Upload
izaiah-mulenga
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
1/10
OVERVIEW OF BIOMASS
PRETREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
YONGMING ZHUSCIENTIST
NovozymesTel. +4544460000Krogshjvej 36
2880 BagsvrdDenmark
A NOVOZYMES SHORT REPORT:
Novozymes2011-18610-01
Novozymes is the world leader in bioinnovation.Together with customers across a broad array ofindustries we create tomorrows industrialbiosolutions, improving our customers' businessand the use of our planet's resources. Read
more atwww.novozymes.com.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.novozymes.com/http://www.novozymes.com/http://www.novozymes.com/http://www.novozymes.com/mailto:[email protected]8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
2/10
8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
3/10
3
Wet oxidation
Wet oxidation was originally used as a means of wastewater treatment and soil
remediation, and later in the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Wet oxidation
involves water and air, oxygen, or hydrogen peroxide at elevated temperature and
pressure. Most of the hemicellulose is dissolved in the pretreatment, and it is possible
to achieve a moderate to high degree of delignification through oxidation (controlled
combustion). This process converts a large number of organic polymers (mainly
hemicellulose and lignin) to oxidized compounds, such as low-molecular-weight
carboxylic acids, alcohol, or even CO2and H2O. Wet oxidization is often carried out
with the addition of an alkali such as Na2CO3to reduce the reaction temperature and
the amount of hemicellulose being oxidized. The use of hydrogen peroxide hasattracted much interest in the past, but the high cost of this chemical could make this
technology economically unattractive. The introduction of pure oxygen to the reaction
has been challenged, since uncontrolled combustion can occur at the oxygen injection
points. In light of the facts mentioned above, it is unlikely that this pretreatment
method will find practical applications in biomass processing.
One advantage of the wet oxidation process is the lower production of furfural and 5-
hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), which are strong inhibitors in the fermentation step, as
a result of oxygen degradation of these components. However, for the same reason,
the hemicellulose sugars are largely lost, and thus the overall process yield and
economy would be diminished. Another concern associated with the oxidation process
is its exothermal nature, which requires sophisticated control of the process
parameters.
Lime pretreatment
Lime is an inexpensive and safe chemical, and is recyclable using established
technology (Kiln process). The process of lime pretreatment involves slurrying the
lime (either quicklime (CaO) or slaked lime (Ca(OH)2) with water, spraying it onto the
biomass material, and storing or heating the material for a period of time. One
seemingly cost-effective method is to pile the biomass and recycle the water at
ambient temperature, but this requires a very long processing time, and the quality of
the pretreated substrate is strongly affected by environmental conditions.
8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
4/10
4
Alternatively, the pretreatment can be performed in a closed reactor with temperature
and flow controls.
The enhanced digestibility of lime-treated biomass results mainly from lignin removal.
However, because lime is a weak base and has low solubility, lime alone is not able to
remove enough lignin in some high-lignin biomass to achieve good digestibility. In this
case, an oxidant needs to be added to promote delignification, and the process
essentially turns into an alkaline wet oxidation process. Lime pretreatment retains the
hemicellulose in the biomass solids very well, but removal of acetyl and the various
uronic acid substitutions of hemicellulose is nearly complete. Due to the low severity
of the process, little sugar decomposition occurs. However, recycling of the lime (fromcalcium salt or dissolved Ca(OH)2) results in the loss of substantial heat from the
combustion of lignin, so the generation of electricity in the plant is not justified.
Dilute acid pretreatment
Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass with dilute sulfuric acid or SO2at low
concentration (both < 2%, w/w) and 160200 C can effectively remove
hemicellulose, producing C5 sugar monomers in the liquid. The porosity of the cell
walls increases, which in turn increases the enzymes access to the cellulose surface.
The digestibility of the remaining cellulose correlates well to the degree of
hemicellulose removal. The removal of lignin is insignificant, and most (> 70%) is
retained in solids after the pretreatment.
Because the acid pretreatment is carried out at high temperature, the corrosive action
of the acid on metal is a major consideration in the design of the pretreatment
reactor. A high-grade alloy resistant to hot acid corrosion must be used for the reactor
construction. The reactor cost is thus a significant element of the total capital cost.
Dilute acid pretreatment forms certain levels of furfural and lignin degradation
products that are inhibitory to fermentation organisms. A lime neutralization step is
usually used to both neutralize and detoxify the pretreatment stream. The generation
of calcium sulfate gypsum during neutralization creates a disposal problem. An
alternative detoxification option is to use ion exchange membrane, but this is very
expensive.
