58
1 Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study Draft Final Report 17 November 2016 Principal Investigator: Ryan S. King Professor, Department of Biology Baylor University Waco, TX 76798 www.baylor.edu/aquaticlab Joint Study Committee Members: Brian Haggard; Co-Chair (University of Arkansas) Marty Matlock (University of Arkansas) Ryan Benefield (Arkansas Natural Resources Commission) Derek Smithee; Co-Chair (Oklahoma Water Resources Board) Shellie Chard (Oklahoma Dept. of Environmental Quality) Shanon Philips (Oklahoma Conservation Commission)

Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

1

Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study Draft Final Report 17 November 2016 Principal Investigator: Ryan S. King Professor, Department of Biology Baylor University Waco, TX 76798 www.baylor.edu/aquaticlab Joint Study Committee Members: Brian Haggard; Co-Chair (University of Arkansas) Marty Matlock (University of Arkansas) Ryan Benefield (Arkansas Natural Resources Commission) Derek Smithee; Co-Chair (Oklahoma Water Resources Board) Shellie Chard (Oklahoma Dept. of Environmental Quality) Shanon Philips (Oklahoma Conservation Commission)

Page 2: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

2

Study Framework The Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus study was executed in accordance with the Second Statement of Joint Principles and Actions. The primary purpose of this study was (p.2, Mandatory Study Components): "to determine the total phosphorus threshold response level....at which any statistically significant shift occurs in

1. algal species composition or 2. algal biomass production

...resulting in undesirable 1. aesthetic or 2. water quality

...conditions in the Designated Scenic Rivers." Furthermore (p.3-4, Use of Study Findings and Results): “The States of Arkansas and Oklahoma, acting through their respective Parties, agree to be bound by the findings of the Joint Study. Oklahoma, through the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, agrees to promulgate any new Numeric Phosphorus Criterion, subject to applicable Oklahoma statutes, rules and regulations if significantly different than the current 0.037 mg/L standard. "Significantly different" means the new Numeric Phosphorus Criterion exceeds -.010 or +.010 than the current .037 criterion. If the new Numeric Phosphorus Criterion is at or between .027 and .047, then the State of Oklahoma is not required to promulgate the new criterion in its water quality standards. Arkansas agrees to be bound by and to fully comply with the Numeric Phosphorus Criterion at the Arkansas-Oklahoma State line, whether the existing 0.037 mg/L standard is confirmed or a new Numeric Phosphorus Criterion is promulgated. Parties for the States of Arkansas and Oklahoma shall forego any legal or administrative challenges to the Joint Study.” This report summarizes the work performed by Baylor University (the third party contractor) along with Joint Study Committee in the context of this study framework. The results presented herein are based on a field gradient “stressor-response” study designed to identify levels of total phosphorus that lead to the undesired outcomes described above. The study design, site selection, measurement endpoints, field methods, and statistical analyses were vetted and unanimously approved by the 6-member Joint Study Committee. Further, the results presented correspond to specifically requested analyses by members of the Joint Study Committee. This report does not include recommendations or conclusions regarding the numerical criterion, which are solely under the dominion of the committee. This report serves to guide the Joint Study Committee towards an informed, scientifically grounded recommendation for a numerical phosphorus criterion for the Oklahoma Scenic Rivers based on the results herein.

Page 3: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

3

Study Design Site selection Thirty-five stream reaches were selected for the study. These sites were located in watersheds of 5 of the 6 Oklahoma Designated Scenic Rivers (Illinois River, Flint Creek, Barren Fork Creek, Little Lee Creek, and Lee Creek; Table 1, Figure 1). Mountain Fork River was not included because it was not adjacent to any of the other rivers and deemed too dissimilar geologically to include in the stressor-response study. Candidate reaches were selected based on the following characteristics: (1) presence of riffle channel unit(s); (2) predominance of medium-to-large cobble substrate (10-20 cm); (3) mostly to fully open tree canopy (full sun), and (4) fast, turbulent flow, which is not always a characteristic of riffles in small streams but is in larger streams and rivers that were the primary focus of this study. The combination of these factors was deemed critical to ensure comparability between smaller streams and rivers in the study region and the Illinois River, the largest study stream that typically had habitat that fit all of these criteria. For example, had we sampled a subset of streams that had only gravel substrate in their riffles, the results would have been confounded by the fact that gravel is scoured much more easily than cobble because even the slightest changes in flow cause these substrates to roll downstream. Nuisance filamentous algae such as Cladophora are much more likely to be collected on larger, more stable substrates, and, when coupled with turbulent flow, are the typical locations where nuisance algal blooms are initiated in the large streams and rivers (Dodds and Gudder 1992). Full canopy was important because all of the Illinois River mainstem sites were open canopy and very low light conditions associated with dense tree canopy would have limited algal growth and confounded comparisons to open-canopy sites on the Illinois and other large streams in the study area. Reaches that met these criteria were prioritized for selection if they (1) had an existing USGS stream gage at or near the site, (2) had been or were being monitored for nutrients by Oklahoma or Arkansas. Additionally, the committee prioritized sites on the Illinois River because of its high levels of recreational use and socioeconomic importance to the region. Reaches were excluded if there was obvious gravel extraction activity, construction, or anything unusual at or near the site that could have affected the potential relationship between phosphorus and biological response variables. If all of these conditions were met, the final, most important criterion for site selection was that the sites spanned a gradient of total phosphorus (TP) representative of the full range of TP conditions in the Scenic Rivers, their tributaries, and adjacent watersheds. Existing TP data from intensively monitored locations by the University of Arkansas, Oklahoma Water Resources Board, and Oklahoma Conservation Commission guided the initial screening of sites for inclusion in the gradient study, along with an extensive sampling of 60 sites in April 2014 to identify additional locations not previously studied by these organizations. Based on these data, 35 stream reaches were chosen. Each site filled a gap in the continuum of total phosphorus concentrations from the lowest to the highest in the region such that the distribution of TP among sites was roughly log-linear.

Page 4: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

4

Table 1. Site codes, coordinates, and location description of the 35 stream reaches.

Name Latitude Longitude DescriptionBALL1 36.06137 -94.5732 Ballard @ E0660 RdBARR1 35.87954 -94.4822 Barren Fk @ SH45 Dutch MillsBARR2 35.91906 -94.6193 Barren Fk @ SH59 nr BaronBARR3 35.94727 -94.6935 Barren Fk @ N4670 Rd Christie BARR4 35.87013 -94.897 Barren Fk @ Welling BrBEAT1 36.35495 -94.7767 Beaty @ D0458 RdCANE1 35.78497 -94.8559 Caney @ Welling RoadCOVE1 35.68576 -94.3663 Cove @ Creek Fk RdEVAN1 35.87742 -94.5706 Evansville @ D0795 Rd.FLIN1 36.23973 -94.5007 Flint @ Dawn Hill East Rd nr. GentryFLIN2 36.21771 -94.6019 Flint @ D0553 nr West Siloam SpringsFLIN3 36.21454 -94.6655 Flint @ D4680 Rd Hazelnut HollowGOOS1 36.05603 -94.2912 Goose @ Little Elm Rd CR19ILLI1 35.95398 -94.2494 Illinois @ Orr RdILLI2 36.10135 -94.3441 Illinois @ SH16 nr SavoyILLI3 36.16864 -94.4355 Illinois @ Chambers Springs RdILLI4 36.1093 -94.5339 Illinois @ SH 59 AR CanoeingILLI5 36.14201 -94.6681 Illinois @ N4695 low water xing & River RdILLI6 36.17349 -94.7237 Illinois @ Flint CrILLI7 36.06755 -94.8823 Illinois @ Hanging Rock SH10ILLI8 35.91667 -94.928 Illinois @ SH62 TahlequahLEE1 35.68091 -94.3578 Lee @ Creek Fk RdLLEE1 35.57263 -94.5567 Little Lee @ SH101 NicutLSAL1 36.28455 -95.0887 Little Saline @ E506 RdMTFK1 35.68016 -94.4558 Mountain Fk @ SH59 pulloff S of DavidsonOSAG1 36.26593 -94.2378 Osage @ Healing Springs Rd CR264OSAG2 36.222 -94.2901 Osage @ Snavely RdSAGE1 36.198 -94.5829 Sager @ Beaver Springs Rd.SALI1 36.28154 -95.0932 Saline @ E6508 Rd USGS siteSPAR1 36.24367 -94.2393 Spring @ SH112 ARSPAV1 36.38485 -94.481 Spavinaw @ Limeklin Rd CR29SPAV2 36.32323 -94.6854 Spavinaw @ Colcord Kiethy RdSPRG1 36.1429 -94.9091 Spring @ Rocky Ford Rd & N556SPRG2 36.09092 -95.0147 Spring @ N485 Rd low water xingSPRG3 36.14833 -95.1548 Spring @ SH82

Page 5: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

5

Figure 1. Locations and site codes of the 35 sampling reaches (see Table 1).

Page 6: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

6

Catchment land cover/land use Land cover and land use in the catchments of the 35 sites varied primarily in the percentage cover of forest, pasture, or developed land (Figure 2, Table 2). Most sites, even those with relatively low levels of total phophorus, had at least 30% cover of pasture land. The exceptions were COVE1, LEE1, LLEE1, and MTFK1, catchments that skirted the edge of the Ozark Highlands and were primarily located in the adjacent Boston Mountains. These sites had steeper uplands that limited extensive ranching and development. However, pasture land in the these catchments was typically located near the stream, where, if a source of phosphorus, may have a greater effect on nutrients than if located farther away (e.g., King et al. 2005). Moreover, these sites had similar levels of total phosphorus as the sites with the lowest levels of pasture in the Ozark Highlands ecoregion (0.005-0.01 mg/L TP). Sites that had relatively high levels of impervious cover associated with urban development were on the low end of urban intensity indices when compared to major metropolitan areas around the world (e.g., Walsh et al. 2005). Only 4 sites exceeded 10% impervious cover, and each of these were included because they had wastewater effluent discharges from sewage treatment plants upstream of our sampling reaches. Although levels of impervious cover exceeding 10% are known to have negative effects on benthic macroinvertebrate diversity (e.g., King et al. 2011), this may be less true in large streams and wadeable rivers such as those in our study, where the effects of imperviousness on storm runoff and peak flows is diminished.

Figure 2. Land use and land cover patterns within the study area.

Page 7: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

7

Table 2. Catchment area and percentages of dominant land cover classes associated with each sampling location. Land cover data was extracted from the most recent version of the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD 2011).

