Original Petition Affidavit

8/19/2019 Original Petition Affidavit

1/13

Sco

rr

th;

jAil

t

i]

:$it

Jan 15,2016

Between:

And:

preine

Couft

of

British

THE LAW SOCIETY OF

BRITISH COLUMBIA

Marc Pierre

Boyer

RESPONSE TO PETITION

RE: File

No:

S-

15107

Vancouver

Registry

Columbia

Petitioner

Respondent

83

Filed

by :

Marc Pierre

Boyer

acting under our districts'fiduciary trust

as

CFA

for several Marijuana Party

Electoral

District

Associations

[EDA]

4-858 East 66 Ave. Vancouver

BC,

VST 1 M1

[EDA

headquarters]

THIS lS

A

RESPONSE TO

the

petition

filed

BY:

The

Law

Society

of British

Columbia

845

Gambie

Street,

Vancouver,

BC,

VGB

429

Petitioner'sLawyer

MichealKleisinger

The Law

Society of

British Columbia

845

Cambie

Street,

Vancouver

BC, V6B 4Zg

JAN

18

Z01E

yi

LAW

SOCIETY OF B.C,

Part

1:

ORDERS

CCTISENTED TO:

As expressed

in

the attached

PROTEST

Synopsis

of

Part 1: Marc Boyer asked for

and would

like to consent to

proceed

with

responding

to

points

1 thru

4 of

this Petition

/case. But,

lwon't

consent to be mistaken

by

this

pedantic trap to consent

to

being an all capitals

ENTITY

A basic understanding

can be established

at

this

First

Appearance,

in

order

to

proceed properly,

by

this court

addressing

the following courses, NAMELY:

1)

Declared

that

all assumptions

of

holding

special recognition

are dismissed, or

(2)

Rule

that my bond has

a

face value

that

needs

to

be established

[for

example] under the

PPSA;

[8y

pro

ceeding under

another

Act?l

Part

2:

ORDERS

OPPOSED:

We oppose the

granting

of any order that the BAR desires to

implement

in

points

1

thru 4 of

this

Petition.

As

we see

it,

we have been extended

21

days

[as

you

catl

it]

from the

date served to submit a challenge to

points

1 thru 4,

and

we

will

be

filing

a

detailed

response Petition,

in

order to

proceed

with

addressing our

general position

of:

there

is

no

authority

in

any

other

Act to subvert the

Supremacy

of the Canada Elections Act.

Part

3: ORDERS

ON

WHICH NO POSITION lS

TAKEN:

The

facts contained

in

the

Aflidavits

are

good

enough tc file

a

factual basis, a legal

basis, and

materials to be relied

on

to contest

our claim

that

no

Act can subvert

the

Act.

As we

see it, no

paper

queen

can

commit

sedition

by

assuming

that

the

BAR must defend this trust

violation,

because there's this

omission

of

an

allegiance

to

preclude you

from obeying orders that

destroy

Canada and the Commonwealth,

in

order

to conform to this

paper queen's

desire to

ignore

an oath taken

on a

plastic

Stone.

l. AS

we see it:

we

are

not contesting the estimated 2-hour timeline

to

settle

this

132-

page

Petition. BECAUSE

we

agree

that our

PROTEST

can be

ruled

on,

in

this time-

frame;

in this

way,

proceed

to

a

date set to appear on this

protest,

contained in

Part

1.


2/13

Jan

15, 2016

RE: Fiie

ilio:

S-

15107

Vancouver

Registry

ln the Supreme

Coutt of British

Columbia

Tl{E

LAW

SOCIETY

OF

BRITISH

COLUMBIA

Petitionen

Marc Pierre

Boyer

Respondent

RESPONSE TO PETITION

Between:

And:

Part

1:

DENIAL

OF CONSENT

TO

grant

orders

set out

in

this

following

PROTEST

in order

to revolve

an

Essential

Element of

Law at

this

first Appearance

UNDER

PROTEST:

This application

was

initiated with

a

letter

from

Mr Kleisinger addressing

a common

law complaint

against

Marc

Boyer dated

July

30, 2015,

[p-3

-Ms

Souvage

Affidavit]

AND

this PETITION

-

S-15197

83

is

filing an

action

against

MARC PIERRE

BOYER, when

the

BAR

is barred from

giving

me

this

straw

man,

because

this lnstitution

knows that creating

this legal

entity

is

directly forbidden

in

Law,

because it's

a

violation

of Sec

336

CC

-

FRAUD

Appendix

A

offers

a

detailed

account of

these abnormalities

of

my abnormal birth

l.

By

definition: the main reason

Marc Boyer

holds

a

criminal record

is

due

to

this

original

violation

of

creating

this

all

capitals

entity.

Frankly,

the

primary

function

for Sec 336

CC

and Sec

337 CC existing

is

because

your

Sumerian

lore warns of

dire consequences,

for violating this trust that

will

lead

to answering the

question

contained

in lCor

4:20

NAMELY:

Does

Authority again

desire on

engaging

the merciless end

of

this civilization

/age

flike

Nineveh

did],

when

challenged by the one with

the abnormal

birth

[of

l

Corl5]

2.

