P1... · Ellison Fold Way, Blackburn Phase 2 Geo-Environmental Investigation, Risk Assessment and Remediation Strategy The LK Group ii December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374 LK Consult Document

ELLISON FOLD WAY

BLACKBURN

PHASE 2 GEO- ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION, RISK

ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION STRATEGY

Job Number: LKC 19 1374 Date: December 2019 Client: Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council

Ellison Fold Way, Blackburn Phase 2 Geo-Environmental Investigation, Risk Assessment and Remediation Strategy

The LK Group ii December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

LK Consult

Document Verification

Site Address Ellison Fold Way, Darwen, Blackburn, BB3 3GZ

Report Title Phase 2 Geo-Environmental Investigation, Risk Assessment and Remediation Strategy

Job Number LKC 19 1374 Document Ref. CL-602-LKC 19 1374-02

Date Issued December 2019 Report Version R0

Prepared By Peter Dunn Signatures

Reviewed By Colin Crompton Signature

Revision Record

Revision No. Date Nature of Revision Approved By

DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by LK Consult (LKC) who have exercised such professional skill, care and diligence as may reasonably be expected of a properly qualified and competent consultant, experienced in preparing reports of a similar scope. However, to the extent that the report is based or relies upon information contained in records, reports or other materials provided to LKC, which have not been independently produced or verified, LKC gives no warranty, representation or assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. This report is issued on the condition that LKC will not be held liable for any loss arising from ground conditions between sampling points (i.e. boreholes/trial pits/hand augers/surface samples) which have not been shown by the sampling points or related testing carried out during the investigation, nor for any loss arising from conditions below the maximum depth of the investigation. Opinions on such conditions, where given, are for general guidance only. This report is prepared solely for the benefit of Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council. It may not be relied upon by, or submitted to a third party for their reliance for the purposes of valuation, mortgage, insurance and regulatory approval, until all invoices have been settled in full. Those using this information in subsequent assessments or evaluations do so at their own risk.


The LK Group iii December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Site Details Site Location: The site is located either side of the newly constructed Ellison Fold Way, centred at

approximate National Grid Reference 370195E 422280N. Site Area: 30,500m2.

Current Land Use:

The site is split into three areas (A, B and C) as follows: Area A is located to the west of Ellison Fold Way, east of Ely Close. Area B is located to the east of Ellison Fold Way, opposite area A, and north

of Tower View. Area C is also located to the east of Ellison Fold Way, north of Area B and

south of Ellison Fold Lane. Proposed Development:

To be confirmed. For the purposes of this assessment, it is assumed to comprise low rise houses with private gardens.

Purpose of Report: Contamination and Geotechnical Assessment. Preliminary Risk Assessment PRA Details: Undertaken by Envirotech (Ref: ESS/EFW/P1DS, dated 8th May 2019).

History: All three sites have remained largely unchanged from the 1850’s through to present day with the construction of Ellison Fold Way. This road construction has disturbed the ground in both Marsh House A and Marsh House B.

Geology / Hydrogeology: Glacial Till over Pennine Lower Coal Measures (Secondary A Aquifer).

Preliminary Conceptual Model: Negligible to High to risk for identified Pollutant Linkages.

Coal Mining Site lies within a Development High Risk Area for Coal Mining. Recommendations: Site Investigation was recommended.

Ground Investigation Work Undertaken Date of Investigation: 10th-14th September 2019

Intrusive Investigation Work Undertaken:

12no. window sample boreholes (WS101-WS112). 17no. mechanically excavated trial pits (TP101-TP117). 3no. rotary boreholes (RBHA-C)

Monitoring Wells: Installed in all window sample boreholes.

Soil Sampling: 26no. samples tested for metals, speciated PAHs, pH, sulphate, asbestos and SOM. 16no. samples tested for suite above plus TPHCWG & BTEX.

Groundwater Sampling: 7no samples tested for metals, speciated PAHs, cyanide, pH, sulphate, hardness, phenol, TPHCWG and BTEX.

Monitoring: 6no. gas monitoring visit undertaken. Insitu and Laboratory Geotechnical Testing: SPTs, shear vanes, pocket penetrometers, PSDs, plasticity, triaxial, BRE SD1.


The LK Group iv December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

Ground Conditions and Geotechnical Assessment

Proposed Development Development of the site for residential end use.

General Ground conditions / Geotechnical Testing

Typically Topsoil / Made Ground topsoil over soft to firm, becoming stiff and very stiff variably sandy gravelly CLAY at the locations of Area A and C. Area B comprises interbedded cohesive and granular deposits.

Bedrock comprising Sandstone and Mudstone was encountered across the site. Mudstone was encountered in the far north-east, north-west and south-west corners of the site, Sandstone was encountered across the majority of the site.

Maximum investigation depth 6.35mbgl within the window sample probeholes and 30.0mbgl within the rotary boreholes.

Made Ground generally <0.5m in thickness, exception to this is at the location of TP104 where Made Ground in excess of 4mbgl was encountered.

Variably silty, sandy, gravelly CLAY to 1.30-5.20mbgl. Bedrock encountered at depths of between 1.30m and 2.80mbgl within the eastern section of Site C.

Groundwater encountered at varying depths, typically within granular deposits. The groundwater is considered representative of perched water pockets.

Allowable Bearing Pressure

82kN/m2 at 1.0-1.2mbgl Area A. 103kN/m2 at 1.0-1.2mbgl Area C. Variable within Area B.

Anticipated Foundation Type

Traditional shallow foundations recommended from approximately 1mbgl within Area A & C. If soft ground is encountered, foundations may need to be deepened / widened or ground replaced with compacted granular material.

Ground improvement by vibro granular columns supporting shallow strip foundations within Area B.

Shallow Groundwater Shallow groundwater identified on the site is considered representative of perched water and may present a constraint to the development.

Suitable drainage should be considered in the proposed development layout. Concrete Requirements Based on BRE Digest 20051 – DS-1 AC-1 recommended.

Coal Mining The site is located within a Development High Risk Area and will require a CMRA to support any future planning applications.

Temporary support of excavation

Trial pits within the cohesive deposits were recorded as stable. Trial pits within granular deposits were recorded as varying between stable and unstable and therefore it is recommended that all excavations where granular strata is encountered is supported or battered back in accordance with guidance contained in CIRIA R97.

Plasticity

Consideration will need to be given to the shrink / swell of the clay strata if it is to be used as founding strata, particularly where trees/hedges are present. Foundations may need to be deepened. A low to medium volume change potential has been calculated for the site.

Road / Pavement Design

Initially a design CBR value of 4% should be adopted for the site. On approval of a site development plan, in-situ testing of proposed access routes should be undertaken to obtain a more applicable CBR value.

1 BRE (2005).”Concrete in Aggressive Ground.” Special Digest 1.


The LK Group v December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

Contamination Risk Assessment The table below shows a summary of the risk assessments for Areas A, B and C undertaken for each pollutant linkage, the revised conceptual model and recommendation for either remediation and / or further investigation.

Pollutant Linkage Risk Recommendations

1

Contaminants posing a risk to future site users via dermal contact, ingestion and inhalation (of soil, dust, fibres and vegetables).

Moderate/ Low (metals,

PAHs)

Occasional elevated concentrations identified. Statistical analysis indicates soil is ‘suitable for use’.

Low risk considered appropriate. Recommendation: No specific remediation required, although a watching brief should be maintained during earthworks (see Section 9).

Low (ACM,

hydrocarbons)

No ACM identified. No evidence of hydrocarbons identified. Recommendation: No remediation required*1.

2 Volatile contaminants posing a risk to future site users via the inhalation of vapours.

Low

No elevated volatile contaminants encountered on the site.

Recommendation: No remediation required.

3

Gas posing a risk to buildings and future site users via the migration of gas into building causing explosion and asphyxiation.

High (Area A)

Elevated CH4 and CO2 identified with significant flow readings also measured.

Max GSV of 1.91/hr classified as CS3. Recommendation: Gas protection measures in line with CS3 recommended.

High (Area B, C)


Max GSV of 0.34l/hr classified as CS2. Recommendation: Gas protection measures in line with CS2 recommended.

4 Mobile contamination posing a risk to controlled waters via the migration through permeable strata.

Low

No significant elevated concentrations of contaminants identified.

Shallow geology will also impede lateral migration.


5 Sulphate posing a risk to building via direct contact (sulphate attack). Low

No significantly elevated SO4 or low pH. Recommendation: DS1 AC1 considered appropriate subject to assessment by structural engineer.

6 Organic contaminants posing a risk to water pipes. Low

Elevated contaminants of concern in localised areas of made ground / topsoil at shallow depth.

Pipeline likely to be laid into natural strata (0.75-1.35m).

Recommendation: Barrier pipe unlikely to be required – subject to UURA.

7 Phytotoxic metals posing a risk to flora via root uptake. Very Low

No elevated contaminants identified. Recommendation: No remediation required.


The LK Group vi December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

Recommendations and Remedial Strategy The table below shows the remediation and validation requirements for Areas A, B and C of the site. This information should be documented in a Site Completion Report for submission to the local authority.

Phase PL Remediation Requirements Validation Requirements

Pre-

Cons

truc

tion

ALL

Earthworks Inspections / Unexpected Contamination Areas A, B, C The relevant contractors should be briefed that during development works at the site should any unusual ground conditions and / or visual or olfactory evidence of contamination (including asbestos containing material) be encountered at the site, LKC and the Local Authority should be informed, and further assessment of the material may be required. Should asbestos be identified during groundworks, precautions should be taken to ensure the safety of the construction workers and nearby land users. It would be advisable to introduce an asbestos management strategy in line with CIRIA C7332.

Log of work undertaken including photographs. Details of any sampling undertaken and validation of any potential additional remedial work.

3

Gas Protection Measures Area A - In line with CS3 as per UK guidance3,4. Areas - B, C - In line with CS2 as per UK guidance. Gas protection measures should include the following measures to attain the correct gas protection scores:

Passive subfloor or active subfloor ventilation system.

Methane and carbon dioxide resistant membrane installed as per manufacturer’s instructions.

Ventilation of confined spaces within the building. Well-constructed reinforced suspended, raft or cast

in situ ground slab. Minimum penetration of ground slab by services. All joints and penetrations to be sealed.

It may be advisable to undertake a cost benefit analysis to establish the most cost effected solution. The following

Supply and review of foundation designs. Photographic evidence of sub-floor void, ventilation and suitably sealed gas membrane. Validation of gas protection measures should be in line with CIRIA 7355

6 Potable Water Pipes Areas A, B & C It is recommended that a Water Pipeline Assessment is undertaken once the location and depth of potable water pipes are known.

Delivery Notes of Pipe Material. Photographs of the Installed Pipe.

1, 2, 4, 5, 7

Areas A, B & C No remediation anticipated with respect to PL1 (direct contact), PL2 (inhalation of vapours), PL4 (controlled waters), PL5 (concrete), and PL7 (phytotoxicity); however, this needs to be confirmed once additional work has been completed.

2 CIRIA (2014). “Asbestos in Soil and Made Ground: A Guide to Understanding and Managing Risks”. C733. 3 CIRIA (2007). “Assessing Risks Posed by Hazardous Ground Gases to Buildings.” CIRIA C665 4 BSI (2015). “Code of Practice for the Design of Protective Measures for Methane and Carbon Dioxide Ground Gases for new buildings.” BS8485:2015. 5 CIRIA (2014). “Good Practice on the Testing and Verification of Protection Systems for Building Against Hazardous Ground Gas”. CIRIA C735.


The LK Group vii December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

The remediation recommended in the table above should be validated to ensure it has been carried out appropriately. This should be documented in a Completion/Validation Report and submitted to the local authority for completion. In addition to the above remediation, it is recommended that a full coal mining risk assessment is undertaken on the site. Voids and broken drilling was encountered in rotary boreholes undertaken as part of this investigation.


The LK Group viii December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... iii

1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1

Background ......................................................................................................... 1

Site Details .......................................................................................................... 1

2 Previous Work ............................................................................................................ 2

Summary of Existing Information ......................................................................... 2

Site History .......................................................................................................... 2

Environmental Setting ......................................................................................... 3

Site Reconnaissance........................................................................................... 4

Contamination Sources / Pathways and Receptors ............................................. 4

LKC Preliminary Contamination Conceptual Model ............................................. 5

Recommendations .............................................................................................. 6

3 Ground Investigation ................................................................................................. 8

Site Investigation Design and Methodology ......................................................... 8

Well Installations ................................................................................................. 9

Sampling Protocol ............................................................................................... 9

Gas Monitoring .................................................................................................. 10

Geotechnical Testing ......................................................................................... 11

4 Ground Conditions ................................................................................................... 13

Geology – Generalised Sequence ..................................................................... 13

Groundwater ..................................................................................................... 14

In-Situ Geotechnical Testing ............................................................................. 15

Geotechnical Laboratory Testing ....................................................................... 16

5 Geotechnical Assessment ....................................................................................... 18

Proposed Development ..................................................................................... 18

Summary of Ground Conditions ........................................................................ 18

Site Preparation ................................................................................................ 18

Foundation Conditions and Bearing Capacity .................................................... 18

Area A ............................................................................................................... 20

Area B ............................................................................................................... 21

Area C ............................................................................................................... 21

Ground Floor Slabs ........................................................................................... 22

Pavement Construction ..................................................................................... 22

Drainage ........................................................................................................... 23

Concrete Durability ............................................................................................ 23


The LK Group ix December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

Excavations ....................................................................................................... 23

Minerals ............................................................................................................ 23

Further Works ................................................................................................... 24

Construction Activity and Inspection .................................................................. 24

6 Generic Risk Assessment ....................................................................................... 25

Introduction ....................................................................................................... 25

Soil Risk Assessment ........................................................................................ 25

Gas Risk Assessment ....................................................................................... 31

Controlled Water Assessment ........................................................................... 33

Additional Risk Assessments ............................................................................ 35

Revised Contamination Conceptual Model ........................................................ 35

7 Waste Disposal Assessment ................................................................................... 39

8 Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 40

Geotechnical ..................................................................................................... 40

Contamination Assessment ............................................................................... 41

9 Recommendations and Remedial Strategy ............................................................ 42

Remediation and Validation Recommendations ................................................ 42

Other Considerations ........................................................................................ 43

Validation of Subsoil / Topsoil ........................................................................... 44

Site Completion Report ..................................................................................... 44

FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location Plan Figure 2: Site Boundary Plan

Figure 3: Site Investigation Location Plan

APPENDICES Appendix A: Risk Matrix Appendix B: Profile Logs Appendix C: Certificate of Analysis - Soil Appendix D: Certificate of Analysis - Water Appendix E: Gas Monitoring Results Appendix F: Certificate of Analysis - Geotechnical Appendix G: Statistical Output Sheets Appendix H: Hazard Index Output Sheets Appendix I: Waste Classification Sheets


The LK Group 1 December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

1 Introduction

Background LK Consult Ltd (LKC) has been commissioned by Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council to carry out a Phase 2 Geo-Environmental Investigation, Risk Assessment, Coal Mining Risk Assessment and Remediation Strategy for Ellison Fold Way, Blackburn. The investigation was undertaken in support of a future planning application to develop the site for residential use. The following work has previously been undertaken:

Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA) report, undertaken by Envirotech (Ref: ESS/EFW/P1DS, dated 8th May 2019).

This investigation has been undertaken to confirm the ground conditions below the site and to allow a contamination and geotechnical assessment to be undertaken. The aims of this report are also to establish the feasibility of developing this site, to demonstrate to the Local Planning Authority that in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)6 the site may be developed for a residential end use and that appropriate site investigation and risk assessment works are in place to allow conditional approval of any future planning application.

Site Details A summary of the site details is presented in Table 1-1. Figures 1 and 2 indicate the site location and boundary.

Location

The site is located either side of the newly constructed Ellison Fold Way, centred at approximate National Grid Reference 370195E 422280N. The site is split into three areas (A, B and C) as follows:

Area A is located to the west of Ellison Fold Way, east of Ely Close. Area B is located to the east of Ellison Fold Way, opposite area A, and

north of Tower View. Area C is also located to the east of Ellison Fold Way, north of Area B and

south of Ellison Fold Lane. Area 30,500m2.

Topography 200-225 metres above ordnance datum (AOD). The whole site slopes downwards to the west. Area A is at a lower elevation to Areas B and C.

Land Use

Site All three areas currently comprise undeveloped grassland. Surrounding Area The surrounding area mainly comprises residential properties.

Proposed Development

To be confirmed. For the purposes of this assessment, it is assumed to comprise low rise houses with private gardens.

Table 1-1: Summary of site details.

6 DCL (2019). “National Planning Policy Framework.” Department of Communities and Local Government.



2 Previous Work

Summary of Existing Information A PRA report (Ref: ESS/EFW/P1DS, dated 8th May 2019) has previously been undertaken by Envirotec Site Service Ltd and is summarised in Section 2.2-2.6. The conceptual model (Section 2.6) has been updated to be in line with LKC current risk assessment methodology.

Site History All three areas of the site have been unoccupied and used for grazing farmland since 1890. No development has been identified on historical mapping. The history of the surrounding area is taken from the Envirotec Site Service Ltd is summarised in Table 2-1.

Map Dates Descriptions Comments

1849 Agriculture

- All three areas are surrounded by farmland with a number of derelict coal pits located to the north and east of the Lisbon Drive area and south and west of the Marsh House areas.