Site ID Catchment area (km2) % Developed % Impervious cover % Forest % Grassland % Pasture % Row crop % WetlandBALL1 90.2 7.86 1.31 23.19 0.99 67.73 0.04 0.12BARR1 105.6 4.22 0.57 45.43 1.82 48.28 0.00 0.14BARR2 409.5 4.57 0.48 47.63 2.26 44.95 0.09 0.35BARR3 542.9 4.97 0.56 46.06 2.90 45.37 0.08 0.34BARR4 879.9 4.73 0.48 49.42 6.18 38.31 0.05 0.33BEAT1 152.6 5.02 0.70 29.76 2.14 61.72 1.22 0.06CANE1 232.9 5.93 0.98 43.54 3.37 46.71 0.10 0.09COVE1 135.3 2.24 0.14 84.33 2.16 11.18 0.00 0.04EVAN1 164.2 4.29 0.37 52.36 2.69 39.88 0.05 0.59FLIN1 64.9 9.27 1.83 25.60 2.79 61.50 0.00 0.35FLIN2 145.9 9.06 1.72 27.56 3.02 58.09 0.20 0.37FLIN3 245.2 13.18 3.59 27.94 3.62 53.43 0.24 0.36GOOS1 35.5 23.51 6.96 26.13 0.83 49.21 0.12 0.17ILLI1 68.9 4.52 0.44 55.61 2.70 36.85 0.06 0.25ILLI2 420.4 8.33 1.67 34.97 1.43 54.30 0.11 0.44ILLI3 1239.8 20.84 6.53 27.11 1.16 49.75 0.12 0.42ILLI4 1473.7 18.38 5.63 28.18 1.18 51.17 0.11 0.44ILLI5 1716.9 16.85 5.00 29.09 1.25 51.70 0.12 0.48ILLI6 2092.8 15.73 4.57 30.67 1.99 50.36 0.13 0.49ILLI7 2294.6 14.64 4.18 34.05 2.84 46.99 0.12 0.55ILLI8 2465.6 13.91 3.92 36.70 3.01 44.76 0.11 0.66LEE1 252.2 2.73 0.24 84.62 2.17 9.93 0.01 0.27LLEE1 264.1 2.79 0.16 77.98 8.53 9.22 0.00 0.19LSAL1 61.7 3.31 0.33 50.93 8.32 34.89 0.43 0.00MTFK1 67.1 2.45 0.10 84.70 4.94 7.02 0.00 0.03OSAG1 100.8 56.47 21.50 7.27 0.37 34.57 0.20 0.20OSAG2 337.4 36.94 13.02 11.29 0.36 50.38 0.16 0.15SAGE1 45.9 35.50 12.99 8.99 1.18 53.63 0.03 0.23SALI1 270.1 4.01 0.40 60.02 7.59 26.34 0.16 0.14SPAR1 91.7 44.02 16.31 11.69 0.24 42.69 0.01 0.10SPAV1 173.9 7.34 1.19 38.54 2.30 51.50 0.03 0.07SPAV2 421.6 6.41 1.09 38.10 2.04 52.91 0.28 0.09SPRG1 84.0 8.38 1.20 29.87 4.10 56.92 0.00 0.16SPRG2 194.8 5.79 0.71 39.09 4.01 50.36 0.00 0.25SPRG3 296.7 4.65 0.51 50.41 3.83 40.38 0.00 0.34

Page 8: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

8

Sampling frequency Sampling occurred on bimonthly schedule, subject to weather and stream flows. We chose to sample at this frequency for two years to increase the likelihood that we would detect nuisance algal blooms if they occurred (Biggs 2000). This sampling frequency resulted in 12 events (hereafter, Events 1-12), with 35 streams sampled per event, from June 2014 through April 2016 (Table 3), in addition to the total phosphorus (TP) data collected in April 2014 (hereafter, Event 0). Table 3. Schedule of sampling events. Comprehensive sampling occurred bimonthly starting in June 2014 through April 2016, whereas total phosphorus sampling began in April 2014.

Page 9: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

9

Field Methods Transect delineation Three transects were delineated to span a cross-section of each stream. Transects were delineated upon each site visit and did not necessarily correspond to previous transect locations because of different water levels or flood events that changed channel units between events. For large streams/rivers (e.g., middle and lower Illinois River, lower Barren Fork Creek, Lee Creek, and several others), we typically identified a single riffle channel unit. The channel unit often was a large riffle that extended to deeper water, whereby three transects began at the wetted margin of the stream out to the point in the stream deemed representative of riffle-glide habitat or before it was too deep or fast to safely sample. The longitudinal distribution of these transects were roughly equidistant from the upper to lower boundaries of the riffle, but were always placed to target medium-large cobble (10-20 cm) habitat. For streams with riffles that were wadeable from bank to bank and had a series of riffle-pool channel units within a relatively short length of longitudinal reach (<100 m), we selected 3 riffle channel units and placed one transect in each unit. Transects spanned the width of the optimal habitat, which typically was equal to the wetted width of the stream but occasionally was truncated by a pool, change in substrate, heavy shade, etc, along one margin of the stream. Here, transects extended from one bank out to the margin of the cross-section that had the appropriate depth, velocity, light, and substrate. Five sampling points were marked along each transect, roughly equidistant but allowing for some variability in location to ensure appropriate depth, velocity, light, and substrate. The first and last points were within 1-2 m from each end transects. Points 2, 3, and 4 were marked at 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 distances of transects. Points were marked on the stream bottom using flagging tape secured to a large, heavy washer. Surface water chemistry and phytoplankton collection Water and phytoplankton samples were collected above the upstream boundary of the reach after the upstream transect was marked. Triplicate TP samples were collected in new 50 mL centrifuge tubes and immediately preserved with sufficient volume of H2SO4 to achieve pH < 2. A single grab sample per site was collected for each of the following: TN (unfiltered, preserved with H2SO4), NH4-N, NO2+NO3-N, and PO4-P (field filtered, 0.45 µm, iced immediately, held at <4 C until frozen that evening.). Separate 1-L sestonic chlorophyll-a and total suspended solid samples were collected in dark bottles and placed on ice immediately. Sample collection followed the Baylor University Center for Reservoir and Aquatic Systems Research (CRASR) approved quality assurance/quality control protocols.

Page 10: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

10

Site characterization We measured the following physical and chemical variables to characterize the reach on every visit: wetted width (estimated when wading the full width of the stream was not possible), mean depth (m) and velocity (m/s) of riffle channel unit (corresponding to benthic algal sampling transects), canopy cover (0-100%), discharge (ft3/s, and several conventional water quality variables. Discharge was estimated using a Marsh-McBirney flowmeter following standard USGS protocols. Discharge generally was not measured at sites that were (a) gaged and had moderate to high flow at the time of sampling, and (b) too large or unsafe wade (mainstem Illinois River). Discharge at gaged sites was estimated during summer low-flow conditions if it can be accomplished safely. Temperature, specific conductivity, pH and optical dissolved oxygen were measured using YSI EXO1 multiprobes deployed for a minimum of 15 minutes during the site visit. Multiprobes were placed in flowing water above the reach. Readings were recorded manually after sensor readings stabilized. Multiprobes were calibrated prior to each event and post-calibration checked following each event. Periphyton collection Cobbles were collected at each of 15 points starting with the most downstream transect. The cobble nearest the transect marker that was 10-20 cm wide was selected regardless of the amount of algae on the top of the substrate, although oil shale fragments were excluded from sampling because they were rare. Rather, calcite or dolomite, the two dominant rock types in these streams, were selected. Cobbles were removed from the stream by carefully lifting the substrate slowly to the surface. Each substrate was carefully placed in a white sampling basin designated for that transect. This process was repeated until cobbles from each of the 5 points were collected, and repeated again for each of the 2 remaining transects. Each white basin was partially filled with stream water to keep the periphyton from desiccating and for enhancing the quality of photographs. Each white basin was photographed separately prior to removal of attached periphyton. A small white board with the date, site and transect ID, and event number marked using a dry erase marker was included in each photo to assist with cataloging of photos. Periphyton was removed from the 15 cobbles before leaving the site. Cobbles were scraped over a clean, deep-sided white pan using a stainless steel wire brush. All attached algae was removed from the upper surface of the cobble. Stream water was used to rinse residue from the cobble into the white pan. After all cobbles were scraped and rinsed, the contents were consolidated into one corner of the pan and poured into a 1 L dark bottle, which was immediately placed on ice to achieve a sample temperature of < 4 degrees C until processing later that day.

Page 11: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

11

Following the removal of periphyton from cobbles, the upper surface of each cobble was wrapped with aluminum foil for estimating the area (cm2) from which the periphyton was removed. Foil was carefully cut along the margins of the cobble corresponding to the perimeter of the area sampled, removed, and placed in a labeled bag. This process was repeated for all 15 cobbles prior to leaving the site. Foil was cleaned, dried and weighed using analytical balance. Total mass of foil per site was used to estimate area using a simple weight-to-area conversion factor. Hess (macroinvertebrate) sampling and transect marker characterization Macroinvertebrate sampling was done primarily to estimate the density and biomass of periphyton grazing taxa, particularly snails in the family Pleuroceridae. Grazing taxa can achieve high densities and exert strong top-down control on algal biomass, hence quantifying their abundance was considered an important ancillary measurement to help explain patterns of benthic algal biomass over time. Quantitative macroinvertebrate samples were collected using a Hess sampler approximately 0.5 m upstream of each of the 15 transect markers. The Hess sampler was placed upstream to avoid where the periphyton cobble was collected or where anyone had walked or otherwise disrupted the substrate. Once the Hess sampler was embedded into the substrate, water depth, dominant substrate (gravel or cobble), sedimentation index (qualitative, 1-20, similar to EPA RBP; Barbour et al. 1999), embeddeness of cobbles (0-100%), and stoneroller grazing scars (qualitative, 0-10) within the Hess sampler was recorded prior to disruption of the substrate in the sampler. Next, all gravel and cobble were thoroughly brushed to remove attached periphyton, organic matter, and aquatic macroinvertebrates. Brushing was done inside the sampler where material and organisms were flushed back into the trailing net. Once all surface rocks had been brushed and removed, the remaining substrate was vigorously agitated to a depth of 5 cm for at least 30 seconds to dislodge remaining organisms. Following this step, the Hess sampler was carefully but quickly lifted off of the bottom to help rinse material attached to the net into the dolphin bucket attached to the cod end of the net. Additional rinsing of material from the net into the dolphin bucket was done as necessary. Contents of the dolphin bucket were emptied into a heavy-duty plastic 4-L storage, which was eventually used to composite all 15 Hess samples from one site. Additional storage bags were used if necessary. Before leaving the site, the sample bag(s) was placed on ice for preservation using buffered formal at the temporary field lab later that same day. The final volume-to-volume concentration of formalin after being mixed with the sample material in the bag met or exceeded 5%. Diel dissolved oxygen and pH We deployed YSI EXO1 data sondes to measure optical dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH at 15-minute intervals for approximately 48 h at a minimum of 25 sites in summer 2014 and 2015.

Page 12: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

12

The purpose of measuring diel variability in these water quality variables was to determine whether TP was correlated with minimum dissolved oxygen and maximum pH. Both variables are mechanistically related to primary production in streams, but also are strongly influenced by differences in water turbulence (reaeration) among sites, groundwater discharge in the reach, and light conditions during deployment, all of which are very difficult to account for in the large streams and rivers sampled in this study. Sondes were deployed at a depth of approximately 0.5 m. Sondes were located in shallow glide-pool habitats above riffles in order to reduce the effect of reaeration on DO and pH. Sondes were calibrated immediately prior to deployment, and post-calibration checks were performed following deployment. Sondes that failed post-calibration were excluded from analysis, as were sondes that were affected by factors that biased the results, such as accumulation of drifting debris (which was noted upon retrieval) or an obvious groundwater input immediately adjacent to the deployment site (which was discovered upon reviewing the data).