With this Petition, we come

full circle as to why

this

[attached]

gag

order was created

in

the first

place

NAMELY:

This trust was violated

by

Attorney

General

Wally Oppal, in

2004

12005,

who

under Sec

8

CC

Territories Act terminology:

raped me

a of my

private

individual

landed

rights.

Due

to my abnormal birth right, authority

is

directly

forbidden

to create

flet

alone

imprison]

this all capitals entity. THEREFORE,

since the BAR

initiated this action means

i

can now civilly

protest

this act

in

this

proceeding,

in order

to recognize my claim to

the

face

value of my bond, so that

good

first-fruit can occur.

3. This decade

old

gag

order barred

me from

pressing

the inevitability

of

having

to

settle

this case

civilly,

which

resulted

in

your

criminal Code acting like

i

must be assimilated

or destroyed,

on

a

pedantic

assumption that

without

a lawyer

i

did

not know any

better.

This Civil

proceeding

must

address this systemic abuse of my common

law

guarantees

4.

As

we see

4

that's why

this

Petition implies

a

few

times that

just

because

being found

guilty

under

the criminal

Court

jurisdiction,

does

not

necessarily

mean

that

i can

be

assumed to

be

found

guilty

in

this

Civil

proceeding

where ijust

might

get'a

yes'.

ON THIS: I'm certain that

i

have friends in High

places

of authority

that

actually

act

as

if on my side;

othemise

appearances

like

this civil solution would

never have been

pressed.

Therefore,

iihank

all

ihose

yrho

are making

this cjvi court date

possible.

83


3/13

APPENDIX

A:

On

outiining

the impoitance of thls Birth

Staternent /bond iss*e

ON

OUTLINING

SPECIFIC AtsR{ORMALIT ES N MY

ABilIORMAL

E'RTH

STATEMENT,

PREF,ACE:

in

the

attached copy,

i

printed

a back to back copy,

just

like my original etched

short

form,

which

is

part

of a long form regisiry that is

aciually

like how i laid-up

the 2nd

way.

This

original

document

is on acetate film,

the

hand

writing

is

my mother's, done

with

a special

pen,

where

after this document is registered,

is

then

dipped

in

acid, and the

writing

is actually

transparent,

in order

that

no one

can alter or forge

this

document.

ln

99.999% of

the

time,

the

whole

document

is dipped at

the

same

time,

and

a

Red

Seal

is/was

added,

and in this

way

this

baby

became

this

bond

issue

[a

Warehouse

Receipt],

which

gave

the

government

[at

that

time] a million

dollars, in return for

the

bondholder

[UCC

/the

Pope]

to be

entitled to

the

entire earnings

/output

created

by

this

indentured

slave status, for

the

rest of

their

life.

lN MY

CASE,

because my father signed this

commission

resulted where

[in

Jan 1952]

only

the

right

side was dipped

in

acid.

Then, the King died

a

few

weeks

later. AND this

document

was

in

estopple

for

38

years.

The

left side

was cast

in

Jan

1sth,

1

989.

This dipping

was

done

so

that

it's impossible to

forge

or

alter

this

title

document later

1.

On

the filigree

of this Statement /bond:

This

is a

very

ancient way

to

designate

[in

this casel

the

bounty

/wealth

of

the

Commonwealth

that

was

in trust

with

King

George

Vl

[for

his loyal

subjects]

that

were

symbolically

upheld by

the

Stone

of Destiny,

which

is heavily

attached to Sumerian, Christian,

Jewish

and

Celtic

lore. This

Sumerian

twisted

logic

is the foundation

for

Rom

3:

'what

if

we do evil,

so

that

good

can result?'

2.

This

filigree

was

replaced

with

boxes

in

Queen

Elizabeth's reign, because

the

King's

coffers

were

robbed by

this

war

debt,

by being responsible for

the

damages

incurred

by the winning

and losing sides of the war.

Upon his

death,

resulted where

the

Pope

/UCC thru at-large bankers robbed

the

Commonwealth's

trust,

by

fully

implementing

this truly evil

ancient Sumerian

slavery

racket

called:

WAREHOUSE

RECEIPTS.

3.

Because of

my father's commission, my Statement has all kinds of odd markings to

it.

LIKE

: The

solid line that

was

drawn-in

[at

the

top

of

the

right

side,

on

the

front

face].

When

it

was

cast,

it

designated

that this

statement or bond is on

solid

ground.

The

line under

BOYER is also underlined,

meaning

my

father's trust

is on

solid

ground.

4. On this title

document,

my UCC file

# is: 11327O,

and

[on

the

backside] this Ontario

Registry

#

88-361731

was

added

in

1

988,

and

it's

purposely

placed

above

the

Crest.

ION

THIS]

Had

i

said

'yes'to

this

question

of:

'do

you

want a

Birth Certificate', this #

would've

been

directly

under Despina

Georgas'thumb,

just

like my Birth

# 000665

is

directly under the registrais signature. Had ifallen for this same trap of saying

'yes',

[in

Dec.

