1
Olik k i Si Si l Olikt k P i t Sit Si A l Oliktok Point Site Science: Aerosols Oliktok Point Site Science: Aerosols Oliktok Point Site Science: Aerosols Oliktok Point Site Science: Aerosols (1) (2) Oliktok Point Site Science: Aerosols (1) (2) (1) (2) 12 12 2 12 12 J i C 12 Gij d B 12 Alli MC ik 2 M tth Sh 12 M tth N 12 Jessie Creamean 1,2 Gijs de Boer 1,2 Allison McComiskey 2 Matthew Shupe 1,2 Matthew Norgren 1,2 Jessie Creamean , Gijs de Boer , Allison McComiskey , Matthew Shupe , Matthew Norgren Jessie Creamean , Gijs de Boer , Allison McComiskey , Matthew Shupe , Matthew Norgren Introduction Climatology of Surface Aerosol Properties Introduction Climatology of Surface Aerosol Properties Introduction Climatology of Surface Aerosol Properties Evaluating Arctic aerosol properties has implications for cloud formation resulting in impacts on cloud Extension of previous work by Quinn et al (2002; 2009) using entire record of aerosol chemical physical and optical properties Evaluating Arctic aerosol properties has implications for cloud formation, resulting in impacts on cloud Extension of previous work by Quinn et al. (2002; 2009) using entire record of aerosol chemical, physical, and optical properties. lif i ii i d di i f i (Q i l 2008 MF h l 2011) lifetime precipitation processes and radiative forcing (Quinn et al 2008; McFarquhar et al 2011) Th fi bl h th it thl i ti d l ti hi bt ll l t tB lifetime, precipitation processes, and radiative forcing (Quinn et al., 2008; McFarquhar et al. 2011) The figure below shows the inter-monthly variations and relationships between all aerosol measurements at Barrow The figure below shows the inter monthly variations and relationships between all aerosol measurements at Barrow. Further many remaining uncertainties exist regarding modeled and observed Arctic aerosol proper Further, many remaining uncertainties exist regarding modeled and observed Arctic aerosol proper- Further, many remaining uncertainties exist regarding modeled and observed Arctic aerosol proper ties thus a better understanding of aerosol properties and sources in the Arctic is needed ties, thus, a better understanding of aerosol properties and sources in the Arctic is needed. H t h i li tl f l h i l h i l d ti l ti Here, we present a comprehensive climatology of aerosol physical, chemical, and optical properties Here, we present a comprehensive climatology of aerosol physical, chemical, and optical properties along the North Slope of Alaska at the joint NOAA and DOE ARM Barrow facility We also investigate along the North Slope of Alaska at the joint NOAA and DOE ARM Barrow facility. We also investigate th t ti l f lt (i i ld t) t i fl l di f ti i i it d the potential for aerosol type (i e mineral dust) to influence cloud ice formation using in situ and re- the potential for aerosol type (i.e., mineral dust) to influence cloud ice formation using in situ and re mote sensing measurements (DeMott et al 2003) mote sensing measurements (DeMott et al., 2003). mote sensing measurements (DeMott et al., 2003). A l Ob ti tB Aerosol Observations at Barrow Aerosol Observations at Barrow Aerosol Observations at Barrow A l b ti tB t db kt 1976 S T bl 1f th lt li t f l Aerosol observations at Barrow extend back to 1976. See Table 1 for the complete list of aerosol Aerosol observations at Barrow extend back to 1976. See Table 1 for the complete list of aerosol measurements and where data were accessed measurements and where data were accessed. Instrument/ Size cut Measurement Instrument/ λ(nm) Size cut Agency Data source Years available 1 Measurement Method λ (nm) (µm) Agency Data source Years available Method (µm) Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer 2007 2009 2012 Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (S