43
September 18, 2009 Overview of Selected NETL Research National Energy Technology Laboratory www.netl.doe.gov Office of Fossil Energy Office of Research and Development Geological and Environmental Systems Dustin L. McIntyre, PhD

Office of Research and Development Geological and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Office of Research and Development Geological and

September 18, 2009

Overview of Selected NETL Research

National Energy Technology Laboratory

www.netl.doe.gov

Office of Fossil Energy

Office of Research and Development

Geological and Environmental Systems

Dustin L. McIntyre, PhD

Page 2: Office of Research and Development Geological and

2

Outline

• Brief Overview of NETL and ongoing research efforts

• X-ray CT scanning – CO2 sequestration research

• Recent Work – GeoX2010 model optimization

• Recent Work – ARMA Powder River Basin Coal

• Current Work – Carbonated brine flow in fractures

• Future Work – CO2 soluble surfactants, EOR

• New Industrial CT scanner facility

• Opportunities at NETL

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 3: Office of Research and Development Geological and

3

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 4: Office of Research and Development Geological and

4

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 5: Office of Research and Development Geological and

5

Secretary of Energy Visit 2005

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Secretary of Energy Sam Bodman

Page 6: Office of Research and Development Geological and

6

Secretary of Energy Visit 2010

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

West Virginia Senator

Jay Rockefeller

Secretary of Energy

Steven Chu

Page 7: Office of Research and Development Geological and

7

NETL’s Office of Research & Development

• Tackling important national energy problems –

– CO2 management, energy security, advanced fuels

development, hydrogen technology, hybrid cycles,

mercury capture, hydrates

• Capitalizing on unique facilities and capabilities

– History dates to early 1900’s

• Achieving breakthrough science-

– Computational science and application, hydrogen

technologies, combustion science and engineering,

sequestration mechanisms

• Achieving technology successes –

– R&D 100 awards, technology transfer awards,

publications, licenses, etc.

Page 8: Office of Research and Development Geological and

8

Research and Development Focus Areas

Page 9: Office of Research and Development Geological and

9

X-ray CT Scanning

• Nondestructive

• Experiments at Temperature and Pressure

• Identification of Areas of Interest

– Post Mortem

• Confocal Laser Microscope

• Scanning Electron Microscope

• Thin Sectioning

• Proximate Analysis

• Visualization

– Segmentation

– Time Studies

– Surfaces and Videos

• Digitization for Numerical Analysis

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 10: Office of Research and Development Geological and

10

X-ray CT Scanning

• Carbon Sequestration

– Unmineable Coal Seams

– Combined Coalbed Methane

– Combined EOR

– Brine Reservoirs

– Natural Seal Integrity

– Wellbore Seal Integrity

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 11: Office of Research and Development Geological and

11

Production from coal can be a complex

process.

• Flow through coal is defined in

large part by the cleat network.

• Methane sorbed on the coal is

released by decreasing

pressure.

• Water needs to be moved out of

cleats before gas can flow.

• CO2 injection causes reverse

process (adsorption instead of

desorption.

SORPTION DIFFUSION ADVECTION

Page 12: Office of Research and Development Geological and

12

How much CO2 can be stored (and methane

removed)?• Sorption is typically

considered to follow a

Langmuir isotherm.

• The gas pressure in the

coal seam determines

how much is sorbed to the

coal.

• CO2 is preferentially

sorbed to coal, compared

to methane.

Page 13: Office of Research and Development Geological and

13

Computed Tomography Scanning of Coal

• Computed Tomography

– 2D X-ray images reconstructed to

generate 3D volumes.

– Porosity, Permeability, Swelling

– Preferential Sorption

CT slices show density variations of coal core

Page 14: Office of Research and Development Geological and

14

Changes due to confining pressure

• Visualization

– Fractures

– Density Variations

– Saturation

– Deformation

• Most important effect is

on permeability

• Most important coal

properties for

shrinkage and swelling:

– Porosity (f)

– Young’s modulus (E)

– Poisson’s ratio (n)

Page 15: Office of Research and Development Geological and

15

Visualize Flow within Sandstone

• Visualization

– Preferential Flow

– Saturation

– Porosity

– Permeability

Page 16: Office of Research and Development Geological and

17

Image Processing of Marcellus Shale

Grey scale CT slices

CT slices with false coloring

Three-dimensional

reconstruction

Page 17: Office of Research and Development Geological and

19

Multi-scale & Multi-phase

CT Scanning

Image

Processing and

Micro-Scale CFD

Develop Flow

Relationships

Reservoir-Scale

Implementation

Page 18: Office of Research and Development Geological and

20

• GeoX 2010, 3rd International Workshop on X-ray CT

for Geomaterials, March 1-3, 2010, New Orleans

• Vary Roughness by Resampling

• Vary Aperture by Resizing

• Model Refinement

– Model Minimization and Optimization

– Computational Complexity

– Time

– Cost

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

CT Scanning and Flow Simulations

Page 19: Office of Research and Development Geological and

21

CT Scanning and Flow Simulations

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 20: Office of Research and Development Geological and

22

CT Scanning and Flow Simulations

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

• JRC provides a more linear relationship than the

Fractal Dimension

Page 21: Office of Research and Development Geological and

23

CT Scanning and Flow Simulations

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

• T follows cubic relationship fairly well above 0.7mm

aperture

Page 22: Office of Research and Development Geological and

24

44th U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium

• “Mechanical Properties, Flow Properties, and

Heterogeneous CO2 Sorption in Confined Powder

River Coal Cores” Salt Lake City Utah, June 27-30,

2010

• Sorption as a function of confining stress

• Long term sorption

• Permeability as a function of confining stress

• Mechanical Strength as a function of sorption

• Model manipulation and optimization

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 23: Office of Research and Development Geological and

