Upload
daisyfield88
View
231
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 1/30
Wireless Networking
Design Seminar
Simulation of OFDM Impairments
using ADS WLAN 802.11a DesignLibrary and DesignGuide
Agilent Technologies
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 2/30
Page 2Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 2Agilent Technologies
Contents
OFDM Modulation Review
Using ADS to Evaluate Effects of Link Impairments
on OFDM Modulation
WLAN 802.11a ADS DesignGuide
(ADS 2002 software release)
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 3/30
Page 3Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 3Agilent Technologies
OFDM Modulation Review
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 4/30
Page 4Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 4Agilent Technologies
Concept of OFDM
• A type of multi-carrier modulation
• Single high-rate bit stream is
converted to low-rate N parallel bit
streams
• Each parallel bit stream is modulated
on one of N sub-carriers
• Each sub-carrier can be modulated
differently. For example, BPSK,QPSK or QAM
• To achieve high bandwidth efficiency,
the spectrum of the sub-carriers are
closely spaced and overlapped• Nulls in each sub-carrier’s spectrum
land at the center of all other sub-
carriers (orthogonal)
• OFDM symbols are generated using
IFFT
OFDM Spectrum
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 5/30
Page 5Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 5Agilent Technologies
Advantages of OFDM
Robustness in muti-path propagation environment
More tolerant of delay spread:
Due to the use of many sub-carriers, the symbol duration on
the sub-carriers is increased, relative to delay spread.
Inter-symbol interference is avoided through the use of
guard interval.
Simplified or eliminate equalisation needs, as compared tosingle carrier modulation.
More resistant to fading. FEC is used to correct for sub-carriers
that suffer from deep fade.
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 6/30
Page 6Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 6Agilent Technologies
Design Challenges of OFDM Modulation
Sensitive to frequency offset – need frequency offset correction
in the receiver.
Sensitive to oscillator phase noise -- “clean” and stable
oscillator required. Large peak to average ratio – amplifier back-off, reduced power
efficiency.
IFFT/FFT complexity -- fixed point implementation to optimize
latency and performance.
Intersymbol Interference (ISI) due to multipath-use guard
interval.
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 7/30
Page 7Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 7Agilent Technologies
Intersymbol Interference(ISI) Due to Multipath
ISI Symbol interferes with
the delayed version of itself
Multipath
delayed signal
ofdm symbol 1 ofdm symbol 2
This part will
destroy
orthogonality of
OFDM symbol
Direct path
signal
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 8/30
Page 8Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 8Agilent Technologies
Guard Interval
Multipath delays up to the guard time do not cause Inter-Symbol Interference
Sub-carriers remain orthogonal for multipath delays up to guard time (no Inter-
Carrier Interference)
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 9/30
Page 9Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 9Agilent Technologies
Windowing
To reduce spectrum splatter, the OFDM symbol is multiplied by a raised-cosine window,
w(t) before transmission to more quickly reduce the power of out-of-band sub-carriers.
Figure above shows spectra for 64 sub-carriers with different values of the rolloff factor, βof the raised cosine window.
Larger β, better spectral roll-off.
However, a roll-off factor of β reduces delay spread tolerance by a factor of βTS.
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 10/30
Page 10Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 10Agilent Technologies
OFDM Transceiver Block Diagram
IQ
Modulator
IQ
Modulator
QAM
Mapping
QAM
MappingPilot
Insertion
Pilot
Insertion
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
DACDAC
HPA
Remove
G.I.
Remove
G.I.Channel
Correction
Channel
Correction
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
LNA
AGC Amp
Rx Lev. Det.
Receiver
Transmitter
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
DataIn
ADCADC
Timing &
Frequency
Synchronisation
Timing &
Frequency
Synchronisation
QAM
Demapping
QAM
Demapping
DataOut
Frequencycorrectedsignal
Symbol Timing
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 11/30
Page 11Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 11Agilent Technologies
OFDM Transceiver Block Diagram: Sources of
Link Impairments
IQ
Modulator
IQ
Modulator
QAM
Mapping
QAM
MappingPilot
Insertion
Pilot
Insertion
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
DACDAC
HPA
Remove
G.I.
Remove
G.I.Channel
Correction
Channel
Correction
LNA
AGC Amp
Rx Lev. Det.
DataIn
ADCADC
Timing &
Frequency
Synchronization
Timing &
Frequency
Synchronization
QAM
Demapping
QAM
Demapping
DataOut
Frequencycorrectedsignal
Symbol Timing
FixedPointeffects
Oscillator Phase Noise
Oscillator Phase Noise,Frequency Offset
Power AmplifierNon-linearity
Multipath
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
Note: other impairments:
-AGC response time
-ADC/DAC quantization noise
-Modem impairments....
