or - leg.mn.gov · HPP lb ''32 12: 82F'M Mf'l COURT l:1F HFPEHLS STATI or KINNISOTA SPECIAL REDISTRICTING PA.NIL CS-91-985 Patricia Cotlow, Phillip Krass Sharon Lacomb, James Stein,

"

HPP lb ''32 12: 82F'M Mf'l COURT l:1F HFPEHLS

STATI or KINNISOTA

SPECIAL REDISTRICTING PA.NIL

CS-91-985

Patricia Cotlow, Phillip Krass Sharon Lacomb, James Stein, and Theodore Suss, individually and on behalf of all Citizens of Minnesota similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

and

John Walker, Howard Miller, Don Suder, and Nkajlo Vangh,

Plaintiff-Intervenors,

P.2

I I

I/

·.'-4..

vs. FINAL ORDER

Joan Grewe, Secretary of State of Minnesota; and Patrick H. O'Connor, Hennepin County Auditor, individually and on behalf of all Minnesota county chief election officers,

Defendants,

and

The Seventy-seventh Minnesota State House of Representatives and the Seventy-seventh Minnesota State senate,

Defendant-Intervenors.

I

BaeJcgrounst

~u~EW . . ~ 1f.1 .... 3 ~VI d i \ l J: .,. ~ ~

LEGrSLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY STATE CAPITOL I

STr. f Al.ii., MN,. ~l~ .

On June 4, 1991, the Minnesota Supreme Cqurt appointed the

unders~gned panel to haar and decide thi& state legislative and

This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp

HPF: 16 '·:;:._:: 1.::: 0.3Ff l r If I 1~(1UF'T 1:1F HFFEriL3 F ' • .J

congressional redistricting action on its merits. This charge has

been met with respect to state legislative redistricting. on

December 9, 1991, subject. to the federal court's injunction in

Emison y, Growe, No. 4-91-202 (D. Minn. Dec. 5, 1991), we issued a

final and appealable partial judgment on the state legislative

redistricting plan. Cotlow v. Growe, No. CS-91-985 (Minn •. sp.

Redistricting Panel, Dae. 9, 1991). After the United State.s

Supreme Court vacated the federal oourt•s injunction, cotlow y,

Emison, _ u.s. __ (Jan. 10, 1992) (No. 91-1084)., we formally

entered final judgment as to state legislative r.edistrictinq on '"'

January 31, 1992.

With respect.to congressional redistricting, this action h~~

not yet been· concluded on its merits. on Septe~ber 13, 1991, we

adopted final criteria ·for congressional plans and provided a

format for submission of plans in the event the l~qislature failed

to enact a constitutionally valid congressional apportionment plan.

From mid-September to early December 1991, the panel reserved

substantive consideration of alternative congressional plans until

legisiative and executive consideration was complete.

On December 5; 1991, the federal court issued its order

enjoining' the parties to this action from implementing or enforcin9

any state court redistricting order, ·specifically enjoining the

parties from participating in th~ state proceedings, and enjoining

this panel from going forward on a congressional redistricting

plan. Subject to the injunction, we ordered submission of proposed

plans by January 17, 1992. This later date was selected to allow

the leqislature full opportunity to enact conqressional

-2-

~l

Ht-I- lo :\.:. L.:.; ._i~r-1 I 1II1 ,_._iui- 1 ·• 1r r;t-t-t..1-iL=, r=. --l

redistrictinq legislation . and to spare the parties potential

conflict with tha federal panel's injunction.

Although the Minnesota Legislature, on January 9, 1992, passed

a congressional redistricting plan based on the 1990 federal

census, the governor properly exercised his veto and the plan did

not become law. Seg Minn. Const. art. IV, S 2 :3 (providing governor

with veto power and requiring two-thirds vote of each house to

override); Duxbury y. Donovan, 272 Minn. 424, 432-33, 138 N.W.2d

692, 698 ·(1965). When the special session ended without enactment

of . a congressional plan and the injunction was vacated by the '•"'

united States Supreme Cou~t, ~his panel scheduled and conducted a

procedural and mo~ion h~arinq on February 17, 1992, to review the

status of congressional redistricting and to resolve pendin9

motions.

As stated in our March 3 order, the federal pane1•s issuance

on February 19, 1992 of a ~ongressional redistrictinq plan and 'its

correspondinq

jurisprudential

injunction imposed

constraints· . on

additional le9al and

publishinq a state-court

congressional plan. For a nwnber of reasons, and particularly

because an appeal of the federal panel's jud9'lllent was filed

immediately with the United States Supreme court, dismissal o.f this

action was inappropriate.

On March 11, 1992, the supreme court granted a temporary and

limited stay of the Emison court's judgme~t affecting state

legislative redistrictinq. Growe y. Emison, No. A-671 (U.S. March

11, 1992). The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction on

March 30, 1992 without dissolving the stay. Pending a final

-3-

Iii

HPR 16 ''32 12: 0--lPM M~I COURT 1JF HPF'EHL'.3 P.S

decision on that appeal, this court's leqislative redistricting

plan will govern the 1992 elections.

Implementation o! the tederal panel's con9ressional

redistrictinq plan has not been similarly stayed. Pendinq review

by the United States supreme Court and pursuant to the federal

court's February 19 judgment, the federal panel's plan will control

Minnesota's 1992 congressional elections.

The . supreme court• s. notinq probable jurisdiction over the

complex jurisdictional questions that have evolved in this

redistricting process puts the ultimate effecti-~eness of the

federal panel's plan in question. Because the Supreme Court will

ultimately determine this issue and has designated which plans will

apply in the interim, publication of our congressional plan will

not create undue confusion or exacerbate any difficulties of

federal-state interaction.

For these reasons and to fulfill our charge of decidinq th~s

action on the merits .and to allow a complete record on review, we

adopt, subject to the district court's injunction and the Supreme

Court's order of March· 11, 1992, a .plan of congressional

redistrict~ng created by this court.