Frequency and Duration of Stressor and Response Variables Two critical elements of developing a numerical criterion for total phosphorus for the Designated Scenic Rivers are sampling frequency (how often a TP sample is collected) and duration (over what period of time is the numerical criterion assessed, averaged, and evaluated for exceedance). A third element is frequency of excursion allowed during a defined assessment period to meet the criterion, but this beyond the scope of this report. Sampling frequency in our study was established during the study design phase prior to collection of any samples. Samples were collected bimonthly during base flow conditions only. The decision to sample during base flow conditions was based on several key factors: (1) it was impractical if not impossible under this budget to collect nearly continuous (daily to multiple times per day) samples to estimate phosphorus concentrations representative of all flow conditions from 35 locations over a 2 year period, (2) base flow conditions provide a more representative estimate of phosphorus availability to benthic algae because storm flows usually result in scouring of algae from rocks and very high turbidity which is not conducive for algal growth due to attenuation of light, (3) base flows occur >90% of the time, thus they are far and away the typical condition in streams, (4) US EPA (1998) recommends and many other states use base flow conditions to establish numerical criteria for streams and rivers, thus there is a precedent for using data collected only during base flow for estimating violations of a numerical criterion, and (5) base flow TP is typically strongly correlated to TP calculated across all flow conditions where such data are available (e.g., Figure ##) Duration was constrained by the length of the study (2 y) and was assessed by the comparing the strength of the relationships between mean TP calculated across different time intervals to biological response variables, particularly algal biomass. Mean TP (mg/L) was calculated at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 month intervals. A 2-month interval included TP samples from 2 events; for example, our first algal sampling event was June 2014, whereas our first phosphorus sampling event was April 2014 (Event 0). The mean of April and June 2014 TP was the value used when relating 2 month TP to benthic chlorophyll-a collected in June 2014 (see Data Analysis).

Page 13: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

13

Similarly, 4 month TP was calculated as the mean of the 2 previous events and the current event (e.g., Events 0, 1, and 2), and so forth. We used arithmetic mean because it was almost perfectly correlated to geometric mean (Figure ##) and is likely a better estimate of cumulative exposure. Response variables were analyzed as instantaneous measurements (e.g., 4 month mean TP vs. the observed level of benthic chlorophyll-a on a particular event that matched the 4 month TP window) and as mean responses that matched the TP duration (e.g., 4 month mean TP vs. the mean of benthic chlorophyll-a matching the same events used to calculate the 4 month TP; Figure ##). US EPA (2010) recommended calculating mean nutrient and response data if multiple collections were available from the same locations over time because it reduces variability, improves statistical models, and is consistent with the way numerical criteria are assessed (typically over a series of months or a year or more).

Page 14: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

14

Figure ##. Relationship between single grab samples collected by Baylor in April (upper panel) and June (lower panel) 2014 to mean TP over 1-2 years prior to the Baylor samples from intensive sites monitored by the Oklahoma Conservation Commission (OCC), Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB), and the University of Arkansas (UA).

Page 15: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

15

Figure ##. The relationship between geometric and arithmetic mean total phosphorus concentrations from the 35 study sites from April 2014 through April 2016 (n=13).

Page 16: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

16

Figure ##. Examples of the two different ways total phosphorus was related to biological response variables. This example is based on a 6 month mean TP. In the top row, each dot represents the “instantaneous” set of values of benthic chlorophyll-a measured on each of the events, and the red line represents the time interval (duration) over which TP was averaged prior to relating to these instantaneous measures of chlorophyll-a. In the bottom row, the blue bars represent the time interval used to calculate the “mean” set of response values of benthic chlorophyll-a, which matches the same set of data used to calculate the mean TP.

Page 17: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

17

Data Analysis The primary purpose of the Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study, as stated by the Second Statement of Joint Principals and Actions, page 2, was to identify “the total phosphorus threshold response level....at which any statistically significant shift occurs in algal species composition or algal biomass production...resulting in undesirable aesthetic or water quality...conditions in the Designated Scenic Rivers." A threshold level of TP, defined ecologically, is a where there is a disproportionately large change in an ecological response, such as algal biomass or species composition, with a relatively small incremental increase in concentration of TP (Groffman et al. 2003, Baker and King 2010). Statistically, a stressor-response threshold can be categorized into two broad, but complementary classes of methods. The first, a change point threshold approach, relates to finding value along a stressor gradient where the response variable, such as algal biomass, changes the most. Here, the goal is to estimate the level of the stressor (the x axis, or predictor variable) where the mean of a response variable increases or decreases disproportionately, such that by splitting the data into two groups defined as above and below that point, the means of those two groups would differ the most when compared to all other possible values of TP in the data set (Figure 3). The second approach involves identifying the value of the predictor where the mean (or median or other quantile) of the response (the fitted line of a regression, for example) intersects a critical reference value of the response, such as a minimum dissolved oxygen or nuisance levels of benthic chlorophyll-a (Figure 4). This reference value approach is ideal for a policy-based study where an a priori management target or standard has been previously established. The first approach is very useful when a management target is not defined or there is an additional goal of identifying where there is the largest change, regardless of a management target (e.g., “any statistically significant shift occurs….”, p2, Second Statement of Joint Principles and Actions). However, it should be made clear that the first approach based on splitting the data at the point of greatest change may not correspond to a reference value threshold for a particular endpoint. Here, we describe both approaches and how they were used to satisfy the primary purpose of the Second Statement of Joint Principles and Actions.

Page 18: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

18

Figure ##. Change point threshold approach based on splitting the data at a TP value that corresponds to the largest change in the response (in this case, biovolume of Cladophora, the primary nuisance species in the Designated Scenic Rivers). Here, the data are 2 month TP versus instantaneous Cladophora biovolume from June 2014.

Page 19: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

19

Figure ##. An illustration of the reference value approach. Here, the theoretical reference value is 30, which presumably represents a biological criterion beyond which conditions are considered unacceptable. The fitted line and confidence limits (dotted lines) are used to statistically estimate the level of the predictor (labeled “x12” in this example) that results in an intersection with the y-axis reference value. Here, the mean fitted response intersects the reference value at an x-axis value of approximately 17, whereas the lower and upper confidence limits intersect the reference value at 14 and 19, respectively. Thus, levels of the stressor (x12) that exceed 17, with uncertainty of 14-19, are likely to violate the biological response reference value (y12=30).

Page 20: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

20

Change-point threshold approaches Nonparametric change-point analysis There are several methods for estimating statistical change points, but many are not well suited for ecological data (see list of methods in Dodds et al. 2010). A nonparametric form (nCPA) of change point analysis that was employed by King and Richardson (2003) and is included as a recommended technique for deriving numeric nutrient criteria by US EPA (2010) is one of the few techniques that makes few implicit assumptions about the data, particularly ones almost always violated by comparable methods (e.g., piecewise linear regression), despite their widespread use (e.g., Toms and Lesperance 2003). Nonparametric change point analysis, or nCPA as implemented in King and Richardson (2003), is simply a restricted form of regression tree analysis (Death et al. 2002) that involves only one predictor and one “branch” in the tree. The branches are defined by the change point. However, there are a few important limitations of using a simple regression tree to identify change points. First, regression tree analysis identifies one value of the predictor (in this case, TP) that results in the greatest amount of variance explained (more technically, deviance), yet many other values of the predictor may explain very similar amounts of variance. In many stressor-response relationships, there is a zone of disproportionate change (see the gray area in Figure 3) where any one of several values in a relatively narrow range are nearly interchangeable in their ability to explain the variance in the response. To deal with this limitation, the change point approaches employed in this report use a bootstrapping algorithm to estimate quantile intervals (similar to confidence intervals) that provide estimates of uncertainty about where the true change point might be located, if there is one. This is very similar to the use of bootstrapping in Random Forest analysis, a related technique (Breiman 2001). Second, most simple regression tree analyses do not include an estimate of statistical significance, and those that do often assume a normal distribution, which is inappropriate. The nCPA method employed in this report uses a randomization test to estimate the probability that the variance explained by the model is not better than expected by chance. Change point analysis, has its own share of limitations, however. First, the analysis can yield biased change point estimates if the predictor data is strongly skewed (i.e., many high values and very few low, or vice-versa). However, this is a problem for all statistical methods and is a particular problem in observational stressor-response studies that are not carefully designed to sample a stressor gradient in a relatively uniform manner (King and Baker 2014). Second, the method will find a change point even if the response to the predictor is a linear relationship. However, the bootstrapping method largely alleviates this concern because the quantile intervals will span most of the range of x, indicating that the point of greatest change is highly uncertain and could be almost anywhere along the gradient. Thus, using the bootstrap results in conjunction with common sense (i.e., visualizing the data using scatterplots prior to conducting the analysis) allows for strong inferences to be made. In accordance with recommendations by the SRJSC, change-point analysis was used to estimate TP change-points for the following variables: algal biomass (benthic chlorophyll-a), Cladophora

Page 21: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

21

biovolume, and the proportion of nuisance algal taxa, the three primary variables of interest for assessing the relationship between TP and nuisance levels of algal biomass. Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis (TITAN) TITAN (Baker and King 2010) is an analytical approach for identifying and distinguishing threshold-type responses among many species simultaneously in response to a stressor gradient (e.g., algal species composition). King and Baker (2014) provide explicit detail on its use, misuse, and limitations for natural resource management. Briefly TITAN works by integrating a relatively simple and elegant measure of association in taxon abundance with a nonparametric technique for detecting change. Indicator species analysis (Dufrene and Legendre 1997) uses abundance-weighted occurrence frequency to describe association between a particular taxon and groups of samples defined by their order along an environmental gradient. To facilitate comparison across taxa, TITAN compares each taxon’s maximum IndVal score to those expected if the same sampled abundances were randomly distributed across the environmental gradient. A good indicator species is one that occurs frequently, so that changes in its abundance are easy to detect, but that is not the only kind of response worth noting. IndVal scores will always be small for rare, variable, or sensitive taxa, even though they can nonetheless represent important changes within a community. By comparison to the average IndVal scores derived by random permutation, TITAN standardizes measures of change for any given taxon to units of standard deviation (z scores; Baker and King 2010). Standardization emphasizes observed changes for each taxon relative to their own patterns of variability in abundance and occurrence. To better understand uncertainty surrounding the observed change points, TITAN employs a bootstrap resampling technique in the same way the previously described nCPA method does. Information provided by the bootstrap is critical for interpreting results in TITAN. In addition to estimation of change-point quantiles, TITAN evaluates consistency in the response direction as purity, and the frequency of a strong response magnitude as reliability (Baker and King 2010). Combined with a minimum occurrence frequency, these diagnostic indices are used as filters to help distinguish the signal produced by indicator taxa responses from stochastic noise along the gradient. This filtering is part of what distinguishes TITAN from many other multivariate techniques based on weighted averaging or dissimilarity. Once indicator taxa have been identified, TITAN provides information that can be used to identify a potential community-level threshold. A plot of filtered indicator taxa showing change-point quantiles from bootstrap replicates provides evidence regarding the existence of synchronous changes in the community structure (Figure 4, Texas stream example). Because the magnitude of all responses is standardized across taxa as z scores, their sum reflects the magnitude of community change at any point along the gradient. Distinct peaks in the sum(z) curve (maxima) plotted across the environmental gradient are another indication of coincident change in community structure. When bootstrap replicates used to compare the location of the sum(z) maxima across many sample replicates show a narrow band, this constitutes evidence for a threshold response (Baker and King 2010; King et al. 2011). TITAN was used to estimate taxa-specific change points and community-level thresholds in algal species abundance (biovolume/cm2) in response to TP.

Page 22: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

22

Figure 5. Example of output from Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis (TITAN). In this example from a study conducted in wadeable streams in central Texas (Taylor et al. 2014), species with negative responses to total phosphorus are shown as filled symbols, whereas species that increased in response to TP are shown as open circles (upper panel). The location of the symbols corresponds to the level of TP resulting the greatest change in the frequency and abundance of each taxon (the change point) and the horizontal lines span the lower to upper quantile intervals (uncertainty). The lower panel illustrates the sum of the responses of the pure and reliable threshold indicator taxa. Sumz- (negative responding taxa) sharply peaks at 0.021 mg/L TP with lower and upper quantile limits of 0.016-0.052 mg/L. Sumz+ (positive responding taxa) sharply peaked at 0.028 (0.018-0.048) mg/L TP. Both results are indicative of a significant shift in species composition between ~0.02-0.05 mg/L TP.