- A few residential properties are located around 300m north west of the site.

1900 Expansion

- The town of Darwen to the west has undergone significant expansion. Residential properties are now apparent against Area A’s western boundary.

- Much of coal mining has now ceased. - Marsh House Mill and associated reservoirs located to the southern

side of Marsh House Lane. - Some excavations (possibly clay pits) are located immediately

north and east of the Lisbon Drive area.

1950s Residential Expansion

- Significant post-war residential expansion to the south of Lisbon Drive and east of march House B.

- A tank is located 100m north-east of the Lisbon Drive area. - Premier Mill is now located around 250m south-west of the site. - A large brickwork is located 100m north west.

1975 Residential Expansion

- Residential expansion has occurred to the west and south of Marsh House A.

- A number of mills are located 250m west of Marsh House A and a large undisclosed works is located around 400m northwest.

2019 Ellison Fold Way

- Although not shown in historical mapping it’s apparent that Ellison Fold Way has now been constructed running between Marsh House A and Marsh House B linking Marsh House Lane and Ellison Fold Lane.

Table 2-1: Summary of significant historical features.



Environmental Setting The environmental setting across the three areas as a whole has been taken from the Envirotec Site Service Ltd report and is summarised in Table 2-2.

Categories Details

Geology

Artificial - None recorded on site. Superficial - Till, Devensian.

Bedrock

- Superficial deposits consisting of Devensian Till are likely to be located under Marsh House A and B but not under Lisbon Drive Area C.

- Bedrock will consist of Mudstone, Siltstone and Sandstone belonging to the Pennine Lower Coal Measure Formation and sandstone of the Helpet Edge Rock formation.

- There are two faults passing through Marsh House A and B. Three faults are shown passing through Lisbon Drive.

- A Coal Seam is shown passing through the Lisbon Drive area and Marsh House B.

BGS logs - No relevant boreholes within 500m of the site.

Hydro-geology

Aquifer Designation

Superficial - Superficial Aquifer – Undifferentiated. Bedrock - Secondary A.

Source Protection Zone (SPZ) - Site is not within an SPZ. Groundwater Abstractions - None within 500m.

Hydrology

Nearest Surface Water - Small culvert / drain 244m NW of site.

Discharge Consent - Nearest 296m W: Operated by ‘United Utilities’ for storm sewage overflow.

Pollution Incidents - Most recent pollution incident: 479m S, 199, no details are provided.

Minerals / Mining

Coal Mining Development High Risk Area (DHRA) - Located within DHRA.

Coal Report

- Likely zone of influence from workings in 2 seams of coal at 110-170m depth, last worked 1913.

- Coal believed to be at or close to the surface, which may have been worked in the past.

- 13 known coal mine entries within, or within 20m of, the boundary of the property.

- Property is not within, or within 200m of, the boundary of an opencast site from which coal has been removed by open cast methods.

- No recorded of mine gas emissions requiring action.

- Not received a damage notice or claim for the subject property, or any property within 50m, since 1at January 1984.

Surface Extractions - 3 mineral extraction sites within 500m of the site.

Nearest: 60m E, Brandwood’s Colliery, ceased underground mine. Operation dates not supplied.

Cheshire Brine Compensation District - Not within site area.

Table 2-2: Summary of the environmental setting.



Categories Details

Ground Stability1 (on-site)

Collapsible Ground - Very low hazard. Compressible Ground - No hazard. Landslide - Low to very low hazard. Running Sand - Very low to no hazard. Shrinking / Swelling Clay - Very low to no hazard. Ground Dissolution - No hazard.

Landfill sites

Known/Registered - None within 250m: - Nearest 466m S - Operated by Blackburn Borough

Council for inert waste.

Potential - Areas of potentially infilled ground within 100m of

the site include infilled quarries, clay pits located adjacent to the Lisbon Drive area, 44m SW of Marsh House A and 88m NW of Lisbon Drive.

Radon - Probability of <1% of homes above Action Level. No further action required.

Designated Sites - None within 1km of site.

Contemporary Trade Directory

- None recorded on site. - Surrounding potentially contaminative sites in the

area relate to: laundrette, garage services, rubber and plastic manufacturers, seating manufacturers, furniture manufacturers.

UXO risk - Low risk. Table 2-2 (cont.): Summary of the environmental setting.

Site Reconnaissance A site walkover was completed by Envirotec Site Services Ltd as part of the Phase 1 desk study and is summarised below:

All three site areas are currently occupied by undeveloped grassland. No visual evidence of contamination or significant fly-tipping.

Contamination Sources / Pathways and Receptors Potential contamination sources for all three areas are detailed in Table 2-3.

Source Contaminants

Onsite Made Ground

- Ash and clinker (e.g. from hearths and boilers, often historically used for site raising / levelling): Heavy metals, sulphates and PAHs.

- Asbestos containing material. - If significant depth of organic / putrescible material: Hazardous gas

(principally carbon dioxide and methane). Potentially Infilled Ground within 250m

- Hazardous gas (principally carbon dioxide and methane). - No significant sources identified in influencing distance to the site.

Surrounding Industries - Metals, inorganic compounds and organic compounds. - Not expected to be a significant source due to distance from site.

Underlying Pennine Lower Coal Measures - Ground Gas (principally carbon dioxide and methane).

Table 2-3: Potential contamination sources



Potential receptors for all three areas are detailed in Table 2-4.

Receptors

Human Health - Future site users (including residents, visitors and site workers). - Offsite land users.

Controlled Waters - Secondary A Aquifer (bedrock). - Small culvert / drain 244m W is not considered to be a significant

receptor given the distance from the site. Buildings and structures. Potable water pipes. Flora within future gardens/landscaping.

Table 2-4: Potential receptors Potential pathways for all three areas are detailed in Table 2-5.

Pathways

Soil

Human Health7 (residential land use: houses with private gardens)

- Ingestion of soil. - Ingestion of soil-derived indoor dust. - Ingestion of contaminated vegetables. - Ingestion of soil attached to vegetables. - Dermal contact with soil. - Dermal contact with soil-derived indoor dust. - Inhalation of soil-derived outdoor dust. - Inhalation of soil-derived indoor dust. - Inhalation of vapours outside. - Inhalation of vapours inside.

- Windblown dust / fibres to adjacent receptors. - Direct contact with receptors (building foundations, services). - Root uptake.

Water

- Surface run-off over impermeable surface. - Site is relatively flat and grassed; therefore, surface run-off will be limited. - Infiltration into the ground, through potentially contaminated material (contamination

possibly going into solution). - Migration through potentially permeable strata and preferential pathways. - Superficial (Till) likely to be of low permeability. - Bedrock (mudstone, siltstone, sandstone) likely to be variably permeable. - Preferential pathways: fault on site, possible shallow worked coal seams

Gas

- Migration through potentially permeable strata and preferential pathways. - Superficial (Till) likely to be of low permeability. - Bedrock (mudstone, siltstone, sandstone) likely to be variably permeable. - Preferential pathways: fault on site, possible shallow worked coal seams. - Migration into buildings (e.g. via services) and accumulation of gases in confined

spaces (potentially causing explosion if methane is present). Table 2-5: Potential pathways

LKC Preliminary Contamination Conceptual Model The preliminary contamination conceptual model in the Envirotec Services Ltd report has been updated to be in line with LKC current risk assessment methodology (detailed below) for each of the three site aeras (Areas A, B and C). The model is based on the contamination sources, pathways and receptors identified in the original report. LKC also consider the following should be considered:

7 EA (2008). “Updated Technical Background to the CLEA Model.” Science Report – SC050021/SR3.



Flora in gardens, potable water supply and building structure as receptors as potential pathways have been identified to these receptors

The aim of the conceptual model is to provide a preliminary assessment of the likelihood of a pollutant linkage for each potential combination of contaminant, pathway and receptor. A conceptual model can be used to make an informed decision on the contamination risks associated with the site and determine what site investigation work is required. The preliminary contamination conceptual model has identified seven generic potential pollutant linkages. Each linkage is described along with an assessment of the risk based upon guidance on probabilities and consequences outlined in CIRIA C5528. In order to assess the potential risk for each pollutant linkage, an assessment of the magnitude of the potential consequence (severity) of the risk occurring and the magnitude of the probability (likelihood) of the risk occurring has been considered and classified. This is based on the guidance provided in CIRIA C552 and further details including a risk matrix is provided in Appendix A. Where LKC identified a low to very low risk, limited intrusive investigation work, a watching brief (during construction work) or no investigation work will be recommended. This will be dependent on the nature of the site and the proposed development. Where the risk falls into the moderate/low risk, LKC will undertake an assessment to establish what category the pollutant linkage will fall into (i.e. moderate or low risk will be chosen). Where LKC identifies a moderate or higher risk, intrusive work or precautionary remedial measures will be recommended. There may be risk from short term exposure from contaminated soil to site workers during development work. The Preliminary Contamination Conceptual Model deals with long term exposure to key receptors associated with the future use of the site. Acute risks can be easily mitigated by good environmental management of the site during site works. Standard health and safety precautions (as per HSE guidance9) should be adopted by all workers involved with site enabling and construction works. Therefore, this receptor is not considered in the contamination conceptual model.

Recommendations Based upon the Preliminary Contamination Conceptual Model a site investigation was recommended to assess the potential pollutant linkages further.

8 CIRIA (2001). “Contaminated land risk assessment: A guide to good practice”. C552. 9 HSE (1991). “Protection of Workers and the General Public During Development of Contaminated Land” London HMSO.



Pollutant Linkage Site Area Pathway Receptor Contaminant

(source) Probability Consequence Risk Assessment and Recommendations

PL1 A, B, C

Dermal contact. Inhalation of soil, fibres and dust.

Ingestion of soils, dust, vegetables, soil attached to vegetables.

Windblown dust.

Future site users.

Offsite receptors.

ACM Heavy metals PAHs. (potentially in made ground).

Low Likelihood Medium Moderate

/ Low

Low probability given no significant on-site sources anticipated and limited development recorded on site.

Recommendation: Confirmatory intrusive investigation require to include soil sampling.

PL2 A, B, C Inhalation of vapours. Migration through permeable strata and preferential pathways.

Future site users.

Offsite receptors.

Volatile Contaminants (no significant sources identified).

Unlikely Medium Low Unlikely as no significant sources identified. Recommendation: No testing required unless evidence of volatile contaminants identified.

PL3

A, B, C Inhalation of gas. Migration through permeable strata and preferential pathways.

Explosion in confined spaces.

Future site users.

Buildings. Offsite land users.

Hazardous Gas: Methane, carbon dioxide. (no significant sources identified).

Unlikely Severe Moderate / Low

Unlikely as no significant infilled anticipated close to site and underlying geology will limit lateral migration.

Low risk assumed at this stage. Recommendation: No gas monitoring required.

A, B, C

Ground Gas: Methane, carbon dioxide (coal measures bedrock)

Low likelihood Severe Moderate

Low probability as although potentially shallow worked coal seams may be present beneath site, no gassing seams identified and shallow geology likely to impede migration.

Recommendation: Precautionary gas monitoring required.

PL4 A, B, C

Surface Run-off. Migration through preferential pathways

Perched waters migration.

Groundwater (Secondary Aquifer).

Mobile contaminants such as metals, PAHs, (made ground).

Unlikely Medium Low

Unlikely as no significant sources of mobile contaminants anticipated. Clay expected below the site will also limit migration of mobile contaminants.

Recommendation: Precautionary groundwater sampling required.

PL5 A, B, C Sulphate attack on concrete.

Building structure.

Sulphate (made ground). Unlikely Mild Low

Unlikely as limited sources of contaminants anticipated.

Recommendation: Confirmatory intrusive investigation required as part of PL1.

PL6 A, B, C Ingestion of tainted water supply.

Future site users.

Water pipes.

Organic Contaminants (made ground).

Unlikely Medium Low Unlikely as significant contamination not anticipated at pipeline depth (0.75-1.35m).

Recommendation: Sampling required if made ground present at pipeline installation depths.

PL7 A, B, C Direct Contact (plant uptake). Flora.

Phytotoxic Contaminants (made ground).

Unlikely Minor Very Low Unlikely as significant sources not anticipated. Recommendation: Limited confirmatory investigation work as part of PL1.

Table 2-6. Preliminary Contamination Conceptual Model.



3 Ground Investigation

Site Investigation Design and Methodology In order to assess the ground conditions at the site and to investigate the potential pollutant linkages identified in the preliminary contamination conceptual model an intrusive investigation was undertaken. The investigation was carried out on 10th to 14th September 2019 and comprised the following: Area A

4no. window sample boreholes drilled to 5.22-6.35 metres below ground level (mbgl) (ref. WS101 to WS104).

4no. trial pits using mechanical excavator excavated to 3.1-4.0mbgl (ref. TP101 to TP104).

1no. rotary boreholes drilled to 30mbgl (ref. RBHA). Area B

3no. window sample boreholes drilled to 2.33-2.75mbgl (ref. WS105 to WS107).

3no. trial pits using mechanical excavator excavated to 3.0mbgl (ref. TP105 to TP107).

1no. rotary boreholes drilled to 30mbgl (ref. RBHB).

Area C

6no. window sample boreholes drilled to 2.45-4.45mbgl (ref. WS108 to WS113).

10no. trial pits using mechanical excavator excavated to 2.0-3.0mbgl (ref. TP108 to TP115).

1no. rotary boreholes drilled to 30mbgl (ref. RBHC). All site investigation locations are shown in Figure 3. The investigation locations were chosen to allow adequate assessment of ground conditions across the site based on a non-targeted investigation. Across the three areas, the number of site investigation location points corresponds to approximately one location per 30-35m square centres. This is in line with BS1017510 for an ‘exploratory investigation’. This is considered appropriate based on the history of the site. All profile logs are provided in Appendix B and are in line with BS14688-111 and BS593012.

10 British Standard (2017). “Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites – Code of Practice.” BS10175:2017. 11 British Standards (2002) Geotechnical investigation and testing – Identification and Classification of Soil. Part 1: Identification and description. BS EN ISO 14688-1:2002. 12 British Standard (2015). “Code of Practice for Ground Investigations”. BS5930:2015.



Well Installations All of the boreholes were installed with monitoring wells for gas, groundwater monitoring and groundwater sampling. Monitoring wells were installed in accordance with BS10175 and CIRIA C66513 and generally comprised approximately a section of plain pipe over a length of slotted pipe surrounded by pea gravel and sealed at the top with bentonite and concrete. Well installation details are provided in Profile Logs in Appendix B.

Sampling Protocol Soil Sampling (Contamination)

Standard sampling protocol and preservation of samples was undertaken as described in the EA guidance on site investigation14. Soil was collected for onsite testing. A plastic zip bag was half filled with soil allowing a suitably sized headspace. The bag was sealed and stored for at least 20 minutes before being tested for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) using a PhoCheck Tiger photoionisation detector (PID). Results of the PID readings are presented on the profile logs (Appendix B). The on-site monitoring was carried out in line CIRIA C66515 to aid in screening samples for volatile analysis. Soil samples of approximately 500g were recovered in amber jars, amber vials for volatile analysis and plastic tubs. All the samples were labelled and stored in cool boxes prior to being collected by courier at the end of the day for delivery to the Chemtest laboratory in Newmarket for chemical testing. If collection was not possible the same day then samples were stored in the sample storage fridge at the LK Group offices below 4˚C. Samples were tracked using appropriate Chain of Custody forms provided by Chemtest. Many of the contamination tests are UKAS or MCERTS accredited and further details are given in the Certificate of Analysis presented in Appendix C. Table 3-1 shows the soil testing undertaken.

Suites and Contaminants Area No. Samples Justification

Metals / metalloids, pH, water soluble sulphate, speciated PAHs, SOM and asbestos screen.

A 6 A basic suite with a broad selection of contaminants tested on samples across the site where no significant evidence of contamination was identified (with the exception of occasional ash and coal) and no TVOCs identified from the PID tests.

B 5

C 15

Metals / metalloids, pH, water soluble sulphate, cyanide suite, phenol, TPHCWG, BTEX, MTBE, speciated PAHs, SOM and asbestos screen.

A 4 Although no evidence of contamination identified, detailed suite undertaken to confirm the absence of contamination and allow a more detailed waste assessment.

B 4

C 8

Table 3-1. Summary of soil sample testing undertaken. Notes: If asbestos present during screen identification and quantification will be undertaken. Metal/metalloids=arsenic, cadmium, chromium, (total and hexavalent), copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, vanadium, zinc and boron; TPHCWG=carbon banded and aromatic/aliphatic split petroleum hydrocarbons;

13 CIRIA (2007). “Assessing Risks Posed by Hazardous Ground Gases to Buildings.” CIRIA C665. 14 EA (2000). “Technical Aspects of Site Investigation. Volumes 1 & 2 Text Supplements Research and Development Technical Report.” P5-065/Tr. 15 CIRIA (2007). “Assessing Risks Posed by Hazardous Ground Gases to Buildings.” CIRIA C665.



PAH=polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, BTEX=benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes; MTBE=Methyl tert-butyl ether, SOM=Soil Organic Matter. Due to a laboratory administrative error, some of the samples (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) and cyanide from WS103, WS105, WS106 and WS107) were reported as deviating due to sample age. There was no visual / olfactory evidence of volatile hydrocarbons during the site investigation and laboratory testing was only undertaken on a precautionary basis. The laboratory deviations are not expected to be significant in the assessment of the risk.

