Upload
magdalen-booker
View
220
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Osamu Hashimoto
Department of PhysicsTohoku University
APCTP Workshop on Strangeness Nuclear Physics (SNP'99)
February 19-22, 1999
Reaction spectroscopy of hypernuclei
(1) Introduction(2) The hypernuclear spectroscopy(3) Mass dependence of binding energy(4) Light hypernuclear spectra
12C, 16
O,13C, 9
Be, 7Li, 10
B(5) Future prospect and summary
Seoul National University
Osamu Hashimoto
Department of PhysicsTohoku University
APCTP Workshop on Strangeness Nuclear Physics (SNP'99)
February 19-22, 1999
Reaction spectroscopy of hypernuclei
(1) Introduction(2) The hypernuclear spectroscopy(3) Light hypernuclear spectra
12C, 16
O,13C, 9
Be, 7Li, 10
B(4) Future prospect and summary
Seoul National University
n or p
n
p
B
Bp
Bn
208Pb
207Tl
207Pb
Weak decay nonmesonic mesonic
Narrow widths< a few 100 keVLikar,Rosina,PovhBando, Motoba, Yamamoto
Excited states of hypernuclei
hypernuclear spectroscopy
• Narrow widths of nucleon-hole -particle states
– less than a few 100 keV• N interaction weaker than NN
• N spin-spin interaction weak
• isospin = 0
• No exchange term
• A hyperon free from the Pauli exclusion principle
• Smaller perturbation to the core nuclear system
hypernuclear structurevs.
N interaction
Precision spectroscopy required
S=-1 hyperon production reactionsfor hypernuclear spectroscopy
Z = 0 Z = -1 commentneutron to proton to
(+,K+) (-,K0) stretched, high spin
in-flight (K-,-) in-flight (K-,0) substitutional at low momentum
stopped (K-,-) stopped (K-,0) large yield, via atomic states
virtual (,K)
spin flip, unnatural parity
(p,p’K0) (p,p’K+) virtual (,K)
(p,K+) (p,K0) very large momentum transfer
(e,e’K0) (e,e’K+)
(+,K)
Cross section vs. momentum transferfor some hypernuclear production reactions
Stopped (K-,)
(,K)
(p,K)
Inflight(K-,)
Hy p
ernu
c le a
r C
r oss
sec
tio n
Momentum transfer (MeV/c)
mb/sr
nb/sr
b/sr
0 500 1000
The (+,K+) spectroscopy
• Large momentum transfer– angular momentum stretched states are
favorably populated
– neutron-hole -particle states are excited
• Higher pion beam intensity compensates lower cross sections
– 10 b/sr for (+,K+) vs 1 mb/sr for (K-,-)
• Pion beams are cleaner than kaon beams
• 1 GeV/c pion beam is required
For the spectroscopy a good resolution beam spectrometer
and a good-resolution and large-solid angle spectrometer
The SKS spectrometer
• Good energy resolution --- 2 MeV FWHM• Large solid angle --- 100 msr
– about 60 % of 12C ground state yield
• Short flight path --- 5 m– 40 % kaon survival rate
• Efficient kaon identification
Optimized for the (+,K+) spectroscopy
Large superconducting dipoleat KEK 12 GeV PS
The performance of the SKS spectrometer was demonstrated by the 12
C excitation spectrum
• Large momentum transfer
• Higher pion beam intensity compensates lower cross sections
• Pion beams are cleaner than kaon beams
• 1 GeV/c pion beam is required
Characteristics
The (+,K+) experiments with the SKS spectrometer
• E140a (Hashimoto, Tohoku)
– Systematic spectroscopy of hypernuclei
• E278 (Kishimoto, Osaka)
– Nonmesonic weak decay of polarized 5He
• E307 (Bhang, Seoul)
– Lifetimes and weak decay widths of light and medium-heavy hypernuclei
• E336 (Hashimoto,Tohoku)
– Spectroscopic investigation of light hypernuclei
• E369 (Nagae,KEK)
– Spectroscopy of 89Y
• E419 (Tamura,Tohoku)
– Gamma ray spectroscopy of 7Li
Weak decay of 209Bi Outa
hypernuclei by the (+,K+) reaction Noumi
Absolute energy scale
MHY-MA = -B + Bn - Mn+M
MHY ~ p/ -pK/K
(1) MHY adjusted so that B(12
C) = 10.8 MeV
(2) Energy loss corrected for + and K+ in the target
±0.1 MeV + B(12C)
Binding energies of 7Li, 9
Be ground states are
consistent with the emulsion data well within ±0.5 MeV.
Heavy hypernuclei
• Three heavy targets with neutron closed shells
8939Y50 g9/2 closed 2.2 MeV
1.7 MeV139
57La82 h11/2 closed 2.3 MeV
20882Pb126 i13/2 closed 2.2 MeV
Background as low as 0.01 b/sr/MeV
The binding energies are not strongly dependent on the assumption
KEK PS E140aKEK PS E369
Hypernuclear mass dependence of -hyperon binding energies was derived with different assumptions
La & Pb Spectra
Background level in heavy spectra
Fitting by assuming ….
binding energies
Heavy hypernuclear spectrasmoother than those of DWIA calculation
•Spreading of highest l neutron-hole states of the core nucleus
•Contribution of deeper neutron hole states of the core nucleus
•Other reaction processes not taken into account in the shell-model + DWIA calculation.
