15
Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA ONR Advanced Distributed Learning Eva L. Baker Intellectual and Social Capital: Opportunities 2003 Regents of the University of California UCLA CRESST National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing

ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ONR Advanced Distributed Learning. Intellectual and Social Capital: Opportunities. Eva L. Baker. ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA. UCLA CRESST National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

ONR/NETC Planning Meeting18 July, 2003

UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

ONR Advanced Distributed Learning

Eva L. Baker

Intellectual and Social

Capital: Opportunities

2003 Regents of the University of California

UCLA CRESST

National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and

Student Testing

Page 2: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

2Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Intellectual Capital

• Fund of knowledge, skills, and cognitive propensities—analogous to ROI

• CRESST focus for ONR– Content understanding– Problem solving– Teamwork– Communication– Metacognition

Page 3: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

3Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Intellectual Capital

ContentUnderstanding

ProblemSolving

Teamwork andCollaboration

MetacognitionCommunication

Learning

Page 4: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

4Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Social Capital

• Team performance and skills• Networking and information

sharing• Trust• Efficacy (can do)• Adaptive communication• Environmental stress

management• Leadership roles• Effort

Page 5: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

5Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Organizational Development and the Creation of Social

Capital

• Both intellectual and social capital needed

• Social capital is the sizzle• Social capital interacts with

individual differences• Individual differences in the past

has been conceived as general traits or traits that come into play on certain occasions

Page 6: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

6Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Trust

EfficacyNetworks

EffortAdaptive

Communication

LearningOrganization

Leadership

Social Capital

Teamwork

Page 7: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

7Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Measurement of Social Capital

• In institutions (e.g., schools), as a component of effectiveness

• In programs, as the context and outcome of quality instruction

• In organizations, to improve effectiveness

Page 8: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

8Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

What’s New?

• Not trait-, state-, personality-focused• Componential and therefore

instruction-sensitive• Interactive with intellectual capital

formation• Measurement should be iterative and

focus on bottom-up cycles of reporting

• Organizations put self forward like awardees

Page 9: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

9Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Program

• Design analytic framework for evaluating social capital, development, duration, predictive elements

• Contrast high-functioning with low-functioning systems to discriminate key predictors

• Create measures for self-assessment and improvement of individuals, teams, and organizations

Page 10: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

10Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Components of Social Capital

• Individual behaviors (motivated, persistent, resilient, altruistic)

• Individual meta processes (intellectual and emotional awareness and control)

• Knowledge of how to make social systems work

Page 11: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

11Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

• Measurement of Team Performance

– Knowledge maps for team cognition•Content knowledge

– Team process measured by pre-specified messages or online text analysis, e.g., latent semantic analysis E-Rater (ETS)

– Automated generated and scored After-Action Reviews

0

50

100

1st

Qtr

4th

Qtr

East

West

North

Opportunities

Page 12: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

12Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Opportunities (cont.)

• Dynamic Testing of Team Performance– Vygotsky (ZPD), feedback (O’Neil),

help seeking (Webb)

• Cognitive Demands of Psychomotor Tasks (rifle marksmanship and SEALS)– Brief SEALS August 14, 2003, for

possible joint program

Page 13: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

13Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Opportunities (cont.)

• Comparative Testing of Authoring Systems– Top Down

• Ontology, task analysis, experts

– Bottom Up• “Repurposing” simulations

– Dependent measures• Outcome of instruction is learning

• Outcome of assessment is reliable and valid decisions

• Online Analysis and Reporting

Page 14: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

14Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Psychometrics of Simulation

• Psychometric Issues– Validity and accuracy– Design economies– Technical comparability

and equating– Estimation of difficulty– Generalization and

characteristics across topics, contexts, prior knowledge

– Sampling– Scaling – New functional approaches

to norming

• Online administration, diagnostic/ diagnostic/

scoring, reporting prescriptive prescriptive (AAR)

Individual Training Collective Training

Page 15: ONR/NETC Planning Meeting 18 July, 2003 UCLA/CRESST, Los Angeles, CA

15Baker ONR/NETC July 03 v.4 2003 Regents of the University of California

Opportunities (cont.)

Standardizing Quality

• Alignment (R&D)• Linguistics• Search capacity• Evaluation (program

assessment)• 5 Vector mixed models