Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Overview of NASA GRC Research on Damping of Jet Engine Blades
Kirsten P. Duffy Senior Research Associate
University of Toledo NASA Glenn Research Center
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
•
www.nasa.gov 1
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
• Aircraft Engine
Fan Combustor
Compressor Turbine
..... - ..... --
GE90 Turbofan Engine http://www.geaviation.com/education/theatre/ge90/
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 2
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Engine Blade Forced Vibration • 700
600
500
www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/caxial .html 100
o
Blade Vibration Modes
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
R Range 01 operating speeds
2000 4000 RotOf" speed, rpm
Engine order
6
5
_--1
6000
11>1 ~I dlag,.,., IOf" rotOf" blade ahowll"lQ poaalble '~pon .. tondlllon 'rom _ance (denoted by c:lrtlee,.
Reddyet. al. 1993 NASA TP-3406 "A review of recent aeroelastic analysis methods for propulsion at NASA Lewis Research Center"
www.nasa.gov 3
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Mistuning
• Blades are manufactured with slight differences • Problem -7 Localized vibration
• Solutions
• Increased damping
• Increased coupling among blades and disk
Response levels higher than predicted
"Advanced vibration analysis tools and new strategies developed for robust engine rotor development" 2005 Research and Technology Report - NASA Glenn Research Center Castanier & Pierre, U. of Michigan - Min, NASA
•
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 4
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•
Flutter
Flutter • Self-excited oscillation
• Airflow/blade interaction -7 instability
• Increasing damping can reduce the risk of flutter
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
.....,. ... lIc lnalAlblllty
I SUb~ &hili fluller la Syotom mode lnalJlbYIty II Choke tIutIw III Low-lncIcIence euperaonIc _er IV HIgh-lncidenCII III.,.. lOUie fluller V S......-.Ie bending &hili ttuner
100~ opeod line """'
\
V
eon.ctod ,..... flow
III
c-I Map _ng ptlnclpel typea of tIutIer end regiOnS ot oc:c:un.noe (rei. 4'.
Reddy et. al. 1993 NASA TP-3406 "A review of recent aeroelastic analysis methods for propulsion at NASA Lewis Research Center"
•
www.nasa.gov 5
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Future Aircraft • • Embedded engines
Benefits:
• Decreased noise
• Improved efficiency
• Possibility of short takeoff and landing
Problem: Non-uniform flow into engine - blade excitation
Cambridge-MIT Institute (CMI) SAX-40
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
Distorted Flow into Fan
www.nasa.gov 6
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Q) III C 0 Q. III Q)
a:: tl
:;:::; ro -en 0 -Q) III C 0 Q. III Q)
a:: tl
'E ro c >-0 -0 0
:;:::; ro a::
1000
100
10
1
0 .1
0 .75
Solution - Damping 0.020
0.015
_ 0.010 c
i 0.005
Q = 500, T] = 0.002, C, = 0.001 • ~ 0.000 ~ ~ -0.005 ~
0 ..0.010
-0.015
-0.020
Q" 50, "" 0 .02, ~ "O.O'/ '\ 0 1 2 3
~ V ~ t::--.. - -Q= 5, 0 .2, c:; = 0 1
Q = 0.5. I] = 2, C. = 1
I I I 0 .80 0 .85 0 .90 0 .95 1 .00 1.05 1.10 1.15
Ratio of Forcing Frequency to Resonant Frequency «(I)/6>n)
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
•
• , • 7 • Tlme(.)
I
.,
1.20 1.25
www.nasa.gov 7
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Engine Blade Damping • • Sources of damping* r.----Material damping
• -0.02%
• Very low for metals, higher for composites
Aerodynamic damping
• 0.1% - 1%
Structural/mechanical damping
• Friction at the blade root
• Friction at shrouds
• Platform damping
• Added damping treatments
• 0.5% - 3%
• Newer blade designs Integrally bladed disks (blisks) - no friction at blade/hub attachment
Highly-loaded blades - higher efficiency * Y. EI-Aini, R. deLaneuville, A. Stoner, V. Capece, "High Cycle Fatigue of
Turbomachinery Components - an Industry Perspective," AIAA-1997 -3365.
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
Pratt & Whitney Shrouded Fan Blade
I
I "l
I ':-'p.,l' ~.,.:~::~~.~.~<_ .. . ~J .. _ .L.~J~
" . / >. ~ ("'. <....,. -.J '--...
