Upload
summer-sanford
View
34
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Graphite Target. beam. 1st Horn. 2nd Horn. 3rd Horn. 040823 T2K collaboration meeting. Overview of Target&Horn Activity. A.K.Ichikawa. I=320kA. Current Activity. Japanese construction group Target design : T. Nakadaira et. al Target FEM calculation : Y. Hayato et. al - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Overview of Target&Horn Activity
A.K.Ichikawa
040823 T2K collaboration meeting
1st Horn 2nd Horn 3rd Horn
Graphite Targetbeam I=320kA
Current ActivityJapanese construction group
Target design : T. Nakadaira et. al
Target FEM calculation : Y. Hayato et. al
Radiation damage study : Y. Hayato et. al
Target He cooling system : w/ Cryogenics group, IPNS, KEK
Horn conceptual design : A. K. Ichikawa et. al
Horn Cooling : H. Sato et. al
Horn expert : Y. Suzuki, Y. Yamanoi
International collaboration
US( Colorado ) (E.Zimmerman, L.Bartoszek)
Start working on design and beam MC.
RAL : possible collaboration on target and baffle starting from FEM
analysis
BNL : possible collaboration around target
50 GeV 0.75 MW beam !
cm
cm
1100o
(cf. melting point 1536o)
3.3E14 ppp w/ 5s pulse
When this beam hits an iron block,
Material heavier than iron would melt.
Thermal shock stress
(cf. 耐力 ~300 MPa)
Material heavier than Ti might be destroyed.
Cooling power and radiation shield 12GeV PS x 100
GPaTE 3
Residual dose rate
> 1000Sv/h
Stress analysis -1st horn-Most severe part will be thermal shock on the 1st horn inner-conductor.
We don’t have a satisfactory safety factor (=<25MPa) for that in case of “full”(=0.75MW
w/ 3.6sec rep. rate) beam. (Safety factor is not satisfactory but not so bad.)
But we decided that instead of a safer but less-neutrino-yielding horn, we adopt the current design at least until we get “full” beam.
30MPa
Temperature rise w/ 3.3E14 ppp
Stress analysis -2nd and 3rd horns-
900
472
2000 2500
1400
809
24MPa20MPa
Stress analysis –target-
Stress analysis for the 1 pulse T was done (and reported at the last collaboration meeting).
Full stress analysis after reaching equilibrium have not yet been done.
Thermal stress 6.8 MPa
(safety factor ~3)
One of the serious concern is whether we should divide it to pieces or not.
In case it is divided, the structure become very complicated.
Therefore, we decided to develop base design without dividing it.
Conceptual designAlmost finished.
After consideration on the stress analysis, we decided to make inner-conductors w/ 3mm-thick aluminum.
Flux generated by beam-MC w/ 3mm-thick aluminum is already distributed.
Fine tuning of the inner-conductor shape
of the 2nd and 3rd horn is on going.
(3rd horn : almost done, 2nd horn : on going.)
-> Eric’s talk.
Alignment tolerance is being studied using beam MC
-> Eric’s talk
New Flux
LOI
New flux v.s. LOI @ OAB2deg
Mainly thanks to longer DV
Horn R&D Status 1st horn1st horn prototype
Assembled into the K2K outer-conductor.
Other horn R&D status 1st horn outer conductor is being designed and will be constructed within this fiscal year.
A prototype of the 3rd horn inner conductor will be constructed within this fiscal year.
Shape of the stripline-horn coupling part is being designed.
During these designs, E.Zimmerman and L.Bartoszek is working together.
Cooling performance is investigated by H.Sato. (-> his talk)
Target R&D status
More knowledge on radiation effect -> Y. Hayato
New cooling schemes (He cooling instead of water) -> T.Nakadaira
R&D for components -> T.Nakadaira
Cost estimate Total 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Horn 2.5 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.9
1st horn R&D 0.2 0.1 0.1
2nd horn R&D 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
3rd horn R&D 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1
horns 0.6 0.2 0.4
cooling system 0.1 0.0 0.1
support structure R&D 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 -
support structure 0.4 0.1 0.3
Horn Power supply 3.0 0.5 0.8 1.6
R&D 0.5 0.5
Power supply 2.5 0.8 1.6
Target 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
R&D 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1
Target 0.1 0.1
cooling system 0.1 0.1
Baffle 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2
R&D 0.1 0.0 0.1
Baffle 0.1 0.1
cooling system 0.0 0.0
Support structure 0.1 0.1
Unit : M$