8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
5/10
5
Aqueous ammonia pretreatment
Aqueous ammonia pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass can be performed either at
low temperature for a long time (SAA process; 25100 C, from 6 hr to 2 months) or
at high temperature for a short time (ARP process; 170190 C, 20 min 1 hr).
Delignification is effective, but hemicellulose solubilization is low or moderate. The
low-temperature treatment uses higher ammonia concentrations than the high-
temperature treatment (1530% vs. 510%, w/w). This pretreatment is an attractive
option because ammonia is cheap and safe, and is mostly recyclable. The
delignification in the low-temperature aqueous ammonia pretreatment (SAA process)
is highly selective, which means that the vast majority of carbohydrate remains in the
solids after the reaction. Water washing results in a clean and carbohydrate-rich
substrate with little need to worry about the sugar loss. This can simplify the
downstream bioprocess design but requires wastewater handling. The selectivity of
delignification at high temperature is not as good, that is, some hemicellulose sugars
are lost from the solids. A concern thus arises as to the recovery of the solubilized
hemicellulose sugars when using water washing.
Although most of the ammonia is recyclable after the pretreatment, some is not due
to its strong affiliation to water. In addition, some ammonia is consumed in the
pretreatment as a result of reaction with the acidic groups and lignin in biomass.
However, this portion of lost ammonia could be a nitrogen source for the fermentation
microorganisms. On-site storage of large quantities of liquid ammonia will be
associated with significant safety issues.
Ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX)
Instead of using aqueous ammonia, the ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) process
treats lignocellulosic biomass (4050% moisture content) with pure liquid ammonia at
mild temperature (80100 C) and high pressure (4050 atm) followed by explosive
pressure release. Instantly releasing the pressure in the AFEX process disrupts the
fiber structure of biomass and increases the accessible surface area, which improves
the digestibility of the biomass. Since ammonia is easily evaporated from the biomass
8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
6/10
6
solids, the total solids content after this pretreatment can be very high (up to 60%,
w/w) compared to other thermochemical pretreatments.
Water washing does not remove much lignin from the treated substrate, and most of
the lignin and carbohydrates remains in the solids. The lignin goes through the
subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis together with the carbohydrates. Recycling ammonia
consumes a large amount of energy (mostly attributed to the evaporation of liquid
ammonia), and contributes significantly to the process cost. In addition, as in the
aqueous ammonia pretreatment, on-site storage of liquid ammonia in an AFEX-based
plant creates safety concerns.
Organosolv pretreatment
As the name indicates, organosolv pretreatment uses organic solvents (ethanol,
acetone, carboxylic acids, etc.) as the treatment agent. This type of pretreatment is
usually carried out at elevated temperature (e.g., 200 C) and high pressure. For the
ethanol-based organosolv pretreatment, the catalytic mechanism is identical to that of
autohydrolysis. The solvent (e.g., ethanol) plays a role only in improving the
solubilization of lignin and, probably, in protecting the cellulose from solubilization as
well. Lignin and hemicellulose can be completely solubilized from the solids in the
pretreatment process, and a significant percentage of the soluble carbohydrates is
further decomposed to by-products such as furfural or 5-hydroxymethylfurfural
(HMF). The dissolved lignin can be precipitated by evaporating the organic solvent or
diluting the stream with cold water. This lignin is of high quality because it contains
no sulfur and low ash, and may find utilization in specialty chemical production.
There is a significant concern regarding the use of flammable organic solvents in
biomass processing, because the high operating temperature and the mechanisms for
moving biomass increase the risk of combustion and explosion. Also, the recovery of
the organic solvents is highly energy intensive. Because of the high energy cost and
significant hemicellulose sugar decomposition, the organosolv process is more often
viewed as a fractionation method than a pretreatment technology.
8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
7/10
7
Mechanical pretreatment
The cellulose crystalline structure can be broken down by mechanical treatment such
as fine milling (nanomilling), sonication, and so forth. The size of the materials after
milling is usually 0.22 mm. Mechanical desizing of biomass feedstock will not
separate the different fractions (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) to a significant
extent, since these are closely enmeshed in the structure of the biomass. However,
this type of treatment has been shown to improve the effect of downstream physical
and chemical pretreatments by increasing the contact surface area of the reactants.
The power required for mechanical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass depends on
the final particle size and the biomass characteristics, but is usually very high. This
largely prevents mechanical pretreatment from being considered an attractive optionin biomass processing.
Steam explosion/rapid expansion
In the steam explosion/rapid expansion operation, biomass treated with high-pressure
steam is rapidly discharged to a vessel operated at lower pressure (usually
atmospheric pressure). The sudden reduction in the pressure results in an explosion
effect on the biomass solids and physically destructs the fiber structure. The
crystallinity of the cellulose may decrease, and the surface of the substrate may
increase. The chemistry of steam processing involves the solubilization of
hemicellulose and lignin. These changes may help to improve cellulose digestibility.
