6
647 Original Article Reliability of the original Lehnert-Schroth (LS) scoliosis classification in physiotherapy practice Maksym Borysov 1) , Xiaofeng Nan 2) , Hans-Rudolf Weiss, MD 3)* , Deborah Turnbull, BSc 4) , Alexander Kleban, PhD 5) 1) Orttech-plus Rehabilitation Service, Ukraine 2) Nan Xiaofeng’s Spinal Orthopedic Workshop, China 3) Orthopedic Rehabilitation Service: Alzeyer Str. 23, D-55457 Gensingen, Germany 4) The London Orthotic Consultancy, UK 5) Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia Abstract. [Purpose] The foundations of the scoliosis specific and evidence-based physiotherapy program ac- cording to Schroth is the original the Lehnert-Schroth (LS) classification which is still in use today. The purpose of this paper is to test the reliability of the LS classification system, using clinical and radiological images of scoliosis patients as classified by specialist experienced clinicians. [Participants and Methods] A list of 40 pictures of X-Rays and a list of 40 clinical pictures (all posterior trunk images) of patients with idiopathic scoliosis were provided by the second author. Three specialist professional physiotherapists or orthotists rated all clinical and radiological pictures according to these two patterns of the LS classification. [Results] The intra-observer Kappa value was 0.90 (clinical) and 1.00 (x-rays). The inter-observer Kappa values at average was 0.65 (clinical) and 0.71 (x-rays). [Conclusion] For the application of classifying the patients when prescribing postural advice and exercises from the Schroth program the LS-classification seems an easy to use and highly reliable tool. This test demonstrated sufficient reliability with respect to the x-rays, but the tests of the clinical pictures alone, demonstrated fair levels of reliability, which indi- cates that it is an appropriate tool for physiotherapists when an x-ray is not available. Key words: Scoliosis, Physiotherapy, Classification (This article was submitted Feb. 1, 2020, and was accepted Jul. 17, 2020) INTRODUCTION Scoliosis—as a three-dimensional deformity of the spine and trunk—is not a uniform condition and may have different causes (e.g. congenital, neuromuscular, other rare diseases). The most common cause is the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with 80−90% of all scoliosis conditions 1–3) . Treatment of scoliosis consists of physiotherapy, brace treatment and spinal fusion surgery. While there is high quality evi- dence for specialist physiotherapy 4–7) and brace treatment 8–12) evidence for surgery is still lacking 13–18) . During the pubertal growth spurt, patients at higher risk for the scoliosis to progress, bracing is the primary treatment supported by physiotherapy, whilst in patients with a lower risk of progression, physiotherapy can be considered the primary choice of treatment 3, 6) . Today there are many different approaches of physiotherapy suggested for the treatment of signs and symptoms of sco- liosis 6) , however, high quality evidence has been obtained for the Schroth method only, with a randomized controlled study providing a comparative untreated control group 7) . Besides its impact on the angle of curvature (Cobb angle) the Schroth method may improve many other signs and symptoms of a scoliosis. Vital capacity, right cardiac strain, muscle endurance and pain can be improved, besides quality of life and other psychological parameters 6) . J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 32: 647–652, 2020 *Corresponding author. Hans-Rudolf Weiss (E-mail: [email protected]) ©2020 The Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Deriva- tives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Original Article Reliability of the original Lehnert

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Original Article Reliability of the original Lehnert

647

Original Article

Reliability of the original Lehnert-Schroth (LS) scoliosis classification in physiotherapy practice

Maksym Borysov1), Xiaofeng Nan2), Hans-Rudolf Weiss, MD3)*, Deborah Turnbull, BSc4), Alexander Kleban, PhD5)

1) Orttech-plus Rehabilitation Service, Ukraine2) Nan Xiaofeng’s Spinal Orthopedic Workshop, China3) Orthopedic Rehabilitation Service: Alzeyer Str. 23, D-55457 Gensingen, Germany4) The London Orthotic Consultancy, UK5) Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia

Abstract. [Purpose]The foundations of the scoliosis specific and evidence-based physiotherapyprogramac-cordingtoSchrothistheoriginaltheLehnert-Schroth(LS)classificationwhichisstillinusetoday.ThepurposeofthispaperistotestthereliabilityoftheLSclassificationsystem,usingclinicalandradiologicalimagesofscoliosispatientsasclassifiedbyspecialistexperiencedclinicians.[ParticipantsandMethods]Alistof40picturesofX-Raysandalistof40clinicalpictures(allposteriortrunkimages)ofpatientswithidiopathicscoliosiswereprovidedbythesecondauthor.ThreespecialistprofessionalphysiotherapistsororthotistsratedallclinicalandradiologicalpicturesaccordingtothesetwopatternsoftheLSclassification.[Results]Theintra-observerKappavaluewas0.90(clinical)and1.00(x-rays).Theinter-observerKappavaluesataveragewas0.65(clinical)and0.71(x-rays).[Conclusion]FortheapplicationofclassifyingthepatientswhenprescribingposturaladviceandexercisesfromtheSchrothprogramtheLS-classificationseemsaneasytouseandhighlyreliabletool.Thistestdemonstratedsufficientreliabilitywithrespecttothex-rays,butthetestsoftheclinicalpicturesalone,demonstratedfairlevelsofreliability,whichindi-catesthatitisanappropriatetoolforphysiotherapistswhenanx-rayisnotavailable.Key words:Scoliosis,Physiotherapy,Classification

(This article was submitted Feb. 1, 2020, and was accepted Jul. 17, 2020)

INTRODUCTION

Scoliosis—asathree-dimensionaldeformityofthespineandtrunk—isnotauniformconditionandmayhavedifferentcauses(e.g.congenital,neuromuscular,otherrarediseases).Themostcommoncauseistheadolescentidiopathicscoliosis(AIS)with80−90%ofallscoliosisconditions1–3).

Treatmentofscoliosisconsistsofphysiotherapy,bracetreatmentandspinalfusionsurgery.Whilethereishighqualityevi-denceforspecialistphysiotherapy4–7)andbracetreatment8–12)evidenceforsurgeryisstilllacking13–18).Duringthepubertalgrowthspurt,patientsathigherriskforthescoliosistoprogress,bracingistheprimarytreatmentsupportedbyphysiotherapy,whilstinpatientswithalowerriskofprogression,physiotherapycanbeconsideredtheprimarychoiceoftreatment3, 6).

Todaytherearemanydifferentapproachesofphysiotherapysuggestedforthetreatmentofsignsandsymptomsofsco-liosis6),however,highqualityevidencehasbeenobtainedfortheSchrothmethodonly,witharandomizedcontrolledstudyprovidingacomparativeuntreatedcontrolgroup7).Besidesitsimpactontheangleofcurvature(Cobbangle)theSchrothmethodmayimprovemanyothersignsandsymptomsofascoliosis.Vitalcapacity,rightcardiacstrain,muscleenduranceandpaincanbeimproved,besidesqualityoflifeandotherpsychologicalparameters6).

J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 32: 647–652, 2020

*Correspondingauthor.Hans-RudolfWeiss(E-mail:[email protected])©2020TheSocietyofPhysicalTherapyScience.PublishedbyIPECInc.

Thisisanopen-accessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionNon-CommercialNoDeriva-tives(by-nc-nd)License.(CC-BY-NC-ND4.0:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

The Journal of Physical Therapy Science

Page 2: Original Article Reliability of the original Lehnert

J. Phys. Ther. Sci. Vol. 32, No. 10, 2020 648

TheoriginalSchrothmethodfirststartedin1921onanin-patientbasisandhassincebeendevelopedfurther3,19).Whilethe original Schrothmethod programwasmainly used for large single thoracic curves (over 60 degreesCobb angle atdiagnosis)inthelate1970stheintermediatedevelopmentalsoincludedmajorlumbarcurvaturesandthiswasthebeginningofthepatternspecificphysiotherapytreatmentofscoliosisandtheseparationof3and4curveclassificationpatterns3,19).Lehnert-Schrothtermedthemajorthoraciccurves(functional)3-curvepatterns(3C)andthemajorlumbaranddoublemajorcurves(functional)4-curvepatterns(4C)3,19,20).

ThemostrecentdevelopmentoftheSchrothmethodtodayistheSchrothBestPracticeprogram3), also including correc-tionsofthesagittalplanedeformityaswellastheoriginalaugmentedcorrectivemovementsandpatternspecificactivitiesofdailyliving(ADLs)startingwiththefirstpublicationsin200621, 22).ThismorerecentdevelopmentalsoencompassesthesimpleLehnert-Schroth(LS)classificationdistinguishingbetween3Cand4Cpatterns3).

