spent).

To determine relative time spent for each task checked by a respondent,all of the incumbent's ratings are assumed to account for 100 percent of hisor her time spent on the job and are summed. Each task rating is then dividedby the total task ratings and multiplied by 100 to provide a relative percent-age of time for each task. This procedure provides a basis for comparingtasks in terms of both percent members performing and average percent timespent.

3

Survey Sample

Personnel were selected to participate in this survey so as to ensure anaccurate representation across MAJCOMs and military paygrade groups. Due tothe large number of assigned 811XX personnel, a stratified random samplingprocess was used to select survey participants. Approximately 20 percent ofthe assigned population were selected to participate in the survey. Table 1reflects the percentage distribution, by MAJCOM, of assigned personnel in thecareer ladders as of September 1990. The 6,014 respondents in the finalsample represent 80 percent of the total personnel surveyed. Table 2 reflectsthe paygrade distribution for these 811XX personnel. As reflected in thesetables, the survey sample is a very good representation of the career fieldpopulation.

Task Factor Administration

While most participants in the survey process completed a USAF JobInventory, selected senior 811XX personnel were asked to complete bookletsrendering judgements on task training emphasis (TE) or task difficulty (TD).The TE and TO booklets were processed separately from the job inventories.The information gained from these task factor data is used in various analysesand is a valuable part of the training decision process.

Task Difficulty (TD). Each individual completing a TD booklet was asked torate all of the tasks on a 9-point scale (from extremely low to extremelyhigh) as to the relative difficulty of each task in the inventory. Difficultyis defined as the length of time required by the average incumbent to learn todo the task. Task difficulty data were independently collected from 7-skilllevel or 9-skill level personnel stationed worldwide (73 AFSC 811X0 raters, 73AFSC 811X2 raters, and 45 AFSC 811X2A raters). Interrater reliability wasdetermined to be adequate for each AFSC, which reflects a satisfactory agree-ment among raters. Ratings were standardized so tasks have an average diffi-culty of 5.00, with a standard deviation of 1.00. The resulting data yieldessentially a rank ordering of tasks indicating the degree of difficulty foreach task in the inventory.

Training Emphasis (TE). Individuals completing TE booklets were asked to ratetasks on a 10-point scale (from no training required to extremely high amountof training required). Training emphasis is a rating of which tasks requirestructured training for first-term personnel. Structured training is definedas training provided by resident technical schools, field training detachments(FTD), mobile training teams (MTT), formal OJT, or any other organized train-ing method. Training emphasis data were independently collected from 7-skilllevel or 9-skill level personnel stationed worldwide (74 AFSC 811XO raters, 85AFSC 811X2 raters, and 41 AFSC 811X2A raters). The interrater reliability forthese raters was adequate, indicating there was satisfactory agreement amongraters for each AFSC as to which tasks required some form of structuredtraining and which did not. In the 811XO career ladder, tasks have an averageTE rating of 1.83; tasks considered high in training emphasis have ratings of3.50 or above. In the 811X2 career ladder, tasks have an average TE rating of

4

LU i m (V- ~4 y4 4

40 ciO .0.

01 Ll-

-4 0L

00 CDC- ZZ .~--4 -W-1 ~40 4A(j P- I~ 4--

U- tn

U.J .J .-.4 eJ e'J II-, If -d Inr- 0

<LLJ < a,N\ C.), A

00 0 < r qw m ' r-l. CV0 <~ (A 0 LO -4 00

I-W LL) ~CJCa. ui CD 04 -I -4CD

>C rJ C40v14 0 .40.

-4

coLL CV)J CA Go 00tC

o) - q-t C O

ZW LJ L) Nc f0 0 ( o 10oc afll C 0 00 -CJ4oi :z uj -- 44 1 -4-4"-4 0lV- 41'

coO V"C nC) nn.C

Go 0- V" -- MW)0 00 (V.(U .0f

0-4Con m

C)0L Lf014I~-Lf' 0) 0'-4 In=Z 1nCN10C -11L)4 01 0LfO CDc 0

Lii CD .4 .4 4 I I - - - a, o Im

cc IV) CV) -4w Gf) I r= a) 1

CDI .0LiLL .06C @1 2

oE *- 0)a

:zLLJ 00 OD kD co -40CJDI 0~ 0C 0 a, u a,W...J-0 ~C%J l 0A Inc x CA

L C. 0 4) s- 0

Cp l C C L C L @ 1 I nE/u' R LL . 0.

V0 .0C 4 c 36 In

Q :P~-I 0' C AV vi

ZZ~~~~0 :0o44CJc 0%A -C-

WLJ(D -- J 0 go o d - 00 0 im

OldiA % P Sn-. go m 0W06 "0 4 A 6- Wa ' m

C~L. 0 0 C I-.

< C 4jco1 41Ca-ff'-4 C t

LA 1 -JM t un~ -M -. .0 ti

CUUWWVJL) )-iX 4 41 41 1-- 4 4' &- ) I--ci 1U« L .- 0000 wO@ 0) c

5 - L 0 X

LL

X LI I S I 0D p-, Or) 0CD .J C\I bflL~

0

J-LLJ

=O~ I I m Cl to~

MU. CC3

LL.

LU

-j I

= i CA C C..j r- ., I ILU (m % ci I'd

C~ 0 0

w U L J a n CC .J fn C Jj 9O

)PIC 93L V) V ~ y-

ILi

C3 J Lj C w vc -4 -4C

a-a.

0 0 4LkU "i .4i CV J 0 ' I

o D LUC V) () %

LA-I

LU C mfl c

LLI cnCOL.

>-. I w m n % r. o 00L a, , , Ui W

1.98; tasks considered high in training emphasis have ratings of 3.64 orabove. For the "A" shred, tasks have an average TE rating of 1.95; tasksconsidered high in training emphasis have ratings of 3.72 or above. As wasdiscussed in the Task Difficulty (TD) section above, TE rating data may alsobe used to rank order tasks indicating those tasks which senior NCOs in thevarious career ladders consider the most important for the first-term airmanto know.

When used in conjunction with the primary criterion of percent membersperforming, TD and TE ratings can provide insight into first-term personneltraining requirements. Such insights may suggest a need for lengthening orshortening portions of instruction supporting AFS entry-level jobs.

SECTION I

SPECIALTY JOBS(Career Ladder Structure)

A USAF Occupational Analysis begins with an examination of the careerladder structure. The structure of jobs within the Security Police careerladders was examined on the basis of similarity of tasks performed and thepercent of time spent ratings provided by job incumbents, independent of otherspecialty background factors.

Each individual in the sample performs a set of tasks called a job.Individual jobs are organized into similar units of work by an automated jobclustering program. This hierarchical grouping program is a basic part of theComprehensive Occupational Data Analysis Program (CODAP) system for jobanalysis. Each individual job description (all the tasks performed by thatindividual and the relative amount of time spent on those tasks) in the sampleis compared to every other job description in terms of tasks performed and therelative amount of time spent on each task in the job inventory. The auto-mated system is designed to locate the two job descriptions with the mostsimilar tasks and percent time ratings and combine them to form a compositejob description. In successive stages, new members are added to initialgroups, or new groups are formed based on the similarity of tasks performedand similar time ratings in the individual job descriptions.

The basic identifying group used in the hierarchical job structuringprocess is the Job. When there is a substantial degree of similarity betweenJobs, they are grouped together and identified as a Cluster. Specialized Jobstoo dissimilar to fit within a Cluster are labeled Independent Jobs (IJ). Thejob structure information resulting from this grouping process (the variousjobs within the career ladder) can be used to evaluate the accuracy of careerladder documents (AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions and STSs) and to gain abetter understanding of current utilization patterns. The above terminology.will be used in the discussion of the 811XX career ladder structure.

7

Overview of Specialty Jobs

Structure analysis identified 7 clusters and 14 independent jobs withinthe survey sample. Based on task similarity and relative time spent, thedivision of jobs performed by 811XX personnel is illustrated in Figure 1, anda listing of those clusters and independent jobs is provided below. The stage(ST) number shown beside each title is a reference to computer-printed infor-mation; the number of personnel in each group (N) is also shown.

I. INSTALLATION ENTRY CONTROL CLUSTER (ST0300, N=218)

II. INSTALLATION PATROL CLUSTER (ST0346, N=1,029)

III. INVESTIGATIONS (IJ) (ST0335, N=90)

IV. CONFINEMENT AND CORRECTIONS (IJ) (ST0799, N=59)

V. CUSTOMS (IJ) (ST0328, N=30)

VI. MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) HANDLING CLUSTER (ST0228, N=178)

VII. MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) TRAINING (IJ) (ST1456, N=22)

VIII. AIRCRAFT AND WEAPONS STORAGE SECURITY CLUSTER (ST0188,N=1,497)

IX. MISSILE SECURITY CLUSTER (ST0137, N=498)

X. KEYS AND CODES CONTROL (IJ) (ST0796, N=12)

XI. AIR BASE GROUND DEFENSE (ABGD) CLUSTER (ST0171, N=617)

XII. EMERGENCY SERVICE TEAM (EST) (IJ) (ST0293, N=15)

XIII. ARMORY (IJ) (ST0096, N=202)

XIV. MANAGEMENT AND STAFF CLUSTER (ST0177, N=248)

XV. QUALITY CONTROL (IJ) (ST0654, N=69)

XVI. UNIT TRAINING (IJ) (ST0512, N=69)

XVII. VEHICLE CONTROL (IJ) (ST0190, N=17)

XVIII. CRIME PREVENTION AND RESOURCE PROTECTION (IJ) (ST0627,N=52)

XIX. INFORMATION, PERSONNEL, AND INDUSTRIAL SECURITY (IJ)(ST0385, N=82)

XX. REPORTS AND ANALYSIS (IJ) (ST0363, N=37)

8

N 2N3-2

00

ZN 0 II-cN

0Z 0'

~~ 0 u

U

0

~~I)0 UwJ

4 0

CL.-

coI Z w

-J[ U.

al.-

30) No 4930 tU

ow s. (Ccccs-J.-zr

I-u 3toO CcU, .0 o .LU 4

th 0400 Z - zlu lu t

mi 4~9 e

XXI. PASS AND REGISTRATION (IJ) (ST0179, N=81)

The respondents forming these groups account for 85 percent of the surveysample. The remaining 15 percent were performing tasks or series of taskswhich did not group with any of the defined jobs. Job titles given byrespondents which were representative of these personnel include Unit EPR/OPRMonitor, Property Custodian, Stinger Gunner, Mounted Horse Patrolman, Dormi-tory Manager, and Unit PRP Monitor.

Group Descriptions

The following paragraphs contain brief descriptions of the clusters andindependent jobs identified through the career ladder structure analysis.Selected background data for these groups are provided in Table 3. Represen-tative tasks for all the groups are contained in Appendix A.

I. INSTALLATION ENTRY CONTROL CLUSTER (ST0300). The 218 airmen formingthis group (4 percent of the survey sample) are responsible for authorizingvehicles onto the installation, authenticating requests for visitor entry andissuing visitor passes, enforcing the traffic code, and, when necessary,searching and inspecting personnel and vehicles. Performing a highly tcch-nical job (98 percent of their relative job time), tasks typical of theaverage 48 tasks performed are:

issuing visitor passesdirecting trafficopening or closing installation primary entry control

pointsproviding directions or information to visitorsissuing traffic tickets or violation notices

Of the two job variations within this cluster, one group wasdistinguished by the performance of a combination of entry control and instal-lation patrol tasks. Comprised primarily of 811X2 personnel (79 percent), 89percent are still in their first enlistment and report an average of only 32months time in the service.

II. INSTALLATION PATROL CLUSTER (ST0346). Representing 17 percent of thesurvey sample (the second largest group identified), these 1,029 predominantly811X2 airmen (85 percent) perform a series of tasks that cover a variety oflaw enforcement functions. Examples of patrol duties include responding toincidents and complaints; conducting initial investigations of incidents,complaints, and traffic accidents; preparing reports; enforcing the installa-tion traffic code; and conducting building checks. Of the average 109 tasksperformed, tasks reflecting the above responsibilities include:

10

0 a a0 N00 0inP

II

4A

to-

aI X

inK KP.a0 aA.4 @~ *N r P

ift C4onUl

utu

a at

MA.

04.

r. tv M4 Nw -0 l0 04 l

.4 44

I- p444

P4 0

a IIqYi D4 49 4P bI D 0o o4

N I

to 10

01 tow

zzz~ O0N to

444p

00 *@ Nim~i ~z

24wt

w P404 4 0 pqV4 q p 04p11

CY F4 N .a .46

m An@

61 to on .4-. 0 K 44 00 %In In 0UU

aX' NN X X X.1 Z N XA NvX

a rW r* 0 D. 4m4 Cf-N CIsaj -9I Au P4

mui ~.1

tym 0 0 a 04 n1 a 0 on

ada

a ," l -4 'aumK a"tpu E

ma M- mlu G3Iii I

in4 1* 0 4W t 0I n N N -I-I

112

ty N

as o

-- us4 14 *@Cmu

u

muu

& ..- q P4 m Q 6 o o eey X6 d XU~~~~r 4 4 MpqI du

X XN N pq~~~60 d N 00 l y o v.

D 44 'r0dytUY q

it-m

41040

a Sw

vd v4q Fq64 ovq

45v ee q 4 p 4 v

a- 13

testing or operating speed measuring devicesresponding to duress or alarm activationsconducting building security checksinterviewing witnesses or complainantsperforming on-base mobile patrolshandcuffing subjects

Of the five job variations within this cluster, one group (30 airmen) wasnotable in that members performed both off-base foot patrols and off-basemobile patrols (Town Patrolmen). Another group was differentiated by theperformance of tasks pertaining to Air Base Ground Defense (ABGD) operations.Jobs as Desk Sergeants, Law Enforcement Supervisors, and Flight Chiefs/Sergeants were also identified based on differing combinations of technicaland supervisory tasks and the time spent on those tasks.

III. INVESTIGATIONS (ST0335). The 90 experienced members comprising thisgroup (an average of over 9 years in the career field) are responsible forconducting follow-on investigations of incidents or complaints, gathering andhandling evidence, and interrogation of suspects, witnesses, or complainants.Tasks representative of this unique function include:

initiating or completing AF Forms 1364 (Consent forSearch and Seizure)

taking latent fingerprintsmarking or seizing evidencecompiling reports of investigation packagesphotographing incident or crime scenesdetermining chains of custody

With predominant grades of E-5 and E-6, 54 percent of this group reportholding DAFSC 81172, and 41 percent report 81152 DAFSCs.

IV. CONFINEMENT AND CORRECTIONS (ST07g9). While this group of 59 airmenis dominated by 811X2 personnel (83 percent), they perform a job that isdistinctly different from the rest of the Law Enforcement sample population.Seventy-one percent of their relative job time is spent performing taskspertaining to the confinement and corrections program and the supportingadministrative forms and documentation tasks. Examples of the highly special-ized tasks performed by these incumbents include:

conducting prisoner roll calls or head countssupervising prisoner visiting periodsbriefing prisoners on facility rules and regulationsevaluating or recommending prisoner custody levelscompleting prisoner release ordersinitiating or completing DD Forms 497 (Confinement Order)

14

V. CUSTOMS (ST0328). As was the case with the preceding group, these 30airmen also perform a rather unique function. These predominantly 811X2personnel (71 percent) devote 47 percent of their relative job time to taskspertaining to customs activities and the preparation of associated forms andreports. Most (90 percent) report overseas assignments, and group membersaverage 7 years time in the career field. Tasks which clearly define the jobperformed by these personnel include clearing personnel through customs,maintaining customs declarations files, verifying cargo manifests againstcargo, confiscating contraband, and reviewing customs declarations.

VI. MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWO) HANDLING CLUSTER (ST0228). Comprisedpredominantly of 811X2A personnel (99 percent), these airmen are responsiblefor the same range of law enforcement functions as the other groups previouslydiscussed and are similar in many respects. The major difference between thegroups is that A-shred airmen perform their duties with the aid of militaryworking dogs. Representing 3 percent of the total survey sample, the 178airmen in this group spend 37 percent of their relative job time on generallaw enforcement and administrative duties and tasks; but the largest amount oftheir duty time is committed to tasks relating to the MWD program. Taskswhich display the two major facets of their job include:

feeding, watering, exercising, and grooming dogsresponding to duress or alarm activationspatrolling posts in vehicles with MWDsperforming traffic stopsmaintaining MWD kennels or kennel areasinterviewing witnesses or complainants

Although two job variations were found in the cluster, the primarydistinction between them was the greater amount of supervisory activityreflected for one of the groups.

VII. MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) TRAINING (ST1456). Training militaryworking dogs is the primary function of these 22 airmen. Twenty of therespondents report assignment to the Department of Defense Military WorkingDog Agency (DODMWDA) at Lackland AFB, Texas. Performing a very limited job(15 tasks account for over 50 percent of their relative job time), 91 percentof their relative duty time is spent performing tasks pertaining to the MWDprogram and the associated administrative forms and reports. Typical tasksperformed include:

conducting MWD care and handling initial trainingmaintaining MWD training and utilization records

or chartsidentifying MWD behavior changes

15

conducting MWD team drug detection initial trainingconducting protocol training for detector MWDsinitiating or completing AFMTC Forms 375 (MilitaryWorking Dog Status Report)

The least experienced of any group identified in the career ladderstructure (an average of only 22 months in the career field), 77 percentreport holding an E-3 paygrade, and 91 percent are still in their firstenlistment.

VIII. AIRCRAFT AND WEAPONS STORAGE SECURITY CLUSTER (ST0188). Comprised of6 different job variations and representing the largest group in the careerladder structure (1,497 and 25 percent of the total sample), these respondentsare 811X0 career ladder personnel who spend 57 percent of their relative jobtime on tasks and duties pertaining to base, weapons storage, or aircraftsystems security and general security functions. An additional 13 percent oftheir time is spent on tasks involving individual weapons maintenance. Taskswhich reflect the nature of the job performed by cluster personnel include:

responding to duress or alarm activationsconducting suspect wall searchesperforming tactical deployment from non-hardened or

standard vehiclesassembling or disassembling GAU-5A or M-16 riflesresponding to priority resource security situations,

such as helping hand and covered wagonbriefing post reliefs

The six job variations forming this cluster cover a variety ofactivities, ranging from a sentry standing watch at an assigned post topersonnel operating Master Surveillance Control Facilities. Some jobs wereformed by personnel performing functions, such as serving on response forceteams or working in central security control (CSC). With an average of over 6years time in the career field, 84 percent of the group members report posses-sion of a 5- or 7-skill level DAFSC (61 percent and 23 percent, respectively).

IX. MISSILE SECURITY CLUSTER (ST0137). Tasks performed in support ofsecurity for missile sites and convoy operations distinguish this cluster of498 811X0 SAC airmen (8 percent of the survey sample) from the group ofsecurity personnel discussed previously. Devoting 76 percent of their rela-tive job time to tasks and duties pertaining to general security functions,strategic missile systems security, and individual weapons maintenance, thesepredominantly 5-skill level airmen (71 percent) are involved in controllingentry to launch control facilities (LCF), responding to alarms, and escortingother personnel (such as maintenance workers), as required. Of the average 50tasks performed, typical ones include:

16

maintaining missile site topside securityentering A-circuit combination changesresponding to duress or alarm activationsauthenticating identity when entering missile

launch facilitiesconducting metal detection searches of missile

facility visitors

Although five job variations were identified, the majority of theseairmen performed duty as LCF Alarm Response Team personnel. The most notablevariation from the core group was formed by personnel who identified them-selves as Flight Security Controllers and responded to tasks pertaining tobriefing and dispatching security response forces.

X. KEYS AND CODES CONTROL (ST0796). Also a part of missile securityoperations, this small group of 12 experienced SAC personnel (an average ofover 8 years' time in the career field and an average grade of E-5) is respon-sible for the control and issue of keys and code materials required for accessto missile launch facilities. The job performed by these 811XO personnel isvery specialized and limited in scope (only 21 tasks account for over 50percent of their relative job time). Typical of the specialized tasks per-formed are:

issuing missile facility entry keysmaintaining entry authority or entry authorization

lists (EAL) accountability recordsissuing missile facility entry codesmaintaining missile facitity entry control classified

code materialsdirecting keys and codes control center operations

XI. AIR BASE GROUND DEFENSE (ABGD) CLUSTER (ST0171). Although themajority of these 617 airmen reported assignments to functions such as Air-craft Security Operations, Weapons Storage Site Security, Industrial Security,and Training, they are drawn together as a group because of their partici-pation in ABGD operations. Comprised primarily of 811XO personnel (91 per-cent) and representing 10 percent of the total survey sample, 91 percent ofthe respondents indicated specific assignment to an ABGD designated position(e.g., Fire Team Member or Leader, Squad Leader, Heavy Weapons Gun Crew) andthe largest segment of their relative job time (37 percent) was committed totasks and duties pertaining to actual or simulated ABGD operations. Perform-ing the highest average number of tasks of any group identified in the careerladder structure analysis (126), typical ABGD tasks include:

employing field telephone systemsconstructing individual fighting positionsdeploying during vehicle-mounted ABGD operationsconducting combat searchesemploying land navigation techniques

17

Although there are three job variations identified in the cluster, allthree were dominated by a core of common technical ABGD tasks. Variationsamong the groups were based on the amount of relative job time spent onsupervisory and training tasks.

XII. EMERGENCY SERVICE TEAM (EST) (ST0293). Responsible for assisting inconfrontation management situations, these teams are used in special opera-tions that could include dealing with hostage-takers, snipers, or regainingcontrol of strategic locations such as armories. Most of the 15 airmenserving as EST members report holding 811X0 DAFSCs (93 percent), and the groupaverages over 7 and 1/2 years time in the career field. Examples of charac-teristic tasks common to the group are:

conducting tactical building approaches orforce positioning

writing EST operations ordersselecting marksman overwatch positionsplotting EST inner or outer perimeter positionsadvising on-scene commanders on EST capabilities

and limitations

XIII. ARMORY (ST0096). Although the primary responsibility for armorypersonnel is to control and account for weapons, responsibility for ammunitionand other equipment stored in the armory is a part of the job as well. Thisgroup was differentiated by the high number of tasks performed in support ofthe above responsibilities. Representing 3 percent of the survey sample (202members), the vast majority of the group are 811XO personnel, with only 12percent reporting 811X2 DAFSCs. Tasks which typify armory operations include:

inventorying ammunition, weapons, or equipmentissuing weapons or equipment to security policeor combat crew personnel

recharging portable communications equipmentbatteries

securing weapons storage facilitiesissuing privately owned weapons

Performing an average of 48 tasks, 64 percent of this group's relativejob time is encompassed in performing individual weapons maintenance or armorytasks and handling the associated administrative tasks.

XIV. MANAGEMENT AND STAFF CLUSTER (ST0177). This cluster of 248 personnelrepresents 4 percent of the survey sample. Thirty-one percent of the grouphold the 9-skill level or CEM Code, and 55 percent are performing at the7-skill level DAFSC (34 percent 81170, 20 percent 81172, and 1 percent81172A). Eighty-two percent of their relative duty time is devoted to super-

18

vision, management, training, and administrative functions. Averaging over 15years in the career field (highest experience factor of all the groups identi-fied), 75 percent of the respondents report supervisory responsibilities.Representative supervisory and managerial-type tasks performed by the groupinclude:

developing or improving work methods or procedureswriting EPRsdrafting organizational policies, operating

instructions (01), and standard operating procedures (SOP)scheduling leaves or passesanalyzing or reviewing inspection reports

Within this cluster were three job variations, with two groups performingthe general managerial and supply functions, while the third group performed ajob oriented toward the planning and programming function.

XV. QUALITY CONTROL (ST0654). The 69 senior personnel (71 percent report7-skill level DAFSCs and an average of 12 years time in the career field)forming this group perform a job that is characterized by the time spentperforming tasks dealing with the evaluation, inspection, or review of varioussecurity or law enforcement operations or programs. Typical tasks include:

developing inspection programsevaluating pass and registration programsreviewing inspection reportsevaluating compliance with work standardsdeveloping quality control or standardization

programs

XVI. UNIT TRAINING (ST0512). Representing I percent of the survey sample,these 69 NCOs (65 percent 811XO and 35 percent 811X2 personnel) spend themajority of their relative job time on tasks pertaining to training (37percent), planning and organizing (14 percent), and administrative functions(15 percent). Examples of tasks defining this group include:

administering testsplanning or conducting general military training (GMT)

or ancillary trainingestablishing or maintaining study reference filesconducting special individualized trainingconducting security police augmentee training

19

The majority of the group report E-5 or E-6 paygrades (43 percent and 32percent, respectively) and reflect an average of over 11 years experience inthe career field.

