Upload
duongkhuong
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
On the Cover
Cover image: Hieronymus Bosch (1450-1516)
Allegory of luxury, central panel of The Garden of Earthly
Delights, c. 1503-04 triptych.
Museo del Prado, Madrid
Gianni Dagli Orti / The Art Archive at Art Resource, NY
We know little about the thoughts of Hieronymus
Bosch, an inmensely talented painter who lived in the
Netherlands during the Northern Renaissance. The
fragment reproduced on the cover is from a tryptych
(The Garden of Earthly Delights) that he painted around
1503 (Bosch did not date his paintings). Following the
Dutch revolt against the Spanish occupiers the painting
was brought to the Escorial by the Duque de Alba and
eventually found its way to the Prado Museum where it
is today. The three panels of The Garden depict Adam
and Eve (left), a utopian garden of delights (centre) and
hell (right).
The decoding of this painting has been the subject of
much research and speculation over time. As befits the
Christian culture of the time it has been generally
interpreted as showing - from left to right -Creation, the
excesses of carnal pleasure and the punishment that will
follow.
But one can question fairly if this is what Bosch
intended. As you would expect, the early Spanish writers
who became acquainted with this painting referred to it
with a morally inbued name: "The Lust’’. Some
interpreters of this work deduced that Bosch must have
been a member of a sect of pleasure seekers, the
Adamites, others went to posit that Bosch was
schizophrenic or even a closet gay.
The left and center panels share the same horizon as if the
events related there happened at the same site: the utopian
paradise. Perhaps he tells us how the world would have
been had Adam and Eve had been left in peace in their
Paradise. In the center panel men, women and all sorts of
exotic animals frolic around a pool enjoying fruits, music
and sex in an environment of innocence and joy.
Proportion and perspective are ignored. The story is told
in small vignettes. There are gigantic birds and fruit, fish
walk on land and birds swim in the water. The bodies of
the dancers and lovers have an air of etherealness to
them. In contrast the folks tortured and roasting in Hell,
in the right panel, are not engaging in carefree love
games: they are painted as individuals who indulge in
gluttony, gambling, gossiping and other ethical and moral
transgressions. None is engaged in free love.
This painting was made at a time when the principle of
Reason was eroding the primacy of Faith and Obedience
dictated by a Church that had linked sex and sin since the
time of Adam and Eve punishment away from Paradise.
The primatologist Fran de Waal commenting of this
painting wrote: "It is almost as if the painter is saying that,
yes, the world is full of misery and sin, and sin will be
punished, but don’t look at carnal love as its source". The
great thinker Erasmus of Rotterdam who lived a stone
throw from Bosch in the same town and must have known
and befriended him, also decried in his writings the
Church’s dictum that sexual enjoyment was shameful and
had its origin in sin: "As if marriage, whose function cannot
be fulfilled without these incitements, did not rise above
blame". And he asked, "In other living creatures, where do
these enticements come from? From Nature or Sin?
The images of exotic animals and strange bodies and
objects, the cryptic and enigmatic symbols, have
attracted the attention of surrealists and some, like Joan
Miro, and Salvador Dali, have repeated his imagery in
their works. It is possible to see the Garden of Earthly
Delights as a story told by a painter that, although he
had to be prudent not to incur in the wrath of the
dominant Church, would have agreed with the Utopia of
his contemporary Thomas More.
R. Berguer
A9