. ..... l '
.---- ------,J
GE Platform Damper Patent 5,478,207
www.nasa.gov •
National Aeronautics and Space Administration -0 NASA Damping Research
• Turbomachinery blade damping research at NASA Glenn
~ Impact damping
~ Viscoelastic damping of composite blades (with UC San Diego)
~ Plasma-sprayed damping coatings
~ High-temperature shape memory alloys
~ Piezoelectric materials - passive damping and active control
-_ ........ ----Composite Fan Blades - Tested with Viscoelastic Damping
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 9
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
• Aircraft Engine Blade Environment
Typical Target Application - lower-temperature:
• Titanium alloy fan or cold-side compressor blade
• Composite fan blade
Temperature -40 to 30()oC
Vibratory strain amplitude up to 10-3
Mean strain zero to 10-3
(from centrifugal loading)
Frequency 100 to 10~000 Hz
Typical blade loss factor 10-3 or lower
Target blade loss factor 10-2
Note: loss factor 17 = Q-l = 2(;= tan8
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov '0
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
• Analysis and Testing Procedure • Analysis - Simple reduced order models, structural finite element models,
aeroelasticity models (fluid/structure interaction)
• Testing - Bench testing, testing in simulated engine environments
• Test Articles - simple beam, flat plate, twisted plate, blade
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov "
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Self-Tuning Impact Damper -e
•
•
Impact Damper
Displacementdependent (nonlinear)
Immobilized at high-g's
g
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
• •
•
Tuned-Mass Damper
Frequency-dependent
Damping at tuning frequency
g
Displacements may be too large for blade cavity
•
•
g
Tuned Impact Damper
Frequency- and displacement-dependent (nonlinear)
Performs better at high-g's
www.nasa.gov 12
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Self-Tuning Impact Damper • 4.0
" "" .~ 3.5 Q. E 3.0 -< " '"' 2.5 .:= .;: c; 2.0 =G ~ 1.5 .. ~ 1.0
0.5
1\ ~
0.0
0.0
Free Decay Envelope
~\ \ '\ \ '" Without Darr ~er
\ ~ \.-. W illl Da'!'Jll'1 I'---
1.0 2.0 3.0
Time (seconds)
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
0.010
0.009
V' 0.008 ..r ~ 0.007 'u !E 0.006
Q)
8 0.005 OIl .5 0.004 0.. ~ 0.003
Q 0.002
0.001
0.000
r ~ with Irr pact Darr per
I Ill:, '\ ) ~ \ I '\ \
\ ~ \ ~
If "'- I:, \ ithout In pact Dar per
'---....
-
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0040
www.nasa.gov 13
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Self-Tuning Impact Damper • /
/'///,/,
/ Damper
Mass /
a
/, /,////
lJ' 0.012 <l . ~ 0.010 = ... c. e =
0.008
~ 'C ~
0.006 'C 'C
0.004 « 0.002
0.000
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
0.0
Tuned-Mass Damper vs Tuned Impact Damper
"'Tuned-Mass I-
Damper ...... Impact Damper l-
I--
+ Tuned Impact D: I--
)
~ "A ,...
I
~ '--- - -0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Ratio of Tuned-Mass Frequency to Blade Frequency
www.nasa.gov 14
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Self-Tuning Impact Damper Plate Top View Side View
Plate Motion
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 15
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Self-Tuning Impact Damper
Co <-, ~ '? // ~ ~ ~~ 18 Mode ~ ~ ~ 'N100 -- Short Plate ::r: -- ~~1. >-u 80 c::: Q) -----::I 18 Mode 0-Q)
60 Long Plate .... u. Q) u
~:::1 c::: 40 ro
c::: 0 VI Q)
20 Cl: Q) +-' ro c.. a
0 600 1200 1800 2400 Rotor Speed (RPM)
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov I.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Self-Tuning Impact Damper
0.014 ~-~--~-----r--T.=====::::::J=====::;] -+- N = 3 - 900 rpm
0.012 +--------Ir\-----+-----+---____+_ - N = 4 - 655 rpm V' t -A.-N=5-510rpm <l ~ 0.01 0 -l----Hc+---f-l---Il+----'d-"' +---_____+_ --0 - N = 3 - 1980 rpm ~ 'I' /' l -1J- N=4 - 1375rpm
.0. 0.008 I \ "J \ . \ -6 - N = 5 - 960 rpm E I ~~ , I --Impact Damper
~ 0.006 l .;J \ "0 ~...... ,, ~ \ ~ " ~ 0.004 -"'\. ~ ~~.'-----l,...----l'l/,,---' --,--,, _,,----++ ,'...t __ ----+_----+_---+-__ ----i
«"0 ~, V',,' \ I \
,, ~ .. \ \ \ 0.002 , I ~
+ ___ "L'l'-+-_~_~V+~---- ~r-:::::-,,_ :::::::: ::: i... - _ =::: ...
