OM Case Presentation_Group9

  • Upload
    ptgoel

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    1/12

    Presented

    ByGroup 9

    Moitrayee Majumdar (wmp7104)

    Ramji Natarajan (wmp 7122 )

    Sandeep Koul (wmp7124)

    Sanjeev Kumar Panda (wmp 7125)Sarthak Swain (wmp 7126)

    IIM Lucknow, Noida Campus

    CASE Presentation O & MServices Marketing Term VIII

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    2/12

    Contents

    Case Narratives

    Question 1

    Question 2

    1

    2

    3

    Question 34

    Question 45

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    3/12

    CaseNarratives

    Owens & Minor (O &M) Distributor of surgical and medical supplies to hospitals and other

    health care facilities.

    Due to changing demand from customers, company facing increased operating costs,resulting in lower profit margins and even losses.

    In 1993, O&M recorded an $18 million profit, which was reduced to a loss of $11 million in

    1995.

    In an effort to resume profitability, O&M is evaluating alternatives to cost-plus pricing.

    Cost-plus pricing does not reflect the true cost of the services provided by O&M. Customers are demanding more of O&M while expecting the price structure to stay the

    same.

    The new method of pricing, called Activity-Based Costing (ABC) and Activity-Based Pricing

    (ABP) will increase efficiency in the supply chain and reduce overhead expenses.

    Ideal, a large hospital buying group, has put their supply contract out for bid, presenting

    an enormous potential revenue opportunity for O&M if it can undersell its competitors towin the contract.

    O&M believes that by adopting this new pricing model, Ideal will save money.

    Customers would be required to invest significant resources to adjust their current business

    practices to fit the ABP model.

    The challenge lies in convincing Ideal of this, and then gaining their commitment to

    implement the model.

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    4/12

    What were the major drivers of cost to serve customers, besides those

    leveraged by O&M?

    Cost of handling different boxes were different.

    Managing inventory

    Product returnsTracking and verifying customer prices for contracted products purchases.

    Rebate

    Type of delivery needed: Bulk, Stockless, Just in Time

    Number of PO per month

    Number of line per PO

    Number of deliveries per week

    Method of order (mail, telephone, or electronic).

    Interest cost from carrying receivables and inventory

    Question 1

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    5/12

    Given the Menu based pricing started by O&M, what were the other

    alternative methods of pricing that they could have considered? Details

    required for each method recommended.

    The other method could be perceived value pricing where price of

    distribution would also be tied to type or level of service one needed.

    Example: Price (fixed by Manuf. and Customer) *7% (distributer margin) + service charge

    (based on perceived value of different services provided by distributor).

    One more method could be Urgency as a pricing strategy where price willhave a mark-up based on the level of urgency.

    Example: Mark-up of x% to cover the support level expenses + additional profit

    analogous to Time based Tier pricing.

    Question 2

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    6/12

    MANUFACTURER PRICE + MARK UP(ADDED BY DISTRIBUTER) = SELLING PRICE

    Dominant form of pricing in medical/ surgical distribution industry was costplus

    Distributer added a 7% fee charging the customer for the delivered product

    Cost Plus Model

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    7/12

    Cost Plus Model Advantages and Limitations

    Limitations

    Cost plus tide the exes to the value

    of the product rather then the value

    of the service .

    To avoid paying high distribution

    percentage on expensive product

    the customer would buy then

    directly from the manufacturer.

    That left O & M with low margin

    and inexpensive products

    Advantages

    Easy to calculate

    Minimal information requirements

    Easy to administer

    Tends to stabilize markets -insulated from demand variations

    and competitive factors

    Insures seller against unpredictable,

    or unexpected later costs

    Ethical advantages

    Simplicity

    It is readily available

    Price increases can be justified in

    terms of cost increases

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    8/12

    Activity-based costing (ABC) is a costing model that identifies activitiesin an organization and assigns the cost of each activity resource to all

    products and services according to the actual consumption by each

    It assigns more indirect costing(over heads) into direct cost.

    ABC Costing

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    9/12

    ABC Advantages and Limitations

    Limitations

    Even in activity-based costing,

    some overhead costs are difficult to

    assign to products and

    customers..('business sustaining)

    Wastage will be more visible which

    may not be desired by some

    executives

    Advantages

    It helps to identify inefficient

    products, departments and

    activities

    It helps to allocate more

    resources on profitable products,

    departments and activities

    It helps to control the costs at an

    individual level and on a

    departmental level

    It helps to find unnecessary costs It helps fixing price of product or

    service scientifically

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    10/12

    What were the effects of duration of use of the new pricing system on

    customers?

    Customer was able to weed out non value adding activities and was able to

    fine tune activities to minimize cost.

    This process enhanced relationship between distributor and customer.High level of trust was built between parties.

    Huge investments were made.

    Customer outsource portion of management activities related to material

    management to those who did it in best possible way.

    Question 3

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    11/12

    Optimum Point

    Question 4

    What method of setting the price would be most effective for each of the

    services?

    In order to find most effective price for a particular service, one has to

    find out service level that costs lowest to both customer and distributor.

    One has to find out economic ordering point not only considering

    customer activity and inventory but also activity and inventory ofdistributor.

    Bulk order low cost for

    distributor but high inventory

    cost for customer

    Just in time order low cost

    for customer but high cost

    for distributor.

  • 7/30/2019 OM Case Presentation_Group9

    12/12

    Thank You