1988] my bond

would

have been

seized to

pay

the

war

ciebi, because

my

#

88-361731

would

have

been directly

under

this

registrar's

signature. But,

it's

not.

5. Now,

because my

father

had this

trust,

is

why

this

#

is

above the

Queen,

and

this

automatically

created 2

quirks:

(1)

i

did not

get

any Seal,

(2)

this

Special Notice

saying

that this

statement

is not a registration,

[therefore]

it

is a herediiary entitlement.

1.

Now, when

you

look

at

the

BOND lay-up,

This

# 88-361731

is above

this

UCC

#,

r,vhere

the ancient

teim

of:

'being

c. the

-:,oae"

i-.

c'??.

;

b:'"'rc exo.ess:d

h:':


4/13

2. Had i

been

under

Despina's

thumb, this #

would

have been

taken

as a death

certificate

being

issued, by

this

# being

in the

medical

practices

box. But,

it's

not.

1.

This

is

why

it's

a

crime

of

FRAUD to

press

on

me, an all capitals

legal entity.

3. What cannot be mis'taken'

[here]

is

that

this

#

000665 is now

in

the

Seal section,

which

clearly entitles me

to

1-share of the

value

of my King's

Commonwealth

bond.

4.

NOW COMES

THE

BIG

QUIRK:

[because

i

said 'no', resulted with] The

#

37300

being added twice

[in

1989],

and

this

is a

California Law

called:

litle to

property

while

on water.

I did

not

land in

Ontario,

i'm somehow

now landed in

California,

and

my

[inheritance]

is now

this title bond

to

1-share of the

Commonwealth's wealth.

5.

The

adding

of

this

#

37300

marking,

means

everyone who

trampled

on me for the

last

decade

is

guilty

of breaking

this

really ancient

trust.

AND,

10-years later,

i

get

invited to Civilly open this file, where the charge

of FMUD must

be dealt with.

1

.

Today, it's called FRAUD, for

depriving

me

of this title

to

be fairly

treated

under

common law.

-

Sec

340 CC

FRAUD.

Destroying

documents of

titte.

Every

one

who, for

a fraudulent

purpose,

destroys, cancels, conceals

or obliterates

(a)

a

document

of

title to goods or lands, (b)

a

valuable security

or

testamentary

instrument,

or

(c)

a

judicial

or oificial document, is

guilty

of an

indictable offence

and liable to

imprisonment for

a term

not exceeding

ten

years.

[under

absolute

trust

liability

=

guilty]

6.

ON

THIS:

When the

Queen's

registry, defaced

my

Statement

with

this

#37300, in

1989

is

not

fraud;

these abnormalities are

actually

prescribed

by UCC law, and

exceptionally

rare.

1.

lN HINDSIGHT:

This FRAUD originally occurred, when

Wally Oppal

committed the

crime of

the

millennium, by

authorizing

the

BAR

to

commit FRAUD,

in order

to

entrap

me to

get

a PERSON, and that way

this

now 83 file

thick dossier that

was

created, in

2004

l2OO5

could

just

be closed, because somehow

my bond

had been

cashed

in.

2. ln

twisted

UCC logic, it's

as

if

i

did this

ten

year

sentence. Frankly,

most of

the

abuse

that

occurred

in

the

last

decade, had

to

occur,

BUT under respondeat

Superior

some

one must be made accountable

for

this

abuse.

AND

this can be

done,

by

recognizing

that

their

is

a real value to this BOND, at this

first

appearance,

and

proceed

accordingly.

7.

AS WE

SEE lT: This fiduciary

trust

violation

falls

on who

ever

holds

the

Office

of

this

paper

Queen

of

Canada;

[since

the

Charter]

the

trust

is now on Marc

Mayrand,

and

he is also holding

the Canadian

BAR's

trust

account. AND

if i'm

wrong

ihen,

the

Crown is duty bound

to

press

[who

ever

holds this trust]

to

appear at

the first

appearance, or at

least

make

themselves

be known who

they

are

For

the

record]

lN

CONCLUSION:

What should

be noted is THAT: the abnormalities

on my

statement

are

[by intent]

extremely

rare, because there's

this

big red seal

that

hides

this

UCC

bond

number.

AND,

because She violated this

ancient trust means:

We

are entitled to

seize

Her certificates.

1. Frankly, there

were

so few

such bonds issued

in

the

first

place,

and there

were

so

many traps to

get

thru

-

THIS

MEANS

THAT: 64

years

after

this

bond

issue

was

closed

that

we

can

claim

to

hold

the

only real bearer

share

left, and

this means that:

the

UCC,

or

the

Crown, or

the

BAR

are now

placed

with

the

onus

to

prove

otherwise. AND

1.

Frankly,

the one

responsible

for

holding

this

information

is Marc Mayrand,

and his

clerk

lves

Cote, who

happen to be attached to

this

Petition from

the

BAR.