II

conq~essional 'lan

The population shifts of the past decade have created

population deviations in the 1982 congressional redistricting plan

that exceed 22% in district 3 and 34% in the districts• overall

ranqe, in violation of the U.S. and Minnesota Constitutions• strict

population standards. The plan we adopt eliminates these

unconstitutional ·defects. As with the proposed plans submitted to

-4-

~"

HPR 16 ''32 12: lJSPM M~l COURT OF HPPEHLS P.S

the court and that created by the federal panel, the plan contains

five districts of absolutely equal and "ideal" population. 1 The

three remaining districts each exceed the ideal distr~ct size by

only one person. The plan thus compli~s with Article 1., ·S 2 of

the United states Constitution mandating equal representation and

requiring districts to be apportioned aa nearly to equal as is

practicable. ~ Wesb1rry y. Sandars, 376 u.s. l, 7-S (1964). SJll.

A.lJi2 Min~. Const. art. IV, SS 2, J.

Some· communities and counties have to be divided to achieve

near-equal apportionment. our congressional plan substantially ·o..i...

minimizes the number of municipal and county splits while

praservinq the integrity of Minneapolis and St. Paul as distinct.

communities. Care was taken to avoid splitting any of the larqer

outstate cities between two districts. Our plan splits only 10

counties and 11 cities and townships for a total of twenty-one

splits, far fewer than the plans proposed by the defendant

intervenors (28 total) and plaintiff-intervenors (40) and the plan

created by the federal court (33),

To the extent possible, the plan se9regates urban, suburban,

and rural areas into discrete districts. Al thouq~ not

constitutionally compelled, the compactness of each district was

also considered in this panel's attempt to create the most

geographically and demographically consistent and convenient

districts possible. ruut Minn. Const. art. IV, S 3.

1 Dividing Minnesota's total census population by the number of its apportioned congressional seats, eight, yields an ideal district size of 546,987 people, with three people remaining •

... 5 ....

HPR lS '':32 12: Ot:Pf"1 Mr l 1:\:t1RT ff HF'PEHLS P.-;--

As the plainti!t-intervenors' plan illustrates, greater

compactness could have been achieved at tha expense of splitting

political.subdivisions. our plan balanced these two criteria, and,

without expressly endorsing one· approach to the exclus·ion of

others, we note that,. usi~9 the federal court 1 s formula adopted

from Polsby and Popper, Ib• Third Criterion: Compagtness as a.

Procedural Safeguard Against Gerrymandering, 9 Yale Law & Policy

Review 301 (1991), our plan achieves a hi9h•r co~pactness

percentage (.394) than either the 1982 plan (.3A7) or the current

federal court plan (.346). ·."'

The parties have neither challengea the 1982 conqressional

plan under the Voting Rights Act nor presented any evidence ot.

possible violation. By maintaining two primarily urban districts,

the plan adopted attempts, in compliance with the Act, to avoid any

unnecessary divisions of core minority populations.

Maps and population tables of the plan are attached as

Exhibits A - F. Should any discrepancies exist, the c~nsus_tract

descriptions, which are on file, shall be deemed controlling. To

insure compliance with this court's judgment 'detepnininq the

legislative redistricting plan of the State of Minnesota, and, if

necessary, to oversee implementation of the continqent plan of

congressional redistrictinq adopted by. this court, we retain

jurisdiction over this matter,

By separat'e order, ·we tax costs of approximately $28, 000

against Joan Growe, secretary of state of the state of Minnesota.

-6-

--,.,,,

_,_ .

/

'l>\tl\Ol~~•lP•~ tVUOJS••.:l&UOO ~UW •Al~•t•l.a.t

eqq. Jtq ·ft:\•Oo t't~o~ ·~ en. •••tts.

Sltl3ddtl .:JC'1 lcJn((1 IJl~ l·Jd9[1: .? T ::?f,. 9 T C:ldtl

fl;

HPR 16 '·~2 L:.: O";"H1 f'l~l Ci)IJRT 1)F

l(/tllMln ~

MlnNlll

~L.d99

Pall

1992 Congressional Districts State·Court Plan

'~, I

~ Norman I

CaM I

Sedrcr

\ ) ~ Altdrl

OttmrTllll I ?he

_,,

~

~

s..11\

Llncxm I Lyon I I I L·- 'r·(f~-r 1 1- 1

1

EXHIBIT A

.._,,) "'""' I _.......I •-~ ( •~""' I w-1 •- I °""' I o..- I ..,_

- -M - .... l ........ 1 • ...,,.,,1 ....... IAI-•

(/.)

s "' (t>

Q e i

~ I f { f f 1 f r

::t

' f

J •

{ J l '""d i ..........

~ J ~' "'' IC ,....

I t if ( f r i l i

' .f l l l

[ r J

J J N J

r

' I

1 f f . J

I i I f t i i J .J J J

.f

M f

r i f r I J J i °'

I

i J f I • r J~ ..

J J l

~I &iJ r l ~

l i i ,, l' I l

I • ~

J \0 f ts

Q 0 (T'Q

~ ~ 5· 0 ~

e . Vi r;:r 8 J:iIHIHX3 a·

OT 'd Sl~3dd~ jO l~noJ NW Wd80:2T 26. 9T' ~d

HF'R 16 "32 L:: 0'3PM M~I l))URT t)F HPPEHLS

R•port Namlli Pla.n Typ. Plan n~ Date Time User

\II;

POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SPLITS a CONGRESS s STPANEL18

April 03, 1992 10127 AA

1 9tpariel

EXHIBIT C

~----·---~----w---------~-~---------w---••----~--------~---~~-----~-Number of times a eubdiviaion is ;plit into more than one district:

countieSJ: MCD11: VTOs:

10.00 11.00 11.00

-~-------------~·----"----·-·----~-----~---~~---~----p---·----------CountiH Split:

County District ''-4..