Water Sampling

To establish the condition of groundwater LKC undertook seven groundwater samples. The groundwater samples were collected a minimum of 1 week after drilling had finished and following well development. Sample collection was undertaken using a low flow sampling pump using thin walled tubing to encourage laminar flow and minimise the potential loss of volatiles during sampling. The borehole was purged of all standing water and the sample collected from the recharged water. The sample was collected in glass and plastic bottles and a glass vial. A water meter was used to test the pH, temperature and conductivity before sampling until equilibrium conditions were met, as per BS1017516 guidelines. All water samples were placed in glass bottles, plastic bottles and septum topped vials and stored in ice packed cool boxes. The samples were sent to Chemtest on the same day for analysis. Sampling was carried out in accordance with BS593017 and BS5667-1118. Many of the tests are UKAS or MCERTS accredited and further details are given in the Certificate of Analysis presented in Appendix D. Table 3-2 shows the groundwater testing undertaken.

Suites and Contaminants Area No.

Samples Location Justification

Metals / metalloids, pH, sulphate, cyanide suite, TPHCWG, BTEX, MTBE, speciated PAHs, phenol and hardness.

A 2 WS101 WS103

Detailed suite undertaken across the site to confirm the absence of contamination.

B 1 WS106

C 4

WS108 WS110 WS112 WS113

Table 3-2: Summary of groundwater sampling tests undertaken. Notes: Metal/metalloids=arsenic, cadmium, chromium, (total and hexavalent), copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, vanadium, zinc and boron; TPHCWG=carbon banded and aromatic/aliphatic split petroleum hydrocarbons; PAH=polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, BTEX=benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes; MTBE=Methyl tert-butyl ether.

Gas Monitoring Six gas monitoring visits have been undertaken over a 3-month period (3rd October to 23rd December 2019) in all installed boreholes.

16 British Standard (2017). “Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites – Code of Practice.” BS10175:2017. 17 British Standard (2015). “Code of Practice for Ground Investigations”. BS5930:2015. 18 British Standard (2009). “Water Quality – Sampling. Part 11: Guidance on Sampling of Groundwaters”. BS ISO 5667-11:2009.



The typical / idealised monitoring period and frequency is in line with C66519 for a very low gassing potential of a source and high sensitivity of development (residential with gardens). Monitoring was undertaken using a Geotechnical Instruments GA2000 plus and or a GA5000 in accordance with the monitoring protocol outlined in CIRIA C665 (flow rate measured first). The monitoring was undertaken over a range of weather conditions (including low and falling barometric pressure and heavy rain) to demonstrate worst-case conditions. The gas monitoring results to date are reproduced in full in Appendix E.

Geotechnical Testing In-situ Onsite Geotechnical Testing

In-situ geotechnical tests were performed in the boreholes to further characterise the sub-soil conditions. The following tests were undertaken:

Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) were performed in the window sample boreholes at approximately 1m intervals, generally within the natural strata.

Shear Vane tests & Pocket Penetrometer (giving undrained shear strength) were performed in the window sample boreholes (to a maximum depth of 3mbgl) and trial pits at approximately 0.5m intervals, within the natural clay strata.

The SPT, shear vane and pocket penetrometer readings are provided within the profile logs (Appendix B).

Laboratory Geotechnical Testing

Soil samples taken during the investigation were collected in tubs, bulk bags and sealed U100 tubes and sent to Murray Rix Laboratories and Chemtest for geotechnical testing. Many of the tests are UKAS accredited and further details are given in the laboratory report presented in Appendix F. Table 3-3 shows the geotechnical testing undertaken.

19 CIRIA (2007). “Assessing Risks Posed by Hazardous Ground Gases to Buildings.” CIRIA C665.



Suites and

Contaminants No. Samples Area Location

BRE SD1 Short suite 13

A A A A B B B C C C C C C

WS103/ 0.6-1.2m WS104/ 0.3-1.3m TP102/ 0.5-1.5m TP103/ 0.3-1.3m WS106/ 0.5-0.8m TP105/ 0.2-1.2m TP107/ 0.3-1.3m WS110/ 0.3-1.0m TP108/ 0.2-1.2m TP110/ 0.3-1.3m TP111/ 0.3-1.3m TP113/ 0.3-1.3m TP115/ 0.2-1.0m

Atterberg Limits (plasticity testing) 13

A A A A B B B C C C C C C

WS101/ 2.0-2.2m WS102/ 1.5-2.0m WS103/ 1.5-2.0m WS104/ 2.5-3.0m TP105/ 0.2-1.2m TP106/ 2.3-3.0m WS105/ 0.2-1.0m WS109/ 0.5-1.0m WS110/ 0.5-1.0m WS111/ 0.5-1.0m WS113/ 0.5-1.0m TP108/ 0.2-2.0m TP110/ 0.3-1.3m

Single Stage Triaxial 7

A A C C C C C

WS101/ 2.5-3.0m WS103/ 1.5-2.0m WS109/ 2.5-3.0m WS110/ 1.5-2.0m WS111/ 2.2-2.6m WS112/ 1.5-2.0m WS113/ 1.5-2.0m

Particle Size Distribution (PSD) 3

B B B

TP105/ 1.5-3.0m TP116/ 0.2-3.0m TP117/ 1.7-3.0m

Table 3-3: Summary of geotechnical testing undertaken.

CBR (Clegg Hammer) Tests

Clegg Hammer testing was undertaken in trial pits. The Clegg Impact Soil Tester provides a simple means of testing the compaction levels of the ground for highways design. Testing involves dropping the test Hammer, of mass nominally 4.5kg, five times at each test location to give an Impact Value. The Impact Values give an indication of soil strength and can be used to provide equivalent CBR values. Clegg Hammer results are included in the profile logs and are presented in Appendix B.



4 Ground Conditions

Geology – Generalised Sequence The ground conditions beneath the site comprised topsoil and made ground underlain by natural variously clayey sand, sandy clay and clayey sandy gravel. A summary section of the logs is provided in Plate 4-1a-c, with additional comments below.

Plate 4-1a: Summary of ground conditions - Area A.

Plate 4-1b: Summary of ground conditions - Area B.

Plate 4-1c: Summary of ground conditions - Area C. Key:



Made ground was encountered across Site A, generally comprising reworked topsoil of sandy gravelly Clay and clayey Sand with occasional part and whole brick, rare coal, ash and pottery. Made ground in this area of the site was typically encountered at <0.5m thick, with the exception of WS101 and TP104 where made ground was encountered up to 1.2 and >4.0mbgl, respectively. Areas B & C comprised variously topsoil and made ground (reworked topsoil with rare brick, ash, pottery and glass), typically 0.2-0.3m thick. It is considered that the topsoil/ made ground encountered across all three areas is of similar composition, with rare sporadic anthropogenic inclusions such as ash and brick. A band of coal was encountered from 1.1-2.3mbgl in TP106 in Area B Weak sandstone (bedrock) was encountered in Area C in WS111 (2.8 to >3.25mbgl). Weak weathered mudstone (bedrock) was encountered in WS112 (1.3 to >2.45mbgl), WS113 (2.15 to >3.15mbgl). The rotary boreholes encountered sandstone bedrock from 3.0-4.5mbgl and siltstone from 15-16mbgl. In Area C, RBHC encountered a void from 5.6-6.5m with ‘soft broken drilling’ from 6.5-8.0mbgl. A total loss of flush was recorded at 5.6mbgl in this borehole. No visual / olfactory evidence of hydrocarbons or volatile contaminants in any locations.

Groundwater Groundwater strikes were recorded during the investigation in trial pits and boreholes. In addition, groundwater monitoring within the borehole wells has been undertaken on six occasions. An oil-water interface probe (approximately 1cm detection limit) was used to detect the presence of free phase hydrocarbons within each borehole.



BH/TP Area Water Strike

Depths (mbgl)

Well Response

Zone (mbgl)

No. of Monitoring

Visits

Monitoring Depths (mbgl)

Sample Taken?

Evidence of

Contam?

WS101 A Dry 1.0-5.0 6 3.33-3.63 Y (G) N WS102 A Dry 1.0-5.0 6 3.80-5.90 N N WS103 A Dry 1.0-5.0 6 2.43-2.90 Y (G) N WS104 A Dry 1.0-5.0 6 2.05-4.44 N N TP101 A Dry - - - - N TP102 A Dry - - - - N TP103 A 3.4 - - - - N TP104 A 0.3 - - - - N WS105 B Dry 1.0-2.0 6 1.76-1.93 N N WS106 B Dry 1.0-2.0 6 0.81-2.60 Y (G) N WS107 B Dry 1.0-2.0 6 2.52-Dry N N TP105 B 1.5 - - - - N TP106 B 1.1 - - - - N TP107 B Dry - - - - N WS108 C Dry 1.0-3.0 6 Flooded-0.79 Y (G) N WS109 C 0.9 0.8-3.8 6 2.34-3.21 N N WS110 C Dry 1.0-4.0 6 0.42-1.26 Y (G) N WS111 C 0.2 0.8-2.8 6 2.72-2.77 N N WS112 C Dry 1.0-2.0 6 0.47-1.66 Y (G) N WS113 C Dry 0.7-2.7 6 0.20-0.49 Y (G) N TP108 C Dry - - - - N TP109 C Dry - - - - N TP110 C Dry - - - - N TP111 C Dry - - - - N TP112 C Dry - - - - N TP113 C Dry - - - - N TP114 C 0.4 - - - - N TP115 C Dry - - - - N TP116 C 1.0 - - - - N TP117 C 2.0 - - - - N

Table 4-1: Summary of water strike depths within boreholes and trial pits. Notes: G=Groundwater Sample Groundwater has fluctuated over the monitoring period. Waterlogging was noted in areas of the site.

In-Situ Geotechnical Testing Standard Penetration Tests

In-situ standard penetration tests (SPTs) were undertaken, predominantly in the natural ground. The results are provided within the profile logs in Appendix B and discussed in Section 5.

Shear Vanes

Hand shear vane readings, recording undrained shear strength (cu), were taken within the clay strata. The results are provided within the profile logs in Appendix B and discussed in Section 5.



Pocket Penetrometer

Pocket penetrometer readings undrained shear strength (cu), were taken within the clay strata. The results are provided within the profile logs in Appendix B and discussed in Section 5.

Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Single Stage Triaxial Test

Single stage triaxial testing has been undertaken on seven samples of the natural clay strata. The results are presented in Appendix F and summarised in Table 4-2.

Location Area Depth (mbgl) Material Description

Undrained Shear

strength (kPa)

WS101 A 2.5-3.0m Firm brown silty sandy Clay with rare gravel 65

WS103 A 1.5-2.0m Stiff brown silty sandy Clay with rare gravel. 82

WS109 C 2.5-3.0m Firm to stiff silty sandy Clay with rare gravel. 74

WS110 C 1.5-2.0m Stiff brown silty sandy Clay with rare gravel. 105

WS111 C 2.2-2.6m Soft to firm brown silty sandy Clay with rare gravel. 39

WS112 C 1.5-2.0m Soft brown silty sandy Clay with rare gravel 24

WS113 C 1.5-2.0m Blackish brown silty Sand and Gravel N/A* Table 4-2: Summary of single stage triaxial results. Note: *Sample did not hold together during extraction

Particle Size Distribution

Particle size distribution (PSDs) tests were carried out on granular strata to confirm the material type. Full results are presented in Appendix F and summarised below in Table 4-3.

Location Area Depth (mbgl) Material Percent passing through sieve

63mm 2mm 0.063mm

TP105 B 1.5-3.0 Brown clayey silty fine to coarse SAND with occasional gravel

100% 87% 37%

TP116 C 0.2-3.0m Brown clayey silty fine to coarse SAND with occasional gravel

100% 90% 35%

TP117 C 1.7-3.0m Brown slightly silty sandy fine to coarse GRAVEL 100% 10% 2%

Table 4-3: Summary of particle size distribution results. Notes: % passing: 63mm = cobble / gravel boundary; 2mm = gravel / sand boundary; 0.063mm = sand / silt boundary



Atterberg Limits

Representative samples of natural clay were subjected to Atterberg Limits (plasticity) and Moisture Content testing. Results are presented in Appendix F and summarised in Table 4-4. Table 4-4 also includes the modified plasticity index as detailed in Chapter 4.2-D5 of the NHBC standards (modified plasticity index = plasticity index x % less than 425μm sieve / 100%).

Loca

tion

Area

Dept

h (m

bgl)

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t (%

)

Liqu

id L

imit

(%)

Plas

tic L

imit

(%)

Plas

ticity

In

dex

(%)

Clas

s

Pass

ing

425

mic

ron

(%)

Mod

ified

Pl

astic

ity

Inde

x (%

)

WS101 A 2.0-2.2 21 35 13 22 CL 81 17.82 WS102 A 1.5-2.0 20 40 15 25 CI 89 22.25 WS103 A 1.5-2.0 12 34 12 22 CL 86 18.92 WS104 A 2.5-3.0 15 37 13 24 CI 85 20.40 WS105 B 0.2-1.0 10 30 11 19 CL 90 17.10 TP105 B 0.2-1.2 10 33 11 22 CL 84 18.48 TP106 B 2.3-3.0 14 36 12 24 CL 88 21.12 WS109 C 0.5-1.0 41 50 24 26 CI 82 21.32 WS110 C 0.5-1.0 12 27 11 16 CL 67 10.72 WS111 C 0.5-1.0 13 34 10 24 CL 89 21.36 WS113 C 0.5-1.0 13 37 12 25 CI 95 23.75 TP108 C 0.2-2.0 25 41 16 25 CI 82 20.50 TP110 C 0.3-1.3 31 38 16 22 CI 77 16.94

Table 4-4: Summary of plasticity index testing. The modified plasticity index is between 11% and 24%. This characterises the clay as having a low to medium volume change potential.

Sulphate and pH

Water soluble sulphate and pH tests were carried out on soil and groundwater samples. Full results are presented in Appendix C (soils) and Appendix D (groundwater) and summarised in Table 4-5.

Strata pH Sulphate

Soil Groundwater Soil (g/l) Groundwater (mg/l) Topsoil 5.1-6.5

6.2-9.3 0.027-0.067

6-60 Made Ground 5.8-7.2 <0.010-0.049 Natural 5.8-8.2 <0.010-0.032

Table 4-5: Summary of pH and sulphate results.



5 Geotechnical Assessment

Proposed Development For the purposes of this assessment, it has been assumed that the development will comprise low rise residential housing. A development plan has not been provided to LKC and therefore details of the proposed loadings are not known and therefore a line loading of 75kN/m has been assumed for preliminary assessment purposes only. Based on the above, it is considered that the development will meet the criteria of Geotechnical Category 1 of Euro Code 720.

Summary of Ground Conditions Ground conditions identified at the site are detailed in Section 4.1 and typically comprises topsoil and Made Ground (topsoil) over soft becoming firm and stiff variably sandy gravelly CLAY. Granular layers and horizons of SAND and GRAVEL have been recorded within some of the exploratory holes, specifically within several holes in Area B and within two trial pits (TP116 & TP117) in the east of Area C. Within Area A only one location was found to contain granular strata (WS103). Made Ground was recorded within a number of the exploratory holes across the three sites, typically to depths of under 0.50m with the exception of WS101 where Made Ground was recorded to a depth of 1.20m and the location of TP104 where the extent of the Made Ground was not proven (>4.0m). Within TP106, a 1.2m thick seam of coal was recorded between 1.10m and 2.30mbgl. Coal was not recorded within any of the other exploratory holes, although ‘broken ground’ was encountered in RBHC. Bedrock consisting of either mudstone or sandstone was recorded in three of the window sample boreholes in the east of Area C.

Site Preparation The site should be cleared and any vegetation below areas of proposed development stripped in accordance with Series 200 of the Specification for Highway Works. This should include:

Roots present below the footprint of proposed structures and infrastructure should be grubbed out and the resulting void infilled with suitable compacted engineered fill.

Foundation Conditions and Bearing Capacity General Ground Conditions

An assessment of the undrained shear strength (cu) for the Glacial Till diamicton has been undertaken using data obtained from in-situ SPT, PP and HV tests. The undrained shear strengths have been plotted against depth for Areas A and C, as shown in Graphs 5-1 & 5-2. The cu for Area B has not been assessed as the site has a mixture of granular and cohesive strata and it is considered that a uniform bearing stratum may not be feasible in the natural deposits.

20 BS (2004) “Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design”. BS EN 1997-1: 2004.



Graph 5-1: Undrained Shear Strength v Depth for locations tested at Area A.

Graph 5-2: Undrained Shear Strength v Depth for locations tested at Area C.



Area A Within Area A, it is considered that the Made Ground and Topsoil are not suitable for a founding strata due to the inherent variability of the material. The predominant strata is cohesive with the exception of the location of trial pit TP104 in which Made Ground (reworked firm to stiff clay) was encountered to a depth in excess of 4.00mbgl. Foundation options are therefore:

Shallow strip foundations into the underlying Glacial Till; Conventional strip footings on vibro granular columns, or; Mini pile foundations.

These options are discussed below.