S) N/A 1 TROPOS GMD 2007 2009, 2012 (SMPS) N/A 1 TROPOS GMD pres. Particle number concentrations (SMPS) pres. Particle number concentrations (CN) GMD GMD 1976 (CN) Condensation particle Counter GMD GMD 1976 pres. Condensation particle Counter N/A 10 GMD GMD 1976 pres. (CPC) N/A 10 ARM (AOS) ARM 1998 pres (CPC) ARM (AOS) ARM 1998 pres. 2007 2009 2012 Particle size distributions SMPS N/A 1 TROPOS GMD 2007 2009, 2012 Particle size distributions SMPS N/A 1 TROPOS GMD pres pres. 1 2006 pres 470 1 GMD 2006 pres. 470 GMD 10 2006 p es 10 2006 pres. GMD 1997 pres. 1 GMD 1997 pres. P ti l S t Ab ti Ph 550/ 1 ARM 1998 pres Absorption coefficient (σ ) Particle Soot Absorption Pho- GMD 550/ ARM 1998 pres. Absorption coefficient (σ a ) tometer (PSAP) GMD 528 GMD 1988 pres tometer (PSAP) 528 10 GMD 1988 pres. 10 ARM 1998 ARM 1998 pres. ARM 1998 pres. 1 2006 pres 660 1 GMD 2006 pres. 660 GMD 10 2006 pres E l i h I fA h i D Cl dI 10 2006 pres. Evaluating the Impact of Atmospheric Dust on Cloud Ice GMD 1997 Evaluating the Impact of Atmospheric Dust on Cloud Ice 1 GMD 1997 pres. Evaluating the Impact of Atmospheric Dust on Cloud Ice 1 1 ARM 1998 pres Here we combine information from NOAA filter samples with ARM remote sensors and 450 ARM 1998 pres. Here we combine information from NOAA filter samples with ARM remote sensors and 450 GMD 1976 pres Here we combine information from NOAA filter samples with ARM remote sensors and 10 GMD 1976 pres. NWS and ARM radiosondes to evaluate whether there is a noticeable increase in in-cloud 10 ARM 1998 NWS and ARM radiosondes to evaluate whether there is a noticeable increase in in-cloud ARM 1998 pres. ice amo nt fo time pe iods ith d st loading D st loading is based on the mass concen ice amount for time periods with dust loading. Dust loading is based on the mass concen- GMD 1997 pres. ice amount for time periods with dust loading. Dust loading is based on the mass concen 1 GMD 1997 pres. tration of non sea salt magnesium and non sea salt calcium Cloud top ice super satura 1 ARM 1998 pres tration of non-sea salt magnesium and non-sea salt calcium. Cloud top ice super satura- Scattering coefficient (σ ) Nephelometer GMD 550 ARM 1998 pres. ti i dt i d i di d dt d l dt h i ht di t t t Scattering coefficient (σ s ) Nephelometer GMD 550 GMD 1976 p es tion is determined using radiosonde data and cloud top height and ice water content are 10 GMD 1976 pres. tion is determined using radiosonde data, and cloud top height and ice water content are 10 derived from MMCR measurements Cases are limited to those with cloud tops lower than ARM 1998 pres. derived from MMCR measurements. Cases are limited to those with cloud tops lower than ARM 1998 pres. derived from MMCR measurements. Cases are limited to those with cloud tops lower than GMD 1997 pres 2 km and cloud top temperatures below 270 K The distributions illustrate cases with no 1 GMD 1997 pres. 2 km and cloud top temperatures below 270 K. The distributions illustrate cases with no 1 ARM 1998 pres d t (li ht l ) d th ith d tl di (d k l ) d tdit 700 ARM 1998 pres. dust (lighter colors) and those with dust loading (darker colors) and are separated into 700 GMD 1976 dust (lighter colors) and those with dust loading (darker colors), and are separated into GMD 1976 pres. times when the cloud top ice supersaturation was found to be lower than 1 and times 10 GMD 1976 pres. times when the cloud top ice supersaturation was found to be lower than 1 and times 10 ARM 1998 pres times when the cloud top ice supersaturation was found to be lower than 1 and times ARM 1998 pres. when cloud top supersaturation exceeded 1 Next steps involve ensuring that all radio- M lti Filt R t ti Sh d when cloud top supersaturation exceeded 1. Next