Upload
nicholas-griffith
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Overview of Recent Highlights from ISOL Facilities
Juha ÄystöDepartment of Physics, University of Jyväskylä
& Helsinki Institute of PhysicsFinland
Introduction to ISOL and Physics
Low-energy and stopped beam experimentsMasses, charge radii, exotic decays
Post-accelerated ISOL beamsCoulex and fusion
Conclusions
Overview of Recent Highlights from ISOL Facilities
Juha ÄystöDepartment of Physics, University of Jyväskylä
& Helsinki Institute of PhysicsFinland
Introduction to ISOL and Physics
Low-energy and stopped beam experimentsMasses, charge radii, exotic decays
Post-accelerated ISOL beamsCoulex and fusion
Conclusions
I am thankful to many colleagues, in particular to C. Gross, P. Butler, G. Bollen, J.-M- Poutissou and P. Van Duppen
driver accelerator
thin target high-temperature thick target
fragment separator
experiment
ion source
mass separator
storage ringcooling
In Flight ISOL
heavy ions light ions, neutrons
post accelerator
GeV/u (s) meV to 100 MeV/u
(ms to several s)
gas catcher
(ms)
IGISOL(ms)
Cooling & trappingCharge breeding
experiment
RILIS
NEW !!!
SHIPTRAPGSI
ISOLDECERN
SPIRALGANIL
ISOL-JAERI
ISACTRIUMF
HRIBFOak Ridge
ANL
LEBIT-MSU
SLOWRIRIKEN
IGISOL Jyväskylä
+ IGISOLs at Sendai and Warsaw
EXCYTCatania
LISOLLeuven
Thick target ISOL
IGISOL / gas catcher
ISOL
RIB Physics Reach
A major question: SHELL STRUCTURE FAR FROM STABILITY ?
IMPACT ON R-PROCESS ?
Spin-orbit ?Pairing ?Effective force ?-tensor forceContinuum-coupling?……
Spin-orbit ?Pairing ?Effective force ?-tensor forceContinuum-coupling?……
B. Pfeiffer et al. Acta Phys. Polon. B27(1996)
?
J.D
ob
aczew
ski an
d W
.Nazare
wic
zP
hil.
Tra
ns.
R.
Soc.
Lon
d.
A356,
2007 (
1998)
J.D
ob
aczew
ski an
d W
.Nazare
wic
zP
hil.
Tra
ns.
R.
Soc.
Lon
d.
A356,
2007 (
1998)Shell gap energy and magicity ? – HFB + SkP calculationShell gap energy and magicity ? – HFB + SkP calculation
100Sn
78Ni
132Sn
48Ca
208Pb
NEW ISOL-DATA !!!
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 310
10
10
10
10
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
SPEGTOFI
HALF-LIFE RANGE [s]
AC
CU
RA
CY
m/m
Direct Mass Measurement Techniques
Penning traps
ESR-TOF
ESR Schottky
D. Lunney, et al., Rev. Mod. Ph. 75(2003)1021
M/M < 10-7
M/M < 10-5
Bm
qc B
m
qc
B
Penning trap
STEPS of measurement:
* cooling and bunching in buffer gas filled RFQ (ms)
* mass selective cooling & purification in preparation Penning trap (> 10 ms); R=105
* mass measurement or isomer separation in precision Penning trap (100 ms); R=106
For details: See A. Jokinen (A1-4), S. George (F9-4), P. Schury (H2-6), J. Dilling (J2-1), A. Herlert (QW-071), A. Jokinen (QT227)
PERFORMANCE:
R = 107
→ δm/m ≥ 8 10-9
PERFORMANCE:
R = 107
→ δm/m ≥ 8 10-9
1m
Bunches,3keV energy
60keV ISOLDE-
ion beam
1 c m
5 cm
60 000 V
B = 4.7 T
B = 6 T
Linear RFQ trap
ISOLTRAP
1 cm
100 MeV/u 1 eV
Penning trap mass measurements
Laser spectroscopy soon
Gas stopping
Beam preparation
LEBIT
Fissiontarget
Analysing magnet
spectroscopic setup
precision trap
microchannel plate (MCP)
IGISOL facility
JYFLTRAP setup
7 T
mag
net
purification trap
Si 1
Si 2
+
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Coun
ts/f
req
uency
106490010648001064700
Frequency Hz
A = 101
Y
Zr
Nb
Mo
Purification trap
Precision trap
JYFLTRAP
[18] G. Bollen, D. Davies, M. Facina, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 152501 (2006).
