76
Operant Conditioning

Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Operant Conditioning

Page 2: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Classical v. Operant Conditioning Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction,

spontaneous recovery, generalization, and discrimination. Classical conditioning uses reflexive behavior - behavior that

occurs as an automatic response to some stimulus that come before the behavior.

Ask: Is the behavior something the animal does NOT control? YES. Does the animal have a choice in how to behave? NO. - Classical conditioning.

Operant conditioning uses operant or voluntary behavior – voluntary behavior that is shaped by consequences that come after the behavior

Ask: Is the behavior something the animal can control? YES. Does the animal have a choice in how to behave? YES. - Operant Conditioning.

Page 3: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

What is Operant Conditioning?

Page 4: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Operant Conditioning

• Learning where frequency of a behavior depends on the consequence that follows that behavior

• The frequency will increase if the consequence is reinforcing to the subject.

• The frequency will decrease if the consequence is not reinforcing or punishing to the subject.

Page 5: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

The Law of Effect

Page 6: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Edward L. Thorndike ( 1874–1949)

Page 7: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Edward Thorndike (1874-1949)

• Author of the law of effect

• Behaviors with favorable consequences will occur more frequently.

• Behaviors with unfavorable consequences will occur less frequently.

• Created puzzle boxes for research on cats

Page 8: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Thorndike’s Puzzle Box• “Thorndike’s Puzzle Box” Video #8

from Worth’s Digital Media Archive for Psychology. (2 min)

Page 9: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Thorndike’s Puzzle Box

Page 10: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Early Operant Conditioning

• E. L. Thorndike (1898)

• Puzzle boxes and catsScratch at bars

Push at ceiling

Dig at floorSituation:stimuliinside ofpuzzle box

Howl

Etc.

Etc.

Press lever

First Trialin Box

Scratch at bars

Push at ceiling

Dig at floorSituation:stimuliinside ofpuzzle box

Howl

Etc.

Etc.

Press lever

After ManyTrials in Box

Page 11: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

B. F. Skinner (1904–1990)

Page 12: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

B.F. Skinner (1904-1990)• Believed that internal factors like thoughts,

emotions, and beliefs could not be used to explain behavior. Instead said that new behaviors were actively chosen by the organism

• Looked at “Operants” or active behaviors that are used on the environment to generate consequences

• Developed the fundamental principles and techniques of operant conditioning and devised ways to apply them in the real world

• Designed the Skinner Box, or operant chamber

Page 13: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

The Skinner Box

Page 14: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Skinner’s Air Crib:A room fit for a…Baby!

To read more on this invention: Click Here!

Page 15: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Reinforcement/Punishment

• Reinforcement - Any consequence that increases the likelihood of the behavior it follows– Reinforcement is ALWAYS GOOD!!!

• Punishment - Any consequence that decreases the likelihood of the behavior it follows

• The subject determines if a consequence is reinforcing or punishing

Page 16: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Types of Reinforcement:

- Always GOOD

Page 17: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Positive Reinforcement

• Strengthens a response by presenting a stimulus that you like after a response

• Anything that increases the likelihood of a behavior by following it with a desirable event or state

• The subject receives something they want (added)

• Will strengthen the behavior

Page 18: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Positive Reinforcement

Page 19: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Negative Reinforcement• Strengthens a response by reducing or removing an

aversive (disliked) stimulus • Anything that increases the likelihood of a behavior

by following it with the removal of an undesirable event or state

• Something the subject doesn’t like is removed (subtracted)

• Will strengthen the behavior• Neg. Rein. Allows you to either:

– Escape something you don’t like that is already present (Neg. Rein. By Escape)

– Avoid something before it occurs (Neg. Rein. By Avoidance)

Page 20: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Negative Reinforcement

Page 21: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Positive/Negative Reinforcement

BOTH ARE GOOD THINGS!!!

Page 22: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Punishment:Always BAD

Page 23: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Types of Punishment

• An undesirable event following a behavior

• Behavior ends a desirable event or state

• Its effect is opposite that of reinforcement – it decreases the frequency of behavior

Page 24: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Positive Punishment(Punishment by Application)

• Something is added to the environment you do NOT like.

• A verbal reprimand or something painful like a spanking (See examples on pg. 211)

Page 25: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Negative Punishment(Punishment by Removal)

• Something is taken away that you DO LIKE.

