REPORT FROM

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Date: September 29, 2009 CAO File No.Council File No.Council District:

0220-01024-267609-0560All

To: The MayorThe Council

From: Miguel A. Santana, City Administrative OfficJ2>~

Reference: Community Development Department Transmittal dated August 27, 2009; Received by the CityAdministrative Officer on September 4, 2009;

Subject: SELECTION OF FAMILYSOURCE CENTER OPERATORS AND EVALUATIONCONTRACTOR - AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT AND OTHER FUNDS

SUMMARY

In May 2009, the Council and Mayor authorized the Community Development Department (CDD) to issue aRequest for Proposals (RFP) to select nonprofit service providers as Lead Agencies to coordinate and operate16 FamilySource Centers (FSC) (C.F. 09-0560) throughout the City and an agency or agencies to providesystem-wide Technical Assistance and Program Evaluation services. The selected contractors will providehuman development services, program evaluation, and data collection tools in support of the City's HumanServices Delivery System (HSDS). The scope of work for the RFP is provided as Attachment 1 to this report.

The CDD requests authority to negotiate and execute 17 contracts with 15 FSC Lead Agencies for the 16 FSCsites and one Program Evaluation provider, subject to certification of 15 of the proposed service providers as aCommunity Based Development Organization (CBDO), available funds, the review and approval of the CityAttomey as to form and legality and compliance with the City's contracting policies. The proposed contract termis six months effective October 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010, with the option to renew for two additionalone-year terms for a total amount of $8.12 million. The proposed contractors are as follows:

FamilySource Center Site/Target Area Proposed Contractor (Lead Agency)

Boyle HeightsCanoga ParkEcho ParkHollywoodLincoln HeightsNorth ValleySouth ValleySoutheast ISoutheast IISouthwest ISouthwest IIWattsWest Los AngelesWestlake/Pico UnionWilmington/San PedroWilshire

EI Centro De Ayuda CorporationNew Economics for WomenEI Centro Del PuebloYouth Policy InstituteBarrio Action Youth and Family CenterEI Nido Family CentersNew Economics for WomenThe Children's CollectiveCoalition of Mental Health Professionals1736 Family Crisis CenterCommunity Build, Inc.Watts Labor Community Action CommitteeCommunity Care at HomeCentral City Neighborhood PartnersToberman Neighborhood Center, Inc.Oakwood Family Resource Center

CAO File No.

0220-01024-2676PAGE

2

Service Proposed Contractor

System Support - Evaluation ServiceThe University Corporation,California State University Northridge

The six- month contract amount is not to exceed $500,000 for each FSC and $125,000 for the ProgramEvaluation provider. Each Lead Agency will collaborate with other nonprofit organizations to provide services atthe FSC site or in close proximity to the site. A list of the subcontractors for the proposed Lead Agencies isprovided as Attachment 2 to this report.

Of the $8.12 million in total funding for these contracts, $4.74 million is available in the Community DevelopmentBlock Grant (CDBG), $2.48 million in 2009 Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) and anticipated 2010CSBG allocations, $500,000 in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) CSBG funds and $400,000from Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) Miscellaneous Revenue.

The ss" Year Consolidated Plan (2009-10) provided funding to continue human services with the existingservice providers for six months effective April 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009. The CDD requestsapproval for an initial term of six months for the proposed contracts addressed in this report to align the term ofthese contracts with that of the Program Year for the Consolidated Plan, which runs from April 1, 2009 throughMarch 31, 2010.

Community Action Board

The CDD presented the proposed service providers and funding recommendations to the Community ActionBoard (CAB) on August 13, 2009. The CAB serves as an advisory board to Council and Mayor regarding issuesrelating to the CDBG and CSBG. The CAB Appeals Board voted to approve 15 of the 16 service providersselected by CDD through the RFP process. The Board voted to not recommend funding for the Southeast IIarea due to the Board's concems regarding the selected provider, Coalition of Mental Health Professionals'(CMHP) capacity to deliver the services. The CDD states that CMHP achieved the highest score in the area(72 points). To address the CAB's concern, the CDD will require a review of the contractor's financialstatements prior to the execution of a contract and require that CMHP set aside a minimum of $40,000 forParticipant Related Costs. The CDD will also provide monthly site visits and technical assistance to thecontractor.