0.000 W ~
o 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Rotor Speed (rpm)
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
•
www.nasa.gov 17
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Viscoelastic Damping • •
•
Complex Modulus
• E = E1+i E2 = E1(1+i 11)
• El - Storage Modulus
• E2 - Loss Modulus
• 11 - Loss Factor
• Properties dependent on frequency and temperature
Material Behavior
• Glassy region - polymer chains highly ordered - higher stiffness
• Transition region - high damping
• Rubbery region - lower stiffness, lower damping
• Energy Dissipation
• Through shear stress
• Constrained layer treatment
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
Glassy Region Transition RegiorRubbery Regiorflow Regi
~ , , ,
E, "5 "'C
~ ..... .§
~ If .3 (/) "'C .§ C III Q) C) III ..... .9 (f)
Temperature Roush-Anatrol
www.nasa.gov '8
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Viscoelastic Damping • Composite Fan Blade
Kosmatka, Appuhn, Mehmed AIM Paper 2002-1511
" Design and Testing of Integrally Damped First-Stage Composite Fan Blades"
Fig. 3 Blade componenlS
Kosmatka, Lapid, Mehmed - AIM Paper 96-1598 "Passive vibration control of advanced composite turbo
fan blades using integral damping materials"
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
High
resonant stress area
Viscoelastic material
• Collaboration between NASA GRC and John Kosmatka - UC San Diego
• Place viscoelastic material within pocket between graphite/epoxy plies
• Locate visco in area of high modal shear stress
)0> Successful demonstration in dynamic spin testing at NASA Glenn
www.nasa.gov 1.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Viscoelastic Damping I«!~
[] -damping sandwich l OC!:.(l
1 0c!~
",,"I
I..,"'"
: I G'Z<J >
ritanituu 1 ~.()&
spar IOe ...
me '"0 U'~ mo leo we lIDO In ,.0 I" 1'"50
Unidirectional graphireJ~xy
Parch definition for optinnuu d<Ullping of first chord-wis .. mode (1581 Hz).
damping -.-I---~sandwich
titanium
Fig. 5 Patch definirion for mmomum damping of first chord-\v~se 1llOde (1581 Hz).
~Q'b:'
Fig 10 Pow« Spoctrum Comparison for the I" Chord""e Mod< at I QQQ RPM
!CC!:4
t.X! .(!
t~!.(J
toe! '(J ~
10;2.:,.l
I )O.! .o'
IY.!~~ __ --~--__ ~--~ ____ ~--~ __ --~
1110 11") 1!9C 1m 1430 160e In 1m 1· .0 1")(, 1:»
~h)
Fit' 21 Pow« SPOCtnllll Comporison for the I" Chord",,,, Mod< .t 3 QQQ RPM
Kosmatka, Appuhn, Mehmed - AIAA Paper 2002-1511 "Design and Testing of Integrally Damped First-Stage
Composite Fan Blades"
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
•
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Damping Surface Treatment • Examples:
• Viscoelastic surface treatment
• Plasma-sprayed damping coating
• Surface-mounted high-damping shape memory alloy
• Surface-mounted shunted piezoelectric patch
Oberst beam - thin layer of damping material on beam surface
• Very thin layer:
1] beam + damping ~ 31] damping
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
EdamPing
E beam
·.JDltanium . .JllcIY beam with plasma-sprayed
coating
t damping
t beam
www.nasa.gov 21
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Plasma-Sprayed Damping Coatings • • Typical coatings currently in use
Thermal-barrier coating
• Allow higher-temperature airflow while insulating metallic blades
Environmental-barrier coating
• Erosion-resistance, durability
Added benefit ~ damping
• Damping mechanism Low temperature (compressor application) -friction between IIsplats" of coating material - strain level dependent
High temperature (turbine application) -elevated damping corresponds with decrease in Young's modulus of the coating-tem peratu re-dependent
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
Plasma Spray Torch
Sona coat .J ~' 1- • i .. \ I ,'''' .. . . ~" . .. ."