• Lose a privilege. (See examples on pg. 212)

Page 26: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,
Page 27: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

The Good Effects of Punishment

• Punishment can effectively control certain behaviors if…– It comes immediately after the undesired

behavior – It is consistent and not occasional

• Especially useful if teaching a child not to do a dangerous behavior

• Most still suggest reinforcing an incompatible behavior rather than using punishment

Page 28: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Bad Effects of Punishment

• Does not teach or promote alternative, acceptable behavior.

• Only tells what NOT to do while reinforcement tells what to do.

• Doesn’t prevent the undesirable behavior when away from the punisher in a “safe setting”

• Can lead to fear of the punisher, anxiety, and lower self-esteem

• Children who are punished physically may learn to use aggression as a means to solve problems.

Page 29: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Reinforcement vs. Punishment  

  Reinforcing/Desirable Stimulus

Aversive/UnDesirableStimulus

Stimulus is presented or added to animal’s environment…

 

Positive (+) Reinforcement

Add something you DO LIKE.Behavior Increases

  

 

Positive (+) Punishment

Add something you DO NOT LIKE.

Behavior Decreases

Stimulus is removed or taken away from animal’s environment…

 

Negative (-) Punishment

TAKES AWAY something you DO LIKE.

Behavior Decreases 

 

Negative (-) Reinforcement

TAKES AWAY something you DO NOT LIKE.

Behavior Increases  

Page 30: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

How is Neg. Reinforcement different from Punishment?

• Negative Reinforcement will always increase a behavior

• Punishment will always decrease a behavior• Negative Reinforcement is something YOU

DO to take away something bad.• Punishment is something DONE TO YOU

that is bad and makes you stop doing a behavior.

Page 31: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

How is Punishment & Reinforcement being used to treat severely autistic and/or violent children?

See CNN video clip from Anderson Cooper 360.

Do you think they should be using these conditioning methods on these kids?

Page 32: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Primary Versus Secondary

Reinforcement

Page 33: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Primary Reinforcement

• Something that is naturally satisfying

• Examples: food, warmth, water, etc.

• The item is reinforcing in and of itself

• If on a deserted island, these are what you’d want!

Page 34: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,
Page 35: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Conditioned/Secondary Reinforcement

• Something that a person has Learned to value or finds rewarding because it is paired or associated with a primary reinforcer

• Money is a good example. • So are grades and signs of respect &

approval.

Page 36: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,
Page 37: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Immediate Versus Delayed

Reinforcement

Page 38: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Immediate Reinforcers

• Immediate reinforcers – behaviors that immediately precedes the reinforcer becomes more likely to occur – (This true when training animals. Can’t

wait for a long time before reinforcing or the animal won’t know what behavior you are reinforcing)

Page 39: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Delayed Reinforcers

• Also called Delayed Gratification – forgoing a small immediate reinforcement for a greater reinforcement later.

• Humans do this with paychecks, grades. • When do we not do this? • Stay up late to watch TV when next day

we’re tired• Smoke for satisfaction now when later it

will kill us

Page 40: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Immediate/Delayed Reinforcement

• Immediate reinforcement is more effective than delayed reinforcement

• Ability to delay gratification predicts higher achievement

Page 41: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Discriminative Stimuli • An environmental stimulus that triggers you to

do a certain behavior that will have a consequence.

• In the presence of a specific environmental stimulus (discriminative stimuli) we emit a particular behavior (the operant) which is followed by a consequence (reinforcement or punishment)

• Example: A ringing phone is a discriminative stimulus that sets a particular response of picking it up and speaking in it

Page 42: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Extinction

• In operant conditioning, the loss of a conditioned behavior when consequences no longer follow it.

• The subject no longer responds since the reinforcement or punishment has stopped.

Page 43: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Thoughts from Skinner:• Skinner believed from the moment of birth, the environment shapes

and determines your behavior through reinforcing or punishing consequences.

• “A person does not act upon the world, the world acts upon him.” (Read Critical Thinking Box on pg. 214-215 for more)

• “B.F. Skinner Interview” (4 min) – Disucsses Schedules of Reinforcemtn & Free Will

– Video #9 from Worth’s Digital Media Archive for Psychology.

Page 44: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Parts of Operant Conditioning(See Chart on page 215)

Discriminative Stimulus

Operant Response Consequence Effect on Future Behavior

Specific environmental stimulus 

Gas gage on empty

Wallet on sidewalk

Voluntary behavior 

Fill car with gas

Give Wallet to Security

Event that will make the operant response more or less likely to reoccur Avoid running out of gas.