Strip Foundations

Strip foundations should be constructed at least 150mm into the underlying firm to stiff clay. At a depth of 1.00–1.20mbgl an allowable bearing capacity of 82kN/m² has been calculated using a cu of 40kN/m² taken from Graph 5-1. Atterberg limits determinations, summarised in Table 4-4 show the clay to be of low to intermediate plasticity with a low to medium volume change potential. As such the sides of the foundations may require protection using clay board or similar. Foundation depths should take account of the presence of existing and proposed trees with foundations deepened locally in accordance with the requirements of NHBC Standards for a clay of intermediate plasticity. It is recommended that at working drawing stage a foundation schedule is prepared for the development taking account of the soil plasticity and the locations and species of trees. At the location of TP104, allowance should be made for the inspection of ground conditions, it may be necessary to widen or reinforce foundations to compensate for variability in strata type.

Ground Improvement

The use of ground improvement techniques such as vibro granular columns will allow shallow foundations to be utilised with the shallow deposits. The vibro granular columns should provide a bearing capacity of around 150kN/m² but will also remove variability within the Made Ground and natural ground CLAY. Specialist advice should be sought from a suitably experience contractor with regard to allowable bearing capacity and settlements.

Piled Foundations

As an alternative, consideration maybe given to the use of mini piled foundations, utilising both shaft and base resistance socketed into the bedrock where applicable. Pile design should be undertaken by a specialist contractor to allow them to reduce the factor of safety based on their extensive pile testing data.

Recommendation

Whilst a ground improvement and piling solution are viable, it is considered that the majority of the site will prove suitable for shallow strip foundations, which will provide the most reliable and cost effective option for the site.



Area B Area B contains a mix of granular and cohesive deposits and a uniform bearing stratum is not considered achievable.

Foundation options are therefore:

Conventional strip footings on vibro granular columns; Raft foundations; or Mini pile foundations.

These options are discussed below.

Ground Improvement

The use of ground improvement techniques such as vibro granular columns will allow shallow foundations to be utilised with the shallow deposits. The vibro granular columns should provide a bearing capacity of around 150kN/m² but will also remove variability within the Made Ground and natural ground CLAY. Specialist advice should be sought from a suitably experience contractor with regard to allowable bearing capacity and settlements.

Raft Foundations

Raft foundations would allow construction on soils of varying compressibility, such as the interbedded sands and clays encountered within the exploratory holes at Area B. The partial rigidity given by a stiff slab and beam construction is utilised to bridge over areas of more compressible soil, thereby minimizing differential settlement of the foundation.

Piled Foundations


Recommendation

Raft foundations, whilst viable will require specialist structural design and whilst a piling solution is also viable it is considered that vibro granular columns will provide the most reliable and cost effective option for the site.

Area C Within Area C, it is considered that the Made Ground and Topsoil are not suitable for a founding strata due to the inherent variability of the material. The predominant strata is cohesive with the exception of the eastern end of the site where TP116 encountered a granular stratum to a depth in excess of 3.00mbgl and TP117 where granular strata was encountered beneath 1.70mbgl to in excess of 3.00mbgl. Bedrock was also encountered within the window sample holes in the eastern section of the site at depths of between 1.30m and 2.80mbgl. Foundation options are therefore:

Shallow strip foundations into the underlying Glacial Till; Ground Improvement; or Mini pile foundations.



These options are discussed below. Strip Foundations

Strip foundations should be constructed at least 150mm into the underlying firm to stiff clay. At a depth of 1.00 - 1.20mbgl an allowable bearing capacity of 103kN/m² has been calculated using a cu of 50kN/m² taken from Graph 5-2. Atterberg limits determinations, summarised in Table 4-4 show the clay to be of low to intermediate plasticity with a low to medium volume change potential. As such the sides of the foundations may require protection using clay board or similar. Foundation depths should take account of the presence of existing and proposed trees with foundations deepened locally in accordance with the requirements of NHBC Standards for a clay of intermediate plasticity. It is recommended that at working drawing stage a foundation schedule is prepared for the development taking account of the soil plasticity and the locations and species of trees.

Ground Improvement

The use of ground improvement techniques such as vibro granular columns will allow shallow foundations to be utilised with the shallow deposits. The vibro granular columns should provide a bearing capacity of around 150kN/m² but will also remove variability within the natural ground CLAY and GRAVEL. Specialist advice should be sought from a suitably experience contractor with regard to allowable bearing capacity and settlements.

Piled Foundations


Recommendation

Whilst a ground improvement or piling solution is viable, it is considered that the majority of the site will prove suitable for shallow strip foundations, which will provide the most reliable and cost effective option for the site.

Ground Floor Slabs The Atterberg Limits determinations, summarised in Table 4-4, show the clay to typically be of low and intermediate plasticity and as such liable to heave. It is therefore considered that suspended floor slabs should be used for residential properties at this development.

Pavement Construction An assessment of the likely California Bearing Ratio (CBR) for the natural cohesive CLAY has been assessed from the following sources:

Description of the materials encountered in the exploratory holes; Plasticity index of the cohesive soils.

Based on this it is considered that a CBR of 4% should be adopted at design stage. It is, however, recommended that this be re-assessed upon a layout plan for the site being finalised which can then be used to assess the proposed access roads. These routes should then be tested using on site plate tests of the formation.



Based on the plasticity index of the cohesive soils, it is considered that these may be frost susceptible and preventative measures to reduce frost action on estate roads may be required. Following excavation the sub formation should be proof rolled and any soft material inspected and removed.

Drainage Soil infiltration tests were not undertaken as part of this assessment; however, it is considered that the underlying clay is likely to be of low permeability and therefore unsuitable for the application of soak away drainage. It is recommended that, upon finalising a development layout plan, that in-situ testing is undertaken to prove or disprove the suitability of the clay for soakaway drainage.

Concrete Durability Based upon the results of the chemical analyses summarised in Table 4-5, it is considered that subsurface concrete can be designed in accordance with Design Sulphate Class DS-1, Aggressive Chemical Environment for Concrete Classification (ACEC) AC-1s in accordance with the recommendations provided in BRE Special Digest 1 (2005).

Excavations Site observations indicated that excavations should be feasible in the near surface with normal plant. It is anticipated that any obstructions will be grubbed out during the reduced level dig for the sub structure works. Groundwater seepage was recorded in a number of the trial holes typically within the granular strata; these are considered to be representative of perched water within these strata. The stability of the trial pits was recorded stable within the cohesive strata and as unstable where granular horizons encountered. Due to the recorded instability of some of the exploratory holes, it is considered that excavations within the granular deposits are supported or battered back in accordance with guidance contained in CIRIA R97. Groundwater seepages were noted in several trial pits, however, these were minor and it considered that conventional sump pumping should be adequate.

Minerals A 1.2m thick coal seam was recorded in trial pit TP106 undertaken near the northern boundary of Area B, at a depth of 1.10mbgl. Coal was not recorded within any of the other exploratory holes. Three rotary boreholes advanced to depths of 30mbgl did not encounter any shallow seams of coal although borehole RBHC, located in the centre of Area C, did encounter a void between 5.60m and 6.50mbgl with broken ground between 6.50m and 8.00mbgl and total loss of flush which could be representative of an unrecorded worked seam. A Coal Mining Risk Assessment (CMRA) should be completed to assist in identifying what risks any coal mining issues, including cumulative effects, pose to the development. As sections of the sites are within a coal mining Development High Risk



Area, the Coal Authority, as statutory consultees to all planning applications, will require a CMRA to be completed. LKC understand that stabilisation works were undertaken as part of the construction of Ellison Fold Way.

Further Works Upon finalisation of a development layout, the following further works would assist to reduce development costs and risk:

Coal Mining Risk Assessment; In-situ plate load tests to inform CBR for road and pavement design; BRE 365 Soakaways; Foundation Schedule – foundation zoning plan.

Construction Activity and Inspection The following activities and inspections should be incorporated into the site works:

Sufficient allowance should be made for the inspection of formation and sub formations to foundations and pavement construction;

Excavations where access is required should be subject to a risk assessment from a competent person and where appropriate mitigation measures such as benching back the sides or use of support systems in accordance with CIRIA R97 utilised;

It is considered that de-watering may be required, especially following periods of heavy rainfall. Removal of surface water and water within trenches should be possible with conventional sump pumping. Discharge of any water should be agreed with the relevant regulatory body and be undertaken under a trade effluent discharge, where required. Measures to remove silt and suspended solids may be required and consideration should be given to provision of space for settling tanks or an attenuation pond, and;

Where access to confined spaces is required appropriate mitigation measures should be addressed within the Construction Stage Health and Safety Plan. Particular account should be taken of the gas results.

The presence of potential contamination and mitigation measures should be addressed as part of the Construction Stage Health and Safety Plan and should include measures to design out the risks, reduce their impact and finally the use of Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE).



6 Generic Risk Assessment

Introduction Current good practice requires that the findings from a site investigation should be evaluated on a site-specific basis, using a risk-based approach. Risk assessment involves identification and evaluation of the hazards presented by the concentrations of contaminants measured followed by an evaluation of the risks which are associated with these hazards (CLR1121). Information gathered from the risk assessment has been collated in the revised contamination conceptual model in Section 6.6.

Soil Risk Assessment Methodology

With regards to the soil risk assessment LKC will use the following hierarchy:

Category 4 Screening Levels (C4SLs). LQM Suitable 4 Use Levels (S4ULs).

C4SLs were published in 201322,23. The change to the contaminated land guidance has changed the evaluation of risk from ‘minimal’ (referred to as Health Criteria values (HCVs))24 used to generate Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) to ‘low’ (referred to as Lowest Level of Toxicological Concern (LLTCs)). The policy companion document and supporting letter by Defra, dated 3rd September 2014, states that C4SLs ‘could be used under the planning regime, as well as within Part 2A’. Based on these comments LKC considers the justifications and assumptions used to generate ‘low’ risk are suitable for the planning regime. Where no C4SLs have been generated LKC will use the LQM S4ULs25. Similar assumptions and land uses to C4SLs have been used. However, toxicological information has been based on ‘minimal risk’ as per previous guidelines and assumptions26,27,28,29. If contaminants are not present as C4SLs and S4ULs then LKC will use ATRISK SSVs or CL:AIRE GACs30. These follow the ‘minimal’ risk principle and more stringent exposure parameters and will be conservative.

LKC consider the main risk drivers for PAHs are benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P) and naphthalene. This is due to B(a)P possibly being a carcinogen and most toxic of the

21 EA (2004). “Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination.” R&D Publication CLR 11. 22 Defra (2014). “SP1010: Development of Category 4 Screening Levels and Assessment of Land Affected by Contamination – Policy Companion Document.” 23 CL:AIRE (2013). “SP1010: Development of Category 4 Screening Levels and Assessment of Land Affected by Contamination – Final project Report.” 24 EA (2008). “Human Health Toxicological Assessment of Contaminants in Soils.” Science Report – SC050021/SR2. 25 LQM (2014). “The LQM/CIEH S4ULs for Human Health Risk Assessment.” 26 EA (2008). “Updated Technical Background to the CLEA Model.” Science Report – SC050021/SR3. 27 EA (2008). “Human Health Toxicological Assessment of Contaminants in Soils.” Science Report – SC050021/SR2. 28 EA (2008). “A Review of Body Weight and Height Data used within the Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment Model (CLEA).” Project SC050021/Technical Review 1. 29 EA (2009). “Compilation of Data for Priority Organic Pollutants for Derivation of Soil Guideline Values.” Science report SC050021/SR7. 30 CL:AIRE (2009). “The Soil Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment.”



PAHs31,32 and naphthalene the most volatile and soluble33. The new C4SLs indicate B(a)P as a surrogate marker for carcinogenic PAHs, if it falls within appropriate limits, since the risk from other non-carcinogenic PAHs are considered negligible34. For B(a)P to be used as a surrogate marker it should follow the profile described by the HPA (2008)35 and CL:AIRE (2013). Naphthalene will be treated separately using the LQM S4ULs. The proposed development has not been confirmed, therefore the most precautionary assessment criteria of residential with plant uptake has been used. All criteria have been generated using the CLEA V1.06 model36 based either on 1%, 2.5% and 6% Soil Organic matter (SOM). Results will be compared to the nearest appropriate SOM. ATRISK SSVs and CL:AIRE GACs were not required for this dataset and have not been included. B(a)P as Surrogate Marker Based on the above assumption for PAHs, LKC undertook an assessment of the data for the site with regards to using B(a)P as a surrogate marker for carcinogenic PAHs as per HPA and CL:AIRE guidelines. The primary toxicological study related to Culp et.al37, which was based on coal tar mixtures (>80,000mg/kg of total PAHs) fed in food to mice over a two-year carcinogenicity study. Graph 6-1 summarises the study site data with respect to how the ratios of carcinogenic PAHs relate to B(a)P, within the confidence limits provided in the HPA document.

31 EA (2002). “Contaminants in Soils: Collation of Toxicological Data and Intake Values for Humans. Benzo[a]pyrene.” R&D Publication TOX2. 32 USEPA (1984). “Health Effects Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). EPA 540/1-86-013.” 33 EA (2003). “Review of the Fate and Transport of Selected Contaminants in the Soil Environment.” Draft technical report P5- 079/TR1. 34 CL:AIRE (2013). “SP1010: Development of Category 4 Screening Levels and Assessment of Land Affected by Contamination – Final project Report.” 35 HPA (2010). “HPA Contaminated Land Information Sheet: Risk Assessment Approaches for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs).” Version 3. 36 EA (2008). “CLEA Software (Version 1.05) Handbook.” Science Report – SC050021/SR4. 37 Culp, S; Gaylor, D; Sheldon, W; Goldstein, L and Beland, F (1998). “ A Comparison of Tumours Induced by Coal Tar and Benzo-a-pyrene in a 2-Year Bioassay.” Carcinogenesis. Vol 19, no. 1, pp. 117-124.



Graph 6-1: The ratio of PAH to B(a)P in soil for all available data at the site based on 20 samples (where values were >LOD to allow the calculation of a ratio). Notes: B(a)P = Benzo(a)pyrene; D(ah)A = Dibenzo(ah)anthracene; B(a)A = Benzo(a)anthracene; B(b)F = Benzo(b)fluoranthene; B(k)F = benzo(k)fluoranthene; I(123cd)P = Indeno(123cd)pyrene; B(ghi)P = Benzo(ghi)perylene = Ratio to B(a)P for all data = Mean ratio to B(a)P for Culp data = Mean ratio to B(a)P from all data at the site = Mean ratio to B(a)P for UK data presented by HPA = Upper and Lower limits (order of magnitude from Culp data) All the data points that could be used to calculate ratios fall inside the upper or lower limits. Based on this distribution of data LKC considers B(a)P can be used as a surrogate marker for carcinogenic PAHs and the C4SL criteria is suitable for this dataset.

Soil Results Comparison against Assessment Criteria

All analysis sheets are presented in Appendix C. Elevated and pertinent results are presented in Table 6-1.

Contaminant Units No. of samples

Elevated Results Area Sample Location Criteria Source of

Criteria Metals

Arsenic mg/kg 42 38 A WS102 (0.0-0.6m) 37 C4SL

Lead mg/kg 42 230 A WS102 (0.0-0.6m)

200 C4SL 430 C WS109 (0.0-0.2m)

PAHs

B(a)P mg/kg 42 8.5 C TP108 (0.0-0.2m)

5 C4SL 5.6 C TP113 (0.0-0.3m)

GENERAL pH pH 55 Range 5.6 to 8.2 SOM % 42 Range 0.64 to 13 Asbestos N/A 42 None detected.

Table 6-1: Summary of elevated and pertinent analytical results. Notes: Only results that exceeded assessment criteria have been shown and results from all depths are noted. Results have been compared to the nearest appropriate SOM.

0.01

0.10

1.00

10.00

100.00

B(a)A Chrysene B(b)F B(k)F D(ah)A I(123cd)P B(ghi)P

Rat

io to

B(a

)P



Elevated concentrations of metals and PAHs are considered to be associated with the presence of rare ash and coal within made ground and topsoil. No asbestos was identified in any soil samples analysed.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis has been undertaken on the data generated from the Made Ground (reworked topsoil) and topsoil as the nature of the soil is similar (refer to Section 4.1). Samples from Areas A-C have been included in the statistical assessment as the ground conditions were considered to be similar and samples across the three areas can be considered to be part of the same soil population. Current UK guidance on the use of statistical testing (CL:AIRE/CIEH38) for contaminated land has been revised from the original CLR739 methodology. The latest guidance separates the planning and Part 2A regimes and is based upon the Null Hypothesis and Alternate Hypothesis approach. LKC have used the ESI contaminated land statistics calculator40 to undertake this work, which follows the new UK guidance. For the planning scenario the question to be answered will be “can we confidently say that the level of contamination on this land is low relative to some appropriate measure of risk [e.g. C4SL, SSV or GAC values].” The statistical test should show which hypothesis is true within a defined level of confidence (normally 95%), using the upper confidence limit (UCL0.95). For the planning scenario, where the aim is to demonstrate the land is suitable for use the Null Hypothesis is the level of concentration that “is the same as, or higher than, the critical concentration [e.g. C4SL, S4UL, SSV or GAC value]” and the Alternative Hypothesis will be where the level of concentration “is lower than the critical concentration (Cc) .” If the Null Hypothesis is rejected, then it can be concluded that the Alternative Hypothesis is true (true mean ()<Cc) and that the potentially the site may be ‘suitable for use.’ If the Null Hypothesis is accepted (>Cc) then further measures may be needed and land may not be ‘suitable for use.’ Care must be used in selecting data for the statistical test. Where possible the site should be zoned (vertically and laterally). This is because these statistics cannot be undertaken on targeted (unbiased) samples. LKC did not undertake targeted sampling therefore the use of the statistical analysis is considered applicable. Soil concentrations that are considered outliers may show areas that deviate from the true mean concentration and need to be investigated separately (e.g. they may be hotspots that need to be remediated separately). These are calculated using the Grubb test originally described in CLR7, but only relates to normally distributed data. Log transformation may be used on data to also establish normal distribution for outliers, if required, following CL:AIRE guidance. The test for outliers was based on a 5% level of significance. In addition, detection limits are dealt with by using half the limits of detection (LOD) as per the guidelines.

