Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OCP International Partnership © 2008
Industry Organizations Comparison Chart(IP ’08, December 3, 2008 - Grenoble, France)
Ian R. Mackintosh
Chairman & President, OCP-IP
OCP International Partnership © 2008
So, what is it?
• Overview of multiple trade organizations• Describes roles and characteristics of these different
groups• A quick reference chart
• Basically, a spreadsheet
2
OCP International Partnership © 2008
Why developed?
• Ongoing enquiries and misunderstandings • Members & Industry, alike
• Invisibility of landscape• No cohesive reference aid• Opportunity to accelerate awareness
• Economic times are bleak. So…• Help understanding of activities, value & benefits• Provide guidance and support for those justifying
budgets
3
OCP International Partnership © 2008
Uses
• Provide rapid orientations to individual “.orgs”• Facilitate understanding across the industry• Highlight the DIFFERENT value propositions & goals• Highlight the many similarities and numerous
differences
4
OCP International Partnership © 2008
Who needs it?
• Engineering• Seeking TTM and cost-reduction advantages in
collaboration/resource sharing• Marketing
• Seeking data and knowledge for business development, strategic alignment & partnerships
• Management• Deciding “Make vs. Buy” opportunities and
justifying expenditures5
OCP International Partnership © 2008
What does it contain?
• It’s a spreadsheet• Showing high-level characteristics of participant
organizations…
6
OCP International Partnership © 2008
.Org spreadsheet
7
OCP International Partnership © 2008
.Org spreadsheet (cont’d)
8
OCP International Partnership © 2008
Some Interesting Observations• Different focuses, missions, working structures and operations
• Purpose built/one form does NOT fit all!• Different infrastructures required to support each standard or
business purpose• Money IS important
• Primarily membership dues• Was once heavily denied• Benefits, standards and services are PRODUCTS and must be
marketed as such• .Orgs list many collaborations
• Despite the rumors!
9
OCP International Partnership © 2008
Availability
• Press release date: September 30, 2008• FREE public access
• www.ocpip.org• FREE participation
• Contact [email protected]
10
OCP International Partnership © 2008
Summary• Interest very high
• 1500 hits in two months• Podcast in 4 locations
• Most Engineering Companies need to leverage several or many such memberships• Should “Buy vs. Make” all NON-CORE products, standards and data• Cost savings and TTM advantages• Economies of scale
• All mature industries become “standards-centric”• Sharing data, information and actual standards• Unwise to be left behind!
11
OCP International Partnership © 2008 12
OCP-IP Industry Vision
Source: Mackintosh Model
Proprietary/Closed
NATIVE
PP P
Corporate Growth(Product-centric)
Industry Growth(Standard-centric)
Best-of-Breed/Open
Proprietary/Closed
Proprietary/Closed
WHOLEVALUE ADDED INFRASTRUCTURE
S
OCP International Partnership © 2008
A Parochial Note: OCP-IP Update
• OCP Checker• In CoreCreator II, PR date 11/19
• TLM Kits• World class and OSCI 2.0• Testing EOY as planned, ship 1Q09
• OCP 3.0• Technically complete/drafting• Huge body of work• Working Group (WG) participants have full access• Cache coherence, power management, 3rd consensus high-
speed profile, etc.
13
OCP International Partnership © 2008
Industry Organizations Comparison Chart(IP ’08, December 3, 2008 - Grenoble, France)
Ian R. Mackintosh
Chairman & President, OCP-IP