Someotherclassificationshavebeendevelopedsincethe1980ssupportingpatternspecificapproachesofsurgery23, 24) and bracetreatment3, 25–27),howeverforphysiotherapytreatmentofanidiopathicscoliosistheLSclassificationwiththesetwodistinctivepatternsisthemostsimplifiedversionandisstillusedworldwidetoday3,19).ThepurposeofthispaperistotestthereliabilityoftheLSclassificationwithrespecttotheclinicalandtheradiologicalaspectsofscoliosispatients.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

DescriptionoftheLS-classification:AccordingtoSchrothterminology3,19),patternspecificphysiotherapyneedstodis-tinguishbetween‘functional3-curvescoliosis’and‘functional4-curvescoliosis’,foritbespecific(Fig.1).Withfunctional3-curvescoliosis, theshoulder-necksection, the thoracicsection,and the lumbo-pelvicsectionare twistedandaskewinfrontal,sagittal,andtransverseplanes(Fig.2).

Withfunctional4-curvescoliosis,thelumbo-pelvicsectionisfurthersubdividedintoalumbarsectionandapelvicsection,withthepelvisbeingseenasanadditionalfunctionalcurvaturethatservesasastartingpointforanindependentcorrectionprincipleinthecontextofthetailoredphysiotherapeutictreatment(Fig.3).Withfunctional3-curvescoliosiswedistinguishbetweenscoliosiswithalaterallyprominentpelvisonthethoracicconcaveside(=3CH)andfunctional3-curvescoliosisandacentredpelvis(=3C;Fig.2).

Functional4-curvescoliosisisdistinguishedbytheprominenceofthehiponthethoracicconvexside(=4C;Fig.3).Typi-cally,thereisastructurallumbarorthoracolumbarcurvatureandthelumbarspineproceedsfromthesacruminanobliquemovement,alsoknownas‘obliquetakeoff’28).

Methodology:40differentAISpatientswereselectedfromthedatabaseofthesecondauthor.Provisionof(a)theclinicalpicturesofallthepatients(posteriortrunkviews)and(b)theX-RaysofthesepatientsonaPDFwithoutanyidentifiablemarkingsandthesewerethennumberedconsecutively.Theparticipantswereselectedwiththefollowinginclusioncriteria:Adolescentidiopathicscoliosis(AIS),Age12−16years,Cobbanglebetween35and50°Cobb.

Bothlistsincludedbothcurvaturetypes.X-RaysandclinicalpictureswerenumberedinadifferentordertoavoidtheprofessionalsinvolveddrawingconclusionsfromtheX-Raywhenratingtheclinicalpictureorviceversa.

ClinicianMB(specialisedphysiotherapistandorthotist)ratedallclinicalandradiologicalpicturestwicewithoutaccesstothepreviousratingsinordertodeterminetheinter-raterreliabilityoftheclassification.

ClinicianXFN (specialisedorthotist) andclinicianDT (specialisedphysiotherapist) ratedall clinical and radiological

Fig. 1. TheLS-Classification.Ontheleftthetypical3Cscoliosiswiththreeblocksdeviatedandrotatedagainsteachother.Ontherightthetypical4Cscoliosis(doublemajor)withfourblocksdeviatedandrotatedagainsteachother.Thearrowsindicatethefrontalplanecorrectionoftheblocksagainsteachother(courtesyoftheSchrothBestPractiseacademywithkindpermission).SB:shoulderblock;TB:thoracicblock;LPB:lumbopelvicblock;LB:lumbarblock;PB:pelvicblock.

Page 3: Original Article Reliability of the original Lehnert

649

picturesonce inorder todetermine the inter-rater reliabilityof theclassificationwithrespect toclinicalandradiologicalviews.TheirresultswerealsocomparedtothefirstratingofclinicianMB.

Intra-observer(performedbyMB)andinter-observerKappavalues(performedbyMB,XFN,DT)werecalculatedforthisclassificationwithrespecttotheclinicalanswers,aswellastheradiologicalanswers.

Fig. 2. Keyfeaturesofthefunctional3CpatternaccordingtoSchroth(courtesyoftheSchrothBestPracticeacademywithkindpermission).

Fig. 3. Keyfeaturesofthefunctional4CpatternaccordingtoSchroth(courtesyoftheSchrothBestPracticeacademywithkindpermis-sion).

Page 4: Original Article Reliability of the original Lehnert

J. Phys. Ther. Sci. Vol. 32, No. 10, 2020 650

Anethics approval and consent toparticipatewasnot applicable.Noanimalswereused for studiesof this research.Writteninformedconsentforparticipationinthisstudyhasbeenobtainedfromboththepatientsandtheirparents;Consentforpublication:Writteninformedconsentforpublicationofthepatient’sinformation(X-rays,photos,records,etc.)hasbeenobtainedfromboththepatientsandtheirparents.