38 CL:AIRE (2008). “Guidance on Comparing Soil Contamination Data with a Critical Concentration.” 39EA (2002). “Assessment of Risks to Human Health from Land Contamination: An Overview of the Development of Soil Guideline Values and related Research (CLR7).” 40 ESI (2011). “ESI Contaminated Land Statistics Calculator User Manual.” Version 2.



Furthermore, the guidance takes into account if the data follows a normal distribution (parametric), where a one-sided t-test can be used or non-normal distribution (non-parametric), where the Chebychev theorem should be used. This is done by using the Shapiro-Wilk test and graphical use of q-q plots. 29no. soil samples were used in the statistical analysis. As per the CLEA FAQ guidance given the blood model for lead has been used in the risk assessment then the log of the data should be used. Output sheets are provided in Appendix G. An outlier was identified for benzo(a)pyrene, however the CIEH guidance (page 25) indicates that outliers should only be removed from the dataset where there is an obvious demonstrable error in the laboratory data or clear evidence of more than one soil population. For this dataset there were no demonstrable laboratory errors in the data and made ground was of similar composition. Therefore, as stipulated in the CIEH guidance note ‘outlying data should be assumed to be genuine and reflective of the full range of soil concentrations to which receptors may be exposed’. Considering the above, a summary of the statistical analysis for topsoil/made ground is included in Table 6-2.

Cont

amin

ant

Criti

cal C

onc.

m

g/kg

n

Max

Val

ue

(exc

eeda

nces

)

LOD

(Num

ber)

Out

lier

Dist

ribut

ion

Mea

n m

g/kg

UCL 0

.95

mg/

kg

µ<Cc

Lead* 2.3 29 2.63 (2) <0.5 (0) 0 N 1.92 2.01 Arsenic 37 29 37 (1) <1 (0) 0 NN 16.3 22.5 B(a)P 5 29 8.5 (2) <0.1 (9) 1+ NN 1.32 2.92

Table 6-2: Summary of statistical analysis for topsoil/ made ground. Notes N = Normal Distribution; NN = Non-normal Distribution; = µ<Cc; X = µ>Cc or not enough evidence. * Log of 200m/kg. +TP108 identified as outlier; however, kept within dataset as considered to be representative of topsoil/ made ground strata. The Null Hypothesis for arsenic, lead and benzo(a)pyrene (PAHs) can be rejected and therefore these contaminants are not considered a significant risk.

Hazard Quotient

To examine the potential additivity of toxicological effects between the petroleum hydrocarbon fractions, a Hazard Index (HI) as described by the Environment Agency41 technical report was calculated for the samples. This should be undertaken when there are no elevated petroleum hydrocarbons, when compared to assessment criteria of individual fractions. HI results are summarised in Table 6-3 and included in Appendix H.

41 EA (2005). “The UK Approach for Evaluating Human Health Risks from Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soils.” Science report P5-080/TR3.



Sample Location Area Hazard Index Further

consideration required?

WS109 d2 C 0.16 N WS111 d1 C 0.22 N WS112 d1 C 0.28 N WS112 d2 C 0.16 N

TP101 A 0.33 N TP104 A 0.27 N TP104 A 0.16 N TP106 B 0.16 N TP112 C 0.23 N TP114 C 0.16 N TP114 C 0.16 N TP116 C 0.16 N WS103 A 0.30 N WS105 B 0.16 N WS106 B 0.16 N WS107 B 0.22 N

Table 6-3: HI Summary. Notes Bold where HI is >1

Direct Contact Risk – Pollutant Linkage 1

Elevated PAHs and metals (arsenic and lead) have been identified within topsoil/made ground on site. Given the limited number of samples were elevations were observed, it is considered that the exceedances relate to small pieces of coal or ash within the sub-sample analysed by the laboratory and are unlikely to be representative of site wide concentrations. Statistical analysis of the data indicates that the topsoil/made ground material from across the site is suitable for use. Moreover, generally topsoil/ made ground was only encountered at approximately 0-0.3m thick underlain by natural strata (with the exception of WS101 and TP104 in Area A), so it is considered likely that this material will be removed as part of enabling works and reduced levels for any development on site. At the concentrations identified, the contaminants are considered to pose a potential risk to future site users (residents) in gardens and soft landscaped areas, where made ground may be exposed / in contact with vegetables. The principal pathways are the ingestion pathways (soil, dust and vegetables) and dermal contact. The probability of PAH and metal contamination affecting site users is low likelihood. With a medium consequence, the risk is considered to be moderate/low across Areas A, B and C. Based on the assessment above, a low risk is assumed and remediation is not required. It is however recommended that a watching brief is maintained during groundworks and should any unusual ground conditions (significant ash, clinker, coal, pottery, etc) be encountered then this should be assessed and remediation may be required. This is discussed further in Section 9. No asbestos was identified in any of the samples, therefore the probability of asbestos affected site users is considered to be unlikely across Areas A, B and C. With a medium consequence, the risk is low. and remediation is not required. However, as a



precaution, construction workers should be and vigilant for any suspected ACM during groundworks (discussed further in Section 9). No evidence of hydrocarbons were identified during the site investigation and no elevated concentrations were reported in precautionary testing, therefore the probability of these contaminants posing a risk to site users in considered unlikely. With a medium consequence, the risk is considered to be moderate in Areas A, B and C and no remediation is recommended.

Risk from Inhalation of Vapours – Pollutant Linkage 2

No visual / olfactory evidence of volatile contaminants was identified during the investigation. The PID did not detect any TVOCs. Confirmatory TPH soil analysis did not detect any volatile contaminants above detection limits. LKC therefore consider the probability of volatile contaminants affecting site users as unlikely. The consequence is expected to be medium, giving a low risk in Areas A, B and C and no remediation is required with respect to pollutant linkage 2.

Gas Risk Assessment Six gas monitoring visits have been undertaken on the study site date. Gas monitoring results in full are presented in Appendix E. Following guidance set out in CIRIA C66542 and BS848543 peak methane and carbon dioxide concentrations have been used in the gas risk assessment. In addition, and as per guidance, flow rates were measured first. All gas concentrations, flow, pressure and groundwater levels are shown on Table 6-4.

Boreholes Area Visits Peak CH4

Range (%v/v)

Peak CO2

Range (%v/v)

Flow Range

(l/h)

Groundwater Level Range

(mbgl)

Pressure Range (mb)

WS101 A 6 3.5-7.2 5.2-24.7 0.1-4.0 3.33-3.63 973-994 WS102 A 6 0.4-8.3 <0.1-8.7 <0.1-4.4 3.80-5.90 973-994

WS103 A 6 0.1-4.2 9.4-39 <0.1-4.9 2.43-2.90 973-993

WS104 A 6 0.7-3.2 <0.1-12.5 <0.1-3.5 2..05-4.44 973-994

WS105 B 6 1-1.4 <0.1-13.3 <0.1-2.3 1.76-1.93 973-991

WS106 B 6 0.2-1.4 4.0-51.4 <0.1-0.2 0.81-2.60 973-991

WS107 B 6 1.9-13 <0.1-13.8 <0.1-1.2 2.52-Dry 973-991

WS108 C 6 <0.1-0.1 <0.1-3.7 - 0.00-0.79 973-993

WS109 C 6 <0.1-0.1 <0.1-6.2 0.1-1.8 2.34-3.21 973-992

WS110 C 6 <0.1-0.1 <0.1-6.7 <0.1-4.1 0.42-1.26 973-993

WS111 C 6 <0.1-0.1 <0.1-10 1.3-3.4 2.72-2.77 973-992

WS112 C 6 <0.1-0.2 <0.1-2.7 0.4-1.7 0.47-1.66 973-991

WS113 C 6 <0.1-0.1 0.8-3.5 <0.1 0.20-0.49 973-990 Table 6-4: Summary of gas monitoring. Notes: If concentrations / flow is zero, then equipment detection limits are assumed. Table shows peak concentrations of CH4, CO2 and low of O2. Bold where CO2 exceeds 5%v/v and CH4 exceeds 1%v/v.

42 CIRIA (2007). “Assessing Risks Posed by Hazardous Ground Gases to Buildings.” CIRIA C665. 43 BSI (2015). “Code of Practice for the Characterisation and Remediation from Ground Gas in Affected Developments.” BS8485:2015.



High flow readings have been identified across each of the three sites. In some instances (e.g. WS108 and WS113) these can be attributable to very high water levels within the well causing piston effects. Where this appears to be the case, this data has been excluded in the derivation of the GSVs, discussed below. Some high flow data does not correspond to high water levels and cannot be discounted. With the exception of WS108, WS112 and WS113 in Area C, there are frequent instances of elevated peak CH4 (max 13%v/v) and CO2 (max 51.4%v/v) concentrations. Elevated ground gas readings generally correspond to depleted oxygen levels, although this is not considered a risk to future site users due to rapid equilibration within the atmosphere. Elevated readings of CO have been encountered sporadically across all three areas of the site (max 64ppm). Only workplace exposure limits defined by the HSE are available for carbon monoxide and are not fully applicable to a residential setting. A Short-Term Exposure Limit of 200ppm (15-minute period) and Long-Term Exposure Limit of 30ppm have been defined (8-hour period). The inconsistent nature of CO readings does not suggest a significant source to be present and, as for depleted O2, it is considered that equilibrium with atmospheric conditions will be reached quickly within the unsaturated sub-surface. The elevated levels of both CH4 and CO2, depleted O2 and high flow readings across much of the site are likely to be associated ground gas associated with coal bearing strata and potential coal mining voids indicated to be present from beneath the site. Gas Screening Value In accordance with CIRIA C66544, a Gas Screening Value (GSV) may be calculated. Assuming worst-case scenario maximum gas concentrations and flow for each borehole have been used to calculate the GSV. The GSV can be used to determine the characteristic situation (CS). Table 6-5 shows the maximum GSV for each borehole and the appropriate characteristic situation (based on GSV only).

44 CIRIA (2007). “Assessing Risks Posed by Hazardous Ground Gases to Buildings.” CIRIA C665.



Boreholes Area Max GSV (l/hr) CS

WS101 A 1.22 CS3 WS102 A 0.38 CS2 WS103 A 1.91 CS3 WS104 A 0.44 CS2 WS105 B 0.31 CS2 WS106 B 0.10 CS2 WS107 B 0.17 CS2 WS108 C UC CS1* WS109 C 0.11 CS2 WS110 C 0.27 CS2 WS111 C 0.34 CS2 WS112 C 0.05 CS1 WS113 C UC CS1*

Table 6-5: Summary of Gas Screening Values (GSV). Notes: CS – Characteristic Situation; TL= Traffic Light. UC = Unable to calculate (no representative flow readings available dur to shallow groundwater). * = CS1 Considered appropriate as no elevated CH4 or CO2 above 1% v/v or 5%v/v (see below) Gas can potentially migrate into buildings, accumulate in confined spaces and cause explosions (methane) and asphyxiation. LKC consider the probability of carbon dioxide and / or methane gas affecting site users and buildings as likely. Assuming a severe consequence, there is a high risk associated with Pollutant Linkage 3 and remediation is required. Based on the gas monitoring data, it is considered suitable to zone the site with regards to gas risk assessment and the following Characteristic Situations as follows:

Area A - Characteristic Situation 3 gas protection required. Area B - Characteristic Situation 2 gas protection required. Area C - Characteristic Situation 2 gas protection required.

Controlled Water Assessment LKC considers the Secondary A Aquifer as the primary receptor. LKC have compared results above Limits of Detection (LOD). Where relevant the review of priority substances takes precedence considering threshold values for groundwater cannot be used ‘as part of site-specific investigations’. The hierarchy is as follows:

River Basin District Standards45 and updated Water Framework Directive46 for Annual Average / Maximum Allowable Concentration Environmental Quality Standards (AA-MAC-EQS) for priority substances (surface water risk).

2001 Environment Agency Values for Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) and UK Drinking Water Standard (UKDWS)47.

2009 UK Drinking Water Standard (UKDWS)48. Resource Protection Values (RPVs)49.

45 Defra (2010). “The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater Threshold Values”. Water Framework Directive (England and Wales) Directions 2010. 46 Defra (2015). “ Water Framework Directive (Standards and Classification) Directions (England and Wales) 2015”. 47 EA (2002). “Environment Agency technical advice to third parties on Pollution of Controlled Waters for Part IIA of the Environment Protection Act 1990.” 48 Statutory Instruments (2009). “The Private Water Supplies Regulation 2009.” No. 3101 49 SEPA (2010). “Assigning Groundwater Assessment Criteria for Pollutant Inputs.” WAT-PS-10-01.



Minimal Reporting Values (MRVs). With regards to hydrocarbon mixtures (TPHCWG) for UKDWS, LKC will use the CL:AIRE guidance on petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater50 based on WHO guidelines. No criteria values have been presented for surface waters (EQS) except the odour, visual evidence and taste test for fish51. However, criteria for each banding has been presented by WHO within the CL:AIRE report for drinking water and will be used in the assessment. The risk from List 2 compound (EC Dangerous Substance Directive 76/464/EEC) in a freshwater ecosystem is governed by the hardness of the water. Where applicable the hardness was taken into account for these contaminants. Additionally, to run the M-BAT52 model to take into account bioaccessibility of copper, zinc and nickel the Dissolved Oxygen Concentration (DOC), pH and calcium concentrations will be used. Elevated contaminants above limits of detection are presented in Table 6-5 below and all analysis sheets are presented in Appendix D.

Contaminant Units No. of samples

Elevated Result Area Location Assessment

Criteria Source of Criteria

Metals Nickel µg/l 7 32 B WS106 26.84

M-BAT* Copper µg/l 7

54 A WS101 34.59 7.4 B WS106 4.32

Zinc µg/l 7 190 A WS101 68.62

1,500 B WS106 36.56 160 C WS110 47.31

General pH pH Range 6.2 to 9.3

Hardness mg/l CaCO3

Range 16 to 150

Table 6-5: Summary of elevated groundwater test results. Notes: *M-BAT model Site Specific PNEC. Elevated results are likely to be due to colloidal sediments within the groundwater samples and therefore are not considered to be representative of dissolved phases of metals on the site. Indeed, purge water was noted to be heavily sediment laden in samples collected from site. The groundwater encountered on site is considered to be shallow perched water which is unlikely to be representative of general groundwater quality in the area. Clay present on the site should significantly reduce any sub-surface migration and processes include dilution, attenuation and biodegradation will reduce the concentration of contamination.

50 CL:AIRE (2017). “Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater: Guidance on Assessing Petroleum Hydrocarbons Using Existing Hydrological Risk Assessment Methodologies.” 51 EA (2009). “Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater: Supplementary Guidance for Hydrological Risk Assessment.” 52 WFD (2014). “UKTAG River & Lake Assessment Method Specific Pollutants (Metal): Metal Bioavailability Assessment Tool (M-BAT).” Water Framework Directive.



Based on the above, LKC considers the probability of contaminants on site affecting controlled waters is unlikely. Given the medium consequence, a low risk is anticipated in Areas A, B and C and no remediation is required.

Additional Risk Assessments Concrete (Pollutant Linkage 5)

As stated in Section 5, sulphate resistant concrete will not be required at the site. The site was classified as DS-1 AC-1s. Based on the above, the probability of sulphate concentrations affecting buildings is low. Given the consequence is considered to be mild, the risk (pollutant linkage 5) is anticipated to be low and no remediation is required in Areas A, B and C. This should be confirmed with the structural engineer.

Potable Water Supply (Pollutant Linkage 6)

Soil results were compared to United Utilities (UU) guidelines for the selection of potable water pipes in land potentially affected by contamination53. Only contaminants of concern, based on the preliminary conceptual model and ground conditions encountered, were analysed. The following contaminants were not considered to be a risk and therefore not included in the analysis suites: chlorinated compounds, cresols, ethers, nitrobenzene, ketones, aldehydes and amines. The following elevated contaminants were identified:

Elevated TVOCs (i.e. naphthalene) in made ground / topsoil in localised areas of the site.

Typical pipework depths are 0.75mbgl to 1.35mbgl. The pipework will likely be laid into the underlying natural strata after levels have been reduced. Once details of the pipeline location and depths are known a UU Risk Assessment should be undertaken. At this stage, the probability of organic contaminants affecting potable water pipes is unlikely. Given the consequence is considered to be medium, the risk (pollutant linkage 6) is anticipated to be low and no remediation is likely to be required in Areas A, B and C (subject to further risk assessment).

