Upload
mervin-booker
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Optimization of the Design of the Forward Calorimeters
ECFA LC WorkshopMontpellier, 15 November 2003
*FC Collaboration:
Colorado, Cracow, DESY(Zeuthen), JINR Dubna, London (UC), Minsk (BSU), Prague, Protvino (IHEP), Tel Aviv Collaboration
Agnieszka Kowal * University of Science and Technology, Cracow
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
2
Agenda
• Layout and functions of the forward calorimeters• Optimization of LAT design and angle
reconstruction algorithms• Stripped LAT design as an alternative• Laser alignment system for LAT• Performance of LCAL with real beam simulation
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
3
Forward Calorimeter Layout
• LAT– z = 305-325 cm– R= 8-28 cm – 26.2<<82 mrad– 0<<360 deg
• LCAL– z = 365-385 cm– R = 1.2-8 cm – 5<<28 mrad – 0<<360 deg
TDR design (postponed)
New mask design
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
4
Functions of the very forward calorimeters
• Measurement of luminosity (LAT)
• Fast beam diagnostics (LCAL)
• Detection of electrons and photons at very small angles
• Shielding of the tracking detectors
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
5
• Si/W calorimeters on both sides of the IP
• 8-128 concentric cylinders (in r)• 30 rings (in z)• 24/48 sectors (in )• Detector simulation with
Barbie–Geant3.21 (L.Suszycki)• Single 250 GeV electrons
LAT Design Simulation
beam pipe
Tungsten mask
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
6
LAT – reconstruction and resolution
24 sectors 48 sectors
Resolution as function of the number of cylinders
readout from odd rings onlyreduction of the # of channels
Angle reconstruction with simple energy weighting
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
7
LAT – reconstruction and resolution
48 sectors24 sectors
Resolution as function of the number of cylinders
resolution better for 48 sectors
Optimum LAT segmentation: 32 cylinders in R 48 sectors in 30 rings in z (readout from every 2nd)
23040 channels
artificial shift
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
8
LAT – performance with energy
E=40%√E
Ebeam = 62.32 * Edet + 0.36
0.2E-03
0.035
()
()
Energy Resolution & Calibration Angular Resolution vs Energy
R. Ingbir (TAU)
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
9
LAT – angle reconstruction methods
i
ii
E
EXX
i
ii
W
WXX
)]}ln([,0max{T
ii E
EconstW
Rec - Gen (rad) Rec - Gen(deg) Mean 0.2961E-03
Sigma 0.5809E-03
Mean –0.2361
Sigma 3.240
Mean 0.0975E-04
Sigma 0.2167E-03
Mean –0.7009
Sigma 1.917
i
ii
E
EXX
i
ii
W
WXX
)]}ln([,0max{T
ii E
EconstW
Rec - Gen (rad) Rec - Gen (rad) Rec - Gen(deg) Rec - Gen(deg) Mean 0.2961E-03
Sigma 0.5809E-03
Mean –0.2361
Sigma 3.240
Mean 0.0975E-04
Sigma 0.2167E-03
Mean –0.7009
Sigma 1.917
15 cylinders / 24sectors / 30 rings Bhabha scattering with BHWIDE
Simple weighting
Logarythmic weighting
R. Ingbir (TAU)250 GeV
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
10
LAT – design optimization
• # of active rings around the shower maximum
• logarythmic weighting in angle reconstruction
() ~ 70 rad feasible
resolution as function of the depth
# of cylinders
R. Ingbir (TAU)
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
11
LAT – Stripped design
• 30 tungsten rings• every second ring has either
120 radial or 64 concentric Si strips
• 2960 readout channels
B.Pawlik (INP-PAN, Cracow)
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
12
Stripped LAT reconstruction results
• Accuracy in measuring
is 0.5x10-4 rad• Energy measurement
with accuracy of
5 GeV (E~0.31√E)• low segmentation level
seems to be sufficient (~3000 read-out chan.)
B.Pawlik (INP-PAN, Cracow)
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
13
Laser measurement of the LAT detector displacement
reconstruction of He-Ne laser spot on CCD camera
Requirements on alignment:Inner Radius of LAT < 4 μmAxial LAT position < 60 μm
possible resolution of ~1m if the center of the light spot is determined with accuracy better than 0.1 pixel
J.Zachorowski (UJ),W.Wierba (INP-PAN) Cracow
work has just started
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
14
LCAL performance with Real Beam simulation
Included in the simulation:
ground motion, feedback system delay,
emittance growth,lumi optimisation
V.Drugakov (BSU, Minsk)
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
15
Real Beam vs. Ideal Beam LCAL particle recognition performance
• the identification efficiency of electrons close to the beam is nearly the same for RB and IB
• fake rate resulting from BG fluctuation is on the same level
100 GeV
V.Drugakov (BSU, Minsk)
Agnieszka Kowal ECFA 2003, Montpellier
16
Summary
• optimization of LAT structure and angle reconstruction algorithms is ongoing
(so far () ~ 70rad achieved)• room for improvement in angular reconstruction
algorithms (reduction of the bias in )• LAT sensor geometry (pad/strip) is still discussed • for the goal L/L precision a laser alignment
system is being developed for LAT• LCAL registration efficiency good for electrons
with energy above 100 GeV