2. Mr. Buhler is representing

their

interests in this court,

and

under Sec 337 CC, they

must deliver

this

information

/statistic,

at

this 1"'

appearance. Act accordingly.


5/13

BACK

TO

THE

IMPORTANCE

OF

LIFTING

THIS DECADE OLO GAG

ORDER

7.

This

gag

order

came from me

filing a

motion

in response

to

getting

the minutes

of

the

meeting

where

the

BC BAR converted their oath

of allegiance to this new

Barristers and Solicitors

oath

of

1993. This

gag

order enforces that

Marc

Boyer

cannot

use

this secret

in

order to

submit any

court document

without

a

lawyer filing

this motion,

in

order

words the BAR

is

compelled

to bar

anyone who

will

make

a

common law defence using especially

a'Free

and democratic society'

[R

v

Oakes]

in

any

proceeding,

because

at

face value, lawyers

are directly

prohibited

to

do so,

therefore

no

one else can defend common

law

in

any

proceeding,

under Sec

126(2) CC

8.

As

we

understand

this

conflict

in law,

the

Federal

Courts thru the

BAR are

pressing

that:

in

order to

comply

with

an implied

necessary

requirement of

having

NAFTA

passed,

means

we

Canadians

have been

governed

under the

North

American Free

Trade

Agreement Agreement,

[NAFTA

agreement]

where

lawyers

are agreeing

to serve the Federal Courts

as Supreme

9.

In

the minutes

of this

meeting

it

stated

that

with

just

a show of

hands,

the

vote

passed.

BUT,

it was duly

noted

in

the minutes

by

some

benchers that this

new oath would inevitably

lead

to

a

serious conflict between this

new oath

of

the

Bar and the oath of the

Office

[of

these

benchersl,

because

of

the

inevitable conflicts

that could occur from

serving two masters.

10.

This conflict

between the oath

to

the

BAR and the oath of Office

of

the

benchers has come to

full festering

fruition, under this

SCC unanimous

Smith

ruling, because

this

conflict

in

law

has

created

this elephant to enter

the

room and

nobody

in

authority

wants to

address

this conflict

in law

-

NAMELY:

According to the

SCC

-

it's

actually

legal to

grow

cannabis

for

dispensaries

that service

the

needs

of the vulnerable

in

society,

'I

l.

Frankly until

this conflict in law

is

settled

civilly can only

lead

to this fact

that

when

/if

a unanimous

decision

like

this

SCC

ruling

can be ignored

by everyone

in

Maritime

Authority,

means

all

Canadians

right to

Sovereignty

have been

trashed

by

lawyers

and

police

and

uncivil servants

by

this

oath to obey the

Federal

Court

as

Supreme

-

except

these

BAR

members

called benchers,

who are bound

to

obey

the SCC

as Supreme.

12. In

our

case. the

independence

of these

benchers is being

hollowed out

by

having the

Crown

be

able

to

block any of our

common

law

application

of

law

from being

filed,

because

of this

gag

order, which

is now being compounded

with this Court

Motion.

13.

BoTTOM

LINE:

There is

one

big difference

between

when this systematic

plan

to

gradually

become

part

of

their

New

World order was

set, and today

NAMELY:

Those

who

govern

are now

held

to

having to

explain

why they're

doing this.

14.

In

true

Biblical

proportions:

as to the

2"d

Commandment

-

The sins

of the

father

are

being

held by the

son,

and

this court

ruling

is

literally

deciding

whether

the

BAR

and

those who

govern

want to

go

to a

Wedding by recognizing

that:

the

Supremacy

of

common

law

is

in fact

the founding principles

of

God's

law

being

Suprenre, and

a

Banquet

was offered

to

everyone

else

and

frankly

i

take comfort

in observing

that the

Bible

did not lie,

because

exactly

as

to

prophecy

no

one

is lifting

finger

to help.

15.

EITHER

WAY: Exactly

as

to R v

Oakes

-

This

decision

is

the culmination

of

a

truly

demonic

sinister

plan

despite

its

effect

to

be

reasonable

and demonstrably

iustified

[or]

the

Genesis

for

returning

the

rights

and freedoms

guaranteed

in the Chartei

l.

THEREFORE:

we wait in

patient

anticipation

for

the inevitable

and

irrevocable

consequences

that

will

arise

from

'a

yes'or

no

decision

on

this charge

by the BAR.

51


6/13

.i

.i.

-i

t.-f

i

Novdnih'er-27,'2ofs

1.,.;.-

.*13

,

Qac-k,

in

0O{;'Marc

Boyer

was

served a

gag

order

by

the head registrar

of

the Civil Registry

-.

''

-'

.

called

Mr. Messenger

This

gag

order came

from

filing one document

that he

called

t,exatious,

-

".-

dnd

oiibihallt'

his

gag

order

only

applied to

the

civil registry

and it now applies

to

the criminal

registry

as

well, because i

keep

bringing

up

the thomy

issue

that this

court

now faces again.

