Overview of the Industrial Internet Consortium · •The Industrial Internet Consortium centralizes, leverages and catalyzes this collective, non-proprietary thinking •The IIC [s

Overview of theIndustrial Internet Consortium

Boston, MassachusettsJune 17, 2014

Agenda

2:00 Opening Comments

2:05 Introduction & Overview of the Industrial Internet Consortium

2:45 Planning for the Industrial Internet: How Advanced Software & Connected Machines will transform Industry

3:15 IIC Testbed Activities & Opportunities

3:30 Break

3:45 IIC Technology & Security Initiatives

4:05 The IIC Founders Perspective Founders AT&T, Cisco, GE, IBM & Intel

5:00 Program conclusion

2

Lynne Canavan, Sr. Program Manager, IIC

Dr. Richard Soley, Executive Director, IIC

Greg Gorbach, Vice President, Information-Driven Manufacturing, ARC Advisory Group

Dr. Shoumen Datta, SVP, IIC

Stephen Mellor, IIC CTO

Sorin Netu, AT&T; Paul Didier, Cisco; Joe Salvo, GE; Ron Ambrosio, IBM; Jeff Fedders, Intel

An Open Membership Consortium, now 56 companies strong

As of 6-17-2014

IIC Founder Companies

Agenda





3:30 Break




4







The Industrial Internet Consortium:Introduction & Overview

Richard Mark Soley, Ph.D.

Executive Director, Industrial Internet Consortium

Where We’ve Been

June 23, 2014 6

Even Robbing Banks!

June 23, 2014 7

• “Stick ‘em up!” is now:

• 9 May 2013: Gang of cyber-criminals steals US$45 million completely online• Brooklyn U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch called it "a massive 21st-

century bank heist“

• Eight members of the New York cell withdrew $2.8 million in cash from hacked accounts in less than a day

• Lynch called it a "virtual criminal flash mob.“

• "It's a really easy way to turn digits into cash," said Gartner analyst Avivah Litan

Has the Internet Changed Everything?

June 23, 2014 8

"If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.”

- General Eric Shinseki, Chief of Staff, US Army

Discrete Manufacturing

June 23, 2014 9

• In 1980 when I was building expert systems to automate the debugging of Gould Modicon 584 programmable controllers, they used ladder diagrams to program them and data was printed for hand analysis.

• In 2014, the same is true.

Energy Grids

June 23, 2014 10

• In 1950 energy grids assumed that a small number of energy “manufacturers” delivered power to a large number of users, and the grid itself was never used to transmit information (even energy usage!).

• In 2014, this is still true.

Jet Engines

June 23, 2014 11

• In 1960, the first commercial jets had performance monitoring electronics, but that information had to be downloaded essentially by hand to do any sort of benchmarking or proactive failure prediction.

• In 2013, even though performance monitoring is even more complete on engines, there is no automatic fleet management or “at the gate” data collection.

Healthcare Device Integration

June 23, 2014 12

• In 1950 the first electronic healthcare monitoring devices were difficult to integrate, leading to a painful lack of meaningful holistic monitoring (e.g., respiration/O2 sensing integration for patient monitoring).

• In 2014, a major project at Partners Healthcare/ Massachusetts General Hospital is in the experimental stages for integrating relatively simple devices.

No, the Internet Didn’t Change Everything

June 23, 2014 13

• There is much more to be done:• Oil & Gas Exploration

• Geological data integration from multiple sensing sources

• Rail & other transportation • Failure sensing and automatic rerouting of multimodal systems, far

more extensive than JapanRail automatic stop

• Smart homes & smart energy usage• And on… and on… and on…

The next revolution: An opportunity for a new wave of Industrialization/Internetization

Adopted from Industrial Internet: Pushing the Boundaries (2012, Evans & Annuziata)14

Industrial Revolution

Machines andfactories thatpower economicsof scale and scope

Wave 1

Wave 2

Wave 3

Internet Revolution

Computing power and rise of distributedInformation networks

Industrial Internet

Machine-basedanalytics: physics-based, deep domain expertise automated predictive

The Industrial Internet: Impacting 46% of the World’s GDP

15From: Industrial Internet: Pushing the Boundaries (2012, Evans & Annuziata)

1% savings from efficient Industrial Internet solutions could save billions in operational costs

$30Bfuel cost saving

in aviation industry

$66Bfuel cost saving in gas powered

fleets

$63Bproductivity

improvement in healthcare

$90Breduction in

Cap X in oil & gas exploration and development

$27Bproductivity

improvement in rail industry

* Projected savings are based on 1% efficiencies/savings

Savings and growth opportunities across every industry

Source: Industrial Internet: Pushing the Boundaries (2012, Evans & Annuziata)

The Industrial Internet: Enabled by the convergence of technology, machines, data and connectivity

Source: Cisco Systems 17

By 2020, the number of things connected to the internet will be approximately 7x the number of people on earth today.