XVII. VEHICLE CONTROL (ST0190). Coordinating vehicle maintenance orrepairs with the base transportation function, monitoring vehicle utilization,and assuring that vehicles are, and remain, properly equipped, are some of theprimary responsibilities of the 17 members forming this group. These predomi-nantly E-5 and E-6 personnel (all report 811X0 DAFSCs) spend very little timeon security-oriented tasks. Examples of tasks which display the nature ofthis rather unique job include:

performing security police vehicle intermediate ormotor pool maintenance

initiating or completing AF Forms 171 (Request forDriver's Training and Addition to US Govt MotorVeh Opr Permit)

evaluating government vehicle operator qualificationsinitiating or completing AF Forms 1800 (Operator's

Inspect Guide and Trouble Report (General PurposeVehicle))

performing security police vehicle preventative maintenance

XVIII. CRIME PREVENTION AND RESOURCE PROTECTION (ST0627). Comprisedprimarily of 811X2 personnel (77 percent), these relatively senior personnel(44 percent report E-5 and 25 percent report E-6 paygrades, with an average ofover 8 years in the career field) are responsible for the crime prevention andresources protection programs at their installations. Typical tasks performedinclude:

conducting antirobbery or drug awareness trainingconducting crime prevention surveysanalyzing criminal statistical datadeveloping resource protection planswriting funds or weapons inspection reports

The job performed by these 52 respondents is also identified by theirinvolvement in police youth programs and crime prevention projects, such asOperation Crime Stop, Citizens Awareness Program, and Neighborhood Watch.

XIX. INFORMATION, PERSONNEL, AND INDUSTRIAL SECURITY (ST0385). This groupof 82 respondents (over 1 percent of the survey sample) is formed by moresenior personnel, with 69 percent holding a 7-skill level DAFSC (45 percent81170 and 24 percent 81172), and 9 percent reporting performing at the 9-skilllevel DAFSC. This group differs from others previously discussed due to theirconcentration on activities pertaining to security education programs, storage

20

of classified materials, handling security violation reports, security classi-fication management, security clearance processing, and industrial securitymatters involving Air Force contractors. Representative of the average 67tasks performed are tasks such as:

conducting industrial or physical security inspectionsconducting information security program annual reviewsevaluating administrative control of classified materialsinitiating or completing DD Forms 398 (Personnel SecurityQuestionnaire (BI/SBI))

maintaining special security filesevaluating information or personnel security programs

XX. REPORTS AND ANALYSIS (ST0363). Reviewing administrativecorrespondence or reports; initiating or completing AF Forms 83 (USAF LawEnforcement Report); conducting security police record checks; and maintainingdisciplinary action files, such as revocations, barred persons, or suspendeddrivers files, are typical tasks for which this small group of 37 respondentsis responsible. The job performed is fairly limited in scope, with only 18tasks accounting for over 50 percent of their relative job time. Averagingover 8 years in the career field, most (65 percent) of the group membersreport an 811X2 DAFSC.

XXI. PASS AND REGISTRATION (ST0179). The group formed by these 81 membersis about equally balanced between 811XO and 811X2 personnel (48 percent and 50percent respectively). The job performed by the incumbents is administrativein nature and deals with the responsibilities of operating the pass andregistration functions at Air Force activities. Tasks which characterize thejob performed by the group include:

issuing identification cards or badgesfingerprinting personnel or prisonersissuing vehicle decalsupdating or accessing SPAS dataphotographing personnel for identificationcredentials

The majority of these group members report holding a 5-skill level DAFSCand average well over 7 years in the career field.

Comparisons of Specialty Jobs

Seven clusters and fourteen independent jobs were identified in thecareer ladder structure analysis. Six clusters and eleven of the independentjobs were involved in the performance of the various primary day-to-daytechnical responsibilities of the career ladders involved. The remaining

21

cluster and independent jobs can be generally categorized as staff and supportpersonnel (i.e., MANAGEMENT AND STAFF, UNIT TRAINING, QUALITY CONTROL, andVEHICLE CONTROL). The large number of clusters, independent jobs, and pre-viously mentioned job variations within the clusters, indicates some degree ofdiversity in the career field, particularly within the 811XO and 811X2 careerladders. This diversity can have some impact on training within the careerfield.

The six clusters representing the technical jobs were clearly AFSCspecific. The same holds true for nine of the independent jobs. The remain-ing cluster and five independent jobs contained varying degrees of combina-tions of the ladders surveyed. This combination pattern is affected by thevariations in the dominant manning patterns (811XO versus 811X2) at basesacross the Air Force. These manning patterns are generally dictated by eachbase's primary mission.

Since the jobs with combinations of AFSCs account for only 10 percent ofthe survey sample, it is evident that most sample respondents are working injobs limited to specific AFSCs. Consequently, even though there are somegeneral police tasks performed in common across the career ladders (e.g.,apprehend subjects; handcuff subjects; or respond to duress or alarm activa-tions), there is very little overlap of duties and functions between 811XO and811X2 career ladder personnel. Individuals holding DAFSC 811X2A, as expected,are performing many tasks in common with 811X2 airmen. Overall, the differ-ences between the two career ladders and the A-shred are evident, and surveydata indicate personnel are performing jobs as defined in the current classi-fication structure.

Comparison of Current Group Descriptions to Previous SurveyFindings

The results of the specialty job analysis were compared to those ofOccupational Survey Report (OSR) AFPT 90-811-531, SECURITY POLICE CAREERLADDERS, dated November 1984. After reviewing the tasks comprising the jobsidentified in 1984, all of the groups with substantial numbers of personnelcould be linked to similar task performances by 1992 sample groups (see Table4). Even though some comparable groups from 1992 to 1984 reflect differentpercentages of the sample, this variation could generally be attributed tomodifications in the task list or to the analysis approach used.

There was one job identified in the current sample (VEHICLE CONTROL)which did not have a direct match in the 1984 career ladder structure; and onejob described in 1984 (KENNEL SUPPORT SPECIALISTS) was not identified in thecurrent sample. Both groups involve very few personnel and have little impacton the career field as a whole in terms of numbers.

Aside from the above-mentioned variations, the vast majority of thecurrent sample were found to be performing jobs identified in 1984, thusdisplaying a career field which has remained relatively stable over time.

22

7 r~-~--r -- '-

LU LU LLU LI

C)CA.

0:. oUJ to L-A0 03 I- LU LU J=

46 LUJ m ?- W ) V) LUJ>_ 0 C-) 6 -4 X -j LUJ

LAJ -4 li j c W) 0 .. J cn0o Il- m. <C LA U- n 0 m

CC an CD 0 LU e cc LUCLcc U 0 w. - - LUJ I- U.

CV) LUJ C3 w LUI P-. C C LU0.-0) LI LUJ 9. P-4LU L) 0 CD

m 0 =- CD- n ) >- L.)Zo 1 'C 1- 0= n-4 en C3

LUJ 0 be -i cc C _jLr LU JM >- D LU 4r. C- 0 0 (1 "J C 3 0

Z )L C-) .J u w0 . 'CJU LU L C) CD _j:C c9 I- 0) LUJ LU (n LUz 0 AC s'>_ >_~ m V) I _ - 0 LU~ M )

LL 0 1--D cc c U.Z) LUI CA = I=(- C) AC CO _ <3 'C) _j <J .4 CO LU

UA ..J .U ZL w cc ) 0" co ) czI.- cz w- cc~ = c^-) 4-)

cc "- 0c _j- s-C LU s-C LU V-a LU Cc C.Li L C.) 926 'C b n116 W 'CL C

LUu.4

z

0L

'C L L

CL.

_-

LU I.- .. j

0. cn I. co

I- w- wUC

0t)_ 0 0 . 2 LUcc ): u- CL CC LU LUC

OL) LU wn CL0D 6 1-- -J Q-I

>_ WMV 0 31 4A 0 I V)) 2 Lzip - wD cz 0.j c

00- 0 = u VA-- u- 0 tI-LU.-- 2c .31 ?a "0 w w- ZD

Z U >_ g U Lz >0 w0>.I-- I . 0 0 c

to4 ce w' WU W.. LLo- (_j _j 1c I.- < Q < >-w -) - _w 4c< 4n f) -~ t^ 0Z. I--C. 0 t-m n cc4

I- I-. - 4-). 1-- 0- LU Li.4 LUcam V 2 &-= = = a "-W 0 - V)LX V" 'C C-4 w

022 0-8- (1 L 4C. .1c 0 -'in <. U'

23

I-- CL..

Lu~~ ac OD) ic C~

0 L LI

O~~g LLOW > U-L LUU< 4 U

O z (A -2 0L %A LU I ix. . CL

O 4 0 LU L L2 CA 0 L2y LU X- 0.100 -4

2t C3- C.9 LU L0 4nV) LU CU) 2L to~) -<

LU6 2 < LL. I J X~ L W 0. UC.JJ 0L P" .a 20 cc2l C-3 LU LU C-< ~

2e LU C =CX LuU L ia

LU

LU<

-i

C-)

LUO

LLLU

I-L

-I L

CD LULL. 1= 2c - (A 0 &DLL = 1-- 0- .4u

CA cc~ )- OC &ix = -.1 Ci 06

2r ~ - 0A M LU C-) < U Io 0 0 ip 0L 2C 31!Li Li L -4 P" P- -4

<A I-- I. cc2 CD

25 0 -4 w LZ ce NAU_- 0 - -0 00 %n Go~oc C- 0-4 XC P" L Z 4I.. CL V .

uj = CLU 0 Z LU 4C0' zi L C) 0.

24

SECTION II

ANALYSIS OF 811XO DAFSC GROUPS

An analysis of DAFSC groups, in conjunction with the analysis of thecareer ladder structure, is an important part of each occupational survey.The DAFSC analysis identifies differences in tasks performed at the variousskill levels. This information may then be used to evaluate how well careerladder documents, such as AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions and the STS, reflectwhat career ladder personnel are actually doing in the field.

A comparison of the duty and task performance between DAFSCs 81130 and81150 indicated that, while there are some minor differences, by and large,the jobs they perform are essentially the same. Therefore, they will bediscussed as a combined group in this report. Similarly, DAFSC 81199 and CEMCode 81100 groups have been combined for reporting purposes.

The distribution of skill level groups across the career ladder jobs isdisplayed in Table 5, while Table 6 offers another perspective by displayingthe relative percent time spent on each duty across the skill level groups. Atypical pattern of progression is present, with personnel spending more oftheir relative time on duties involving supervisory, managerial, and trainingtasks as they move upward toward the 7-skill level, the 9-skill level, or theCEM Code. It is also obvious, though, that 7-skill level personnel are stillvery involved with technical task performance, as will be pointed out in thespecific skill level group discussions below.

Skill Level Descriptions

DAFSCs 81130/81150. The 2,887 airmen in the 3- and 5-skill level group(representing 48 percent of the survey sample) performed an average of only 53tasks. Performing a highly technical job, 60 percent of their relative dutytime is devoted to tasks involving general security functions; base, weaponsstorage, aircraft, or missile systems security; or ABGD operations. Taskspertaining to individual weapons maintenance and administrative functionsaccounted for an additional 24 percent of their duty time. Table 7 displaysselected representative time-consuming tasks performed by the highest percent-ages of these airmen. Table 8 displays those tasks which more clearly differ-entiate the 3-/5-skill level and 7-skill level groups. A review of all thetasks performed by group members revealed that only eight tasks are performedby 50 percent or more of the group. This low number of common tasks performedby these airmen suggests a diverse career ladder. This diversity is alsoevident when you review the group's dispersion across the specialty jobsidentified (see Table 5).

DAFSC 81170. Seven-skill level personnel, representing 17 percent of thesurvey sample, perform an average of 72 tasks. Even though 76 percent reportsupervisory responsibilities, only 38 percent of their job time is spent ontasks in the usual supervisory, managerial, and training duties (see Table 6).

25

ONL I- D( DC DCD( DaC DC DW mC 0( DV4W rZ3c ~

V-4 04 H4co~ C-)O O O OO O~lO O%~4- I

40v xU

VL) LU o

"C co CDC DC%( )C DCDC >C D .J)C C Dr

C-) CD -l

LL V-4

<~I "

c 000%~t~CV) 0WG d - DC)M mc

LUJda.V) I-

0D LUJ al ea 4 at ae *on L).) -4 rit4 c oa "W 41 -i 4c %D I"4c - 4c .4 j i-4

CJ-4 LUccCV

w 4 L CV) W-4 C.-4 r- 4D0 'v -4 1-4 -4 oI P-LU ow -MELU -

1-J CL L

cc I--

LL. CA -i U

Co~0D I- CA1 1

= = cc I-LUJ 4It J

LL.Z <U)nI-- < J 03 L-u

Ci W ) C9 co LUIw..JL Zi uj 2 -%-.. < - 0 0 uJ.J C)LU < <OU)4-

cc u0 C3 0 LAJ I-- )>-'1I-- C D<>-~. u V) 2 i1

0c < 0 : ZLUI - C0-' 1 ..J .. J L< -

Z 0 ~ 0 0L U C L V <-4 0 4 3 0 1 c-2c -a 3 D C - - aL V )4 -O0.o1 A O L3cU be4Z U~ le CeU c crc - -4'-4I- ~C3 = 8 C 1-O= = C5-

C--- 1.- 00 U c ) = i.- LU.- M 3LL«Ca V) >--I OLC LU4 u u- 0<

.. J W. V) 0: W LL LU = )Z NC z>- :LU0 CLocCoc < J 4 a i >U- LU -i- w I- Ln

U)U)~ I-- .J- w)-~L M Z '- C LJ -U 0 w

ZZZ z w= < LU EC~r= 10 U L 93

1- 4J

~ CD1-* -4 - Zi 0-- 4-4 0- -W4-4 :o---4--4 ),C 211C

P-4 ~ ~ ~ '20 0- w zo-I

26

TABLE 6

AVERAGE PERCENT TIME SPENT PERFORMING DUTIES BY 811XO DAFSC GROUPS

DAFSC DAFSC81130/ DAFSC 81199/81150 81170 CEM CODE

DUTIES (N=2.887) (N=1.028) (N=118)

A PLANNING AND ORGANIZING 3 10 25B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 3 10 21C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING 2 10 30D TRAINING 3 8 3E PERFORMING GENERAL ADMINISTRATION TASKS 10 12 6F PERFORMING GENERAL SECURITY OR LAW

ENFORCEMENT (LE) TASKS 42 24 5G PERFORMING LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS

TASKS 1 1 1H PERFORMING INFORMATION SECURITY, CRIME

PREVENTION, OR RESOURCE PROTECTION TASKS 1 2 3I MAINTAINING STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS

SECURITY 5 3 *J PERFORMING BASE, WEAPONS ST)RAGE, OR

AIRCRAFT SECURITY SYSTEMS TASKS 3 2 *K PERFORMING DISASTER CO'TROL TASKS 1 2 1L PERFORMING DETENTION OR CONFINEMENT

PROGRAM TASKS * * *M PERFORMING CUSTOMS TASKS * * *N PERFORMING MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD)

OR PATROL HORSE PROGRAM TASKS * * *0 PERFORMING INDIVIDUAL WEAPONS

MAINTENANCE OR ARMORY TASKS 14 7 2P PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED

EMERGENCY SERVICE TEAM (EST) OPERATIONS I 1 *Q PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED AIR BASE

GROUND (ABGD) OPERATIONS 10 8 3R PERFORMING TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OR

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS * * *

* Less than .5 percent

27

TABLE 7

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY81130/81150 PERSONNEL

(N=2,887)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

0695 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE GAU-5As OR M-16 RIFLES 77F334 FIRE WEAPONS TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION 72F398 STAND GUAROMOUNT 710694 APPLY WEAPONS PRESERVATIVES OR LUBRICANTS 690705 CLEAN WEAPON MECHANISMS OR PARTS 67F378 RESPOND TO DURESS OR ALARM ACTIVATIONS 64F294 BRIEF POST RELIEFS 63F382 RESPOND TO PRIORITY RESOURCE SECURITY SITUATIONS, SUCH AS

HELPING-HAND OR COVERED-WAGON 54F365 PERFORM RESTRICTED AREA SENTRY DUTIES 49F355 HANDCUFF SUBJECTS 490707 INSPECT WEAPONS OPERATIONAL CONDITION 47F306 CONDUCT SUSPECT KNEELING SEARCHES, WITHOUT MWDs 460718 PERFORM WEAPONS FUNCTIONAL CHECKS 46F332 EXAMINE RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED AREA BADGES 46F355 OPERATE VEHICLE RADIOS OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS 44F305 CONDUCT SUSPECT GROUND SEARCHES, WITHOUT MWDs 44F300 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 42F337 INSPECT INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT FOR SERVICEABILITY 420697 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M-203 GRENADE LAUNCHERS 42F370 PERFORM TACTICAL DEPLOYMENT FROM NONHARDENED OR STANDARD

VEHICLES 42F356 PERFORM CLOSE BOUNDARY SENTRY DUTIES 41F291 APPREHEND SUBJECTS 39F369 PERFORM TACTICAL DEPLOYMENT FROM HARDENED VEHICLES 36F331 EVALUATE SITUATIONS AT ALARM ACTIVATIONS 350698 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M-60, M2 HEAVY BARREL (HB) .50

CALIBER OR M249 MACHINE GUNS 35F357 PERFORM CONTROLLED AREA SENTRY DUTIES 32F367 PERFORM SECURITY POLICE VEHICLE OPERATOR MAINTENANCE 31F319 EMPLOY INDIVIDUAL OR TEAM TACTICAL MOVEMENTS, OTHER THAN

MOUNTED 30

AVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED - 56

28

TABLE 8

TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEENDAFSCs 81130/81150 AND 81170 PERSONNEL

(PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING)

DAFSC DAFSC81130/50 81170

TASKS (N=2.887) (N=1.028) DIFF

F356 PERFORM CLOSE BOUNDARY SENTRY DUTIES 41 13 +28

F365 PERFORM RESTRICTED AREA SENTRY DUTIES 49 22 +27

0697 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M-203 GRENADELAUNCHERS 42 16 +26

0698 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M-60, M2HEAVY BARREL (HB) .50 CALIBER ORM249 MACHINE GUNS 35 11 +24

F398 STAND GUARDMOUNT 71 49 +22

F357 PERFORM CONTROLLED AREA SENTRY DUTIES 32 11 +21

C135 WRITE EPRs 27 69 -42

B40 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL ORMILITARY MATTERS 25 66 -41

C91 CONDUCT POST CHECKS 11 48 -37

A8 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 12 43 -31

B38 CONDUCT GUAROMOUNT 7 33 -26

A19 DEVELOP OR IMPROVE WORK METHODS ORPROCEDURES 10 32 -22

D145 CONDUCT OJT 28 48 -20

29

This relatively low supervisory activity is further highlighted by the factthat only 14 percent of the 1,028 people forming this group are found in thesupervisory and staff-type jobs (i.e., MANAGEMENT AND STAFF, QUALITY CONTROL,UNIT TRAINING, VEHICLE CONTROL) discussed earlier in the SPECIALTY JOBSsection (see Table 5). While the display of tasks in Table 9 clearly showsthat these NCOs are responsible for supervision, it also reflects the rangeand scope of the job, in that relatively high percentages of the group arealso performing such basic technical tasks as handcuffing subjects, respondingto duress or alarm activations, and cleaning weapon mechanisms or parts.Career ladder diversity is also a factor for 7-skill level personnel, sinceonly seven tasks are performed by 50 percent or more of this group.

DAFSC 81199 and CEM Code 81100. As is typical of most career fields,personnel in the 9-skill level and CEM Code groups reported performing pri-marily nontechnical tasks. They performed an average of 62 tasks, with 42tasks accounting for over 50 percent of their relative job time. Groupmembers spent over 85 percent of their duty time on supervisory and trainingfunctions and managerial-type administrative tasks and are represented in onlyfour of the identified jobs (see Table 5). The largest segment (65 percent)are members of the MANAGEMENT AND STAFF CLUSTER. Table 10 displays represent-ative tasks for the group, while Table 11 presents tasks which reflect differ-ences between these more senior NCOs and 7-skill level personnel. Table 6displays the predominantly staff nature of these NCOs' jobs and that thesepersonnel are the primary managers in the career ladder.

Summary

Distinctions between 811X0 skill level groups are evident, with personnelat the 3- and 5-skill levels spending the vast majority of their job timeperforming technical tasks across a number of different jobs. At the 7-skilllevel, although members still spend over half of their relative duty time onnonsupervisory tasks, a shift toward supervisory functions is quite clear.The low numbers of tasks performed by 50 percent or more of the 3-/5-skilllevel group and the 7-skill level group (as well as the high number of dif-ferent jobs in which they perform) suggest a diverse career ladder for thesepersonnel. Nine-skill level and CEM Code members are basically managers andsupervisors performing predominantly supervisory and managerial tasks.

ANALYSIS OF 811X0 AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS

Survey data were compared to the AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions forSecurity Specialist and Security Supervisor, dated 31 October 1991, andSecurity Police Superintendent, dated 30 April 1991. These descriptions areintended to give a broad overview of the duties and tasks performed in theskill levels of the specialty.

30

TABLE 9

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY81170 PERSONNEL

(N=1,028)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

C135 WRITE EPRs 69B40 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY RELATED MATTERS 660695 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE GAU-5As OR M-16 RIFLES 64F334 FIRE WEAPONS TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION 63B78 SUPERVISE SECURITY SPECIALISTS (AFSC 81150) 600694 APPLY WEAPONS PRESERVATIVES OR LUBRICANTS 590705 CLEAN WEAPON MECHANISMS OR PARTS 55F398 STAND GUARDMOUNT 49F294 BRIEF POST RELIEFS 48D145 CONDUCT OJT 480170 REVIEW TRAINING RECORDS, REPORTS, OR RELATED DATA 48C91 CONDUCT POST CHECKS 48F378 RESPOND TO DURESS OR ALARM ACTIVATIONS 48B88 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 45F377 INSPECT INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT FOR SERVICEABILITY 45F382 RESPOND TO PRIORITY RESOURCE SECURITY SITUATIONS, SUCH AS

HELPING-HAND OR COVERED-WAGON 44A8 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 43F355 OPERATE VEHICLE RADIOS OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS 43A36 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 41F367 PERFORM SECURITY POLICE VEHICLE OPERATOR MAINTENANCE 400707 INSPECT WEAPONS OPERATIONAL CONDITION 40F293 BRIEF CENTRAL SECURITY CONTROL (CSC) OR LAW ENFORCEMENT

(LE) DESKS ON SECURITY STATUS 40A4 CONDUCT BRIEFINGS, OTHER THAN DISPATCH, DEPARTURE, POST

RELIEF, PATROL, PRISONER, OR FACILITY VISITOR BRIEFINGS 39A34 PLAN OR SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 38A2 ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 370718 PERFORM WEAPONS FUNCTIONAL CHECKS 37D150 COUNSEL TRAINEES ON TRAINING PROGRESS 36F331 EVALUATE SITUATIONS AT ALARM ACTIVATIONS 36Al ADVISE STAFF PERSONNEL ON TRAINING MATTERS 36F335 HANDCUFF SUBJECTS 36


31

TABLE 10

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY81199/81100 PERSONNEL

(N=118)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

B88 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 85B40 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY RELATED MATTERS 82Al ADVISE STAFF PERSONNEL ON TRAINING MATTERS 76A8 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 75C130 REVIEW INSPECTION REPORTS 75C135 WRITE EPRs 74A19 DEVELOP OR IMPROVE WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 72C89 ANALYZE INSPECTION REPORTS 71AS COORDINATE SUPPORT WITH BASE SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 70C125 INDORSE ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORTS (EPR) 70A4 CONDUCT BRIEFINGS, OTHER THAN DISPATCH, DEPARTURE, POST

RELIEF, PATROL, PRISONER, OR FACILITY VISITOR BRIEFINGS 69C91 CONDUCT POST CHECKS 66B39 CONDUCT STAFF MEETINGS 66A37 WRITE JOB DESCRIPTIONS 66A2 ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 64C137 WRITE STAFF STUDIES, SURVEYS, SPECIAL REPORTS, OR

REGULATION SUPPLEMENTS 61B71 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES 58A36 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 58A34 PLAN OR SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 58C100 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH WORK STANDARDS 55A6 COORDINATE WITH MILITARY OR CIVILIAN AGENCIES, FOR OTHER

THAN CONVOYS OR PRISONER RELEASE CONFERENCES 54B75 REVIEW ADMINISTRATIVE CORRESPONDENCE OR REPORTS 53C124 EVALUATE WORK SCHEDULES 51A7 r-TERMINE REQUIREMENTS FOR SPACE, PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT, OR

SUPPLIES, FOR OTHER THAN MWD OR HORSE PROGRAMS 50C90 ANALYZE WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS 50C122 EVALUATE SUGGESTIONS 50A29 DRAFT ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS (01),

OR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 49A31 ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 49


32

TABLE 11

TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEENDAFSC 81170 AND 81199/CEM CODE PERSONNEL


DAFSCDAFSC 81199/81170 CEM CODE

TASKS (N=1.028) (N=118) DIFFB78 SUPERVISE SECURITY SPECIALISTS (AFSC

81150) 60 19 +41

F335 HANDCUFF SUBJECTS 36 2 +34

F291 APPREHEND SUBJECTS 33 3 +30

F332 EXAMINE RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED AREABADGES 30 3 +27

F293 BRIEF CENTRAL SECURITY CONTROL (CSC) ORLAW ENFORCEMENT (LE) DESKS ON SECURITYSTATUS 40 14 +26

E190 INITIATE AF FORMS 1169 (STATEMENT OFWITNESS) 31 7 +24

E187 INITIATE AF FORMS 1168 (STATEMENT OFSUSPECT) 27 6 +21

B39 CONDUCT STAFF MEETINGS 11 66 -55

C130 REVIEW INSPECTION REPORTS 24 75 -51

C125 INDORSE ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORTS(EPR) 23 70 -47

Al ADVISE STAFF PERSONNEL ON TRAININGMATTERS 36 76 -40

C120 EVALUATE SECURITY POLICE REPORTS 14 47 -33

C98 EVALUATE BUDGET OR FINANCIALREQUIREMENTS 5 35 -30

A31 ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 25 49 -24

33

The 3-/5-skill level specialty description is generally accurate anddepicts the highly technical nature of the job, as well as the scope of thejob. Some improvements, however, may be possible.