Benton 007 Benton ooa Dakota 001 Dakota 003 Da.kota 004 Dakota 006 Hennepin 002 Hennepin 003 Hennepin 004 Hennepin 005 La Sueur 001 Le Sueur 002 Morrison 007 Mo.rrieon 008 Nicollet 001 Nicollet 002 Scott 001 Scott. 002 Scott 003 ·SherburnGa 007 Sherburn a 008 Stearns 002 Stearns 007 Wri9ht 002 Wright 003

---·-------------------~~---~------~-----~---~·----"---~~~------~--~ MCOs Split1

County MCD District . Ramsey Blaine city· 004 Anoka Blaine city 006 Stearn a Edan Lake township 002 stea.rns EdQn LakQ township 007 Hennep-in Edina city 003 HunnEtpin Edina city 005 Dakota InvQr Grove Hei9hte city 004 Dakota Inver Grove Height; city 006 Dakota Lakeville city 003

P. ll

I}

APR lb I '32 12: HJPM MN COURT tJF APPEAL'3 EXHIBIT C ( c p. 12 om::.l.nued)

Dakota u.kev i.l le city 006

't~ SU$Ur Lane1burgh township 001

LG Sueur Laneebur9h township 002

Morrison Motley city 007

Ca es• Motley city ooa ti.ShG?rburna Palrnar township 007

Sherburne Palmet' towneship ooa cakota Ravenna. township 001

Dakota Ravenna township 006

Ra.msay Sprin9 iake Park city 004

Anoka sprin9 Lake Pa~k city 006

Ramsey White Bear Lake oity 004

Washington White Bear Lake city 006

-----~---~---~----·---~----~---------~·---~--~~----~~---~·---~~----~ •i VTDe Split;

County MCD VTD District

Dakota. 31076 INVER GROVE.HGHTS.P-1. 004

Dakota 31076 INVER GROVE HOHTS.P•l 006

Dakota 31076 INVER GROVE HGHTS,P-5 004'-

Dakota 31076 INVER GROV!" HGHTS. p ... 5 006

oakota 35180 LAKEVILLE P•3 003

Dakota 35180 LAKEVILLE P-3 006

Dakota 53260 RAVENNA TWP. 001

Dakota 53260 RAVENNA TWP. 006

Hennepin 18188 EDINA P- 2 003

Hennepin 19198 EDINA P- 2 005

Hennepin 18188 EDINA P- 7 OOJ

Hennepin 18188 EDINA P.- 7 005

Hennepin 18188 EDINA P-16 003

Henna pin 18188 EDINA· P-16 005

Hennepin 18188 MCD+ EOINA P-19 003

Hennepin 54214 MCD+ EDINA P-18 005

Le sueuJ: 35468 LANESBURGH TWP, 001

Le Sueur 35468 LANESSURGH TWP, . 002

Sherburne 49534 PALMER TWP, 007

Sherburne 49534 PALMER TWP. 008

Stearns 18098 EDEN LAKE TWP. 002

Stearns 18098 EDEN LAKE TWP. 007

APR 16 '':32 12: 10PM MN COURT (1F APPEALS

'f'eport Na.ma Plan Type Plan na.me Date Time User

Diatrict

Oi9trict Populations 1 CONGRESS

STPANEL18 a Ma.r:ch :u, 1992

12104 PM stpan•l

Total Pop 1 Ab~ Dev \ Dav

EXHIBIT D

: Totalla+ Pop: ~~----·~--+~----·~------+--~----~~----t----------·--+~~---p-------001 546,887 : 0 I o.oo r 399,240 002 546,988 I 1 I o.oo : 390,146 003 546,888 I l . o.oo • 401,451 . 004 546,887 : 0 : o.oo I 412, 608 005 546,887 I 0 a o.oo I 435,052 006 546,887 I 0 . o.oo I 377,110 . 007 546,887 ' 0 j o.oo ' 395,116 008 546,888 t 1 g o.oo . 397,593 .

m:=s.nn;:san;;;: 111=::e1111111111••••==· Plan Total i 4,375,099 J,208,315 ."4..

/

Mean Deviation is 1 · 0 Mean Percent Deviation iaa o.oo

Largest Positive Oeviation is: l o.oo Percent Largest Negative Deviation is: 0 o.oo Pe.t'eent

Overall Ran<;;ie 1 l o.oo Percent

p' 13

HPR lG 1 92 12:11PM MN COURT OF APPEALS ~. 14

~•p<:>rt Nam• ' MINORITY REPORT ~ TOTAL POPULATION EXHIBIT E Plan Type a CONGI\ESS

Han name l S'l'PAN!LlS oat• a April 03, 1992 Time I 9208 AH U1uu• s · atpanel

~

I .

Dist I Black \ I Indian \ I Adan \ 1 Hispanic ' : Other ' :

--"~-+------~-----~-+--~-~~~-------+---------"~---+--------------+··-------~~---+ OOl 1,706 0\ l,329 0\ 6,363 1' 5,403 1' 123 0\ 002 776 0, 1,aes 0, 2 ,.7 99 l\ s, 222 1' 92 0, 003 9,605 2\ 1,868 011 ll, 454 2\ 4, 945 1' 351 0\ 004 .22, 482 4, 4,347 1' 24,810 5, l.S, 61.5 3\ 519 0\ 005 50,735 9\ 12,596 2, lS,924 3\ 9,654 2' 888 ·Olts 006 4 1 63S l\ 2,890 l\ 7, 279 l\ 5,928 1' 214 0\ 007 l, ,160 0\ 12,005 2\ 2,569 0\ 4,334 1' 127 0\ 008 1,938 0\ 11, 328 2111 ·2, 031 0\ 2,783 1' 115 0\

STAT!: TOTAL '"

93·, 040 2, 48,.251 1\ 76,229 .. :a 53,884 1' 2,429 0\

HF'R 16 '32 L::: l lFn M~~ ((11.JRT (1F HPPE8L'3

03/27/92 PACE l

Compactness by District atpanell8

...