Plasma-Sprayed Coating used for Damping Test
www.nasa.gov 22
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Plasma-Sprayed Damping Coatings • High-temp application
Zhu, Miller, Duffy, Ghosn - 2009 "High remperatu re Damping Behavior of Plasma-Sprayed
Thermal Barrier and Protective Coatings" The 33rd International Conference on Advanced Ceramics &
Composites
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
4500
50 l-
40 r
30 I-
20 r
10 I-
o 4500
5000 5500
I
:::k · • I
1230C~~
I
5000 5500
Frequency (Hz)
6000 6500 7000
, .J' 11 '-
LV\.. ~\...
, :.4 ' ::.,...--..-
• ......-..... . • .......-.. I I
c c ~ ... • • -----..d'.
)\ ..,!'-
./'c. -, I .cI
6000 6500 7000
Frequency (Hz)
7500 8000
~RT
-<>- 258C-heating
---0-- 522C-heating
----<r- 660C-heating
---<I-- 890C-heating
--Q- 9SSe-heating
--- 1032C-heating J -
------ 1123C -heating
..... ;:, -
't-.o-. 7500
-
-
-{}- 1230C-heating - I I 27C-cooling
------ 1036C-cooling
- 95QC-cooling
~ 893C-cooling
---15>-- 776C -cooling
- 659C-cooling
- 523C-cooling
- 259C-cooling
800~ RT-cooling
www.nasa.gov 23
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Shape Memory Alloys
Stress
~lal1ensite
Phase nmsfonnation Region
Austenite Phase
MfMs As Af Top Temperamre
.4mtmite • High temperature phase • Cubic Crystal Structure
lI1arlell.f"ite • Low temperature phase • Monoc1ini c Crystal Structure
II Twinned Martensite
smart.tamu.edu Lagoudas
Detwinned Martensite
Coolulg
H~ating Wire Contracts
==>
Weight
Cooling Wire E'ttends
>
Shape Mmlory Alloy Wire Actuator
DetwuUling
Heating Rero,"ery
Figure 1. DiHerent phases of an SMA. F9K'e 3. Schemedc 01 •• tr .... streln.tamperature curve showing the shape memory enacL
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 24
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
High-Temperature Shape Memory Alloys • High-Temperature Shape Memory Alloys are an enabling technology to a host of " smart" structures in jet engines
Shape ch.mging blOldeS Aniculating vanes
Acoustic Flow control liners devices
Advantages of HTSMA
Active Clearance
Control
• High force per volume/weight - compact, lightweight
vectored exhaust nozzles & V~S
• Solid State - eliminates hydraulics, pneumatics, mechanical systems Simple, frictionless , quiet, maintenance free
• Passive control - eliminates sensors, electronics • Can be actively controlled for high-force, precision movements
"Characterization of a New Phase and its Effect on the Work Characteristics of a Near-Stoichiometric Ni30 Pt20 Ti50 (at.%) HighTemperature Shape Memory Alloy (HTSMA)", Garg et. aI., Presentation at The International Conference on Shape Memory and
Superelastic Technologies (SMST) 2008, 21-25 Sep. 2008; Stresa; Italy
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 25
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
High-Temperature Shape Memory Alloys
• HTSMAs - High temperature and force capability
- Low frequency applications
• Potential engine applications Surge control rod for a centrifugal compressor - avoid instability
• "Development of a HTSMA-Actuated Surge Control Rod for High-Temperature Turbomachinery Applications" Padula et. aI. , 15th AIAAlASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference; 23-26 Apr. 2007
Supersonic inlet compression ramp - improve engine efficiency • "Development and Test of an HTSMA Supersonic Inlet Ramp Actuator (Future of
SMA)" Quackenbush et. aI. , Proceedings of the 15th SPIE Smart Structures/NDE Annual International Symposium, vol. 6930, 2008, paper 6930-25.