Paragraphs 1 and 2d refer to the performance of corrections program tasksas being representative of the 3-/5-skill level job. Analysis of the tasksperformed which relate to the corrections function, however, indicates thisactivity is a very limited part of this group's responsibility. None of thetasks associated with the corrections program reflected more than one percentof this group responding, and the majority of the tasks received no responseat all. References to the corrections function should be evaluated to deter-mine if there is justification for retention in the specialty description inlight of this limited involvement.

The 7-skill level description accurately portrays the combinationsupervisory and technical nature and scope of this group's job. As wasdiscussed in the 3-/5-skill level description analysis, references to thecorrections function should be evaluated for retention in the specialtydescription.

The description for the 81199 and CEM Code personnel accurately reflectsthe managerial nature of the job.

811X0 TRAINING ANALYSIS

Occupational survey data are one of the many sources of information whichcan be used to assist in the development of a training program relevant to theneeds of personnel in their first enlistment. Factors which may be used inevaluating training include the overall description of the job being performedby first-enlistment personnel and their overall distribution across careerladder jobs, percentages of first-job (1-24 months TAFMS) or first-enlistment(1-48 months TAFMS) members performing specific tasks or using certain wea-pons, equipment, or tactics, as well as TE and TO ratings (previouslyexplained in the SURVEY METHODOLOGY section).

To assist specifically in evaluation of the Specialty Training Standard(STS) and the Plan of Instruction (POI), technical school personnel fromLackland Training Center matched job inventory tasks to appropriate sectionsand subsections of the STS and POI for course L3ABR81130-003. It was thismatching upon which comparison to those documents was based. A completecomputer listing displaying the percent members performing tasks, TE and TOratings for each task, along with the STS and POI matchings, has been for-warded to the technical school for their use in further detailed reviews ofappropriate training documents. A summary of this information is presentedbelow.

34

First-Enlistment Personnel

In this study, there are 1,465 811X0 members in their first enlistment(1-48 months TAFMS), representing 24 percent of the total survey sample. Thejob performed by these personnel is highly technical in nature, accounting forapproximately 96 percent of their relative duty time (see Table 12). WhileTable 12 shows that first-term airmen spend some of their job time in avariety of career ladder functional areas, the majority is concentrated ontasks pertaining to general security, individual weapons maintenance, ABGDoperations, and strategic missile systems security, as well as performinggeneral administrative tasks. Distribution of these personnel in the careerladder jobs is displayed in Figure 2, which clearly -nows group membersdispersed across a number of the groups identified in the SPECIALTY JOBSanalysis, although the majority are involved in jobs associated with aircraft,weapons storage, and missile security functions. Table 13 displays some ofthe average 49 tasks performed by the group, and, by virtue of the relativelylow percentages performing any given task, also reflects the diversity of thecareer ladder (only 12 tasks are performed by 50 percent or more of thisgroup).

One of the objectives of this survey project was to gather data for thetraining center pertaining to weapons carried or utilized, security policetactics or procedures used or practiced, equipment used or operated, as wellas utilization of armed or unarmed physical apprehension and restraint tech-niques (PART). Accordingly, Tables 14 through 19 present percentages offirst-term airmen responding to questions concerning their activities involv-ing these items. This type of information is useful for both the technicalschool and MAJCOM training personnel to assist them in focusing limitedtraining time or other resources on the most utilized items.

Training Emphasis and Task Difficulty Data

Training emphasis (TE) and task difficulty (TD) data are secondaryfactors that can assist technical school personnel in deciding which tasksshould be emphasized in entry-level training. These ratings, based on thejudgments of senior career ladder NCOs working at operational units in thefield, are collected to provide training personnel with a rank-ordering ofthose tasks in the job inventory considered important for first-term airmantraining (TE) (see Table 20 for the top-rated tasks), along with a measure ofthe difficulty of the job inventory tasks (TD) (see the highest rated taskspresented in Table 21). When combined with data on the percentages of first-enlistment personnel performing tasks, comparisons can then be made to deter-mine if training adjustments are necessary. For example, tasks receiving highratings on both task factors, accompanied by moderate to high percentagesperforming, may warrant resident training. Those tasks receiving high taskfactor ratings, but low percentages performing, may be more appropriatelyplanned for OJT programs within the career ladder. Low task factor ratingsmay highlight tasks best omitted from training for first-term personnel, butthis decision must be weighed against percentages of personnel performing thetasks, command concerns, and criticality of the tasks.

35

0

mi 2 0

3. L)

44 z "4 t"4 a.i 9-40

z*

z =

CCC

CL C -4

z~ az

LA w 40

Cd '

toI IL aI0 u-,,4 j

CE-

x Cf ) 500

Zww'I..

U Z )00

LL 0

a.W'

36.

TABLE 12

RELATIVE TIME SPENT ON DUTIESBY 811XO FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=1,465)

PERCENT

DUTIES TIME SPENT

A PLANNING AND ORGANIZING 1

B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 1

C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING 1

D TRAINING I

E PERFORMING GENERAL ADMINISTRATION TASKS 7

F PERFORMING GENERAL SECURITY OR LAW ENFORCEMENT (LE) TASKS 49

G PERFORMING LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS TASKS 1

H PERFORMING INFORMATION SECURITY, CRIME PREVENTION, ORRESOURCE tROTECTION TASKS 1

I MAINTAINING STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS SECURITY 6

J PERFORMING BASE, WEAPONS STORAGE, OR AIRCRAFT SECURITYSYSTEMS TASKS 4

K PERFORMING DISASTER CONTROL TASKS I

L PERFORMING DETENTION OR CONFINEMENT PROGRAM TASKS *

M PERFORMING CUSTOMS TASKS *

N PERFORMING MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) OR PATROL HORSE PROGRAMTASKS *

0 PERFORMING INDIVIDUAL WEAPONS MAINTENANCE OR ARMORY TASKS 17

P PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED EMERGENCY SERVICE TEAM (EST)OPERATIONS

Q PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED AIR BASE GROUND DEFENSE (ABGD)OPERATIONS 11

R PERFORMING TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS *


37

TABLE 13

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMEDBY 811XO FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=1,465)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

0695 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE GAU-5As OR M-16 RIFLES 79F398 STAND GUARDMOUNT 75F334 FIRE WEAPONS TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION 740694 APPLY WEAPONS PRESERVATIVES OR LUBRICANTS 710705 CLEAN WEAPON MECHANISMS OR PARTS 70F378 RESPOND TO DURESS OR ALARM ACTIVATIONS 68F294 BRIEF POST RELIEFS 64F365 PERFORM RESTRICTED AREA SENTRY DUTIES 57F382 RESPOND TO PRIORITY RESOURCE SECURITY SITUATIONS, SUCH AS

HELPING-HAND OR COVERED-WAGON 56F332 EXAMINE RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED AREA BADGES 52F356 PERFORM CLOSE BOUNDARY SENTRY DUTIES 51F335 HANDCUFF SUBJECTS 500697 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M-203 GRENADE LAUNCHERS 49F306 CONDUCT SUSPECT KNEELING SEARCHES, WITHOUT MWDs 49F317 EMPLOY CHALLENGE TECHNIQUES, OTHER THAN COMBAT CHALLENGES 48F307 CONDUCT SUSPECT WALL SEARCHES, WITHOUT MWDs 470718 PERFORM WEAPONS FUNCTIONAL CHECKS 47F305 CONDUCT SUSPECT GROUND SEARCHES, WITHOUT MWDs 460707 INSPECT WEAPONS OPERATIONAL CONDITION 45F293 BRIEF CENTRAL SECURITY CONTROL (CSC) OR LAW ENFORCEMENT

(LE) DESKS ON SECURITY STATUS 44F300 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 44F370 PERFORM TACTICAL DEPLOYMENT FROM NONHARDENED OR STANDARD

VEHICLES 430698 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M-60, M2 HEAVY BARREL (HB) .50

CALIBER OR M249 MACHINE GUNS 43F355 OPERATE VEHICLE RADIOS OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS 42F357 PERFORM CONTROLLED AREA SENTRY DUTIES 39F337 INSPECT INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT FOR SERVICEABILITY 39F369 PERFORM TACTICAL DEPLOYMENT FROM HARDENED VEHICLES 38F387 SEARCH GOVERNMENT MOTOR VEHICLES (GMV) AT RESTRICTED AREA

OR INSTALLATION ENTRY POINTS, WITHOUT MWDs 37J496 CONTROL ENTRY INTO RESTRICTED AREAS, OTHER THAN MISSILE

SECURITY AREAS 35F331 EVALUATE SITUATIONS AT ALARM ACTIVATIONS 34


38

TABLE 14

NUMBER OF TIMES ARMED PHYSICALAPPREHENSION AND RESTRAINT TECHNIQUE (PART)

USED DURING LAST 12 MONTHS (OTHER THAN TRAINING)BY 811X0 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=1,465)

PERCENTMEMBERS

NUMBER OF TIMES USED RESPONDING*

DID NOT USE 82%1-3 TIMES 13%4-6 TIMES 2%7-9 TIMES 0%10 OR MORE TIMES 1%

*Column may not add to 100 percent due to nonresponse or rounding

TABLE 15

NUMBER OF TIMES UNARMED PART USED DURINGLAST 12 MONTHS (OTHER THAN TRAINING)BY 811XO FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=1,465)

PERCENTMEMBERS


DID NOT USE 84%1-3 TIMES 10%4-6 TIMES 2%7-9 TIMES 0%10 OR MORE TIMES 1%

* Column may not add to 100 percent due to nonresponse or rounding

39

TABLE 16

PRESENT ROLE IN ABGD FOR 811XOFIRST-JOB AND FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

PERCENTMEMBERS RESPONDING

1-24 MOS 1-48 MOS1ST JOB 1ST ENLABGD ROLE TITLE (N=556) (N=1.465)

FIRE TEAM LEADER 0% 4%

FIRE TEAM MEMBER (NOT LEADER OR RADIO TELEPHONEOPERATOR) 71% 62%

FLIGHT COMMANDER 0% 0%

FLIGHT LEADER 0% 0%

FLIGHT SERGEANT 0% 0%

HEAVY WEAPONS GUN CREW MEMBER 5% 4%

MWD PATROL DOG HANDLER 0% 0%

MWD EXPLOSIVE DETECTOR DOG HANDLER 0% 0%

RADIO TELEPHONE OPERATOR (FT MBR) 1% 2%

RADIO TELEPHONE OPERATOR (HQS ELM) 0% 0%

SQUAD LEADER 0% 0%

DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN ABGD 20% 25%

OTHER 3% 3%

40

. . .. - ........... .. U

TABLE 17

WEAPONS CARRIED OR UTILIZED BY 5 PERCENTOR MORE OF 811X0 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=1,465)

PERCENTMEMBERS

WEAPONS RESPONDING

M16 RIFLE 93

M203 GRENADE LAUNCHER 51

M60 MACHINE GUN 45

M9 9MM HANDGUN 32

SMOKE GRENADE 14

GAU-5A 11

SLAP FLARE 7

RIOT BATON 6

M15 .38 REVOLVER 5


41

TABLE 18

SECURITY POLICE TACTICS OR PROCEDURESUSED OR PRACTICED BY 10 PERCENT OR MOREOF 811X0 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=1,465)

PERCENTMEMBERSTACTICS OR-PROCEDURES RESPONDING

DURESS PROCEDURES 83HANDCUFFING 80INDIVIDUAL SEARCHES 78VEHICLE SEARCHES 70COVER AND CONCEALMENT 68HAND AND ARM SIGNALS 65RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 65VEHICLE DEPLOYMENT 65CHALLENGE AND REPLY 61BUILDING SEARCHES 55HIGH CRAWL 52LOW CRAWL 51OPEN AREA SEARCHES 47RUSH AND ROLL 46CAMOUFLAGE 39NBC PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT/CLOTHING 38VEHICLE STOP 37FIRE AND MANEUVER 35NBC RECOGNITION 34NBC WARNINGS 34BOUNDING OVERWATCH 33TRAVELING OVERWATCH 30NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL, OR CHEMICAL (NBC) FIELD DECONTAMINATION 28SECTOR DEFENSE 25TARGET RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION 24PERSONAL FIELD HYGIENE 22COMBAT FIRST AID 22OBSERVATION AND SOUND TECHNIQUES 21TRAFFIC STOP 19BUILT UP AREA SEARCHES 17RECONNAISSANCE PATROL 17ACTIVE DEFENSIVE MEASURES 17TACTICAL BARRIERS 15PASSIVE DEFENSIVE MEASURES 14COMBAT PATROL 14AIRBORNE ATTACK DEFENSE OR RUNWAY DENIAL 12FIELD FORTIFICATIONS 12COUNTER AMBUSH 11FIRE CONTROL ORDER EXECUTION 10

42

TABLE 19

EQUIPMENT USED OR OPERATED BY 10 PERCENTOR MORE OF 811XO FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=1,465)

PERCENTEQUIPMENT MEMBERSRESPONDING

HANDCUFFS 78RADIO, HAND-HELD (NONTACTICAL) 76

GAS MASK 74HELMET, STEEL OR KEVLAR

71WEAPONS CLEANING EQUIPMENT 64BODY ARMOR

GRID MAP 43CAMOUFLAGE EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES, PERSONAL 40LOAD BEARING EQUIPMENT (HARNESS, WEB BELT, AMMO POUCH) 40FLEXCUFF 35BASE STATION WIRE 34

CB SCANNERS OR RADIO 33SPOTLIGHT OR OTHER ILLUMINATION DEVICE 32METAL TRANSFRISKER 32NBC CLOTHING 27INSPECTION MIRROR 26NIGHT OBSERVATION OR SIGHTING DEVICE (NOD) 22CAMOUFLAGE EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES, UNIT 22FIRST AID EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES (NOT NBC) 19BARBED WIRE 19NBC PERSONAL DECONTAMINATION EQUIPMENT 17VEHICLE OR PORTABLE PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM 16TYPEWRITER 16CONCERTINA WIRE 16BACK OR BUTT PACK 16INTERIOR INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM 15FIELD TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT (TA-i/PT, TA-312/PT) 14FIELD GLASSES 13COMPUTER SYSTEM (OTHER THAN AFLETS) 11HELMET, RIOT CONTROL 11MULTIPLE INTEGRATED LASER ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM (MILES) 11

43

COC~J t)CW wt Ln.4t

OD U- )

) E L LA) -W LA) N. M -4 LI)

'-L

LUn

cm 0E)

I-L.-

LLLU

LAJ

Q z CD C1U) CN.

0e C-

C), 31: p.-LCC

0t 01-LI 0cmc-4I LL1- n

*-4i I LU -c0 -j 0- -.1

cr LU<LC> cm LI 0 C0

9^~ 0 =- < =_ DUi ) COJ I

cn 01 be -'5I LU ccIMuI-- CC -r u -4C

-) 1- U I- <) LA-UW -u 0-) U.) w ILU =- M - LU 0m w 0c c

.1c U-I U) LU4--0 C) X) -u C-) M) L .

U) .0 AC LA o-4JLU. 1-- D 0 LU C) C 0l EU

=4 3c) < LU LC-) CL 0' I U) 0V-

0 LUJ b- L oVzQ)C M) 00 U. w LU U) 0VC

LU~~~0 U) L>< -Id: e4 q... 0- %0 %D 0nCj L

U) r,, OD e ON CD .. C31 LU r 061CV . I O C-) 0n en m .,-

U . LA .z 1.1 U. a- a- .. U- <

~ U ~ U) ) .. ) U 44C

'-4 0

0 V) r- () %D Ln U r- en) r-4

LL1

LU) I

ULJ j clJ C'J ci 40 Cli -4 cmJ - - -

Q Z4

ix LL)J - t

ON4 - r- -4 0 V -I& 0 i 0D CD C

I-

LA-00, -j. - ~ ~ '

C3 I 0 L L(J (N 4 vi -

LUUa

0 0

LLJ Cl M: i

CD LUIc L0 x -ri LUJ

b - LUJ LU Cflc-, cc LUJ

LU ( 0 dA 4n L

P- ix <- C )

o .4 z- LU II- Cl C. -) 0- W- V) 0 LU-

Z D -i0 LUJ a3-a-i LU) V) V) ix CA V- ) V) U

cr LUI V) .. - 1 CD0>- 0 m 0DC CL LUi m. - -

O-d C-] >- i- 01i= LU U) 0 C) LU- '

LU~ ~ - w U ai0. r-U)~ ~ V- -o00.I C.I

I-J I.- (D LU LU w. LU LU L LLL L LUZ LU -i LU a-i a.-' LU -0

31 03 m. LUI 0 LU 03 0 0 C.a

co %D %D m. ~ 00 0o 0 $z0 (IJ< 0J (N CV) 1%. a as .- n i) -W

-LU<LL. a. < u 0o 00oC

45

To assist technical school personnel, USAFOMS has developed a computerprogram that incorporates these secondary factors and the percentage offirst-enlistment personnel performing each task into a computed value identi-fied as an Automated Traii.ing Indicator (ATI). These ATI values correspond totraining decisions listed and defined in the Training Decision Logic Tablefound in Attachment 1, ATCR 52-22. These values allow course personnel toquickly focus their attention on those tasks which are most likely to qualifyfor ABR course consideration.

Various lists of tasks, accompanied by TE and TD ratings, and whereappropriate, ATI values, are contained in the 811X0 TRAINING EXTRACT packageand should be reviewed in detail by technical school personnel. (For a moredetailed explanation of TE and TD ratings, see Task Factor Administration inthe SURVEY METHODOLOGY section of this report.)

Specialty Training Standard (STS)

A comprehensive review of STS 811X0, dated November 1988, compared STSitems to survey data (based on the previously mentioned assistance fromtechnical school personnel in matching job inventory tasks to STS elements).STS paragraphs containing general knowledge information, mandatory entries,subject-matter-knowledge-only requirements, or basic supervisory responsi-bilities were not examined. Task knowledge and performance elements of theSTS were compared against the standard set forth in AFR 8-13 (dated1 August 1986) and AFR 8-13/ATC Supplement 1 (dated 2 March 1987), Attachment1, paragraph A1-3c(4) (i.e., include tasks performed or knowledge required by20 percent or more of the personnel in a skill level (criterion group) of theAFS).

Overall, the STS provides comprehensive coverage of the work performed bypersonnel in this career ladder, with survey data supporting most of theessential paragraphs or subparagraphs. Even though some elements did not havehigh percentages of personnel performing matched tasks, the fact that thesupporting tasks were a part of an identifiable job being performed in thecareer ladder supports the retention of the STS element involving those tasks.

A few elements of the STS were not supported by occupational survey dataand do require review by training personnel and subject-matter experts. Table22 displays these elements and survey data pertaining to tasks matched tothese elements. Even though the tasks shown reflect high TE ratings, and someabove average TD ratings as well, the low task performance figures suggestevaluation to justify retention in the STS is warranted.

Tasks not matched to any element of the STS are listed at the end of theSTS computer listing. These were reviewed to determine if there were anytasks concentrated around any particular functions or jobs. No particulartrends were noted. Technical-type tasks performed by 20 percent or morerespondents of the STS target groups, but which were not referenced to any STSelement, are displayed in Table 23. Training personnel and subject-matterexperts should review these tasks to determine if inclusion in the STS isjustified.

46

*1 0l 0! C

001

o

L)C %j(Al 0 141 V4CW) Cj

coo11

-

LL L)0C)J 0l-

LU LL-4-0. < -4CJC

000 11

CD c

>-LU-i41r n L U

U)0. E LfL

C ) '.0

)-LL co I.-OJ rt~

0Uo L) ac C) u 40to

0.

0 j >

-C J II 4-'OCJ I u LI-. 7.3 I

I- CA.I 4A I I 0 n1V)I I = : . I LJ I I I V

(^(4 1 0 LJ -1 =D I I I -0 b I L.1 I u qAI L 1 > I cr I I I .( I L- I I L I =I I I I0

1W c ILU ..I L- I = I 1 1LUI I U al I I

1-4 Is >1 &. S I I0I-a' fIU)I v IaO U'. 4) 1 F- I I C.'

IU C) IU > 4nl %A l I I IL. IUcS r 0 I )J 1~ ) I>

U) III L- I- %w- 1C. S 1 1 I CL 1

C 10- 1 4-0 10-1 1 0 1I 1I I I 0n4-4J I ) - I c I I I I- SLII I a

I < I a. I a) = ILII 'a I 1 0LU I CDl I . L ILUm I -W I 1 0 1 1 - or

LU Iw I Sw IM4. Il V A I-I L. I cn I %A0Isca $- I~l = 00r I czI u 1(01 0 4

.4c *. I I mCP ~Il I I U I 1 -40II0 3E1 IO E I I C- cc

I Ce LL -I I $-~ I LUS 01

LU :0 - )i 6OC I LL.- 1 1 0- 1I- = 41.'1-(A I m. ) I S L 0 L03 1 cc1 L. 1(01IZJI E L.- I ZlI C to- I U 1 1 0 4 IV

-1 1 1 0'- I< -j W I D- I1 CL I A I )oc

0-4 1~ .Ci l I En I I Ma~ 1.-I )%G IlI m%3I I I en LII 0I- I .- I 0L 01 0 I I .0

IIt LU IJI LU 101 0- I I UE I LM I iL I o I I It

* I I I I I 47

OD CD) r-.

V)) 0 C0

0. '-

Ac.-4 -4

00

oe

-C'

)- zLU

Ln cm

LUSuLS . Lfl c

I-- LD

S LU

Z -LU L U

C-) CL.j -O

4- C'..1 0IU LU t

I aU aI i a aia- 0 c I I LL '13 1 0 1. 1 - I -0

LU I' I I C Ia I u CC w coaAC L Iz Wi 1 aL I V-~~~~ 94 a>, CD~ a a ca a C -

be I~ to Iu .1 .. I L5 I >~ Go oJu aIt ao .a aaLUa vi to a1 ca- a.a w 4a at, a o a tm-> 0

LU I-~ -IC 1~ . 1c. " , ao a- 0-a- 1-a *. #Aa Im I- I LG I- aU toLU aU a I awa 1i a6 -J af"... I~ oi oa- a o ao a< a L =- oCD

aD I .- I #~ C3i I I CL4. AI . a .-~, 00 iai L ac.i o.co00 cLO. ac ILIa....aE.U~a4za LU CAa 1 aoa I .(A a )a- a a a a

I am a a a m a aA aI a a a Ca a *a a li aa CA I ~ .% a aC

a- a a aoa a-ha 0' a480

00 r-0

I.L v-* ".4 CcQCJ

(JcV-a) co0 110 - U ~ CJ -

20

V-4-

LU < V-4 C Ej

0L.U 0) c

CJu 14.