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 12/30
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 13/30
Page 13Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 13Agilent Technologies
Effects of Frequency Offset
IQ
Modulator
IQ
Modulator
QAM
Mapping
QAM
MappingPilot
Insertion
Pilot
Insertion
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
DACDAC
HPA
Remove
G.I.
Remove
G.I.Channel
Correction
Channel
Correction
LNA
AGC Amp
Rx Lev. Det.
DataIn
ADCADC
Timing &
Frequency
Synchronization
Timing &
Frequency
Synchronization
QAM
Demapping
QAM
Demapping
DataOut
Frequencycorrectedsignal
Symbol Timing
Frequency Offset
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
Note: In OFDM link, the sub-carriers are perfectly
orthogonal only if transmitter and receiver use exactly
the same frequencies, any frequency offset results in
Inter-Carrier Interference (ICI).
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 14/30
Page 14Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 14Agilent Technologies
Inter-Carrier Interference(ICI) Due to Frequency
Offset
1/T
FFT
T
T
FFT
No frequency offset
With frequency offset
FFT window
Integer number of cycles of the sub-carrier ensures that the nulls of the
spectrum lands on the FFT bin,
condition to avoid inter-carrier
interference (ICI)
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 15/30
Page 15Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 15Agilent Technologies
OFDM Operation (ICI problem)
10 20 30 40 50 600 70
0.5
1.0
0.0
1.5
Index
m a g ( F 1 )
10 20 30 40 50 600 70
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
-0.03
0.03
Index
r e a l ( T 1 )
Symbol to be transmitted(Magnitude spectrum)
I-channel signal(after IFFT)
Recovered symbolcontains ICI
DemodulatedI-channel signal
10 20 30 40 50 600 70
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
-0.03
0.03
Index
r e a l ( R T 1 )
10 20 30 40 50 600 70
0.5
1.0
0.0
1.5
Index
m a g ( R F 1 )
Frequency offset = 60 kHz
FFT
I-Q Demodulator
IFFT
I-Q Modulator
N_Tones
N2
RandomPhase=No
Phase1=0.0
Power1=.010 W
Frequency1=(FCarrier-0.06) MHz
TStep=tstep sec
N_Tones
N1
Phase1=0.0
Power1=.010 W
Frequency1=FCarrier MHz
TStep=tstep sec
RectToCx
R1
NumericSink
RF1
FFT_Cx
F17
Direction=Forward
Size=64
Order=6
TimedToFloat
T5
TimedToFloat
T4
QAM_DemodExtOsc
Q2
PhaseImbalance=0
GainImbalance=0
Sensitivity=0.5
FloatToTimed
F16
TStep=0.0 sec
FloatToTimed
F15
TStep=0.0 sec
FFT_Cx
F11
Direction=Inverse
Size=64
Order=6
WaveFormCx
W1
Period=64
Periodic=YES
ControlSimulation=NO
Val ue="(0) (0) (0) (1+j) "
CxToRect
C1
QAM_ModExtOsc
Q1
PhaseImbalance=0
GainImbalance=0
VRef=1 V
Power=0.01 W
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 16/30
Page 16Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 16Agilent Technologies
Effects of Frequency Offset – Without
Frequency Correction
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
real(iq[1,::])
i m a g ( i q [ 1
, : : ] )
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
-2
-1
0
1
2
real(iq[2,::])
i m a g ( i q [ 2
, : : ] )
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
real(iq[3,::])
i m a g ( i q [ 3
, : : ] )
AA=0Freq. Offset = 0 HzFreq. Offset / Freq. Spacing = 0%
AA=1Freq. Offset = 3.125 kHzFreq. Offset / Freq. Spacing = 1%
AA=2Freq. Offset = 31.25 kHzFreq. Offset / Freq. Spacing = 10%
AA=3Freq. Offset = 156.25 kHzFreq. Offset / Freq. Spacing = 50%
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
real(iq[0,::])
i m a g ( i q [ 0
, : : ] )
Freq. Offset / Freq. Spacing
0%
1%
10%
50%
IndexAA=0.000
40
AA=1.000
40AA=2.000
40
AA=3.00040
ReceiverEVM
1.198E-5
0.025
0.268
2.840
Frequency offset expressed as a percentage of sub-carriers frequency spacing (∆f=312.5kHz):
0% 1% 10% 50%
Why you need
frequency offset correction:
assume freq. offset=3kHz (1%),
requires:
oscillator stability: 3k/5.8G=0.5ppm!
