Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Request for Proposal (RFP) for Automation of Credit Enhancement Guarantee Scheme for Scheduled Castes (CEGSSC) and Subsequent Maintenance
& Enhancement & Ongoing Maintenance and Support for Sugar Development Fund (SDF) Portal
Ref No: IFCI/IT-327/2015-16/4823
PRE-BID QUERIES
Organisation : Sify Technologies Ltd. Query / Clarification Sought:
Sl. No. RFP Page No. Clause Details Query/ Suggestion/Clarification
IFCI Response
1 42,43 Payment Terms Suggested Payment Terms : On SRS (System Requirement Study) Sign-Off - 30% On UAT signoff (Inclusive of Data Migration) - 30% Cert-in-Certification - 30% After 3 months of Successful Go live - 10% Please confirm
Payment terms shall remain as specified in RFP
2 12 Development Platform
We would suggest both solution to be on a single platform - Microsoft. This will be easy for implementation and support. Please confirm.
Vendor may propose the Technology, as well as mention the details in the presentation.
3 22 Onsite Resource Engagement
We would suggest an 'Onsite - Offsite' model where certain activities such as requirement gathering and UAT would be done onsite and development and testing as an offsite activity. Please confirm.
The vendor may propose the
engagement model
depending upon the activity
of the project. The vendor
are expected to adhere to
project schedule.
However, Onsite resource engagement is required for Warranty Support and Annual Maintenance Support
2
4 24 Data Migration from the existing applications
Please give details of the systems (technology) from which data needs to be migrated. Information on data structure, format, availability (central / distributed) and volume would be required to size the effort.
SDF Portal is developed using Dot Net and SQL Server 2008. The sample data format and structure be made available in annexure2 & 3.
5 24 Training Please give a list of locations and expected number of end-users at each of these location whom we have to train.
Training would be provided at Delhi. The approximate number of users would be 30.
6 General Do we need to supply the entire hardware and associated software licenses to host and run the solution for the entire contract period? If yes, please provide the specifications for the required infra.
No , Vendor is only required to propose the infrastructure requirement.
7 28, 29 Delivery Timelines
Suggested Timelines - Credit Enhancement Guarantee Scheme for Scheduled Castes (CEGSSC): The implementation duration of the project shall be maximum of sixteen (32) Calendar Weeks for Phase I, and fourteen (30) Calendar Weeks for Phase II Sugar Development Fund (SDF): The implementation duration of the project shall be maximum of fourteen (30) Calendar Weeks from the effective date of Contract.
Both Portals are separate ones . Vendor is expected to complete the project as per the defined schedule in RFP .
3
Organisation: Wipro Ltd.
Sl No
Page No
Clause Query IFCI Response
1 12 Development Platform: Solution provider can provide the solution bespoke using open source architecture
Do Customer want to develop using open Source?
Bidder are expected to propose the development technology.
2 18 Architecture Diagram
Do you required on Oracle database or any database can be used?
Any database can be used
3
No of concurrent user for using this portal
50
4
No of users who will be using this application
The number of users requiring the user id and password of the portal
will be around 2000
5
Do IFCIA is ready for using CAL based solution?
No
6
Please provide the details of workflow approval?
Tentative Workflow is enclosed
7 Cert-IN Audit Do IFCI has any specific agency for doing Audit? If yes, please provide the details?
No, Engagement of Cert-IN Agency is with Vendor Selected.
8 Do IFCIA is required onsite or offshore model for development and support?
The vendor may propose the
engagement model depending
upon the activity of the project.
The vendor are expected to
adhere to project schedule.
However, Onsite resource engagement is required for Warranty Support and Annual Maintenance Support
9 Do IFCI has any plan to migrate the existing portal to latest Technology?
Data Migration of SDF Portal is required.
10 Do IFCI has Ticketing tool for logging issues? If yes, please provide the details, otherwise do we need to factor ticketing tool in this proposal?
No, The vendor shall provide for the same.
11 Do you required mulita lingual site? No , Only English
12 24 Document Management System
Please explain more on Document Management System?
System should have facility to integrate with any standard DMS.