BIL

LIO

NS

OF

DEV

ICES

TIMELINE

INFLECTION POINT

6.8 7.2 7.6

12.5

25

50 Billion“Smart Objects”

WORLD POPULATION

Rapid AdoptionRate of DigitalInfrastructure:5X Faster thanelectricity andtelephony

Big Data: The Big Enabler

• Data is now doubling approximately every 20 months• We are generating 2.5 x 1018 (exabytes) of data each day

• Stored information in the world ~ 1200 exabytes

• Opportunities for unprecedented agility, predictive analytics

• Security and privacy concerns remain high

18

The Industrial Internet: Instrumented, Connected

June 23, 201419

INSTRUMENTED INDUSTRIAL MACHINE

INDUSTRIAL DATA

SYSTEMS

PHYSICAL AND

HUMAN NETWORKS

REMOTE AND

CENTRALIZED DATA

VISUALIZATIONBIG DATA ANALYTICS

Intelligence flows

back into machinesExtraction and storage

of proprietary machine data

stream

Machine-based

algorithms and

data analysis

Data sharing with

the right people

and machines

SECURE, CLOUD-

BASED NETWORK

The challenges to realize the full potential of the Industrial Internet require a federated approach, regardless of industry

June 23, 201420

© 2014 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, Globe logo and other marks are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property.

Today’s reality: Uncoordinated, overlapping approaches are inefficient and ineffective

June 23, 201421

Industries

Big Data

Security

Academics

Government

Technology

Standards

Manufacturing

Introducing the Industrial Internet Consortium

June 23, 201422

Industries

Big Data

Security

Academics

Government

Technology

Standards

Manufacturing

Announced on March 27th by 5 Founding Companies

June 23, 201423

An Open Membership Consortium, now 56 companies strong

As of 6-17-2014

IIC Founder Companies

Why form another Consortium? Why now?

• Many organization are looking to connect the physical world with the digital worldMultiple opinions on how to do itNo common approachRecognition that consumer IoT has different requirements

• The Industrial Internet Consortium centralizes, leverages and catalyzes this collective, non-proprietary thinking

• The IIC’s public-private partnership will result in new frameworks, interoperability and technologies that enable organizations to more easily connect and optimize assets and operations to drive unprecedented agility in every industrial sector

• The IIC organizes standards, open source, commercial/ government/academic research and testbeds in order to rapidly deliver new products & services

What we do

26

TestbedsInnovation to drive new

products, processes, services

Technology & SecurityArchitectural frameworks, interoperability, privacy &

security of Big Data

Thought LeadershipCommunity to advance innovation,

best practices and insights

The goal of the IIC is to improve integration of the physical and digital worlds, to help drive adoption of Industrial Internet applications.

The IIC and Standards

June 23, 201427

• The IIC is not a standards organization

• The IIC evaluates and organizes existing standards. The

IIC will influence the global standards development

process for Internet and industrial systems

o Advocating for open standard technologies in order to

ease the deployment of connected technologies

• Very active Technology Working Group

o Meets weekly

o Is currently identifying requirements for open

interoperability standards to influence the global

development standards process for internet and industrial

systems

o Goal is reduce duplication of effort and identify if there is

something out there that will meet the rigorous

requirements

June 23, 2014Content restricted to IIC Members only - not for External

Publication

IIC Steering Committee

TechnologyWorking Group

MarketingWorking Group

MembershipWorking Group

Security Working Group

LegalWorking Group

TestbedsWorking Group

FrameworkUse Cases

ThoughtLeadership

CommunicationsPositioning &Messaging Vocabulary

How we’re organized

IIC Staff

IIC Working Groups

• Working Groups have individual charters and ambitious agendas

• Only IIC members can participate and vote in the IIC Working Groups

• Members have unlimited participation; there is a one vote, one company rule

June 23, 201429

The majority of the IIC work gets done on Working Groups. Member

companies gain exposure to new ideas, developments and

deliverables through these workstreams.

How your company can participate

• Become a member

• Join in the working groups and make your voice heard

oGet a seat at the table to influence the requirements development, technology adoption, and future direction of the Industrial Internet

• Network with IIC members to create and develop critical collaborations to benefit your company

• Participate in selected research projects and testbeds • Become eligible to run for a seat on the IIC Steering

Committee

June 23, 201430

The Future: Jet Engines

June 23, 2014 31

How will we reduce jet engine failure and maintenance costs?

The Future: Healthcare

June 23, 2014 32

How will we save lives by integrating medical devices?

The Future: Financial System Risk

June 23, 2014 33

How will we sense a recurrence of September 2008, October 1987, November 1929?