RESULTS

Theintra-observerKappavaluewas0.90(acceptance>0.60)fortheevaluationofthereliabilityoftheclinicalpicturesand1.00fortheevaluationofthex-raypictures.Theinter-observerKappavaluesfluctuatedfrom0.58to0.80(average0.65;acceptance>0.60)fortheevaluationofthereliabilityoftheclinicalpicturesandfluctuatedfrom0.58to0.80(average0.71)fortheevaluationofthereliabilityofthex-raypictures.

DISCUSSION

In this test the intrarater reliabilityof theLS-classificationwas excellentwith respect to clinicalpictures andx-rays.Interraterreliabilityataveragewasexceedingthelevelofacceptability.Theclassificationhasshowntohaveafairtogoodreliabilityclinicallyandradiologically29,30).Thiscurvepatternspecificclassificationisusedtoprescribeexercisetreatmentapproachesforindividualpatients3,6,19).Accordingtotheresultsfromthisstudytheuseofthisclassificationcanberecom-mendedforspecialistSchrothcertifiedphysiotherapists in thefunctional rehabilitationusing thepatternspecificSchrothmethod.Thistestdemonstratedsufficientreliabilitywithrespecttothex-rays,butthetestsoftheclinicalpicturesalonealsodemonstratedfairlevelsofreliability,whichindicatesthatitisanappropriatetoolforphysiotherapistswhenanx-rayisnotavailable.Althoughitisalwayswisetogainanimageofthex-raytoconfirmboththediagnosisandthepattern.

WithinthepatternspecificSchrothprogramitisnecessarytodistinguishbetweencertainpatternsofcurvature.Onlywithpatternspecificcorrectivemovementscanoneachieve thebestpossiblecorrectionandavoidan increaseofanycountercurvessametime3,19,20).

Whilethe3Cpatternofcorrectionincludesshiftingandde-rotationoftheshoulder-,thoracic-andlumbo-pelvicblockagainsteachother(Fig.4)withinthe4Ccorrectionthelumbopelvicblockissplitupintoalumbarandapelvicblockwhichareshiftedandde-rotatedagainsteachotherseparately(Fig.5).Thesebasicprinciplesofcorrectionhavealsobeenusedforpatternspecificbracinginitsearlierstages31)whiletodayforbracingslightlymorecomplexclassificationsareused3,27–29).

Physiotherapistscurrentlyhavenospecialiststandardisedtrainingintheirgeneralisedundergraduateordiplomacoursesworldwideregardingthetreatmentofscoliosiswhichmayhaveledtothelackofinvolvementoftherapistsintreatment,un-lessforadultsreportingpainorpost-operativerecovery.Foraconditionthatismusculoskeletalandorthopaedicatleastinitspresentationthisprofessionisnotwidelyorspeciallyeducatedinthemainstream.Orthotiststrainingalsovariesworldwideandtheprofessioncanbepoorlyregulatedincomparisontootherhealthprofessionsandorthoticsforscoliosisarerarelystandardisedorevenspecifiedwhenprescribing.

IfthestandardofconservativephysiotherapytreatmentisSchroth,thenareliablereferenceclassificationtoolisrequiredwhichisalsoreliablebetweenprofessionals,whichtheLSclassificationhasdemonstrated.Asalreadyoutlined,thereisagrowingbodyofevidenceforSchrothphysiotherapytreatment,asthisclassificationisnotonlysimplebutalsoreliableandstandardized,andthereforeshouldbeintegratedintophysiotherapyeducationalprograms.Itisonlythroughthesuccessfulidentificationofthespecificpattern,canaprofessionalthenidentifytheeffectivepattern-specificexercisesandposturestoprescribe.

Limitationofthisstudyisthesmallnumberofparticipants.Forfuturestudieswithinthistopicalargernumberofpar-ticipantsshouldbeinvestigated.Anotherlimitationisthatsomepatientshavebeenincludedwhowerealreadyunderbracetreatment(n=15),anintervention,whichmighthaveledtoachangeofthetrunkdeformity.Thismightbethereasonwhytheclinicalapplicationoftheclassificationwaslessreliablethantheradiologicapplication.Besidesthedorsalaspectofthetrunktheadditionalinformationinforwardbendingwouldalsopossiblyimprovethereliability,asthestructuraldeformityismorevisibleintheforwardbendingtest.Thisisthefirsttimethataclinicalandradiologicalreliabilitytestforascoliosisclassificationhasbeenmade.However,weactuallyhavenodataaboutthereliabilitycomparingtheclinicalvs.radiologicalclassification.Thisaspectshouldbeinvestigatedinfuturestudiesonthistopicaswell.