A. Herlert, et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 251, (2006) 131
T. Eronen, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 232501 (2006)
M/M < 10-7
M/M < 10-5
Bm
qc B
m
qc
B
Penning trapCERN Jyväskylä
NSCL-MSU
8
8
20
20
50
50
126
82
82
28
28
Highlights of nuclear mass measurements at ISOL facilitiesHighlights of nuclear mass measurements at ISOL facilities
LEBIT @ MSU:38Ca, 70mBr, 68Se44S, n-rich 65Fe and 66Co
LEBIT @ MSU:38Ca, 70mBr, 68Se44S, n-rich 65Fe and 66Co
CPT @ Argonne:46V, 64Geheavy fission products
CPT @ Argonne:46V, 64Geheavy fission products
ISOLTRAP @ CERN:~300 isotopes measured22Mg,32Ar, 72Kr 74Rb, 81Zn, 133Sn
ISOLTRAP @ CERN:~300 isotopes measured22Mg,32Ar, 72Kr 74Rb, 81Zn, 133Sn
SHIPTRAP @ GSI:masses of rp nucleidrip-line nuclei
SHIPTRAP @ GSI:masses of rp nucleidrip-line nuclei
JYFLTRAP @ Jyväskylä:~200 isotopes measured26Si, 62Ga, 92Rhfission products; 83Ga, 110Mo
JYFLTRAP @ Jyväskylä:~200 isotopes measured26Si, 62Ga, 92Rhfission products; 83Ga, 110Mo
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
Z
N
92Br: Sn=3.2 MeV
JYFLTRAP
ISOLTRAP at CERNISOLTRAP at CERN
STABLE
100Sn 132Sn
78Ni
189 NEW MASSES
Niobium ?
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
[ma
ss(A
ME
20
03
) -
ma
ss(e
xp)]
/ M
eV
100 100m 101 102 102m 103 104 105 106 107
Nb isotope
New mass measurements of fission products
T1/2 ≈ 100 ms
28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 486
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
S
2n (
Me
V)
Z
50 45 40 35 302
3
4
5
6
7
Sh
ell g
ap
(M
eV
)
Z
AME03 TRAP data
N=50
46
48 50
52
5490Zr
78Ni
EVOLUTION OF N=50 SHELL GAP
Next critical mass: 82Zn !!ISOLTRAP ???
Isotopes measured by laser spectroscopy-H.-J. Kluge and W. NörtershäuserSpectrochim. Acta B 58,(2003) 1031
Measured at IGISOL- cooled and bunched ion beams- refractory element
11Li (8.5 ms); ISAC *, 6He; ANL
n-rich yttrium isotopes; IGISOL *
multi-qp isomers; IGISOL130mBa (10 ms), 178m1Hf…
n-rich Be; SLOWRI @ RIKEN
31Mg HFS+NMR; ISOLDE
Highlights of laser spectroscopy at ISOL facilitiesHighlights of laser spectroscopy at ISOL facilities
Next 8He at GANIL ?
2s 2S1/2
3s 2S1/2
2p 2P1/2,3/2
3d 2D3/2,5/2= 30 ns
735 nm
610 nm
5.4 eV
Lithium atomic levels
Resonance Ionization of 11Li
735 nm
6,7,8,9,11Li
Laser @735 nm
Laser @610 nm
ElectrostaticLenses
PZT
CO-Laser2
Magnet
Ion Signal
Experimental setup
3.104 Atoms/sTechnique developed at GSI.
3.104 Atoms/sTechnique developed at GSI.
R. Sánchez et al., PRL 96, 033002 (2006)Nature Physics 2, 145 (2006)M. Puchalski et al., PRL 97, 133001 (2006)
R. Sánchez et al., PRL 96, 033002 (2006)Nature Physics 2, 145 (2006)M. Puchalski et al., PRL 97, 133001 (2006)
Results: Nuclear Charge Radii
6 7 8 9 10 11
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7 Pachucki LBSM SVMC DCM AV18IL2 NCSM FMD SVMCFC
rc (f
m)
Li IsotopeI. Tanihata et. al. PRL 55, 2676 (1985)I. Tanihata et. al. PL B 206, 592 (1988)
This surprising result indicates that the Li-core is indeed strongly perturbed or polarized by interactions between halo neutrons and core nucleons.