steps involve ensuring that all radio- Aerosol optical depth (AOD) Multi-Filter Rotating Shadow- 500 N/A ARM ARM 1998-pres sonde measurements are dry bias corrected and including the maximum in cloud ice su Aerosol optical depth (AOD) band Radiometer (MFRSR) 500 N/A ARM ARM 1998-pres. sonde measurements are dry-bias corrected and including the maximum in-cloud ice su- band Radiometer (MFRSR) sonde measurements are dry bias corrected and including the maximum in cloud ice su 1 persaturation instead of only the cloud top value l G l / 1 998 2009 2 persaturation instead of only the cloud-top value. Total mass concentrations Gravimetric analysis N/A PMEL PMEL 1998 2009 2 Total mass concentrations Gravimetric analysis N/A PMEL PMEL 1998 2009 10 10 1 ion chromatography (IC) N/A 1 PMEL PMEL 1998 2009 2 Soluble ion concentrations S ion chromatography (IC) N/A PMEL PMEL 1998 2009 2 10 Soluble ion concentrations Summary 10 Summary Summary Submicron metal concentrations x ray fluorescence (XRF) N/A 1 PMEL PMEL 2003 2008 2 Submicron metal concentrations x-ray fluorescence (XRF) N/A 1 PMEL PMEL 2003 2008 Th ti d f l t th f id h th i di ti ll di t li t f The properties and sources of aerosols at the surface varied each month indicating seasonally disparate aerosol impacts on surface 1 Some years do not have data from all months Includes quality controlled and validated data only The properties and sources of aerosols at the surface varied each month, indicating seasonally disparate aerosol impacts on surface Some years do not have data from all months. Includes quality controlled and validated data only. radiation and cloud formation effects 2 Filter samples have been collected up to the present, currently available analysis ends in 2009 for IC and 2008 for XRF. radiation and cloud formation effects. radiation and cloud formation effects. Winter/spring: long -range transported submicron sea salt mineral dust industrial metals pollution and biomass burning con- Winter/spring: long -range transported submicron sea salt, mineral dust, industrial metals, pollution, and biomass burning, con- l i b f d l t ith hi h t ti fttl b i b d h d ti ti Seasonal Disconnect between Surface and Column Aero current with higher concentrations of total submicron mass number and enhanced extinction Seasonal Disconnect between Surface and Column Aero- current with higher concentrations of total submicron mass, number, and enhanced extinction Seasonal Disconnect between Surface and Column Aero Summer: relatively clean air with influences from small regionally generated biogenic aerosols concurrent with availabil sol Optical Depth Summer: relatively clean air, with influences from small, regionally -generated biogenic aerosols concurrent with availabil- sol Optical Depth i f li h d sol Optical Depth ity of sunlight and open water ity of sunlight and open water. In situ surface aerosol Fall: relatively clean air persists but now with influences from regionally generated supermicron sea salt supporting the In situ surface aerosol Fall: relatively clean air persists, but now with influences from regionally -generated supermicron sea salt, supporting the Fall: relatively clean air persists, but now with influences from regionally generated supermicron sea salt, supporting the measurements can pro- highest single scattering albedos measurements can pro highest single scattering albedos. ide a contin o s and de vide a continuous and de- However the seasonality of aerosols above the boundary layer is shifted indicating different sources aloft versus at the ground vide a continuous and de ld d f bl However, the seasonality of aerosols above the boundary layer is shifted, indicating different sources aloft versus at the ground. tailed record of