Other Implementation Requests

The CDD also requests authority to establish a FSC Operator Replacement list (List) for a period of three years,effective October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2012. In the event that the original service provider cannotdeliver proposed services at a satisfactory level, the CDD requests authority to negotiate contracts with otherproposers on the List, subject to Council and Mayor approval. The ability to maintain a List will reduce the timeand expense that is required to issue a new RFP to replace a service provider. The List includes the FSCproposals that received a minimum evaluation score of 70 points as follows:

Target Area Proposer (Lead Agency) Score (100 Points maximum)

Boyle HeightsNorth ValleyS~th Valley .....

co ~ IES~the~1 0Saathwe.st I

M >-Q... I-~ ~

~ iii

Girls Today Women Tomorrowyouth Policy InstituteCommunity Care at HomeYouth Policy InstituteInitiating Change in Our NeighborhoodsWeingart Center AssociationYouth Policy InstituteLos Angeles Brotherhood Crusade, Inc.

7884838379838174

CAO File No.

0220-01024-2676PAGE

3

Target Area Proposer (Lead Agency) Score (100 Points maximum)

West Los AngelesWilmington/San PedroWilshire

1736 Family Crisis Center1736 Family Crisis CenterKoreatown Youth & Community CenterNew Economics for Women

86888583

The COO also requests authority to negotiate agreements with the proposed Lead Agencies that require theLead Agencies to execute sub-agreements with organizations that can provide services to Asian Pacific Islanderpopulations. The COD states that this population has historically been undeserved by the COD's HSDS. TheCOO will target the South Valley, Lincoln Heights and Hollywood areas. The RFP allows the COO to negotiateadjustments to proposals on an offer/counter offer basis as necessary.

The COO further requests authority to execute contracts with three public accounting firms for audit andaudit-related services for up to $100,000 per contract. The COO solicited proposals for professional servicesand selected these contractors in September 2008. Audit services are a requirement of the CDBG, CSBG andWorkforce Investment Act (WIA) grants to ensure that the use of funds comply with grant regulations. Theselected contractors are Qui Accountancy Corporation, Simpson and Simpson, CPAs and Thompson, Cobb,Bazilio and Associates, P.C. The COO will complete the requirements of Charter Section 1022 and comply withall City contracting policies prior to the execution of the contracts. Funding for these contracts is available fromCOBG and the WIA Year 10 Annual Plan (C.F. 09-1423).

In addition, the COO states that a provider for System Support -Technical Assistance was not selected. Thesingle proposal that was submitted pursuant to the RFP did not achieve the minimum score of 70 points. TheCOO states that a new RFP may be issued for this service.

Background

The new HSDS was proposed by COO in February 2009 (C.F.09-0560) and establishes 21 FSCs located inareas in the City with high concentrations of poverty. The previous HSOS was initiated in 1999 and comprised ofFamily Development Networks (FON) with 12 Lead agencies and 72 Neighborhood Action Program agencies(NAP) and Specially Targeted Programs (STP) located throughout the City. The 21 FSCs are located in areasthat are similar to those served by the previous FDNs and in an expanded area in the south and southwest ofthe City in which no services were previously provided. The COO operated five centers as Youth and FamilyCenters. The COD will continue to manage these centers as FSC. The remaining 16 FSCs were subject to thisRFP process.

The COD issued an RFP on August 11, 2009 for Specialized Services for the FamilySource Program (FSP) toavoid a gap in services that were previously provided by FDNs, NAPs and STPs and that will augment theservices that are provided by the FSCs. The RFP will solicit proposals from existing NAP and STP contractorswith contracts that expire on September 30, 2009. The specialized services will include services to persons withdisabilities and chlldcare services. Approximately $2.5 million in CSBG ARRA funds is available for thesecontracts. The COD is in the process of evaluating the submitted proposals.

