Upload
angelica-daniella-goodwin
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Oral Health and
Tobacco Use
Presented by:Laura Romito, DDS, MSKathy Walker, BA
Learning Objectives After attending the session, participants
should be able to: 1. Identify the effects of tobacco use on
oral hard and soft tissues. 2. Provide information about statewide
tobacco cessation resources. 3. Address marketing of smokeless
tobacco products and increased use of these products especially in rural communities.
Smoking Cigarette Cigar Pipe Hookah
Smokeless (spit) Snuff Chew Snus Dissolvable
Tobacco Products
In years past the tobacco industry used frontier images to convey the image of a “real” man, who worked the land and smoked cigarettes. In fact, the Marlboro Man was well known and synonymous with such an image.
Although these images were not necessarily targeting the rural population, they amplified and helped to
maintain social and cultural norms within rural communities.
The Rural Culture
http://tobaccoeval.ucdavis.edu/documents/culture_rural.pdf
Rural Marketing Such belief systems no doubt relate to the significantly
high rate of smokeless tobacco use currently seen in rural populations, where chewing tobacco is viewed as part of being young and male in rural areas
(Campbell-Grossman et al., 2003) In this manner, the tobacco industry exploits the social
and cultural aspects of smokeless tobacco, most easily demonstrated by the tobacco industry’s past and current sponsorship of sporting events such as
rodeos, bull riding and car racing (Pokhrel et al., 2009).
http://tobaccoeval.ucdavis.edu/documents/culture_rural.pdf
Smokeless Use in Rural Areas
Research shows that smokeless tobacco is most common in rural areas. National surveys reveal that a huge gap exists between smokeless tobacco use among rural and urban residents (Pokhrel et al., 2009; Stevens et al.,
2010). According to the National Survey on Drug Use and
Health (2007), the use of smokeless tobacco is almost three times higher in rural areas compared to those who live in large and small metropolitan areas.
The prevalence of smokeless tobacco is highest among young males aged 18 to 24 living in rural areas (Campbell-Grossman, et al., 2003; Boyle et al., 1999).
http://tobaccoeval.ucdavis.edu/documents/culture_rural.pdf
Sweet Shop versus Tobacco Shop
Can you tell the difference?
Melt-Away Tobacco Strips or Chewing Gum?
Tobacco Orbs or Tic Tac’s?
Chewing Tobacco or Breath Mints?
Tobacco Stick or Orange Stick?
PERCENTAGE OF MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WHO EVER TRIED FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS, 2008 IYTS
Middle School6% Smokeless Tobacco9% Cigars8% Black & Mild cigars, Swisher Sweets cigarillos, and/or Phillies Blunt cigars
High School15% Smokeless Tobacco30% Cigars32% Black & Mild cigars, Swisher Sweets cigarillos, and/or Phillies Blunt cigars
CURRENT USE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS AMONG MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS, 2008 IYTS
Middle School10% Any Tobacco Products4% Cigarettes3% Smokeless Tobacco 4% Cigars
High School31% Any Tobacco Products18% Cigarettes8% Smokeless Tobacco 15% Cigars
Smoking Prevalence Education
GED: 43.2%, College: 10.7% Socioeconomic status
Low SES : ~50% Age
18-24 = 24.4%; > 65=8.6% Ethnicity
Native American: 32% Asian American: 13%
MMWR, 2006Mayo Clinic Foundation, 2008
Cancers, CVD, Respiratory diseases Oral effects
Discoloration of teeth and restorations Coated / hairy tongue Reduced sense of taste and smell Smokers’ melanosis Smokers’ palate Oral Candidiasis Dental Caries Increased implant failure rates Periodontal disease Poor wound healing Leukoplakia Carcinoma
Adverse Effects of Tobacco Smoking
The initial interaction of smoking with the human body occurs most often in
the oral cavity, where it would be expected to
be active and exposure to be intense.
