19
OPERATIVE RIB FIXATION AFTER BLUNT TRAUMA: A PRACTICE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE FROM EAST George Kasotakis, MD MPH FACS Boston University School of Medicine An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management Guideline (PMG)

OPERATIVE RIB FIXATION AFTER BLUNT TRAUMA RIB FIXATION AFTER BLUNT TRAUMA: ... ORIF) • Study Eligibility – Prospective, cohort & case-control studies – Arms of rib ORIF vs non-op

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Committee

Team Member Affiliation and expertise George Kasotakis, MD MPH Boston University, Trauma Surgery & SCC Louis Alarcon, MD Univ. of Pittsburgh, Trauma Surgery & SCC Patrick Bosarge, MD Univ. of Alabama, Trauma Surgery & SCC John J. Como, MD MPH Metro Health Medical Center, Trauma Surgery & SCC Erik A. Hasenboehler, MD Johns Hopkins Medicine, Orthopedic Surgery Elliott R. Haut, MD PhD Johns Hopkins Medicine, Trauma Surgery & SCC Joseph Love, DO Univ. of Texas at Houston, Trauma Surgery & SCC Mayur Patel, MD MPH Vanderbilt University, Trauma Surgery & SCC Nimitt Patel, MD Metro Health Medical Center, Trauma Surgery & SCC Erik Streib, MD Indiana University, Trauma Surgery & SCC

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

EAH is a paid consultant for DePuy Synthes Trauma.

Background • Thoracic trauma significant source of morbidity &

mortality – Directly associated with 25% of trauma-related mortality

– Indirectly associated with another 50%

• Chest wall trauma typically accompanies internal thoracic injuries – Range of severity

• Rib fx ORIF relatively new option that addresses chest wall-related morbidity

• Patients that benefit the most, and the outcomes that are improved the most not well characterized

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Ranges from single, non-displaced rib fractures, without underlying pulmonary patholorgy, to complex fractures with severe displacement, significant chest wall deformity and underlying lung or other thoracic organ injury. With this project weaim to identify the pts that will benefit the most, and what outcomes are likely to improve the most with rib fixation.

Outcomes considered Outcome Mean Score Importance Mortality 8.8 Critical

Ventilator LOS 7.2 Critical

ICU LOS 6.5 Critical

Hospital LOS 6.5 Critical

Pneumonia 6.7 Critical

Tracheostomy requirement 6.9 Critical

Pain control 6.5 Critical

Lung volumes on spirometry 5.1 Important

Quality of life 5.7 Important

Exercise tolerance 4.4 Important

Chronic disability 5.6 Important

Time away from work 4.6 Important

PICO Questions • PICO #1

– In adult patients with flail chest after blunt trauma (P), should rib ORIF be performed (I) (vs non-op mgt) (C) to improve mortality; shorten DMV, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS; decrease incidence of pneumonia and need for tracheostomy; and pain control (O)?

• PICO #2 – In adult patients with non-flail rib fractures after blunt trauma

(P), should rib ORIF (I) be performed (vs non-op mgt) (C) to improve mortality; shorten DMV, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS; decrease incidence of pneumonia and need for tracheostomy; and pain control (O)?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
A number of outcomes clinically relevant to thoracic trauma were voted on (on a scale from 1-9) per the Grade methodology by the assembled committee and the critical ones (those that received an average score of >=7), were incorporated in our PICO questions. Patients were divided into flail chest & non-flail chest patients.

Methods

• Literature Review – PubMed, Embase, Cochrane

• Search Terms – (Rib fracture or flail chest) AND (surgical management/therapy/surgery

or fixation or plating or ORIF)

• Study Eligibility – Prospective, cohort & case-control studies

– Arms of rib ORIF vs non-op mgmt

– No language / year of publication restrictions

– Case reports, animal studies, reviews: excluded

Presenter
Presentation Notes
- Study was registered with Prospero & we followed the PRISMA methodology. MeSH and Key Words. Prospective &

Flow diagram of study selection Total Article Results: 1,164

PubMed: 573 Embase: 453

Cochrane: 138

Duplicates Removed: 166

Articles Screened: 998

Full-text articles assessed for eligibility: 25

Additional articles identified through full-text article citation

review: 3

Articles included in quantitative & qualitative synthesis: 22

Excluded: Studies not related to research question, not meeting

inclusion criteria: 973

Articles excluded for lacking outcomes or groups: 6

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Out of 983 identified studies, after removal of duplicates, 835 studies were screened through title & abstract review. 18 manuscripts were reviewed in full text, and 4 studies were removed for lacking groups or outcomes of interest, while an additional 2 were added through full text citation review.