Page 23: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

23

Reference value threshold approach Neither Oklahoma nor Arkansas has numerical standards for benthic algal biomass or species composition. Scientific literature and a few states (e.g., Montana, Suplee et al. 2007) have either recommended or adopted ~150-200 mg/m2 benthic chlorophyll-a as a management threshold, such that levels above this value represent nuisance levels of algal biomass. Thus, values of benthic chlorophyll-a at or above 150-200 mg/m2 could be used as a reference values in this study for use in analyses that are set up to ask “at what level of TP does benthic chlorophyll-a exceed x mg/m2?”. However, differences between large streams and rivers in this study and those from typically much smaller streams in other regions of the world where these numbers have been adopted must be considered prior to using these reference values. Further, differences in taxonomic structure of periphyton in pristine streams of this region relative to other regions where those numbers have been adopted could result in lower or higher natural levels of benthic chlorophyll-a. For these reasons, we examined values of benthic chlorophyll-a at sites at the low end of the TP gradient to assess the natural range of conditions that might be expected at reference sites in the Ozark Highlands and Boston Mountains ecoregions. Second, we fit an empirical relationships between benthic chlorophyll-a and biovolume of the dominant nuisance algal species in these streams, Cladophora glomerata, to refine estimates of nuisance levels of benthic algal biomass that were calibrated to these waterbodies (see Results for greater details). Based on these assessments, we identified 150, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m2 benthic chlorophyll-a as reference values representing potential nuisance levels of algae for the Designated Scenic Rivers. We assessed these reference levels using two methods. First, we related mean benthic chlorophyll-a to year 1, year 2, and years 1 and 2 combined mean TP using a generalized additive modeling approach (GAM; Zuur 2009). A GAM model was the most appropriate for these response data because of nonlinearity that did not match a functional relationship (e.g., power, log, exponential). We used a Gamma probability distribution with an identity link function because the variance in the response was highly correlated to the predictor. Further, we weighted each mean by the inverse of its standard deviation (1/sd) so that points with higher variance associated with their means (more uncertainty) received less weight in the model, and vice versa. Second, we analyzed the frequency of exceedance of each of those values as response variables to year 1, year 2, and years 1 and 2 combined mean TP using generalized linear models (GLM; Zuur 2009). We calculated the number of times each site exceeded 150, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m2 benthic chlorophyll-a and fit a model based on a binomial (logistic) probability distribution to the data. The proportion of the total number of events per site in which benthic chlorophyll-a exceeded each of these values (4 separate response variables) was used as a response to mean TP. The total number of events, which was 12 for all but 3 sites that were either not flowing (ILLI1 and EVAN1, October 2014) or flooded (CANE1, June and December 2015) during our sampling event, was used as the weight for the binomial model (Zuur et al. 2009). The resulting models generated fitted responses of the proportion of times in which

Page 24: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

24

benthic chlorophyll-a exceeded each of those 4 critical values for all levels of mean TP in the study.

Results Temporal patterns in stream discharge, nutrients, and algal biomass Sampling was successfully completed every two months during baseflow conditions at all of the 35 sites over the 2 year study, with the exception of two sites in October 2014 (ILLI1, EVAN1; streams were not flowing) and another site during June 2015 and December 2015 (CANE1; site was flooded by backwater from Lake Tenkiller). Hydrographs (Figure ##) illustrate that 2014 through early 2015 was largely devoid of major storm flows associated with large precipitation events. This was not a particularly dry period, either, as precipitation was normal and baseflows remained near the historical median for gaged sites. By April 2015, a much wetter weather pattern associated with El Niño conditions developed for the rest of the year, resulting in frequent storm flow conditions and culminating in an historic flood in late December 2015. The period following the historic flood was relatively dry and allowed the streams to return to high baseflow conditions by early February and relatively normal stream levels through March and April 2016. Total phosphorus concentrations were relatively consistent within each stream over time with the exception of SAGE1, which was wastewater effluent dominated, and several other sites during periods of high primary production associated with blooms of Cladophora glomerata. In the latter instances, uptake by benthic algae reduced TP to levels 0.01-0.04 mg/L below the median TP value at these sites over the 2-y study (Figure ##). The patterns of benthic chlorophyll-a in this figure (symbols sized in proportion to chlorophyll-a values) also corroborate a very consistent pattern of sharp declines in TP with high levels of benthic chlorophyll-a. Although not necessarily a focus of this study, it is important to acknowledge that nitrogen is also critical to primary production in streams, and has been suggested as possibly a stronger correlate of benthic chlorophyll-a in Ozark Highland streams in Arkansas. Because sources of phosphorus are almost always sources of nitrogen, too (e.g., wastewater discharges), it is logical that nitrogen should correlate well with benthic chlorophyll if phosphorus is also a good correlate. The problem with using simple correlations to ascribe causation is demonstrated, in part, in Figure ## because it shows that during periods of high primary production, phosphorus is rapidly removed from the water column such that the relationship between TP and benthic chlorophyll-a at the particular point in time is likely to be weak, and probably weaker than the relationship to total nitrogen if nitrogen isn’t removed at the same rate as phosphorus, and particularly if it isn’t reduced at all relative to typical concentrations at that site. To illustrate this point further, we plotted TP as the difference (deviation) from the median value measured at each site during the 2 year study (Figure ##). Large, negative deviations were almost always associated with disproportionately high levels of benthic chlorophyll and increasingly high N:P ratios, typically > 100 (Figure ##). Thus, it was the antecedent TP conditions that led to blooms, and when blooms were present, TP was being taken up more

Page 25: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

25

rapidly than it was desorbing from sediment or being supplied by wastewater (Figuere ##). Conversely, TN showed no temporal pattern that related to benthic chlorophyll-a. Thus, this study’s focus on P as the primary driver of potential nuisance conditions of algal biomass appears well supported.

Page 26: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

26

Figure ##. Daily mean discharge at USGS gage 07196500, Illinois River at Tahlequah, from April 2014-2016. Location of the stars indicates the approximate timing of sampling. Discharge is log-scaled in the upper panel, whereas an untransformed scale is used in the lower panel. The huge peak in the lower panel corresponds to the historic flood event in late December 2015.

Page 27: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

27

Figure ##. Temporal patterns of total phosphorus among the 35 study sites. Symbols are sized in relative proportion to benthic chlorophyll-a measured at the time of sampling. Note that, with the exception of SAGE1, which was effluent dominated, and to some degree, SPAR1 (also with a large proportion of base flow as wastewater effluent), most of the variability in TP over time within a site was related to whether there were high levels of benthic chlorophyll on the stream bottom at the time of sampling. In these cases, TP values declined sharply, very likely due to biological uptake. Sites with relatively low levels of TP and benthic chlorophyll-a throughout the study tended to have relatively consistent TP concentrations.

Page 28: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

28

Figure ##. Dot plot of total phosphorus by sites (n=12 events), expressed as the deviation from the median 2-year concentration in mg/L. The 35 study sites are listed in rank order of their median 2-y TP concentrations. Each TP value is sized by the deviation from the site median for benthic chlorophyll-a; large values represent large, positive deviations from the typical level of chlorophyll at that site over the 2-year study. The colors represent the total nitrogen to total phosphorus ratio (N:P ratio) based on the measured TN and TP on that sampling event. N:P ratios <20 can be associated with N limiting conditions, whereas values above 20 increasingly demonstrate P limitation, or, at least, that there was a surplus of nitrogen relative to phosphorus. Note that in almost every case where benthic chlorophyll-a was much higher than the median (large dots), the total phosphorus value was lower, sometimes much lower, than the median. Further, under these conditions, the N:P ratio was >20 (green) and typically >100 (blue), but never <20 (orange). This implies that phosphorus, not nitrogen, was the driver of primary production among the study streams, although the high concentrations of nitrogen in these systems ensured that blooms were not restricted by N.

Page 29: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

29

Figure ##. Plots of benthic chlorophyll-a in response to TN (upper) and TP (lower) deviations from site medians. The upper panel shows that the largest chlorophyll-a values were associated with mostly normal TN concentrations, with no relationship to benthic chlorophyll-a. The lower panel shows that almost all of the high chlorophyll-a levels corresponded to sharp reductions in TP. The fitted relationship shows that as TP levels were increasingly reduced, chlorophyll was at its highest. TP levels that are far above the median appear to be related to below normal levels of benthic chlorophyll-a.

Page 30: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

30

Relationships between total phosphorus and algal biomass Benthic chlorophyll-a varied markedly over time among the study sites (Figure ##). Levels of chlorophyll increased only slightly between June and October 2014, but increased dramatically during the months of December 2014 and February 2015 when a bloom of Cladophora glomerata was ongoing.

Figure ##. Relationship between benthic chlorophyll-a and 6-month mean TP across each event. Event 1 (June 2014) and 2 (August 2014) are based on 2 and 4 month mean TP values, respectively, because 6 month data was not available.

Page 31: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

31

Benthic chlorophyll-a was reduced markedly by April 2015 following moderate storm flows that scoured much of the Cladophora off the stream bottom (Figure ##). Reduction in benthic algal biomass continued through the summer and fall of 2015 (events 7-10). During this period, many large precipitation events resulted in very high stream flows and heavy scouring of algae, but often disproportionately among sites. Between event 10 (early December 2015) and 11 (early February 2016), the historic flood occurred that resulted in a complete scouring of substrate to the extent that channel morphology at most sites did not resemble previous conditions. Despite the complete scouring following the historic flood, algal biomass recovered very quickly in by early February 2016, with some sites supporting levels up to 500 mg/m2. However, filamentous green algae was not abundant during this event, and it appeared to be mostly dominated by diatoms and cyanobacteria. Further, due to a complete elimination of grazing macroinvertebrates, particularly pleurocerid snails, and the dormancy of the dominant vertebrate grazers (stonerollers, Campostoma anomalum and Campostoma oligolepsis), the relationship between 6-month TP and algal biomass very closely resembled a theoretical growth-response curve, with a steep increase at low levels of TP and a gradual reduction in the slope (Figure ##, panel 11). By April 2016, Cladophora glomerata had become well established and contributed to even higher levels of algal biomass, with one site exceeding 1000 mg/m2 (Figures ## and ##, panel 12)

Figure ##. Relationship between benthic chlorophyll-a and 6-month mean TP across each event. This figure is identical to figure ## except that the y-axis was truncated at 1000 mg/m2 so that the relationship between TP and benthic chlorophyll-a during periods outside the massive Cladophora blooms could be better visualized.

Page 32: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

32

Change point analysis: TP vs. benthic chlorophyll-a The series of plots in the section Temporal patterns in stream discharge, nutrients, and algal biomass revealed the problem of relating nutrients to primary production or algal biomass. Despite the overall consistent levels of TP within a site over time, periods of high primary production can deplete TP and potentially cause the relationship between instantaneous measures of TP and algal biomass to break down. Thus, TP change points were estimated using means calculated at durations of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months. TP at these different durations were related to both instantaneous and mean chlorophyll-a (Figure ##, Tables ## and ##).

Figure ##. Two-year mean TP (April 2014-2016) vs. 2 year mean benthic chlorophyll-a. The dashed red line corresponds to 0.037 mg/L TP, whereas the dotted lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L TP, respectively.