Inconclusion:FortheapplicationoftheexercisesfromtheSchrothprogramtheLS-classificationseemsaneasytouseandreliabletoolandshouldbeconsideredimportantintheeducationofprofessionalsprescribingexercisesforpatientwithscoliosis.

Conflict of interestHRWisreceivingfinancialsupportforattendingsymposiaandhasreceivedroyaltiesfromKoobGmbH&CoKG.The

companyisheldbythespouseofHRW.HRWhasheldapatentonasagittalrealignmentbrace(EP1604624A1).DTisemployedbyanorthotistcompanyprovidingspecialistphysiotherapyforspinalandchest/pectusdeformities.Noneoftheotherauthorsreportanycompetinginterestorpotentialconflictofinterest.

Page 5: Original Article Reliability of the original Lehnert

651

ACKNOwLEDgEMENTS

HRWprovidedthefirstdraftandmadetheliteraturereviewandservedasthestudysupervisor.DTcontributedtotheim-provementofthefirstdraft,copyeditedthefinalpaperandprovidedtheindividualanalysisofthedata.XFNhasprovidedtheclinicalpicturesofthepatientsaswellastheirx-rays.AK(PhDinMathematics)wasinchargeofstatisticaltesting.MBsupervisedtheratings.XFN,MBandDTwhereperformingtheratingswithMBprovidingtheintratesterratings.

REFERENCES

1) AsherMA,BurtonDC:Adolescentidiopathicscoliosis:naturalhistoryandlongtermtreatmenteffects.Scoliosis,2006,1:2.[Medline] [CrossRef]2) GoldbergCJ,MooreDP,FogartyEE,etal.:Adolescent idiopathicscoliosis:naturalhistoryandprognosis.StudHealthTechnolInform,2002,91:59–63.

[Medline]3) WeissHR,Lehnert-SchrothC,MoramarcoMet al.:Schroth therapy—advancements in conservative scoliosis treatment2nd international edition.Saar-

bruecken:LambertAcademicPublishing(LAP),2018.

Fig. 4. Patientwithafunctional3Cpattern(left)correctedwiththoracicshiftandpelvictilttothethoracicconvexside(withkindpermissionbyLambertAcademicPublishing3)).

Fig. 5. Patientwithafunctional4Cpattern(left)correctedwiththoracicshiftandpelvictilttothethoracicconcaveside(withkindpermissionbyLambertAcademicPublishing3)).

Page 6: Original Article Reliability of the original Lehnert

J. Phys. Ther. Sci. Vol. 32, No. 10, 2020 652

4) WeissHR,WeissG,PetermannF:Incidenceofcurvatureprogressioninidiopathicscoliosispatientstreatedwithscoliosisin-patientrehabilitation(SIR):anage-andsex-matchedcontrolledstudy.PediatrRehabil,2003,6:23–30.[Medline] [CrossRef]

5) RomanoM,MinozziS,Bettany-SaltikovJ,etal.:Exercisesforadolescentidiopathicscoliosis.CochraneDatabaseSystRev,2012,8:CD007837.[Medline]6) WeissHR,MoramarcoMM,BorysovM,etal.:Posturalrehabilitationforadolescentidiopathicscoliosisduringgrowth.AsianSpineJ,2016,10:570–581.

[Medline] [CrossRef]7) KuruT,Yeldanİ,DereliEE,etal.:Theefficacyofthree-dimensionalSchrothexercisesinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis:arandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrial.

ClinRehabil,2016,30:181–190.[Medline] [CrossRef]8) NachemsonAL,PetersonLE:Effectivenessoftreatmentwithabraceingirlswhohaveadolescentidiopathicscoliosis.Aprospective,controlledstudybased

ondatafromtheBraceStudyoftheScoliosisResearchSociety.JBoneJointSurgAm,1995,77:815–822.[Medline] [CrossRef]9) DanielssonAJ,HasseriusR,OhlinA,etal.:Aprospectivestudyofbracetreatmentversusobservationaloneinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis:afollow-up

meanof16yearsaftermaturity.Spine,2007,32:2198–2207.[Medline] [CrossRef]10) WeinsteinSL,DolanLA,WrightJG,etal.:Effectsofbracinginadolescentswithidiopathicscoliosis.NEnglJMed,1512–15,2013:21.[Medline]11) FangMQ,WangC,XiangGH,etal.:Long-termeffectsoftheChêneaubraceoncoronalandsagittalalignmentinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis.JNeurosurg