DISTRICT POLSBY•POPPER INDEX -------- -~P---~ff----~----wP

001 0.523 002 0.416 003 0.283 004 0.566 005 o. 514 006 0.255 007 0.269 008 o. 3~6

EXHIBIT F

······•••****************~·-••**************************ft****** ··~

Average compactnese iB: 0.394 Total Perimetet in MILES i•s 3,933

***********************~***************************************

F'. 15

•1

.;• ~

Plan Type Plan name T')ate

CONGRESS STPANEL18 02/23/93 4:19 PM wytten

ime User Report District Census Units

f,.

DISTRICT 001 Blue Earth County Dakota County

Castle Rock township Douglas township Eureka township Greenvale township Hampton city Hampton township Miesville city New Trier city Northfield city Randolph city Randolph township Ravenna township

RAVENNA TWP. CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614

Sciota township Waterford township

Dodge County Faribault County Fillmore County Freeborn County Goodhue County Houston County Le Sueur County

Cleveland city Cleveland township Cordova township Elysian city

B 426 B 428 B 429 B 431 B 432 B 435 B 436 B 437 B 438 B 439 B 440 B 441 B 442 B 443

'"'

Precinct Total

City Total

county Total

54,044

1,480 670

1,405 685 363., 866 135

96 170 331 448

145 141 132

13 11, 60 10 32

144 0

13 6 0

18

725

725 252 485

8, 111 15,731 16,937 20,777 33,060 40,690 18,497

699 559 533 443

02/23/1993 PAGE 2

District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANEL18

CONGRESS District 001 (continued)

,,, Elysian township . 860

Kasota city 655

Kasota township 1,303

Kilkenny city 167

Kilkenny township 444

Lanesburgh township LANESBURGH TWP.

CT 9501 B 218 28

CT 9501 B 219 102

CT 9501 B 220 21

CT 9501 B 221 17,

CT 9501 B 222 18

CT 9501 B ~23 54

CT 9501 B 224 12

CT 9501 B 225 43

CT 9501 B 226 '"4.. 17

CT 9501 B 227 17

CT 9501 B 2J2 / 21

CT 9501 B 233 82

CT 9591 B 234 0

CT 9501 B 235 7

CT 9501 B 236 0

CT 9501 B 237 0

CT 9501 B 238 o· CT 9501 B 239 6

CT 9501 B 240 3

CT 9501 B 241 21

CT 9501 B 242 0

CT 9501 B 243 4

CT 9501 B 244 2

CT 9503 B lOlB 19

CT 9503 B 401A 0

----------Precinct Total 494

----------City Total 494

Le Center city 2,006

Lexington township 745

Montgomery city 2,399

Montgomery township 627

Sharon township 559

Washington township 652

Waterville city 1, 771

Waterville township 619

----------County Total 15' 53 5

Mower County 37,385

Nicollet County Belgrade township 1, 456

Mankato city 9

02/23/1993



I\; North Mankato city

Olmsted Rice Scott

Elko city

County county County

New Market city New Market township

Steele Wabasha Waseca Winona

DISTRICT 002 Big Stone Brown Carver Chippewa Cottonwood Hennepin Jackson Kandiyohi

County County County County

Coun~y

County County County County County County County

Lac qui Parle County Le Sueur County

Derrynane township Heidelberg city Lanesburgh township

LANESBURGH TWP. CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9S·Ol CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501

B 101 B 102 B 103 B 104B B 104C B 201 B 202 B 203 B 204 B 205 B 206B B 208B B 211B B 212 B 213B B 214 B 215 B 216

county Total

County Total

District Total

PAGE

·-....

3

10', 164

11,629· 106·,470

49,183

223 227

2,008

2, 45Ef 30, 729 19,744 18,079 47,828

546,887

6,285 26,984 47,915 13,228 12,694

0 p,677 38,761 8,924

600 73

113 20 :i 1 38

0 37 35

333 40 14

3 0

121 21 59 27 23 36

02/23/1993



"' CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9501 CT 9503 CT 9503

Le Sueur city New Prague city Ottawa township Tyrone township

Lincoln County Lyon County McLeod County Martin. County Meeker· County Murray County Nicollet County

Bernadotte township Brighton township Courtland city Courtland township Granby township Lafayette city Lafayette township Lake Prairie township New Sweden township Nicollet city Nicollet township

· Oshawa township Ridgely township St. Peter city Traverse township West Newton township

Nobles County

B 217 8 228 8 229 B 230 8 231 8 3018 8 316C 8 3178 8 3188 8 320C 8 3218 8 348 8 349 8 102A 8 103A

Precinct Total

City Total

County Total

County Total

PAGE 4

3 28 28' 15

2 13 11

8 16 22 20 'I

18 0 4 0 __ .'"tot:' _____ _

1, 119

1, 119 3,714 1,213

323 662

7,704 6,890

24,789 32,030 22,914 20,846 9,660

334 183 412. 710. 296 462 747 691 356 795 563

:471 139

9, 42.1 338 529

16,447 20,098

02/23/1993



Pipestone County Redwood County Renville County Rock County Scott County

Belle Plaine city Belle Plaine township Blakeley township Cedar Lake township Credit River township Helena township Jackson township Jordan city Louisville township New Prague city Prior Lake city St~ Lawrence township Sand Creek township Shakopee city spring Lake township

Sibley Stearns

Eden Lake EDEN

County County

township LAKE TWP. CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111

Eden Valley city Paynesville city Paynesville township

Swift County Watonwan County Wright county

Albertville city Albion township Annandale city Buffalo city Buffalo township Chatham township Clearwater city Clearwater township Cokato city

B 711 B 712 B 713 B 718

/

county Total

Precinct Total

City Total

County Total

PAGE 5

10,491 17,254, 17,673' 9,806

3,149 691 456

1,688 2,854., 1,107 1,359 2,909

910 2,356

''-1..11,482 418.

1, 511 11, 739 2,853

45,482 14,366

5 39 15

8

67

67 315.