•Larger ls splitting ? E369 Nagae
Light hypernuclei
• Playground for investigating hypernuclear structure and LN interaction
• Recent progress in shell-model calculations and cluster-model calculations prompt us to relate the structure information and interaction, particularly spin-dependent part.
E336 Summary
Pion beam : 3 x 106/1012ppp at 1.05 GeV/c
Spectrometer : SKS improved from E140a Better tracking capability with new drift chambers
Targets :7Li 1.5 g/cm2(99%,Metal) 440 G+
9Be 1.85 g/cm2(metal) 434 G+
13C 1.5 g/cm2(99% enriched,powder) 362 G+
16O 1.5 g/cm2(water) 593 G+
12C 1.8 g/cm2(graphite) 313 G+
Absolute energy scale +- 0.1 MeV at B(12
C ) = 10.8 MeV examined by 7
Li, 9Be
Momentum scale linearity +- 0.06 MeV/c
Energy resolution(FWHM) 2.0 MeV for 12C
1.5 MeV
High quality spectra 2 MeV resolution and good statistics
Absolute cross section and angular distribution
Pion beam : 3 x 106/1012ppp at 1.05 GeV/cYield rate : 5 - 8 events/g/cm2/109 pions for 12
Cgr
( ~ 5 - 800 events/day )
E140a 10B, 12C, 28Si, 89Y, 139La, 208Pb
2 MeV resolution, heavy hypernucleiE336 7Li, 9Be, 12C, 13C, 16O
high statistics, angular distributionabsolute cross section
E369 12C, 89Ybest resolution(1.5 MeV), high statistics
Absolute energy scale +- 0.1 MeV at B(12
C ) = 10.8 MeV examined by 7
Li, 9Be
Momentum scale linearity +- 0.06 MeV/c
Energy resolution(FWHM) 2.0 MeV for 12C
1.5 MeV
Summary of hypernuclear spectra obtained with the SKS spectrometer
12C
• The (13-) state at 6.9 MeV is located higher than the
corresponding 12C excited state.
• The nature of the state is under discussion– N spin-spin interaction
– Mixing of other negative parity states
• The width of the p-orbital is peak broader– consistent with ls splitting
E140a spectrum
E336 spectrum --- 5-10 times better statistics consistent with E140a spectrum
Example of a good resolution spectroscopyCore-excited states clearly observed
Phys. Rev. Lett. 53(‘94)1245
Peak # E140a E336(Preliminary) Ex(MeV) Ex(MeV) Cross section(20-140)(b)#1(11
-) 0 0 MeV 1.47 ± 0.05#2(12
-) 2.58 ± 0.17 2.71 ± 0.13 0.23 ± 0.03#3(13
-) 6.05 ± 0.18 0.22 ± 0.03#3’ 8.10 ± 0.38 0.17 ± 0.03#4(2+) 10.68 ± 0.12 10.97 ± 0.05 1.76 ± 0.07
Angular distributions and absolute cross sections
Intershell mixing --- positive parity stateMotoba, Millener, Gal
6.89 ± 0.42
Statistical errors only
11C vs 12C
6.48
4.80
4.32
2.00
0.00
7/2-
3/2-2
5/2-
1/2-
3/2-1
6.905/2+
6.341/2+
0.00
2.71
6.05
8.10
10.97
11C 12C
1-1
(1-2)
(1-3)
(2+)?
2+11C x s11C x p
MeV
MeV
Hypernuclear spin-orbit splitting
• Very small ----- widely believed VSO = 2±1MeV
– CERN data Comparison of 12C, 16
O spectra
• E(p3/2-p1/2) < 0.3 MeV
– BNL data Angular distribution of 13C (K-,-) 13C
• E (p3/2-p1/2) = 0.36 +- 0.3MeV
• Larger splitting ? ----- recent analysis– 16
O emulsion data analysis ( Dalitz, Davis, Motoba)
• E(p3/2-p1/2) ~ E(2+) - E(0+) = 1.56 ± 0.09 MeV
– SKS(+,K+) data new 89Y spectrum (Nagae)
• > 2 times greater ?
“Puzzle”
Comparison of (K-,) and (+,K+) spectraprovides information the splitting
High quality spectra required
16O
11- : p1/2
-1 x s1/2
12- : p3/2
-1 x s1/2
21+ : p1/2
-1 x p3/2
01+ : p1/2
-1 x p1/2
In-flight (K-,-) CERN01
+ populated
Stopped (K-,-) 21
+ and 01+ populated
★ SKY at KEK-PS★ Emulsion new analysis Dalitz et.al. K- + 16O → - + p + 15
N E(21
+) - E(01+) = 1.56 ± 0.09 MeV ?