Get $50 Reward

If reinforcement = more likely to reoccur If punishment = less likely to reoccur

Page 45: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Some Reinforcement Procedures:

Shaping

Page 46: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Shaping

• Reinforcement of behaviors that are more and more similar to the one you want to occur

• Technique used to establish a new behavior

Page 47: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Shaping Principles• Skinner box - soundproof box with a bar that an animal

presses or pecks to release a food or water reward, and a device that records these responses.

• Shaping - procedure in which rewards, such as food, gradually guide an animal’s behavior toward a desired behavior.

• Successive approximations - shaping method in which you reward responses that are ever closer to the final desired behavior and ignore all other responses.

• Shaping nonverbal animals can show what they perceive. Train an animal to discriminate between classes of events or objects. – After being trained to discriminate between flowers, people, cars,

and chairs, a pigeon can usually identify in which of these categories a new pictured object belongs

Page 48: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Skinner attached some horizontal stripes to the wall which he then used to gauge the dog's responses of lifting its head higher and higher. Then, he simply set about shaping a jumping response by flashing the strobe (and simultaneously taking a picture), followed by giving a meat treat, each time the dog satisfied the criterion for reinforcement. The result of this process is shown below, as it was in LOOK magazine, in terms of the pictures taken at different points in the shaping process. Within 20 minutes, Skinner had Agnes "running up the wall"

Page 49: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

For the second shaping demonstration, Skinner trained Agnes to press the pedal and pop the top on the wastebasket. Again, the photographer's flash served as the conditioned reinforcer, and each step in the process was photographed. The results are shown below.

Page 50: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Schedules of Reinforcement

Page 51: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Continuous reinforcement

• A schedule of reinforcement in which a reward follows every correct response

• Learning occurs rapidly

• But the behavior will extinguish quickly once the reinforcement stops.– Once that reliable candy machine eats your

money twice in a row, you stop putting money into it.

Page 52: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Partial Reinforcement• A schedule of reinforcement in which a

reward follows only some correct responses

• Learning of behavior will take longer

• But will be more resistant to extinction

• Includes the following types:

– Fixed-interval and variable interval

– Fixed-ratio and variable-ratio

Page 53: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Fixed-Ratio Schedule• A partial reinforcement schedule that

rewards a response only after some set number of correct responses

• The faster the subject responds, the more reinforcements they will receive.

• i.e. piece work: You get $5 for every 10 widgets you make.

Page 54: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Variable-Ratio Schedule• A partial reinforcement schedule that rewards an

unpredictable average number of correct responses

• High rates of responding with little pause in order to increase chances of getting reinforcement

• This schedule is very resistant to extinction.• Vegas Rules! Sometimes called the “gambler’s

schedule”; similar to a slot machine or fishing

Page 55: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Fixed-Interval Schedule• A partial reinforcement schedule that rewards only the first

correct response after some set period of time• Produces gradual responses at first and increases as you get

closer to the time of reinforcement• “Procrastinator Schedule”• Example: a known weekly quiz in a class, checking

cookies after the 10 minute baking period.

Page 56: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Variable-Interval Schedule• A partial reinforcement that rewards the first correct

response after an unpredictable amount of time

• Produces slow and steady responses

• Example: “pop” quiz in a class

• “Are we there yet?” – ask all you want, doesn’t mean it speeds up when the reinforcement of arriving will happen

Page 57: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Ask Yourself…• Can the animal speed up its reinforcement by doing the

behavior? If YES - Ratio– Does the number of times the animal does the behavior vary

for reinforcement? Variable– Does the animal do the behavior a set number of times for

reinforcement? Fixed

• Is the example dealing with the amount of time that elapses from the behavior till it gets reinforcement? - Interval– Reinforcement will NOT be sped up by doing the behavior

more often– Does the amount time between the behavior and

reinforcement vary? Variable– Is the amount of time between the behavior and

reinforcement stay the same? Fixed

Page 58: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Schedules of Reinforcement

Page 59: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Operant Conditioning

Page 60: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Class Activity

• 4 Volunteers are needed to demonstrate schedules of reinforcement

• No punishment will be used.

• You will remain dry for the entire activity.