Request for Proposal and Selection Process

Scope of Services

The RFP solicited qualified entities to operate one or more of the FSCs to deliver integrated, comprehensivehuman development services to City residents. Lead proposers were required to identify a minimum ofleveraged resources that equate to 10 percent of the funding level that is requested for adult education services.All FSCs were required to provide services to the disabled community. Agencies that are Community BasedDevelopment Organizations or the can be certified as COBOs were encouraged to apply to allow the City to

CAO File No.

0220-01024-2676PAGE

4

maximize grant funding. All FSCs will offer universal access services to all City residents. In addition, casemanagement will be available to low income families with children aged 16 years and under with the goal ofmoving these families from poverty to economic self-sufficiency.

The System Support (Program Evaluation and Technical Assistance) RFP solicited qualified entities to providesupport services which include program evaluation and technical assistance to enable or increase the FSP'scapacity to serve clients with disabilities, standardizing client assessment and case management tools, and datacollection to comply with grant requirements. The selected provider will be required to develop an evaluationsystem and customer satisfaction survey for the FSC sites by April 1, 2010.

Selection Process

The COO released the RFP on May 27, 2009 with a submission deadline of July 7, 2009. Notice of the RFPwaspublished in 17 publications, on COD's Intemet site and on the Los Angeles Business Assistance VirtualNetwork. The COD conducted four Proposer Conferences in June 2009 in the Boyle Heights, Watts, Pacoimaand in the Civic Center areas. Thirty-eight proposals were received by the submission deadline: 35 FSCproposals, two Program Evaluation proposals and one Technical Assistance proposal. Two FSC proposals werereceived after the deadline.

The selection process consisted of a first-level review by COD staff for minimum eligibility. The second-levelreviews were conducted by three-member panels selected from 17 rating teams. The rating teams werecomprised of COD staff and outside raters that were recruited from public and private agencies. The ratingteams ranked the applicants based on three evaluation factors: demonstrated ability, program design andapproach, and cost reasonableness. A fourth evaluation factor, (site visit) was required for the FSC applicants.The rating teams selected 15 FSC operators (one operator was selected to operate two FSCs) and oneProgram Evaluation provider that received the highest overall score in the specific category. The single proposalfor Technical Assistance services was not selected as the proposal did not meet the minimum qualifying scoreof 70 points. All applicants were notified of the results of the RFP on August 4,2009.

Appeals Process

Non-selected applicants were informed of their right to appeal. In addition, COD staff scheduled meetings withall non-selected applicants to assist them with questions regarding the scores and appeals process. Nineappeals from the following proposers were received by the deadline of August 11, 2009:

FamilySource Center Site Proposer

North ValleySouth ValleySouth ValleySoutheast I and IIWest Los AngelesWilmington/San PedroWilshireWilshire

youth Policy InstituteYouth Policy InstituteInitiating Change in Our Neighborhoods, CDCWeingart Center Association1736 Family Crisis Center1736 Family Crisis CenterKorean Youth and Community CenterOakwood Family Resource Center

Service Proposer

System Support - EvaluationService

Research for Strategic Management

Four members of the CAB served as the Appeals Board for the RFP. The appeals were considered onAugust 17 and 24, 2009. The COD prepared written responses to the appeals and responded to questions at

CAO File No.

0220-01024-2676PAGE

5

the meetings. The appellants were offered an opportunity to make oral presentations to the Board. The Boardvoted to award additional points to four of the nine applicants. The additional points did not change the originalfunding recommendations. The Board voted to approve the COD funding recommendations, as amended by theBoard and forwarded their recommendations to the Council for consideration. Applicants will be provided anopportunity for public comment in Council.