There’s a Pattern

June 23, 2014 34

Sense… potentially planet wide.

Integrate sensor data.

Real-time, predictive analytics based on benchmark data.

Deliver visualization and decision support to policy makers.

Q&A

35

• Richard Soley, Executive Director ([email protected])

• Lynne Canavan, Senior Program Manager ([email protected])

[email protected]+1-781-444 0404

Agenda





3:30 Break




36







Agenda





3:30 Break




37







Testbeds & the IIC

Dr. Shoumen DattaSenior Vice President

Industrial Internet Consortium

IIC Testbeds

39

Room 110

40NIST Workshop at CMU on June 13, 2014 – Group in Rm 110 – Team Lead: Kevin Stanton, Intel – Team Scribe: Stefanno Ruffini, Ericsson

NSF Funded Grand ChallengeAnnounced on June 13, 2014

41

IIC Testbeds

42

• Differentiate by Duration

• Differentiate by Funding

• Ecosystem Partners

• Testbed Steps

IIC Testbed - Differentiate by Duration

43

• Long Term • Medium Term

• Short Term • Plug Fest


44


• Short Term • Plug FestPlug-n-Play (PnP)

Attach widgets, modules, interfaces

Create functions using existing tools

Industry funded



• Short TermCollaboration/convergence to create use cases

Substantiate new use cases using existing tools

Demonstrate functionality / testability

Productize / monetize ?

Industry funded

• Plug FestPlug-n-Play (PnP)



Industry funded


• Long Term • Medium TermDevelop test bed to generate new use cases

Collaborate to contribute existing tools / kits

Collaborate to generate new tools / kits

Deploy (real time / run time) / test

Path to productization ?

Funding open to government and/or industry





Industry funded




Industry funded


• Long TermExploration of fundamental principles

Potential for innovation and/or disruption

Experimental test bed / develop new functions

Solution to problems with major impact

Creates jobs and improves economic growth

Funds from government (+/-) industry support

• Medium TermDevelop test bed to generate new use cases

Collaborate to contribute existing tools / kits

Collaborate to generate new tools / kits

Deploy (real time / run time) / test

Path to productization ?

Funding open to government and/or industry








IIC Testbeds

48




• Testbed Steps

IIC Testbed – Differentiate by Funding

49

• Government FundingAcademic PI lead + industry sub-contractors

Fundamental principles + transition to practice

Medium (1-2 years) to long term (3-5 years)

Open test beds + non-proprietary outcomes

Potential for multiple use cases and projects

Industry take-away leads to new products

• Gov-Industry FundingGovernment requires matching funding

Government + industry mixed funding

Government contributes funding

Industry contributes HR + in-kind

• Industry FundingVarious companies combine to fund test bed

Industry retains rights to intellectual property

Direct path to new products and services

• Non-US Gov FundingEU Horizon 2020

Japan - METI

Germany - Industrie 4.0

Collaborators – academic + corporations

Country of origin of applicants to match funds

For example… US Government Funding FY 2014

50

NSF 1,227.4

DOD 881.5

DOE 541.2

NIH 526.7

DARPA 418.6

NIST 143.7

DHS 76.5

NASA 76.4

NOAA 26.1

AHRQ 25.6

NNSA 17.0

EPA 6.0

DOT 1.5

IIC Testbeds

51




• Testbed Steps

Ecosystem Funding Partners

52

Academic liaison catalytic to gov funding. OSTP may be an influencer. NIST umbrella is key to tech standards.Inclusion of national laboratories as partners may help gain access to new technologies and improve funding.

Ecosystem - Academic Partners

53

Ecosystem - National Agencies

IIC Testbeds

55




• Testbed Steps

Testbed Proposal Steps

56

Prior to funding application – TBD – Test Bed Location

•Political Value•Commercial Value•Partner Preferences•Assembly & Integration•Showcase and public relations

Test Bed Proposal – Overall Steps

• Plan scenario – collaborators, components, connectivity• II-IoT-CPS integration issues – divergence / convergence • Architecture – common reference model / configuration• Stack (Data)• Analytics• Evaluation • Economic Impact• Complete Proposal•Submission for funding

In Summary…

Testbeds are a critical deliverable of the IIC.

Our priorities are to:

• Identify and collate proposals

• Identify interested partners

• Obtain funding from government and industry

• Publicize results to maximize reuse of investment

June 23, 201457

Dr Shoumen Datta

Agenda





3:30 Break




59







IIC Technology & Security Initiatives

Stephen MellorCTO, Industrial Internet Consortium

June 23, 2014

IIC Steering Committee

TechnologyWorking Group

MarketingWorking Group

MembershipWorking Group


LegalWorking Group

TestbedsWorking Group

FrameworkUse Cases

ThoughtLeadership

CommunicationsPositioning &Messaging Vocabulary

Technology, Security & Testbeds

IIC Staff

Technology Working Group

To date, this group has:

Constructed a Charter

Defined deliverables that support the charter

Determined dependencies between the deliverables

62

Charter: Define and develop common architectures, by selecting from standards available to all, from open, neutral, international, consensus organizations and reviewing relevant technologies that comprise the ecosystems that will make the industrial internet work.