variability However, the seasonality of aerosols above the boundary layer is shifted, indicating different sources aloft versus at the ground. tailed record of variability i h i l h i l d Preliminary results suggest cloud ice amount is potentially correlated to mineral dust observed at the surface under similar atmos- in physical chemical and Preliminary results suggest cloud ice amount is potentially correlated to mineral dust observed at the surface under similar atmos- in physical, chemical, and h i diti lth h ki dd optical properties and the pheric conditions, although more work is needed. optical properties and the pheric conditions, although more work is needed. optical properties and the l h relationships among Results such as these could be used to constrain models by providing detailed information on the types of aerosols present in the relationships among Results such as these could be used to constrain models by providing detailed information on the types of aerosols present in the th H i th them. However, in the Arctic them. However, in the Arctic. stratified Arctic atmos stratified Arctic atmos- h i ifi t ff t phere significant effects phere, significant effects from aerosols aloft may Rf from aerosols aloft may References Ak ld t from aerosols aloft may References Acknowledgements be overlooked Acknowledgements be overlooked. C JM l A Ch Ph Di i i Creamean J M et al Atmos Chem Phys Disc in preparation Th bl lt h th l l f l li ht ti ti t th f d fl t th t Creamean, J. M. et al., Atmos Chem Phys Disc, in preparation. The blue plot shows the seasonal cycle of aerosol light extinction at the surface and reflects the pat- DeMott P J et al Geoph s Res Lett 30(14) 2003 Thi k tdb th The blue plot shows the seasonal cycle of aerosol light extinction at the surface and reflects the pat DeMott, P. J. et al., Geophys Res Lett, 30(14), 2003. This work was supported by the tern of mass concentrations in sulfate and ammonium shown above right DeMott, P. J. et al., Geophys Res Lett, 30(14), 2003. This work was supported by the tern of mass concentrations in sulfate and ammonium shown above right. McFarquhar G M et al Bull Am Meteorol Soc 92 2011 US Department of Energy Atmos- McFarquhar, G. M. et al., Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 92, 2011. US Department of Energy, Atmos- Th d lti th l l f th l l ti ld th Th ki li ht ti ti i Qi PK t l JG h R At 107 2002 pheric Systems Research (ASR) The red plot is the seasonal cycle of the column aerosol optical depth The peak in light extinction is Quinn P K et al J Geophys Res-Atmos 107 2002 pheric Systems Research (ASR) The red plot is the seasonal cycle of the column aerosol optical depth. The peak in light extinction is Quinn, P. K. et al., J Geophys Res Atmos, 107, 2002. pheric Systems Research (ASR) shifted to later in the season which is likely due to long range transport of biomass burning aerosol Quinn P K et al Atmos Chem Phys 8 1723 1735 2008 Program under award number DE- shifted to later in the season which is likely due to long-range transport of biomass burning aerosol Quinn, P. K. et al., Atmos Chem Phys, 8, 1723-1735, 2008. Program under award number DE shifted to later in the season which is likely due to long range transport of biomass burning aerosol Quinn, P. K. et al., Atmos Chem Phys, 8, 1723 1735, 2008. SC0013306 that remains aloft These aerosol might be more representative of those available to interact with Quinn P K et al Atmos Chem Phys 9 8883 8888 2009 SC0013306. that remains aloft. These aerosol might be more representative of those available to interact with Quinn, P. K. et al., Atmos Chem Phys, 9, 8883-8888, 2009. l d th hti d t th f cloud than what is measured at the surface. cloud than what is measured at the surface.