0- uJ LU1

COLA.LU

C%j WLU %0 n C O-i LA.i L 0Cc cro CD-*

<LUZ

< Go a-

LU) V

ci CLC

z0I '< %DLU 00 ) 0

LUi Cie-

0U <LUL 1 CL EULU.1 06 04 C.

c ci iC) CDK i = L&JU LUJLU

0 U)a 0 Lu LU L9z LU -. 10 CD I~ 0)V.1)hOW - .. LU CL m C ~ C..

1)W % ..- 0 Vn Cc "

-; 0 c.) X C >C0U .J 0 LU a~ 00: LU do

w U.1 I- -K< w LU L-i = ZC. = iK 0 l'-. 1-0o 0occ Q U) 04- c < -K < . -PLU ~ "- eLI LA. LUI -K LU V-4 wV)C KI = c 0. CA) P- 0o0)An .1 F3C LUJ >- Z'' ''

r_ C" 0- %o.~% co V) ) co W"

0)e n 0m - C%0 U. IL. LU LU LU

49

Plan of Instruction (POlD

Based on the previously mentioned assistance from the technical schoolsubject-matter experts in matching inventory tasks to the 3ABR81130-003 POI,dated 8 February 1991, a computer product was generated displaying the resultsof the matching process. Information furnished for consideration includespercent members performing data for first-job (1-24 months TAFMS) and first-enlistment (1-48 months TAFMS) personnel, as well as training emphasis (TE)and task difficulty (TD) ratings for individual tasks.

POI blocks, units of instruction, and criterion objectives were comparedagainst the standard set forth in Attachment 1, ATCR 52-22, dated17 February 1989 (30 percent or more of the criterion first-enlistment groupperforming tasks trained, along with sufficiently high TE and TD ratings onthose tasks). Per this guidance, tasks trained in the course which do notmeet these criteria must be considered for elimination from the formal course,if not justified on some other acceptable basis.

Review of the tasks matched to the POI reveals that most POI units ofinstruction or criterion objectives are supported by OSR data (based onpercentages of first-term airmen performing tasks or high TE or TO ratings forpertinent tasks), or appear to be teaching steps in the instruction process.There are some units, however, which contain some objectives that apparentlyare not supported by these criteria and require further evaluation by trainingpersonnel and subject-matter experts (see examples in Table 24). While all ofthe selected sample tasks received high TE ratings (3.50 or above), allreflect less than 30 percent of the first-term population performing, and onlytwo received above average TD ratings. The combination of low percent membersperforming and below average TD factors suggests the need for close examina-tion of objectives in pertinent units of instruction to determine if retentionof over 26 hours in the ABR course is justified.

ANALYSIS OF MAJOR COMMANDS (MAJCOM)

Tasks and background data for personnel of the nine MAJCOMs with thelargest 811X0 populations were compared to determine whether job contentvaried as a function of command assignment.

Generally', the jobs performed across the commands were similar, with manytasks performed in common. The largest percentages of duty time in eachcommand were committed to the performance of tasks involving general securityfunctions, general administration functions, and individual weapons mainte-nance or armory tasks (see Table 25). Minor variances were noted, withAFSPACECOM and ESC reporting slightly more time spent on general administra-tive tasks and less time devoted to ABGD operations. Additionally, ATC andSAC also reflected lower percentages of relative duty time spent on ABGOoperations tasks. SAC airmen were unique in that theirs was the only commandidentifying a significant amount of time spent on tasks dealing with missilesystems security.

50

40 CY

ig) 0n co % uCY coar.

u,&Ln CD &flU) CD L(n r.C

Li

a- qt 0% CDmat

uA LUJ "491. uI

L

I - .00

"4 CLU Un

= -%UA cm

1- -LL. 0 . u

gn 39- CDr.21 0 0 Z #At - 4

w 0. "4 2c "4c LU

LI(S U) C- =) a-j "4W wU c "C

I.- - =I Zu L. ujV)) 0 zi g2 c w iec0. 2W 0- CA LU W

(lU 2t~ 2. LL. of 4Z-U U. 0 in"' C

C3 ~ U. 2cU ccC -c -1A oz 0 Q LUVI- 1 La. =i X 0j0

~ULiZ " "L. cc a LU LICD t= ZO 0- 0j F- 0. LUt. 6

CL06 L26 CL U) 0

201-%a C7% W Y% ON)L 1

L.LL. U L . L LLU U. U) -5 LL. (E)

0E Im Ol *) ) 0)-

4ALL

LU In In 0 4m0

P"4 2-C "4

w M co 51

S 4 n P4 W0 4 0 in g0 34 4CY-

SI *e4 ~ .4 I . 0 - 3 .

m w4 mI I . 4N fob pq4 P3 N a4 e

Au 0 m V4 q 4.4 a a e4 w 4r

4 NI n -..

1rn P6 an 4 in #.4 .

mu -(D1.4g.

I--:00.a e n a 0-3 0n P4 tow 3

.04. .44

an4

- zU .a 9 4ta w 640a -I Upq au 0- a 9 u

mu 89 tomo 1 5 m

Au X u3 . ml a- : a g 0 ww 0 ut qu Zc 4. 1 Z mu14c

im a am IA t. - . 40 0 m . Slu 0U u

6-)" .- .IIIIaIIaP* Zns m -m"

uu u w 4 * ~ 0.

zm

4., *

49 a u a w z 1 -1 z

52m

SECTION III

ANALYSIS OF 811X2 DAFSC GROUPS

As explained in SECTION II, data pertaining to DAFSC groups are importantto the analysis of each career ladder. Since a comparison of duty and taskperformance between DAFSCs 81132 and 81152 indicated no substantial differencein the jobs they perform, they will be discussed as a combined group in thisreport. As previously indicated, DAFSC 81199 and CEM Code 81100 were alsocombined for reporting purposes.

The distribution of skill level groups across the career ladder jobs isdisplayed in Table 26, while Table 27 offers another perspective by displayingthe relative percent time spent on each duty across the skill level groups. Atypical pattern of progression is present, with personnel spending more oftheir relative time on duties involving supervisory, managerial, and trainingtasks as they move upward toward the 7-skill level, the 9-skill level, or theCEM Code. It is also obvious, though, that 7-skill level personnel are stillinvolved with technical task performance, as will be pointed out in thespecific skill level group discussions below.


DAFSCs 81132/81152. Representing 20 percent of the survey sample, the 1,220airmen in the 3- and 5-skill level group performed an average of 82 tasks.Performing a highly technical job, 71 percent of their relative duty time isdevoted to tasks pertaining to general law enforcement (LE), LE operations,traffic management or accident investigations, and the administrative tasksand forms required in law enforcement activities. An additional 14 percent oftheir relative duty time was committed to tasks associated with individualweapons maintenance and ABGD operations. Although represented in 13 of the 21jobs identified in the SPECIALTY JOBS section (see Table 26), the majority ofthese personnel are found in the INSTALLATION PATROL CLUSTER (56 percent) andINSTALLATION ENTRY CONTROL CLUSTER (14 percent). Table 28 displays selectedrepresentative time-consuming tasks performed by the highest percentages ofthese airmen. Table 29 displays those tasks which clearly differentiate the3-/5-skill level and 7-skill level groups.

DAFSC 81172. Seven-skill level personnel, representing 8 percent of thesurvey sample, perform an average of 95 tasks. Even though 76 percent reportsupervisory responsibilities, only 35 percent of their job time is spent ontasks in the usual supervisory, managerial, and training duties (see Table27). This relatively low supervisory activity is further highlighted by thefact that only 16 percent of the 508 people forming this group are found inthe supervisory and staff-type jobs (i.e., MANAGEMENT AND STAFF, QUALITYCONTROL, UNIT TRAINING) discussed earlier in the SPECIALTY JOBS section (seeTable 26). While the display of tasks in Table 30 clearly shows that these

53

z

a4 r

N'y

M ;~ 9 ,4t0 4 m N 0 m

IIIL

II L

.4

49

x14

U.

ac

u 0u

4U

U z

OM IOU*

0 49'I- m

I - J 9

z.4 1 a u - -

14 IL4 m~4 m4. 00m IL Z

a. I I 8 -u 0, 0

m f~iu a M i5I

TABLE 27

AVERAGE PERCENT TIME SPENT PERFORMING DUTIES BY 811X2 DAFSC GROUPS

DAFSC DAFSC81132/ DAFSC 81199/81152 81172 CEM CODE

DUTIES (N=1.220) (N=508) (N=118)

A PLANNING AND ORGANIZING 3 10 25B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 3 10 21C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING 2 10 30D TRAINING 2 5 3E PERFORMING GENERAL ADMINISTRATION TASKS 25 20 6F PERFORMING GENERAL SECURITY OR LAW

ENFORCEMENT (LE) TASKS 36 22 5G PERFORMING LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS

TASKS 6 5 1H PERFORMING INFORMATION, SECURITY, CRIME

PREVENTION, OR RESOURCE PROTECTION TASKS 2 3 3I MAINTAINING STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS

SECURITY *0J PERFORMING BASE, WEAPONS STORAGE, OR

AIRCRAFT SECURITY SYSTEMS TASKS * * *K PERFORMING DISASTER CONTROL TASKS 1 I 1L PERFORMING DETENTION OR CONFINEMENT

PROGRAM TASKS 2 3 *M PERFORMING CUSTOMS TASKS 1 1 *N PERFORMING MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD)

OR PATROL HORSE PROGRAM TASKS * * *0 PERFORMING INDIVIDUAL WEAPONS MAINTENANCE

OR ARMORY TASKS 7 3 2P PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED EMERGENCY

SERVICE TEAM (EST) OPERATIONS * *Q PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED AIR BASE

GROUND (ABGD) OPERATIONS 7 4 3R PERFORMING TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OR ACCIDENT

INVESTIGATIONS 4 3 *


55

TABLE 28

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMEDBY 81132/81152 PERSONNEL

(N=1 ,220)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

E190 INITIATE AF FORMS 1169 (STATEMENT OF WITNESS) 73E192 COMPLETE AF FORMS 1169 72E175 INITIATE AF FORMS 52 (EVIDENCE TAG) 72E189 COMPLETE AF FORMS 1168 69E177 COMPLETE AF FORMS 52 69F334 FIRE WEAPONS TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION 69E187 INITIATE AF FORMS 1168 (STATEMENT OF SUSPECT) 69F398 STAND GUARDMOUNT 65F289 ADVISE INDIVIDUALS OF THEIR RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE 31,

UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE (UCMJ) 650702 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M9 9MM OR M15 .38 CALIBER REVOLVERS 65F291 APPREHEND SUBJECTS 65E260 INITIATE OR COMPLETE DD FORMS 1408 (ARMED FORCES TRAFFIC

TICKET) 64F342 ISSUE TRAFFIC TICKETS OR VIOLATION NOTICES 64F335 HANDCUFF SUBJECTS 640695 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE GAU-5As OR M-16 RIFLES 620694 APPLY WEAPONS PRESERVATIVES OR LUBRICANTS 61F378 RESPOND TO DURESS OR ALARM ACTIVATIONS 61E196 INITIATE AF FORMS 1668 (FIELD INTERVIEW) 61F288 ADVISE INDIVIDUALS OF THEIR FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS 60F294 BRIEF POST RELIEFS 59F312 DIRECT TRAFFIC 59F339 INTERVIEW WITNESSES OR COMPLAINANTS 59E222 INITIATE OR COMPLETE AF FORMS 840 (MINOR MOTOR VEHICLE

ACCIDENT REPORT) 56F300 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 56F343 ISSUE VISITOR PASSES 54E264 INITIATE OR COMPLETE D FORMS 1920 (ALCOHOLIC INFLUENCE

REPORT) 52F307 CONDUCT SUSPECT WALL SEARCHES, WITHOUT MWDs 52F376 PROVIDE DIRECTIONS OR INFORMATION TO VISITORS 52F304 CONDUCT POV SIMPLE INSPECTIONS AT INSTALLATION ENTRY POINTS 51E204 INITIATE OR COMPLETE AF FORMS 75 (VISITOR/VEHICLE PASS

(STORAGE SAFEGUARD)) 51G432 SEIZE EVIDENCE 48F380 RESPOND TO ON-BASE DOMESTIC DISTURBANCES 48F364 PERFORM ON-BASE MOBILE PATROLS, WITHOUT MWDs OR HORSES 44


56

..--:

.

TABLE 29

TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEENDAFSCs 81132/81152 AND 81172 PERSONNEL


DAFSC DAFSC81132/52 81172

TASKS (N=1.220) (N=508) DIFF

F343 ISSUE VISITOR PASSES 54 27 +27

F300 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 56 31 +25

F352 OPEN OR CLOSE INSTALLATION PRIMARY ENTRYCONTROL POINTS 39 14 +25

F342 ISSUE TRAFFIC TICKETS OR VIOLATION NOTICES 64 42 +22

F304 CONDUCT POV SIMPLE INSPECTIONS ATINSTALLATION ENTRY POINTS 51 29 +22

F312 DIRECT TRAFFIC 59 38 +21

F363 PERFORM ON-BASE FOOT PATROLS, WITHOUT MWDs 44 23 +21

B88 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 20 66 -46


A8 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 15 54 -39

C91 CONDUCT POST CHECKS 10 46 -36

A34 PLAN OR SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 10 44 -34

B38 CONDUCT GUARDMOUNT 11 40 -29

C132 REVIEW SECURITY POLICE FORMS 14 40 -26

57

TABLE 30

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 81172 PERSONNEL(N=508)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

B88 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 66B40 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY RELATED MATTERS 65C135 WRITE EPRs 63F334 FIRE WEAPONS TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATIONS 58F289 ADVISE INDIVIDUALS OF THEIR RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE 31,

UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE (UCMJ) 57E283 TYPE CORRESPONDENCE 55E190 INITIATE AF FORMS 1169 (STATEMENT OF WITNESS) 55E189 COMPLETE AF FORMS 1168 54F291 APPREHEND SUBJECTS 54E187 INITIATE AF FORMS 1168 (STATEMENT OF SUSPECT) 54E175 INITIATE AF FORMS 52 (EVIDENCE TAG) 54E192 COMPLETE AF FORMS 1169 54A8 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 54B81 SUPERVISE LAW ENFORCEMENT SPECIALISTS (AFSC 81152) 53E191 ANNOTATE AF FORMS 1169 52F288 ADVISE INDIVIDUALS OF THEIR FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS 52F355 HANDCUFF SUBJECTS 51A36 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 480170 REVIEW TRAINING RECORDS, REPORTS, OR RELATED DATA 48G432 SEIZE EVIDENCE 47E260 INITIATE OR COMPLETE DD FORMS 1408 (ARMED FORCES TRAFFIC

TICKET) 470694 APPLY WEAPONS PRESERVATIVES OR LUBRICANTS 46C91 CONDUCT POST CHECKS 46A4 CONDUCT BRIEFINGS, OTHER THAN DISPATCH, DEPARTURE, POST

RELIEF, PATROL, PRISONER, OR FACILITY VISITOR BRIEFING 45E261 INITIATE OR COMPLETE DD FORMS 1569 (INCIDENT/COMPLAINT

REPORT) 450705 CLEAN WEAPON MECHANISMS OR PARTS 45A34 PLAN OR SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 44A5 COORDINATE SUPPORT WITH BASE SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 42A19 DEVELOP OR IMPROVE WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 41A2 ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 41C100 INTERROGATE SUSPECTS OR SUBJECTS 40B38 CONDUCT GUAROMOUNT 40


58

NCOs are responsible for supervision, it also reflects the range and scope ofthe job, in that relatively high percentages of the group are also performingsuch basic technical tasks as taking statements from suspects or witnesses,handcuffing subjects, and seizing evidence. Table 31 presents representativetasks which reflect the diffetences between DAFSC 81172 and the 9-skill leveland CEM Code groups.

Summary

Distinctions between the 811X2 skill level groups are evident, withpersonnel at the 3- and 5-skill levels spending the vast majority of theirtime performing tasks across a number of different jobs. At the 7-skilllevel, although members still spend over half of their relative duty time onnonsupervisory tasks, a shift toward supervisory functions is clear.

ANALYSIS OF 811X2 AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS

Survey data were compared to the AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions for theLaw Enforcement Specialist and Law Enforcement Supervisor, dated30 April 1991. Comments regarding the A-shred data analysis will be presentedin SECTION IV of the report. The Security Police Superintendent comparisonwas discussed in SECTION II, along with the 811X0 descriptions.

The specialty description for the Law Enforcement Supervisor accuratelyreflects the combined supervisory and technical nature of the 7-skill leveljob. The 3-/5-skill level description also accurately portrays the verytechnical nature of that job.

811X2 TRAINING ANALYSIS

Potential use of survey data in the development of training programs wasexplained in the discussion of the 811X0 career ladder in SECTION II. For the811X2 career ladder, technical school personnel from Lackland Training Centermatched job inventory tasks to appropriate sections and subsections of the STSand POI for course L3ABR81132-003/004. It was this matching upon whichcomparison to those documents was based. A complete computer listing display-ing the percent members performing tasks, TE and TD ratings for each task,along with the STS and POI matchings, has been forwarded to the technicalschool for their use in further detailed reviews of appropriate trainingdocuments. A summary of this information is presented below.


In this study, there are 695 AFSC 811X2 members in their first enlistment(1-48 months TAFMS), representing 12 percent of the total survey sample.Distribution of these personnel across the career ladder jobs is displayed inFigure 3, which clearly shows members dispersed across a number of the groups

59

'U

W 0=

Z OI-

:E c u 0 1.u Cc ~w w <

z o~ 20o Oz rz z 0

z EUI- W

1-00

-J c wz;cMA-L~U 3

L~uLL

Y-u

CO W1L)

0

0 L

1- O0 ~- ~ d z -'

V,4 a z4~

0N -4 C I44 I 0.No

ZO ' Z - O .

zIw- SL00z 44

0 1= ..

U)

60-J

identified in the SPECIALTY JOBS analysis, although the majority (79 percent)are involved in jobs associated with installation patrol and installationentry control. The job performed by these members is highly technical innature, with technical task performance accounting for approximately 96percent of their relative duty time (see Table 32). While Table 32 shows thatfirst-term airmen spend some of their job time in a variety of career ladderfunctional areas, the majority is concentrated on tasks pertaining to generallaw enforcement, individual weapons maintenance, ABGD operations, law enforce-ment operations, and traffic management or accident investigations, as well asperforming general administrative tasks. Table 33 displays some of theaverage 76 tasks performed by the group.

As previously stated, another of the objectives of this survey was togather data for the training center pertaining to weapons carried or utilized,security police tactics or procedures used or practiced, equipment used oroperated, as well as utilization of armed or unarmed physical apprehension andrestraint techniques (PART). Accordingly, Tables 34 through 39 presentpercentages of 811X2 first-term airmen responding to questions concerningtheir activities involving these items. This type of information is usefulfor both the technical school and MAJCOM training personnel to assist them infocusing limited training time or other resources on the most utilized itemsfor Law Enforcement personnel.


Training emphasis (TE) and task difficulty (TD) factors and AutomatedTraining Indicators (ATI) were discussed earlier in this report (see SURVEYMETHODOLOGY - Task Factor Administration; and 811X0 TRAINING ANALYSIS -Training Emphasis and Task Difficulty Data sections) explaining the utility ofthese additional bits of information. Technical tasks with the highest TEratings for 811X2 first-term airmen are presented in Table 40, while Table 41displays those tasks 811X2 raters judged to be most difficult to learn how todo.

Various lists of tasks, accompanied by TE and TD ratings, and whereappropriate, ATI values, are contained in the 811X2 TRAINING EXTRACT packageand should be reviewed in detail by technical school personnel.

Specialty Training Standard (STS)

A comprehensive review of STS 811X2/X2A, dated November 1988, compared811X2 STS items to survey data (based on the previously mentioned assistancefrom technical school personnel in matching job inventory tasks to STS ele-ments). STS paragraphs containing general knowledge information, mandatoryentries, subject-matter-knowledge-only requirements, or basic supervisoryresponsibilities were not examined. Paragraph 23, MILITARY WORKING DOG PRO-GRAM, pertains to A-shred personnel and was also not evaluated. This para-graph will be discussed along with other A-shred data in SECTION IV of thisreport. Task knowledge and performance elements of the STS were compared

61

TABLE 31

TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEENDAFSC 81172 AND 81199/CEM CODE PERSONNEL


DAFSCDAFSC 81199/81172 CEM CODE

TASKS (N=508) (N=118)- DIFF

F291 APPREHEND SUBJECTS 54 3 +51

E177 COMPLETE AF FORMS 52 51 1 +50

F335 HANDCUFF SUBJECTS 51 2+49

E190 INITIATE AF FORMS 1169 (STATEMENT OFWITNESS) 55 7 +48

E193 ADVISE INDIVIDUALS OF THEIR FIFTH AMENDMENTRIGHTS 52 8 +44

F339 INTERVIEW WITNESSES OR COMPLAINANTS 50 8 +42

G429 PERFORM TRAFFIC STOPS 41 0 +41

B39 CONDUCT STAFF MEETINGS 12 66 -54

C130 REVIEW INSPECTION REPORTS 25 75 -50

C125 INDORSE EPRs 24 70 -46

Al ADVISE STAFF PERSONNEL ON TRAININGMATTERS 41 76 -35

A5 COORDINATE SUPPORT WITH BASE SERVICEORGANIZATIONS 42 70 -28

C1O EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH WORK STANDARDS 29 55 -26

A2 ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 41 64 -23

62

TABLE 32

RELATIVE TIME SPENT ON DUTIESBY 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=695)

PERCENTDUTIES TIME SPENT


B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 1

C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING I

D TRAINING 1




H PERFORMING INFORMATION SECURITY, CRIME PREVENTION, ORRESOURCE PROTECTION TASKS 1

I MAINTAINING STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS SECURITY *

J PERFORMING BASE, WEAPONS STORAGE, OR AIRCRAFT SECURITYSYSTEMS TASKS 1

K PERFORMING DISASTER CONTROL TASKS 1

L PERFORMING DETENTION OR CONFINEMENT PROGRAM TASKS 2


N PERFORMING MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) OR PATROL HORSEPROGRAM TASKS *


P PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED EMERGENCY SERVICE TEAM (EST)OPERATIONS

Q PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED AIR BASE GROUND DEFENSE(ABGD) OPERATIONS 8

R PERFORMING TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS 3


63

TABLE 33

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMEDBY 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=695)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

E175 INITIATE AF FORMS 52 (EVIDENCE TAG) 75E190 INITIATE AF FORMS 1169 (STATEMENT OF WITNESS) 75E192 COMPLETE AF FORMS 1169 74E177 COMPLETE AF FORMS 52 73F344 FIRE WEAPONS TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION 72F342 ISSUE TRAFFIC TICKETS OR VIOLATION NOTICES 71E189 COMPLETE AF FORMS 1168 71F398 STANDARD GUARDMOUNT 700702 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M9 9MM OR M15 .38 CALIBER REVOLVERS 70E187 INITIATE AF FORMS 1168 (STATEMENT OF SUSPECT) 70F312 DIRECT TRAFFIC 68E260 INITIATE OR COMPLETE OD FORMS 1408 (ARMED FORCES TRAFFIC

TICKET) 68F343 ISSUE VISITOR PASSES 67F291 APPREHEND SUBJECTS 66F294 BRIEF POST RELIEFS 650695 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE GAU-5As OR M-16 RIFLES 65F378 RESPOND TO DURESS OR ALARM ACTIVATIONS 65F355 HANDCUFF SUBJECTS 65G429 PERFORM TRAFFIC STOPS 64F289 ADVISE INDIVIDUALS OF THEIR RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE 31,

UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE (UCMJ) 63E196 INITIATE AF FORMS 1668 (FIELD INTERVIEW) 63E204 INITIATE OR COMPLETE AF FORMS 75 (VISITOR/VEHICLE PASS

(STORAGE SAFEGUARD)) 62F376 PROVIDE DIRECTIONS OR INFORMATION TO VISITORS 59F300 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 59F288 ADVISE INDIVIDUALS OF THEIR FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS 58F339 INTERVIEW WITNESSES OR COMPLAINANTS 58F304 CONDUCT POV SIMPLE INSPECTIONS AT INSTALLATION ENTRY

POINTS 57F307 CONDUCT SUSPECT WALL SEARCHES, WITHOUT MWDs 54E264 INITIATE OR COMPLETE DO FORMS 1920 (ALCOHOLIC INFLUENCE

REPORT) 54F364 PERFORM ON-BASE MOBILE PATROLS, WITHOUT MWDs OR HORSES 50F355 OPERATE VEHICLE RADIOS OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS 48G433 VERIFY VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS 45