+40 kV
Ion beam cooler
Light collection region
(Laser resonance fluorescence)
Traps and accumulates ions – typically 100 - 500 ms
Reduces energy spread of ion beam (< 1eV)
Improves emittance of ion beam
Releases ions in a 10 µs bunch
Beam cooling and bunching with RFQA. Nieminen, et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 204 (2003) 563
Beam cooling and bunching with RFQA. Nieminen, et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 204 (2003) 563
2∙104 improvement of SNR !Allows to work with 100 ions/s rates
174Hf
20.0
20.1
20.2
20.3
20.4
20.5
17,8
18,2
18,6
19,0
19,4
19,8
20,2
84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104Mass Number, A
<r2>
A /
fm2
Stable Isotopes
Radioactives
Isomers
Yttrium charge radii
Yttrium charge radii B. Cheal et al., Phys. Lett. B 645, 133 - 137 (2007).
48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
S2n
[M
eV
]
Neutron number
Pd Rh Ru Tc Mo Zr Sr Rb Br
Increased binding due to large prolate deformation!
Result very similar to neighboring Sr and Zr chains
Shape coexistence!
8
8
20
20
50
50
126
82
82
28
28
Highlights of decay studies at ISOL facilitiesHighlights of decay studies at ISOL facilities
ISOLDE & IGISOL: Triple- structure of 12C12N & 12B 3decay
ISOLDE & IGISOL: Triple- structure of 12C12N & 12B 3decay
ISOL at GSI: *2He decay of 94mAg ISOL at GSI: *2He decay of 94mAg
JYFLTRAP @ Jyväskylä: Trap-assisted spectroscopy104Zr,113Tc,…
JYFLTRAP @ Jyväskylä: Trap-assisted spectroscopy104Zr,113Tc,…
HRIBF at Oak Ridge:Ranging out spectroscopy79Cu, 85Ga,…
HRIBF at Oak Ridge:Ranging out spectroscopy79Cu, 85Ga,…
Several facilities: *Superallowed -decays 22Mg, 26Al,…62Ga,74Rb
Several facilities: *Superallowed -decays 22Mg, 26Al,…62Ga,74Rb
LISOL at Leuven:RILIS in decay studies 67mCo,…
LISOL at Leuven:RILIS in decay studies 67mCo,…
ISOL @ JAERI:Heavy fission productsISOL @ JAERI:Heavy fission products
ISOLDE:132Sn-region spectroscopyISOLDE:132Sn-region spectroscopy
10C
14O
26mAl
38mK
42Sc
46V
50Mn
54Co
34Cl
Ft = 3072.7 ± 0.8 sVud = 0.9738 (4)From Ft and GA of muon decay
J.C Hardy and I.S. Towner, Phys. Rev. C 71(2005)055501
)1(2))(1( 2 V
RVCR
G
KftFt
’ 1+NS
New Q-value determinations with Penning Traps
22Mg M. Mukherjee et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 15080126Alm,42Sc, 46V T. Eronen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 23250134Ar F. Herfurth et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 15 (2002) 1738Ca G. Bollen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 15250146V G. Savard et al,, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 10250162Ga T. Eronen et al., Phys. Lett. B 636 (2006) 19174Rb A. Kellerbauer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 072502
Alarming new result of QEC of 46V from CPT and JYLFTRAP: (QEC)=2.2 (9) keV ?
--> Need to check all QEC values !
Unitarity of CKM matrix?= -0.0034(14) !!Unitarity of CKM matrix?= -0.0034(14) !!
CVC and the unitarity of the CKM matrix !
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
3060
3065
3070
3075
3080
3085
3090
3095
Co
mp
ara
tive
ha
lf-lif
e [
s]
Z of the daughter nucleus
Hardy&Towner, PRC71(-05)055501 JYFLTRAP CPT ISOLTRAP
10C14O
22Mg26Alm
34Cl34Ar
38Km
42Sc
46V50Mn
54Co62Ga
74Rb
New data (ISOLDE, ISAC, IGISOL, CPT)
New yet unpublished measurements26Al, 26Si, 42Ti, 50Mn, 54C0
Current Status – CKM Matrix
Unitarity check via the matrix elements of the first row:
Vus and Vub from particle physics data (K and B meson decays)
• Most precise Vud From nuclear β decay !
• 4th Int. Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle, Nagoya, 12/2006
Δ+1=++2
ub
2
us
2
ud VVV
2257(20)0.Vus M. Moulson, ArXiV:hep-ph/0703013
08(10)000- .Δ
J. C. Hardy, ArXiV:hep-ph/0703165v1Vud = 0.97378(27)
Confirms the unitarity, but more work needed on theoretical corrections as well as new data!