Except now

it's far

worse

than

when

i

started, and

it

can never get better without someone like

me

going

the distance

in spite

of the huge

obstacles,

because if i don't, then

who will?

2.

ln this new case, the BAR

now

wants to

stop

me

frcm

acting like a lawyer

in a

criminal

matte(

when l'm acting

like a barrister,

who is defending the issue of

no

jurisdiction

at

the arraignment.

ION

THIS]: Criminal

charges

are not

a

criminal matter

until

after the

arraignment.

'1.

At

face

value:

With

this common law motion filed

by the BAR, we

have done

a full

circle;

by

this

i mean, we're

back

to the

original reason

for this decade old

gag

order,

except

worse;

where the

BAR

wants exclusivity to represent

anyone in any

phase

of

a

court

proceeding,

in order

to

bar

anyone

like

me

from

making a common

law

defence because

i

know

and

act on benefiting

from

the

Achilles

heal

that the minutes

of

this vote exposed.

3.

The

larger issue

at

stake in

this

case

is

that

after

22

yea|s of every one associated

with

the

BAR

[ike]

law enforcemenl

officers

are

prohibited

from

being

a common

law

Peace Officer and

every

lawyer has been

prohibited

from

defending any

common

law application

in a

criminal

matter, which

has resulted where

all Canadian common law

rights and Freedoms

have been

systematically

gutted

by lawyers

[in

1993]

and enforced

under under

Civilian Oversight

[1998]

4.

[at

face

value]

lN

THIS CASE,

of relying on the mountain

of statutory limitation

placed

on our

Free

and Democratic society

[under

R

v Oakes] means

the fact remains

that when no one can

defend

common

laq results

where

the

BAR is entrenched

on destroying democratic

freedom

by

insisting that

theiiAct

supersedes

the Act,

which

plays

hand in hand with

NATO

passing

/

implementing

this

sedition

Act called

S-55

of the CDSA,

which

lby

virtue

of

the

fact

that

it came

from

Royal ascentl,

results

where all BAR member can

actually

engage

in

vanquishing

all its

disadvantaged

Canadians

by

causing

the

total decimation

of all

human rights

known

to man,

because

a

faceless paper queen called governor

in

council said

so.

But

then

Pierre

Trudeau

called our

present

culmination

of this

grand

plan:

"A

short

te

rm

pain

for a

long

term

gain,'

5. lf anyone

cares

to

take

note:

Under s-2 of S 55

of

the

CDSA all Public

Safety will be handed

over

to

NATO under anotherAct

tabled this

time

by

Justin

Trudeau,

with his majority will

pass

the full implementation

of

this seditious act of omission

in

the next Throne

Speach,

[note:

s-2,1]

"without

restricting

the

generality

ofthe foregoing"

Afterthis,

NATO

Federal Courtscan

now

tell Parliament

that

it

holds sole 'across

the board'

jurisdiction

over Public Safety

in

Canada.

1. So

the

cast

is

set,

so

this

new Zionist loving Prime Minister

[at

face value]

can

take that

giant

step of totally abandoning

our Sovereignty over

to NATO

is almosi

a

fail accomplie;

2. EXCEPT FOR THE

FACT

THAT:

Constitutional law under the

SCC is still Supreme

in

Canada, and

a bencher

flike

i'm facing

in

this

BA.R

chargel

is

cdught

in

a

trap

of

serving

two

masters, and must make a

choice.

NAMELY:

Will

this.iudge rebel

by

submitting to this

sedition

[OR]

will

the BCSC benchers rebel and side

with the

SCC as being Supreme?

6.

Frankly,

all

we can do

is

place

our

faith

in

God,

because

the fate

of men

in

Canada becoming

a

banana

republic

in

their

demonic

New

World Order is

held

by

two or three

witnesses, in an

insignificant

side

ruling in

a

case where

the

messenger

will

either be denied the

right

to uphold

the law as Supreme

in

order

to

protect

the fiduciary trust to Canadian

Sovereignty as Supreme.

1.

SOMAKEACHOIGE:

Aswe

understand

it,

this bencher will

either obey

a

Sec 126(2) CC

interference

by

the

new

Attorney

General

or

the conscience of the Minister

of

Justice,

and

this choice is held

by

this new

player

on the scene,

NAMELY:

Jody Wilson

Rayborn

.\'::'

')

i

:,'

11

lr', 1,...

,l],j

MOTION

ON REPEALING

MARC

BOYER'S

616

gPPg(;J.:

:.

-=,'.:

:ir


7/13

LLle

Cpp

ru

\(J. r

riat()irl

vt.\col vEIl

R[cts

i]r,

i-

-ii,'PIlE\l8

COURT OF

BRlTISH

COLL\{BI.\

}I.UIC

BOYER

'II{E

C.{\DID.{TL

PETTf IO\ i:R

.{\ D:

C}Iffi F

COXST)SLE CRdIi,,\}.{

RESPONDL\I'

BIIORE TI iT

HO\OLIr.{ELE

CI{ITT

JIJSTICI I]RE\\IR

)6,8o$'n

;r,i;

[,r

or

uey. 2oo5

U.i{lVi'lii

Ri:f

f

liji-\L

Of:

.i REGISTI{:\R

pu:suent

to Rule i {li) oith* Rqles

ci'Coun,

THiS

COTRi

OR-DE,I(S

TIL.\T:

l.

fl:xc

lloyer

is

prohibired

fior: con:rnencing

cr

ccntinuing

any

pr,-.ceedings with

drj.s

cour- exccirt

i:

r:nresente'J bv

e

solicitor.