Spine,2015,23:505–509.[Medline] [CrossRef]12) WeissHR,TurnbullD,SeibelS,etal.:Firstend-resultofaprospectivecohortwithAIStreatedwithaCADChêneaustylebrace.JPhysTherSci,2019,31:

983–991.[Medline] [CrossRef]13) HawesM:Impactofspinesurgeryonsignsandsymptomsofspinaldeformity.PediatrRehabil,2006,9:318–339.[Medline] [CrossRef]14) WeissHR,GoodallD:Thetreatmentofadolescentidiopathicscoliosis(AIS)accordingtopresentevidence.Asystematicreview.EurJPhysRehabilMed,

2008,44:177–193.[Medline]15) Bettany-SaltikovJ,WeissHR,ChockalingamN,etal.:Surgicalversusnon-surgicalinterventionsinpeoplewithadolescentidiopathicscoliosis.Cochrane

DatabaseSystRev,2015,10:CD010663.[Medline]16) CheukDK,WongV,WraigeE,etal.:SurgeryforscoliosisinDuchennemusculardystrophy.CochraneDatabaseSystRev,2015,10:CD005375.[Medline]17) Bettany-SaltikovJ,WeissHR,ChockalingamN,etal.:Acomparisonofpatient-reportedoutcomemeasures followingdifferent treatmentapproaches for

adolescentswithsevereidiopathicscoliosis:asystematicreview.AsianSpineJ,2016,10:1170–1194.[Medline] [CrossRef]18) WardWT,FrielNA,KenkreTS,etal.:SRS-22rscoresinnon-operatedadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientswithcurvesgreaterthanfortydegrees.Spine,

2017,42:1233–1240.[Medline] [CrossRef]19) Lehnert-SchrothC:Three-dimensionaltreatmentforscoliosis.PaloAlto:TheMartindalePress,2007.20) Lehnert-SchrothC:UnsereErfahrungenmiteinemVerkürzungsausgleichinderSkoliosebehandlung.OrthopPrax,1981,27:255–262.21) WeissHR,KleinR:Improvingexcellenceinscoliosisrehabilitation:acontrolledstudyofmatchedpairs.PediatrRehabil,2006,9:190–200.[Medline] [Cross-

Ref]22) WeissHR,HollaenderM,KleinR:ADLbasedscoliosisrehabilitation—thekeytoanimprovementoftime-efficiency?StudHealthTechnolInform,2006,123:

594–598.[Medline]23) KingHA:Selectionoffusionlevelsforposteriorinstrumentationandfusioninidiopathicscoliosis.OrthopClinNorthAm,1988,19:247–255.[Medline]24) LenkeLG,BetzRR,BridwellKH,etal.:Intraobserverandinterobserverreliabilityoftheclassificationofthoracicadolescentidiopathicscoliosis.JBoneJoint

SurgAm,1998,80:1097–1106.[Medline] [CrossRef]25) RigoM:Intraobserverreliabilityofanewclassificationcorrelatingwithbracetreatment.PediatrRehabil,2004,7:63.26) RigoMD,VillagrasaM,GalloD:Aspecificscoliosisclassificationcorrelatingwithbracetreatment:descriptionandreliability.Scoliosis,2010,5:1.[Medline]

[CrossRef]27) WeissHR:“Bracetechnology”thematicseries-theGensingenbrace™inthetreatmentofscoliosis.Scoliosis,2010,5:22.[Medline] [CrossRef]28) FiskJR,WinterRB,MoeJH:Thelumbosacralcurveinidiopathicscoliosis.Itssignificanceandmanagement.JBoneJointSurgAm,1980,62:39–46.[Med-

line] [CrossRef]29) LandisJR,KochGG:Themeasurementofobserveragreementforcategoricaldata.Biometrics,1977,33:159–174.[Medline] [CrossRef]30) FleissJL:Statisticalmethodsforratesandproportions(Wileyseriesinprobabilityandstatistics),2nded.NewYork:Wiley-Interscience,1981,p218.31) WeissHR,RigoM,ChêneauJ:PraxisderChêneau-KorsettversorgunginderSkoliosetherapie,Stuttgart:Thieme,2000.