13 Do you required Payment gateway to be integrated? If yes, please provide the details
No
14 Do you required SMS alert notification to be integrated? If yes, please provide the details
Yes, System should have facility to integrate with SMS Gateway .
15 Do IFCI required reporting services? If yes, please provide the details?
Reporting Services are required. The vendor may incorporate appropriate reporting tool.
4
Organisation: Path Infotech Ltd.
Section Page
No Details Query
IFCI Response
Section1 12
Registration of Member
Lending Institution (MLI)
Any Open source Document
Management System is
required for complete
maintenance of documents or
file based document repository
is required which can be
accessed and controlled
through user role and access
managed by Application
Portal should have the
feature for the
documents and
integration with any
standard DMS - Document management
system with user based access,
roles and privileges
Section1 15
General Ledger System is asking for a complete
GL system whereas Basic level
GL system can suffice the
Application Requirement.
The solution proposed
is expected to meet the
functional
requirements.
-System must implement
various General Ledgers and
there reconciliation/
maintenance thereof, GL
posting, Balance Sheet, Profit-
Loss generation, integration
with existing GL system.
Section1 22
Onsite Resource Engagement Is IFCI open for Offline or
Online/ Offsite resource
engagement for Application
Support activities?
The vendor may
propose the
engagement model
depending upon the
activity of the project.
The vendor are
expected to adhere to
project schedule.
However, Onsite
resource engagement is
required for Warranty
Support and Annual
Maintenance Support .
-The vendor is required to
deploy onsite resources for
understanding the
requirements/ trouble shooting
/ new module development
etc. The skillset, experience,
and competency of the
resource being deployed will be
decided based on IFCI’s
preference. The leave of these
onsite resources shall be
governed by the leave Calendar
of IFCI.
5
Section2 23
Change Management As per RFP, total of 350 Man
hours (1.5 Man Months) efforts
are considered for developing
the new modules under Section
1 and 2 (both the Applications).
Please confirm
This is part of change
management during
warranty period and
Annual Maintenance of
Portal. Any new
module where effort is
less than 30 days will
be part of the scope
and no extra payment
will be made.
-Development of new modules
where effort needed is less
than 30 man days will be
considered as part of the scope
and no extra payment shall be
made.
Section2 25
Warranty Support At Page no 29, Annual Support
Maintenance is mentioned as 3
Years whereas as on page 25, 4
years are mentioned. Which is
correct?
3 Years, Correction
required
-The vendor will assume total
responsibility for the fault free
operation of implemented
solution and maintenance
thereon, during the on-site
warranty period of six [6]
Months after acceptance
Certificate issued by IFCI. The
vendor shall provide necessary
maintenance services for
subsequent four years after
end of initial warranty period
of [6] Months.
Section2 25 SDF Portal Please provide us details
around current structure of
SDF portal. For example
Information architecture or Site
Map or any other related
document.
Please refer Annexure 2
& 3 .
6
Annexure
21 88
Pre-Qualification Eligibility
criteria
The current requirement is
more of a web based
application that can be
accessed with the help of
browsers. However, eligibility
parameters leads to web
portal. We would recommend
for corrective action on this. If
possible then we should
consider web application
instead web portal.
Correction to be made.
5 (Marked yellow) to be
changed 2. The bidder should have a
proven track record of
successful implementation of
Five dynamic web portal in
India in last three years on its
own without consortium.
Out of five, the organization
should have the experience of
developing 5 based web portal
for the Government
/PSU/Financial Organization.
Annexure
21 88
Pre-Qualification Eligibility
criteria
We assume that entire
application will be deployed at
IFCI provided data center. Thus
we do not find much of
relevance for ISO 27001 here.
Technical Evaluation
Committee may take a
review.
The bidder must be ISO 9001 &
ISO 27001 certified company
and the certificate needs to be
validity.
7
Organisation: Mastek Limited
S. No.
Section No.
Clause No Reference/
Subject Clarification Sought
IFCI Response
1. Section-I (P12)
General Scope
Development Platform Solution provider can provide the solution bespoke using open source architecture.
1. Is ‘open source architecture’ a mandatory requirement? 2. Alternatively, is it allowed to provide solution on the .net based framework which has been proven and robust due to multiple implementations?