Heavy smokers are 4.7 times more likely to develop prematurely wrinkled faces than
non-smokers
Annals of Internal Medicine (1991)
Smokers have decreased clinical signs of inflammation
Impaired bleeding may indicate a faulty
inflammatory vascular response in response to dental plaque resulting
in alterations in the body’s basic gingival defense mechanism
Smoking & Periodontal Status
Nicotine & CO wound healing Decreased blood flow Immune effects
Increased destructive actions of neutrophils Fibroblast impairment Increased prevalence of potential periodontal
pathogens. Protective antibodies are reduced in smokers,
specifically immunoglobulin G to A. actinomycetemcomitans
Smoking & Gum Disease
J. Perio. 2004;74:196-209
Compared to nonsmokers, smoker’s are 4x more likely to have severe periodontal disease
The average 32 yr old smoker has similar perio attachment loss as a 59 yr old nonsmoker!
Continued smoking is an important cause of impaired healing in all aspects of periodontal
treatment
Linde, et al, “Clinical Periodontology” 2008, 5th Edition, pp. 316-322
PMN action intensified in passive smoking Numabe Y, Ogawa T, Kamoi H, et al. Phagocytic function of salivary PMN after smoking or secondary smoking. Ann Periodontol. 1998; 3(1): 102-7.
Periodontal disease: 1.6x more likely in NS exposed to ETS than NS not exposed Arbes SJ, Jr., Agustsdottir H, Slade GD. Environmental tobacco smoke and periodontal disease in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(2): 253-7.
ETS increases periodontal inflammatory responses
Nishida N, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka M, et al. Association between passive smoking and salivary markers related to periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2006; 33(10): 717-23.
Nishida N, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka M, et al. Association between involuntary smoking and salivary markers related to periodontitis: a 2-year longitudinal study. J Periodontol. 2008; 79(12): 2233-40.
Shizukuishi S. Smoking and periodontal disease. Clin Calcium 2007;17(2):226-32.
Does ETS Influence Perio Status?
Implant Failure
Cigarette smoking is an important risk factor for implant failure, especially for those who smoke more than 10 cigarettes a day
Linde, et al, “Clinical Periodontology” 2008, 5th Edition, pp 591, 597
Parental smoking related to caries in young kids (Williams et al, 2000, Sherkin et al 2004)
Active & passive smoking associated with presence of carious permanent teeth (Ayo-Yusef, 2007; Ojima et al 2007)
Possible biological mechanisms Smoking & saliva flow rates & composition Tobacco & the immune system Oral bacteria responses to tobacco
Smoking and Dental Caries
Dental Calculus Cigarette smokers have higher levels of both supra- and sub-gingival calculus than do nonsmokers.
Cessation is accompanied by a reduction in calculus formation
Smoker’s Melanosis
Nicotine Stomatitis
Is strongly associated with reverse smoking, cigar smoking, and a high frequency of pipe and cigarette smoking
Smokeless Tobacco Effects Esthetic Considerations (Stains & Halitosis) Gingival Recession & Bone Loss Abrasion & Dental Caries Hairy Tongue Tobacco Pouch Keratosis Leukoplakia Erythroplakia Squamous cell carcinoma
Gingival Recession and Bone Loss
A positive association exists between ST use and gingival recession, especially among long-term users who also have co-existing gingivitis
Tooth Abrasion & Dental Caries
Sand and grit in ST can significantly wear down occlusal surfaces of teeth
Sugar found in chewing tobacco (especially flavored varieties) can contribute to dental caries
52 M “snuff patch” smokeless tobacco use, 3-
4x daily
Tobacco Pouch Keratosis
Lesion is typically found in vestibule where the tobacco is placed; may extend into the gingiva and buccal mucosa
Most are readily reversible once the habit is discontinued
If lesion persists after one month of cessation, biopsy is recommended
Leukoplakia “A predominantly white lesion of the oral
mucosa that cannot be characterized as any other definable lesion” (WHO, 2003)
20% of oral leukoplakia exhibit dysplastic or cancerous changes; 9-17% will exhibit malignant transformation
Occur mostly where tobacco is held in place Treatment includes biopsies and sometimes
total removal of the lesion
Leukoplakia Is definitely associated with both smoked and smokeless tobacco use.
Is dose related, e.g. positively linked to the frequency, intensity, amount, and length of tobacco use.