'flie

Regisrar

shall

oroviCed

aotiiication

of this orCer b1- regrilar rnail io i{arc Boye, a.

f

jlLj

f.

rrrl,

Si.

\',rnuourcr

BC,

r'.f

t

UZ.

4{

3. Illrc

Boyer is

granlrd

ieav€ to file an application to vary or rescintl

this

order

rvithin

?

C;r;s

:i:m

rrr:i;nu

cfthi. crdcr.

ENTERED

MnY

1

:t

?0i15

VAN:OUVER

REgI:-TRY

vitrd?.t:rcLg,.'


8/13

Jan

15,2016

Between:

And:

RE: File

No:

S- 15107

as

Vancouver Registry

Petitioner

Respondent

AFFIDAVIT

TO

SUPPORT

MYABNORMAL

BIRTH

ln

World War 2,

my

father

was

a

Lieutenant at Camp Petewawa. When the war ended

[1945],

he

knew that Canada

was

going

to implement this same

Birth

Certificate like England had, and being

an accountant, knew the

importance

of

these entitlement articles

given

to Officers that allowed

them to declare

him and his descendants

to

not be obligated to repay

this

war

debt, and signed

it

as

his

departing

trust /commission upon being

released. Two

years

later,

[1947]

Canada created

The Vital Statistics Act that

implemented this Birth

Statement

/Birth Certificate

protocol.

I

was born in Dec 20,1951

and

the

King died on

Feb

6,1952.

On

Jan7, 1952

this Ontario Offlce

registered

my birth

as

the 665h entry

of

that

year,

and this

#

000665 is

etched

in black

[not

red

ink like

everyone

elsel My Birth Statement

was not immediately

[and

never was]

processed

into

a

Queen's

Birth

Certificate.

Because

of my father's commission, my Statement sat on a shelf for

38

years,

which

means

i

obeyed my fathers death

bed order

to do

my

best to not

get

a

Birth

Certificate, because

iwas

not a million

dollar

baby

[Warehouse

Receipt],

iwas

priceless.

My

father

died on

my

13ih

birthday of cancer.

The whole family was

there

to

witness

the

death

rattle and i could

not

take

the mourning that happened, so

i

left the room and went across the

hall

to the chapel

on

this

hospice ward

to

pray.

I

has

visited

by an angel floating in

a

cloud /aura that

looked

just

like

my father except

healthy. He

told

me

he

was my

guardian

angel, because

i

was

predestined

to

be

a

soldier for Christ, and to

obey

him

when

he interceded.

Ithen

got

a Social

Security Card,

when

this

# was

prohibited

from being

used as any

form

of lD.

Then, in 1984, Mulroney

passed

a

law

saying

that all SSC cards would

be

converted to a

SIN

and

it

would now be

my new lD # under the Charter.

At that

time,

i

got

my

first clear order from this

angel

to

leave

the country, because if

i

was not in Canada on Jan

1"t,

1985 meant

that they could

not convert this card

into

a SIN

card.

So

i

originally

went

to

Florida where

i

enjoyed

a

good

life,

ln November 1988,

i

applied for a Passport

at

the Canadian

Consulate

in

Los

Angeles

[file

# 88-

3617311.

A

few weeks later,

i

was called

into this office, where they

asked

me

to change

a

'no' to

a'yes'to

thisquestion: Do

you

want

a

Bifth

Ceftificate?

Atthetimeiasked

if

this

question

would

be asked if

iwas

in Canada,

and

they said

'no'.

I

then asked

if

this was a landed

issue?

They

said

'yes',

and

I

asked them, does

that

mean

i

get

to

choose?

She said

yes,

and

this

meeting

was

in

order

to

make

sure

that i

understood

the

question,

because it's highly

unusual

to

check

'no'.

At this

point,

i

told this Consular General

that

i made

this

'no'

choice,

because my father had

made

it

clear

to never

be

the

property

of this

paper

queen,

if

i

could avoid

it,

and they accepted

it.

A few weeks later in the mail, i

got

a

Passport and this defaced Birth

Statement,

and that night,

my son MarcAnthony Boyer

was

conceived.

We left for

Brazil shortly there after, because there

was

a

ban

on

flying such a long

distance, after the

first

trimester, and because

i

was warned by

close

friends that there

were these highly suspicious

men in black

looking

for

me.

We returned to

Florida, when my son

was

about

5 months old,

and we started

a

foreign

owned

small business,

and

iquasi-legally

worked for her.