No Comments
2. Application Processing
o Authorize
Application -
capability for IFCI
user to authorize
applications (P13)
1. Please explain the process of authorizing the application of the debtor to MLI by IFCI.
Indicative Workflow of the scheme is enclosed
3. Accounting Module (P13)
The system must handle end to end automated processing of all payments, fees, interest calculation, overdue, fines etc. The vendor has to completely automate the accounting of Guarantees sanctioned. All financial transactions would be done using the system.
1. It is assumed that IFCI provides the guarantee to MLIs for lending the funds to the end customers (CEGSSC). Therefore, these transactions except the Guarantee Fee and related charges do not enter the Books of Account of IFCI. Probably, the IFCI may not execute its subrogation rights directly and assign it to MLI. In this context, please explain ‘end to end processing…’ and ‘all financial transactions’ scope. 2. Prior to undertaking the CEGSSC responsibility, was IFCI involved in directly providing Credits to its Industrial Customers without involving the MLIs? Does this broad description of the Accounting Module refer to these aspects? Does the RFP scope include all these earlier activities also?
The end to end processing covers all the sub heads in the Accounting Module.
The description mentioned in the RFP are only related to the CEGSSC
4. Funds Management
(P15)
The system must be capable to manage/maintain funds for the said scheme.
1. Is it referring to CEGSSC? What about the earlier ongoing business with the Industrial customers?
The descriptions mentioned in the RFP are only related to the CEGSSC scheme. The CEGSSC corpus needs to managed/ maintained.
5. Section II (P25)
Warranty Support
The vendor shall provide necessary
Financial bid format says post warranty support is required for 3 years whereas warranty
3 Years, Correction required
8
maintenance services for subsequent four years after end of initial warranty period of [6] Months
support clause on page 25 says four years support required. Please clarify.
6 .
Section I (P20)
Team and Staffing
If there is any
change in the Team
Structure before
the end of
Warranty period, a
penalty of 5% of
Total Cost of
Ownership (TCO)
will be imposed on
the vendor.
Attrition rate is one of the highest in IT industry hence such penalty clause will act as deterrent for bidders. Since most of the IT companies have adopted CMMi L5 certification, they are process oriented rather than people oriented. However in case of any team member change, bidder will inform IFCI one month in advance and appoint new resource with same experience and qualification after proper handholding. IFCI may interview the candidate before appointment. Request you to please remove this penalty clause.
Already clarified in Pre-bid Meeting
7. Annexure 17
(P83)
Project Management Guidelines
No more than 1
change in the Team
Structure is
allowed during
each year of
Annual
Maintenance,
failing which, a
penalty of 5% of
Annual
Maintenance
Charges (AMC)
will be imposed on
the vendor.
Attrition rate is one of the highest in IT industry hence such penalty clause will act as deterrent for bidders. Since most of the IT companies have adopted CMMi L5 certification, they are process oriented rather than people oriented. However in case of any team member change, bidder will inform IFCI one month in advance and appoint new resource with same experience and qualification after proper handholding. IFCI may interview the candidate before appointment. Request you to please remove this penalty clause.
Already clarified in Pre-bid Meeting
8 Annexure 16, Page
82
Evaluation & Award
Criteria – pt.2
Supporting Document: The bidder must also enclose an undertaking stating that all the manpower deployed for execution of the contract would
Request you to allow subcontracting for enhancing the skills of the bidder for some proposed of the proposed such as DBA, Optimizer and Network Administrator etc. As these are specialized roles and will enhance the capabilities of
Already clarified in Pre-bid Meeting
9
be employees of the bidder’s company and under its own payroll
Prime bidder in project execution.
9 General We request you to allow bidders to propose the onsite/offshore model wherein the team will travel onsite on need basis as per the project requirements and will develop the application or carryout enhancement and AMC support activities from offshore. Please confirm?
The vendor may propose the engagement model depending upon the activity of the project. The vendor are expected to adhere to project schedule
10 Section-I (P12)
Document Management
System (P15)
‘No details provided about Application / Portal functionality to be provided using DMS!