Page 61: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Variable Ratio• 1:1/ 7:1 / 4:1 / 12:1 / 8:1 / 19:1 / 3:1 / 2:1 / 2:1 / 5:1 / 16:1 /

11:1 / 3:1 / 8:1 / 4:1Fixed Ratio• 7:1 / 7:1 / 7:1 / 7:1 / 7:1,…. 15 timesFixed Interval• 10 sec:1 / 10 sec:1 / 10 sec:1 / ,… 15 timesVariable Interval• 6 sec:1 / 8 sec:1 / 10 sec:1 / 3 sec:1 / 7 sec:1 / 14 sec:1 / 15

sec:1 / 8 sec:1 / 5 sec:1 / 12 sec:1 / 6 sec:1 / 9 sec:1 / 13 sec:1/15 sec:1 / 8 sec:1

Page 62: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

New Understandings of Operant

Conditioning: The Role of Cognition

Page 63: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Skinner & Thorndike

• Believed that cognitions (thoughts), perceptions and expectations have no place in psychology.

• This is because they cannot be studied through observation and therefore were seen as not being objective.

Page 64: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Cognitive Aspects of Operant Conditioning

• Latent learning—learning that occurs in the absence of reinforcement, but is not demonstrated until a reinforcer is available

• Cognitive map—term for a mental representation of the layout of a familiar environment

• Learned helplessness—phenomenon where exposure to inescapable and uncontrollable aversive events produces passive behavior

Page 65: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Latent Learning

• Learning that takes place in absence of an apparent reward

• Idea developed by E.C. Tolman

Page 66: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

E.C. Tolman’s Rat Maze Experiment• Three groups of rats were trained to run a maze. • The control group, Group 1, was fed upon reaching the

goal. • The first experimental group, Group 2, was not rewarded

for the first six days of training, but found food in the goal on day seven and everyday thereafter.

• The second experimental group, Group 3, was not rewarded for the first two days, but found food in the goal on day three and everyday thereafter.

Page 67: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Tolman’s Rat Maze Experiment (continued)

• Both of the experimental groups demonstrated fewer errors when running the maze the day after the transition from no reward to reward conditions. The marked performance continued throughout the rest of the experiment.

• This suggested that the rats had learned during the initial trials of no reward and were able to use a "cognitive map" of the maze when the rewards were introduced.

• The initial learning that occurred during the no reward trials was what Tolman referred to as latent learning.

• He argued that humans engage in this type of learning everyday as we drive or walk the same route daily and learn the locations of various buildings and objects. Only when we need to find a building or object does learning become obvious.

Page 68: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Cognitive Map

• A mental representation of a place• Experiments showed rats could learn a maze without any

reinforcements• See a modern day example of Tollman’s experiment where t

hey change the maze on the rat (2 min)

Page 69: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Latent Learning & Cognitive Maps

• Play “Cognitive Processes in Learning” (6:25) Segment #12 from Psychology: The Human Experience.

Page 70: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Other evidence that we do think!

• Animals on a fixed-interval reinforcement schedule though respond more frequently as the time approaches for their reinforcer as if they expect that the response will produce the reward

Page 71: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Overjustification Effect• The effect of promising a reward for doing what

someone already likes to do• The reward may lessen and replace the person’s

original, natural motivation, so that the behavior stops if the reward is eliminated– The person may now see the reward, rather than intrinsic interest, as

the motivation for performing the task. – “If I have to be bribed into doing this, then it’s not worth doing for

its own sake.”

• Rewards do help increase interest when used to indicate a job well done

Page 72: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Learned Helplessness• Dogs in electrified cage at first not able to escape

the impending shock.

• Later, all they had to do was cross to the other side but they didn’t even try.

•The dogs had learned they were “helpless” to avoid the shock and just sat there and took it without trying to escape.

Page 73: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Learned Helplessness

• Exposure to inescapable and uncontrollable aversive events produces passive behavior. If an animal believes or expects it cannot escape a certain result, it will give up trying to do a behavior that could result in it escaping from the bad result.

• To overcome this, one must establish a sense of control over one’s environment and see some success.

Page 74: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

New Understandings of Operant

Conditioning:The Role of Biology

Page 75: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Biological Predispositions• Animal training issues –

easier to train behaviors that are closer to natural behaviors using a natural reinforcer (food).

•Instinctive drift—naturally occurring behaviors that interfere with operant responses.

•What happens when a trained tiger shows instinctive drift?

Page 76: Operant Conditioning. Classical v. Operant Conditioning  Both classical and operant conditioning use acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery,

Classical Conditioning vs. Operant Conditioning