2,275 1,307

3,964 10' 724 11, 682

1,251 1;121 2,054 6,856 2,086

858 597

l,1156 2,180

02/23/1993



fli, Cokato township Corinna township Delano city Frankfort township Franklin township French Lake township Howard Lake city Maple Lake city Maple Lake township Marysville township Middleville township Monticello city Monticello township Montrose city Otsego township Rockford township St. Michael city Silver Creek township South Haven city Southside township Stockholm township Victor township Waverly city Woodland township

Yellow Medicine County

DISTRICT 003 Dakota County

Burnsville city Lakeville city

LAKEVILLE P-3 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808

B 101 B 102 B 103 B 104 B 105 B 106 B 107 B 108 B 109 B 110 B 111 B 112 B· 113 B 114 B 115 B 116

County Total

District Total

PAGE 6

1,100 2,053. 2,709 2,935 2,742

945 1,343 1,394 1,829 1, 839 'I

1,017 4,941 3,981 1,008

. 5,219 "' 3,380

2,506 1,835

193 1,241

773 1,083

600 1,091

65,916 11,684

546,888

51,288

8-9 14 85

0 0 8

37 133

9 21 35

7 58

8 26

180

02/23/1993



CT 060808 ... CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808

1 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808 CT 060808

Hennepin county Bloomington city Brooklyn Center city Brooklyn Park city Champlin city Corcoran city Dayton city Deephaven city Eden Prairie city Edina city

EDI.NA P- 1 EDINA P- 2 EDINA P- 5 EDINA P- 6

B 117 B 118 B 119 B 120 B 121 B 122 B 123 B 126 B 127 B 128 B 129 B 130 B 131 B 132

_B 133 B 134 B 135 B 136 B 137 B 138 B 139 B 140 B 202 B 203 B 204 B 205 B 206 B 207 B 208 B 209

Precinct Total

City Total

County Total

PAGE

''-I..

7

' 12 89

260 57 44 31 19

463 17 15 28· 1

50 54 28 14 19 29 16 40

2 53

2 261

5 80

3 74 21

103 35

2,634

2,634

53,922

86,335 28,887 56,381 1.6, 849

5,199 4,392 3,653

39,311

1,628 23

2,602 2,490

02/23/1993 PAGE 8



~. EDINA P- 7

CT 0237 B 213 12

CT 0237 B 214 33

CT 0237 B 215 108

CT 0237 B 216 31

CT 0237 B 217 38

CT 0237 B 218 41

CT 0237 B 219 50

CT 0237 B 220 36

CT 0237 B 301 26

CT 0237 B 302 38

CT 0237 B 303 26

CT 0237 B 304 22

CT 0237 B 305 9.6

CT 0237 B 306 85

CT 0237 B 307 '-4.. 16

CT 0237 B 308 50

CT 0237 B 309 18

CT 0237 B 334 79


EDINA P-10 2,250

EDINA P-11 2,844

EOINA P-12 1,964

EDINA P-13 2,854

MCD+ EDINA P-15 2,986

EDINA P-16 CT 024001 B 106 0

CT 024001 B 107 35

CT 024001 B 108 0

CT 024001 B 109 0

CT 024001 B 110 172

CT 024001 B 111 0

CT 024001 B 112 0

CT 024001 B 113 36

CT 024001 B 114 58

CT 024001 B 115 78

CT 024001 B 116 49

CT 024001 B 117 32

CT 024001 B 118 80

CT 0.24001 B 120 0

CT 024001 B 201 32

CT 024001 B .202 14

CT 024001 B 203 30

CT 024001 B 204 15

CT 024001 B 205 24

.CT 024001 B 209 0

CT 024001 B 220 67

CT 024001 B 221 21

CT 024001 B 222 35

CT 024001 B 226 171

02/23/1993



fii CT 024001 CT 024002

EDINA P-17 . MCD+ EDINA P-18

EDINA P-19 EDINA P-20

Excelsior city Greenfield city Greenwood city Hanover city Hassan township Hopkins city Independence city Long Lake city Loretto city Maple Grove city Maple Plain city Medicine Lake city Medina city Minnetonka city Minnetonka Beach city Minnetrista city Mound city Orono city Osseo city Plymouth city Rockford city Rogers city St. Bonifacius city Shorewood city Spring Park city Tonka Bay city Wayzata city Woodland city

Scott Wright

County County

Dayton city Hanover city Rockford city

B 229 B 103

Precinct Total

City Tqtal

/

. County Total

County Total

District Total

PAGE 9

118 0

1,067 1,337 1,705 2,774

839

28,168 2,367'' 1,450

614 269

1,951 ""'4.. 16, 534

2,822 1,984

404 38,736

2,005 385

3,096 48,370

573 _3 I 439 9,634 7,285 2,704

50,889 440 698

1,180 5,917 1,571• 1, 472 3,?06

496

480,266 9,906

51 518

2,225

2,794

546,888

02/23/1993


DISTRICT 004 Dakota County

~ Inver Grove Heights cit INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-1

CT 060501 B 501 CT 060501 B 502 CT 060501 B 503 CT 060501 B 504 CT 060501 B 505 CT 060501 B 506 CT 060501 B 507 CT 060501 B 508

INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-5 CT 060502 B 302B CT 060502 B 315 CT 060502 B 316 CT 060502 B 317 CT 060502 B 318 CT 060502 B 319 CT 060502 ·B 320 CT 060502 B 417 CT 060502 B 418 CT 060502 B 419 CT 060502 B 426

INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-6

Lilydale city Mendota city Mendota Heights city South St. Paul city Sunfish ~ake city West St. Paul city

Hennepin Ramsey

DISTRICT 005

County County

Hennepin County Crystal city Edina city

EDINA P- 2 CT 023501 CT 023501 CT 023501 CT 023501

B 101 B' 102 B 103 B 104

Precinct Total

/

Precinct Total

city Total

County Total

District Total

PAGE 10

121. 39 33 63

470 95

178 o,I·

999

456 15.

.'-1..