ORIF improves mortality

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We have the forest plot of the meta-analysis for mortality. The horizontal axis represents the O.R. for the binary outcome from each study, with those to the left of this line favoring ORIF, and those to the right against it. The size of each box represents the contribution of each study to the final pooled treatment effect, with studies with larger sample sizes typically contributing the most. The whiskers from each box represent C.I. and this hollow box at the bottom the pooled O.R. for the main treatment effect and its C.I.

ORIF shortens DMV

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Forest plots demonstrates weighted mean differences for the LOS in days.

ORIF shortens ICU LOS

ORIF shortens hospital LOS

ORIF decreases incidence of pneumonia

ORIF decreases need for tracheostomy

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Not surprisingly, a process that decreases ventilator LOS, also decreases need for tracheostomy. A small publication bias was noted in studies that reported an effect on ventilation, ICU & hospital LOS, obviously favoring studies that demonstrated a positive effect.

PICO #2

• No studies included only non-flail chest pts

• 5 studies included both flail & non-flail pts: – Nirula (2006): ORIF decreased DMV in pts requiring MV

– deMoya (2011): ORIF improved pain control

– Khandelwahl (2011) - ORIF improved pain control & allowed earlier return to activity

– Wu (2015): ORIF shortened ICU, hosp LOS, DMV; decreased pneumonia, need for tracheostomy

– Majercic (2015): ORIF shortened ICU LOS (& DMV, trach in non-TBI pts)

– Pieracci (2016): ORIF decreased DMV & need for tracheostomy

• No subgroup analyses in any of the above

Presenter
Presentation Notes
No subgroup analyses performed in any

Recommendations

PICO#1 – Flail chest:

• In adult patients with flail chest after blunt trauma, we conditionally recommend rib ORIF to decrease mortality; shorten duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and hospital LOS; incidence of pneumonia and need for tracheostomy.

• We cannot offer a recommendation for pain control with currently available evidence.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
- (2) as soon as resuscitation is complete, other injuries have been addressed, and the logistics of planning such a procedure allow. - (5) as this was demonstrated in studies performed at least a decade ago, before recent advances in lung protective ventilation, judicious fluid administration and daily weaning trials were widespread.

Additional Considerations in flail chest

• Rib ORIF should be undertaken early to maximize benefit. • Less pronounced benefit on DMV/ICU LOS if mod-severe

pulmonary contusions, or in those with other indications for prolonged ventilation.

• Most studies excluded patients with mod-severe TBI pts. • Most authors recommend ORIF of ribs 3-10. • A survival benefit cannot be consistently anticipated

(mortality benefit in <2004 studies)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
- (2) as soon as resuscitation is complete, other injuries have been addressed, and the logistics of planning such a procedure allow. - (5) as this was demonstrated in studies performed at least a decade ago, before recent advances in lung protective ventilation, judicious fluid administration and daily weaning trials were widespread.

Recommendations

PICO#2:

• In adult patients with non-flail rib fractures after blunt trauma, we cannot offer a recommendation for any of the outcomes with currently available evidence.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Patients with severe pain despite maximal medical management, or those difficult to wean from pain killers

1st Author (year) Country Design Patient type Time to ORIF (d) ORIF # Non-op #

Kim (1981) France Retrospective Flail chest 18 142

Aubert (1981) France Retrospective Flail chest 18 144

Ahmed (1995) UAE Retrospective Flail chest 0.5-2 26 38

Karev (1997) Ukraine Retrospective Flail chest 1 40 93

Voggenreiter (1998) Germany Retrospective Flail chest 2 20 22

Tanaka (2001) Japan Prospective Randomized Flail chest 8.2 18 19

Balci (2004) Turkey Retrospective Flail chest 2 27 37

Granetzny (2005) Germany Prospective Randomized Flail chest 1.25 20 20

Nirula (2006) USA Case-control Any fracture 2.7 30 30

Teng (2009) China Retrospective Flail chest 2.5 32 28

Solberg (2009) USA Retrospective Flail chest 0.75 9 7

Khandelwahl (2011) India Prospective Any fracture 11 32 29

deMoya (2011) USA Case-control Any fracture 5 16 32

Althausen (2011) USA Case-control Flail chest 2.3 22 28

Marasco (2013) Australia Prospective Randomized Flail chest 4.6 23 23

Doben (2014) USA Retrospective Flail chest 3 10 11

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Busy slide, but studies for the utility of ORIF have been conducted worldwide. Only 3 prospective randomized studies were identified (…), Only 3 others identified patients with non-flail rib fx pattern. Significant variation in sample size.