We recommend approval of the 15 service providers to operate 16 of the 21 FSCs and one service provider toprovide Program Evaluation services. We recommended approval of the authority for COD to negotiate andexecute contracts with the proposed service providers, for a term of six months and a total amount not toexceed $8.25 million, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality andcornpliance with the City's contracting requirements. We also recommend authority for COD to establish a FSCOperator Replacement list for a period of three years, effective October 1, 2009 through Septernber 30, 2012,negotiate with the proposed Lead Agencies of the FSCs to execute sub-agreements with organizations that canprovide services to Asian Pacific Islander populations and execute contracts with three public accounting firmsfor audit and audit-related services for up to $100,000 per contract, subject to compliance with the City'scontracting requirements including completion of Charter Section 1022 requirements and review and approval ofthe City s to form and legality.

The recomrnendations of this report are in compliance with City Financial Policies in that ongoing federal andstate funds are available for the proposed contracts. Additional information on the selection of the serviceproviders, the evaluation criteria and the appeals process is provided in a transmittal frorn COD, dated August27, 2009 which is available on the City's Internet website, www.cityclerk.lacity.org/Councii File ManagementSystem (C.F.09-0560). The HSDS redesign is in conjunction with the proposed reorganization of COD.Additional information on the HSDS redesign and COD's reorganization is provided in COD's correspondencedated August 18, 2009 (C.F.09-0560-S1) and on COD's internet website www.lacity.org/cdd.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the Council, subject to the approval of the Mayor:

1. Approve the results of the 2009 FamilySource Centers Operators (FSC) and System Support - ProgramEvaluation Request for Proposals (RFP) issued on May 27, 2009;

2. Authorize the General Manager, Community Development Department (COD), or designee, to negotiateand execute 16 contracts with 15 Lead Agencies to provide human services and work developmentservices at 16 FamilySource Centers (FSC), substantially in conformance with the scope of work discussedin the RFP and Attachrnent 1 of this report. The proposed contract terrn is effective October 1, 2009through March 31,2010 with an option to renew for two additional one-year terms. The proposed contractsare subject to the certification of 15 of the 17 recommended proposers as a Cornmunity BasedDevelopment Organization, based on funding availability, City contracting requirements, and the review ofthe City Attorney as to form and legality. The proposed contract amount is not to exceed $500,000 per FSCfor a six-month for a total amount of $8,000,000 from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG),Community Services Block Grant (CSBG), CSBG-American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), andUrban Development Action Grant (UDAG) Miscellaneous Revenue as follows:

FamilySource Pro~osed ContractorCenter Site (Lead Aaencv) Fundina Source Fundina Amount

Bovle Heichts EI Centro De Avuda Corooration" CDBG $331,621CSBG 168,379

Canoqa Park New Economics for Women* CDBG 50,000CSBG-ARRA 250,000UDAG 200,000

CAO File No.

0220-01024-2676PAGE

6

FamilllSource ProQosed Contractor FundingCenter Site (Lead Anencv) Amount Fundina Source

.

Echo Park EI Centro Del Pueblo* CDBG $331,621CSBG 168,379

Hollywood Youth Policy Institute* CDBG 331,621CSBG 168,379

Barrio Action Youth and FamilyLincoln Helohts Center' CDBG 331,621

CSBG 168,379North Vallev EI Nido Familv Centers CDBG 331,621

CSBG 168,379South Valley New Economics for Women' CDBG 331,621

CSBG 168,379Southeast I The Children's Collective' CDBG 331,621

CSBG 168,379Coalition of Mental Health

Southeast II Professionals* CDBG 331,621CSBG 168,379

Southwest I 1736 Familv Crisis Center' CDBG 331,621CSBG 168,379

Southwest II Communitv Build, Inc! CDBG 331,621CSBG 168,379

Watts Labor Community ActionWatts Committee* CDBG 331,621

CSBG 168,379West Los Anaeles Communitv Care at Home' CDBG 50,000

CSBG-ARRA 250,000UDAG 200,000

Westlake/ Central City NeighborhoodPico Union Partners' CDBG 331,621

CSBG 168,379Wilmington/ Toberman Neighborhood Center,San Pedro Inc! CDBG 331,621

CSBG 168,379Wilshire Oakwood Familv Resource Center' CDBG 331,621

CSBG 168379Total <1:<> nnn nnn

* CSDO certification required

3. Approve the selection of The University Corporation, California State University Northridge to provideProgram Evaluation services that include client assessment and development of an evaluation system forthe FSCs and FamilySource Program activities substantially in conformance with the scope of workdiscussed in the RFP and Attachment 1 of this report, subject to funding availability, compliance with Citycontracting requirements and review of the City Attorney as to form and legality. The proposed contractterm is effective October 1, 2009 through March 31,2010 with an option to renew for two additionalone-year terms and a contract amount not to exceed $125,000;