[i

owe no taxes,

so says the lRS, when

iwas

deported

in

2008]

ln the Supreme Court

of

British

Columbia

THE LAW SOCIETY

OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Marc

Pierre Boyer

L

4.

5.

6.


9/13

7. ln

1996,

she divorced me

shortly

and

after being

diagnosed

with

lymphoma,

i returned

to canada

This angel

told

me

to

go

to Bc,

where

iwould

be

needed

later.

on

Nov

13,

1gg9,

i crossed

the

border,

and i

then

got

my

flrst

and

only flu-shot,

which

kicked

my

lymphoma

into

full

gear.

On

the evening

of

9/1'1,

i had

a

very

lucid

dream,

where

i

was

told

the

recipe

to make

my

remarcable

Soma cookies,

in order

to

cure my

ever

increasing

cancer

pains,

and

to

run

with

it.

8.

At that

time,

i made myself

a royal

pain

at City Hall, in order

to

have

my

landed

on

land

in

Canada

status

be

established, and

to

pursue

a

common law

defence,

under

the Marijuana

party.

I

was

eventually charged

for

protesting

too

aggressively

at

City

Hall

in

Jan

Srh,2004, and

then

in Sept

28th,2004,

for

operating a

commercial

premise

known as the

Vancouver

East

Marijuana

party

Headquarters,

where

at

the Arraignment

in

November 1Orh

2004,

i

got

the

charges

dropped, and i

was

to

appear in

a

week

to file for

damages, because

i

filed

this

17-page

article

entitled

NOTICE

OF DENIAL

OF CONSENTTO

BE GOVERNED,

and

that

evening

my

chest

plate

was

snapped in

2, by two

VPD

duty

Sargents,

and

that

morning i

died, and

had

a

face

to

face

contact

with

this

angel

[as

if

in

a

white

cloud]

that i met

when

iwas

13

[on

this]

my

father was

54,

and

i was

now

54, and this angel looked

just

like

me;

At

the

end of

this

meeting,

i was

swallowed

by

the

heart of

the

earth,

[for

lack of any other

term

to

explain it]

and

returned

with

this

partial

mended

broken

chest

plate.

A few days later,

I

went to VGH,

where

i

got

X-rays

that

showed

the

fracture

was real.

SIDE BAR lin

hindsight] this event signalled Daniel 8:14, because

2300 mornings

later,

the

tidal

wave

that struck Fukushima

hit,

where

lfor

at

Ieast

a week

before] i

clearly

warned

authority

with

a Get

Well

Soon card that

something

big

was

about

to happen

on

that day.

1.

I reported this broken chest

incident

at my next court

appearance,

and as

to

instructions

given

at

this

1st arraignment,

i boldly filed

this

priceless gift

from

God

/damage

award

that

is

actually

still

a default

judgment,

yet

swept away and

destroyed

by Wally

Oppal.

[Sec

340

FRAUD].

9. I then

filed

a legal

paper

trap

with Revenue

Canada-,

which

gave

me

a

great

civil

defence

that took

.

4 months

to set-up, i filed

a Petition

to

have this

criminal

case file

dealt

with

civilly.

.Eollowing

this

1"r appearance

[where

i

got

what

i

call

my court

victory]

i was

slapped with

this

gag

order.'

10.

At this criminal

trial

[on

this Party

Headquarters

charges]

a

miraculous

twist

in

fate

happened,

where

my sentence

was

read the

day after

the

Election

writ

dropped,

and

point

7 now

made

an

erroneous

claim

that i was

mis'taken'

to

believe that

the

Elections

Act offered

me

any immunity.

1.

ON THIS:

Wthout

this

quirk,

i could

never have a

chance

to

add

a trust

challenge

[by

means

of

a

caveat

to

my candidacyl

that

caused JP Kingsley,

his

Clerk, and

the Chief

Justice

to

resign

in late December

2005,

over a flduciary

trust

violation

that

i set

up

in

this

trap

/caveat.

11.

I

rekindled

the

issue

of

getting

the

$1000.

deposit returned

this spring,

for

the

2004/05

election.

and in order

to

comply

with

their

prescribed

paperwork,

i

filed all

the

proper

articles

to

get

this

deposit

back.

The flle

was

cleared

for

payment

after

being scrutinized,

and

filed

on

time

by our

Party's

auditor.

As

to

Elections Canada's original estimate, we

should have

received

this

check,

before

the

new

election

campaign

started. They

knew

that iwas

going

to

court

with

or

without

this

check,

and

since

Mr Buhler

has added

this case

that

involves

lves

coie,

actually

means,

i

can

have

this

court

rule

on

ihis

check,

because

we

see

it

as

an

essential

element

inihis

Civil

Claim.

AFFIRMED

BEFORE

ME at Vancouver,

)

British

Columbia,

on

'-hnr.r;rnr

t1i

.?{rtt-

)

, iriii:

",r,,r,,i;,r1,),t,rIfnrii,liir,ljr.rirrl,,i,l

-iil

i

Lr,iriil

aiJ, ri,i

Marc

Pierre Boyer

i"l(,r.ir1[,ir'.I

(tr.iinr|ii,::

it"',':1'3

r-

i

i'

;:"

i]"

:-ri'':rr'l


10/13

THIS FOOTNOTE

does

not

fit

the

format

of

an Affidavit

BUT

it

is

submitted

as the

truth:

1.

