24
ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section www.odot.state.or.us/eshtm/arch.htm

ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

ODOT Archaeology

Environmental Services Section www.odot.state.or.us/eshtm/arch.htm

Page 2: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Introduction

– Resource Description

– Laws & Regulations

– Range of potential impacts and protective measures

– Internal processes and costs

Page 3: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Resource description: archaeological sites• Archaeological

resources or sites: locations that contain evidence of previous human presence or activity

• Evaluating archaeological resources is an exercise in discovery

Living floor from Newberry Crater, ca. 9500 BCE

Page 4: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Why is ODOT involved?• Seven federal laws and three Oregon state laws

regulate the protection of archaeological resources

• It’s the right thing to do:

– Tribal relationships

– Stewardship responsibilities

Cedar-root baskets made by the Klickitat Tribe of southwest Washington, ca. 1900

Page 5: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA):• Stipulates that federally assisted undertakings

must evaluate effects to natural and cultural resources

• Culminates in preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

• Allows for public and tribal involvement in decision making process.

Page 6: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Section 106:• Requires federally

funded undertakings to take into account effects to cultural resources, including archaeological resources

• Specifies a process and establishes criteria by which to evaluate cultural resources

Sagebrush bark sandals from Fort Rock cave, ca. 9000 BCE

Page 7: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Department of Transportation Act, Section 4(f):• Specifies that transportation projects should

strive to protect cultural resources

• If a feasible alternative exists where the transportation project can be constructed and avoid the cultural resource, 4(f) requires the selection of that alternative

• Only applies to archaeological sites if preservation in place is warranted

Page 8: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Example: Mosier Mounds Complex, Wasco Co.

Page 9: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act (CRGNSA):

• Establishes specific processes for dealing with protection of cultural resources within the Gorge National Scenic Area

– Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs– Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla– Yakama Indian Nation (Washington)– Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho

• Mandates consultation with Columbia River Treaty Tribes

Celilo Falls, ca. 1900. Benjamin Gifford

Page 10: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

ORS 97.740: Indian Graves and Protected Objects• Specifies penalties for disturbance of

Indian graves or funerary/sacred objects

• Persons disturbing such remains, including through inadvertence, must reinter at own expense, in coordination with the appropriate Tribe(s)

Page 11: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

ORS 358.905: Archaeological Objects and Sites• Specifies that removal or

excavation of archaeological material must be authorized by a permit issued by State Parks and Recreation Department (SHPO)

Page 12: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

ORS 390.235: Archaeological Sites and Historical Materials• Specifies that no

permit is effective without approval of state agency managing public land, and appropriate Indian Tribe(s)

Page 13: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Stewardship and Government-to-Government Relationships

• Coordination and positive relationships with Oregon’s Tribes are critical for success of projects involving archaeological resources

• Executive order 96-30: Tribes have legal status as independent nations, relationship is one of government to government.

• Regulations consider a resource’s information potential; prehistoric sites often possess a cultural significance for the Tribes that transcends information value.

Page 14: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Potential range of impacts:

• Ground disturbance:

– Staging of equipment and material

– Embankment

– Guardrail installation/flaring

– Culvert extensions, etc.

Page 15: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Urban archaeology:• Difficult to identify through

field survey; despite extensive disturbance, potential exists for undiscovered sites during construction

• Coordination is key: contact ODOT archaeologists if cultural material is encountered during project construction

Euro-American iron buckle fromLimpy Creek, Rogue River

Page 16: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Protective Measures: Specifications 00170.51: Protection of Cultural Sites

• Lists federal and state laws that address protection of cultural resources on the job

• Details protective measures to maintain and consequences of disturbance

• Streamlines the process for regulatory buy-off

Page 17: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Protective Measures: No work zones

• Cost: in most circumstances no work zones satisfy federal regulations and Tribal concerns without further cost, time

• Visibility: demonstrates ODOT’s commitment to protecting sensitive areas to Tribes and Regulators

Page 18: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

• Assists contractor in knowing exactly where sensitive areas are on a project

• Avoids accidental disturbance to resources during project construction.

Protective Measures: No work zones

Page 19: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

• Typically Typically extend extend from ditch from ditch line to line to right-of-right-of-way way boundaryboundary

No work zoneNo work zone

Protective Measures: No work Protective Measures: No work zoneszones

Page 20: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Internal Procedures: Phase I• Consists of a search of

archaeological sites records and historic documents

• Field survey and exploratory sub-surface probing when appropriate

• Averages one month to complete, with minimal cost, ca. $4k

Page 21: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Internal Procedures: Phase II

• Sub-surface testing to determine boundaries, content, integrity and significance

• If sites are not significant, no further investigation is necessary; if site is significant and unavoidable, mitigation strategies must be identified (phase III)

• Phase II averages 3-6 months, and costs an average of 30k per site.

Page 22: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Internal Procedures: Phase III• If a significant

site is unavoidable, data recovery records and preserves information from the site

• Time-consuming and costly; development and review of data recovery plan can take 6-9 months, and fieldwork is labor and time intensive. Phase III begins at ca. 100k and can exceed 1000k.

Page 23: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Conclusion• Coordination early in project development

• Communication on scope changes and willingness to explore creative solutions

• Early identification, communication and protective measures help to ensure projects– avoid resource conflicts,

– obtain clearance from Tribes and Regulators

– stay on schedule

Page 24: ODOT Archaeology Environmental Services Section

Contacts:Contacts:

•In the event of accidental discovery or In the event of accidental discovery or disturbance of known sites, call:disturbance of known sites, call:

Hal GardEnvironmental ServicesOffice: (503) 986-3508Cell: (503) 551-1611

Kirsten AndersonEnvironmental ServicesOffice: (503) 986-3512Cell: (503) 508-6707

We will then coordinate with Project Manager, Project Team Leader, Tribes and Regulator to coordinate resolution. www.odot.state.or.us/eshtm/arch.htm