CAO File No,

0220-01024-2676PAGE

7

4, Authorize the General Manager CCO, or designee, to establish a FSC Operator Replacement List asdetailed in this report for the period of three years commencing October 1, 2009 throughSeptember 30,2012 to include any FSC proposal receiving a score of 70 points or greater, but notrecommended for funding as a result of the 2009 FSC RFP, and instruct the General Manager, COO ordesignee, to report back to the City Council before the negotiation and execution of contracts with any ofthe agencies on the said list;

5, Authorize the General Manager, COO, or designee, to negotiate with FSC Lead Agencies to executefinancial SUb-agreements with organizations that have experience serving the Asian Pacific Islander (API)community, The COO will target the South Valley, Lincoln Heights and Hollywood areas;

6, Authorize the General Manager COO, or designee, to negotiate with Qiu Accountancy Corporation,Simpson and Simpson, CPAs and Thompson, Cobb, Basilio and Associates, P,C, for audits and auditrelated services of various grant sources that were approved in previous Council and Mayor actions for anamount not to exceed $100,000 and a contract term retroactive from April 1,2009 through March 31,2009,with the option to renew for two additional one-year terms, subject to the review and approval of the City asto form and legality and compliance with the City's contracting requirements, Funding is available fromCOBG, CSBG and Workforce Investment Act;

7, Authorize the Controller to:

a, Expend $3,981,809 from Account F304 CBOO-HSOS within COBG Fund 424;

b. Expend $760,895 from Account F303 Redesign HSDS within CDBG Fund 424;

c. Establish Account F301 FamilySource Program and appropriate $1 ,313,401 within CSBG Fund 428;

d. Establish Account F401 FamilySource Program and appropriate $1,293,895 within CSBG Fund 428;

e, Expend $500,000 from Account F501 FamilySource Program within CSBG ARRA Fund 51 H;

f. Establish Account F300 FamilySource program and appropriate $400,000 within UDAG Fund 356;and;

8, Authorize the General Manager CDD, or designee, to prepare any Controller's instructions needed toimplement actions approved by the Council and Mayor on matters presented in or deriving from thistransmittal, and/or to make necessary technical adjustments, subject to the approval of the CityAdministrative Officer; and further, request that the Controller implement these instructions,

FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT

There is no impact on the General Fund, The recommendations comply with City Financial Policies in that thefull cost for proposed contractual services for FamilySource Program services is available from ongoing federaland state grant awards, including but not limited to Community Development Block Grant, Community ServicesBlock Grant (CSBG), Urban Development Action Grant Miscellaneous Revenue, CSBG-American Recovery andReinvestment Act and other eligible grant sources.

MAS:BL T:021 00046

Attachments

Attachment 1C.F.09-0560

PROPOSED FAMIL YSOURCE CENTERSScope of Work

The scope of work solicited under the Request For Proposals (RFP) falls under two distinct categories:1) provision of direct client services at FamilySource Centers or 2) provision of expert technicalassistance for the entire FamilySource Program as "system support".

1. FamilySource Center Core Services

The FamilySource Program will serve at minimum 50,000 low-income clients on an annual basis.Clients may receive services either as universal access clients or case-managed clients. Atminimum, FamilySource Program contractors must provide information and referral, multi-benefitscreening, and access to a community resource room. Table 1 provides an overview of minimumcore services required at the FamilySource Centers.