Phytotoxicity (Pollutant Linkage 7)

Soil results were compared to phytotoxic guideline values as outlined in BS388254. No elevated contaminants were identified therefore the probability of phytotoxic contaminants affecting vegetation is considered to be unlikely. With a minor consequence, the risk (pollutant linkage 7) is anticipated to be very low in Areas A, B and C.

Revised Contamination Conceptual Model The preliminary contamination conceptual model (Table 2-6) has been revised following the risk assessments undertaken in Sections 6.1-6.5. The revised contamination conceptual model follows the same methodology and guidance used in

53 UU(2011). “United Utilities Water Supplementary Guidance for the Selection of Water Pipes in Land Potentially Affected by Contamination.” 54 BS (2015). “Specifications for Topsoil and Requirements for Use.” BS3882:2015.



the preliminary contamination conceptual model. The risk matrix is provided in Appendix A. The revised contamination conceptual model for Areas A, B and C is presented in Table 6-6. Where a very low risk is identified no specific remediation is required. Where a low risk is identified, some form of remediation may be required depending on the pollutant linkage, the type and concentration of contaminants present and the proposed development. Where there is a moderate/low risk is identified, an assessment will be undertaken to establish what category the pollutant linkage will fall into. Where LKC identifies a moderate or higher risk, remediation or further investigation work is recommended. Further details of the remedial proposals and a remedial option appraisal are given in Section 9.



Pollutant Linkage Area Pathway Receptor Contaminant Probability Consequence Risk Assessment

PL1

A, B, C

Dermal contact. Inhalation of soil, fibres and dust.

Ingestion of soils, dust, vegetables, soil attached to vegetables.

Windblown dust.

Future residents. Site users. Offsite receptors.

Heavy metals: Arsenic and lead PAHs: B(a)P

Low likelihood Medium Moderate/

Low

Low likelihood as only occasional elevated concentrations identified. Statistical analysis indicates soil is ‘suitable for use’.

Low risk considered appropriate as topsoil/made ground typically only ~0.3m thick and is likely to be removed as part of enabling works

Recommendation: No specific remediation required, although a watching brief should be maintained during earthworks (see Section 9).

A, B, C ACM. Hydrocarbons. Unlikely Medium Low

No ACM identified. No evidence of hydrocarbons identified, and confirmatory testing did not identify elevated concentrations.

Recommendation: No remediation required*1.

PL2 A, B, C

Inhalation of vapours. Migration through permeable strata and preferential pathways.

Future site users. Offsite receptors.

- Volatile Contaminants (no source identified).

Unlikely Medium Low No elevated volatile contaminants encountered on the site. Recommendation: No remediation required.

PL3

A Inhalation of gas. Migration through permeable strata and preferential pathways.

Explosion in confined spaces (methane only).

Future residents. Buildings. Offsite land users.

- Carbon dioxide, Methane

Likely Severe High



B, C Likely Severe High



PL4 A, B, C

Surface Run-off. Migration through permeable strata and preferential pathways

Perched waters migration.

Groundwater (Secondary A Aquifer).

Mobile contaminants: - Metals and PAHs.

Unlikely Medium Low No significant elevated concentrations of contaminants identified. Shallow geology will also impede lateral migration. Recommendation: No remediation required.

PL5 A, B, C Sulphate attack on concrete. Building structure. Sulphate Low

likelihood Mild Low No significantly elevated SO4 or low pH. Recommendation: DS1 AC1 considered appropriate subject to assessment by structural engineer.

Table 6-6: Revised Contamination Conceptual Model. Notes:*1 Although no ACM identified, contractors should be vigilant during earthworks of any potential ACM.



Pollutant Linkage Area Pathway Receptor Contaminant Probability Consequence Risk Assessment

PL6 A, B, C Ingestion of tainted water supply.

Future site users (via potable water).

Organic Contaminants: Naphthalene.

Unlikely Medium Low


Pipeline likely to be laid into natural strata (0.75-1.35m). Recommendation: Barrier pipe unlikely to be required – subject to UURA.

PL7 A, B, C Direct Contact (plant uptake). Flora.

Phytotoxic Contaminants: Zinc, copper, nickel.

Unlikely Minor Very Low No elevated contaminants identified. Recommendation: No remediation required*2.

Table 6-6(cont.): Revised Contamination Conceptual Model. Notes: *2 Although no phytotoxic contaminants identified in soils, the characteristics of the made ground should also be taken into account if it is to be used as a topsoil / growing medium for flora. The material should be assessed against the parameters outlined in Table 1 of BS3882 (not included within this assessment).



7 Waste Disposal Assessment

The soil contamination results as presented in Appendix C have been used to help determine the disposal route should any material be earmarked for off-site disposal. As an initial screen the soil results were inputted into Hazwaste Online™. This is a web-based facility that allows an assessment of contaminant soils and classifies the soils as either hazardous or non-hazardous waste. It is understood that Hazwaste Online™ has been designed to cover the European Waste Catalogue code number 17 05 03 "soil and stones containing dangerous substances” and follows current guidance55,56,57,58,59. Where less than limits of detection (LOD) were recorded, the value of the LOD was inputted. Where applicable relevant metal species were used relating to an ash source, such as metal oxides. This will provide a more realistic classification assessment. The results show that all the samples tested are classified as NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE in Areas A, B and C. The output sheets are provided in Appendix I.

55 EA (2018). “Guidance on the Classification and Assessment of Waste (1st Edition v1.1)”. Technical Guidance WM3. 56 The Hazardous Waste Directive, (HWD, Council Directive 91/689/EC). 57 European Waste Catalogue, 2002 (EWC 2002, Commission Decision 2000/532/EC) as amended by Commission Decision 2001/118/EC, 2001/119/EC and Council Decision 2001/573/E. 58 List of Wastes (England) Regulations 2005. 59 Approved Supply List (Eighth Edition), 2002. ISBN: 0 7176 2368 8.



8 Conclusions

Geotechnical Conclusions of the geotechnical considerations (Section 5) is summarised in Table 8-1 below.

Proposed Development Development of the site for residential end use.

General Ground conditions / Geotechnical Testing

Typically Topsoil / Made Ground topsoil over soft to firm, becoming stiff and very stiff variably sandy gravelly CLAY at the locations of Area A and C. Area B comprises interbedded cohesive and granular deposits.

Bedrock comprising Sandstone and Mudstone was encountered across the site. Mudstone was encountered in the far north-east, north-west and south-west corners of the site, Sandstone was encountered across the majority of the site.

Maximum investigation depth 6.35mbgl within the window sample probeholes and 30.0mbgl within the rotary boreholes.

Made Ground generally <0.5m in thickness, exception to this is at the location of TP104 where Made Ground in excess of 4mbgl was encountered.

Variably silty, sandy, gravelly CLAY to 1.30-5.20mbgl. Bedrock encountered at depths of between 1.30m and 2.80mbgl within the eastern section of Site C.

Groundwater encountered at varying depths, typically within granular deposits. The groundwater is considered representative of perched water pockets.

Allowable Bearing Pressure

82kN/m2 at 1.0-1.2mbgl site A. 103kN/m2 at 1.0-1.2mbgl site C. Variable within Site B.

Anticipated Foundation Type

Traditional shallow foundations recommended from approximately 1mbgl within Areas A & C. If soft ground is encountered, foundations may need to be deepened / widened or ground replaced with compacted granular material.

Ground improvement by vibro granular columns supporting shallow strip foundations within Site B.

Shallow Groundwater

Shallow groundwater identified on the site is considered representative of perched water and may present a constraint to the development.

Suitable drainage should be considered in the proposed development layout. Concrete Requirements Based on BRE Digest 200560 – DS-1 AC-1 recommended.

Coal Mining The site is located within a Development High Risk Area and will require a CMRA to support any future planning applications.

Temporary support of excavation

Trial pits within the cohesive deposits were recorded as stable. Trial pits within granular deposits were recorded as varying between stable and unstable and therefore it is recommended that all excavations where granular strata is encountered is supported or battered back in accordance with guidance contained in CIRIA R97.

Plasticity

Consideration will need to be given to the shrink / swell of the clay strata if it is to be used as founding strata, particularly where trees/hedges are present. Foundations may need to be deepened. A low to medium volume change potential has been calculated for the site.

Road / Pavement Design

Initially a design CBR value of 4% should be adopted for the site. On approval of a site development plan, in-situ testing of proposed access routes should be undertaken to obtain a more applicable CBR value.

Table 8-1: Summary Risk Table.

60 BRE (2005).”Concrete in Aggressive Ground.” Special Digest 1.



Contamination Assessment A revised contamination conceptual model for Areas A, B and C has been produced by LKC which is summarised in Table 8-2 below (more detailed model provided in Section 6).

Pollutant Linkage Risk Recommendations

1

Contaminants posing a risk to future site users via dermal contact, ingestion and inhalation (of soil, dust, fibres and vegetables).

Moderate/ Low (metals,

PAHs)

Occasional elevated concentrations identified. Statistical analysis indicates soil is ‘suitable for use’.

Low risk considered appropriate. Recommendation: No specific remediation required, although a watching brief should be maintained during earthworks (see Section 9).

Low (ACM,

hydrocarbons)

No ACM identified. No evidence of hydrocarbons identified. Recommendation: No remediation required*1.

2 Volatile contaminants posing a risk to future site users via the inhalation of vapours.

Low

No elevated volatile contaminants encountered on the site.


3

Gas posing a risk to buildings and future site users via the migration of gas into building causing explosion and asphyxiation.

High (Area A)



High (Area B, C)



4

Mobile contamination posing a risk to controlled waters via the migration through permeable strata.

Low

No significant elevated concentrations of contaminants identified.

Shallow geology will also impede lateral migration.


5 Sulphate posing a risk to building via direct contact (sulphate attack).

Low No significantly elevated SO4 or low pH. Recommendation: DS1 AC1 considered appropriate subject to assessment by structural engineer.

6 Organic contaminants posing a risk to water pipes. Low


Pipeline likely to be laid into natural strata (0.75-1.35m).

Recommendation: Barrier pipe unlikely to be required – subject to UURA.

7 Phytotoxic metals posing a risk to flora via root uptake. Very Low

No elevated contaminants identified. Recommendation: No remediation required.

Table 8-2: Summary Risk Table. Remedial recommendations are presented in Section 9.



9 Recommendations and Remedial Strategy

The recommendations provided below are considered appropriate for the site based on the site investigation work undertaken. LKC should stress that no remediation, enabling works or designing works should take place until Regulatory approval has been obtained.

Remediation and Validation Recommendations Table 9-1 details the further works and remedial recommendations / requirements for Areas A, B and C. The table shows work required pre-construction (i.e. during earthworks) and during / post construction.


Pre-

Cons

truc

tion

ALL

Earthworks Inspections / Unexpected Contamination Areas A, B, C The relevant contractors should be briefed that during development works at the site should any unusual ground conditions and / or visual or olfactory evidence of contamination (including asbestos containing material) be encountered at the site, LKC and the Local Authority should be informed, and further assessment of the material may be required. Should asbestos be identified during groundworks, precautions should be taken to ensure the safety of the construction workers and nearby land users. It would be advisable to introduce an asbestos management strategy in line with CIRIA C73361.

Log of work undertaken including photographs. Details of any sampling undertaken and validation of any potential additional remedial work.

3

Gas Protection Measures Area A - In line with CS3 as per UK guidance62,63. Areas - B, C - In line with CS2 as per UK guidance. Gas protection measures should include the following measures to attain the correct gas protection scores:

Passive subfloor or active subfloor ventilation system.

Methane and carbon dioxide resistant membrane installed as per manufacturer’s instructions.

Ventilation of confined spaces within the building.

Well-constructed reinforced suspended, raft or cast in situ ground slab.

Minimum penetration of ground slab by services.

All joints and penetrations to be sealed. It may be advisable to undertake a cost benefit analysis to establish the most cost effected solution. The following

Supply and review of foundation designs. Photographic evidence of sub-floor void, ventilation and suitably sealed gas membrane. Validation of gas protection measures should be in line with CIRIA 73564

Table 9-1: Further work, remediation and validation requirements.

61 CIRIA (2014). “Asbestos in Soil and Made Ground: A Guide to Understanding and Managing Risks”. C733. 62 CIRIA (2007). “Assessing Risks Posed by Hazardous Ground Gases to Buildings.” CIRIA C665 63 BSI (2015). “Code of Practice for the Design of Protective Measures for Methane and Carbon Dioxide Ground Gases for new buildings.” BS8485:2015. 64 CIRIA (2014). “Good Practice on the Testing and Verification of Protection Systems for Building Against Hazardous Ground Gas”. CIRIA C735.




6 Potable Water Pipes Areas A, B & C It is recommended that a Water Pipeline Assessment is undertaken once the location and depth of potable water pipes are known.

Delivery Notes of Pipe Material. Photographs of the Installed Pipe.

1, 2, 4, 5,

7

Areas A, B & C No remediation anticipated with respect to PL1 (direct contact), PL2 (inhalation of vapours), PL4 (controlled waters), PL5 (concrete), and PL7 (phytotoxicity); however, this needs to be confirmed once additional work has been completed.

Table 9-1(cont.): Further work, remediation and validation requirements. In addition to the above remediation, it is recommended that a full coal mining risk assessment is undertaken on the site. Voids and broken drilling was encountered in rotary boreholes undertaken as part of this investigation.

Other Considerations Grubbing out of in-ground structures

It is recommended that in-ground structures are grubbed out as part of the groundworks.

Re-use of Site Won Material

To ensure material is compliant with appropriate waste regulations, any site won material re-used onsite should be in recourse to appropriate exemptions. A U1 and T5 exemption should be registered. This will allow the following to be used onsite or brought in for use onsite (refer to guidance for types of waste that can be used):

5,000 tonnes (c. 2,500m3) treatment of crushed concrete / stone. 1,000 tonnes (c. 500m3) use of non-hazardous soil 5,000 tonnes (c. 2,500m3) use of clays, sand, gravel, brick, concrete, stone etc. 50,000 tonnes (c. 25,000m3) use of bituminous material to be used in roadways.

A Materials Management Plan (MMP) with recourse to the CL:AIRE Code of Practice may be required if volumes exceed exemption limits. This must be registered before material movement starts onsite. If an MMP is required, this needs to be registered by a Qualified Person (QP) and there must be ‘certainty of use’ for any material re-used onsite or exported to site to ensure there is no ‘sham recovery’. For all the above material will need to be tested at the rate and analytical suites presented in Table 9-2.

Topsoil Growing Medium

Some of the existing made ground was noted to contain material (brick, glass, ash, pottery, clinker) that is not expected to be a suitable growing medium. A topsoil cover of approximately 150mm is recommended in gardens and soft landscaping areas if this material is left in-situ.



Health & Safety Considerations

In working with, removing or treating any contaminating material it is important that any potential risks associated with the actual site works are mitigated by good environmental management of the site during the remedial phases. Standard health and safety precautions (as per HSE guidance65) should be adopted by all workers involved with site enabling and construction works.

Validation of Subsoil / Topsoil Chemical validation of all imported soils to be used on site in gardens and soft landscaping areas should be undertaken. Imported soils should be accompanied by a certificate of analysis and source details. A summary of the required imported material sampling requirements is presented in Table 9-2. Ideally, the material should be sampled at source to prevent double handling if soil fails. However, where this is not possible then material imported should be segregated based on source and soil type. Validation samples should be taken prior to placement in gardens to ensure suitability for use.

Material Type Source Suite of

Analysis Sampling Rate*

Topsoil Greenfield Suite A

1 sample per 50m3 Brownfield / Unknown Suite B

Subsoil

Brownfield / Unknown Suite B 1 sample per 150m3 Site won natural material /

greenfield Suite A

First Generation i.e. quarried sand (subsoil) or stone (break layer)

No testing is required. Certification of material provenance is required. Physical Stone

Break Layer Recycled Stone (6F2 / screened) Suite B 1 sample per 500m3 Table 9-2: Sampling requirements for imported soils. Notes: Suite A - Heavy metals, pH, water soluble sulphate, speciated PAH, soil organic matter and asbestos screen. Suite B - Heavy metals, pH, water soluble sulphate, speciated PAH, phenol, total and free cyanide, soil organic matter, asbestos screen, banded petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH CWG), BTEX, MTBE. *Minimum sampling rate of 3 samples per source. Any soil with visual or olfactory evidence of hydrocarbons should be rejected. In addition, it should be ensured that the matrix of the topsoil is suitable as a growing medium and no undesirable material is present (in line with BS388266). LKC advise this information is provided by the supplier before material is imported onto site.

Site Completion Report It is recommended that any remediation carried out on the site is validated by a third party and suitable documentary evidence provided in a Site Completion Report, such as photographs, consignment documents and analytical results. This should include as a minimum:

Verification testing of all imported soil for garden and soft landscaping areas. Information on the installation of protective pipes and / or sterile trenches.

65 HSE (1991). “Protection of Workers and the General Public During Development of Contaminated Land” London HMSO. 66 BS (2015). “Specifications for Topsoil and Requirements for use.” BS3882:2015.



Validation of gas protection measures. Details of any unexpected contamination identified onsite, suitably risk assessed and / or validated.

The Site Completion Report will assist the Local Authority in the discharge of any future relevant planning condition and will also be of use to solicitors acting on behalf of any prospective conveyancer who may have concerns over the former use of the site.


