30
Galfenol Technologies at ETREMA Products StateoftheArt & Future Direction Eric Summers, VP & Chief Materials Engineer ETREMA Proprietary Information Galfenol Research Initiatives Meeting, Oct. 27, 2011 1

ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation on the state-of-the-art of Galfenol Technology. Prepared in October, 2011.

Citation preview

Page 1: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Galfenol Technologies at ETREMA ProductsState‐of‐the‐Art & Future Direction

Eric Summers, VP & Chief Materials Engineer

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

1

Page 2: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

• Special thanks to ONR for their support of Galfenol Research

• Acknowledgements:• NSWC – Carderock, Magnetic Materials Group including Art Clark• Ames Laboratory, Dr. Tom Lograsso• Galfenol MURI members lead by Dr. Alison Flatau• Kanazawa University, Dr. Toshiyuki Ueno• All other researchers who have contributed to our body of knowledge

• Remember: Clark AE, Restorff JB, Wun‐Fogle M, Lograsso TA, Schlagel DL (2000) IEEE Trans Magn 36:3238

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

2

Page 3: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Presentation Topics•Galfenol processing techniques•Properties• Future direction of Galfenol technology

•Galfenol technology roadmap•Commercialization ET

REMA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

3

Page 4: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Magnetostriction vs. Composition (single crystal)Fe1-xGa(0.15 ≤ x ≤ 0.20)

• ETREMA’s efforts have focused on the first magnetostrictive peak between 15 at% Ga and 20 at% Ga

• Galfenol alloys available at this compositional range

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

3/2λ 1

00(x 10‐

6 )

x

Furnace CooledQuenchedDirectionally Solidified (Unannealed)Quenched in BrineFurnace Cooled, Multi‐phase

Fe100‐xGax

H = 15 kOe

Single crystal data courtesy of NSWC Carderock Magnetic Materials Group

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

4

Page 5: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Galfenol Alloy Feedstock• Various feedstock alloys and shapes produced

• Bottom pour unit with 2 kg capacity – chill cast into various mold geometries

• Equipment limits capacity that can be produced

FSZM

Bridgman

Rolling Ingot

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

5

Page 6: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Primary Production MethodAdvanced Bridgman Process• Directional solidification method

• Strong <100> texture• Primary composition = 18.4 at% Ga (nominal)• Other compositions around 1stpeak can be produced

• Typical geometry: 24 mm dia x 250 mm length

• Current equipment limits rod sizes that can be produced• Labor intensive

Photo of Galfenol being produced via Bridgman Process

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

6

Page 7: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

EBSD ComparisonAs‐Cast Feedstock Alloy Bridgman Rod

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

7

Page 8: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Typical Quasi-static Curves• As‐grown Bridgman rod; Fe – 18.4 at% Ga nominal composition

Strain vs. Magnetic Field Flux Density vs. Magnetic Field

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

8

Page 9: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Comparison to Terfenol-D• Less field required to reach

saturation• Larger pre‐stresses necessary

• Larger saturation flux density• Higher permeability• Less hysteresis

Strain vs. Magnetic Field Flux Density vs. Magnetic Field

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

9

Page 10: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Galfenol PropertiesSaturation Strain 200 – 250 ppm at 48 MPa applied compressive load

Piezomagnetic Constant, d33 15 – 30 nm/A, lower values at larger stresses

Saturating Magnetic Field 100 – 250 Oe, value depends upon stress applied with larger stresses requiring high magnetic fields to reach saturation

Saturation Magnetic Flux Density 1.5 Tesla

Magnetic Permeability, μr 75 – 100, lower values at larger stresses

Coercivity, Hc 10 Oe

Hysteresis (major loop) 1000 J/m3

Curie Temp. ≈ 950 K

Density 7800 kg/m3

Hard Young’s Modulus 75 GPa

Soft Young’s Modulus ≈ 40 GPa

Tensile Strength ≈ 350 MPa

Elongation ≈ 1%

10

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

• Typical properties of polycrystalline Galfenol (Fe81.6Ga18.4)• As‐grown material via Bridgman Process

Page 11: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Galfenol LaminationCritical Skin Depth w ith Frequency

100

1000

10000

100000

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5Critical Skin Depth, mm

Freq

uenc

y, H

z

Terfenol-DGalfenol

11

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

Benefits• Mechanical robustness• High permeability

• efficient magnetic circuit• Low magnetic hysteresis

• ~10x less than Terfenol‐D

Disadvantages• Eddy current losses• Critical skin depth (20 kHz)

• δGalfenol = 0.38mm (0.015”)• δTerfenol = 1.23mm (0.048”)

• ¼ λsat

Material Permeability (μr)

Resistivity (ρ)

Galfenol 75-100 8.5x10-7 Ω·m

Terfenol 2-10 6.0x10-7 Ω·m

Page 12: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Galfenol Rolling• Viable high volume, low cost production method• Highly textured microstructure; (110)<001> RD (Goss)• Large grains• Large magnetostrictions measured in individual sheet samples; > 250 ppm

• Typical sheet dimensions: 11” length x 3” width x 0.014” thick• Investigating methods to produce thinner sheets