Table1: FamilySource Center Core Service Requirements

--

Required Goals/Core Services FamilySource Center

Minimum # of Clients to be Served 360 Case Managed Clients &2,240 Universal Access Clients

Multi-benefit Screening Required

Information & Referral Required

Case Management Required

Pre-Employment! RequiredEmolovrnent Support

Child Care! Parenting Classes RequiredI

Financial Literacy! Money Management RequiredEducationAdult Education (at minimum GED & Required Leveraged ResourceESL)

Services for Persons with Disabilities Required

Computer Literacy Required

Tutoring (Youth) Required

Mentoring (Youth) Required

Youth Leadership Required

Cash for College! College Access RequiredActivitiesRecreational Activities! Cultural Activities Required(Youth)

Supportive Services! Legal Services . Required-

1

Attachment 1C.F.09-0560

2. System Support Services

The selected service provider is required to provide system support services in ProgramEvaluation the following areas:

• Evaluate the performance of all FamilySource Centers on an annual basis in accordancewith the City's Certification Policy. The Policy requires contractors to be successful in thefollowing categories in order to be eligible for continued funding:

1. Customer satisfaction - as formally measured through on-site and follow-upcustomer satisfaction surveys.

2. Administrative Capability - as measured through formal monitoring and fiscalreviews of contractor administrative and fiscal practices.

3. Outcomes - as measured by contractor success in meeting increased familyincome and academic achievement goals.

4. Flow - as measured by the volume of individuals availing of services at eachFamilySource Center

• Evaluate providers on a monthly basis against a "system" scorecard that measures theprogress not only of contractor performance but that of CDD in administering the grant.

• Review and modify the existing Certification Policy to ensure that it captures theinformation necessary for an objective evaluation of contractor performance. This willrequire the collection of input from both contractor and City staff and will be due withinthree months of execution of an agreement with the City.

• Prepare the initial six-month evaluation of contractor performance for the period ofOctober 1,2009 to March 31,2010 and the subsequent annual evaluation for the periodof April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011.

• Develop methodology for evaluating customer satisfaction, conducting the actual surveysand compiling and presenting results for incorporation into the annual performanceevaluation. This will also be due within three months of contract execution.

• Present performance evaluation results to the Community Action Board and/or CityCouncil.

• Develop methodology for evaluating the success of the FamilySource Program. At aminimum, the evaluation should consider the performance of the new program againstthe current Human Services Delivery System, the benefit of the Center based model tothe community and the return on investment. The methodology will be due within fourmonths of contract execution.

• The preparation of an initial six-month progress report for the period of October 1, 2009to March 31,2010; and,

• The preparation of an ts-month report for the period of October 1, 2009 toMarch 31, 2011.

MAS:BLT:02100046

2

Attachment 2C.F. 09·0560

PROPOSED FAMIL YSOURCE CENTERS (FSC)AND SUBCONTRACTORS

TARGET AREA LEAD AGENCY AND SUB CONTRACTORS FSC LOCATION.

Boyle Heights EI Centro de Ayuda Corporation 3467 Whittier Blvd.1. Salesian Boys & Girls Club of LA Los Angeles, CA 900232. Plaza Community Services3. LA Center for LA & Justice4. Lincoln Height Tutorial Program5. Plaza de la Raza

Canoga Park New Economics for Women 21400 Saticoy SI.1. EI Centro de Amistad Canoga Park, CA 913052. EI Nido Family Centers3. Neighborhood Legal Services4. New Directions for Youth5. Independent l.ivino Center of Southern California

Echo Park EI Centro del Pueblo 1157 Lemoyne1. 826 L.A. Los Angeles, CA 900262. Inquilinos Unidos3. Search to Involve Pilipino Americans (SIPA)4. Salvadoran American Leadership and Educational Fund5. Chinatown Service Center6. Elvslan Vallev United

Hollywood Youth Policy Institute 815 N. EI Centro Ave.1. Hollygrove Los Angeles, Ca 900382. Los Angeles Valley College Foundation3. UCLACBL4. Bet Tzedek5. Salvadoran American Leadershio and Educational Fund