Page 33: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

33

Figure ##. Total phosphorus change points in relation to benthic chlorophyll a. The columns represent 6, 8, 10, and 12 month TP durations, whereas the rows separate instantaneous and mean chlorophyll-a. Points correspond to the observed change point, gray bars span the 25-75%

bootstrap quantiles, and black bars span the 5-95% bootstrap quantiles. The dashed red line is 0.037 mg/L TP, whereas the upper and lower dotted lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L. Results for 2 and 4 month TP are not shown, but are included in tables ## and ##.

Page 34: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

34

Table ##. Change points for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 month mean total phosphorus in relation to instantaneous benthic chlorophyll-a.

Event Date TP Duration Chl-a Duration Observed (Median (boot) p-value Mean (low) Mean (high) 5% (boot) 25% (boot) 75% (boot) 95% (boot)1 14-Jun 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.016 0.016 0.001 81.9 200.8 0.010 0.013 0.016 0.0292 14-Aug 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.017 0.017 0.002 89.4 210.7 0.011 0.012 0.051 0.0613 14-Oct 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.022 0.022 0.001 97.1 260.7 0.016 0.017 0.027 0.0554 14-Dec 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.038 0.038 0.027 186.3 634.7 0.024 0.035 0.041 0.0435 15-Feb 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.0716 15-Apr 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.029 0.029 0.023 194.4 383.9 0.017 0.028 0.029 0.0447 15-Jun 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.037 0.037 0.005 49.3 192.2 0.031 0.037 0.048 0.0488 15-Aug 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.061 0.055 0.031 87.7 143.0 0.019 0.031 0.061 0.0699 15-Oct 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.040 0.039 0.010 131.3 229.2 0.012 0.037 0.040 0.047

10 15-Dec 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.27511 16-Feb 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.031 0.031 0.001 111.7 318.8 0.018 0.027 0.042 0.04412 16-Apr 2 mo. Instantaneous 0.017 0.017 0.006 66.2 461.9 0.012 0.014 0.017 0.031

2 14-Aug 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.016 0.016 0.001 89.4 210.7 0.010 0.011 0.043 0.0513 14-Oct 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.020 0.020 0.001 97.1 260.7 0.015 0.020 0.027 0.0544 14-Dec 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.037 0.037 0.020 213.1 659.4 0.022 0.037 0.038 0.0495 15-Feb 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.027 0.034 0.034 240.7 1105.2 0.025 0.027 0.035 0.0656 15-Apr 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.030 0.030 0.017 194.4 383.9 0.012 0.028 0.035 0.0477 15-Jun 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.030 0.033 0.008 49.3 192.2 0.028 0.030 0.041 0.0538 15-Aug 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.059 0.048 0.017 89.8 149.5 0.020 0.038 0.059 0.0619 15-Oct 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.037 0.037 0.019 128.7 221.6 0.012 0.029 0.040 0.046

10 15-Dec 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.12911 16-Feb 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.034 0.034 0.001 124.8 329.7 0.023 0.031 0.048 0.05812 16-Apr 4 mo. Instantaneous 0.021 0.021 0.008 66.2 464.7 0.013 0.016 0.038 0.042

3 14-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.019 0.019 0.001 97.1 260.7 0.013 0.019 0.034 0.0464 14-Dec 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.037 0.037 0.010 213.1 659.4 0.021 0.037 0.050 0.0535 15-Feb 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.035 0.035 0.003 326.4 1319.5 0.033 0.033 0.035 0.0566 15-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.034 0.034 0.022 185.5 371.7 0.015 0.032 0.038 0.0587 15-Jun 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.037 0.034 0.010 74.1 208.4 0.016 0.028 0.041 0.0518 15-Aug 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.056 0.043 0.011 89.9 157.7 0.018 0.033 0.056 0.0579 15-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.038 0.038 0.025 130.3 220.5 0.011 0.020 0.042 0.046

10 15-Dec 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.12411 16-Feb 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.036 0.036 0.001 124.8 329.7 0.024 0.034 0.052 0.06012 16-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.021 0.021 0.003 66.2 461.9 0.013 0.021 0.043 0.043

4 14-Dec 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.035 0.035 0.005 213.1 659.4 0.020 0.034 0.036 0.0495 15-Feb 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.035 0.035 0.007 297.1 1292.0 0.033 0.035 0.037 0.0586 15-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.014 0.036 0.055 142.7 336.1 0.010 0.014 0.048 0.0597 15-Jun 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.033 0.038 0.005 49.3 192.2 0.029 0.033 0.052 0.0588 15-Aug 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.056 0.055 0.012 89.9 157.7 0.017 0.030 0.056 0.0569 15-Oct 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.034 0.034 0.029 130.3 220.5 0.010 0.018 0.038 0.040

10 15-Dec 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.10611 16-Feb 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.029 0.043 0.001 93.1 310.1 0.024 0.029 0.051 0.05812 16-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.022 0.022 0.002 66.2 461.9 0.014 0.022 0.046 0.047

5 15-Feb 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.033 0.033 0.004 297.1 1292.0 0.032 0.032 0.035 0.0486 15-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.049 0.041 0.025 229.9 410.6 0.010 0.034 0.049 0.0617 15-Jun 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.034 0.044 0.009 49.3 192.2 0.030 0.034 0.053 0.0588 15-Aug 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.060 0.045 0.011 89.9 157.7 0.018 0.035 0.060 0.0609 15-Oct 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.033 0.033 0.027 130.3 220.5 0.011 0.017 0.039 0.039

10 15-Dec 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.11611 16-Feb 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.036 0.040 0.001 120.5 322.8 0.025 0.032 0.049 0.05812 16-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.048 0.047 0.003 200.9 570.6 0.015 0.022 0.048 0.049

6 15-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.055 0.035 0.042 245.9 447.2 0.010 0.031 0.054 0.0557 15-Jun 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.050 0.050 0.003 78.5 233.9 0.034 0.036 0.050 0.0578 15-Aug 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.060 0.048 0.014 89.9 157.7 0.017 0.035 0.060 0.0609 15-Oct 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.035 0.035 0.025 130.3 220.5 0.011 0.018 0.039 0.040

10 15-Dec 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.21511 16-Feb 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.043 0.041 0.001 150.7 350.1 0.018 0.030 0.043 0.05612 16-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.046 0.045 0.001 200.9 570.6 0.018 0.024 0.046 0.046

Bootstrap quantiles (mg/L)Chlorophyll-a (mg/m2)TP change points (mg/L)

Page 35: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

35

Table ##. Change points for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 month mean total phosphorus in relation to mean benthic chlorophyll-a.

Event Date TP Duration Chl-a Duration Observed (mg/L) Median (boot) p-value Mean (low) Mean (high) 5% (boot) 25% (boot) 75% (boot) 95% (boot)2 14-Aug 2 mo. Mean 0.017 0.017 0.001 85.7 209.5 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.0573 14-Oct 2 mo. Mean 0.022 0.022 0.001 91.0 235.7 0.017 0.017 0.022 0.0554 14-Dec 2 mo. Mean 0.038 0.038 0.012 164.9 451.9 0.019 0.035 0.041 0.0435 15-Feb 2 mo. Mean 0.016 0.016 0.047 182.5 811.9 0.010 0.016 0.021 0.0326 15-Apr 2 mo. Mean 0.026 0.026 0.017 235.8 736.2 0.022 0.024 0.027 0.0277 15-Jun 2 mo. Mean 0.037 0.037 0.017 121.9 278.8 0.015 0.035 0.040 0.0488 15-Aug 2 mo. Mean 0.053 0.053 0.017 76.6 165.2 0.025 0.036 0.061 0.0619 15-Oct 2 mo. Mean 0.040 0.040 0.004 101.2 180.0 0.019 0.039 0.040 0.047

10 15-Dec 2 mo. Mean 0.019 0.019 0.009 76.1 150.1 0.007 0.015 0.033 0.04211 16-Feb 2 mo. Mean 0.023 0.023 0.001 65.1 199.2 0.011 0.018 0.023 0.03112 16-Apr 2 mo. Mean 0.017 0.017 0.001 77.4 382.5 0.012 0.017 0.019 0.031

2 14-Aug 4 mo. Mean 0.016 0.016 0.001 85.7 209.5 0.010 0.012 0.016 0.0513 14-Oct 4 mo. Mean 0.020 0.020 0.001 87.3 226.1 0.015 0.016 0.020 0.0384 14-Dec 4 mo. Mean 0.037 0.037 0.004 152.9 379.5 0.016 0.022 0.038 0.0495 15-Feb 4 mo. Mean 0.029 0.034 0.017 203.0 667.5 0.020 0.027 0.035 0.0356 15-Apr 4 mo. Mean 0.027 0.027 0.010 218.3 696.2 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.0287 15-Jun 4 mo. Mean 0.030 0.030 0.006 173.7 574.8 0.027 0.029 0.030 0.0378 15-Aug 4 mo. Mean 0.038 0.038 0.011 105.7 224.5 0.015 0.035 0.045 0.0599 15-Oct 4 mo. Mean 0.037 0.037 0.003 82.7 177.9 0.019 0.037 0.046 0.060

10 15-Dec 4 mo. Mean 0.019 0.019 0.003 72.1 138.7 0.011 0.019 0.042 0.04811 16-Feb 4 mo. Mean 0.023 0.023 0.001 84.2 202.0 0.011 0.018 0.031 0.03912 16-Apr 4 mo. Mean 0.021 0.021 0.001 65.4 288.1 0.013 0.016 0.021 0.038

3 14-Oct 6 mo. Mean 0.019 0.019 0.001 87.3 226.1 0.013 0.015 0.019 0.0344 14-Dec 6 mo. Mean 0.037 0.037 0.001 160.4 385.1 0.016 0.021 0.050 0.0535 15-Feb 6 mo. Mean 0.035 0.035 0.003 245.4 759.2 0.033 0.033 0.035 0.0356 15-Apr 6 mo. Mean 0.032 0.032 0.006 219.4 718.2 0.027 0.029 0.032 0.0407 15-Jun 6 mo. Mean 0.028 0.031 0.004 157.2 548.5 0.026 0.028 0.034 0.0378 15-Aug 6 mo. Mean 0.033 0.037 0.008 105.7 224.5 0.018 0.033 0.055 0.0569 15-Oct 6 mo. Mean 0.038 0.038 0.002 84.3 176.9 0.020 0.038 0.046 0.058

10 15-Dec 6 mo. Mean 0.019 0.030 0.004 72.1 138.7 0.012 0.019 0.039 0.04711 16-Feb 6 mo. Mean 0.024 0.024 0.001 84.2 202.0 0.011 0.018 0.036 0.04212 16-Apr 6 mo. Mean 0.021 0.021 0.001 65.4 288.2 0.013 0.016 0.021 0.043

4 14-Dec 8 mo. Mean 0.020 0.020 0.001 101.7 315.4 0.013 0.020 0.035 0.0495 15-Feb 8 mo. Mean 0.035 0.035 0.002 201.5 615.8 0.033 0.034 0.037 0.0486 15-Apr 8 mo. Mean 0.037 0.036 0.002 243.6 657.2 0.029 0.033 0.037 0.0467 15-Jun 8 mo. Mean 0.033 0.033 0.002 176.8 589.6 0.028 0.033 0.038 0.0398 15-Aug 8 mo. Mean 0.037 0.037 0.002 172.0 473.4 0.028 0.030 0.040 0.0409 15-Oct 8 mo. Mean 0.034 0.034 0.010 111.8 223.1 0.014 0.030 0.045 0.056