Olik k i Si Si lOliktkPitSit Si A lOliktokPointSiteScience ... · 2019-08-02 · These aerosol might be more representative of those available to interact with ilabletointeractwith

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Olik k i Si Si lOliktkPitSit Si A lOliktokPointSiteScience ... · 2019-08-02 · These aerosol might be more representative of those available to interact with ilabletointeractwith

Olik k i Si S i lOlikt k P i t Sit S i A lOliktok Point Site Science: AerosolsOliktok Point Site Science: AerosolsOliktok Point Site Science: AerosolsOliktok Point Site Science: Aerosols (1) (2) Oliktok Point Site Science: Aerosols (1) (2)(1) (2) 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2

( ) ( )J i C 1 2 Gij d B 1 2 Alli M C i k 2 M tth Sh 1 2 M tth N 1 2Jessie Creamean1,2 Gijs de Boer1,2 Allison McComiskey2 Matthew Shupe1,2 Matthew Norgren1,2 Jessie Creamean , , Gijs de Boer , , Allison McComiskey , Matthew Shupe , , Matthew Norgren , Jessie Creamean , Gijs de Boer , Allison McComiskey , Matthew Shupe , Matthew Norgren

Introduction Climatology of Surface Aerosol PropertiesIntroduction Climatology of Surface Aerosol PropertiesIntroduction Climatology of Surface Aerosol Properties gy pEvaluating Arctic aerosol properties has implications for cloud formation resulting in impacts on cloud Extension of previous work by Quinn et al (2002; 2009) using entire record of aerosol chemical physical and optical propertiesEvaluating Arctic aerosol properties has implications for cloud formation, resulting in impacts on cloud Extension of previous work by Quinn et al. (2002; 2009) using entire record of aerosol chemical, physical, and optical properties. g p p p , g plif i i i i d di i f i (Q i l 2008 M F h l 2011)

p y Q ( ; ) g , p y , p p plifetime precipitation processes and radiative forcing (Quinn et al 2008; McFarquhar et al 2011) Th fi b l h th i t thl i ti d l ti hi b t ll l t t Blifetime, precipitation processes, and radiative forcing (Quinn et al., 2008; McFarquhar et al. 2011) The figure below shows the inter-monthly variations and relationships between all aerosol measurements at Barrowp p p g ( q ) The figure below shows the inter monthly variations and relationships between all aerosol measurements at Barrow. Further many remaining uncertainties exist regarding modeled and observed Arctic aerosol properFurther, many remaining uncertainties exist regarding modeled and observed Arctic aerosol proper-Further, many remaining uncertainties exist regarding modeled and observed Arctic aerosol properties thus a better understanding of aerosol properties and sources in the Arctic is neededties, thus, a better understanding of aerosol properties and sources in the Arctic is needed. , , g p pH t h i li t l f l h i l h i l d ti l tiHere, we present a comprehensive climatology of aerosol physical, chemical, and optical propertiesHere, we present a comprehensive climatology of aerosol physical, chemical, and optical properties along the North Slope of Alaska at the joint NOAA and DOE ARM Barrow facility We also investigatealong the North Slope of Alaska at the joint NOAA and DOE ARM Barrow facility. We also investigate g p j y gth t ti l f l t (i i l d t) t i fl l d i f ti i i it dthe potential for aerosol type (i e mineral dust) to influence cloud ice formation using in situ and re-the potential for aerosol type (i.e., mineral dust) to influence cloud ice formation using in situ and rep yp ( ) gmote sensing measurements (DeMott et al 2003)mote sensing measurements (DeMott et al., 2003).mote sensing measurements (DeMott et al., 2003).

A l Ob ti t BAerosol Observations at BarrowAerosol Observations at BarrowAerosol Observations at Barrow A l b ti t B t d b k t 1976 S T bl 1 f th l t li t f lAerosol observations at Barrow extend back to 1976. See Table 1 for the complete list of aerosolAerosol observations at Barrow extend back to 1976. See Table 1 for the complete list of aerosol measurements and where data were accessedmeasurements and where data were accessed.

Instrument/ Size cutMeasurement Instrument/ λ (nm) Size cut Agency Data source Years available1Measurement Method λ (nm) (µm) Agency Data source Years available Method (µm)

Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer 2007 2009 2012Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (S S) N/A 1 TROPOS GMD 2007 – 2009, 2012 – (SMPS) N/A 1 TROPOS GMD pres.