Lincoln Heights Barrio Action Youth and Family Center 4927 Huntington Drive North,1. Lincoln Heights Boys and Girls Club Suite 2002. Hillsides Los Angeles, CA 900323. Lincoln Heights Tutorial Program4. Los Angeles Center for Law and Justice5. Plaza de la Raza

North Valley EI Nido Family Centers 13460 Van Nuys Blvd.1. Meet Each Need with Dignity Pacoima, CA 913312. Neighborhood Legal Services3. Pacoima Beautiful4. Tia Chucha's Centro Cultural5. Woodcraft Ranoers

South Valley New Economics for Women 6931·6939 Van Nuys Blvd.1. EI Centro de Amistad Van Nuys, CA 914052. EI Nido Family Centers3. Neighborhood Legal Services4. New Directions for Youth5. Indeoendent Livina Center of Southern California

Southeast I The Children's Collective, Inc. 2805 S. San Pedro SI.1. Coalition of Mental Health Professionals, Inc. Los Angeles, CA 900112. Hurting and Hungry SSG3. National Family Life and Education Center4. Woodcraft Rangers5. EI Nido Family Centers6. 1736 Familv Crisis Center

1

Attachment 2C.F. 09-0560

TARGET AREA PROPOSED FAMIL YSOURCE CENTERS (FSC) LEAD FSC LOCATIONAGENCY AND SUB CONTRACTORS

Southeast II Coalition of Mental Health Professionals, Inc. 9219 S. Broadway Ave.1. Children Youth and Family Collaborative Los Angeles, CA 900032. Brotherhood Crusade3. Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles4. 1736 Family Crisis Center5. Communitv Build

Southwest I 1736 Family Crisis Center 2116 Arlington Ave., Suite 2001. Children's Bureau Los Angeles, CA 900182. Challengers Boys & Girls Club3. Community Financial Resource Center4. Jeffrey Foundation5. Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles6. Public Counsel7. John's Well Child & Family Clinic8. Strateaic Actions for a Just Economv

Southwest II Community Build, Inc. 8730 S. Vermont Ave.1. People Coordinated Services of So. California Los Angeles, CA 900442. 1736 Family Crisis Center3. Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles4. Foundation for Successful Solutions5. Friend Outside of LA County

Watts Watts Labor Community Action Committee 958 E. 108m SI.1. Girls Club of Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 900592. Legal Aid Foundation3. Friends Outside of LA County4. Project Impact5. EI Nido Familv Centers

West LA Community Care at Home 5075 S. Slauson Ave.1. Mar Vista Family Center Los Angeles, CA 902302. SI. Joseph's Center3. Jewish Vocational Services4. Latino Resource Organization5. Boys and Girls Club of Venice6. Westside Center for Living7. Venice Family Clinic8. Legal Aid Foundation

Westlake! Central City Neighborhood Partners 501 S. Bixel StreetPico Union 1. CARECEN Los Angeles, CA 90017

2. Clinica Msr. Oscar Romero3. Inner City Law Center4. Little Tokyo Center5. New Economics for Women6. Search to Involve Pilipino Americans (SIPA)7. Sunrise Community Counseling Center8. UCLA Community Based Learning9. Youth Policy Institute

Wilmington! Toberman Neighborhood Center, Inc. 131 North Grand Ave.San Pedro 1. Catholic Charities San Pedro, CA 90731

2. YWCA3. Boys & Girls Club of South Bay4. Public Counsel5. Gana Alternative Proararn (GAP)

2

Attachment 2C.F. 09·0560

TARGET AREA PROPOSED FAMIL YSOURCE CENTERS (FSC) LEAD FSC LOCATIONAGENCY AND SUB CONTRACTORS

Wilshire Oakwood Family Resource Center 3910 Oakwood Ave.1. P.F. Bresee Foundation Los Angeles, CA 900042. Korean Churches for Community Development (KCCD)3. South Bay Center for Counseling4. Legal Aid Foundation of LA5. Children's Bureau of Southern California6. Familv Resource Library

MAS:BLT:021000046

3