64

TABLE 34


USED DURING LAST 12 MONTHS (OTHER THAN TRAINING)BY 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=695)

PERCENTMEMBERSNUMBER OF TIMES USED RESPONDING*

DID NOT USE 84

1-3 TIMES 11

4-6 TIMES 2

7-9 TIMES 0

10 OR MORE TIMES 0


TABLE 35

NUMBER OF TIMES UNARMED PART USED DURINGLAST 12 MONTHS (QTHER THAN TRAINING)BY 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=695)

PERCENTMEMBERSNUMBER OF TIMES USED RESPONDING*

DID NOT USE 71

1-3 TIMES 21

4-6 TIMES 3

7-9 TIMES 0

10 OR MORE TIMES 2


65

TABLE 36

PRESENT ROLE IN ABGD FOR 811X2FIRST-JOB AND FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

PERCENTMEMBERS RESPONDING*

1-24 MOS 1-48 MOS1ST JOB 1ST ENL

ABGD ROLE TITLE (N=235) (N=695)

FIRE TEAM LEADER 0 2

FIRE TEAM MEMBER (NOT LEADER OR RADIO TELEPHONEOPERATOR) 60 55

FLIGHT COMMANDER 0 0

FLIGHT LEADER 0 0

FLIGHT SERGEANT 0 0

HEAVY WEAPONS GUN CREW MEMBER 8 5

MWD PATROL DOG HANDLER 0 0

MWD EXPLOSIVE DETECTOR DOG HANDLER 0 0

RADIO TELEPHONE OPERATOR (FT MBR) 2 3

RADIO TELEPHONE OPERATOR (HQS ELM) 0 1

SQUAD LEADER 1 1

DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN ABGD 27 29

OTHER 1 3

* Columns may not add to 100 percent due to nonresponse or rounding

66

TABLE 37

WEAPONS CARRIED OR UTILIZED BY 10 PERCENTOR MORE OF 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=695)

PERCENTMEMBERS

WEAPONS RESPONDING

M9 9MM HANDGUN 84

M16 RIFLE 61

MACE OR M36 16


M15 .38 REVOLVER 12

M870 SHOTGUN 12

M60 MACHINE GUN 12

POLICE CLUB 10

67

TABLE 38

SECURITY POLICE TACTICS OR PROCEDURESUSED OR PRACTICED BY 10 PERCENT OR MOREOF 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=695)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TACTICS OR PROCEDURES RESPONDING

HANDCUFFING 79TRAFFIC STOP 73INDIVIDUAL SEARCHES 70DURESS PROCEDURES 69VEHICLE SEARCHES 65VEHICLE STOP 65BUILDING SEARCHES 53RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 52COVER ANb CONCEALMENT 47HAND AND ARM SIGNALS 43CHALLENGE AND REPLY 38OPEN AREA SEARCHES 33HIGH CRAWL 28LOW CRAWL 28NBC PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT/CLOTHING 27CAMOUFLAGE 25NBC RECOGNITION 23NBC WARNINGS 23VEHICLE DEPLOYMENT 21NBC FIELD DECONTAMINATION 20RUSH AND ROLL 20BOUNDING OVERWATCH 18PERSONAL FIELD HYGIENE 18TRAVELING OVERWATCH 18COMBAT FIRST AID 15COMBAT PATROL 15FIRE AND MANEUVER 15OBSERVATION AND SOUND TECHNIQUES 15RECONNAISSANCE PATROL 15SECTOR DEFENSE 14TARGET RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION 13COUNTER AMBUSH 11FIELD FORTIFICATIONS 10

68

TABLE 39

EQUIPMENT USED OR OPERATED BY 10 PERCENTOR MORE OF 811X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=695)

PERCENTMEMBERS

EQUIPMENT RESPONDING

HANDCUFFS 82RADIO, HAND-HELD (NONTACTICAL) 73WEAPONS CLEANING EQUIPMENT 50RADAR SPEED MEASURING DEVICE 47BASE STATION WIRE 43TYPEWRITER 42GRID MAP 42GAS MASK 35FLEXCUFF 33HELMET, STEEL OR KEVLAR 33SPOTLIGHT OR OTHER ILLUMINATION DEVICE 31COMPUTER SYSTEM (OTHER THAN AFLETS) 28CB SCANNERS OR RADIO 27BODY ARMOR 26LOAD BEARING EQUIP (HARNESS, WEB BELT, AMMO POUCH) 26CAMOUFLAGE EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES, PERSONAL 25BREATHALYZER 24AFLETS 21FIRST AID EQUIP OR SUPPLIES (NON-NBC DECONTAM EQUIP) 21NIGHT OBSERVATION OR SIGHTING DEVICE (NOD) 21TRAFFIC TEMPLATE 21NBC CLOTHING 18WORD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT 17CAMERA 17VEHICLE OR PORTABLE PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM 17NBC PERSONAL DECONTAMINATION EQUIPMENT 14LAMINATING MACHINE 12ALCO-SENSOR 12ENTRENCHING TOOL 12CALCULATOR 11FIELD TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT (TA-i/PT; TA-312/PT) 11INTERIOR INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM 10FIELD GLASSES 10

69

(r% ci -lt C> ll C

e'~4 LLJ0I %0 CW) Lfl q~ c 0 LO -4 qd 0LO V) -i0 m. . a ~ u r%. r.. aO

0L

cr.L CA: mf 0 l (D 0 q& m 0~ M% q* Wcl o Dl-%Ill L -ir r- m %

C-,-

IL %4%0.oLE I-I

.2J L)J enI '

0L 2l LL

OD~ -i VA L1cc C)) I-Lu cc C (n La

4c 14 W U x

cC) cc Go O

0 3 U) INC'-ix i Lu) CC A.)

Q u C XC-) LL 0 1-. U- L- C) C

I- m ~ '-4 L '0CD W)D a

LL. %D) 0D U) C0 .4I -1 C 'w - -

< 0 CL) x- 0 0

uu U. J m CL) U. 0L L.tm C) Cc) 0%LU cc Lu- Lu 0L 03403 W) C)C 0 Q "C 0% tv4m. 0n 3t0 '. 00t PLu La 0 LaS- WU --- % ,-, wul1 LL I-- I- F- 4 yi C3U) S WC LuI mc L Lu Lu I.-Cr-C. L C) C3 u C- 0. 0. a- w )C,Lu X C.) W) "- e-4 LU 00A Lu 0 C..) I 0 0- 0 x C 0 m 302e w'-4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 >. u 2 C) C) U . I UC~ n " - 0D -l T YI e

0 co 0 ko C 00 0D 0D c M mULL '& U. LU w Lu u .- i LU L Lu

LUU. I I- I- h I hh- - -70 (J

CY~"-svs

-V4

(LOCC LL 1

U.I 4

CC CDo CT 0j at eq~ .-e vij M. q -4 -y "s V-

X )

LJLU

LL~1 -

LU ON ~ 4 C 0 0 0D 0D CD CA

%.0'I-N if - - - - I- . N

00 r D D U m e 4

LA-

~U)LU LU

LL-J

VCDv,4 L4C1

0L U) U U

ME the)I

LU *C UU)LU LU ME CIA

-A 1- 0C ME w aLL ME W) Got CC. cc 41-

<: V) LUC LU UC ME 09-CD 0 U XU CC ME cca =-i

oV 1za -J to cc CC W4 1 ~-40- 1- 0 LU 0u C U L o-

ad- ul) LU cc C.) LU CA)X. CX 01 CC In "CZLU

cc ME cc CAl s- CA LUcc CZ U- Z P- on my0

cc s- cc ME LU C c = U LU CwC- ac 04 '-4 W- CC Z- U cc cc

s- CAC c CA u c CUJ w M E E LU It to Cc 0UCD

U) ME U, ME CA cc no a. coa

0 01 0i 0 0 1--LU0I-- .. .J - W) cr 4A X: BIIIL U. LU LU LU LU LU. LU V) 0

uU =U so LU L U U L CLon X. 00 01 01 0C 0! LU 0 0CCU

ps cc cc jw jw to z ey 2 c4.

w- LU LL. c AC cc cc Qc cc a. MC C

71

against the standard set forth in AFR 8-13 (dated I August 1986) and AFR8-13/ATC Supplement I (dated 2 March 1987), Attachment 1, paragraph Ai-3c(4)(i.e., include tasks performed or knowledge required by 20 percent or more ofthe personnel in a skill level (criterion group) of the AFS).

Overall, the 811X2/X2A STS provides comprehensive coverage of the workperformed by personnel in this career ladder, with survey data supporting mostof the essential paragraphs or subparagraphs. Even though some elements didnot have high percentages of personnel performing matched tasks, the fact thatthe supporting tasks were a part of an identifiable job being performed in thecareer ladder supports the retention of the STS element involving these tasks.

Some few elements of the STS were not supported by occupational surveydata and do require review by training personnel and subject-matter experts.Table 42 displays these elements and survey data pertaining to tasks matchedto these elements. Even though some of the tasks shown reflect high TEratings, and some above average TO ratings as well, the low task performancefigures suggest evaluation to justify retention in the STS is warranted.

Tasks not matched to any element of the STS are listed at the end of theSTS computer listing. These were reviewed to determine if there were anytasks concentrated around any particular functions or jobs. No particulartrends were noted. Technical-type tasks performed by 20 percent or morerespondents of the STS target groups, but which were not referenced to any STSelement, are displayed in Table 43. Training personnel and subject-matterexperts should review these tasks to determine if inclusion in the STS isjustified.

Plan of Instruction (POI)

Based on the previously mentioned assistance from the technical schoolsubject-matter experts in matching inventory tasks to the 3ABR81132-003/004POI, dated 15 February 1991, a computer product was generated displaying theresults of the matching process. Information furnished for considerationincludes percent members performing data for first-job (1-24 months TAFMS) andfirst-enlistment (1-48 months TAFMS) personnel, as well as training emphasis(TE) and task difficulty (TD) ratings for individual tasks.

POI blocks, units of instruction, and criterion objectives were comparedagainst the standard set forth in Attachment 1, ATCR 52-22, dated17 February 1989 (30 percent or more of the criterion first-enlistment groupperforming tasks trained, along with sufficiently high TE and TO ratings onthose tasks). Per this guidance, tasks trained in the course which do notmeet these criteria must be considered for elimination from the formal course,if not justified on ome other acceptable basis.

Review of the tasks matched to the POI reveals that most POI units ofinstruction or criterion objectives are supported by OSR data (based onpercentages of 811X2 first-term airmen performing tasks, or high TE or TOratings for pertinent tasks), or appear to be teaching steps in the instruc-tion process. There are some units, however, which contain some objectives

72

m% Olt Rd c

C.c%j m

-44

u fe. r-. C14UJLL -4-cc ~-4

CD QU co

)

LL U- -

Q.LuJLu I I I I II cc

CD aL a" ar a e

I- LU 14 0 a aa

c-e C) ko.-. *a

LuV% C ) a C 2a

C)r Co) I en I #A I9- . I I I a *. I I c I~I I9-v I< I U ILA 1 4 a). I I L'L It a)l W-i ' - ~ a a

fK I cm-e 41 M~-' IC-4 I L-i I I I Ga I l CAI I

I I 19I I 4- L I 'UI I0 I <. I ~ u I ) I I ~ E ~ I I0LuJ I~u m0 V l IIC (I -

I- 10^ I' ICD) I~ 10 1. 4-) ~W) 1LL 99 i I CJ l)E 4JU I ) a nKU I to E~ to# - U'- l ~ U VNe -I- lLL. II en I. *r gD =IO . . , 0 1 0 00 . V Ia E

0010 1U '4- L)l U- c I4ulI- f< Lu 01 0a I IL 3 r_ .- ICDI cc06I) ILu I I I lI I 0. '4- I L I 0(A4)

I= I 'o I K a,1 V l-l 1 00 c v~ fe1no0CLuI +ZI .0- 0 I~ eJ I. c0 M. 4)LO I~ Col I~ ID I 4- CC LEcc n l-- . K Ee~ I ()I a#2-I I9- C IWI I) u~ cn0jN IW

9-- I (A 4J 2 4s0C a I I £ 0~0 4J~ r_ IW 0) I ~ CA-.) 1-1 L

LU I imIuL 1 4-fl En Iu I Lu 0 O I LuL I 0 a) m )Ia<I 4a 0 1~ 0 10.1 0. S. 1Il I/C tou I u I a I I I 1 0- 44 E1M 4U JLu I m I I II I I 1I A -r I 4 AcLI- a I Ic I 'a zf a I n I U e 0L .I r I I _r 1 % 0 1 I Oi0 =1%Al I I 4J I 3E I 4A) If I) 1 1 E I-L

0-4 l1 ) ..C I I* I LL I (1 4). U.C I = I LLI+- L391- ^ 1 1 V I1=01 0U- J, 1 u Iu1--In lia Ir. I00 cn I 4 L .0430 1lLJ1 1(v-1

-iI D II L L ( I cni73o c

co

>CQ I

<-4 I-4o o

o 0

U- C-) "~ CDE~

Oco 11-

LiC.)

CD~>- =A X:

Ii AI 0

cli LU I i Iar C) I- cc2t IxctLL Les 0 .Q

L O I I ~ U .

I~4 I-~ *L

LU A I I1-1 4A(I) Ii I a LI

-4 "0 II cc..J -S I l 0. 10. 0.EGD ci

E v, I I-I-Ei ol I E S-(

I- IA o <- I C'J co t7I I I c $-

LA I I U- I * I U..

CA I I 1

74

IL

enI m) m ) * C*ul CJ

LL -4u~l m' c'j C111 en<4c-4 I

cm C 00Z

0

Cj Lu LL-4 Iu l>C0 0. .C O4 _;0

oLA- Lu

0L r-. cn= n

I- C)) Lu

0 U uI

C)U <L < LJ

>-Lu -c) LLo Lu- LuW

LL 0 u < uC

-j Lu. Lu

CCLu =u LMZ- .40l < 0U -J -V V. ) Ln- U)I X C

CA cJ Pz cr 4-4m) C) -1c CD

:z) A Lu Lu Lu A\ LA-I- cr '-4 0

IL)C 06 LL ) L 4 U C9 m:z Lu 0 I= C) w ) :z

Lu Of 0 CD X .:4 1-4 0 -CC C) 0 ..jC-) C..J en4 cLu c

.o 0 C Lu C) CL) I 1C- 0 V

LU C) a cc ~ 0 mrW &Lu LL >- - 4U J U)< 0 Lu

04 I1- 0< Q- Lu U f Luj X:toC'Z2. 0-4 '-o EUJ C.J~ . ' D

4< L)... IC) I-C. I- 0 1. 0 u0-4 DE LuO CA. LLJ LuON-U

0 ZOJ a- cn)L (n V) ) fr'4LA

w . #-- 0. -< < CL a

~~c m~ Cj 0 0N-

C) A ) L CJ 1 0 0 0i uto< L U- 0-4 () 4W) CD ~ (\5II- - C3 "C. U.. U.. L. 0A 0 4Lu

< -4 X:LL i j75g

that apparently are not supported using these criteria and require furtherevaluation by training personnel and subject-matter experts (see examples inTable 44). While most of the selected sample tasks received high TE ratings(3.64 or above), all reflect less than 30 percent of the first-term populationperforming, and a number of them received below average TO ratings. Thecombination of low percent members performing and below average TO factorssuggests the need for close examination of pertinent objectives in these unitsof instruction to determine if the retention of over 24 hours in the ABRcourse is justified. It must be remembered that even though a task may havereceived a high TE rating, this need not dictate use of expensive, limited ABRcourse time. Low TO ratings for these same tasks suggest the possibility thattraining on these tasks could well be accomplished by OJT at those bases wherejobs using these tasks are performed.


Tasks and background data for personnel of the nine MAJCOMs with thelargest 811X2 populations were compared to determine whether job contentvaried as a function of command assignment.

Generally, the jobs performed across the commands were similar, with manytasks performed in common. The largest percentages of duty time in eachcommand were committed to the performance of tasks involving general lawenforcement, general administration functions, individual weapons maintenanceor armory tasks, and law enforcement operations (see Table 45). Minor vari-ances were noted, with PACAF personnel reporting slightly more time spent oncustoms tasks (Duty M). ATC personnel reported a notably higher percentage ofrelative duty time spent on detention and confinement program tasks (Duty L),while SAC airmen reported the least amount of time spent on tasks dealing withABGD (Duty Q).

SECTION IV

ANALYSIS OF 811XA DAFSC GROUPS

As explained in SECTION II, data pertaining to DAFSC groups are importantto the analysis of each career ladder. Since a comparison of duty and taskperformance between DAFSCs 81132A and 81152A indicated no substantial differ-ence in the jobs they perform, they will be discussed as a combined group inthis report. As previously indicated, DAFSC 81199 and CEM Code 81100 werealso combined for reporting purposes.

The distribution of A-shred skill-level groups across the career ladderjobs is displayed in Table 46, while Table 47 offers another perspective bydisplaying the relative percent time spent on each duty across the skill-level

76

W CI C ! C Id: 'I Ci 119 1 Ci C'ClJ

LU

zCD -

6- u O C C a % cm co.d .I qtCl~

LL 1- 0 (CC =U-

LUw I

U) V

LU3

Zl Jn LUJ-o0 -c 0 < I1(A4 ZE .1 -Z IW

w~L C I-0- zm wA< m -Z>C CEULUZ 0 LU X-

x4e- cm-L <- L1 (A YJ LUO1- ix 1-Z w- CD <L ) L 1= LULU ~ ~ ~ L IL << M:CD W-t <-U4

m 0 <O C L< W C0 >. C-)LU ix LUCU 0 VU) LU = D"4ZCD 0m 0 1Z 0 -= "U =) LU. en V2:JL 0> w0 U):0 ca L Z C-,c CD LU =< <- 001- C- 21d LUJ CD1- L

~~ZLU cm= :.. wM1-- 0O LU < 0LL C-A <LU< LU - n C 0 C3 =fl U)LI 3 CDb-iLIZ cn 0 .X~. M OW1 - (5 Ou 0<w -- -0L- 0 0u DZ M= 0um D-

(-n Cn 0 1-41- Cn V) tL > WD- LU WD >~Cn 0 - =w L. L.)LU ~0 0 C=)~ ZE 0 C L)CLU 0-- 01Z L LIIO -ccU OZ C0 I

CA. I- LU IL 1I WJ ) Li.ZLUJ >- X:>- =>- cr.j LUO L 30U >- = >- -4>-0 < C) 0LU0C =C C 4: C 0- r- c0 o W0 o CC c- -- 3- _j r-) j & U-.J9= =D u - = j 0-.. -j -11coLU 0.00.LU0 w .0 6-1 CILI u L t. V) Q. V) 0. c03C x) I.E-Z x U1Lw.V) LU<"C0 WE X *X<E X0L D LU LUJ LU l. ~ c) L> W) LU QOW LU 4

CLILUJ UlA ON m' 0D 004 YD %D a% Jt 0-0a'q 00-1. 40 -4 00 mi LAO 0) O -4 aOi.q-4 -C'.j -4LU q en r" I- ew) q U) mA ( I) en)~ en ) eno0CCA L-U -0' 0' c LL LL -lcLL U -U- LL UL -000

00UL)LL.

cn

CUo LU ew) C0 C 0C

LU E

CCEO

LU LU . D C'0

'00

:1-0)LUU) .0 U t

LUL

0 o-

77

N i

w1 ~ a, on It P4 a 1 4 w3 a q It tE N

m~ eA~ ai. .n 4 0 * 0 N 3 dD X to N

*I a An-S t em U in 0b x 'd- 4 4 4I 0 o

N on 14n

q4 m N pmi 4 4 39 N 3

z

1-4I--

In I-

IL (A- -

1.- 89 i 0 1.U zz

m0 4#

zz

Uw to 02U. 4 zz w

N z = 4

t4) - OW t- " ,0-4 CA Z04 M ~ U .1 6;M 140 opNW 94 p aq P"-,Z~

~~N p 40 D.- ~ p

m 4U W4 uw 000 3 0 0 0 in 4 0 maa-

w~~~a : -M t m N-k.

78

Cl C C D D C C DC)q 0 0C a DCDC .0r4r- c

4M1 00 0 0 0 0 0 U 00 0-4 InWc

W0 t

V)0 0-ILL L) J

LUJ0- u CJr 0

LUILL o D% c l4D L C lCDC liC D l 4 DC) C ) D 0

I- (f I-.4

Ln

CD)

CL) C'j0CD - C0C C. 0>00CD-400 0 0 000 CDU )(DC D C)C )

-4 L U

LU C.)-"0I I=

LU 00 -4e) DJ

-< 00-

>--L

LL - 0(

LA- cc U

CD CLb- gc C

V) I-- ZC. V.) 2 >c-Go 0 C-) 0-0^ - L0-4 u d== cUiLJ L 0 LU '- D

0C) = m rL mD- 0 (1=CL 4c4 -M d CD QI- LU( LJ I-cn >

0t0- 0 5 0 "C '-'L cf 0

'-) cc cc C3 =DCd0)cCl 0 - - a 0- = U LU = 4 LU 0L

0- = 39 -- LU U 0 = LU-U C.n >- XDf CW W 4L> LU v-4>-

X: >-0 0 = 0 -00 I~ - W LLLJ X - bCf-4. LQ n m

LUW -4 LlU " zi. 4W-<-4 1lU) ~ ~ =1 .).Jb- :L)L I INC. >I I

1931.4-~)- 0C~C'4 )~

0 L C.) U)( ~0--.4E079U

TABLE 47

AVERAGE PERCENT TIME SPENT PERFORMING DUTIES BY 811X2A DAFSC GROUPS

DAFSC DAFSC81132A/ DAFSC 81199/81152A 81172A CEM CODE

DUTIES (N=189) (N=64) (N=118_'

A PLANNING AND ORGANIZING 1 7 25

B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 1 7 21

C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING 2 8 30

D TRAINING 1 6 3

E PERFORMING GENERAL ADMINISTRATION TASKS 18 14 6

F PERFORMING GENERAL SECURITY OR LAW ENFORCEMENT(LE) TASKS 19 10 5

G PERFORMING LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS TASKS 2 2 1

H PERFORMING INFORMATION, SECURITY, CRIMEPREVENTION, OR RESOURCE PROTECTION TASKS * * 3

I MAINTAINING STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS SECURITY 0 0 *

J PERFORMING BASE, WEAPONS STORAGE, OR AIRCRAFTSECURITY SYSTEMS TASKS * * *

K PERFORMING DISASTER CONTROL TASKS * 1 1

L PERFORMING DETENTION OR CONFINEMENT PROGRAMTASKS * * *

M PERFORMING CUSTOMS TASKS * *

N PERFORMING MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) ORPATROL HORSE PROGRAM TASKS 45 37

0 PERFORMING INDIVIDUAL WEAPONS MAINTENANCEOR ARMORY TASKS 4 2 2

P PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED EMERGENCYSERVICE TEAM (EST) OPERATIONS *

Q PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED AIR BASEGROUND (ABGD) OPERATIONS 3 3 3

R PERFORMING TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OR ACCIDENTINVESTIGATIONS 2 1


80

groups. A typical pattern of progression is present, with personnel spendingmore of their relative time on duties involving supervisory, managerial, andtraining tasks as they move upward toward the 7-skill level, the 9-skilllevel, or the CEM Code.


DAFSCs 81132A/81152A. The 189 airmen in the 3- and 5-skill level group,representing 75 percent of the A-shred sample, performed an average of 98tasks. Members of this group are represented in only five of the jobs identi-fied iri the SPECIALTY JOBS analysis (see Table 46), and 82 percent of thesepersonnel are concentrated in only two of those jobs (MWD HANDLING CLUSTER andMWD TRAINING). Performing a highly technical job, 66 percent of their rela-tive duty time is devoted to tasks pertaining to the military working dog(MWD) program, general law enforcement (LE), and LE operations. An additional18 percent of their relative duty time was committed to tasks associated withadministrative procedures and forms pertaining to law enforcement and MWDoperations. Table 48 displays selected representative tasks performed by thehighest percentages of these airmen. Table 49 displays those tasks whichclearly differentiate the 3-/5-skill level and the 7-skill level groups.

