Upload
winka
View
48
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Ontologizing Ontolog Content April 20, 2006. Sketch #1 A Roadmap to an Ontolog Thesaurus Bob Smith, Ph.D. [email protected] CSU/Tall Tree Labs. Observations. Denise Bedford’s inventory of content indicates a very rich collection; Many different disciplines represented; - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 1
Ontologizing Ontolog ContentApril 20, 2006
Sketch #1
A Roadmap to an Ontolog Thesaurus
Bob Smith, [email protected]/Tall Tree Labs
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 2
Observations
• Denise Bedford’s inventory of content indicates a very rich collection;
• Many different disciplines represented;• Implies a great diversity of meanings;• And an opportunity to consider:
– Building on the Upper Ontology Summit treaty and next steps;
– Developing a Taxo-Thesaurus project and “conforming” schema as a Roadmap/Decision Scenario using existing Ontological Roadmaps.
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 3
What questions to ask?What each answer might imply?
• Where are “we” now and where do we want or need to evolve in terms of an Ontology Roadmap?– Jim Hendler believes…..[ SemTech 06]– Leo Obrst believes…. [ Ontolog Forum 1-12-06]– Elisa Kendall & Debra McGuiness believes…Ontology
101 Revised [ SemTech 06 ]• What resources does it take to move from one
level to the next level?– Likely m with probability of p…
• In Healthcare IT, the Blackford Middleton $78 Billion advantage from transitioning US Healthcare from level 1 to 4
• NASA Technology Readiness Level topics; OMB topics
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 4
Project Proposal part 1
• 1. Background issues:– Estimated Project Time and Effort (SIMPLE, 2-3
people, 10 hrs over 2-5 weeks??)– Scope and Audience: Users and their audience
( Domain List including MBAs as well as the usual AI, Linguistics, Logic, Math, Ontology domains)
– Prior Efforts and Results (Google Search; Protégé Wiki, UM, Etc.)
– http://ps1.cim3.net/ps.php?theurl=http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webont-req-20040210/#purp290
– Current funded inititiatives ( IST Athena; IBM; SAP; Oracle, etc.)– http://www.sap.com/company/research/bpmsi/athena.epx
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 5
Project Proposal Part 2
• 2. Short Requirements Statement and Architectural Assumptions– Performance expectations (3-5 competency
questions)– Alignments with related projects and
Orchestration Mechanics of collaborative initiatives
– Use Case examplars from W3C Ontology Best Practices? (N-Aries?)
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 6
Project Proposal Part 3
• 3. Thesaurus "Product" Design– Selection criteria for Schema
• 1• 2
– Selection criteria for Schema Tools• 1• 2
– Acquisition of primary and secondary Tool Set
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 7
Project Proposal Part 4
• 4. Results– Ambiguity reductions– PoC (Proof of Concept) or FoC cycle– Demonstration of Competency cycle
• 5. Future Work and Contingencies– Workshop at Protégé 2006 Call for Participation– OASIS Interoperability Conference
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 8
Questions and Suggestions
• -• -• -
• =========================• Bob Smith [email protected]
– Professor Emeritus, Cal State University– School of Business, Management Department
• Business Strategy, Operations Research, Policy Audits, MIS-Expert Systems
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 9
Back up slides from Leo Obrst
• Ontology and Semantic Spectrum January 12, 2006– Slide 5: Tightness of Coupling and Semantic
Explicitness: Note the Green elements as time-lane context?
– Slide 9: One Spectrum View: Levels of Interoperability with costs and benefit pattern
– Slide 11: Triangle of Signs: Terms, Concepts, Pragmatic real world possibilities
– Slide 40: Thesaurus Starting point?– Slide 20: When is a Taxo Enough– Slide 21: Thesaurus Defined– Slide 25: When is a Thesaurus Enough?
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 10
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 11
Levels, Layers, Lacunae
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
HIEI Paper Container
HEI
Obrst
OMB-GAO
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 12
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 13
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 14
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 15
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 16
April 20, 2006 Sketch 1 17