225 42

110 36

135 38 50 24 36

~1, 167 3, 719

5,885 506 164

9,431 20,197

413 19,248

55,844 5,278

485,765

546,887

23,788

25 44 22

8

02/23/1993 PAGE 11



CT 023501 B 105 25

CT 023501 B 106 7 I

CT 023501 B 107 27'

CT 023501 B 108 10

CT 023501 B 109 0

CT 023501 B 110 5

CT 023501 B 111 10

CT 023501 B 112 1

CT 023501 B 113 36

CT 023501 B 114 38.,

CT 023501 B 115 so CT 023501 B 116 64

CT 023501 B 117 53

CT 023501 B 118 55

CT 023501 B 119 42

CT 023501 B 120 ~ 34

CT 023501 B 121 /

76

CT 023501 B 122 25

CT 023501 B 123 222

CT 023501 B 124 356

CT 023501 B 125 0

CT 023501 B 126 0

CT 023501 B 201- 310

CT 023501. B 202 34

CT 023501 B 203 0

CT 023501 B 204 64

CT 023501 B 205 66

CT 023501 B 206 57

CT 023501 B 207 37

CT 023501 B 208 45

CT 023501 B 209 0

CT 023501 B 224 so CT 0237 B 101 0

CT 0237 B 102 0

CT 0237 B 103A 0

----------Precinct Total 1,898

EDINA P- 3 2,635

EDINA P- 4 2,498

EDINA P- 7 CT 0237 B 1038 · 0

CT 0237 B 104 71

CT 0237 B 105 0

CT 0237 B 106 44

CT 0237 B 107 15

CT 0237 B 108 26

CT 0237 B 109 90

CT 0237 B 110 30

CT 0237 8 111 54

CT 0237 B 112 63

CT 0237 B 113 107

02/23/1993 PAGE 12



f.. CT 0237 B 115 36

CT 0237 B 118 65.

CT 0237 B 121 30'

CT. 023 7 B 122 38

CT 0237 B 125 41

CT 0237 B 126 40

CT 0237 B 132 57

CT 0237 B 133 55

CT 0237 B 134 49

CT 0237 B 137 12 .,

CT 0237 B 138 41

CT 0237 B 139 36

CT 0237 B 201 25

CT 0237 B 202 28

CT 0237 B 203 26

CT 0237 B 204 "'4.. 56

CT 0237 B 205 33

CT 0237 B 206 / 32

CT 0237 B 207 39

CT 0237 B 208 52

CT 0237 B 209 25

CT 0237 B 210 33

CT 0237 B 211 35

CT 0237 B 212 0

CT 0237 B 223 20

CT 0237 B 224 42

CT 0237 B 322 19

CT 0237 B 323 14


EDINA P- 8 2,666

EDINA P- 9 2,431

EDINA P-14 2,654

EDINA P-16 CT 024001 B 101 422

CT 024001 B 102 138

CT 024001 B 103 528

CT 044001 B 104 0

CT 024001 B 105 0

CT 024001 B 122 553

CT 024001 B 123 0


----------city Total 17,902

Fort Snelling unorg. 97

Golden Valley city 20' 971

Minneapolis city 368,383

New Hope city 21,853

Richfield city 35' 710

Robbinsdale city 14,396

02/23/1993



" St. Louis Park city

DISTRICT 006 Anoka county Dakota county

Apple Valley city Coates city Eagan city Empire township Farmington city Hastings city Inver Grove Heights cit

INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-1 CT 060501 B 509 CT 060501 B 510 CT 060501 B 601 CT 060S01 B 602 CT 060501 B 603 CT 060501 B 604 CT 060501 B 605 CT 060501 B 606A CT 060501 B 701 CT 060501 B 702 CT 060501 B 703 CT 060501 B 705 CT 060501 B 801 CT 060501 B 802 CT 060501 B 803 CT 060501 B 804 CT 060501 B 805 CT 060501 B 806 CT 060501 B 807 CT 060501 B 808 CT 060501 B 809 CT 060501 B 810 CT 060501 B 811 CT 060501 B 812 CT 060501 B 813 CT 060501 B 814

INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-2 INVER 'GROVE HGHTS.P-3 INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-4 INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-5

CT 060502 B 101 CT 060502 B 102

County Total

District Total

Precinct Total

PAGE 13

43;787

546,887.

546,887

243,641

34,598 186 11

47,409 1,340 5,940

15,440 '"&..

267 27

541 25 39

6 17 72

157 39 26

4 470

71 551

50 20 35 Bi

121 109

27 322·

91 59

0

3,228 3,015 2,127 3,923

0 13

02/23/1993 PAGE 14



1" CT 060502 B 103 'i 3

CT 060502 B 104 8

CT 060502 B 105 21

CT 060502 B 106 25

CT 060502 B 107 7

CT 060502 B 108 0

CT 060502 B 109 0

CT 060502 B 201 19

CT 060502 B 202A 119

CT 060502 B 203 . 71

CT 060.502 B 204 21

CT 060502 B 208 49

CT 060502 B 209 60

CT 060502 B 211 60

CT 060502 B 212 67

CT 060502 B 213 ''-4... 57

CT 060502 B 214 37

CT 060502 B 301 22

CT 060502 B 302A 220

CT 060502 B 302C 12

CT 060502 B 302D 5

CT 060502 B 303 63

CT 060502 B 304 65

CT 060502 B 305 97

CT 060502 B 306 37

CT 060502 B 307' 48

CT 060502 B 415 56

CT 060502 B 416 164

CT 060502 B 420 55

CT 060502 B 421 31

CT 060502 B 422 48

CT 060502 B 423 43

CT 060502 B 424 40

CT 060502 B 425 40

CT 060502 B 501 o· CT 060502 B 502 0

CT 060502 B 503 59

CT 060502 B 504 22

CT 060502 B 505 28

CT 060502 B 506 27

CT 060502 B 507 2

CT 060502 B 508 51

CT 060502 B 509 35 ______ ..... ___ Precinct Total 1,907

INVER GROVE HGHTS.P-7 2, 39.2

----------city Total ·16,592

Lakeville city LAKEVILLE P-1 4,586

LAKEVILLE P-2 1,733

02/23/1993 PAGE 15



flJ LAKEVILLE P-3 CT 060808 B 124 5 I

. CT 060808 B 125 17 .