Snuff Dipper’s Lesions are Often Reversible
Of 29 subjects using moist snuff, all those who quit (20) showed clinically healthy and histologically normal mucosa after 3-6 months.
J. Oral Pathology (1991) Larsson, Axell, Andersson
Snuff Dipper’s Keratosis
Erythroplakia “Term used to designate a red patch of oral
mucosa that cannot be diagnosed as any specific disease” (Neville, Damm, & White, 2003)
Lesions may be single, multiple, smooth, or pebbly; may be “speckled” with leukoplakia
Mostly affect patients who use tobacco and consume alcoholic beverages
Up to 90% of patients will exhibit severe epithelial dysplasia, carcinoma in-situ, or squamous cell carcinoma
Leading Carcinogens Contained in ST
Tobacco-Specific NitrosaminesPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Radiation-Emitting Polonium
The use of both tobacco and alcohol has a
synergistic effect on the development of OCP
(Oral Cavity and Pharyngeal Cancer),
together causing 80-90% of all new cases of OCP
CancerMMWR 2008; 57 (SS08): 1-33
Carcinoma in-situ and leukoplakia in 50 y o M pipe smoker
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Cancer of the stratified squamous epithelium Accounts for 90% of all oral cancers “Characterized by the invasion of supporting
connective tissue and adjacent structures by malignant squamous epithelial cells” (Neville, Damm, & White, 2003)
80% of all squamous cell carcinomas develop in tobacco users (smokers & ST)
Most patients are 45+ years of age at onset In ST users, occurs mostly where ST is held
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Treatment consists of surgery, radiation therapy, or combinations of both
5-year survival rate 75% for patients with localized intraoral
lesions 40% with lymph node involvement 10% with distant metastasis
Patients are at a significant risk for development of a subsequent intraoral cancerous lesion or upper digestive tract cancer
52 y o AA M Cigarette & Pipe User - Oral Carcinoma
61 y o M Epidermoid (SSC) Carcinoma 50 Pk-Yr History
Oral Screenings
All individuals (particularly tobacco users) should receive regular head
& neck cancer screenings & should be taught to
periodically conduct oral self-exams.
Indiana Tobacco Quitline Fax Referral Highly trained professionals FREE coaching sessions Appropriate materials sent to participant 1-800-QUIT-NOW
What Is A Quitline?Telephone-based Cessation ServicesEvidence-based ProactiveQuit Coaches
Highly trained in cognitive behavioral therapy
240 hours of training
Spanish speaking competency (170 other languages)
Educated up to graduate level
Over 50% with 3+ years prior experience in counseling
Four prearranged calls w/coachTen prearranged calls for pregnant womanWeb coach Unlimited call in privileges and access to coachesSupport Materials
The Participant Experience
Meta-analysis of 13 studies shows 56% increase in quit rates compared to self-help
Accessibility― Eliminates many barriers of traditional classes
(having to wait for classes to form, needing transportation)
― Helpful for those with limited mobility and those in rural or remote areas
― Appeal to those who are reluctant to seek help provided in a group setting
Quitline Effectiveness
Benefits Confidential Free National call number 1-800-QUIT-NOW Provides intensive one-on-one counseling Unlimited access as long as necessary HIPAA-compliant entity Assess ability to all tobacco users Call initiated by quit coach if fax referred by
a provider, employer, or organization.
Join The Preferred Network
Promote the Indiana Tobacco Quitline to patients, employees, and/or clients
Begin referring people who are ready to quit to:
1-800-QUIT-NOW
Provider, Employer,
Organization
Fax Referral
Contact InformationLaura Romito, DDS, MSAssociate ProfessorDirector, Nicotine ProgramDepartment of Oral Biology, Rm B19CIndiana University School of Dentistry1121 West Michigan StreetIndianapolis, IN 46202Ph: 317-278-6210Email: [email protected]
Kathy WalkerFountain/Warren Tobacco Prevention & Cessation ProgramCommunity Action Program, Inc. of Western Indiana418 Washington StreetCovington, IN 47932Ph: 765-793-4881Email: [email protected]