Dependencies

63

10. Glossary

3. Identify

elements

5. Identify

technology(s)

4. Reference

architecture(s)

6. Evaluate

technology(s)

9. Reference testbed

requirements

2. Framework

1. Use cases 8.

Recommend adoptions

7. Identify

gaps

Sample Use Cases currently under development

• UC001: Advanced Manufacturing and Field Servicing Thereof

• UC002: Identity and Credential Lifecycle

• UC003: Distributed Autonomy in the Power Grid

• UC004: General Security Use Cases

• UC005: Web Application Developer

• UC006: Component Pedigree and Chain of Title

• UC007: A Use Case Concerning IoT Device Management

• UC008: Data Management

64

IIC Working Groups meet frequently to establish requirements and identify gaps in the use cases, which include:

https://www.omgwiki.org/iic-members/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=technology:uc001_factory_field_service_use_case.pdf

https://www.omgwiki.org/iic-members/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=technology:uc002_identity_and_credential_lifecycle.pdf

https://www.omgwiki.org/iic-members/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=technology:uc003_distributed_autonomy_in_the_power_grid.pdf

https://www.omgwiki.org/iic-members/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=technology:uc004-smartgrid-general_security_usecase_v1.1.docx

https://www.omgwiki.org/iic-members/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=technology:uc005_web_application_developer_use_case.docx

https://www.omgwiki.org/iic-members/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=use_cases:20140512_-_use_case_for_iic_-_component_pedigree.pdf

https://www.omgwiki.org/iic-members/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=technology:uc007_a_us_case_concerning_iot_device_management.pdf

https://www.omgwiki.org/iic-members/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=use_cases:uc008_data_management.docx

Every IIC Use Case follows a template

65

UC001

Framework

The Framework Team meets weekly to:

• Draft an architectural framework

• Establish an approach to maintain and manage it over time

• Work with others to reduce duplication and maximize commonality

66

Physical Systems

Sensors & Actuators

Edge Aggregation, Analytic & Control

Device Management

Data Service

Analytic Service

Application & Integration

Business Systems

Soft

war

e D

efin

ed In

fras

tru

ctu

re

Co

nn

ecti

vity

Man

agea

bili

ty

Tru

st &

Sec

uri

ty

Inte

rop

erab

ility

Vocabulary

June 23, 2014 67

The Vocabulary Team has established a draft process that:

• Identifies terms

• Defines them

• Reduces duplication and maximizes commonality with other groups

• Ensures terms are used consistently

IIC Boston 18-19 June, 2014

Glossary Development

Tool Other IIC TeamsGlossary TeamDocument Team

Author

Document

Initial

Identification

of Terms and

DefinitionsCovert for

Tool based

Compare

Send

Review and

Prepare

Updates

Change

Recommen-

dations

Prepare

Send

Review and

Adopt

Existing

Terms

Publish

Update Lists

Final Review

& Term

Acceptance

Updates

Perform

Document

Crawl for

Terms

Generate

Initial

Mapping to

Existing

terms

Generate

Review

Terminology

results

For Review

Publish

Documents

and Models


68

3. Identify

elements

5. Identify

technology(s)

4. Reference

architecture(s)

2. Framework

1. Use cases 7.

Identify gaps

10. Glossary Must be consistent

• Examines each use case forSecurity issues

• Has additional,general use cases

• Works closely with Framework team• Will ensure Security considered from

the outset and pervasively• Meets separately to consider Security

issues for a separate “pair of eyes”

Reference Architectures

6969

10. Glossary

3. Identify

elements

5. Identify

technology(s)

4. Reference

architecture(s)

6. Evaluate

technology(s)

9. Reference testbed

requirements

2. Framework

1. Use cases 8.

Recommend adoptions

7. Identify

gaps

Q&A

June 23, 2014 70

• Contact • Stephen Mellor, Chief Technology Officer ([email protected])

www.iiconsortium.org

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.iiconsortium.org/

Agenda





3:30 Break



5:00 Program conclusion 71







IIC Founders – A Panel Discussion

72

Paul DidierSolutions Architect Manager,Internet of Things Group

Dr. Joseph SalvoDirector of the Industrial Internet Consortium

Ron AmbrosioDistinguished Engineer,CTO, IBM Smarter Energy Research

Sorin NetuLead Product Development Manager

Jeff FeddersChief Strategist

73

www.iiconsortium.org