DAFSC 81172A. These 64 seven-skill level NCOs (25 percent of the A-shredsample) perform a job which is primarily supervisory and managerial in nature.With 77 percent reporting supervisory responsibilities, group members spend 42percent of their relative job time on duties involving the performance ofsupervisory, managerial, personnel training, and administrative tasks. Anadditional 37 percent of their duty time is devoted to tasks pertaining to themilitary working dog (MWD) program. The majority of the time spent on MWDactivities involves evaluating dogs and dog handlers; providing training (bothinitial and proficiency) to individual dogs, handlers, and MWD teams; andsupervising the overall care of the dogs and kennels (see Table 50 for repre-sentative tasks). Group members have a relatively broad job, performing anaverage of 108 tasks, with 76 tasks accounting for over 50 percent of theirjob time.

Summary

Distinctions between the 811X2A skill level groups are evident, withpersonnel at the 3- and 5-skill levels spending the vast majority of theirtime performing technical law enforcement and MWD handling tasks, while at the7-skill level, supervisory, managerial, personnel training, and dog handlingtraining functions become the more dominant aspects of the job. Nine-skilllevel and CEM Code personnel perform a predominantly staff-oriented job withvery little activity involving A-shred peculiar tasks (see Tables 10 and 51).

81

TABLE 48

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMEDBY 81132A/81152A PERSONNEL

(N=189)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

N592 ADMINISTER PRESCRIBED MEDICATIONS TO DOGS 84N651 FEED OR WATER DOGS 83N663 MAINTAIN MWD KENNELS OR KENNEL AREAS 83N649 EXERCISE OR GROOM MWDs 81N662 MAINTAIN MWD HANDLING EQUIPMENT 78N664 MAINTAIN MWD TRAINING AND UTILIZATION RECORDS OR CHARTS 77N635 EMPLOY MWD PRINCIPLES OF CONDITIONING 76N658 INSPECT MWD HEALTH CHECK POINTS 73E192 COMPLETE AF FORMS 1169 71N689 TRAIN MWDs IN ON OR OFF LEASH OBEDIENCE 68E190 INITIATE AF FORMS 1169 (STATEMENT OF WITNESS) 67N687 TAKE MWDs TO SICK-CALL 66E181 INITIATE AF FORMS 321 (MILITARY WORKING DOG TRAINING AND

UTILIZATION RECORD) 66E187 INITIATE AF FORMS 1168 (STATEMENT OF SUSPECT) 64F378 RESPOND TO DURESS OR ALARM ACTIVATIONS 630702 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M9 9MM OR M15 .38 CALIBER REVOLVERS 63F398 STAND GUARDMOUNT 63F300 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 61E175 INITIATE AF FORMS 52 (EVIDENCE TAG) 61F342 ISSUE TRAFFIC TICKETS OR VIOLATION NOTICES 60G429 PERFORM TRAFFIC STOPS 59N670 PATROL POSTS ON FOOT WITH MWDs 590695 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE GAU-5As OR M-16 RIFLES 59N680 SEARCH BUILDINGS FOR PERSONNEL WITH MWDs 58N669 PATROL POSTS IN VEHICLES WITH MWDs 580705 CLEAN WEAPON MECHANISMS OR PARTS 58N691 TRAIN MWDs TO TOLERATE CROWDS, INDIVIDUALS, OR OTHER DOGS 57N690 TRAIN MWDs TO RIDE IN VEHICLES 56N596 ASSESS MWD PROFICIENCY TRAINING NEEDS 56F339 INTERVIEW WITNESSES OR COMPLAINANTS 520694 APPLY WEAPONS PRESERVATIVES OR LUBRICANTS 51N674 PREPARE PRESCRIBED MWD DIETS 50


82

TABLE 49

TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEENDAFSCs 81132A/81152A AND 81172A PERSONNEL


DAFSC DAFSC81132A/81152A 81172A

TASKS (N=189) (N=64) DIFF


E260 INITIATE OR COMPLETE DD FORMS 1408(ARMED FORCES TRAFFIC TICKET) 61 27 +34

F300 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 61 27 +34

N669 PATROL POSTS IN VEHICLES WITH MWDs 58 30 +28

N680 SEARCH BUILDINGS FOR PERSONNEL WITH MWDs 58 31 +27

N658 INSPECT MWD HEALTH CHECK POINTS 73 52 +21


N644 EVALUATE MWD CAPABILITIES 21 67 -46

A34 PLAN OR SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 5 45 -40

N660 INVENTORY MWD DRUG TRAINING AIDS 18 56 -38

N693 WRITE MWD QUARTERLY SUMMARY REPORTS 15 50 -35

D145 CONDUCT OJT 17 52 -35

N648 EVALUATE POTENTIAL MWDs 14 45 -31

83

TABLE 50

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY 81172A PERSONNEL(N=64)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

C126 INSPECT MWD KENNELS, TRAINING AREAS, OR SUPPORT FACILITIES 72N664 MAINTAIN MWD TRAINING AND UTILIZATION RECORDS OR CHARTS 72N596 ASSESS MWD PROFICIENCY TRAINING NEEDS 70C135 WRITE EPRs 70C110 EVALUATE MWD TEAM UTILIZATION 69N663 MAINTAIN MWD KENNELS OR KENNEL AREAS 69D170 REVIEW TRAINING RECORDS, REPORTS, OR RELATED DATA 67N644 EVALUATE MWD TEAM CAPABILITIES 67N636 EMPLOY MWD SAFETY PROCEDURES 67B40 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY RELATED MATTERS 67N672 PERFORM AS AGITATOR OR DECOY IN CONTROLLED AGGRESSION

TRAINING 67N642 EVALUATE MWD CAPABILITIES 66N651 FEEC OR WATER MWDs 66N635 EMPLOY MWD PRINCIPLES OF CONDITIONING 64N608 CONDUCT MWD TEAM BUILDING SEARCH PROFICIENCY TRAINING 64Al ADVISE STAFF PERSONNEL ON TRAINING MATTERS 64N592 ADMINISTER PRESCRIBED MEDICATIONS TO DOGS 64N594 ADVISE ON-SCENE COMMANDERS ON MWD UTILIZATION, FOR OTHER

THAN ABGD 63N662 MAINTAIN MWD HANDLING EQUIPMENT 61N643 EVALUATE MWD OR DOG HANDLER EQUIPMENT NEEDS 61N688 TRAIN MWD TEAMS TO PERFORM DUTIES WHILE EXPOSED TO GUNFIRE 61N661 INVENTORY MWD EXPLOSIVE TRAINING AIDS 590694 APPLY WEAPONS PRESERVATIVES OR LUBRICANTS 59B53 DIRECT MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) PROGRAMS 59N606 CONDUCT MWD EXPLOSIVES DETECTOR PROFICIENCY TRAINING 58B88 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 56N660 INVENTORY MWD DRUG TRAINING AIDS 56N600 CONDUCT MWD BASE CERTIFICATIONS 55N653 IDENTIFY MWD BEHAVIOR CHANGES 55N676 PROCURE OR MAINTAIN EXPLOSIVE DETECTION TRAINING AIDS 53E181 INITIATE AF FORMS 321 (MWD TRAINING AND UTILIZATION

RECORD) 52N605 CONDUCT MWD DETECTOR DOG QUARTERLY VALIDATIONS 520145 CONDUCT OJT 52N644 IDENTIFY MWDs FOR TREATMENT OR DISPOSAL 50


84

ANALYSIS OF 811X2A AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS

Survey data pertinent to the A-shred of AFSC 811X2 (Military Working DogQualified) were compared to the AFR 39-1 Specialty Description for the LawEnforcement Specialist and Law Enforcement Supervisor, dated 30 April 1991.

The Law Enforcement Specialist description, as it pertains to the A-shredfunction, is very accurate in depicting the 3-/5-skill level job involvingmilitary working dog (MWD) handling.

The description for the Law Enforcement Supervisor, as it pertains to theA-shred member, requires adjustment. Although the responsibility for super-vision of the MWD program is mentioned in Paragraph 1, SPECIALTY SUMMARY,there is no reference to the MWD program in Paragraph 2, DUTIES AND RESPONSI-BILITIES. Since MWD program tasks account for a significant portion of theA-shred 7-skill level NCO's job time, addition of a subparagraph covering thisfunction (as is provided in the Law Enforcement Specialist description) isappropriate. This deficiency was also noted in the 1984 OSR.

811X2A TRAINING ANALYSIS

Potential use of survey data in the development of training programs wasexplained in the discussion of the 811X0 career ladder in SECTION II. AFSC811X2 A-shred incumbents are selected from qualified 811X2 career ladderpersonnel; therefore, this training analysis will evaluate only those STSelements pertaining to MWD activities. For the A-shred functions, technicalschool personnel from Lackland Training Center matched inventory tasks toappropriate sections of the STS (paragraph 23) and the P0I for CourseL3ALR81132A-OO1/4AST81132A-O01, Patrol Dog Handler. It was this matching uponwhich comparison to these documents was based. A complete computer listingdisplaying the percent members performing tasks, TE and TD ratings for eachtask, along with the STS and POI matchings, has been forwarded to the techni-cal school for their use in further detailed reviews of appropriate trainingdocuments. A summary of this information is presented below.


In this study, there are 117 AFSC 811X2A members in their firstenlistment (1-48 months TAFMS), representing 46 percent of the A-shred sample.These airmen spent the vast majority of their relative duty time (85 percent)performing tasks involving handling military working dogs, performing generallaw enforcement duties (such as installation patrol and traffic control),forms preparation, and other administrative tasks associated with theseactivities (see Table 52). An additional 4 percent of their relative dutytime was devoted to performance of individual weapons maintenance or armory

85

TABLE 51

TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEENDAFSCs 81172A AND 81199/CEM CODE PERSONNEL


DAFSCDAFSC 81199/81172A CEM CODE

TASKS (N=64) (N=118) DIFFN644 MAINTAIN MWD TRAINING AND UTILIZATION

RECORDS OR CHARTS 72 0 +72

N596 ASSESS MWD PROFICIENCY TRAINING NEEDS 70 3 +67

N644 EVALUATE MWD TEAM CAPABILITIES 67 1 +66

N643 EVALUATE MWD OR DOG HANDLER EQUIPMENT NEEDS 61 1 +60


B53 DIRECT MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) PROGRAMS 59 11 +48

0145 CONDUCT OJT 52 17 +35

B' CONDUCT STAFF MEETINGS 9 66 -57

C89 ANALYZE INSPECTION REPORTS 19 71 -52

C125 INDORSE ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORTS (EPRs) 22 70 -48

A37 WRITE JOB DESCRIPTIONS 23 66 -43

B71 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES 23 58 -35

A19 DEVELOP OR IMPROVE WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 42 72 -30

C124 EVALUATE WORK SCHEDULES 23 51 -28

86

TABLE 52

RELATIVE TIME SPENT ON DUTIESBY 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=117)

PERCENTDUTIES TIME SPENT


B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING *

C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING I

D TRAINING 1




H PERFORMING INFORMATION SECURITY, CRIME PREVENTION, ORRESOURCE PROTECTION TASKS *

I MAINTAINING STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS SECURITY 0

J PERFORMING BASE, WEAPONS STORAGE, OR AIRCRAFT SECURITYSYSTEMS TASKS *

K PERFORMING DISASTER CONTROL TASKS *

L PERFORMING DETENTION OR CONFINEMENT PROGRAM TASKS *


N PERFORMING MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) OR PATROL HORSEPROGRAM TASKS 49


P PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED EMERGENCY SERVICE TEAM (EST)OPERATIONS *

Q PERFORMING ACTUAL OR SIMULATED AIR BASE GROUND DEFENSE (ABGD)OPERATIONS 3

R PERFORMING TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS 2

• Less than .5 percent

87

tasks. Distribution of these personnel in the career ladder jobs is displayedin Figure 4, reflecting the fact that the highest percentage of A-shredfirst-term airmen (84 percent) is involved in jobs associated with MWD han-dling and MWD training. Table 53 displays some of the average 86 tasksperformed by the group.

As previously stated, another of the objectives of this survey was togather data for the training center pertaining to weapons carried or utilized,security police tactics or procedures used or practiced, equipment used oroperated, as well as utilization of armed or unarmed physical apprehension andrestraint techniques (PART). Accordingly, Tables 54 through 59 presentpercentages of 811X2A first-term airmen responding to questions concerningtheir activities involving these items. This type of information is usefulfor both the technical school and MAJCOM training personnel to assist them infocusing limited training time or other resources on the most utilized itemsfor A-shred personnel.


Training emphasis (TE) and task difficulty (TD) factors and AutomatedTraining Indicators (ATI) were discussed earlier in this report (see SURVEYMETHODOLOGY - Task Factor Administration; and 811X0 TRAINING ANALYSIS -Training Emphasis and Task Difficulty Data sections) explaining the utility ofthese additional bits of information. Technical tasks with the highest TEratings for 811X2A first-term airmen are presented in Table 60, while Table 61displays those tasks 811X2A raters judged to be most difficult to learn how todo.

Various lists of tasks, accompanied by TE and TD ratings, and whereappropriate, ATI values, are contained in the 811X2A TRAINING EXTRACT packageand should be reviewed in detail by technical school personnel.

Paragraph 23, Specialty Training Standard (STS)

A comprehensive review of paragraph 23, MILITARY WORKING DOG PROGRAM(peculiar to A-shred personnel), STS 811X2/X2A, dated November 1988, comparedSTS items to survey data (based on the previously mentioned assistance fromtechnical school personnel in matching job inventory tasks to STS elements).STS subparagraphs containing general knowledge information or subject-matter-knowledge-only requirements were not examined.

Per standards set forth in AFR 8-13 (previously described), the elementsof the MILITARY WORKING DOG PROGRAM portion of the STS are well supported bysurvey data, and no problems or deficiencies were noted.

Plan of Instruction (POID

Based on the assistance from the technical school subject-matter-expertsin matching inventory tasks to the 3ALR81132A-OO1/4AST81132A-O01 POI, dated22 August 1990, a computer product was generated displaying the results of the

88

cc 0

i01 h

00

- C-ca 0

w z1z >

0.

)CI

CU

0z

U)

00

UC)

z

0 89

TABLE 53

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMEDBY 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=117)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

N663 MAINTAIN MWD KENNELS OR KENNEL AREAS 87N651 FEED OR WATER DOGS 85N649 EXERCISE OR GROOM MWDs 85N592 ADMINISTER PRESCRIBED MEDICATIONS TO DOGS 82N662 MAINTAIN MWD HANDLING EQUIPMENT 81N664 MAINTAIN MWD TRAINING AND UTILIZATION RECORDS OR CHARTS 80N658 INSPECT MWD HEALTH CHECK POINTS 77N636 EMPLOY MWD SAFETY PROCEDURES 74E183 COMPLETE AF FORMS 321 69E189 COMPLETE AF FORMS 1168 69N672 PERFORM AS AGITATOR OR DECOY IN CONTROLLED AGGRESSION

TRAINING 68E192 COMPLETE AF FORMS 1169 68E181 INITIATE AF FORMS 321 (MILITARY WORKING DOG TRAINING AND

UTILIZATION RECORD) 67N689 TRAIN MWDs IN ON OR OFF LEASH OBEDIENCE 66E182 ANNOTATE AF FORMS 321 66E191 ANNOTATE AF FORMS 1169 65E190 INITIATE AF FORMS 1169 (STATEMENT OF WITNESS) 63E188 ANNOTATE AF FORMS 1168 63N687 TAKE MWDs TO SICK-CALL 62N680 SEARCH BUILDINGS FOR PERSONNEL WITH MWDs 62N670 PATROL POSTS ON FOOT WITH MWDs 62F300 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 620705 CLEAN WEAPON MECHANISMS OR PARTS 62N669 PATROL POSTS IN VEHICLES WITH MWDs 61N608 CONDUCT MWD TEAM BUILDING SEARCH PROFICIENCY TRAINING 610702 ASSEMBLE OR DISASSEMBLE M9 9MM OR M15 .38 CALIBER

REVOLVERS 61E187 INITIATE AF FORMS 1168 (STATEMENT OF SUSPECT) 61F398 STAND GUAROMOUNT 60N604 CONDUCT MWD CARE AND HANDLING PROFICIENCY TRAINING 60F378 RESPOND TO DURESS OR ALARM ACTIVATIONS 60N653 IDENTIFY MWD BEHAVIOR CHANGES 59G429 PERFORM TRAFFIC STOPS 57


90

TABLE 54


USED DURING LAST 12 MONTHS (OTHER THAN TRAINING)BY 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=117)

PERCENTMEMBERS


DID NOT USE 901-3 TIMES 74-6 TIMES 37-9 TIMES 010 OR MORE TIMES 1


TABLE 55

NUMBER OF TIMES UNARMED PART USED DURINGLAST 12 MONTHS (OTHER THAN TRAINING)BY 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=117)

PERCENTMEMBERS


DID NOT USE 791-3 TIMES 154-6 TIMES 37-9 TIMES 110 OR MORE TIMES 3


91

-"O7 .

TABLE 56

PRESENT ROLE IN ABGD FOR 811X2AFIRST-JOB AND FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

PERCENTMEMBERS RESPONDING

1-24 MOS 1-48 MOS1ST JOB IST ENL

ABGD ROLE TITLE (N=43) (N=117)

FIRE TEAM LEADER 0 0

FIRE TEAM MEMBER (NOT LEADER OR RADIO TELEPHONEOPERATOR) 14 9

FLIGHT COMMANDER 0 0

FLIGHT LEADER 0 0

FLIGHT SERGEANT 0 0

HEAVY WEAPONS GUN CREW MEMBER 0 0

MWD PATROL DOG HANDLER 28 42

MWD EXPLOSIVE DETECTOR DOG HANDLER 12 18

RADIO TELEPHONE OPERATOR (FT MBR) 2 1

RADIO TELEPHONE OPERATOR (HQS ELM) 0 1

SQUAD LEADER 0 0

DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN ABGD 42 28

OTHER 2 1

92

TABLE 57

WEAPONS CARRIED OR UTILIZED BY 10 PERCENTOR MORE OF 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=117)

PERCENTWEAPONS MEMBERS

WEAPONSRESPONDING

M9 9MM HANDGUN 70

GAU-5A 36

M16 RIFLE 34

M15 .38 REVOLVER 13

93

TABLE 58

SECURITY POLICE TACTICS OR PROCEDURESUSED OR PRACTICED BY 10 PERCENT OR MOREOF 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=117)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TACTICS OR PROCEDURES RESPONDING

MILITARY WORKING DOG PROTOCOL TRAINING 74HANDCUFFING 67TRAFFIC STOP 66BUILDING SEARCHES 64VEHICLE SEARCHES 61INDIVIDUAL SEARCHES 60OPEN AREA SERCHES 58DURESS PROCEDURES 56VEHICLE STOP 55RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 44COVER AND CONCEALMENT 43CHALLENGE AND REPLAY 38HAND AND ARM SIGNAL 37HIGH CRAWL 30LOW CRAWL 29CAMOUFLAGE 26NBC PERSONAL PROTECTION EQP/CLOTHING 25VEHICLE DEPLOYMENT 23NBC RECOGNITION 22NBC WARNINGS 22PERSONAL FIELD HYGIENE 21BUILT UP AREA SEARCHES 20COMBAT PATROL 19RUSH AND ROLL 19FIRE AND MANEUVER 16NBC FIELD DECONTAMINATION 16COMBAT FIRST AID 15OBSERVATION AND SOUND TECHNIQUES 15RECONNAISSANCE PATROL 15SECTOR DEFENSE 15TRAVELING OVERWATCH 15BOUNDING OVERWATCH 13COUNTER AMBUSH 12

94

TABLE 59

EQUIPMENT USED OR OPERATED BY 10 PERCENTOR MORE OF 811X2A FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL

(N=117)

PERCENTMEMBERS

EQUIPMENT RESPONDING

DOG HANDLER GEAR 91HANDCUFFS 69RADIO, HAND-HELD (NONTACTICAL) 68WEAPONS CLEANING EQUIPMENT 52DRUG TRAINING AID 44TYPEWRITER 43RADAR SPEED MEASURING DEVICE 41FLEXCUFF 37GAS MASK 37HELMET, STEEL OR KEVLAR 34EXPLOSIVE TRAINING AID 32GRID MAP 32SPOTLIGHT OR OTHER ILLUMINATION DEVICE 30LOAD BEARING EQUIPMENT (HARNESS, WEB BELT, AMMO POUCH) 26FIRST AID EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES (NOT NBC DECONTAM EQUIP) 25CB SCANNERS OR RADIO 25CAMOUFLAGE EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES, PERSONAL 25BODY ARMOR 23VEHICLE OR PORTABLE PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM 21NIGHT OBSERVATION OR SIGHTING DEVICE (NOD) 19TRAFFIC TEMPLATE 18BREATHALYZER 18BASE STATION WIRE 17NBC CLOTHING 17WORD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT 16BACK OR BUTT PACK 16CAMOUFLAGE EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES, UNIT 14COMPUTER SYSTEM (OTHER THAN AFLETS) 14DRUG TEST KIT 13CALCULATOR 12NBC PERSONAL DECONTAMINATION EQUIPMENT 11ENTRENCHING TOOL 11ALCO-SENSOR 10

95

It I0C % 00 *~ CDq .. m) W* 0- t

< Pfl Go Llf Go mo .n %D) m it%

"C 4 LLU u~ W-4 qw C4J q~ co r% .qd) r mC.jZ x% %0 o . t C%j Ur) U) Ur) e~j

-oLUA

LL w -e 0~t 0 0D W) %c Wo -c 0

LUI m P- a) d. w *)

"C cv

LP II

LLLU

"C- - .. L

L--

"CCL9-I CV) $A L

U) (n 03LU< LUJ %A U) LU ....

m CJ C C3 LU J -CD~ 1= J 0o

LUJ>- LU 3 X >O0 .- 1 3 LU 0

C3 -om IC

I- U) -g CD cc:

$'C 1- LU 0ccUmC Q) =3 co )- .- 'a

LU C) 0 0 ) -iJ

m- LL 0I- -) 0 L- 0 EU

ui 0 a LA- CC 0. C z '41= LU LU 0 C) 0A 0 - X)

LU UU C-) 0.. Ut-. 03 U) 0L U.3 c- 06-~~~~~LU LL LD LU6 0i LU C:

(3 0 . 40 a.. LL 0) -4 C '

U. 06 0 LA-. LU U) 0-LU > -4j -j .- I V) SA(M 4A =Do- " U 0. <C 0M.-w LU co I- C9 I= x aj -LU La- 2c 2c a4 Q 0 0 0X: <C $- C9 I-- qa W 0- 41 cLUI V) 03 0. -C 03 C3 =l LU kE'-

-i '-4 0 r- 4-)-.: a W) -'~ 0 Q cl to

i- > Z>-~ ' <" LUxZ C) 0 C-P -4 U) L) 9-4

- cJ z . LL. 1= <C - 4- q-

Z0cx ~ a. < a. <C a.000<D)j zLUJZ u LU WW EUimLU&

.4c LU U)n LU 06 V)) c^ - "ic 4n EL

at el 00 '0) r4% r 00 to 00 00"C %a %a tO o %D to %D C% C4 %Do 4

0-~u Z. m is Z ZL L.

96

(m 00 d mY C> V)D LA m~ %D LO CV) 4

U

0 -CI

LuI

0o " 00u - - ~LuJ

I.-Lcm

C-)

LuJ

C3

-JLCD C0 4D Co () (D O Cl Cl

Go %DG -'m Onm " LA nU- N C LiC CLA- -i co P, r.~ - r*' - i. -

o--4 UCD

Lu U

UJ -J

CD I

o U

V) I= V)x 1(D X: LuU)0 .1 x ) .

u a. 0 < aI-- 0C < J U

U.1 u . 46 Or

z~~~ )<- .1 U

o o i- z *c RAa. w. U. w - C C. .1 W)

L" U. l' X u Lu Lu U)u cnU 0 -1 < 0 Lu C>CD -J X gn M )

cc ..J .. u a. t) lo" a. 0 w Ju La.~U _ C Lu I O.

-' >- I- C a M. -

C3 1, - - 0 0 0C3 m 0 0~C Lu to V) LA. LL~~ Zo 0 0 C u1 U-O I

a. V) a. z C. a. co a. a. a. W)o o 1= 0 0 0 0 0 -1 C3-. Lu .1 - 0 ..J -. 1 -1 -1 .j U.1U 10- u U- Lu u LA U Lu u I-Cu U. Lu 1 Lu 1 u Lu Lu Lu Lu = CDa 3t 0 m In 03 0 lm 1= 03 3

P'- O *ld %0 CO 0l %Q Ln g0)' - C'~j -4 (Y) "-1 1-4 cJ at C4 -4 ".4I.< .4c "u ' . ' C ' C <C .4c u

97

matching process. Information furnished for consideration includes percentmembers performing data for first-job (1-24 months TAFMS) and first-enlistment(1-48 months TAFMS) personnel, as well as TE and TO ratings for individualtasks.