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 17/30
Page 17Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 17Agilent Technologies
Frequency Offset Estimation Using Preambles
Make use of short preamble for coarse frequency offset estimationand long preamble for fine frequency offset estimation.
Short preamble symbol duration of 0.8µs allows frequency
correction up to 1/(2x0.8µs)=±625kHz Assume RF frequency=5.8GHz, the tolerable frequency offset
(worst case) =0.5x625k/5.8G=±53.8ppm > ±20ppm specified in802.11a.
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 18/30
Page 18Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 18Agilent Technologies
Frequency Offset Estimation and Correction
Frequency offset compensation network:
WLAN_PhaseEst
PhaseDerot
Order=Order
Carriers=52
WLAN
O
WLAN_ChEstimator
ChannelEstimator
Order=Order Carriers=52
WLAN
CIR
WLAN_OFDMEqualizer
Equalizer
Carriers=52
WLAN
Equalizer
WLAN_PhaseTrack
PhaseDerotated
Phase=0
Order=Order
Carriers=52
Rate=Rate
Length=Length
WLAN
track
O
WLAN_MuxDataChEst
MuxData_and_ChEst
Order=Order
Rate=Rate
Length=Length
WLAN
x
h
xh Port
P2
Num=2FFT_Cx
F10
Direction=ForwardSize=FFTSize
Order=Order
FFT_Cx
F8
Direction=Forward
Size=FFTSize
Order=Order
FFT_Cx
F11
Direction=Forward
Size=FFTSize
Order=Order
WLAN_BurstReceiver
BurstRec
Order=Order
Rate=Rate
Length=Length
WLAN
burst
WLAN_BurstSync
FrameSync
Order=Order
Sync
WLAN
Fork3
F12
Fork3
F13
WLAN_FineFreqSync
W1
Order=Order
f
WLAN
O
WLAN_FreqSync
FreqOffsetDetect
Order=Order
WLAN
O
Fork2
F14
Add2
A1
WLAN_DemuxBurst
DemuxFrame
Order=Order
Rate=Rate
Length=Length
WLAN0
S L DATA
OFDM Sym
Port
P1
Num=1
Channel correction
Fine frequency offset correction
& channel estimation
LongPreamble1
LongPreamble2
ShortPreamble
Coarse frequency offset
correction
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 19/30
Page 19Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 19Agilent Technologies
Effects of Frequency Offset – with Frequency
CorrectionFrequency offset expressed as a percentage of sub-carriers frequency spacing (∆f=312.5kHz):
0% 1% 10% 50%
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
real(iq[2,::])
i m a g ( i q [ 2 , : : ] )
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
real(iq[3,::])
i m a g ( i q [ 3 , : : ] )
AA=0
Freq. Offset = 0 HzFreq. Offset / Freq. Spacing = 0%
AA=1
Freq. Offset = 3.125 kHzFreq. Offset / Freq. Spacing = 1%
AA=2
Freq. Offset = 31.25 kHzFreq. Offset / Freq. Spacing = 10%
AA=3
Freq. Offset = 156.25 kHzFreq. Offset / Freq. Spacing = 50%
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
real(iq[0,::])
i m a g ( i q [ 0 , : : ] )
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
real(iq[1,::])
i m a g ( i q [ 1 , : : ] )
Freq. Offset / Freq. Spacing
0%
1%
10%
50%
IndexAA=0.000
40
AA=1.00040
AA=2.00040
AA=3.00040
ReceiverEVM
1.199E-5
1.214E-5
1.211E-5
1.210E-5
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 20/30
Page 20Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 20Agilent Technologies
Effects of Oscillator Phase Noise
IQ
Modulator
IQ
Modulator
QAM
Mapping
QAM
MappingPilot
Insertion
Pilot
Insertion
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
DACDAC
HPA
Remove
G.I.
Remove
G.I.Channel
Correction
Channel
Correction
LNA
AGC Amp
Rx Lev. Det.
DataIn
ADCADC
Timing &
Frequency
Synchronization
Timing &Frequency
Synchronization
QAM
Demapping
QAM
Demapping
DataOut
Frequencycorrectedsignal
Symbol Timing
Oscillator Phase Noise
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
Note: A practical oscillator does not
produce a carrier at exactly one frequency,
but rather a carrier that is phase
modulated by random phase jitter, As a
result, the frequency is never perfectly
constant, thereby causing ICI.