As we

see ft; l've

limited

the

legal case law information

in

this Affidavit

to

basically

the

original

root case file

that

caused the original

gag

order.

Everything

between

then

and now is still viewed

by

me

as

just

one

count of

a

breach of fiduciary

trust.

The

$1

000. deposit is an essential element,

in connecting all

of

the

liability created across

a decade, because it

can

be used as

an

lnstrument

to dispense

my bond

value,

which

by itself, is designed

to

redeem

all

debt in

the world. I

prey

for

'tribulation

good',

because

the

alternative is

irrevocable.

lt's

not my

choice

what

authority decides,

i

simply cannot shrink

from

pressing for

the

impossible, because

the

impossible is inevitable.

2.

The

origins

of

this

Birth Statement

and its

wicked

cousin

the

Birth Certificate

were

originally

created

in

Sumer

/Nineveh.

The use of these

forms

were

mentioned in

Exodus

1 : 8

thru

1 1

,

where the

new

king knew nothing about

Joseph,

and brought

in the slave

masters

to

oppress

them, AND 430

years

later Moses crossed

the

Nile

to

liberate lsrael from these slavery bonds.

3.

As

to

Galatians 2:17,

i'm

justAbraham's

seed,

and my abnormal birth landed in 1989

[430

years

after the

Act

of

the

Supremacy of God

-15591,

and

Abraham's

trust

is

being augmented

from

being

'of

God'to

being'with God'.

This NOTION changes

everything,

and

it

prepares

the

way

to

orderly

inherit

the

earth;

where

by upholding God's

creation,

we

share in

the

burden, and in this

way we

share

in

the

glory,

which

signals

the

return of

the

Sons of

the

Living God,

who

liberate

the

creation

itself

from

its bondage

to

decay, and

in

this

way we witness a new creation,

[Rom

8:18on]

4.

As we

see ft.'

The

firm

roots of

this

New

World Order

was

implemented 3-years after

'the

Act',

when in

1563, the

Act

of Supremacy

of

Parliament

was implemented:

Jefferson actually

called

this

Act

'the

original

depafture of

principle'

-

and

[also]

as to this Galatians

prophecy

timeline of

430

years

later,

lin

1993]

NAFTAwas

voted in, and that could only occur with

the

oath to

the

BAR

being converted, and

exactly as

to

prophecy,

it can never

get

better

without

rejecting

the

basic

foundation

of

an entire social structure

called

law and order

that

is

based

on

the

love

of

money.

1 . To my knowledge, JP

Kingsley held

the

trust, and

pressed

a

yes

vote on this

new

oath

change

AND again,

there

is this connection

with

this

case file and Marc Mayrand

/lves

Cote's trust,

because

the

check

that

Elections Canada

hand us settles an account on JP Kinsley's watch.

5.

Romans

9:

23on mentions

the

riches

of this damage award

[as

a, what

ifl,

then

my

abnormal

Birth

Statements fits

the

next

riddle:

it refers

to

my

people

not

being my

people

[37300

-

i'm now

landed on

water

in

Californial

and

my mother being this

#

37300

[where

i hold some Title to

property

while on

waterl

and the

very

event

where

i

said'you

are not my

people'did

occur at an

arraignment

hearing before Judge

Kitchen,

where i was

referring

to

a row of

vested

rabbis

that

appeared as

witness at

this

bail

hearing.

[i

ordered transcripts, so it's on

record]

As

to

Rom 10,

i'm

pressing

this offer

on a

people

who

are

not a nation, and for

the

past

10

years

i've been

relentless

at

making offers

to

a disobedient

and obstinate

people.

Romans

11

refers to

this

spirit

of stupor

being lifted

[metanoia

/grand

awakening];

it then

refers

to

good

first

fruit,

and

your

destiny

is

eventually

based on

how

you

handle

this

trap

/stumbling

block created

by'the

one'.

6.

Think

about

it,

there can't be bad first

fruit,

until good first

fruit

has been rejected, once

too

often.

lf every last curse

of Revelation or Ezekiel

or all those

prophets

of

doom

must be fulfilled, then

Jesus Christ died

for

nothing.

las

to

Ephesians

6:101 We're supposed

fo vesl

ourse/ves

with this

breast

plate

of

ighteousness.

This baftle is

not

on flesh

and blood,

but

against the

dark

forces

of

this

world.

Good first

fruit

liberates

the evil in

those

who

otherwise remain the evil ones

that

God

liberates

/saves

all

the

meek from. Either

way,

the

meek inherit

the earth.

I

prey

for

good

first fruit.


11/13


12/13


13/13

8&'-

3a/73/

_----*

,,('

0{}0s65

Documents

Original Petition Affidavit