Active blade tip clearance control - improve engine efficiency • "Progress on Shape Memory Alloy Actuator Development for Active Clearance
Control" DeCastro, Melcher, and Noebe, NASA-CP-2006-214383
Adaptive exhaust chevrons - noise reduction • "Benchtop Demonstration of an Adaptive Chevron Completed Using a New High
Temperature Shape-Memory Alloy" Noebe and Padula, NASA GRC 2005 Research and Technology Report
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www. nasa.gov 26
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Shape Memory Alloy Damping • NiTiHf samples tested for modulus and damping
properties
Looking for damping in phase-transition region
Purely passive damping properties
Damping is temperature-dependent
•
Tested using Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) at 0-3000 C and at 0.1-200 Hz
SU'ess
Cit
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
Martensite Phase
Austenite Phase
MfM. As Af Top Temperanu'e
www.nasa.gov 27
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Shape Memory Alloy Damping 2.0 -E
E -c: .2 1.0 1:) Q) ;;: Q)
c 0.0
- - -. -- - --~
Martens ite
Static Force Test
\. ........... Aus ~enite
" i\ "' \ -- -- -- ----
- DMA Test - Low Frequency ~ 100000 .--------,------,---,--------'--,---1 -'------,-----,
- - - _ Modulus ~ 80000 r-----r---",,--t:-=-.......~~:::;;:::;;::;:::;;;;:::~:::r .2 "" /- - - -'" j'"-:::l 60000 +----t-----t--.,,~-+---~_;;/----t-----t-
" ~ 40000 f-- -- Heat!ng f--+-----,_ ---'-----A----+------+
.tII - - - Cooling / / \ Loss / \ § 20000 +-----+--_ - /-----v'--------.-\ ,~acto/--+---+-1"-t------+---+
~ 0 +-~~~~~=i==~~,~~-~-~-~~-~-~~~~~
•
0.5
0.4 !=" ... 0
0.3 -CJ as 0.2
u.. til til
0.1 0 ..J
0.0
o 50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature (0C) Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 28
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Shape Memory Alloy Damping
100000
- 80000 ns 0-:E -I/) 60000 ::l
I ~
~ Modulus
\ ~ 7 0.1 Hz "" ::l
"0 1 Hz 0 :E .1/) 40000
10 Hz 100 Hz
C) C ::l 0 > 20000 / Loss
Factor
Tested in Heating
L It\ -o o 50 100 150 200 250
Temperature (oC)
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0 300
•
~
.: 0 -u ns u. I/) I/) 0
...J
www.nasa.gov 29
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
• Piezoelectric Materials
• High-temperature piezoelectric materials Off-the-shelf high-temperature material- Type-II PZT - Tc = 350°C
NASA GRC-developed materials - Tc = 430°C
• Potential engine applications Active combustion control
• Mitigate thermo-acoustic instabilities and/or gas flow control to improve efficiency
Synthetic jets for active flow control
Energy harvesting
- "High-Temperature Piezoelectric Material Developed" Sayir and Sehirlioglu, NASA GRC 2007 Research and Technology Report
- "Doping of BiSc03 -PbTi03 Ceramics for Enhanced Properties" Sehirlioglu, Sayir, and Dynys, Materials Science and Technology Meeting ASMjACERS; 5-9 Oct. 2008; Pittsburgh, PA
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 30
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
High-Temperature Piezoelectric Material -Objective: Piezoelectric material development for damping system for high temperature turbomachinery blade applications.
20000
Slip cast patches of GRC·63L composition developed and processed at NASA Glenn Ceramics Branch
,-----------,
2x10 ')
r~============================~~~ E 12
./ Higher operating temperature ~ c: 8
'/Higher piezoelectric coefficient ,g .~
./ Higher Coercive field ~ 4
o~~==~~_~~o X Lower energy conversion efficiency 0..
~ o 100 200 300 400 sao 10 20 30
•
03
c: .§
0.1 ii5
Temperature ('C) E-field (kV/cm)
l Material 1 r----------------------- --.l Device Comparison to the state of the art material
~"""~"'P."!"I'! Temperature (0C)
Ferroelectric and Electromechanical
Curie Oepoling
GRC-63L 430 352
PZT-II 315 280
Piezoelectric (100 °C) coupling coefficients
Ec (kV/cm)
23
12
d33 (pC/N)
625
585
0.43 0.22
0.52 0.28
.Points of Contact: Ceramics. Branchl Dr. Alp Sehirlioglu, 216-433-6159, Dr. Ali Sayir, 216-433-6254, Dr. Fred Dynys, 216-433-2404
·n ~ c .,
www.nasa.gov 31
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Piezoelectric Damping
• Concept: Piezoelectric material under load produces an electric field
Place piezoelectric material in an area of high modal stress in/on the blade
Passive damping technique - place a shunt circuit across the piezo material to dissipate energy
Active vibration control - use piezo materials as actuators and sensors with a control system to actively reduce vibration level
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
www.wikipedia.org
•
www.nasa.gov 32
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Piezoelectric Damping • Metal blades
Require machining to place piezoelectric material and circuits
Possible placement below blade platform
• Composite blades Embed piezoelectric material between plies
Weave piezoelectric fibers into the plies - 15-250 micron diameters
_M
. ,...... ~
•
Hilbert et. al. Patent 6,299,410
Fibers - Advanced Cerametrics Inc.