(+,K+) SKS4 distinct peaks21
+ populated
ls partner
13C
#1 [12C(0+,0) x s1/2]1/21+ 0
#2 [12C(2+,0) x s1/2]3/2+ 4.87 ± 0.09
#3 [12C(0+,0) x p3/2]3/2- 9.63 ± 0.24 ± 0.5*
#4 [12C(1+,0) x s1/2]1/22+ 11.58 ± 0.20 ± 0.5*
[12C(1+,1) x s1/2]1/24+
#5 [12C(2+,0) x p1/2]5/22- 15.43 ± 0.08
[12C(2+,1) x s1/2]3/24+
★ p1/2 → s1/2 observed by the (K-,-) reaction
E(p1/2) = 10.95 ±0.1±0.2 MeV
M. May et.al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78(1997)★ p3/2,1/2 → s1/2 ray measurement Kishimoto 98 at BNL
★ The (+,K+) reaction excites the p3/2 state
[12C(1+) x s1/2]1/2+ near the 3/2- peak
[12C(0+) x p3/2]3/2-
[12C(0+) x p1/2]1/2-ls partner
*A systematical error considering possible contamination from the #4(1/22
+) peak is quoted.
Peak # configuration Ex(MeV)[12C(Jc
,Tc) x lj]Jn
E = E(p1/2) - E(p1/2) = 1.32 ± 0.26 ± 0.7 MeV
9Be
★ microscopic three-cluster modelYamada et.al.
9Be = + x +
x = ** = 3N + N
★ supersymmetric states Gal et.al. genuine hypernuclear states Bando et.al.
(+) x p 1-,3-,...
Cluster excitation taken into account
★ microscopic variational method with all the rearrangement channels
Kamimura, Hiyama
A typical cluster hypernucleus
The present spectrum compared with Yamada’s calculation
BNL spectrum
(1) The genuinely hypernuclear states,1-, 3- identified(2) Higher excitation region shows structure not consistent with the calculated spectrum
7Li
+ d + 3He + t + 5
He + p + n
Cluster model approach
Shell model approach Richter et.al.
Bando et.al.Kamimura,Hiyama
T=1 states around B = 0 MeVstrength observed
Ground : [6Li(1+) x s1/2] 1/2+
First excited : [6Li(3+) x s1/2] 5/2+
E2 transition 5/2+ →1/2+ : 2.03 MeV
What did we learn from MeV hypernuclear reaction spectroscopy ?
• Improvement of the resolution, even if it is small, has a great value– 3 MeV → 2 MeV → 1.5 MeV
• Hypernuclear yield rate plays a crucial role– feasibility of experiments
– expandability to coincidence experiments
• hypernuclear weak decay
• gamma ray spectroscopy
Future prospect
• From MeV to sub-MeV with high efficiency
• Wide variety of reactions– angular momentum transfer
– spin-flip amplitude• electromagnetic hyperon production
• (K,) at 1.1 GeV/c
– proton or neutron to • hyperon photoproduction
• neutral meson detection
• New opportunities – (K-,0) at BNL around 1 MeV
• Youn
– (e,e’K+) at Jlab 600 keV• Hungerford
– New (+,K+) a few 100 keV• Noumi
– Gamma-ray spectroscopy a few keV• Tamura, Tanida
300 keV
Physics outline
• 12C spectrum reproduced, the core excited state at
Ex=6.6 MeV was puzzling.• 10B spectrum similarly favor strong spin singlet strength
for the LN interaction
• 7Li and Be are typical L hypernuclei treated by cluster model.
• 7Li spectrum is consistent with the gamma ray data. It also show the strength for T=1 states.
• 9Be spectrum show the 1--3- band of genuine L hypernuclear states. 8Be* core excited states are also observed with a distinct structure, whose position is not reproduced by the available cluster model.
• 13C spectrum shows clear shoulder structure at around Ex=10 MeV, which supposedly consists of 12C(0+)xp3/2 and 12C(1+)xs1/2, from which we may deduce the peak position for the p3/2 state. By combining the recent gamma ray data for p1/2, spin orbit splitting may be derived.
• Pik 16O spectrum can be compared with the CERN Kpi spectrum, from which we may conclude that the spin-orbit splitting is quite small.
spin-orbit splitting from the width of 12
C 2+ peak
• p peak assumed to be “equal strength doublet” & 2 MeV resolution– splitting : 1.2 +- 0.5 MeV
• consistent with the emulsion result(Dalitz)– 0.75 +- 0.1 MeV
|21+> ~ 11C(3/2-) x |p 3/2> (97.8%)
|22+> ~ 11C(3/2-) x |p 1/2> (99.0%)
Summary
• MeV hypernuclear reaction spectroscopy has matured to a level that allows quantitative investigation of their structure and N interaction through the structure information.
• The (,K+) reaction has established its value for hypernuclear spectroscopy since it favorably excites hypernuclear bound states.
• Much better resolution and high detection efficiency are required for the hypernuclear spectroscopy in the future.
• Sub-MeV reaction spectroscopy together with gamma-ray spectroscopy will further explore frontiers of strangeness nuclear physics.