11
P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA worksh op 1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

  • View
    234

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 1

Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling

Peter Gorham

University of Hawaii at Manoa

Page 2: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 2

SalSA antenna requirements

Must fit down a borehole, between 2 and at most 4.5 to 5” diameter

Must pass tension member through its center (clamp on or integral)

Dual polarization a high priority (linear polarizations seem like the best bet for bandwidth)

Should be fully compensated for lithostatic pressure

Wide bandwidth: 100% or more single-mode if possible

Easy to make, low cost, no integral electronics

Page 3: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 3

Antenna test & modeling

UH SalSA group has dedicated anechoic chamber 14’ by 10’ by 24’, good 100-20,000 MHzFoundation slab can support large salt stack for embedded antenna testsTest equipment: time domain response to ~10ps; spectral analysis to 20 GHz

Antenna modeling:NEC2, NEC2_salt (embedded dieletric version): Beam patterns, impedanceXFDTD (commercial package): time domain response

Page 4: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 4

Dual polarization Antenna studies

Vertical polarization is easy

“Fat” dipoles are excellent for this

Horizontal polarization is tough in a narrow boreholeUse complementary slot antenna, but matching the vertical is difficultBest solution: probably adjacent (but separate) antennas

Test data

Page 5: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 5

Fat dipole results in salt

4” diameter by 30 inch length, copperUsable from 50MHz to 1 GHz (better than model predicts)Single mode from 50-350MHz

120 MHz

370 MHz

180 MHz

530 MHz

Frequency, Hz/MHz

SWR (predicted)

SWR (measured)

Gain, dB

50 ohmfeedpointcoupling

Page 6: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 6

Finite difference time domain, slot-cylinder

reference antenna with parameters:cylinder length = 81.5 cmcylinder radius = 5.1 cmslot width = 30 mmslot length = 68 cmplaced in air space without HDPE

Page 7: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 7

Slot-cylinder in salt and air

Dramatic effects when immersed in salt, but surprisingly, HDPE core gives best bandwidth

SWRs at R = 150

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

201.

50E

+08

2.04

E+

08

2.59

E+

08

3.13

E+

08

3.67

E+

08

4.22

E+

08

4.76

E+

08

5.30

E+

08

5.84

E+

08

6.39

E+

08

6.93

E+

08

7.47

E+

08

8.01

E+

08

8.56

E+

08

9.10

E+

08

9.64

E+

08

Frequency

SW

Rs

filled with air, in air

filled with HDPE, in air

filled with salt, in salt

filled with HDPE, in salt

Page 8: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 8

More slot-cylinder in salt

50 ohms impedance match in salt is tolerable, probably even better with HDPE core.

slot37.id -- cylinder length = 81.5 cm, cylinder radius = 5.1 cm, slot width = 15 mm, slot length = 79 cm

02

468

10

121416

1820

1.00

E+

08

1.46

E+

08

1.92

E+

08

2.38

E+

08

2.84

E+

08

3.30

E+

08

3.76

E+

08

4.22

E+

08

4.68

E+

08

5.14

E+

08

5.60

E+

08

6.06

E+

08

6.52

E+

08

6.98

E+

08

7.44

E+

08

7.90

E+

08

8.36

E+

08

8.81

E+

08

9.27

E+

08

9.73

E+

08

Frequency

SW

Rs R = 50

R = 100

R = 150

Page 9: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 9

Slot-cylinder Antennas

Best response at feedpoint impedance of about 150 to 200 ohms, need 3:1 or 4:1 transformer balun

Antenna model shows good efficiency from 175 MHz up to more than 700 MHz

But: very sensitive to diameter--this assumes about a 4 inch borehole or more

Page 10: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 10

Slot-cylinder predicted beam patterns

Antenna is single-mode from 180-280MHz, goes multi-mode after that2-3dB of front-to-back asymmetry favoring the side with slot

180 MHz 210 MHz 280 MHz

330 MHzantenna

Page 11: P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop1 Saltdome Shower Array: Antennas & Antenna Modeling Peter Gorham University of Hawaii at Manoa

P. Gorham, SLAC SalSA workshop 11

Summary

4 inch diameter dipole and slot-cylinder antennas look good

Dipole ~80cm high, good Vpol single-mode response from <100-350MHzSlot-cylinder of order same length will get good 180-300 MHz Hpol single-mode, but with ~few dB front-to-back directionalityPolarization separation for both is outstanding (-20dB cross-pol at all angles)

Helical antennas investigated but do not provide clean polarization separation

Become elliptically polarized at off-principal axesBandwidths relatively narrow

Combination of fat dipoles and slot-cylinders seems a viable configuration for SalSA