10 15-Dec 8 mo. Mean 0.020 0.033 0.003 62.1 145.5 0.012 0.020 0.040 0.04711 16-Feb 8 mo. Mean 0.029 0.029 0.001 82.3 183.8 0.015 0.029 0.034 0.04312 16-Apr 8 mo. Mean 0.022 0.022 0.001 79.7 267.8 0.014 0.022 0.026 0.046

5 15-Feb 10 mo. Mean 0.033 0.033 0.001 185.1 537.6 0.032 0.032 0.033 0.0356 15-Apr 10 mo. Mean 0.037 0.037 0.001 203.0 567.2 0.032 0.036 0.037 0.0377 15-Jun 10 mo. Mean 0.038 0.037 0.001 211.7 564.9 0.030 0.034 0.038 0.0478 15-Aug 10 mo. Mean 0.040 0.039 0.003 194.7 534.5 0.031 0.035 0.040 0.0489 15-Oct 10 mo. Mean 0.039 0.038 0.001 173.8 444.1 0.029 0.033 0.039 0.039

10 15-Dec 10 mo. Mean 0.018 0.030 0.005 80.7 185.8 0.011 0.018 0.043 0.05611 16-Feb 10 mo. Mean 0.025 0.032 0.001 72.0 178.5 0.014 0.025 0.038 0.04412 16-Apr 10 mo. Mean 0.027 0.027 0.001 84.5 240.8 0.015 0.022 0.027 0.048

6 15-Apr 12 mo. Mean 0.035 0.035 0.001 189.1 510.7 0.031 0.035 0.035 0.0357 15-Jun 12 mo. Mean 0.036 0.036 0.001 170.9 497.6 0.034 0.036 0.036 0.0498 15-Aug 12 mo. Mean 0.040 0.040 0.003 188.8 492.0 0.031 0.035 0.040 0.0489 15-Oct 12 mo. Mean 0.040 0.039 0.002 185.9 483.2 0.030 0.035 0.040 0.048

10 15-Dec 12 mo. Mean 0.041 0.038 0.002 158.9 383.4 0.028 0.035 0.041 0.04111 16-Feb 12 mo. Mean 0.018 0.030 0.001 81.3 204.3 0.014 0.018 0.041 0.04312 16-Apr 12 mo. Mean 0.024 0.024 0.001 71.0 226.7 0.014 0.024 0.034 0.046

TP change points (mg/L) Chlorophyll-a (mg/m2) Bootstrap quantiles (mg/L)

Page 36: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

36

Change point analysis: TP vs. Cladophora glomerata biovolume Cladophora glomerata was the dominant filamentous green alga identified in the study. Cladophora is widely known as a nuisance species that proliferates with nutrient overenrichment (Dodds and Gudder 1992). Benthic algal biomass values that exceeded 200-300 mg/m2 were typically associated with high levels of Cladophora biovolume. Cladophora biovolume was very low to completely absent at relatively low levels of TP, but a clear, nonlinear change in its frequency and abundance occurred at moderate to high levels of TP (Figure ##, Table ##).

Figure ##. Two-year mean TP (April 2014-2016) vs. mean Cladophora glomerata biovolume from events 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 12. The dashed red line corresponds to 0.037 mg/L TP, whereas the dotted lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L TP, respectively.

Page 37: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

37

Table ##. Table ##. Change points for 6, 8, 10, and 12 month mean total phosphorus in relation to instantaneous and mean Cladophora glomerata biovolume. Cladophora biovolume was measured only on events 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 12.

Figure ##. Photograph of Cladophora glomerata covering the stream bottom of the Illinois River at Tahlequah (ILLI8), February 2015.

Event Date TP Duration Cladophora Duration Observed Median (boot) p-value Mean (low) Mean (high) 5% (boot) 25% (boot) 75% (boot) 95% (boot)3 14-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.048 0.048 0.001 406 9028 0.033 0.033 0.035 0.0375 15-Feb 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.037 0.035 0.004 3277 109728 0.033 0.034 0.037 0.0416 15-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.0659 15-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.038 0.039 0.048 47 1031 0.035 0.037 0.052 0.066

12 16-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.025 0.025 0.005 0 22428 0.018 0.024 0.042 0.0435 15-Feb 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.035 0.033 0.003 3277 109728 0.032 0.033 0.035 0.0396 15-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.0589 15-Oct 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.034 0.034 0.035 47 1031 0.031 0.033 0.042 0.094

12 16-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.026 0.026 0.032 0 22428 0.019 0.026 0.046 0.0485 15-Feb 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.035 0.035 0.007 3277 109728 0.033 0.033 0.035 0.0486 15-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous9 15-Oct 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.033 0.033 0.033 47 1031 0.030 0.033 0.039 0.085

12 16-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.027 0.027 0.014 0 22428 0.019 0.026 0.048 0.0496 15-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.0749 15-Oct 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.035 0.035 0.029 47 1031 0.032 0.034 0.047 0.083

12 16-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.024 0.024 0.033 0 22428 0.015 0.021 0.046 0.0483 14-Oct 6 mo. Mean 0.048 0.036 0.007 1515 6848 0.016 0.033 0.050 0.0555 15-Feb 6 mo. Mean 0.035 0.034 0.002 1771 58932 0.033 0.034 0.035 0.0406 15-Apr 6 mo. Mean 0.032 0.031 0.014 1235 49174 0.027 0.031 0.032 0.0389 15-Oct 6 mo. Mean 0.051 0.051 0.017 492 6327 0.049 0.050 0.052 0.058

12 16-Apr 6 mo. Mean 0.043 0.039 0.042 2229 15714 0.018 0.024 0.043 0.0465 15-Oct 8 mo. Mean 0.040 0.039 0.004 1334 40199 0.035 0.039 0.040 0.0426 16-Apr 8 mo. Mean 0.046 0.046 0.033 2229 15714 0.019 0.026 0.046 0.0499 15-Feb 8 mo. Mean 0.037 0.035 0.003 1980 40855 0.033 0.034 0.037 0.041

12 15-Apr 8 mo. Mean 0.037 0.037 0.001 1343 42562 0.036 0.037 0.037 0.0395 15-Feb 10 mo. Mean 0.035 0.033 0.001 1980 40855 0.032 0.033 0.035 0.0396 15-Apr 10 mo. Mean 0.038 0.037 0.001 1605 33097 0.036 0.036 0.038 0.0489 15-Oct 10 mo. Mean 0.039 0.038 0.001 1334 40199 0.036 0.038 0.039 0.041

12 16-Apr 10 mo. Mean 0.048 0.047 0.015 2248 16650 0.019 0.027 0.048 0.0496 15-Apr 12 mo. Mean 0.037 0.035 0.001 1605 33097 0.034 0.035 0.036 0.0379 15-Oct 12 mo. Mean 0.039 0.038 0.001 1069 32183 0.036 0.038 0.039 0.041

12 16-Apr 12 mo. Mean 0.046 0.046 0.025 1907 14665 0.021 0.040 0.046 0.04912 16-Apr 24 mo. Mean 0.039 0.039 0.002 1832 26752 0.035 0.035 0.039 0.047

Biovolume (mm3/m2) Bootstrap quantiles (mg/L)Change points (mg/L)

Page 38: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

38

Change point analysis: TP vs. nuisance taxa proportion of total biovolume Five genera of filamentous green algae that occurred in our data set were classified as nuisance taxa: Cladophora, Oedogonium, Rhizoclonium, Spirogyra, and Hydrodictyon. Although Cladophora represented most of the biovolume of the total nuisance biovolume (>95%), there were a few sites that had blooms of other taxa during the 2 year study. The committee recommended that the analysis be conducted on the proportion of the total biovolume as nuisance taxa as a complementary but different way of examining the data. Because diatoms were identified on only 4 events compared to 6 events for soft algae, proportions were calculated based on the total soft-algae biovolume. A binomial form of change point analysis was used for these data, which is appropriate for proportion data (Zuur et al. 2009).

Figure ##. Two-year mean TP (April 2014-2016) vs. mean nuisance taxa proportion from events 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 12. The dashed red line corresponds to 0.037 mg/L TP, whereas the dotted lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L TP, respectively.

Page 39: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

39

Table ##. Change points for 6, 8, 10, and 12 month mean total phosphorus in relation to instantaneous and mean nuisance taxa proportion of total biovolume. Soft algal species composition was measured only on events 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 12.

Event Date TP Duration Nuisance Duration Observed Median (boot) p-value Mean (low) Mean (high) 5% (boot) 25% (boot) 75% (boot) 95% (boot)14-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.074 0.073 0.001 0.238 0.781 0.047 0.052 0.077 0.08515-Feb 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.035 0.035 0.005 0.153 0.856 0.033 0.034 0.052 0.05615-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous ns15-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.051 0.051 0.036 0.112 0.330 0.045 0.051 0.052 0.09716-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous 0.043 0.042 0.002 0.148 0.878 0.035 0.038 0.043 0.05815-Feb 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.035 0.036 0.002 0.106 0.861 0.033 0.034 0.056 0.05815-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous ns15-Oct 8 mo. Instantaneous ns16-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous 0.046 0.046 0.005 0.148 0.878 0.038 0.042 0.047 0.06015-Feb 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.033 0.033 0.004 0.106 0.861 0.032 0.033 0.048 0.05815-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous ns15-Oct 10 mo. Instantaneous ns16-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous 0.047 0.047 0.004 0.148 0.878 0.036 0.043 0.048 0.06015-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous ns15-Oct 12 mo. Instantaneous ns16-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous 0.046 0.046 0.003 0.148 0.878 0.037 0.043 0.046 0.05814-Oct 6 mo. Mean 0.052 0.057 0.049 0.116 0.464 0.036 0.051 0.074 0.11315-Feb 6 mo. Mean 0.035 0.035 0.004 0.154 0.840 0.033 0.034 0.048 0.05615-Apr 6 mo. Mean 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.273 0.800 0.028 0.037 0.055 0.06415-Oct 6 mo. Mean 0.058 0.057 0.096 0.263 0.579 0.036 0.050 0.059 0.10216-Apr 6 mo. Mean 0.043 0.042 0.015 0.223 0.777 0.031 0.038 0.044 0.05815-Feb 8 mo. Mean 0.035 0.049 0.011 0.102 0.701 0.033 0.035 0.056 0.10515-Apr 8 mo. Mean 0.037 0.037 0.003 0.160 0.820 0.036 0.037 0.048 0.05915-Oct 8 mo. Mean ns16-Apr 8 mo. Mean 0.046 0.046 0.010 0.223 0.777 0.037 0.040 0.047 0.06115-Feb 10 mo. Mean 0.033 0.035 0.009 0.102 0.701 0.032 0.033 0.054 0.10015-Apr 10 mo. Mean 0.037 0.038 0.002 0.120 0.821 0.036 0.036 0.048 0.05515-Oct 10 mo. Mean ns16-Apr 10 mo. Mean 0.048 0.048 0.005 0.238 0.794 0.036 0.046 0.048 0.06015-Apr 12 mo. Mean 0.035 0.036 0.009 0.107 0.703 0.035 0.035 0.055 0.09515-Oct 12 mo. Mean 0.039 0.039 0.003 0.170 0.803 0.036 0.038 0.040 0.05616-Apr 12 mo. Mean 0.046 0.046 0.020 0.274 0.754 0.037 0.042 0.047 0.05916-Apr 24 mo. Mean 0.039 0.039 0.005 0.179 0.734 0.035 0.036 0.040 0.061

TP change points (mg/L) Nuisance proportion Bootstrap quantiles (mg/L)

Page 40: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

40

TITAN: TP vs. algal community composition

Figure ##. Results of TITAN using two-year mean TP (April 2014-2016) as the predictor vs. mean biovolume of all taxa that occurred at least 3 times from events 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 12. Shown are pure and reliable threshold indicator taxa. Negative responding taxa are listed on the left y-axis and marked by dark blue points, whereas positive responding taxa are on the right y-axis and marked by red points. Points are located at change point. Error bars represent the 5-95% bootstrap quantile intervals. The community-level threshold for negative-responding taxa (sumz-) was 0.021 (0.010-0.025) mg/L, whereas the positive-responding community threshold was also 0.021 mg/L, but had higher bootstrap quantile intervals (0.016-0.033). The vertical, red dashed line corresponds to 0.037 mg/L TP, whereas the vertical dotted lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L TP, respectively.