Particle number concentrations(SMPS) pres. Particle number concentrations

(CN) GMD GMD 1976(CN) Condensation particle Counter GMD GMD 1976 – pres.Condensation particle Counter N/A 10

GMD GMD 1976 pres. p(CPC) N/A 10

ARM (AOS) ARM 1998 pres(CPC) ARM (AOS) ARM 1998 – pres. 2007 2009 2012Particle size distributions SMPS N/A 1 TROPOS GMD 2007 – 2009, 2012 – Particle size distributions SMPS N/A 1 TROPOS GMD ,

prespres. 1 2006 – pres

4701

GMD2006 – pres.

470 GMD 10 2006 p es10 2006 – pres. p

GMD 1997 – pres.1

GMD 1997 pres.

P ti l S t Ab ti Ph 550/1

ARM 1998 – presAbsorption coefficient (σ ) Particle Soot Absorption Pho- GMD550/ ARM 1998 – pres. Absorption coefficient (σa) p

tometer (PSAP) GMD 528 GMD 1988 prestometer (PSAP) 528 10

GMD 1988 – pres. 10

pARM 1998ARM 1998 – pres.ARM 1998 pres.

1 2006 – pres660

1 GMD

2006 pres. 660 GMD

10 2006 pres E l i h I f A h i D Cl d I10 2006 – pres. Evaluating the Impact of Atmospheric Dust on Cloud IceGMD 1997 Evaluating the Impact of Atmospheric Dust on Cloud Ice1

GMD 1997 – pres. Evaluating the Impact of Atmospheric Dust on Cloud Ice 1

p g p p1

ARM 1998 – pres Here we combine information from NOAA filter samples with ARM remote sensors and450ARM 1998 pres. Here we combine information from NOAA filter samples with ARM remote sensors and450 GMD 1976 pres

Here we combine information from NOAA filter samples with ARM remote sensors and 10

GMD 1976 – pres. NWS and ARM radiosondes to evaluate whether there is a noticeable increase in in-cloud10 ARM 1998

NWS and ARM radiosondes to evaluate whether there is a noticeable increase in in-cloud ARM 1998 – pres. ice amo nt fo time pe iods ith d st loading D st loading is based on the mass concenp ice amount for time periods with dust loading. Dust loading is based on the mass concen-GMD 1997 – pres. ice amount for time periods with dust loading. Dust loading is based on the mass concen

1GMD 1997 pres.

tration of non sea salt magnesium and non sea salt calcium Cloud top ice super satura1 ARM 1998 – pres tration of non-sea salt magnesium and non-sea salt calcium. Cloud top ice super satura-

Scattering coefficient (σ ) Nephelometer GMD550ARM 1998 – pres. g p p

ti i d t i d i di d d t d l d t h i ht d i t t tScattering coefficient (σs) Nephelometer GMD 550 GMD 1976 p es tion is determined using radiosonde data and cloud top height and ice water content are

10GMD 1976 – pres. tion is determined using radiosonde data, and cloud top height and ice water content are

10 p g g

derived from MMCR measurements Cases are limited to those with cloud tops lower thanARM 1998 – pres. derived from MMCR measurements. Cases are limited to those with cloud tops lower thanARM 1998 pres. derived from MMCR measurements. Cases are limited to those with cloud tops lower than GMD 1997 – pres 2 km and cloud top temperatures below 270 K The distributions illustrate cases with no1GMD 1997 – pres. 2 km and cloud top temperatures below 270 K. The distributions illustrate cases with no 1 ARM 1998 pres

p pd t (li ht l ) d th ith d t l di (d k l ) d t d i t700

ARM 1998 – pres. dust (lighter colors) and those with dust loading (darker colors) and are separated into700 p

GMD 1976dust (lighter colors) and those with dust loading (darker colors), and are separated into