The LK Group December 2019 Ref: LKC 19 1374

Figures

1,000

Scale: 1:25,000metres

0

Figure 1: Site Location Plan, Ellison Fold Way, Blackburn

Drawn: August 2019 Scale: 1:25,000 @ A4 (see scale bar)

Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right 2010

100

SCALE (Metres)

0 50

SITE B

SITE A

SITE C

Site Boundary

Site:

Client:

Title:

LKC 19 1374Scale (See Scale Bar):

See Scale BarDrawn By: Drawn:

AC

KEY

N

Extract from: Envirotec Site Service LtdDrawing Ref: Site Location Plan, No.ESS/EFW/SoW (May 2019)

Sampling Locations and features annotated by LK Consult Ltd are approximateand are based upon observed measurements unless otherwise stated. Do notscale from this drawing and work from marked dimensions only. All dimensionsand features should be confirmed on site by the Contractor. Where this drawingincludes information provided to LK Consult Ltd by others, LK Consult Ltd givesno warranty, representation or assurance as to the accuracy of such information.

Job No.:

Checked By:

HF

Figure:

2Revision:

Ellison Fold Way, Blackburn

Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council

Site Boundary Plan

Sep 2019

100

SCALE (Metres)

0 50

SITE B

SITE A

SITE C

WS102WS101

WS104

WS103

WS105

WS107

WS106

WS110

WS108

WS109

WS111

WS112

WS113

RBHB

RBHC

RBHA

TP101

TP102

TP103

TP104

TP105

TP106

TP107

TP108

TP109

TP110

TP111

TP112

TP113

TP114

TP115

TP116

TP117

Site Boundary

Machine ExcavatedTrial Pit (TP)

Rotary Borehole (RB)

Window SampleBorehole (WS)

Site:

Client:

Title:

LKC 19 1374Scale (See Scale Bar):

See Scale BarDrawn By: Drawn:

AC

KEY

N

Extract from: Envirotec Site Service LtdDrawing Ref: Site Location Plan, No.ESS/EFW/SoW (May 2019)

Sampling Locations and features annotated by LK Consult Ltd are approximateand are based upon observed measurements unless otherwise stated. Do notscale from this drawing and work from marked dimensions only. All dimensionsand features should be confirmed on site by the Contractor. Where this drawingincludes information provided to LK Consult Ltd by others, LK Consult Ltd givesno warranty, representation or assurance as to the accuracy of such information.

Job No.:

Checked By:

HF

Figure:

3Revision:

Ellison Fold Way, Blackburn


Site Investigation Location Plan

Sep 2019



Appendix A

Risk Matrix



Risk Evaluation The method for risk evaluation is a qualitative method of interpreting the output from the risk estimation stage of the assessment, based on CIRIA 55267. It involves the classification of the:

Magnitude of the potential consequence (severity) of the risk occurring (Table A). Magnitude if the probability (likelihood) of the risk occurring (Table B).

Consequence (Severity)

Classification Definition Example Severe - Short term (acute) risk to human health likely to

results in ‘significant harm’ as defined by the Environment Protection Act 1990, Part IIA.

- Short term risk of pollution (note: water Resources Act contains no scope for considering significance of pollution) of sensitive water resource.

- Catastrophic damage to buildings/properties. - A short-term risk to a particular ecosystem, or

organism forming part of such ecosystem (note: the definition of ecological systems within the Draft Circular on Contaminated Land, DETR, 2000).

- High Concentrations of cyanide on the surface of an informal recreation area.

- Major spillage of contaminants from site into controlled waters.

- Explosion, causing building collapse (can also equate to short term human health risk if buildings are occupied).

Medium - Chronic damage to Human Health (‘significant harm’ as defined in DETR, 2000).

- Pollution of sensitive water resources (note Water Resources Act contains no scope for considering significance of pollution).

- A significant change in a particular ecosystem, or organism forming part of such ecosystem.

- Concentrations of a contaminant from site exceed generic, or site-specific assessment criteria.

- Leaching of contaminants from a site to a major or minor aquifer (Principal and Secondary).

- Death of a species within a designated nature reserve.

Mild - Pollution of non-sensitive water resources. - Significant damage to crops, buildings, structures

and services (‘significant harm’ as defined in DETR, 2000).

- Damage to sensitive buildings/structures/services or the environment.

- Pollution of non-classified groundwater. - Damage to building rendering it unsafe to

occupy (e.g. foundation damage resulting in instability).

Minor - Harm, although not necessarily significant harm, which may result in a financial loss, or expenditure to resolve.

- Non-permanent health effects to human health (easily prevented by means such as personal protective clothing etc).

- Easily repairable damage to buildings, structures and services.

- The presence of contaminants at such concentrations that protective equipment is required during site works.

- The loss of plants in a landscaping scheme.

- Discoloration of concrete.

Table A. Classification of Consequence

Probability (Likelihood) Classification Definition High Likelihood

- There is a pollutant linkage and an event that either appears very likely in the short term and almost inevitable over the long term, or there is evidence at the receptor of harm or pollution.

Likely - There is a pollutant linkage and all the elements are present and in the right place, which means that it is probable that an event will occur.

- Circumstances are such that an event is not inevitable, but possible in the short term and likely over the long term.

Low Likelihood

- There is a pollutant linkage and circumstances are possible under which an event could occur. - However, it is by no means certain that even over a longer period such event would take place

and is less likely in the shorter term. Unlikely - There is a pollutant linkage, but circumstances are such that it is improbable that an event

would occur in the very long term. Table B. Classification of Probability.

67 CIRIA C552 (2001) Contaminated Land Risk Assessment - A Guide to Good Practice.



These classifications are then compared to indicate the risk presented by each pollutant linkage (Table C). It is important that this classification is only applied where there is a possibility (which can range from high likelihood to unlikely) of a pollutant linkage existing.

Consequence Severe Medium Mild Minor

Prob

abili

ty

High Likelihood Very High Risk

High Risk

Moderate Risk

Moderate / Low Risk

Likely High Risk

Moderate Risk

Moderate / Low Risk

Low Risk

Low Likelihood Moderate Risk

Moderate / Low Risk

Low Risk

Very Low Risk

Unlikely Moderate / Low Risk

Low Risk

Very Low Risk

Very Low Risk

Table C. Comparison of Consequence against Probability Once the risk has been determined the corresponding action can be assessed (Table D).

Risk Action Required

Very High Risk

- There is a high probability that severe harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard, OR, there is evidence that sever harm to a designated receptor is currently happening.

- This risk, if realised, is likely to results in a substantial liability. - Urgent investigation (if not already undertaken) and remediation are likely to be required.

High Risk - Harm is likely to arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard. - Realisation of the risk is likely to present a substantial liability. - Urgent investigation (if not undertaken already) is required and remedial works may be

necessary in the short term and are likely over the longer term.

Moderate Risk

- It is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard. However, it is either relatively unlikely that any such harm would be severe, or if any harm were to occur it is more likely that the harm would be relatively mild.

- Investigation (if not already undertaken) is normally required to clarify the risk and to determine the potential liability. Some remedial works may be required in the longer term.

Low Risk - It is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard, but it is likely that this harm, if realised, would at worst normally be mild.

Very Low Risk - There is a low possibility that harm could arise to a receptor. In the event of such harm being realised it is not likely to be severe.

Table D. Description of the Classification and Likely Action Required. Where a very low risk is identified no specific remediation is required. Where a low risk is identified, some form of remediation may be required depending on the pollutant linkage, the type and concentration of contaminants present and the proposed development. Where there is a moderate/low risk is identified, an assessment will be undertaken to establish what category the pollutant linkage will fall into. Where LKC identifies a moderate or higher risk, remediation or further investigation work is recommended.



Appendix B

Profile Logs

LK CONSULT LTDEton Business Park, Eton Hill Road, Radcliffe, M26 2ZSTel: 0161 763 7200 web: www.thelkgroup.com

Location (dGPS)

Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er

LegendDescriptionDepth

(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)

Level(mOD)Field Records

Remarks Scale(approx)

LoggedBy

Figure No.LKC 19 1374.RBHA

1:100 MW

Ellison Fold Way, Darwen


LKC

LKC 19 1374

RBHA

BoreholeNumber

206.97

370167.3 E 422255.7 N13/09/2019

Produced by the GEOtechnical DAtabase SYstem (GEODASY) © all rights reserved

Casing Diameter

TCR SCR RQD FI

Machine : Comacchio 205

Flush : Mist

Core Dia : mm

Method : Rotary Cored

(0.40) Grass onto TOPSOIL.206.57 0.40

(3.80)

Orange brown CLAY.

202.77 4.20

(10.80)

Brown grey SANDSTONE.

191.97 15.00

(3.00)

Dark grey SILTSTONE.

188.97 18.00 Light grey SILTSTONE.

1/2

(4.00)

184.97 22.00

(8.00)


176.97 30.00Complete at 30.00m


Location (dGPS)

Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy

Figure No.LKC 19 1374.RBHA

1:100 MW



LKC

LKC 19 1374

RBHA

BoreholeNumber

206.97

370167.3 E 422255.7 N13/09/2019


Casing Diameter

TCR SCR RQD FI


Flush : Mist

Core Dia : mm

Method : Rotary Cored2/2


Location (dGPS)

Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy

Figure No.LKC 19 1374.RBHB

1:100 MW



LKC

LKC 19 1374

RBHB

BoreholeNumber

210.15

370210.3 E 422291.8 N13/09/2019


Casing Diameter

TCR SCR RQD FI


Flush : Mist

Core Dia : mm

Method :

(3.00)

Firm brown CLAY

207.15 3.00

(13.00)

Brown grey SANDSTONE.

194.15 16.00

(3.00)


191.15 19.00 Light grey SILTSTONE.

1/2

(3.00)

188.15 22.00

(8.00)


Thin band of SANDSTONE encountered at 30.00mbgl.180.15 30.00

Complete at 30.00m


Location (dGPS)

Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy

Figure No.LKC 19 1374.RBHB

1:100 MW



LKC

LKC 19 1374

RBHB

BoreholeNumber

210.15

370210.3 E 422291.8 N13/09/2019


Casing Diameter

TCR SCR RQD FI


Flush : Mist

Core Dia : mm

Method :2/2


Location (dGPS)

Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy

Figure No.LKC 19 1374.RBHC

1:100 MW



LKC

LKC 19 1374

RBHC

BoreholeNumber

215.75

370265 E 422391.6 N14/09/2019


Casing Diameter

TCR SCR RQD FI


Flush : Mist

Core Dia : mm

Method :

(0.30) Grass onto TOPSOIL.215.45 0.30

(4.20)

Orange brown CLAY.

211.25 4.50

(1.10)Brown grey SANDSTONE.

210.15 5.60

(0.90)VOID.

Total flush loss from 5.60mbgl.

209.25 6.50

(1.50)

Soft broken drilling.

207.75 8.00

(22.00)

Solid drilling.

1/2

185.75 30.00Complete at 30.00m


Location (dGPS)

Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy

Figure No.LKC 19 1374.RBHC

1:100 MW



LKC

LKC 19 1374

RBHC

BoreholeNumber

215.75

370265 E 422391.6 N14/09/2019


Casing Diameter

TCR SCR RQD FI


Flush : Mist

Core Dia : mm

Method :2/2


Location (Handheld GPS)

Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)

Level(mOD)Sample / Tests

1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP101



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP101Number

206.46

370149.2 E 422196.6 N10/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks

Scale (approx) Logged By Figure No.

Excavation Method

Machine excavation to 3.30mbgl.

0.5x2.0x3.3m

(0.30)MADE GROUND: Dark brown slightly gravelly clayey SAND with occasional rootlets, coal, rare brick (whole and fragments) and pottery. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.206.16 0.30

(3.00)

POSSIBLE REWORKED: Firm to stiff consistency brown mottled grey slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with rare coal, sandstone cobbles and rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subrounded to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

203.16 3.30Complete at 3.30m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID=<0.1ppm

Trial pit dry.Trial pit stable.Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.CBR at 0.0mbgl = 3%.

0.30-1.30 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm

CBR at 0.3mbgl = 4%.CBR at 0.6mbgl = 3%.

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP102



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP102Number

207.29

370170.1 E 422217.8 N10/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x3.1m

(0.50)

MADE GROUND: Dark brown slightly gravelly clayey SAND with occasional rootlets, rare brick (whole and fragments), coal and ash. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to rounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

206.79 0.50

(2.60)

POSSIBLE REWORKED: Firm to stiff consistency grey mottled orange slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with occasional rootlets, rare coal fragments and sandstone cobbles. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

204.19 3.10Complete at 3.10m

0.00-0.50 D1 PID=0.1ppm

Trial pit dry.Trial pit stable.Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.CBR at 0.0mbgl = 2%.CBR at 0.3mbgl = 2%.CBR at 0.6mbgl = 12%.

0.50-1.50 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm

1.50-3.00 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:40 PP LKC 19 1374.TP103



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP103Number

205.62

370142.8 E 422234.1 N10/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x4.0m

1

(0.30) MADE GROUND: Dark brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with occasional rootlets, rare ash, brick (whole and fragments) and coal. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to rounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

205.32 0.30

(1.70)

POSSIBLE REWORKED: Firm to stiff consistency grey mottled brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with occasional rootlets and rare coal. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subrounded to subangular comprising mudstone.

203.62 2.00

(2.00)

Brownish grey very clayey gravelly SAND. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone.

201.62 4.00Complete at 4.00m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID=0.1ppm

Water strike at 3.40mbgl.Trial pit stable.Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.

0.30-1.30 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm

CBR at 0.0mbgl = 4%.CBR at 0.3mbgl = 3%.CBR at 0.6mbgl = 4%.

2.00-3.00 D3 PID=<0.1ppm2.00-4.00 B4 PID=<0.1ppm

Water strike(1) at 3.40m.

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:40 PP LKC 19 1374.TP104



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP104Number

206.35

370152.3 E 422259.8 N10/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x4.0m

1(0.30) MADE GROUND: Dark brown gravelly sandy CLAY with

frequent rootlets, rare brick (whole and fragments), glass and metal fragments. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to rounded comprising mudstone.

206.05 0.30

(3.70)

MADE GROUND: Firm to stiff consistency brown mottled grey gravelly sandy CLAY with rare coal, metal and sandstone cobbles. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

202.35 4.00Complete at 4.00m

0.00-0.20 D1 PID=<0.1ppm

Perched water at 0.30mbgl.Trial pit stable.Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.


CBR at 0.0mgbl = 4%.CBR at 0.3mbgl = 4%.

0.50-1.20 D2 PID=<0.1ppm

CBR at 0.6mbgl = 3%.

0.50-4.00 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:20 PP LKC 19 1374.TP105



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP105Number

210.32

370212.5 E 422275 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x3.0m

1

(0.20)TOPSOIL: Dark brown gravelly clayey SAND with frequent rootlets and rare roots. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.210.12 0.20

(1.30)

Firm to stiff consistency medium strength brown mottled grey slightly gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

208.82 1.50

(1.50)

Greyish brown very clayey gravelly SAND with rare coal. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

207.32 3.00Complete at 3.00m

0.00-0.20 D1 PID=0.1ppm

Perched water at 1.50mbgl.Trial pit stable.Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.

0.20-1.20 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm


0.50 PP 49.05kPa

1.00 PP 61.31kPa

Water strike(1) at 1.50m.1.50-3.00 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP106



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP106Number

211.59

370236.8 E 422310.7 N10/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x3.0m

1

(0.30)TOPSOIL: Dark brown gravelly very clayey SAND with occasional rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subrounded to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

211.29 0.30

(0.80)

POSSIBLE REWORKED: Soft to firm consistency brown mottled orange slightly gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone.

210.49 1.10

(1.20)

COAL.

209.29 2.30

(0.70)

Grey clayey sandy GRAVEL. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subangular comprising mudstone.

208.59 3.00Complete at 3.00m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID=<0.1ppm

Perched water at 1.10mbgl.Trial pit stable.Handheld GPS used for elevation and location.CBR at 0.0mbgl = 3%.

0.30-1.10 D2 PID=<0.1ppm


Water strike(1) at 1.10m.1.10-2.30 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

2.30-3.00 DB4 PID=<0.1ppm

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:20 PP LKC 19 1374.TP107



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP107Number

212.00

370246.1 E 422285.9 N10/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x1.5x3.0m

(0.30)

TOPSOIL: Dark brown slightly gravelly clayey SAND with occasional rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

211.70 0.30

(1.70)

Firm to stiff consistency medium strength brown mottled grey sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium.

210.00 2.00

(1.00)

Greyish brown gravelly clayey SAND. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subangular comprising mudstone. (Weathered bedrock).

209.00 3.00Complete at 3.00m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID=<0.1ppm

Trial pit dry.Trial pit stable.Handheld GPS used for elevation and location.CBR at 0.0mbgl = 3%.CBR at 0.3mbgl = 4%.

0.30-1.30 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm


2.00-3.00 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP108



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP108Number

210.01

370198.8 E 422327.7 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x2.4m

(0.20) TOPSOIL: Dark brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with occasional rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

209.81 0.20

(2.20)

Firm to stiff consistency medium strength brown mottled grey gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone.

207.61 2.40Complete at 2.40m

0.00-0.20 D1

Trial pit dry.Trial pit stable.

0.20-1.20 D2

Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.