September 18, 2009

Computed Tomography Analysis of Alterations

in Fractured Caprock Resulting from CO2-

acidified Brine

Brian R. Ellis

NETL Seal Integrity Group Meeting

August 10, 2010

Page 24: Office of Research and Development Geological and

26

Motivation

• Predict impact on seal integrity due to vertical

leakage of CO2-acidified brine

• Better understand conditions that will lead to self-

sealing or continued dissolution

Page 25: Office of Research and Development Geological and

27

Secondary Seal: Fine-grained LS/DS

Primary Seal: Cherty Dolostone

CO2 inj.

well

Injection

Formation

Site Selection – Michigan MRCSP Injection

Well

Amherstburg

Bois BlancBass Island

Injection Formation: Dolostone

Page 26: Office of Research and Development Geological and

28

Sample Preparation

• 1” diameter, vertical core subsample

taken from injection well core

• Core fracture was artificially induced

Page 27: Office of Research and Development Geological and

29

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Page 28: Office of Research and Development Geological and

30

ISCO

Pump

ISC

O

Pum

p

H2O

or

Oil

CO

2

Gas/Liqui

d

Separator

CO2 vent

pH probe

Check valve

Thermocouple

Brine

Pressure transducer

Pressure gauge

2-way shut-off valve

BP

R

1450 psi

15 psi

Experimental Design

Page 29: Office of Research and Development Geological and

31

BPR, L/G

separator and

union cross for pH

probes

Mixing Vessel

at 30° angle to

increase surface

area contact

Core holder

inlet side

Confining

pressure and

injection pumps

Page 30: Office of Research and Development Geological and

32

CT Scanner

CT scanning during

active flow-through at

temperature and

pressure

Page 31: Office of Research and Development Geological and

33

Starting Brine Composition

Species [mol/L]

Na 1.00 x 100

Ca 4.63 x 10-2

Mg 1.86 x 10-2

Cl 1.00 x 100

SO4 2.36 x 10-2

Sr 1.00 x 10-4

CO2(aq) 1.07 x 100

pH 4.86

Representative of 1 M NaCl

brine having previously

reacted with injection

formation minerals under

CO2-saturated conditions –

near equilibrium with

Calcite, Dolomite, and

Anhydrite

• Temperature = 40°C

• CO2 pressure = 1450 psi

• Confining pressure = 2000 psi

• Flow rate = 10 ml min-1

Page 32: Office of Research and Development Geological and

34

CT Scanning Results

Page 33: Office of Research and Development Geological and

35

Day 2

Day 7

Medical Scanner CT Resolution = 250 μm

Outlet end of core

Inlet end of core

Top 1/3

Middle 1/3

Bottom 1/3

Page 34: Office of Research and Development Geological and

36

Micro-CT Imaging2-D slice of top 1/3 of core – Prior to CO2-brine flow

Micro CT Resolution = 27 μm

2-D slice of top 1/3 of core – After 1 week of CO2-brine

flow

Page 35: Office of Research and Development Geological and

37

2-D slice of middle 1/3 of core – Prior to CO2-brine flow

2-D slice of middle 1/3 of core – After 1 week of CO2-

brine flow

Page 36: Office of Research and Development Geological and

38

1 mm

2 mm

2-D slice of bottom 1/3 of core – After 1 week of CO2-

brine flow

2-D slice of bottom 1/3 of core – Prior to CO2-brine flow

Page 37: Office of Research and Development Geological and

39

Continued Analysis

• SEM/EDS analysis of sectioned core

– Sr-substitued calcite precipication?

– Investigate extent and location of mineral dissolution

along fracture pathway

• ICP-AES analysis of brine effluent

• Estimation of aperture change over time and the

corresponding change in fracture volume

Page 38: Office of Research and Development Geological and

40

Acknowledgements

• Dr. Catherine A. Peters

• Dr. Grant Brohmal

• Dr. Dustin McIntyre

• Dr. Hema Siriwardane

• Dr. Jinesh Jain

• Dr. Bob Warzinski

• Dr. Dustin Crandell

• Eilis Rosenbaum

• Bryan Tennant

• Karl Jarvis

Funding Support

• ORISE

• Department of

Energy Under

Award Number DE-

FE0000749

Page 39: Office of Research and Development Geological and

41

Future Facilities and Work

• Microfocus X-ray CT facility

– 30” x 48” Scanning Envelope

– 5 micron Resolution (small samples)

– 225 kV and 320 kV Sources

• Carbon Sequestration

– Seal Interaction with Carbonated Brine

• Natural and Wellbore (Cement) Seals

• Strength

• Mineralization

• Open/Close Pathways

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 40: Office of Research and Development Geological and

42

Custom Industrial CT Scanner

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 41: Office of Research and Development Geological and

43

Visualization of Coal

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 42: Office of Research and Development Geological and

44

Future High Resolution Industrial CT Facility

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118

Page 43: Office of Research and Development Geological and

45

NETL Opportunities

• Proposal Solicitations through Project Management

Center

• Federal Employee

• URS Contractor Employee

• ORISE Student

• Regional University Alliance (RUA)

– CMU, PSU, WVU, Pitt, VT

• Minority Mentoring Internship Program (MMIP)

• Student Career Experience Program (SCEP)

• Mickey Leyland Internship Program

Paper # FEDSM2009 – 78118