Post-accelerated ISOL
FACILITY DRIVER POWER USER BEAMSACCELERATED
ENERGY PHYSICSREACH
LOUVAINE-LA-NEUVE (BELGIUM) 1989
30 MeV protons
6 kW 6He, 7Be, 10,11C, 13N, 15O, 18F, 18,19Ne, 35Ar
10 MeV/ucyclotron
Astrophysics, Nuclear structure
HRIBFOak Ridge (USA) 1997
100 MeVp, d, (-ve ion source)
1 kW 7Be, 17,18F, 69As, 67,83Ga, 75-79Cu, 80-87Ge, 84Se, 92Sr, 118,120,122,124Ag, 129Sb, 130-134Sn, 132,134,136Te
2 - 10 MeV/utandem
Nuclear Structure, Astrophysics
ISACTRIUMF (CANADA) 2000
500 MeV protons
50 kW 8,9,11Li, 11C, 20,21Na, 18Ne, 26Al, 34Ar
4.5 MeV/ulinac
Astrophysics,Condensed matter, Nuclear Structure
SPIRALGANIL (FRANCE) 2001
100 MeV/u heavy ions
6 kW 6,8He, 15,19-21O, 18F, 17-19,23-26Ne, 33-35, 44,46Ar, 74-77Kr
2 - 25 MeV/ucyclotron
Nuclear structure, Astrophysics
REX ISOLDE (CERN)2001
1.4 GeV protons
3 kW 8,9Li, 10,11Be,24-29Na, 28-32Mg, 68Ni, 67-73Cu, 74,76,78,80Zn, 70Se, 88,92Kr, 108In, 108,110Sn,122,124,126Cd, 138,140,142,144Xe, 148Pm, 153Sm, 156Eu
0.3 - 3 MeV/ulinac
Nuclear structure, Condensed matter, Astrophysics
counts
counts
energy (keV)
78Zn
80Zn
108Pd
730 keV: 2+-0+
1492 keV: 2+-0+
0 500 1000 1500 2000
800
600
400
200
0
80
60
40
20
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000
80Ga
78Ga 108Pd
x 5
0
• 80Zn (T1/2=0.5 s) @ 108Pd (2.0 mg/cm2)Energy = 2.79 MeV/uIntensity = 3000 ppsPurity = 43 (5) %
• 78Zn (T1/2=1.5 s) @ 108Pd (2.0 mg/cm2)Energy = 2.87 MeV/uIntensity = 4300 ppsPurity = 64 (13) %
Coulomb excitation of even-even Zn isotopes up to N=50 *
laser onlaser off
* J. Van de Walle et al., to be published
Proton NumberNeutron Number
Ni
Zn
Ge
N=50 isotones
B(E
2,2
+1
0+
1)
[W.u
.]E(2
+1)
[keV
]
B(E
2,2
+1
0+
1)
[W.u
.]E(2
+1)
[keV
]Ni,Zn,Ge isotopes
this work
Ge up to N=50: HRIBF exp: Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(2005)122501
Result in conformity with the new mass data !
Enhancement of 9Li sub-barrier fusion
• W. Loveland et al, Physical Review C 74(2006) 064609
ISAC I at TRIUMF
Shapira et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 25, s01, 241 (2005)Liang et al., PRL 91, 15271 (2003); PRC 75, 054607 (2007)
Fusion with heavy n-rich radioactive beams
• Large sub-barrier fusion enhancement• Inelastic excitation and neutron transfer play an
important role in the observed fusion enhancement
• Important for superheavy element synthesis• ERs made with 132,134Sn cannot be made with stable
Sn!
Fusion with n-deficient radioactive beams
76Kr + 58Ni
130Nd (4p)131Pm (3p)129Pr (5p)
SPIRAL(GANIL)
Conclusions
• Traditional ISOL method is succesfully complemented by IGISOL and gas catcher techniques
– gaining universality in RIB production
• Novel ion manipulation techniques (RFQ, charge breeding, ion traps,…) have made significant impact towards high-sensitivity and precision experiments
• Penning trap technique coupled with an ISOL method opens new opportunities for mass and spectroscopy measurements
– About 500 atomic masses measured with precision better than 10 keV– Mass derivatives can probe nuclear structure (deformation, shell gaps)– Evidence observed for the persistence of the neutron shell gap towards 78Ni
• Post-accelerated RIBs start producing physics on n-rich nuclei– Coulex and transfer reaction experiments shown feasible– Isomeric beam production demonstrated– Role of ”magic” numbers far from stability
• Results on N=20, 50 and 82 n-rich nuclei
ISOL & future: Intensity and precision frontier !
Shell Gap Energies from TheoryShell Gap Energies from Theory
M. Stoitsov, et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 132502 (2007)
HFB-THO + density functional theory
J. Pearson, S. GorielyNuclear Physics A 777(2006)623
P. Möller et al.ADNDT 59(1995)185
Fit to 2149 measured masses (AME03)