CT 060808 B 201 581

CT 060808 B 210 4

CT 060808 B 211 1,774

CT 060808 B 212 0

CT 060808 B 213 20

CT 060808 B 214 33

CT 060808 B 215 39.,.

CT 060808 B 216 0

CT 060808 B 217 7

CT 060808 B 218 934

CT 060808 B 219 141

CT 060808 B 220 115

CT 060808 B 221 ."-\..

82

CT 060808 B 222 96

CT 060808 B 223 / 91

CT 060808 B 224 180

CT 060$08 ·B 225 118

CT 060808 B 226 72

CT 060808 B 227 138

CT 060808 B 228 59

CT 06080~ B 229 102

CT 060808 B 230 0

CT 060808 B 231 470

CT 060808 B 232 27

CT 060808 B 235 71

----------Precinct Total S,176

LAKEVILLE P-4 4, 726

LAKEVILLE P-5 S,999

----------City Total 22,220

Marshan township 1,286.

Nininger.township 805

Ravenna township RAVEN~A TWP.

CT 0614 B 401 0

CT 0614 B 402 0

CT 0614 B 403 0

CT 0614 B 404 0

CT 0614 B 405 0

CT 0614 B 406 109

CT 0614 B 407 16

CT 0614 B 408 38

CT 0614 B 409 0

CT 0614 B 410 75

CT 0614 B 411 ,7

CT 0614 B 412 290

CT 0614 B 413 0

02/23/1993

District Census Units for CONGRESS Plan STPANE~l8

CONGRESS District 006 {continued)

II. CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614 CT 0614

Rosemount city Vermillion city Vermillion township

Washington County

DISTRICT 007 Becker County Beltrami County Benton County

Graham township Langola township Mayhew Lake township Minden township Rice city St. Cloud city Sartell city Sauk Rapids city Sauk Rapids township Watab township

B 414 B 415 B 416 B 417 B 418 B 419 B 420 B 421 B 422 B 423 B 424 B 425 B 427 B 430 B 433 B 434 B 444 B 445 B 446 B 447 B 448 B 449

Precinct Total

City Total

County Total

District Total

county Total

PAGE

."'

16

0 150

12 25 23 48

0 66 38

215 0

11 0

46 5 0 6

21 0 0 0 0

1,201

_1,201 8,622

510 1,201

157,350 145,896

' 546, 887

27,881 .34,384

549 795 751

1,900 610

5,950 1,844 7,825

850 2,394

23,468

02/2J/1993



CJ.ay Clearwater Douglas Grant. Hubbard Kittson Lake of the Wood Mahnomen Marshall Morrison

County County County County County County County County County County

Bowlus city Culdrum township Cushing township Darling township Elmdale city Elmdale township Flensburg city Green Prairie township Motley city Motley township Parker township Pike Creek township Rail Prairie township Randall city · Rosing township Scandia Valley township. Sobieski city Swan River township Swanville city Swanville township Two Rivers township Upsala city

Norman County Otter Tail County Pennington County Polk County Pope County Red Lake County Roseau County Sherburne County

Haven township Palmer township

PALMER TWP. CT 0303 CT 0303 CT 0303 CT 0303 CT 0303 CT 0303

B 201 B 202 B 203 B 204 B 2108 B 301

County Total

PAGE

."'

17

50;422 8,309

28,674. 6,246

14,939 S,767 4,076 S,044

10,993

260' 487 502 597 130 847 213 672 441 179 453 937 127 571 105 822 199 759 324 504 576 371

10,076 7,975

50' 71.4 f3, 306 32,498 10,745

4,525 15' 026

1,921

0 0 0

15 6

25

02/23/1993 PAGE 18



.. CT 0303 B 302 39

CT 0303 B 303 47

CT 0303 B 304 13

CT 0303 B 305 0

CT 0303 B 306 0

CT 0303 B 307 14

CT 0303 B 308 13

CT 0303 B 309 24

CT 0303 B 310 38

CT 0303 B 311 47

CT 0303 B 312 0

CT 0303 B 313 17

CT 0303 B 314 30

CT 0303 B 322 31

CT 0303 B 323 21

CT 0303 8 401 ." 12

CT 0303 8 402 13

CT 0303 B 403 / 71

CT 0303 B 404 .9

CT 0303 8 406 8

CT 0303 B 407 57

CT 0303 B 408 27

CT 0303 B 409 4

CT 0303 B 410 0

CT 0303 B 411 48

CT 0303 B 412 0

CT 0303 B 413 0

CT 0303 8 414 11

CT 0303 B 415 0

CT 0303 B 416 15

CT 0303 B 417 0

CT 0303 B 418 0

CT 0303 B 502 17

CT 0303 B 503 23

CT 0303 B 504 0

CT 0303 B 5058 0

CT 0303 B 5068 0

CT 0303 B 510C 0


----------City Total 695

st. Cloud city 5,246

----------County Total 7,862

Stearns County Albany city 1,548

Albany township 918

Ashley township 273

Avon city 970

Avon township 3,385

02/23/1993 PAGE 19



Iii Belgrade city \700

Brockway township 2,261

Brooten city 589

Cold Spring city 2,459

Collegeville township 1,624

Crow Lake township 390

Crow River township 387

Eden Lake township EDEN LAKE TWP.

