23

Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes
Page 2: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Open materials & methods

• Increases the ability to run replications

Page 3: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Open data and code

• Increases the ability to check for computational reproducibility

• Increases the ability to determine the robustness of the statistical inference

Page 4: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Open research workflow

Page 5: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

What is an open workflow?

• Research inputs and outputs are open:– Data, Code, Materials, Protocols, etc.

• The evolutions of these inputs and outputs over the research process– How and when versions of files changed

Page 6: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Open research workflow

• Increases ability to run replications

• Increases the ability to check computational & statistical reproducibility

• Increases the ability to detect researcher degrees of freedom

Page 7: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

What is required?

• Increase open sharing

• Increase documentation

• Incentives

Page 8: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes
Page 9: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Enabling Open Workflows

Open Science Frameworkhttps://osf.io

Page 10: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Project Overview Page

Page 11: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Versioning

Page 12: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Registering Your Work

Page 13: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Sharing Your Work

Page 14: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Incentivizing Open Practices

• Badges for open practices

Page 15: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices

Page 16: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices

Page 17: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Incentivizing Open Practices

• Badges for open practices

• Additional metrics

Page 18: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Accessing Statistics

Page 19: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Search and

discover

Develop idea

Design study

Acquire materials

Collect dataStore data

Analyze data

Interpret findings

Write report

Publish report

Page 20: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Questions?

[email protected]@cos.io

Page 21: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Reproducibility Projects

Page 22: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Many Labs Project

Page 23: Open materials & methods · 2017. 1. 19. · Retro. gambler's fallacy (Oppenheimer & Monin 2009 Gain vs loss framing (Tversky & Kahneman 1981 Sex diff. in implicit math attitudes

Crowdsourcing Science