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 21/30
Page 21Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 21Agilent Technologies
Effects of Oscillator Phase Noise
1/T
FFT Bin Spacing is 1/T
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 22/30
Page 22Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 22Agilent Technologies
Effects of Oscillator Phase Noise (continued)
N_Tones model is used to model the phase noise
Based on Lorentzian spectrum
Characterized by –3dB-linewidth, -20dB per decade slope
N_Tones
N1
PN_Type=Random PN
PhaseNoiseData=PN
RandomPhase=No
AdditionalTones=""
Phase1=0.0
Power1=.010 W
Frequency1=FCarrier MHz
TStep=50 nsec
Frequency offset[Hz]
PSD[Hz]
0
-3
-20dB/decade
-3dB linewidth
linewidthdB f
f f
f f S
l
l
l s
3:
/1
/2)(
22
−
+
=π
Phase noise profile based on Lorentzian spectrum
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 23/30
Page 23Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 23Agilent Technologies
Effects of Oscillator Phase Noise (continued)
3 profiles of phase noise were simulated:
5.199 5.201
-120
-20
freq, GHz
d B m ( S 1 [ 0 , : : ] )
5.199 5.201
-120
-20
freq, GHz
d B m ( S 1 [ 2 , : : ] )
5.199 5.201
-120
-20
freq, GHz
d B m ( S 1 [ 1 , : : ] )
N_TonesN1
PN_Type=Random PN
PhaseNoiseData=PN
RandomPhase=No
AdditionalTones=""
Phase1=0.0
Power1=.010 W
Frequency1=FCarrier MHz
TStep=50 nsec
VAR
VAR4
PN=if (AA==0) then PN0 elseif (AA==1) then PN1 else PN2 endif
PN2=" 120 -35 300 -43 3000 -63 30000 -83 300000 -103 1200000 -115"
PN1=" 120 -15 300 -23 3000 -43 30000 -63 300000 -83 1200000 -95"
PN0=" "
AA=1
EqnVar
Ideal -3dB linewidth=30Hz=0.01% of sub-carrier spacing
-3dB linewidth=3Hz=0.001% of sub-carrier spacing
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 24/30
Page 24Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 24Agilent Technologies
Effects of Oscillator Phase Noise (continued)
-1 .2
-1 . 0
- 0 . 8
- 0 . 6
- 0 .4
- 0 .2
0 . 0
0 .2
0 .4
0 . 6
0 . 8
1 . 0
1 .2
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
real(iq[0,::])
i m a g ( i q [ 0 , : : ] )
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
real(iq[1,::])
m a g
q
, : :
-1 .2
-1 . 0
- 0 . 8
- 0 . 6
- 0 .4
- 0 .2
0 . 0
0 .2
0 .4
0 . 6
0 . 8
1 . 0
1 .2
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
real(iq[2,::])
i m
a g ( i q [ 2 , : : ] )
Index
40
ReceiverEVM_pn
AA=0.000 AA=1.000 AA=2.000
1.199E-5 0.143 0.014
8 10 12 14 16 18 20
1E-5
1E-4
1E-3
1E-2
1E-1
5E-1
BER_pn.DF.CN
B E R
_ p n -3dB linewidth=30Hz
-3dB linewidth=3HzIdeal
-3dB linewidth=30Hz -3dB linewidth=3HzIdeal
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 25/30
Page 25Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 25Agilent Technologies
Effects of Fixed Point Implementation of IFFT/FFT
IQ
Modulator
IQ
Modulator
QAM
Mapping
QAM
MappingPilot
Insertion
Pilot
Insertion
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
IFFT(TX)
FFT(RX)
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
G.I.
Addition
&
Windowing
DACDAC
HPA
Remove
G.I.
Remove
G.I.Channel
Correction
Channel
Correction
LNA
AGC Amp
Rx Lev. Det.
DataIn
ADCADC
Timing &
Frequency
Synchronization
Timing &Frequency
Synchronization
QAM
Demapping
QAM
Demapping
DataOut
Frequencycorrectedsignal
Symbol Timing
FixedPointeffects
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
De-interleaving/
FEC Decoding/
De-Scrambling
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
Scrambling/
FEC Coding/
Interleaving
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 26/30
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 27/30
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 28/30
Page 28Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 28Agilent Technologies
WLAN 802.11a ADS DesignGuide –
Schematic Menu
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 29/30
Page 29Wireless Networking Design Seminar DesignGuide
November, 2001
Page 29Agilent Technologies
The Details
3 Parts:
Tutorial
Impairments
Pre-built test benches
8/3/2019 OFDM Impairments
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ofdm-impairments 30/30
Page 30Wireless Net orking Design Seminar DesignG ide Page 30Agilent Technologies
WLAN DesignGuide Example