Page 41: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

41

Table ##. TITAN community-level negative (declining taxa only) change points for 6, 8, 10, and 12 month mean total phosphorus in relation to instantaneous and mean taxa biovolumes.

Event Date TP Duration Taxa Duration Response direction Observed Median(boot) 5% (boot) 10% (boot) 90% (boot) 95% (boot)1 14-Jun 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.019 0.019 0.016 0.017 0.025 0.0253 14-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.013 0.013 0.010 0.011 0.035 0.0375 15-Feb 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.025 0.025 0.013 0.013 0.029 0.0336 15-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.017 0.016 0.012 0.012 0.021 0.0229 15-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.026 0.026 0.016 0.021 0.029 0.030

12 16-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.010 0.013 0.010 0.010 0.023 0.0275 15-Feb 8 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.033 0.033 0.013 0.013 0.035 0.0376 15-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.012 0.014 0.011 0.011 0.020 0.0219 15-Oct 8 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.024 0.024 0.014 0.015 0.027 0.029

12 16-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.011 0.013 0.011 0.011 0.029 0.0375 15-Feb 10 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.024 0.024 0.012 0.012 0.032 0.0336 15-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.012 0.013 0.010 0.011 0.020 0.0219 16-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.023 0.023 0.014 0.015 0.027 0.029

12 15-Oct 10 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.011 0.012 0.009 0.010 0.033 0.0346 15-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.011 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.020 0.0219 15-Oct 12 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.023 0.023 0.015 0.017 0.028 0.030

12 16-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous sumz- (negative) 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.010 0.030 0.0353 14-Oct 6 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.019 0.019 0.010 0.011 0.025 0.0255 15-Feb 6 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.025 0.028 0.013 0.021 0.037 0.0376 15-Apr 6 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.013 0.024 0.0259 15-Oct 6 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.020 0.020 0.014 0.016 0.027 0.029

12 16-Apr 6 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.021 0.021 0.010 0.011 0.024 0.0275 15-Feb 8 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.025 0.028 0.013 0.021 0.037 0.0396 15-Apr 8 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.016 0.016 0.011 0.012 0.021 0.0239 15-Oct 8 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.024 0.021 0.012 0.013 0.024 0.027

12 16-Apr 8 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.022 0.022 0.011 0.013 0.029 0.0295 15-Feb 10 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.019 0.019 0.011 0.016 0.024 0.0256 15-Apr 10 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.014 0.015 0.010 0.012 0.026 0.0349 15-Oct 10 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.023 0.021 0.010 0.011 0.023 0.026

12 16-Apr 10 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.011 0.022 0.011 0.011 0.025 0.0276 15-Apr 12 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.020 0.019 0.012 0.012 0.021 0.0239 15-Oct 12 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.023 0.018 0.013 0.013 0.023 0.025

12 16-Apr 12 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.018 0.018 0.011 0.012 0.024 0.02412 16-Apr 24 mo. Mean sumz- (negative) 0.021 0.021 0.010 0.011 0.024 0.025

TP change points (mg/L) Bootstrap quantiles (mg/L)

Page 42: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

42

Table ##. TITAN community-level positive (increasing taxa only) change points for 6, 8, 10, and 12 month mean total phosphorus in relation to instantaneous and mean taxa biovolumes.

Event Date TP Duration Taxa Duration Response direction Observed Median(boot) 5% (boot) 10% (boot) 90% (boot) 95% (boot)1 14-Jun 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.035 0.034 0.018 0.019 0.056 0.0563 14-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.056 0.056 0.042 0.051 0.064 0.0705 15-Feb 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.020 0.025 0.019 0.020 0.035 0.0376 15-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.038 0.034 0.022 0.027 0.042 0.0429 15-Oct 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.050 0.038 0.020 0.021 0.050 0.050

12 16-Apr 6 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.020 0.043 0.0435 15-Feb 8 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.025 0.025 0.019 0.019 0.037 0.0396 15-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.039 0.038 0.027 0.029 0.043 0.0489 15-Oct 8 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.034 0.034 0.016 0.018 0.043 0.044

12 16-Apr 8 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.022 0.026 0.019 0.021 0.046 0.0475 15-Feb 10 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.024 0.024 0.019 0.019 0.035 0.0366 15-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.037 0.037 0.031 0.032 0.049 0.0499 16-Apr 10 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.039 0.038 0.017 0.021 0.042 0.042

12 15-Oct 10 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.022 0.027 0.019 0.021 0.047 0.0486 15-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.035 0.035 0.029 0.031 0.041 0.0439 15-Oct 12 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.040 0.035 0.015 0.018 0.048 0.048

12 16-Apr 12 mo. Instantaneous sumz+ (positive) 0.024 0.024 0.020 0.021 0.046 0.0463 14-Oct 6 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.019 0.021 0.017 0.018 0.035 0.0405 15-Feb 6 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.037 0.037 0.023 0.025 0.049 0.0516 15-Apr 6 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.029 0.035 0.023 0.025 0.043 0.0489 15-Oct 6 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.049 0.047 0.032 0.033 0.050 0.050

12 16-Apr 6 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.016 0.021 0.014 0.016 0.031 0.0355 15-Feb 8 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.033 0.035 0.021 0.024 0.049 0.0516 15-Apr 8 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.039 0.037 0.020 0.026 0.043 0.0469 15-Oct 8 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.030 0.030 0.021 0.024 0.042 0.043

12 16-Apr 8 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.022 0.024 0.015 0.017 0.035 0.0415 15-Feb 10 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.019 0.021 0.016 0.017 0.032 0.0336 15-Apr 10 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.037 0.037 0.024 0.026 0.041 0.0499 15-Oct 10 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.029 0.029 0.022 0.023 0.040 0.041

12 16-Apr 10 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.027 0.023 0.016 0.017 0.036 0.0416 15-Apr 12 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.025 0.025 0.019 0.020 0.035 0.0359 15-Oct 12 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.028 0.028 0.018 0.018 0.040 0.042

12 16-Apr 12 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.024 0.024 0.016 0.018 0.042 0.04212 16-Apr 24 mo. Mean sumz+ (positive) 0.021 0.024 0.016 0.019 0.029 0.033

TP change points (mg/L) Bootstrap quantiles (mg/L)

Page 43: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

43

Reference value approach: exceedance frequencies of levels of algal biomass We related biovolume of Cladophora glomerata, which was measured during events 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 12, to benthic chlorophyll-a, which was measured during all 12 events, to evaluate whether there was a level of benthic chlorophyll that corresponded to a nonlinear increase in Cladophora. The rationale was that (1) we did not have biovolume of Cladophora for all events, because this requires manual microscopic estimation by an expert taxonomist, a tedious and expensive process beyond the budget of this study, (2) “nuisance” levels defined by the literature are subjective, and (3) some of our sites with low phosphorus consistently yielded benthic chlorophyll-a levels that approached or exceeded literature values for “nuisance” conditions (>150-200 mg/m2), yet virtually none of this algal biomass was Cladophora or other nuisance species of filamentous green algae. Graphical visualization of the relationship between mean Cladophora biovolume and benthic chlorophyll-a suggested that segmented regression would be the most appropriate method for estimating the level of algal biomass that corresponded to a shift to the dominant nuisance species in the Designated Scenic Rivers. This particular method is generally not appropriate for most types of ecological data because it requires that the relationship between two variables can be represented by two or more linear segments that conform to parametric assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity. However, in this instance, these two variables were dependent on each other and exhibited a relationship that was ideal for segmented regression. Lack of independence was not an issue here because we were not testing a hypothesis that required this assumption. Results of these analyses (Figure ##) indicated that 290 and 183 mg/m2 benthic chlorophyll-a were levels corresponding to a shift from essentially no Cladophora to a linear increase in Cladophora biovolume during years 1 and 2, respectively. Year 1 was not dry, but lacked significant scouring events, particularly during fall 2014 when the Cladophora bloom began to take hold. Year 2 was wet and had many significant scouring events including the historic flood in December 2015. Based on these results, after rounding up/down to account for statistical uncertainty (see confidence limits, Figure ##), we agreed that 150-200 mg/m2 likely represented the lower end of potential nuisance levels of algal biomass in the Designated Scenic Rivers, whereas levels above 300 mg/m2 should be considered nuisance levels under most conditions, acknowledging that a few sites with the lowest levels of TP in the region achieved benthic chlorophyll-a >300 mg/m2 in February 2015, an event marking the end of several months of relatively stable flow.

Page 44: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

44

Figure ##. Results of segmented regression relating mean Cladophora glomerata biovolume to mean benthic chlorophyll-a during year 1 (upper panel) and year 2 (lower panel). Year 1 data represents a year with very stable flows overall, whereas year 2 represents a wet year with many scouring flows, including an historic flood.

Page 45: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

45

Figure ##. Mean benthic chlorophyll-a in year 1 (dry year, upper panel) and year 2 (wet year, lower panel) to annual mean total phosphorus. The fitted solid blue line is the result of a generalized additive model (GAM, deviance explained=88.5% and 89%, years 1 and 2 respectively) with 95% confidence limits shown as fine dotted lines around the fitted line. The mean chlorophyll-a values were weighted by inverse of the standard deviation to account for uncertainty. The red vertical dashed line corresponds to 0.037, whereas the dotted red vertical lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L, respectively.

Page 46: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

46

Figure ##. Mean benthic chlorophyll-a in response to mean 2-year total phosphorus. The fitted solid blue line is the result of a generalized additive model (GAM; deviance explained=90%, p<0.00001) with 95% confidence limits shown as fine dotted lines around the fitted line. The mean chlorophyll-a values were weighted by inverse of the standard deviation to account for uncertainty. The red vertical dashed line corresponds to 0.037, whereas the dotted red vertical lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L, respectively.

Page 47: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

47

Table ##. Predicted mean benthic chlorophyll-a in response year 1, year 2, and years 1 and 2-year mean total phosphorus at concentrations spanning 0.01 to 0.1 mg/L. The predictions are based on GAM models for each of the 3 data sets, with years 1 and 2 illustrated in the previous figure.