GMD 1976 – pres. times when the cloud top ice supersaturation was found to be lower than 1 and times10GMD 1976 pres. times when the cloud top ice supersaturation was found to be lower than 1 and times10 ARM 1998 – pres

times when the cloud top ice supersaturation was found to be lower than 1 and times ARM 1998 pres. when cloud top supersaturation exceeded 1 Next steps involve ensuring that all radio-

M lti Filt R t ti Sh dwhen cloud top supersaturation exceeded 1. Next steps involve ensuring that all radio-

Aerosol optical depth (AOD) Multi-Filter Rotating Shadow- 500 N/A ARM ARM 1998-pres sonde measurements are dry bias corrected and including the maximum in cloud ice suAerosol optical depth (AOD) gband Radiometer (MFRSR) 500 N/A ARM ARM 1998-pres. sonde measurements are dry-bias corrected and including the maximum in-cloud ice su-band Radiometer (MFRSR) sonde measurements are dry bias corrected and including the maximum in cloud ice su

1 persaturation instead of only the cloud top valuel G l /

1 998 20092 persaturation instead of only the cloud-top value.

Total mass concentrations Gravimetric analysis N/A PMEL PMEL 1998 – 20092 p y pTotal mass concentrations Gravimetric analysis N/A PMEL PMEL 1998 2009

1010 1

ion chromatography (IC) N/A1

PMEL PMEL 1998 20092Soluble ion concentrations

Sion chromatography (IC) N/A PMEL PMEL 1998 – 20092

10Soluble ion concentrations

Summary10 SummarySummary Submicron metal concentrations x ray fluorescence (XRF) N/A 1 PMEL PMEL 2003 20082 ySubmicron metal concentrations x-ray fluorescence (XRF) N/A 1 PMEL PMEL 2003 – 2008

Th ti d f l t th f i d h th i di ti ll di t l i t fThe properties and sources of aerosols at the surface varied each month indicating seasonally disparate aerosol impacts on surface1Some years do not have data from all months Includes quality controlled and validated data only The properties and sources of aerosols at the surface varied each month, indicating seasonally disparate aerosol impacts on surface Some years do not have data from all months. Includes quality controlled and validated data only.

radiation and cloud formation effects2Filter samples have been collected up to the present, currently available analysis ends in 2009 for IC and 2008 for XRF. radiation and cloud formation effects.p p p , y y radiation and cloud formation effects.

Winter/spring: long-range transported submicron sea salt mineral dust industrial metals pollution and biomass burning con-Winter/spring: long-range transported submicron sea salt, mineral dust, industrial metals, pollution, and biomass burning, con-l i b f d l

/ p g g g p , , , p , g,t ith hi h t ti f t t l b i b d h d ti tiSeasonal Disconnect between Surface and Column Aero current with higher concentrations of total submicron mass number and enhanced extinctionSeasonal Disconnect between Surface and Column Aero- current with higher concentrations of total submicron mass, number, and enhanced extinction Seasonal Disconnect between Surface and Column Aero

Summer: relatively clean air w ith influences from small regionally generated biogenic aerosols concurrent with availabilsol Optical Depth Summer: relatively clean air, w ith influences from small, regionally-generated biogenic aerosols concurrent with availabil-sol Optical Depth y , , g y g gi f li h d

sol Optical Depth ity of sunlight and open water

p pity of sunlight and open water.

In situ surface aerosol Fall: relatively clean air persists but now w ith influences from regionally generated supermicron sea salt supporting theIn situ surface aerosol Fall: relatively clean air persists, but now w ith influences from regionally-generated supermicron sea salt, supporting theFall: relatively clean air persists, but now w ith influences from regionally generated supermicron sea salt, supporting the measurements can pro- highest single scattering albedosmeasurements can pro highest single scattering albedos. pide a contin o s and de g g gvide a continuous and de-