POI units of instruction and criterion objectives were evaluated usingpreviously discussed standards in ATCR 52-22. All but one of the criterionobjectives are strongly supported by survey data based on percentages offirst-term personnel performing significant dog handling-related tasks or thehigh TE ratings for some tasks. Only Unit 7b (4 hours) (pertaining to "track-ing") reflected tasks taught with less than 30 percent of first-term A-shredpersonnel performing the tasks. Training personnel and subject-matter expertsshould review this portion of the POI to determine if retention of thistraining is justified.


Tasks and background data for the six MAJCOMs with the largest 811X2Apopulations were compared to determine whether job content varied as a func-tion of command assignment.

By far the largest percentage of relative job time in each MAJCOM isdevoted to the performance of tasks involving handling and working with dogs(see Duty N, Table 62). Although there is some variance across commands inthe amount of time spent on MWD program tasks, review of the specific tasksand combination of tasks reveals that there is little real variation in thejobs performed. Two minor variances noted when reviewing Table 62 are thelower percentages of time spent on duties involving general administration andgeneral law enforcement tasks (Duties E and F) by ATC personnel. Thesevariances do not signify a significant difference in job content acrosscommands.

SECTION V

JOB SATISFACTION ANALYSIS

An examination of the job satisfaction indicators of various groups cangive career ladder managers a better understanding of some of the factorswhich may affect the job performance of airmen in the career ladder. Attitudequestions covering job interest, perceived utilization of talents and train-ing, sense of accomplishment from work, and reenlistment intentions wereincluded in the survey booklet to provide indications of job satisfaction.Tables 63, 64, and 65 present job satisfaction data for AFSC 811X0, 811X2, and811X2A TAFMS groups (respectively), together with data for a comparativesample of other Direct Support career ladders surveyed in 1991. These data

98

U v~.~() mYC% *d 0~ m co m C.JcCoW C " C

u e %J qc J1ir. 0 "% -k 4 it r-I4c -4 CMj m~ V-4 C-i c.j

U. cli en C~j-4 1-4 W itC ORL qc at w m

CDJ < j CV)

L)

L(f C%i C'CI -4Ci cl 0D %0 -4i 4' L) 4(- 4c -d' rO

e% ~ eJ1

0

t- i

-i M

-- 4( -

[I- U, L 4L

Ln. U.SN LJ = 1 -i

UU W)c uLJC-J J 0= C. u = C

0 . .0 0 C- LU L

4L -4 x) -r 3 J C.9 O)U- I- cc >- < 0r C-0

CD u -i- z- 2m Lto) - cn UJ Z- 2: L

U). LU I-- < < = - U) MV))U) LiL) PLU mD n i-

LU n "a = 9 CD < LiIE~~~1 (n 4^ U)-. 0 0m i U L

'-M -L. X LU V< w Z U)-4. ") = ) x) 0 . ec- 3t PL4 "

<LU Zlu 0 LU UD Q. V)u 3LA. _j u0 0 LU I-- of I- 2l C)..oi< -i- .-LL LI- A LU V)c-c =C

CL:.2 < -=) - V)LU- .- < 4-4 _j _j-4 a

X L UB- = <Z 0L r MV 0 0=4 Lcc"B- L <0 =--U W B-- 0L -< LU LU o- ^$

a C == c .0 .-- 0 LOA V - V) -jxm 1- 06 Z3.cC=U B->- (DC j u)BM- InZ CD 0 X:i 4:e" < LUI-

L cD V)B -<) 00 cn am V) 0-- <0 0 eCD 0 ZLU=U 0 C7 D . < 0 0 %--

=U = V UU = .iU = D -= ) LU = = x=OO=

UZ L 00oO0I I-C =0( .J.. LLV<CDLUCWx LU4U) )O - C) C 4<aC. -4L-LL L LLL = LA-, - U L I- L -Z«4= L .J< LA-i L,>CA <Cr-() <C C J= r Cr =~0 -ZU = I- -O B- W .C U- =

LL - "= CW LJU) L LiCD 0 UL ) LLI U)UJLI < - UWLl CD CLCD11. D m CL C36 DOD. a.-C.%a.CD.

MD w Q- CD e- <- 0 -113 bei 46 -i . 0- m LU 1= U -

ZZZ B-ZZ ')-i'- ZZ Z >---U)I99a

* C%~936 E-I W O40e fs%- m0- ICD %D %D-l

m 00. C-L<2

+ 0D0Gr- )K CJIlCD% %0 qt -4 00 CV) C'~J UO

C)

x :_jc cml I-.- I.C. 00 W4a

U) E)

0 01

-4s IV0'-

U0 >b-

<Ua)CV)a > tl

U)) C- U C

4=I L- C) 0 00L\ .40v 0D

LL)1

LLJ CAC 0 ae

M) O0J co )"o C- C> ko

u0

C) w2c "

C)LOP CD -

..< <j- 0 ce 0DCL <m 4i-4 cX I- C3 I-> c%

C). 0 )rci U- LL 1.- 4-3J4- U)

U) 2 ~LL... 2 LL.. LU00v0 L -< LL >-1 i-uc

e-. Wi - 4~Lf

I-< < 1 -w < A ... J>- 0 oUUOr-4 - P14 - I- Go 00U %

CD 0 0o do > 211I-- .-. 01 -12 000i

0 U) M M c 0 c SLUJ LU >-Wu >-W 0mg- r.1- E e 4A

s~ul~ A-1 84 - cr 2- - IU)I- I L 0-I '-I- 6-4 -- U)0 0 U.

= w0 -O' -4 < P4 Lu0 ;: .)W

CL ~ ~ 0 (At0.-iU iC

100

0M LUI all(A x 0)0 r%. %D400k -( D D% l

Q . V40 -0l C~ ' V-

+

0n P40 00 .-4 %a q - %J40 CJ

U) 0LUO)Mzz LL 0C36- 11)40 00 )0C~ 00 V-04<L) Xa,4

CA -c 1x 4

0L u

V" -

00)

>- OCR

co =

WVcc C) 0 1-

M~~~C 0L 0 -

44k - LA4. D-. DJ)I%%

LI I C l

CS C-L W )

u qLD - 4 % .ia CO -

U) 1.- 1-' 0.5 ML- = zU) -U ooU

L. Go o _

0) L)

LL 00 LC )

mU LU 1-0.ClU I- L 1-4 %-J) 0 S )

uD CD C-) (AZ 0LA I- 2c. LA - 0- L U

LAJ~ LU~ Z 0-4

I-- O 0 "C 0.4C a -i> IV .Uafm ) f* a 0 co S.LCD -1 0CO P~- EU

0 -1 -~~J1 ) 0)c - i P

L LUU... >- - -A 1- 0 EU)a #

SI- I. 1iP- - 0-41-- U) -0 0 LA.

SI Z0 =D< -4 C-) < 4-4 Z L LUOu-<

101

* ONK

x m- _ 4 --- P-C 1. '-4LA- 0 0. -41

<4A

NiI csj -r, m w,-4 Ln q& O-tr J- ()0 r- -CJ -1 .

GO

r%% 00.v- covJ~ll a,

If(1

LL

U. 'U-

10- C L. 00nLiL 4 0~ 9-

IL =J0 0W )~ fC)~

>CD c. 0 C:1

co-LL U.01 a

(^ L) 0 0

co( -0 0

<~ C. C;O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C CJ-4 4n 0)- '44 %j

06.-- 1%D

-Zcm C.-

U.1~ ~ ~ ~ -iL . x C

<0. a, EU'-1LA

-, C L - 4 0L

0 uU -. -0t r1 14 ma, '.4

4c Cc.w

_j I- co I- 4- > C'a .J I 0 Lfl=- w-

0. U- = 2 1- L.4JI-

311 0 LLL1 4A LL.. LLU >-0 I..1s > .-I- = = ce4

4A LU (A Zi ix0. .- a -EvI- I0. "1- "- .- 0 4. EU)

- = QC -Cl> 0-4UuU

0- CA LA-J -i . -. 1

0 Z ...S I- 1 1102L

can give a relative measure of how the job satisfaction of AFSC 811XX careerfield personnel compare with other similar Air Force specialties. An indica-tion of how job satisfaction perceptions for the 811X0, 811X2, and 811X2Acareer ladders have changed over time is provided in Tables 66, 67, and 68,where TAFMS group data for 1992 survey respondents are presented, along withdata from respondents to the last occupational survey involving these careerladders, published in 1984. Finally, Table 69 presents job satisfactionresponses for the specialty job groups discussed in the SPECIALTY JOBS sectionof this report. An examination of these data can show how overall job satis-faction may be influenced by the type of job performed.

Review of Table 63 reflects that responses from 811X0 personnel are alllower than those of the comparative sample across all the TAFMS groups.Expressed job interest and perceived use of talents are substantially lowerfor the first- and second-enlistment groups. Even though 811X0 personnelreported very low job interest and perceived use of talents, they do indicatethey are doing what they were trained to do.

Responses for 811X2 personnel (see Table 64), while positive, aregenerally less than the comparative sample groups in other Direct Supportcareer ladders. It should be noted that the expressed job interest and talentutilization responses for 811X2 airmen are considerably higher than those forthe 811X0 groups.

Table 65 displays job satisfaction responses for 811X2A TAFMS groups. Incontrast to 811X0 and 811X2 group comparisons, 811X2A first-term airmenresponses are higher than the comparative sample groups (except for reenlist-ment intentions). Reenlistment intentions for 811X2A second-enlistmentpersonnel are markedly lower than the comparative sample group.

Comparison of job satisfaction indicator responses of current survey811X0, 811X2, and 811X2A TAFMS groups to those in the 1984 survey reflectsthat 811X0 airmen in the 1992 sample groups (see Table 66) are even lesssatisfied now than in 1984. While job interest responses for current 811X2airmen (Table 67) are lower than 1984 responses, perceived use of trainingresponses are essentially the same and on par with those in 1984. Except forthe reenlistment responses, all indicators for 811X2A personnel (see Table 68)are equal or higher for 1992 survey respondents. In reviewing these tables,it should be noted that positive responses pertaining to perceived utilizationof training for 811X0, 811X2, and 811X2A personnel are relatively high andindicate that training provided in these career ladders appears to be prettywell on target.

In the majority of the groups identified in the SPECIALTY JOBS analysis,members indicate that the jobs they perform are interesting, with 17 of the 21groups showing 50 percent or better responding positively (see Table 69). Itis noteworthy, however, that two of the groups (AIRCRAFT AND WEAPONS STORAGESECURITY and MISSILE SECURITY--see highlighted figures in Table 69) reflectpositive ratings from less than 30 percent of the members, and, significantly,these two groups represent two of the major clusters of 811X0 personnel(accounting for over 50 percent of the 811X0 airmen in the sample).

103

0%i

110)

2E

+L 0% '.0 V-4 en D)

0.U)CV ) 0r) '.0

cC)

ZC% 0

0- I n - .

cz 0)-4n

0 i

Lu LL q i C V

Cm LA

U) A

LUc LU if

LU w

I---

06 LUJco LU 0 Z

LU LUCi LUA

0 D LUJ

I-r0-J

2 LU 03 LUJcc LU rui m

-iS ' P4 0

I-- - P-4 C.

V) CO -j-A 1 JA=o) "C. U) c 4

doL -3'LU

104

zn 00c 0 r O

z+LLo 3

in

ccmr- C"m '01 00

z 00000 0

in

Ic 0

Zj co CAJ CV 1 00 co ~* LI LL, I

51 c-,cc'

- q4

LL WU ow iii

cr-LU I.-LIJ I--

LLU

9-ziLI

00 LJ LUz-

0c Lai

-JI- Cie

20 LU 0)1= LU C3 -

I -

0 .... ... .. .. .. ... ..

* n C7 IJ l ,C . 1U

.1. GoP..o *

4A. V1 0 ImoCl -

U)r

(D .c. cn 1

LA

=: M% V) C D)

2Co U. oc

30092 4n.

L>LJ < L

cm LAJ

CLAJ

CLJL

LLLI

OD LkU

U)4 LUccI-- 0

I- ..J ULU J

co -i LL2c uJ

i= 3t

0 LU

- - 0-i Bc-

- U) <.4c LL .LU cm 0A

Cie C3.LIl .LS

0 106

P"e K o4

MMC

di-

P4'DP 4 tI

- g 'D

P4

I-

14 M

rc z a

ata

04 IL aIi.L

04I14 1-- Ia :

1071

it'y

w5 NS onN0 4P o

ty Q 4 0a YCYi

*p41% N ~ CN I

on~~

Id

ILac

U

IW C

~~I- J 1N/N

0

zi I.0

.440-W

IL i 4.

44.

z .0

M. I I aj 44 as 4

b4 . -

au ai I-S9- a.- * a.. zon

108

4010

#A mi

A

('-N 04 ('.4

444

-

w W1i04 A4u. 0w 6-4

N4 It a- 4t Wt 4 Dn

a M

.40 CY 4 i & 0 c

~~1P in]P . r.

Mf wa. attaa

I.,a-. tyP-

ot .4

a- 0 o 64 w

o 0

1091

Five of the 21 groups in the SPECIALTY JOBS analysis indicate they areless than satisfied (fewer than 50 percent responding positively) with thesense of accomplishment gained from their work (this number includes all 4 ofthe groups noted above in the discussion of expressed job interest). Again,it is noteworthy that four of the five groups are comprised primarily of 811XOpersonnel.

Perceived utilization of talents was generally high for the job groupsoverall. Five groups had less than 60 percent of the members respondingpositively, and two of these five had less than 50 percent of their memberswith positive responses (see highlighted figures in Table 69).

All of the groups indicated that the work they were performing utilizedtheir training (over 50 percent responding positively). It should be notedthat even though the two largest groups, comprised primarily of 811XO person-nel, did not respond positively to job interest or use of talents, they doindicate that they were trained to do the jobs they are performing.

Expressed reenlistment intent for 20 of the 21 job groups was positive.Only the INSTALLATION ENTRY CONTROL group reported less than 50 percentpositive reenlistment intent.

When there are serious problems in a career ladder, survey respondentsare usually quite free with write-in comments to complain about perceivedproblems in the field. Sixteen percent of the survey sample used the write-infeature to convey some type of information, and 10 percent of the commentsreceived (representing less than 2 percent of the total sample) could becharacterized as complaints about the career field. While no major trendswere noted among the complaint-type write-ins, a number of comments werereceived pertaining to talents not being utilized properly (thus lendingsupport to the low indications reflected in Tables 63 and highlighted figuresof Table 69). Additionally, a number of respondents also feel that there aretoo many NCOs (primarily SSgts and TSgts), thus resulting in their having toperform jobs that they used to do when they were lower level airmen.

Career ladder managers and first-line supervisors must take note of theextremely low job satisfaction indicator responses for 811X0 career ladderpersonnel. These figures were low in 1984 and are even worse now. Anyefforts to enhance or vary 811X0 jobs in some way would almost certainly bebeneficial and have a positive effect on retention and recruiting in thefuture.

110

IMPLICATIONS

This survey was requested to evaluate changes in the career ladders andto obtain current task and equipment data for use in evaluating currenttraining programs. As previously mentioned in this report, even though thereare situations where 811X0 and 811X2/A personnel perform similar tasks, by andlarge, the differences between the two ladders and the A-shred are quiteclear. Survey data indicate personnel are performing jobs as defined in thecurrent classification structure.

Entry level training programs for the 811XX career field are, on thewhole, working well. The previously noted positive response patterns byvarious groups to the question pertaining to training utilization lend supportto this observation. Still, some adjustments to the STSs and POIs werediscussed in the individual career ladder sections of this report whichwarrant evaluation by training personnel, subject-matter experts, and careerladder managers.

Extremely low job interest continues to be a concern in the 811X0 careerladder and deserves the full attention of career ladder managers.

111

APPENDIX A

SELECTED REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMEDBY CAREER LADDER STRUCTURE GROUPS

112

TABLE I

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0300, INSTALLATION ENTRY CONTROL CLUSTERGROUP SIZE: 218 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 4%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-3 AVERAGE TICF: 29 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 32 MONTHS

The following are in descending order by percent members performing:

PERCENTMEMBERS

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMING

F343 Issue visitor passes 82F398 Stand guardmount 82F312 Direct traffic 800702 Assemble or disassemble M9 9mm or M15 .38 caliber revolvers 80F342 Issue traffic tickets or violation notices 76F334 Fire weapons to maintain qualification 75E175 Initiate AF Forms 52 (Evidence Tag) 74E260 Initiate or complete DO Forms 1408 (Armed Forces Traffic

Ticket) 730695 Assemble or disassemble GAU-5As or M-16 rifles 71F294 Brief post reliefs 70E177 Complete AF Forms 52 69E204 Initiate or complete AF Forms 75 (Visitor/Vehicle Pass

(Storage Safeguard)) 68F376 Provide directions or information to visitors 660705 Clean weapon mechanisms or parts 650694 Apply weapons preservatives or lubricants 64F352 Open or close installation primary entry control points 63E190 Initiate AF Forms 1169 (Statement of Witness) 62F335 Handcuff subjects 61G429 Perform traffic stops 60F378 Respond to duress or alarm activations 59E192 Complete AF Forms 1169 59F304 Conduct privately owned vehicle (POV) simple inspections at

installation entry points 57F291 Apprehend subjects 57E189 Complete AF Forms 1168 55F310 Detain civilians 52F300 Conduct building security checks 51E187 Initiate AF Forms 1168 (Statement of Suspect) 50F289 Advise individuals of their rights under Article 31,

Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 50E198 Complete AF Forms 1668 48E196 Initiate AF Forms 1668 (Field Interview) 47F307 Conduct suspect wall searches, without MWDs 45

Al

TABLE II

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0346, INSTALLATION PATROL CLUSTERGROUP SIZE: 1,029 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 17%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4/E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 76 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 80 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


E190 Initiate AF Forms 1169 (Statement of Witness) 93E175 Initiate AF Forms 52 (Evidence Tag) 90E177 Complete AF Forms 52 86F291 Apprehend subjects 85F335 Handcuff subjects 84F378 Respond to duress or alarm activations 83E196 Initiate AF Forms 1668 (Field Interview) 83F342 Issue traffic tickets or violation notices 80F288 Advise individuals of their Fifth Amendment rights 80F339 Interview witnesses, or complainants 80G429 Perform traffic stops 77F294 Brief post reliefs 75F312 Direct traffic 72F300 Conduct building security checks 720702 Assemble or disassemble M9 9mm or M15 .38 caliber.revolvers 71F307 Conduct suspect wall searches, without MWDs 70F380 Respond to on-base domestic disturbances 70F306 Conduct suspect kneeling searches, without MWDs 66E229 Initiate or complete AF Forms 1315 (Accident Report) 64F355 Operate vehicle radios or public address systems 62R884 Secure traffic accident scenes 62R886 Write traffic accident reports 60F343 Issue visitor passes 59F364 Perform on-base mobile patrols, without MWDs or horses 58R885 Test or operate speed measuring devices 56F303 Conduct preliminary investigations of incidents or

complaints 55R867 Administer field sobriety tests, other than improved

sobriety techniques 55F317 Employ challenge techniques, other than combat challenges 52F329 Escort personnel transporting funds or firearms, without

MWDs 52F293 Brief central security control (CSC) or law enforcement

(LE) desks on security status 51F374 Plot accidents, incidents, or disasters on maps 51

A2

TABLE III

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0335, INVESTIGATIONSGROUP SIZE: 90 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 2%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-5/E-6 AVERAGE TICF: 114 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 121 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


E187 Initiate AF Forms 1168 (Statement of Suspect) 99E189 Complete AF Forms 1168 98E190 Initiate AF Forms 1169 (Statement of Witness) 97E192 Complete AF Forms 1169 94E175 Initiate AF Forms 52 (Evidence Tag) 94F289 Advise individuals of their rights under Article 31,

Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 93F288 Advise individuals of their Fifth Amendment rights 92G432 Seize evidence 91E193 Initiate AF Forms 1176 (Authority to Search and Seize) 90F339 Interview witnesses, or complainants 89F302 Conduct follow-up investigations of incidents or complaints 88F338 Interrogate suspects or subjects 84E231 Initiate or complete AF Forms 1364 (Consent to Search and

Seizure) 84G424 Mark evidence 83F296 Compile reports of investigation packages 82F401 Take latent fingerprints 82F372 Photograph incident scenes 79F340 Inventory evidential, found, abandoned, or seized property 77F303 Conduct preliminary investigations of incidents or

complaints 76F385 Search buildings for evidence, without MWDs 71F403 Testify in military or civilian courts 68F393 Secure incident or crime scenes 67G430 Recognize or apply elements of proof and probable cause 64F400 Take foot or tire print impressions 62F315 Dispose of unclaimed evidential, found, abandoned, or

seized property 58G426 Perform child or spouse abuse or neglect preliminary

investigations 54E283 Type correspondence 53G411 Determine chains of custody 53

A3

TABLE IV

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0799, CONFINEMENT AND CORRECTIONSGROUP SIZE: 59 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4/E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 101 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 108 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


L559 Inspect prisoner personal belongings 98L535 Brief prisoners on facility rules and regulations 95L569 Search detention or confinement facilities for contraband,

without MWDs 92L544 Control entry into or movement within detention or

confinement facilities 90L542 Conduct prisoner simple searches 90L541 Conduct prisoner roll calls or head counts 88L550 Dispense prisoner medications 88L570 Search items brought into detention or confinement

facilities by visitors 86L574 Supervise prisoner visiting periods 85E249 Initiate or complete DD Forms 498 (Prisoner's Personal

History Record) 83E248 Initiate or complete DD Forms 497 (Confinement Order) 83L533 Assign prisoners to individual jobs or work crews 78E221 Initiate or complete AF Forms 807 (Receipt for Prisoner's

Personal Property) 78L554 Implement corrective measures for prisoner disciplinary

infractions 78L543 Confront prisoner disturbances 78L532 Approve or disapprove prisoners personal requests 75E244 Initiate or complete DO Forms 367 (Prisoner's Release

Order) 75L539 Conduct prisoner individual counseling sessions 73L536 Complete prisoner release orders 73L537 Compute prisoner sentences 69F328 Escort or transport detainees or prisoners 66L545 Coordinate prisoner pre- or post-release conferences with

action agencies 61L556 Inspect detention or confinement facilities for

conformance to security requirements 58L564 Maintain prisoner's correctional treatment files (CTF) 53

A4

TABLE V

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0328, CUSTOMSGROUP SIZE: 30 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: .5%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4/E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 84 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 88 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


M575 Clear personnel through customs 100M581 Review customs declarations 100M582 Review military aircraft passenger manifests 97M583 Search for customs contraband, without MWDs 97M579 Dispose of agricultural or edible materials obtained during

customs operations 97M584 Set up passenger or crew luggage customs inspection lines 90M577 Confiscate contraband 87M589 Write customs violation reports 73M578 Coordinate customs requirements with other agencies 73M586 Transfer contraband item custody to investigating agencies 67M588 Verify cargo manifests against cargo 63M580 Maintain customs declaration files 63E17S Initiate AF Forms 52 (Evidence Tag) 63M576 Collect and review U.S. customs permits to proceed 600694 Apply weapons preservatives or lubricants 570705 Clean weapon mechanisms or parts 57F334 Fire weapons to maintain qualification 57F289 Advise individuals of their rights under Article 31,

Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 570695 Assemble or disassemble GAU-5As or M-16 rifles 530702 Assemble or disassemble M9 9mm or M15 .38 caliber revolvers 53E176 Annotate AF Forms 52 53E190 Initiate AF Forms 1169 (Statement of Witness) 53E187 Initiate AF Forms 1168 (Statement of Suspect) 53M587 Transfer customs violator custody to investigating agencies 50F398 Stand guardmount 50E177 Complete AF Forms 52 50F294 Brief post reliefs 47F300 Conduct building security checks 47E261 Initiate or complete DD Forms 1569 (Incident/Complaint

Report) 47F291 Apprehend subjects 47

A5

TABLE VI

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0228, MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) HANDLINGCLUSTER

GROUP SIZE: 178 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 3%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4/E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 75 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 79 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


N592 Administer prescribed medications to dogs 93N651 Feed or water MWDs 90N649 Exercise or groom MWDs 88N662 Maintain MWD handling equipment. 86N590 Administer emergency first aid to MWDs 85N689 Train MWDs in on or off leash obedience 83E181 Initiate AF Forms 321 (Military Working Dog Training and