TP (mg/L) Mean 5% CI 95% CI Mean 5% CI 95% CI Mean 5% CI 95% CI0.010 93 80 107 73 67 79 92 83 1020.020 209 173 244 131 118 145 182 161 2030.027 255 211 298 157 140 174 218 194 2420.030 270 224 317 166 148 184 230 205 2560.037 300 247 354 183 163 204 254 225 2830.040 311 255 368 190 168 212 263 232 2930.047 333 269 397 204 180 227 280 246 3140.050 342 275 409 209 184 233 287 251 3230.060 366 289 444 224 197 251 307 265 3480.075 396 304 488 243 213 273 331 281 3810.100 435 319 550 267 234 301 362 298 427

Year 1 (Dry, stable flows) Year 2 (Wet, many storm flows) Years 1 and 2, combinedPredicted benthic chlorophyll-a, mg/m2

Page 48: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

48

Figure ##. Exceedance frequencies of 150 (purple), 200 (blue), 250 (green), and 300 (dark red) mg/m2 benthic chlorophyll-a in response to 2 year mean total phosphorus. GLM models for each response variable were fit using a binomial probability distribution and a logit link function. TP was a highly significant predictor in all 4 models (p<0.00001).

Page 49: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

49

Table ##. Predicted exceedance frequencies of 150, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m2 benthic chlorophyll-a for year 1 (dry year), year 2 (wet year), and years 1 and 2 combined in response to mean total phosphorus.

Year 1 TP (mg/L) Mean 2.5% 97.% Mean 2.5% 97.5% Mean 2.5% 97.5% Mean 2.5% 97.5%0.010 0.29 0.17 0.41 0.25 0.14 0.35 0.10 0.04 0.17 0.12 0.05 0.190.020 0.68 0.59 0.77 0.47 0.38 0.56 0.21 0.14 0.29 0.22 0.15 0.300.027 0.81 0.74 0.88 0.58 0.50 0.65 0.28 0.21 0.35 0.29 0.22 0.360.030 0.84 0.78 0.91 0.61 0.54 0.69 0.30 0.23 0.37 0.31 0.24 0.380.037 0.90 0.84 0.95 0.68 0.61 0.75 0.36 0.29 0.43 0.36 0.29 0.44

0.040 0.91 0.86 0.96 0.71 0.63 0.78 0.38 0.31 0.45 0.39 0.31 0.460.047 0.94 0.90 0.98 0.75 0.68 0.82 0.43 0.35 0.51 0.43 0.35 0.510.050 0.95 0.91 0.98 0.77 0.70 0.84 0.45 0.37 0.53 0.45 0.37 0.530.060 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.81 0.74 0.88 0.50 0.41 0.59 0.50 0.41 0.590.075 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.86 0.79 0.92 0.57 0.46 0.67 0.56 0.45 0.660.100 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.90 0.84 0.96 0.65 0.53 0.77 0.64 0.51 0.76

Year 2

0.010 0.14 0.06 0.22 0.06 0.01 0.11 0.09 0.03 0.16 0.03 0.00 0.060.020 0.29 0.20 0.37 0.16 0.09 0.24 0.20 0.12 0.28 0.08 0.03 0.130.027 0.37 0.29 0.45 0.24 0.16 0.31 0.27 0.20 0.34 0.12 0.06 0.180.030 0.40 0.33 0.48 0.27 0.19 0.34 0.30 0.22 0.37 0.14 0.08 0.200.037 0.47 0.40 0.55 0.33 0.26 0.41 0.36 0.29 0.43 0.18 0.12 0.240.040 0.50 0.42 0.57 0.36 0.29 0.44 0.38 0.31 0.45 0.20 0.14 0.260.047 0.55 0.47 0.63 0.42 0.34 0.50 0.43 0.35 0.51 0.24 0.18 0.310.050 0.57 0.49 0.65 0.45 0.36 0.53 0.45 0.37 0.53 0.26 0.19 0.330.060 0.62 0.54 0.71 0.52 0.42 0.61 0.51 0.42 0.60 0.32 0.23 0.400.075 0.69 0.59 0.78 0.60 0.49 0.71 0.58 0.48 0.69 0.40 0.28 0.510.100 0.89 0.80 0.97 0.87 0.77 0.98 0.83 0.72 0.95 0.75 0.55 0.95

Years 1 and 20.010 0.23 0.09 0.37 0.15 0.04 0.27 0.10 0.00 0.20 0.07 0.00 0.150.020 0.45 0.33 0.57 0.31 0.20 0.43 0.21 0.11 0.30 0.15 0.07 0.230.027 0.56 0.44 0.68 0.40 0.31 0.50 0.27 0.18 0.37 0.21 0.13 0.280.030 0.60 0.50 0.70 0.44 0.34 0.54 0.30 0.20 0.40 0.23 0.13 0.330.037 0.67 0.57 0.77 0.51 0.41 0.61 0.36 0.26 0.46 0.28 0.18 0.370.040 0.69 0.60 0.79 0.54 0.44 0.63 0.38 0.28 0.48 0.29 0.20 0.390.047 0.74 0.64 0.84 0.59 0.49 0.69 0.43 0.31 0.55 0.34 0.24 0.430.050 0.76 0.68 0.84 0.61 0.51 0.71 0.45 0.33 0.57 0.35 0.26 0.450.060 0.80 0.72 0.88 0.66 0.55 0.78 0.51 0.39 0.62 0.41 0.29 0.520.075 0.85 0.77 0.93 0.73 0.61 0.84 0.57 0.44 0.71 0.47 0.34 0.610.100 0.90 0.82 0.97 0.80 0.68 0.91 0.66 0.50 0.82 0.56 0.38 0.74

Predicted exceedance frequencies of benthic chlorophyll-a vs. TP150 mg/m2 200 mg/m2 250 mg/m2 300 mg/m2

Page 50: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

50

Diel dissolved oxygen and pH Multiprobe data sondes were deployed for 48-h at a minimum of 25 sites during August 2014 (near median baseflow conditions, late summer) and September 2015 (high baseflow conditions). The following figures illustrate the relationship between 6 month mean TP and minimum dissolved oxygen and maximum pH recorded during each 48-h deployment.

Figure ##. Minimum 48-h dissolved oxygen in August 2014 in response to mean 6-month total phosphorus. The red vertical dashed line corresponds to 0.037, whereas the dotted red vertical lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L, respectively.

Page 51: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

51

Figure ##. Maximum 48-h pH in August 2014 in response to mean 6-month total phosphorus. The red vertical dashed line corresponds to 0.037, whereas the dotted red vertical lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L, respectively.

Page 52: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

52

Figure ##. Minimum 48-h dissolved oxygen in September 2015 in response to mean 6-month total phosphorus. The red vertical dashed line corresponds to 0.037, whereas the dotted red vertical lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L, respectively.

Page 53: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

53

Figure ##. Maximum 48-h pH in September 2015 in response to mean 6-month total phosphorus. The red vertical dashed line corresponds to 0.037, whereas the dotted red vertical lines correspond to 0.027 and 0.047 mg/L, respectively.

Page 54: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

54

Macroinvertebrates The dominant grazing macroinvertebrate taxon in the study streams were snails in the family Pleuroceridae (Figure ##). Seasonally, pleurocerid densities varied considerably. Particular sites would have relatively few during one event but, by the next event, had exploded to levels such as those shown in the photograph. Pleurocerids achieved densities up to 2000 individuals/m2 based on estimates from Hess samples (Figure ##). The highest densities were observed in streams near the upper end of the phosphorus gradient, such as Spring Creek (AR; SPAR1), Osage Creek (OSAG1, OSAG2), Sager Creek (SAGE1), and Flint Creek (FLIN1, 2, and 3).

Figure ##. Photo of the stream bottom at Flint Creek (FLIN3) in late summer 2014, illustrating high densities of pleurocerid snails, the dominant algal grazing macroinvertebrate in the study streams.

Page 55: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

55

Snails were abundant in at least a few streams during every event, regardless of season. Densities were likely underestimated during event 1 (June 2014) because snails would fall to the bottom of the stream bed when cobble and gravel were agitated to dislodge macroinvertebrates into the Hess sampler. Methods were adjusted during the following events such that rocks within the sampler were carefully lifted off the bottom and brushed directly into the net bag on the Hess sampler. The only seasonal pattern evident was the nearly complete elimination of snails in events 11 and 12, which followed the historic flood of December 2015. This partially explains the very rapid growth of algae following the flood, as there was little to no grazing pressure by snails. Moreover, stonerollers (Campostoma spp.) were not actively grazing during the winter and early spring, thus February and April 2016 represented a nearly unrestricted growth response to nutrients.

Figure ##. Densities of pleurocerid snails versus 6 month mean TP across the 2-year study period. Numbers in the upper panels are event numbers (1-12).

Page 56: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

56

Responses of other macroinvertebrates varied but generally showed increases in density with increasing levels of TP. The following figure illustrates the mean response of each of the functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrates to TP over the 2-year study period.

Figure ##. Mean responses of macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups to total phosphorus over the 2-year study period. FC=filtering collectors; GC=gathering collectors; SC=scrapers/grazers of algae, excluding pleurocerid snails; PR=predators; SH=shredders; Pleuro=pleurocerid snails.

Page 57: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

57

Summary

The following histogram synthesizes the change points estimated by change point analysis and TITAN on all of the focal biological response variables analyzed using those techniques: benthic chlorophyll-a, Cladophora biovolume, nuisance taxa proportion, and community-level thresholds for negative and positive responding taxa (TITAN). Because analyses were conducted on several different TP durations, the 6 month duration was chosen for this summary because it was very similar to longer durations and was a stronger predictor than shorter durations in most cases.

Figure ##. Histogram illustrating the distribution of total phosphorus change points across several response variables over the 2-year study period. Shown are change points associated with 6-month mean TP and instantaneous and mean responses that correspond to the TP data. The dashed red vertical line corresponds to 0.037, whereas the dotted vertical lines are 0.027 and 0.47, respectively.

Page 58: Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint … 2016.11.8 Draft Final...1 . Oklahoma-Arkansas Scenic Rivers Joint Phosphorus Study . Draft Final Report . 17 November 2016 . Principal Investigator:

58

Literature Cited Baker, M. E. and R. S. King. 2010. A new method for detecting and interpreting biodiversity and ecological community thresholds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1:25-37, Baker, M.E., and R. S. King. 2013. Of TITAN and straw men: an appeal for greater understanding of community data. Freshwater Science 32:489-506 Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., & Stribling, J. B. (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers. USEPA, Washington. Biggs, B. J., & Kilroy, C. (2000). Stream periphyton monitoring manual. NIWA. Biggs, B. J. (2000). Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 19(1), 17-31. Dodds, W.K. and Gudder, D.A., 1992. The ecology of Cladophora. Journal of Phycology, 28(4), pp.415-427. King, R. S. and M. E. Baker. 2010. Considerations for analyzing ecological community thresholds in response to anthropogenic environmental gradients. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29:998-1008 King R.S. & Richardson C.J. (2003) Integrating bioassessment and ecological risk assessment: An approach to developing numerical water-quality criteria. Environmental Management, 31, 795-809. Stevenson, R. J., B. J. Bennett, D. N. Jordan, and Ron D. French. 2012. Phosphorus regulates stream injury by filamentous green algae, DO, and pH with thresholds in responses. Hydrobiologia (2012) 695:25–42 Taylor, J. M., J. A. Back, and R. S. King. 2012. Grazing minnows increase benthic autotrophy and enhance the response of periphyton elemental composition to experimental phosphorus additions. Freshwater Science 31:451-462. Taylor, J. M., R.S. King, A. Pease, and K.O. Winemiller. 2014. Nonlinear response in stream ecosystem structure to low level phosphorus enrichment. Freshwater Biology 59:969-984. USEPA. 2010. Using Stressor-response Relationships to Derive Numeric Nutrient Criteria. Zuur, A. F. (2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer.