34
OPEN LEARNING A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO THINKING ABOUT OPEN EDUCATION FREDRICK W. BAKER III WWW.FREDWBAKER.COM

Open Learning

  • Upload
    didina

  • View
    69

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Open Learning. A practical approach to thinking about open education Fredrick w. Baker iii www.fredwbaker.com. The path. Defining Openness Open Learning Elements of Open Learning Environments Types of Openness Open Educational Designs (course types) Conclusion. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Open Learning

OPEN LEARNINGA PRACTICAL APPROACH TO THINKING ABOUT OPEN EDUCATION

FREDRICK W. BAKER IIIWWW.FREDWBAKER.COM

Page 2: Open Learning

THE PATH• Defining Openness• Open Learning• Elements of Open

Learning Environments

• Types of Openness• Open Educational

Designs (course types)

• Conclusion

http

://liv

ehol

ines

s.co

m/w

p-co

nten

t/upl

oads

/201

2/02

/pa

th.jp

g

Page 3: Open Learning

OPENNESS

http://www.flickr.com/photos/opensourceway/6555466069/sizes/l/in/photostream/

Page 4: Open Learning

DEFINITION • No consistent definition of openness in

literature or thinking• Very context dependent • Many related areas with subtle

differences• Identifiable through characteristics

Page 5: Open Learning

NATURE OF OPENNESS• Continuous construct

• like a door- not on/off• Can be a little open, more open, or wide

open

Page 6: Open Learning

CHARACTERISTICS• General tenets

• Transparency• Reduction of Barriers• Universal Rights/Ownership

• Freedom of information• Access• Ability to Leave/Fork• SharingBaker III, & Surry, 2013

Page 7: Open Learning

OPEN LEARNING

http://www.ingeniosus.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Purchased-Man-in-Field-Freedom1.jpg

Page 8: Open Learning

OPEN LEARNING• Open Learning is:

• Digitally enabled-Web 2.0• Social Media/creative tools/PLEs/Blogs• Taking in/Digesting info/Sharing

• Self-directed• Learner directs his/her own path• Sets own goals, engages where

interested

Page 9: Open Learning

OPEN LEARNING• Not accredited-No real degrees

• Various assessment/certificates models

• Open Badges• Peer grading-essays• Different for different models

• Issues with authentication, cheating, plagiarism

Page 10: Open Learning

We cannot teach another person directly; we can only facilitate his

learning. ~Attributed to Carl Rogers 

Page 11: Open Learning

OPEN LEARNING• Participation in open learning is done for

the sake of learning• from internal, intrinsic motivation

• Some important elements are: • connections, • communities, • authentic practice, • networking

Page 12: Open Learning

ELEMENTS OF OPEN LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

http://www.uky.edu/Ag/Entomology/ythfacts/4h/unit1/grassho.gif

Page 13: Open Learning

OPEN LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS-ELEMENTS Webs of connection:• Traditional classes are one-to-many, • OLEs are one-to-many, many-to-many,

many-to-few. They are webs of connections.

Page 14: Open Learning

OPEN LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS-ELEMENTS There are three primary elements to all open learning environments:1. Environment2. Instructor3. Learners

Page 15: Open Learning

OLE ELEMENT 1• Environments

• Freedom rule (learner agency) • Environment rule (resources and

opportunity); • Individual Instruction rule (personalized,

toward worthwhile education goals); • Respect rule (respect for learners)

Tunnell, 1975

Page 16: Open Learning

OLE ELEMENT 2Connected Instructors

• Have active Personal Learning Environments (PLEs)**

• Connections (people, tools, resources, communities, etc.) enable better teaching

Couros, 2009, Drexler, 2010

Page 17: Open Learning

OLE ELEMENT 3Students are often Open Scholars.Open Scholars have PLEs:• Distributed online presence/identity (variety of

services)• Central place to share• Network of peers

Engage in new technologies and openness• Informal & open publishing outletsWeller, 2011

Page 18: Open Learning

OLE ELEMENT 3Students are not always open scholars!• Many are just everyday people

• Parents• Professionals and ameteurs• All ages• Various industries

Basic comfort level with technology is very helpful

Page 19: Open Learning

TYPES OF OPENNESS

http://www.corebankingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Differentiation.jpg

Page 20: Open Learning

TYPES OF OPENNESSThree schools of thought on openness• Procedural Openness• Normative Openness• Revolutionary Openness

Hill, B.V., 1975

Page 21: Open Learning

PROCEDURAL OPENNESS• Course designs reflect policy and design

decisions that enable structured openness• Changes in procedures/environment• Enhances educational goals through

enabling the tenets of openness• (Transparency, Reduction of Barriers,

Universal Rights/Ownership, Access, Ability to Leave/Fork, Sharing)

Baker III, & Surry, 2013, Hill, B.V., 1975, Klein & Eshel, 1980

Page 22: Open Learning

NORMATIVE OPENNESS• Learners should have full agency over

their own learning; • i.e. have total ownership over all

elements of all tasks and activities involved in education

• Instructors/designers have almost no say

• Probably best for autonomous/experienced learners

Baker III, & Surry, 2013, Hill, B.V., 1975, Klein & Eshel, 1980

Page 23: Open Learning

REVOLUTIONARY OPENNESS• Concerned with **disruptive change in

education;• i.e., New model so superior and

different that old must give way to new• Open Ed as innovative system to

supplant traditional education• Education structures can be culturally

bias, enforce oppression (Friere, 1970)

Baker III, & Surry, 2013, Hill, B.V., 1975, Klein & Eshel, 1980

Page 24: Open Learning

OPEN EDUCATIONAL DESIGNS

Page 25: Open Learning

OPEN EDUCATIONAL DESIGNS • OEDs: Overarching term referring to all

types of open learning environments• Traditional Education Models

• Procedural Openness• Topic Focus Models

• Normative Openness• Alternate Education Models

• Revolutionary Openness

Baker III, & Surry, 2013.

Page 26: Open Learning

OPEN EDUCATIONAL DESIGNS

Open K-12• Utah Open High

School

Open Home Schools

Anchored Open Courses(Higher Education courses)

• Wiley’s open courses

• Ed Startup 101• Openness in Education

• DS106-(Groom/Lavine)

• EC&I 831: Open Education & Social Media (Couros)

Baker III, & Surry, 2013.

Traditional Education Models (Procedural Openness):• Standard education models made open- some students registered

with/graded by a university

Page 27: Open Learning

OPEN EDUCATIONAL DESIGNS

Well Structured• Khan Academy• BonkOpen• MOOCMOOC

Ill StructuredcMOOCs (**Connectivist Massively Open Online Course)

• Change11• Oped12• CCK11

Baker III, & Surry, 2013.

Topic Focus Models (Normative Openness):• No schedule, free access to resources, full agency

Page 28: Open Learning

OPEN EDUCATIONAL DESIGNS

Peeragogy Models• Peer2Peer

University/Wikiversity

Open University Models

• MIT Open CourseWare (OCW)/ University of the People (UoPeople)/edX

Mass Delivery Models• Udacity• Coursera• xMOOCs (Institutional)

Baker III, & Surry, 2013.

Alternate Education Models (Revolutionary Openness):• Presented as alternative to traditional education models

Page 29: Open Learning

http://www.flickr.com/photos/50723930@N03/6164296462/sizes/l/in/photostream/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cogdog/6610909727/sizes/l/in/photostream/

Page 30: Open Learning

CONCLUSION• Openness is defined by characteristics

and context• Three elements to OLEs• Three types of Openness• Three categories of OEDs

Page 31: Open Learning

CONCLUSIONYou can find the slides, presentation audio set to slides (later), links, references (many

free to access), and resources at

www.fredwbaker.com

Under the “Resources” tab.

Page 32: Open Learning

THE PATH• Defining Openness• Open Learning• Elements of Open

Learning Environments

• Types of Openness• Open Educational

Designs (course types)

• Conclusion

http

://liv

ehol

ines

s.co

m/w

p-co

nten

t/upl

oads

/201

2/02

/pa

th.jp

g

Page 33: Open Learning

CONTACT ME

Fred Baker

www.fredwbaker.com

[email protected]

@fredwbaker

Page 34: Open Learning

REFERENCESBaker III, F.W., Surry, D.W. (2013). Open Educational Designs: A taxonomy for differentiating and classifying

open learning environments. Paper submitted for the Annual Conference of the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE). New Orleans, LA.

Couros, A. (2009). Open, connected, social-implications for educational design. Campus-Wide Information Systems 26 (3). Retrieved from http://www.icicte.org/ICICTE2008Proceedings/couros041.pdf

Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3). 369-385. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/drexler.pdf

Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

Hill, B.V. (1975). What’s open about open education? In Nyberg, D. (1975). The Philosophy of Open Education (pp.3-13). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd.

Klein, Z., Eshel, Y. (1980). The open classroom in a cross-cultural perspective: A research note. Sociology of Education, 53 (April) pp. 114-121.

Tunnell, D. (1975). Open Education: an expression in search of a definition. In Nyberg, D. (1975). The Philosophy of Open Education (pp.14-23). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd.

Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice. USA: Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved from http://www.bloomsburyacademic.com/view/

DigitalScholar_9781849666275/chapter-ba-9781849666275-chapter-009.xml