However, it has long been disputed whether or not explosion is necessary in biomass
pretreatment. Despite this, some studies indicate that the main benefit of steam
explosion is to reduce the energy input for pumping and mixing of the substrates after
pretreatment. Steam explosion is often used as a technique to supplement acid or
base pretreatment at high temperatures.
Less developed pretreatment methods
A number of less developed pretreatment methods have also been pursued by
research institutes, academia, and industry; however, these technologies are currently
at an early stage compared to the pretreatment processes reviewed above. Because
of the limited information available, most of these technologies have not been
8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
8/10
8
reviewed in detail in the present paper. Below are a few comments on two emerging
technologies: ionic pretreatment and microwave pretreatment.
I o n i c l i q u id p r e t r e a t m e n t
Ionic liquids (ILs) are considered efficient and green cellulose solvents. They can
dissolve large amounts of cellulose in extremely mild conditions, with the possibility of
recovering nearly 100% of the ILs used at their initial degree of purity. This
technology has been used in the modern fiber-making industry to directly dissolve
cellulose. The dissolution mechanism involves the opening of the hydrogen bonds
between molecular chains of the cellulose using ILs. The solubilized cellulose was
found to have the same DP and polydispersity as the initial cellulose, but significantlydifferent macro- and microstructure, particularly the decreased degree of crystallinity.
As a result, the enzyme can easily access the dissolved cellulose, and hydrolysis is
extremely fast.
Application of ionic liquids has opened up a new method of biomass pretreatment and
fractionation. However, there are many challenges (including the high cost of ILs and
the methods for regeneration of the expensive solvent)to be addressed before this
technology can be put into practical use.
B io l o g ic a l p r e t r e a t m e n t
Biological pretreatment employs wood-degrading microorganisms, including white,
brown, and soft rot fungi, and bacteria to modify the chemical composition and/or
structure of the lignocellulosic biomass so that the modified biomass is more
amenable to enzyme digestion. Most biological pretreatment so far has focused on the
degradation of lignin in lignocellulosic biomass. However, degradation of lignin usually
accompanies the loss of cellulose and hemicellulose. In order to reduce and eliminate
the sugar loss during biological pretreatment, the microbial strains should have low
cellulase activity. White rot fungi are the most widely studied for biological
pretreatment since they can degrade lignin more effectively and more specifically.
Biological pretreatment appears to be a promising technique and has very clear
advantages, including no chemical requirement, low energy input, mild environmental
8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
9/10
9
conditions, and an environmentally friendly working manner. However, biological
pretreatment is very slow (taking from weeks to a year) and requires careful control
of growth conditions and a large amount of space to carry out. In addition, most
lignolytic microorganisms solubilize/consume not only lignin but also hemicellulose
and cellulose. Biological pretreatment therefore faces substantial techno-economic
challenges.
CONCLUSION
All of the pretreatment methods described above can lead to a high yield of glucosefrom cellulose as long as suitable feedstock and sufficient enzyme activities are used
in hydrolysis. In other words, it is not the enzymatic accessibility that matters in the
overall cost of biomass processing. However, the other factors such as enzyme
dosing, equipment cost, total recovery of sugars (especially hemicellulose sugars),
energy cost, and so forth, can vary dramatically among the various types of
pretreatment technologies and will result in different overall process economics. Also,
it is evident that the solid substrates obtained from different pretreatment methods
vary greatly in composition and properties, which implies that the optimal enzyme
recipes could be very different for each of the substrates. An in-depth understanding
of the substrates and how they affect the enzyme functions is important.
RECOMMENDED READING
Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, et al (2005), Features of promising technologiesfor pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology96 (6):
673686
Sun Y, Cheng JY (2002), Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanolproduction: a review. Bioresource Technology83 (1): 111
Eggeman T, Elander RT (2005), Process and economic analysis of pretreatmenttechnologies. Bioresource Technology 96 (18): 20192025
8/12/2019 Overview of Biomass Preatreatment
10/10
10
Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, et al (2005), Coordinated development ofleading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresource Technology96 (18):
19591966
Yang B and Wyman CE (2007), Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-costcellulosic ethanol. Biofuels,Bioproducts and Biorefining 2 (1): 2640
Laws, regulations, and/or third-party rights may prevent customers from importing, using, processing, and/or reselling the
products described herein in a given manner. Without separate, written agreement between the customer and Novozymes to
such effect, this document does not constitute a representation or warranty of any kind and is subject to change without further
notice.