Utilization Record) 78N604 Conduct MWD care and handling proficiency training 75N687 Take MWDs to sick-call 74F378 Respond to duress or alarm activations 72N690 Train MWDs to ride in vehicles 72E190 Initiate AF Forms 1169 (Statement of Witness) 70N669 Patrol posts in vehicles with MWDs 70F342 Issue traffic tickets or violation notices 69E187 Initiate AF Forms 1168 (Statement of Suspect) 68F289 Advise individuals of their rights under Article 31,

Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 66F300 Conduct building security checks 65E196 Initiate AF Forms 1668 (Field Interview) 63F339 Interview witnesses or complainants 61F288 Advise individuals of their Fifth Amendment rights 61N614 Conduct narcotic or contraband detector MWDs proficiency

training 57N674 Prepare prescribed MWD diets 56F312 Direct traffic 56N606 Conduct MWD explosives detector proficiency training 54F383 Respond to verbal altercations, other than crowd control 53N684 Search vehicles with MWDs at restricted area or

installation entry points 53E264 Initiate or complete DD Forms 1920 (Alcoholic Influence

Report) 52N624 Conduct suspect wall searches with MWDs 51E193 Initiate AF Forms 1176 (Authority to Search and Seize) 50

A6

TABLE VII

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST1456, MILITARY WORKING DOG (MWD) TRAININGGROUP SIZE: 22 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: .4%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-3 AVERAGE TICF: 22 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 25 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


N651 Feed or water MWDs 100N663 Maintain MWD kennels or kennel areas 100N662 Maintain MWO handling equipment 91N664 Maintain MWD training and utilization records or charts 91N649 Exercise or groom MWDs 86N687 Take MWDs to sick-call 86N603 Conduct MWD care and handling initial training 86N635 Employ MWD principles of conditioning 77N653 Identify MWD behavior changes 77N601 Conduct MWD behavior change detection initial training 77E241 Initiate or complete AFMTC Forms 375 (Military Working Dog

Status Report) 77N685 Separate MWDs during dog fights 77N658 Inspect MWD health check points 73N592 Administer prescribed medications to dogs 73N636 Employ MWD safety procedures 68N619 Conduct protocol training for detector MWDs 68N674 Prepare prescribed MWD diets 64N596 Assess MWD proficiency training needs 64N611 Conduct MWD team drug detection initial training 55N590 Administer emergency first aid to MWDs 55N604 Conduct MWD care and handling proficiency training 50N689 Train IMWDs in on or off leash obedience 50N602 Conduct MWD behavior change detection proficiency training 50N607 Conduct MWD team building search initial training 36N690 Train MWDs to ride in vehicles 36N691 Train MWDs to tolerate crowds, individuals, or other dogs 32

A7

TABLE VIII

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: STO18B, AIRCRAFT AND WEAPONS STORAGE SECURITYCLUSTER

GROUP SIZE: 1,497 PERCENT OF. SAMPLE: 25%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4/E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 73 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 77 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


0695 Assemble or disassemble GAU-5As or M-16 rifles 84F398 Stand guardmount 83F378 Respond to duress or alarm activations 81F334 Fire weapons to maintain qualification 81F294 Brief post reliefs 780694 Apply weapons preservatives or lubricants 760705 Clean weapon mechanisms or parts 73F382 Respond to priority resource security situations, such as

helping-hand or covered wagon 71F365 Perform restricted area sentry duties 61F332 Examine restricted or controlled area badges 60F293 Brief central security control (CSC) or law enforcement

(LE) desks on security status 60F335 Handcuff subjects 57F370 Perform tactical deployment from nonhardened or standard

vehicles 56F306 Conduct suspect kneeling searches, without MWDs 54F355 Operate vehicle radios or public address systems 54F307 Conduct suspect wall searches, without MWDs 54F317 Employ challenge techniques, other than combat challenges 53F337 Inspect individual equipment for serviceability 52F305 Conduct suspect ground searches, without MWDs 510707 Inspect weapons operational condition 50F356 Perform close boundary sentry duties 50F300 Conduct building security checks 50F331 Evaluate situations at alarm activations 480718 Perform weapons functional checks 47F291 Apprehend subjects 46F369 Perform tactical deployment from hardened vehicles 45F387 Search government motor vehicles (GMV) at restricted area

or installation entry points, without MWDs 40F367 Perform security police vehicle operator maintenance 40J496 Control entry into restricted areas, other than missile

security areas 38

A8

TABLE IX

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0137, MISSILE SECURITY CLUSTERGROUP SIZE: 498 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 8%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4/E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 68 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 72 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


1470 Authenticate identity when entering missile launchfacilities (LF) 93

0695 Assemble or disassemble GAU-5As or M-16 rifles 790694 Apply weapons preservatives or lubricants 751474 Conduct missile site outer zone (OZ) or inner zone (IZ)

alarm inspections 751478 Destroy missile facility entry control code materials 74F334 Fire weapons to maintain qualifications 721489 Maintain missile site topside security 690705 Clean weapon mechanisms or parts 691479 Enter A-circuit combination changes 681492 Remove snow, debris, or excess dirt from missile sites 65F378 Respond to duress or alarm activations 641483 Inspect physical condition, security, or access to

missile sites 611490 Open-A circuit combinations 60F355 Operate vehicle radios or public address systems 57F294 Brief post reliefs 56F335 Handcuff subjects 561487 Maintain missile facility entry control classified code

materials 551494 Utilize time and distance matrices 550707 Inspect weapons operational condition 531472 Conduct metal detection searches of missile facility

visitors 52F306 Conduct suspect kneeling searches, without MWDs 500718 Perform weapons functional checks 48F382 Respond to priority resource security situations, such as

helping-hand or covered-wagon 461477 Control missile launch control facility (LCF) entries 44F305 Conduct suspect ground searches, without MWDs 44F337 Inspect individual equipment for serviceability 43F307 Conduct suspect wall searches, without MWDs 43F369 Perform tactical deployment from hardened vehicles 42

A9

TABLE X

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0796, KEYS AND CODES CONTROLGROUP SIZE: 12 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: .2%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 106 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 109 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


1486 Issue missile facility entry keys 1001487 Maintain missile facility entry control classified code

materials 1001485 Issue missile facility entry codes 100E279 Maintain entry authority or entry authorization lists (EAL)

accountability records 921488 Maintain missile facility unclassified access lists 831478 Destroy missile facility entry control code materials 83B51 Direct keys and codes control center operations 83E226 Initiate or complete AF Forms 1297 (Temporary Issue

Receipt) 83E272 Initiate or complete SF Forms 702 (Security Container

Check Sheet) 75E271 Initiate or complete SF Forms 701 (Activity Security

Checklist) 75E200 Initiate or annotate AF Forms 1109 (Visitor Register) 75H454 Maintain classified document accountability systems 67E190 Initiate AF Forms 1169 (Statement of Witness) 67C95 Evaluate administrative control of classified materials 58A8 Determine work priorities 58C135 Write EPRs 58A19 Develop or improve work methods or procedures 58Al Advise staff personnel on training matters 58E240 Initiate or complete AF Forms 2586 (Unescorted Entry

Authorization Certificate) 50H456 Maintain PRP files and rosters 50C99 Evaluate classified material destruction facilities 50A4 Conduct briefings, other than dispatch, departure, post

relief, patrol, prisoner, or facility visitor briefings 50B78 Supervise Security Specialists (AFSC 81150) 50F334 Fire weapons to maintain qualifications 50H437 Change security lock combinations 50E238 Initiate or complete AF Forms 2530 (Alarm System Test

Record) 50

A1O

TABLE XI

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0171, AIR BASE GROUND DEFENSE (ABGD) CLUSTERGROUP SIZE: 617 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 10%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4/E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 78 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 81 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


Q782 Employ individual camouflage 91Q749 Camouflage equipment or positions 900695 Assemble or disassemble GAU-5As or M-16 rifles 89Q783 Employ individual day movement techniques 85Q790 Employ team movement formations 840694 Apply weapons preservatives or lubricants 84Q784 Employ individual night movement techniques 84Q777 Employ field hygiene 82Q753 Construct individual fighting positions 80Q779 Employ field telephone systems 80Q780 Employ fire and maneuver techniques 78F378 Respond to duress or alarm activations 77Q774 Employ combat challenge techniques 76Q791 Employ team night movement techniques 75Q746 Adapt individual firing positions to terrain 73Q787 Employ NODs 72Q775 Employ combat first aid 71Q756 Cross danger areas 71Q811 Initiate or complete range cards 70Q778 Employ field signals 69F382 Respond to priority resource security situations, such as

helping-hand or covered-wagon 69Q751 Conduct combat searches 69F317 Employ challenge techniques, other than combat challenges 68F332 Examine restricted or controlled area badges 66F307 Conduct suspect wall searches, without MWDs 66F306 Conduct suspect kneeling searches, without MWDs 66Q758 Deploy during vehicle-mounted ABGD operations 65Q830 Participate in combat patrols, other than as leader 63Q748 Analyze terrain 62Q829 Participate in assault elements, other than as leader 60Q776 Employ communication authentication systems 59Q789 Employ stalking or reconnaissance techniques 58Q837 Perform listening post or observation post sentry duties 55Q769 Develop ABGD sector sketches or fields of fire 52

All

TABLE XII

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0293, EMERGENCY SERVICE TEAM (EST)GROUP SIZE: 15 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: .2%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4/E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 94 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 97 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


P724 Conduct tactical building approaches or force positioning 100P744 Write EST operations orders 100P745 Write EST warning orders 100P730 Employ tactical team lift or boosting techniques 100P726 Employ combat sniper marksman skills during actual or

simulated EST operations 93P739 Plot EST inner or outer perimeter positions 93P742 Select marksman overwatch positions 93P732 Enter buildings through doors or windows using tactical

ground-level entry techniques 93P740 Reconnoiter buildings or surrounding areas 87P741 Sectorize buildings or surrounding areas for EST search and

clear operations 87P725 Draft EST operations plans 87P738 Maintain EST tactical equipment 87P743 Write EST after action reports 87P722 Advise on-scene commanders on EST capabilities and

limitations 87P731 Employ wrecking tools for building entry 87P727 Employ counter sniper marksman skills during actual or

simulated EST operations 80P728 Employ diversionary tactics using pyrotechnics 80P723 Assist on-scene commanders in tactical planning 80P736 Enter buildings using stable rappelling 80P733 Enter buildings using grappling hook or knotted climbing

ropes 80P737 Evacuate wounded or innocents from danger areas 73Q749 Camouflage equipment or positions 53Q746 Adapt individual firing positions to terrain 53Q790 Employ team movement formations 530694 Apply weapons preservatives or lubricants 47

A12

TABLE XIII

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0096, ARMORYGROUP SIZE: 202 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 3%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4 AVERAGE TICF: 56 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 60 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS

REPRESENTATIVE-TASKS PERFORMING

0695 Assemble or disassemble GAU-5As or M-16 rifles 930708 Inventory ammunition, weapons, or equipment 930720 Secure ammunition, weapons, or equipment 920694 Apply weapons preservatives or lubricants 920709 Issue ammunition 900718 Perform weapons functional checks 890705 Clean weapon mechanisms or parts 880719 Recharge portable communications equipment batteries 880707 Inspect weapons operational condition 860711 Issue weapons or equipment to security police or combat

crew personnel 830702 Assemble or disassemble M9 9mm or M1I .38 caliber

revolvers 830697 Assemble or disassemble M-203 grenade launchers 760721 Secure weapon storage facilities 750710 Issue privately owned weapons 710713 Maintain ammunition, weapons, or unit equipment records 70E226 Initiate or complete AF Forms 1297 (Temporary Issue

Receipt) 660698 Assemble or disassemble M-60, M2 heavy barrel (HB) .50

caliber or M249 machine guns 640700 Assemble or disassemble M148, M79, or M203 grenade

launchers 63E200 Initiate or annotate AF Forms 1109 (Visitor Register) 630716 Operate or monitor weapons facility alarm systems 610696 Assemble or disassemble M-12 or M870 shotguns 59E228 Initiate or complete AF Forms 1314 (Firearms Registration) 580717 Perform minor weapons operator maintenance, other than

cleaning 52E216 Initiate or complete AF Forms 629 (Small Arms Hand Receipt) 48B42 Direct armory operations 46E238 Initiate or complete AF Forms 2530 (Alarm System Test

Record) 430712 Issue weapons, other than security police, combat crew,

or privately owned weapons 40

A13

TABLE XIV

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0177, MANAGEMENT AND STAFF CLUSTERGROUP SIZE: 248 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 4%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-7/E-8 AVERAGE TICF: 182 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 190 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


B88 Write correspondence 85A5 Coordinate support with base service organizations 82A8 Determine work priorities 82B40 Counsel personnel on personal or military related matters 81A19 Develop or improve work methods or procedures 73A4 Conduct briefings, other than dispatch, departure, post

relief, patrol, prisoner, or facility visitor briefings 72C135 Write EPRs 72Al Advise staff personnel on training matters 67A2 Assign personnel to duty positions 65A7 Determine requirements for space, personnel, equipment,

or supplies, for other than MWD or horse programs 63C130 Review inspection reports 63A29 Draft organizational policies, operating instructions (01),

or standard operating procedures (SOP) 63A34 Plan or schedule work assignments 63B71 Interpret policies, directives, or procedures 61A6 Coordinate with military or civilian agencies, for other

than convoys or prisoner release conferences 61C89 Analyze inspection reports 60A36 Schedule leaves or passes 60A37 Write job descriptions 56C125 Indorse enlisted performance reports (EPR) 54C91 Conduct post checks 54B75 Review administrative correspondence or reports 54B39 Conduct staff meetings 50C137 Write staff studies, surveys, special reports, or

regulation supplements 49Cl00 Evaluate compliance with work standards 48A31 Establish performance standards 48C124 Evaluate work schedules 47F334 Fire weapons to maintain qualification 46C90 Analyze workload requirements 46C132 Review security police forms 45

A14

TABLE XV

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0654, QUALITY CONTROLGROUP SIZE: 69 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-5/E-6 AVERAGE TICF: 144 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 149 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


A33 Plan inspection exercises 96C130 Review inspection reports 88C89 Analyze inspection reports 87C117 Evaluate quality control programs 86C97 Evaluate alert or emergency procedures 86C136 Write inspection reports 86D138 Administer tests 83C100 Evaluate compliance with work standards 83A21 Develop quality control or standardization programs 81D171 Score tests 78960 Direct quality control programs 78.i139 Analyze test results 77C102 Evaluate contingency plans 75E284 Update or access SPAS data 72C108 Evaluate law enforcement operations 68B88 Write correspondence 67C91 Conduct post checks 67E283 Type correspondence 64E218 Initiate or complete AF Forms 689 (Task Performance

Checklist) 62E278 Input security police automated system (SPAS) data 61A16 Develop inspection programs 58D170 Review training records, reports, or related data 58C110 Evaluate MWD team utilization 58C118 Evaluate resource protection or crime prevention programs 57C119 Evaluate safety or security programs 55A31 Establish performance standards 54C93 Evaluate ABGD operations 54C112 Evaluate pass and registration programs 54A19 Develop or improve work methods or procedures 51B49 Direct inspection activities 51C129 Outbrief inspection results 51C94 Evaluate administration and reports activities or

procedures 51

A15

TABLE XVI

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0512, UNIT TRAININGGROUP SIZE: 69 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-5/E-6 AVERAGE TICF: 133 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 139 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


D144 Conduct newly assigned security police personnelorientations 96

D138 Administer tests 94D171 Score tests 94Al Advise staff personnel on training matters 91D139 Analyze test results 88D173 Write test questions 88D170 Review training records, reports, or related data 860168 Plan or conduct general military training (GMT) or

ancillary training 840169 Procure training aids, facilities, or equipment, other than

narcotics or explosives training aids 84D166 Evaluate training methods, techniques, or programs 80E283 Type correspondence 77A5 Coordinate support with base service organizations 77D163 Establish or maintain study reference files 75E284 Update or access SPAS data 74A4 Conduct briefings, other than dispatch, departure, post

relief, patrol, prisoner, or facility visitor briefings 74E278 Input security police automated system (SPAS) data 70D148 Conduct special individualized training 67D147 Conduct security police augmenter training 65E217 Initiate or complete AF Forms 685 (Question Bank File) 64E219 Initiate or complete AF Forms 721 (Question Bank Key) 62D167 Maintain training records, charts, graphs, other than MWD

records 61D145 Conduct OJT 61D150 Counsel trainees on training progress 61D174 Write training reports, such as training quality reports 61F334 Fire weapons to maintain qualification 59D152 Determine OJT requirements 55B40 Counsel personnel on personal or military related matters 55E220 Initiate or complete AF Forms 797 (Job Qualification

Standard Continuation/Command JQS) 54

A16

TABLE XVII

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0190,.VEHICLE CONTROLGROUP SIZE: 17 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: .3%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 90 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 92 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


F368 Perform security police vehicle preventative maintenance 100F367 Perform security police vehicle operator maintenance 100F366 Perform security police vehicle intermediate or motor

pool maintenance 94E235 Initiate or complete AF Forms 1800 (Operator's Inspect

Guide and Trouble Report (General Purpose Veh)) 71C104 Evaluate government vehicle operator qualifications 71F355 Operate vehicle radios or public address systems 71E209 Initiate or complete AF Forms 171 (Req for Driver's

Training and Additions to U.S. Gov Mot Veh Op Permit) 65A8 Determine work priorities 65A5 Coordinate support with base service organizations 650694 Apply weapons preservatives or lubricants 65C135 Write EPRs 590695 Assemble or disassemble GAU-5As or M-16 rifles 59A16 Develop inspection programs 53R878 Examine vehicle tires 47R877 Examine vehicle lamps 47B88 Write correspondence 41E281 Perform special ceremonial duties, such as retreat or

reveille 41F337 Inspect individual equipment for serviceability 41E283 Type correspondence 41E270 Initiate or complete SF Form 91 (Operator's Report of

Motor Vehicle Accident) 41A29 Draft organizational policies, operating instructions (01),

or standard operating procedures (SOP) 41A4 Conduct briefings, other than dispatch, departure, post

relief, patrol, prisoner, or facility visitor briefings 41E190 Initiate AF Forms 1169 (Statement of Witness) 410707 Inspect weapons operational condition 41E226 Initiate or complete AF Forms 1297 (Temporary Issue

Receipt) 35E284 Update or access SPAS data 35

A17

TABLE XVIII

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0627, CRIME PREVENTION AND RESOURCE PROTECTIONGROUP SIZE: 52 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 105 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 112 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


H438 Conduct antirobbery or drug awareness training 92H439 Conduct crime prevention surveys 88H462 Provide crime prevention consultation services 88B45 Direct crime prevention and resource protection programs 85H451 Initiate resource protection exercises 83H461 Procure crime prevention program literature 83H459 Participate in base crime prevention working groups (CPWG) 83C118 Evaluate resource protection or crime prevention programs 81H452 Inspect funds facilities 79C137 Write staff studies, surveys, special reports, or

regulation supplements 79H446 Deliver base or community-wide crime prevention lectures 79H449 Establish crime prevention projects, such as eperation

identification, neighborhood watch, or crime stop 77H453 Inspect weapons or ammunition facilities 75H447 Develop and implement crime prevention program media

campaigns 73H463 Provide initial or supplemental training to unit crimeprevention focal point monitors 73

A5 Coordinate support with base service organizations 71H435 Analyze criminal statistical data 69B88 Write correspondence 69A22 Develop resource protection plans 67A16 Develop inspection programs 67H458 Maintain unit security manager or crime prevention monitor

appointment files 65C136 Write inspection reports 63H469 Write funds or weapons inspection reports 63A33 Plan inspection exercises 630143 Conduct base newcomer personnel orientations 63C92 Conduct staff assistance visits (SAV) 62H468 Write funds or weapons inspection checklists 62H460 Participate in police youth programs 58E283 Type correspondence 52

A18

TABLE XIX

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0385, INFORMATION, PERSONNEL, AND INDUSTRIALSECURITY

GROUP SIZE: 82 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1ZPREDOMINANT GRADE: E-5/E-7 AVERAGE TICF: 153 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 158 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


H442 Conduct information security program annual reviews 91A15 Develop information security plans 91C106 Evaluate information or personnel security programs 89B48 Direct information security activities 88H444 Conduct security manager meetings 87H466 Review reports of compromise or security preliminary

inquiries 84H443 Conduct security education or motivation training 83B59 Direct personnel security programs 82E245 Initiate or complete DD Forms 398 (Personnel Security

Questionnaire (BI/SBI) 79H441 Conduct industrial or physical security inspections 78E239 Initiate or complete AF Forms 2583 (Request for Personnel

Security Action) 77H457 Maintain special security files 74C95 Evaluate administrative control of classified materials 73H458 Maintain unit security manager or crime prevention monitor

appointment files 73A16 Develop inspection programs 73E246 Initiate or complete DD Forms 398-2 (Personnel Security

Questionnaire (National Agency Check)) 72H467 Review security classification guides or specifications 72C99 Evaluate classified material destruction facilities 71C136 Write inspection reports 68C105 Evaluate industrial security programs 67A14 Develop industrial security programs 67E283 Type correspondence 65H448 Develop security education materials 65B47 Direct industrial security programs 62E263 Initiate or complete DO Forms 1879 (Request for Personnel

Security Investigation) 55E267 Initiate or complete FD Forms 258 (FBI Applicant

Fingerprint Card) 54H436 Analyze material for security discrepancies 52

A19

TABLE XX

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0363, REPORTS AND ANALYSISGROUP SIZE: 37 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 99 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 104 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


E199 Initiate or annotate AF Forms 110 (Individual IncidentReference Record) 92

E227 Initiate or complete AF Forms 1313 (Driver Record) 86E283 Type correspondence 84G423 Maintain disciplinary action files, such as revocation,

barred persons, or suspended driver files 81E261 Initiate or complete DD Forms 1569 (Incident/Complaint

Report) 81B88 Write correspondence 73E205 Initiate or complete AF Forms 84 (USAF Law Enforcement

Report) 73B41 Direct administration and reports activities 70B75 Review administrative correspondence or reports 68H445 Conduct security police record checks 68A19 Develop or improve work methods or procedures 68E260 Initiate or complete DD Forms 1408 (Armed Forces Traffic

Ticket) 65A8 Determine work priorities 57A6 Coordinate with military or civilian agencies, for other

than convoys or prisoner release conferences 54B40 Counsel personnel on personal or military related matters 51H435 Analyze criminal statistical data 49C94 Evaluate administration and reports activities or

procedures 46C132 Review security police forms 46E222 Initiate or complete AF Forms 840 (Minor Motor Vehicle

Accident Report) 46A4 Conduct briefings, other than dispatch, departure, post

relief, patrol, prisoner, or facility visitor briefings 46C120 Evaluate security police reports 43

A20

TABLE XXI

GROUP ID NUMBER AND TITLE: ST0179, PASS AND REGISTRATIONGROUP SIZE: 81 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%PREDOMINANT GRADE: E-4 AVERAGE TICF: 95 MONTHSAVERAGE TAFMS: 99 MONTHS


PERCENTMEMBERS


E280 Maintain restricted or controlled area badge oridentification card accountability records 88

G419 Issue identification cards or badges 84F341 Issue restricted or controlled area badges 84G420 Issue vehicle decals 83E282 Photograph personnel for identification credentials, other

than prisoners 83F343 Issue visitor passes 81G433 Verify vehicle registrations 75E204 Initiate or complete AF Forms 75 (Visitor/Vehicle Pass

(Storage Safeguard)) 75B55 Direct pass and registration programs 70E283 Type correspondence 69C112 Evaluate pass and-registration programs 59E284 Update or access SPAS data 56E278 Input security police automated system (SPAS) data 56F333 Fingerprint personnel or prisoners 53B88 Write correspondence 53B40 Counsel personnel on personal or military related matters 51C135 Write EPRs 49E279 Maintain entry authority or entry authorization lists (EAL)

accountability records 48F332 Examine restricted or controlled are badges 47A8 Determine work priorities 44E240 Initiate or complete AF Forms 2586 (Unescorted Entry

Authorization Certificate) 42F376 Provide directions or information to visitors 37A4 Conduct briefings, other than dispatch, departure, post

relief, patrol, prisoner, or facility visitor briefings 37G409 Access SPAS information 35E285 Update automated security police programs, other than Air

Force Law Enforcement System (AFLETS) or SPAS 35

A21

Documents

OCC UPA TIONAL A SUR VEY REPORT · 2011. 5. 14. · ad-a253 780 air foce dtic occ upa tional a sur vey report security police career ladders afscs 811x0, 811x2, and 811x2a afpt 90-811-m582