CT 0111 B 101 66

CT 0111 B 102 34· 1

CT 0111 B 103 13

CT 0111 B 104 7

CT 0111 B 105 27

CT 0111 B 106 2

CT 0111 B 107 '" 0

CT 0111 B 108 38

CT 0111 B 109 / 28

CT 0111 B 201A 23

CT 0111 B 202A 7

CT 0111 B 203A 0

CT 0111 B 204A 0

CT 0111 B 205A 0

CT 0111 B 206 62

CT 0111 B 207 37

CT 0111 B 208 0

CT 0111 B 209 0

CT 0111 B 210 97

CT 0111 B 211 7

CT 0111 B 212 5

CT 0111 B 213 0

CT 0111 B 214 0

CT 0111 B 215 0

CT 0111 B 216 25

CT 0111 B 217 15·

CT 0111 B 218 32

CT 0111 B 219 8

CT 0111 B 220 15

CT 0111 B 221 2

CT 0111 B 222 0

CT 0111 B 223 0

CT 0111 B 224 1

CT 0111 B 225 0

CT 0111 B 226 25

CT 0111 B 227 0

CT 0111 . B 228 49

CT 0111 B 229 44

CT 0111 B 230 0

CT 0111 B 231 25

CT 0111 B 232 21

CT 0111 B 233 0

02/23/1993



... CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111 CT 0111

Elrosa city Fair Haven township Farming township Freeport city Getty township Greenwald city Grove township Holding township Holdingford city Kimball Prairie city Krain township · ·Lake George township Lake Henry city

B 234 B 235 B 236 B 237 B 238 B 239 B 240 B 336A B 435A B 701 B 702 B 703 B 704 8 705 8 706 8 707 8 708 B 709 B 710 .8 714 B 715 B 7168 B 717 B 7198 B 720 B 721 B 722 B 723 B 724 B 725 B 7268 B 7308 B 730C B 7300

Precinct Total

City Total

PAGE

......

20

50 27

€).

5 0 0

22 1

28 10

5 'I

21 62 43

0 23 . 18 17 12

0 2

30 0

26 7 0 0 8

16 0 0 0

·o 9

1,163

1;163 205

1,129 777 556 420 209 629

1,160 561 690 889 388

90

02/23/1993



fu Lake Henry township Le Sauk township Luxemburg township Lynden township Maine Prairie township Meire Grove city Melrose city Melrose township Millwood township Munson township New Munich city North Fork township Oak township Pleasant Lake city Raymond township Richmond city Rockville city Rockville township Roscoe city St. Anthony city St. Augusta township St. Cloud city St. Cloud to~nship St. Joseph city St. Joseph township St. Martin city St. Martin township St. Rosa city St. Stephen city St. Wendel township Sartell city Sauk Centre city Sauk Centre township Spring Hill city Spring Hill township Waite Park city Wakefield township Zion township

Stevens Todd Traverse Wadena Wilkin

DISTRICT 008 'Aitkin

County County County County County

County

/

County Total

·District Total

PAGE 21

349 2,173

788 1,616 1,536

124 2,561

767 884

1, 114 314' 289 629

79 239

......... 965 579

1,390 141

81 2,657

37,616 7,549 3,294 2,567

274 525

75 607

1,995 3,549 3,581 1, 111

77 438

5,020 2,461

443

114,827 10,634 23,363

4,463 13,154

7,516

546,887

12,425

02/23/1993



Banton County Alberta township Foley city Gilman city Gilmanton township Glendorado township Granite Ledge township Maywood township Ronneby city St. George township

Carlton County Cass County Chisago County Cook. County Crow Wing County Isanti County Itasca County Kanabec Coun~y

Koochiching County Lake County Mille Lacs County Morrison County

Agram township Belle Prairie township Bellevue township Buckman city Buckman township Buh township Genola city Granite township Harding city Hillman city Hillman township Lakin township Lastrup city Leigh township Little Falls c1ty Little Falls township Morrill township Mount Morris township Pierz city Pierz township Platte township Pulaski township Richardson township Ripley township Royalton city

County Total

County Total

PAGE 22

760 1,854

192 775 762 615 845

58 856

6,717 29,259 21,791 30,521

''-1-. 3,868 44,249 25,921 40,863 12,802 16,299 10,415 18,670

444 1,620

852 201 716 582

85 520·

76 45

167 334 i12 174

7,232 1,532

608 93

1,014 636 369 295 412 607 802

19,528

02/23/1993 PAGE 23



PJ.ne county 211264

St. Louis county 198,213

Sherqurne county Baldwin township 2,909

Becker city 902

Becker township 2,336

Big Lake city 3,113

Big Lake township 4,452

Blue Hill township 763

Clear Lake city 315

qlear Lake township 1,225

Elk River city 11, 143

Livonia township 2,288

Orrock township 1,474

Palmer township PALMER TWP. ."'

CT 0303 B 315 76

CT 0303 B 316 / 29

CT 0303 B 317 46

CT 0303 B 318 41

CT 0303 B 319 37

CT 0303 B 320 161

CT 0303 B 321 0

CT 0303 B 324 6

CT 0303 B 325 0

CT 0303 B 326 44

CT 0303 B 327 10

CT 0303 B 328 19

CT 0303 B 329 9

CT 0303 B 405 0

CT 0303 B 419 12

CT 0303 B 420 0

CT 0303 B 421 17

CT 0303 B 422 77

CT 0303 B 423 33

CT 0303 B 424 9·0

CT 0303 ·a 425 38

CT 0303 B 426 30

CT 0303 B 427 0

CT 0303 B 428 106

CT 0303 B 429 0

CT 0303 B 430 62

CT 0303 B 431 48

CT 0303 B 432 0

CT 0303 B 433 17

CT 0303 B 5018 14


----------City Total 1,022

Princeton city 2

02/23/1993



~ Santiago township Zimmerman city

County Total

District Total

State Total

PAGE 24

789 1, 3 so.

34,083

546,888 ==========

4,375,099

''-'

ii"

l

....

G 0

D

9

B9JV' UBl!IOdOJl9V\I S8!l!8 U!MJ_

UBld IBUO!SS9JDU08 -:µnoo 9lBlS

Documents

or - leg.mn.gov · HPP lb ''32 12: 82F'M Mf'l COURT l:1F HFPEHLS STATI or KINNISOTA SPECIAL REDISTRICTING PA.NIL CS-91-985 Patricia Cotlow, Phillip Krass Sharon Lacomb, James Stein,