Damping c=::> if material
High resonant
stress area
Kosmatka et.a!.
•
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 33
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Piezoelectric Damping
• Resistive Circuit (R-Circuit) - Energy dissipated through the resistor
Broad frequency range, lower damping
• Tuned Resonant Circuit (RL-Circuit) - Tuned to resonance frequency through
the inductor
Higher damping at target frequency
- Inductor is a simple coiled wire
- fully passive
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
•
www.nasa.gov 34
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Piezoelectric Damping •
Air-Core Inductor
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
Optimal inductor for 700-800Hz
0.69 H wound inductor:
• 34-gauge wire
• 0.75-inch inner diameter
• 2.6-inch outer diameter
• 0.30-inch length
• SlOW • Too large for blade application
Inductor size required for higher frequencies:
• 2000 Hz - 0.1 H
• 5000 Hz - 0.015 H
www.nasa.gov 35
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Piezoelectric Damping • Clamp
• • 3.2 in
••
3B Mode - Modal Deformation
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
Mide qplOw PZT-SA patch 1.31" x 1.81" x 0.010" thick
Ti 6AI-4V 0.078" thick plate
3B Mode - von Mises Modal Strain
www.nasa.gov 36
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Piezoelectric Damping Laser Target
Location
Piezoelectric Patch
25 .. '0
= ... ·S 20 ~ 01
~ = 15 <= .• ... OJ
=
\
I Short Circuit
/
1/\ f \ }
I t
Clamp Accelerometer
Open Circuit J
10 = '"' .. ~ '" 5 = 01
H Rl-Circuit I L ~\ I R-Circuit I
I~ ....::;: '" -- ,:--... .. Eo-
0
670 675 680 Frequency (Hz)
685 690
•
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 37
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Active Control with Piezoelectrics • E 1 xcitation Excitation/Co
+ Source ntrol System Am 1 o 0
HP dSP
+1 Am
An aly -ACE + o 0
Am I'" _a,
Ben Choi - NASA GRC
Bmr~q_Re~~ __ ~ ____ ~_6_:1 ____ ~~r-____ ~
1111 ~~?-~~:l-~~~-I~-I---~
1-J"'-----·tJncontrolletH-------1
-5611c FlllCtn log Hz ~er~ X:1.62725icHz Y:·8.96386dB
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009
Sensor from the otber ;ide
"~
(
~ QP21b ~ l4.
1 V el et
rom r
2-Stripe Mode Shape
Fr~R~~ CliO; 1 Br---------------------------~
-A----~~L~-- . '~----1 .,-/ ------£!;ontrotterl--
FLrdn Log Hz
www.nasa.gov 38
Piezoelectric Damping
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•
Dynamic Spin Facility Rotor with Tapered Test Plates
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 39
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
~ r.. .s ~ ~
t;;;;.
'" '" Q oJ
0.010
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0.000
2000
Piezoelectric Damping R-Circuit vs. Open Circuit Damping in Spin Rig
·3B-O-C
• 3B-R-C • ... Increase (3B-R-C - 3B-O-C) : • • • • • • • I • I • I • •
I • I , a • • , , • • • 1 t ...
a • • t i ...
2500 3000 3500
Rotor Speed (RPM)
• I I
I I
I I
I I I I
!
,
4000
Spin test: -11] = 0.0018 (average based on tip displacement) Shaker test: -11] = 0.0025 (based on tip velocity)
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 40
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Current Research Plans
• Plasma-sprayed damping coatings - Measure modulus and damping of individual coatings
• HTSMA damping SMA materials with less temperature hysteresis
SMA materials with phase transitions less frequency-dependent
• Piezoelectric damping Application to metal blades
• Continue spin testing of passive damping with tuned RL-circuit
• Begin spin testing of actively controlled plates
Application to composite fan blades
• Embedding piezoelectric materials/patches within composite blades
Trade studies
• Determine potential weight savings for entire engine
•
Penn State University Seminar - 12/2009 www.nasa.gov 41