1. Is DMS referring to the COTS? 2. What all features of the DMS are to be used and for which functions?
Portal should handle all the documents and integration with any standard DMS is required.
11 Section-I
(P12)
User Support (P15)
…. Complain will be auto transferred to the selected implementing agency and nodal officer of the portal for further escalation….
1. Does ‘selected implementing agency’ means ‘multiple agencies’? 2. Under what circumstances will there be multiple agencies for the Portal?
No, it seems understanding gap. A helpdesk module for external users is envisaged to address the Queries raised by the Users.
12 Section-I
(P12)
Context Diagram of
CEGSSC (P16)
Foot Note: Note: Please refer to Annexure 21 for scheme details and tentative report formats.
1. Annexure 21 (P88) is about ‘Pre-
Qualification Eligibility criteria’
while Annexure 22 Scheme Details
and Tentative Report Formats
(P89-100) & Annexure – I Credit
Enhancement Guarantee Scheme
for Scheduled Castes (SCs) (P101-
102) & CHAPTER II: SCOPE
AND EXTENT OF THE
SCHEME (P103 to 105 it is 102
due to error) contain the Scheme
Details.
2. Please confirm the above
observations.
Typo Error in RFP . Observations are in order.
13 Section II Enhancement, Ongoing
Maintenance and Support
for Sugar Development Fund (SDF)
Portal (P22 - )
1. There is a confusion about the Scope related to the existing non-CEGSSC Business Activities of IFCI, CEGSSC Portal and SDF Portal. 2. Please clarify.
No Comments.
10
Annexure I
START
MLI through its regional office, after in-principle
approval for the proposal, requests IFCI for
issuance of Registration No. for the loan
application
IFCI issues registration number to the MLI
Sanction letter
received within
stipulated time?
MLI sends the sanction letter to IFCI within 30
days/stipulated time
IFCI Cancels the Registration
number
STOP
IFCI issues Guarantee Payment Notice(GPN) to
MLI’s ZO, for payment of guarantee fees. IFCI
conveys the Unique Borrower ID and Guarantee
cover through GPN
Continued on Page
2
MLI requests for extension
for validity of registration
number
Extension
Granted?
No
NO
Proposal satisfies
the eligibility
criterion
IFCI Conveys to MLI that
the guarantee cover
request is not eligible
STOP
NO
YES
11
MLI pays the Guarantee fees within 30 days of
first disbursement of loan/GPN, which ever is
later but not later than 90 days in any case
MLI pays the
fees in time
IFCI follows up with MLI if the fees is
not paid within 30 days
Fees paid
before 90
days
IFCI Cancels the
Registration
number/Guarantee
Cover after approval
from the competent
authority
STOP
IFCI confirms the issuance of guarantee cover.
IFCI issues the letter for Payment of Annual
renewal fees(ARF) to be paid by MLI.
MLI pays the ARF
within time?
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
Continued on Page
3
MLI seeks extension
of Payment of ARF.
Extension Granted?
YES
12
On Receipt of Annual Renewal Fees
Payment in the
accounts are regular
through-out the
tenure of loan?
The account is closed by
repayment of loan
IFCI, for closure of account,
issues letter to MLI after
receiving ‘No due certificate’
from MLI.
STOP
If the account becomes NPA, MLI post doing
mandatory recovery efforts, as mentioned in the
scheme, files claim after guarantee invocation
with IFCI.
IFCI Checks the documents and satisfies
whether the guarantee invocation has
been as per the extant guidelines.
Continued on Page 4
Claim is as per the
extant guidelines?
No Claim Eligibility, So IFCI cancels the
Guarantee cover after approval from
Competent Authority
YES
NO
YES
NO
13
IFCI shall pay the 75% of the amount in
default within 30 days of preferring the
claim by MLI and receiving NOC from
MOSJ&E and subsequently from C.A.
On Conclusion of recovery proceedings
and post appropriation of the recovery
amount towards recovery expenses of
MLI, The remaining amount is being
appropriated between MLI and IFCI as
per the extant guidelines.
After approval from Competent
Authority, IFCI issues the letter of
account closure to MLI.
STOP
14
Annexure 2
15 Annexure 3