Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line.
Ofgem’s review of Xoserve’s Funding, Governance and Ownership (FGO)
Transmission Workgroup – June 2015 Seán McGoldrick
Xoserve
Background and Current Arrangements
Background ¾ Established as a limited
company on May 1st, 2005. ¾ Facilitated Distribution
Network (DN) Sales ¾ Designed to provide
transactional services to the industry on behalf of Gas Transporters – “The Transporters’ Agent”
¾ Ownership and Management of UK Link suite of systems
¾ Management of NTS’ Gemini system (remains under NTS Ownership)
3
Current Arrangements
4
Shareholders / Xoserve Board Members
NTS NGD SGN NGN WWU
Xoserve
NTS GDNs
Shippers Other industry parties
Service Providers
National Grid
Framework agreements with Offshore Development companies for IS services
General Service Agreement between National Grid and Xoserve
Shareholder Agreement
Agency Service Agreement (ASA)
ASA Funding
Uniform Network Code (UNC)
Formula and Code User Pays Revenue
Non-Code User Pays conditions
Non-Code User Pays revenue
Xoserve
Why FGO?
6
Stakeholder feedback
¾ Ofgem received a number of comments relating to Xoserve: ¾ Need more cost transparency
¾ “Gold-Plated” solutions v Always goes for the least-cost option
¾ More industry engagement needed
¾ Change Black Box.
¾ CEPA review carried out
¾ Industry-wide workshops held looking at identifying desired enhancements to Xoserve’s FGO arrangements
¾ Cooperative Business Model recommended
Xoserve
Future design options
8
Ofgem’s conclusions
¾ Xoserve to become the Gas Industry’s “Central Data Service Provider” (CDSP).
¾ The Scope of central data services provided by the CDSP is to be kept whole
¾ GTs costs for Central Data Services will be recoverable via “Pass Through” mechanism
¾ Central Data Service requirements will be subject to cross-industry governance
¾ Service outputs and funding requirements will be determined through industry-facing business planning processes, ratified by the CDSP Board.
9
Ofgem’s conclusions
¾ Central Data Services will be provided on a not-for-profit basis
¾ The CDSP Board will be reconstituted to include both GT and Shipper nominated members
¾ Xoserve to retain the latitude to develop / provide additional services
¾ DNs and NTS to continue to hold shares in Xoserve
¾ Ownership and Control separated.
¾ Target go-live date is April 1, 2016.
CDSP Funding Options
¾ Reallocation of CDSP costs to each party based on stake in the service
¾ GT costs recoverable via Pass Through
¾ Remove from RIIO
¾ Agree annual business plan
¾ Costs will only change in exceptional circumstances
¾ Ofgem approval required
¾ Carry-over to subsequent FY
¾ Invoicing mechanism TBD.
10
Potential realignment of control / obligation
11
Supply Point Capacity
Registration
Supply Point Shipper
Registration
Provide Query Management
Record / Submit data in
compliance with the UNC
Facilitate DN Interruption
Auction
Metered Volume and Quantity
DM Supply Point Capacity and
Offtake Review
Annual Quantity Reviews
Transportation Invoices
Balancing Invoices
User Administration
and Termination CSEPs NExA Supply
Meterpoints
Generation of Supply Point
Meter Reference Number
Emergency Contact
Information
Shipper Agreed reads
Provision of information to
registered Metering
applicants
Energy Balancing Demand Estimation
User Pays and non-code services
Theft and iGT exchanges Meter Notices
Provision of information and
Agency Management
Gemini Capacity Booking
Gemini – Imbalance Settlement
UK-Link Services Provision of User
reports and information
Network and User relationship management
Data flows and services to
Network Operators
User Pays Code services
Shippers
Shippers & DNs (& iGTs)
DNs (& iGTs)
National Grid NTS
DNs & NTS (& iGTs)
All
CDSP Funding Options Current cost apportionment Future cost allocation
(example only)
12
NGGT, 11%
DNs, 89%
NGGT
DNs
iGTs
Shipper1
Shipper 2
Shipper 3
.
.
.
.
¾ Need to close down current funding and financing arrangements at point of switch over to new model
¾ Need to ensure new arrangements provide for an enduring financial model.
Changes to governance
¾ Introduction of Cross-industry governance for:
¾ Change Management
¾ Build annual change workplan
¾ Consider F&A work
¾ Performance management
¾ Contract Management
¾ Operational Service KPI management
¾ Ongoing management of control / costs. 13
NTS GDNs Shippers
New Contractual Arrangements
iGTs
CDSP
Ownership impacts
¾ GTs to retain Ownership
¾ CDSP to become a “Not-for-profit” organisation
¾ Xoserve to be de-risked in event of failure of the CDSP
¾ GT and Shipper membership of the Board
¾ Exact composition TBD
¾ Constituency nomination
¾ Ofgem to have “step-in” powers. 14
S1
DNs
S3
iGTs
S2
Tx
CDSP Board
Central Data Service Provider
Current activities
Development of CDSP Blueprint
¾ Initial Workgroups being held
¾ Obligations
¾ Governance
¾ Business Plan & Budget Setting
¾ Monthly POBs scheduled
¾ Development workgroups being scheduled now
¾ Transition: Understanding what can / cannot be delivered in time for April 2016
¾ Development of plans for subsequent roll-out / formalisation of remaining functions.
16
What’s needed from you?
¾ Keep up to date with progress
¾ Regular update from FGO Programme Manager
¾ Contribute to informal & formal consultations
¾ Input to development workgroups
¾ Only National Grid Transmission attending on behalf of Tx sector
17
Transmission Stakeholders
The FGO Programme needs YOU
Questions?
18
? Vrae
Pyetjet األسئلة
հարցեր
سواالت
galderak
пытанняў
p"
pitanja
सवालो ंके जवाब
preguntes
问题
otázkyspørgsmål
vragen
imibuzo שאלות cwestiynau
câu hỏi
سواالت کے
питань
คำถาม
spurningar
질문
frågor
ਸਵਾਲ ceisteanna
quaestiones
въпроси
ερωτήσεις
tanong