However the seasonality of aerosols above the boundary layer is shifted indicating different sources aloft versus at the groundvide a continuous and de

l d d f b l However, the seasonality of aerosols above the boundary layer is shifted, indicating different sources aloft versus at the ground.tailed record of variability However, the seasonality of aerosols above the boundary layer is shifted, indicating different sources aloft versus at the ground. tailed record of variability yi h i l h i l d Preliminary results suggest cloud ice amount is potentially correlated to mineral dust observed at the surface under similar atmos-in physical chemical and Preliminary results suggest cloud ice amount is potentially correlated to mineral dust observed at the surface under similar atmos-in physical, chemical, and y gg p y

h i diti lth h k i d doptical properties and the pheric conditions, although more work is needed.optical properties and the pheric conditions, although more work is needed. optical properties and the l hrelationships among Results such as these could be used to constrain models by providing detailed information on the types of aerosols present in therelationships among Results such as these could be used to constrain models by providing detailed information on the types of aerosols present in the p g

th H i th esu ts suc as t ese cou d be used to co st a ode s by p o d g deta ed o at o o t e types o ae oso s p ese t t ethem. However, in the Arcticthem. However, in the Arctic. stratified Arctic atmosstratified Arctic atmos-h i ifi t ff tphere significant effectsphere, significant effects

from aerosols aloft may R ffrom aerosols aloft may References A k l d tfrom aerosols aloft may References Acknowledgementsbe overlooked e e e ces Acknowledgements be overlooked.

C J M l A Ch Ph Di i ic o edge e ts

Creamean J M et al Atmos Chem Phys Disc in preparationTh bl l t h th l l f l li ht ti ti t th f d fl t th t Creamean, J. M. et al., Atmos Chem Phys Disc, in preparation. The blue plot shows the seasonal cycle of aerosol light extinction at the surface and reflects the pat- y p pDeMott P J et al Geoph s Res Lett 30(14) 2003 Thi k t d b th

The blue plot shows the seasonal cycle of aerosol light extinction at the surface and reflects the patDeMott, P. J. et al., Geophys Res Lett, 30(14), 2003. This work was supported by thetern of mass concentrations in sulfate and ammonium shown above right DeMott, P. J. et al., Geophys Res Lett, 30(14), 2003. This work was supported by the tern of mass concentrations in sulfate and ammonium shown above right. McFarquhar G M et al Bull Am Meteorol Soc 92 2011 US Department of Energy Atmos-

te o ass co ce t at o s su ate a d a o u s o abo e g tMcFarquhar, G. M. et al., Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 92, 2011. US Department of Energy, Atmos-

Th d l t i th l l f th l l ti l d th Th k i li ht ti ti iq , , , ,

Q i P K t l J G h R At 107 2002p gy,

pheric Systems Research (ASR)The red plot is the seasonal cycle of the column aerosol optical depth The peak in light extinction is Quinn P K et al J Geophys Res-Atmos 107 2002 pheric Systems Research (ASR)The red plot is the seasonal cycle of the column aerosol optical depth. The peak in light extinction is Quinn, P. K. et al., J Geophys Res Atmos, 107, 2002. pheric Systems Research (ASR) shifted to later in the season which is likely due to long range transport of biomass burning aerosol Quinn P K et al Atmos Chem Phys 8 1723 1735 2008 Program under award number DE-shifted to later in the season which is likely due to long-range transport of biomass burning aerosol Quinn, P. K. et al., Atmos Chem Phys, 8, 1723-1735, 2008. Program under award number DEshifted to later in the season which is likely due to long range transport of biomass burning aerosol Quinn, P. K. et al., Atmos Chem Phys, 8, 1723 1735, 2008.

SC0013306that remains aloft These aerosol might be more representative of those available to interact with Quinn P K et al Atmos Chem Phys 9 8883 8888 2009 SC0013306.that remains aloft. These aerosol might be more representative of those available to interact with Quinn, P. K. et al., Atmos Chem Phys, 9, 8883-8888, 2009. SC00 3306g pl d th h t i d t th f

Q , , y , , ,cloud than what is measured at the surface.cloud than what is measured at the surface.