• Lab‐scale process – very labor intensive

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

12

Page 13: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Rolled Sheet Stacks• Nominal Ga content: 18 at%

• Multi‐stage rolling to 0.36 mm (0.014”)

• Textured sheets via HT• Sample sectioning

• 10 mm x 15 mm• Laminated sheet stack assembly• 20 laminates/stack with ~35 µm (0.0015”) bond line 13

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

RD

RD

TD ND

Page 14: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Stack Characterization

14

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

λsat = 215 ppm

d33 = 20 nm/A

Msat = 1.3 Tµr = 85

Page 15: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Machining ExamplesGalfenol

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

15

Page 16: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Welding & Forging

Laser welding courtesy of DRDC Atlantic

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

16

Page 17: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Stress Annealing at ETREMA• Stress annealing process builds in a compressive stress into the Galfenol sample (referred to as an ‘uniaxial anisotropy’)• Result: full magnetostrictive performance without an extrinsic compressive stress applied

• Good magnetostrictive performance out into tension• Maximum built‐in stress achieved = 64 MPa

• Typical = 45 MPa

• Process can be tailored for a certain stress range• ETREMA has successfully stress annealed Galfenol alloys from 15 at% to 18.4 at% Ga• Including ternary alloys containing aluminum

• Current equipment limits length of a stress annealed specimen to 125 mm

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

17

Page 18: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Galfenol in Tension

Test data courtesy NSWC – Carderock Magnetic Materials Group

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

18

Page 19: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

FUTURE DIRECTION OF GALFENOL TECHNOLOGY ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

19

Page 20: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Magnetic Field Annealing• Magnetic field annealing (FA) processes under investigation at ETREMA• Results consistent with efforts accomplished under MURI

• Finalizing process parameters• Currently, small experimental setup available for field annealing samples• 6.35 mm dia x 50 mm length, typical FA geometry

3” x 3” x 6” chamber for FA

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

20

Page 21: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Corner Stress Test Results

Test data courtesy NSWC – Carderock Magnetic Materials Group

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

21

Page 22: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Field vs. Stress AnnealingStrain vs. Magnetic Field Flux Density vs. Magnetic Field

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

22

Page 23: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Temperature Effects

FA sample, 200°C (not shown)‐755 hrs exposure, < 5% drop in λsat measured ET

REMA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

23

Page 24: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Elevated Temperature Properties• Inquiries into designing Galfenol actuators that can operate under extreme conditions; such as elevated temperature

• Magnetic property characterization at elevated temperatures• Quasi‐static testing up to 400°C• λ and B versus H, d33 and μr to be studied

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

24

Page 25: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Fe-Ga-Al/Fe-Al Alloys• Reduction in alloy cost critical for acceptance in commercial applications

• Today’s Ga market price: $800 ‐$1000/ kg• Purchased at significant quantities (50

kg lots)• Prices trending up

• M.D. Brooks, E. Summers, R. Meloy, J. Mosley, “Aluminum additions in polycrystalline iron‐gallium (Galfenol) alloys,” Proc. SPIE 6929, 69291T (2008)• Focus on small diameter, 6.35mm,

FSZM samples• Fe80.6‐81.6Ga9.8‐13.8Al4.9‐9.8• Difficulty achieving consistent texture

• Scale‐up to Advance Bridgman stage, evaluate properties

25

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

Page 26: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Galfenol Wire Fabrication

26

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

• Part of a Phase II SBIR effort on energy harvesting

• Develop wire fabrication processing for Galfenol alloys• ETREMA/Ames Lab

• Several continuous feet of wire produced; 10 at% Ga

• Early on in process development

• Transition partner identified and interested in scaling‐up process if demand exists

Photos of the 0.014” diameter wire produced of the Fe90Ga10

After drawing

After HT

Page 27: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Galfenol (a non-REE smart technology)• Supply of Terbium and Dysprosium potentially a problem in the foreseeable future

• Gallium does not have the same supply risk

Figures copied from US Dept. of Energy, “Critical Materials Strategy – December 2010”, p. 8

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

27

Page 28: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Galfenol Technology Roadmap6.3 (Technology Development)

6.2 (Advanced Research)

6.1 (Basic Research)

Galfenol Discovery

Processes Established

Actuators Energy Harvesters/Sensors

Properties Characterized

Multifunctional Structures

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

28

Page 29: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Applications DevelopmentETREMA• Significant interest in using Galfenol for energy harvesting• Medical device tool in early development stage (actuator)• Very low frequency sources for US Navy

In all cases…costs to produce must be lowered• Reduce raw material costs• Scale‐up production

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011

29

Page 30: ONR DI Present Oct 2011

Technology Commercialization• Current processing technologies nearing a cross‐road

• Alloying, Bridgman, Rolling, Stress Annealing, etc…• Only capable of producing small quantities

• Process scale‐up absolutely necessary to meet commercial application quantity and pricing requirements

• Scale‐up will require investment in equipment and infrastructure ($)• Difficult to obtain $$$ in today’s low‐risk economic environment

• End‐users must be open to negotiating and executing Supply Agreements

30

ETRE

MA Prop

rietary Inform

ation ‐

Galfeno

l Research Initiatives

Meetin

g, Oct. 27, 2011