0.20-2.00 B3


0.50 PP 49.05kPa

1.00 PP 73.58kPa

1.50 PP 49.05kPa

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP109



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP109Number

211.89

370215.8 E 422356.7 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x2.0m

(0.30)MADE GROUND: Dark brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with frequent rootlets, rare brick and coal. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

211.59 0.30

(1.70)

Firm to stiff consistency medium strength brown mottled grey gravelly very sandy CLAY becoming darker with depth. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subangular comprising mudstone.

209.89 2.00Complete at 2.00m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID=<0.1ppm


0.30-1.30 D2 PID=0.1ppm


0.30-2.00 B3 PID=<0.1ppm


0.50 PP 49.05kPa

1.00 PP 73.58kPa

1.50 PP 49.05kPa

2.00 PP 49.05kPa

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP110



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP110Number

211.10

370209.1 E 422386.9 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.3x2.0x3.0m

(0.30)TOPSOIL: Dark brown gravelly sandy CLAY with occasional rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

210.80 0.30

(1.20)

Firm to soft consistency low to medium strength brown mottled grey slightly grey gravelly very sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subrounded to subangular comprising mudstone.

209.60 1.50

(1.50)

Firm consistency medium to high strength grey gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone.

208.10 3.00Complete at 3.00m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID=<0.1ppm


0.30-1.30 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm


0.50 PP 24.53kPa

1.00 PP 49.05kPa

1.50 PP 36.79kPa1.50-2.50 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

2.00 PP 98.1kPa

2.50 PP 73.58kPa

3.00 PP 49.05kPa

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP111



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP111Number

213.69

370235.8 E 422364.7 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x3.0m

(0.30)TOPSOIL: Dark brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with frequent rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

213.39 0.30

(1.00)

Firm to soft consistency low to medium strength brown mottled grey very sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium.

212.39 1.30

(1.70)

Firm consistency medium to high strength grey gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subangular comprising mudstone.

210.69 3.00Complete at 3.00m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID=0.1ppm


0.30-1.30 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm


0.50 PP 24.53kPa

1.00 PP 49.05kPa

1.30-3.00 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

2.00 PP 73.58kPa

2.50 PP 98.1kPa

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP112



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP112Number

217.15

370291.3 E 422362.6 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x2.4m

(0.30)MADE GROUND: Dark brown slightly gravelly clayey SAND with occasional rootlets, rare brick and pottery. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subrounded to angular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

216.85 0.30

(1.00)

Firm to soft consistency medium to low strength brown mottled grey very sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium.

215.85 1.30

(1.10)


214.75 2.40Complete at 2.40m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID=<0.1ppm


0.30-1.30 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm


0.50 PP 24.53kPa

1.00 PP 49.05kPa

1.30-2.30 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

1.50 PP 98.1kPa

2.00 PP 73.58kPa

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP113



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP113Number

219.47

370318.8 E 422396.3 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x2.6m

(0.30)TOPSOIL: Dark brown slightly gravelly clayey SAND with frequent rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

219.17 0.30

(1.20)


217.97 1.50

(1.10)


216.87 2.60Complete at 2.60m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID=<0.1ppm


0.30-1.30 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm


0.50 PP 24.53kPa

1.00 PP 49.05kPa

1.50 PP 73.58kPa1.50-2.50 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

2.00 PP 61.31kPa

2.50 PP 85.84kPa

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP114



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP114Number

220.24

370328.6 E 422416.9 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0.x2..0m

1

(0.40)

TOPSOIL: Dark brown slightly gravelly clayey SAND with frequent rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

219.84 0.40

(1.00)

Firm to soft consistency low to medium strength brown mottled grey slightly gravelly very sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine, subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

218.84 1.40

(0.60)

Firm consistency medium to high strength grey gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to angular comprising mudstone.

218.24 2.00Complete at 2.00m

0.00-0.40 D1 PID=<0.1ppm

Trial pit stable.Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.CBR at 0.0mbgl = 3%.CBR at 0.3mbgl = 2%.CBR at 0.6mbgl = 5%.

Water strike(1) at 0.40m.0.40-1.40 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm

Water strike at 0.40mbgl.

0.50PP 36.79kPa

1.00 PP 49.05kPa

1.40-2.00 B3 PID=<0.1ppm1.50 PP 85.84kPa

2.00 PP 98.1kPa

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP115



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP115Number

223.33

370369 E 422392.3 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x3.0m

(0.20) MADE GROUND: Dark brown slightly gravelly clayey SAND with occasional rootlets, rare coal and glass. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

223.13 0.20

(0.80)


222.33 1.00

(1.20)

Firm consistency medium to high strength grey gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

221.13 2.20

(0.80)

Firm consistency high strength light grey sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium.

220.33 3.00Complete at 3.00m

0.00-0.20 D1 PID=0.1ppm

Trial pit dry.Trial pit stable.

0.20-1.00 DB2 PID=<0.1ppm

Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.CBR at 0.0mbgl = 3%.CBR at 0.3mbgl = 6%.CBR at 0.6mbgl = 8%.

0.50 PP 24.53kPa

1.00 PP 36.79kPa1.00-2.20 B3 PID=<0.1ppm

1.50 PP 49.05kPa

2.00 PP 61.31kPa

2.20-3.00 B4 PID=<0.1ppm

2.50 PP 110.36kPa

3.00 PP 98.1kPa

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP116



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP116Number

226.61

370392.9 E 422420.4 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x3.0m

(0.20) TOPSOIL: Dark brown slightly gravelly clayey SAND with frequent rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

226.41 0.20

(2.80)

Dark grey slightly clayey sandy GRAVEL. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subangular comprising mudstone.

223.61 3.00Complete at 3.00m

0.00-0.20 D1

Water strike at 1.00mbgl.Trial pit collapsing at 1.50mbgl.

0.20-3.00 B3

Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.CBR at 0.0mbgl = 3%.

0.30-1.20 D1


1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)


1:25 PP LKC 19 1374.TP117



LKC

LKC 19 1374

TP117Number

231.45

370424 E 422445.7 N11/09/2019


Trial Pit

Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Remarks


Excavation Method


0.5x2.0x3.0m

1

(0.20) TOPSOIL: Dark brown slightly gravelly clayey SAND with occasional rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

231.25 0.20

(1.50)

Firm consistency medium strength grey sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium.

229.75 1.70

(1.30)

Grey clayey sandy GRAVEL. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium, angular to subangular comprising mudstone.

228.45 3.00Complete at 3.00m

0.00-0.20 D1 PID=0.1ppm

Water strike at 2.00mbgl.Trial pit collapsing at 2.20mbgl.

0.20-1.20 D2 PID=<0.1ppm


0.20-1.70 B3 PID=<0.1ppm


1.00 PP 49.05kPa

1.50 PP 61.31kPa

1.70-3.00 B4 PID=<0.1ppm


1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er

Legend InstrDescriptionDepth

(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy

Figure No.lkc 19 1374.WS101

1:40 HM



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS101Number

204.44

370109.5 E 422180.7 N10/09/2019-11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method

Drive-in Windowless Sample to 6.35mbgl.

(0.20) MADE GROUND: Blackish brown slightly gravelly silty CLAY with frequent rootlets. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone.

204.24 0.20

(1.00)

MADE GROUND: Yellowish brown grey mottled slightly gravelly slightly sandy CLAY with rare glass, rootlets and coal fragments. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular to rounded comprising sandstone and quartz.

Less yellow and more grey beneath 0.80mbgl. Rootlets between 0.80-1.20mbgl.

203.24 1.20

(1.80)

Firm to stiff consistencey brownish yellow slightly gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone.

201.44 3.00

(3.35)

Firm to stiff consistency dark greyish brown slightly sandy gravelly CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to subrounded comprising sandstone and quartz.

198.09 6.35Complete at 6.35m

Borehole dry. Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.

0.20-1.20 D1

1.20-1.65 SPT N=9 1,2/2,3,2,2

2.00-2.45 SPT N=8 2,2/2,2,2,22.00-2.20 DB2

2.50-3.00 U3

3.00-3.45 SPT N=12 2,2/3,3,3,3

3.50-4.00 B4

4.00-4.45 SPT N=22 4,4/5,5,6,6

5.00-5.45 SPT N=22 5,5/6,6,5,5

5.45-5.90 SPT N=33 10,10/8,8,8,9

5.90-6.35 SPT N=48 10,10/12,12,13,11

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 HM



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS102Number

207.32

370166.7 E 422194.9 N10/09/2019-11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


1

(0.60)

MADE GROUND: Black slightly gravelly sandy clayey SILT with rare glass fragments, brick fragments and clinker. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone.

206.72 0.60

(0.60)

Firm to stiff consistency yellowish brown slightly sandy gravelly CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular comprising sandstone.

206.12 1.20

(1.30)

Firm to stiff consistency dark greyish brown slightly gravelly slightly sandy CLAY with rare coal fragments and rootlets. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to rounded comprising sandstone. Strata wet (possible reworked clay).

204.82 2.50

(2.95)

Firm to stiff consistency greyish brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to subrounded comprising sandstone.

201.87 5.45Complete at 5.45m

0.00-0.60 D1


0.60-1.20 D2

1.20-1.65 SPT N=18 1,2/2,4,7,51.20-2.20 D3

1.50-2.00 U4

2.00-2.45 SPT N=16 2,2/2,4,5,5

3.00-3.45 SPT N=20 2,3/3,4,6,73.00-3.50 DB5

Water strike(1) at 4.00m.4.00-4.45 SPT N=22 3,3/4,5,6,7

5.00-5.45 SPT N=22 3,4/5,5,6,6

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 HM



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS103Number

207.05

370167.5 E 422239.4 N10/09/2019-11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


1

(0.60)

MADE GROUND: Black slightly sandy silty CLAY with abundant rootlets. Sand is fine to medium.

206.45 0.60

(1.40)

Firm to stiff consistency greyish brown orange mottled slightly gravelly slightly sandy CLAY with rare coal fragments. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to rounded comprising sandstone.

205.05 2.00

(3.22)

Firm to stiff consistency medium strength greyish brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular comprising sandstone.

201.83 5.22Complete at 5.22m

0.00-0.60 D1

Sampler refusal at 5.20mbgl on possible sandstone cobble. Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.

0.60-1.20 D2

1.20-1.65 SPT N=11 1,2/2,3,3,3

1.50-2.00 U3

2.00 SV 58kPa2.00-2.45 SPT N=12 2,3/3,3,3,3

2.50-3.00 DB4

3.00-3.45 SPT N=15 2,3/3,3,4,5

Water strike(1) at 4.00m.4.00-4.45 SPT N=16 2,3/3,4,4,5

5.00-5.22 SPT 50/70 12,12/50

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 HM



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS104Number

206.00

370145.5 E 422223.3 N10/09/2019-11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


(0.30) MADE GROUND: Black slightly gravelly slightly sandy CLAY with rare coal fragments. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone.

205.70 0.30

(2.10)

FIrm to stiff consistency yellowish brown becoming greyish brown orange mottled slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with rare coal fragments. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to subrounded comprising sandstone.

203.60 2.40

(0.60)

Soft to firm consistency slightly greyish brown gravelly silty CLAY. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to subrounded comprising sandstone. Increasing gravel content with depth.

203.00 3.00

(2.45)

Stiff to very stiff consistency gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular comprising sandstone.

200.55 5.45Complete at 5.45m

0.00-0.30 D1


0.30-1.30 D2

1.20-1.65 SPT N=11 2,2/2,3,3,3

2.00-2.45 SPT N=9 3,3/2,2,3,2

2.50-3.00 B3

3.00-3.45 SPT N=17 3,3/3,6,4,4

4.00-4.45 SPT N=33 7,8/10,8,7,8

5.00-5.45 SPT N=29 5,5/6,6,8,9

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 HM



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS105Number

211.75

370241.4 E 422281.2 N10/09/2019-11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


(0.20) MADE GROUND: Black slightly gravelly sandy clayey SILT with occasional rootlets and rare wood fragments. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone.

211.55 0.20

(0.80) Greyish brown orange mottled slightly sandy gravelly CLAY. Sand is fine to medium.

210.75 1.00

(1.45)

Medium dense to dense greyish brown gravelly very clayey SAND. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to subrounded comprising sandstone.

209.30 2.45Complete at 2.45m

0.00-0.20 D1


0.20-1.00 DB2

1.00-1.50 B3

1.20-1.65 SPT N=17 2,2/3,4,5,5

2.00-2.45 SPT N=50 6,9/9,11,14,16

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 HM



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS106Number

212.86

370261.8 E 422324.1 N10/09/2019-11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


1

(0.30) MADE GROUND: Black slightly gravelly sandy clayey SILT with frequent rootlets, rare wood fragments and brick fragments. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone.

212.56 0.30(0.20)

Brown gravelly sandy CLAY with occasional coal fragments. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone and mudstone.

212.36 0.50(0.30)

Brown gravelly clayey SAND. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular to subangular comprising sandstone and mudstone. Wet strata.

212.06 0.80

(0.40)

Brown sandy very clayey GRAVEL. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular to subrounded comprising sandstone and mudstone. Wet stata.

211.66 1.20(0.20)

Stiff consistency brownish grey slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone.

211.46 1.40

(0.93)

Black sandy GRAVEL of predominantly COAL. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular to subangular.

210.53 2.33

Complete at 2.33m

0.00-0.30 D1

Refusal at 2.33mbgl on possible cobble. Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.

0.50-0.80 DB2

Water strike(1) at 0.80m.0.80-1.21 SPT 52*/105

N=3025,27/10,8,6,6

1.20-1.40 B3

1.40-2.00 B4

1.90-2.33 SPT 50/280 10,12/12,13,14,11

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 HM



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS107Number

210.33

370212.5 E 422310.2 N10/09/2019-11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


(0.30) MADE GROUND: Yellowish brown grey mottled slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with rare coal fragments and brick fragments. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular to rounded comprising sandstone and mudstone.

210.03 0.30(0.20)

Firm to stiff consistency greyish brown slightly gravelly sandy silty CLAY with rare sandstone cobbles. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular comprising sandstone.

209.83 0.50(0.30)

Grey gravelly very clayey SAND. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone.

209.53 0.80

(1.20)Stiff to very stiff consistency gravelly very sandy CLAY with occasional coal fragments. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to subrounded comprising sandstone and mudstone.

208.33 2.00

(0.40)Grey gravelly very clayey SAND. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to medium and subangular comprising sandstone.

207.93 2.40

(0.36)Stiff consistency gravelly very sandy CLAY with occasional coal fragments and rare sandstone cobbles. Sand is fine to medium. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to subrounded comprising sandstone and mudstone.

207.57 2.76

Complete at 2.76m

0.00-0.30 D1


0.30-0.50 D2

1.20-1.65 SPT N=8 2,1/2,2,2,2

2.00-2.45 SPT N=19 3,6/5,4,4,6

2.60-2.76 SPT 25*/10050/60

7,18/50

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy

Figure No.LKC 19 1374.WS108

1:40 HM



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS108Number

208.89

370182.2 E 422383.4 N10/09/2019-11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


(0.30) MADE GROUND: Brown slightly gravelly slightly sandy silty CLAY with frequent rootlets occasional brick and glass fragments. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium and angular to subrounded comprising mudstone.

208.59 0.30

(1.10)

Firm consistency low strength light brown mottled grey slightly gravelly sandy CLAY with occasional rootlets. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

207.49 1.40

(2.04)

Stiff to very stiff consistency greyish brown gravelly very sandy CLAY. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone.

205.45 3.44Complete at 3.44m

0.00-0.30 D1

Handheld GPS used for location and elevation.Sampler refusal at 3.44mbgl on possible sandstone cobble.

0.30-1.00 DB2

1.20-1.65 SPT N=5 1,2/1,2,1,1

1.50-2.00 U3

2.00-2.45 SPT N=18 2,2/3,4,5,6

3.00-3.44 SPT 50/290 4,7/9,13,15,13

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 BR

150mm to 1.00m



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS109Number

212.52

370227.4 E 422392.3 N11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method

Drive-in Windowless Sampler to 4.00mbgl.

1

(0.20) MADE GROUND: Brown slightly gravelly slightly sandy silty CLAY with frequent rootlets occasional brick and glass fragments. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium and angular to subrounded comprising mudstone.

212.32 0.20

(2.00)

Firm consistency low strength light brown mottled grey sandy slightly gravelly CLAY with occasional rootlets. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

Less mottling below 1.80mbgl.

210.32 2.20

(1.80)

Stiff to very stiff consistency greyish brown sandy gravelly CLAY. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse and subangular to subrounded comprising mudstone and shale.

Gravel more frequent with depth.

208.52 4.00Complete at 4.00m

0.00-0.20 D1 PID = 0.3ppm

Borehole stable.No shear vane readings below 2.00mbgl due to high gravel content.

0.20-1.00 D2 PID < 0.1ppm

Elevation and location from handheld GPS.Sampler refusal at 3.80mbgl, SPT continued to 4.00mbgl.Refusal on probable bedrock. Mudstone identified in SPT sample.

0.50-1.00 B3


1.20-1.65 SPT N=6 1,1/1,1,2,21.20-1.65 X4

1.50-2.00 B5

2.00 SV 39kPa2.00-2.45 SPT N=8 1,2/2,3,2,12.00-2.45 X6

2.50-3.00 U7

3.00-3.45 SPT N=0 1,0/0,0,0,0

3.80-4.00 SPT 50/50 10,14/503.80-4.00 X9

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 BR

150mm to 1.00m



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS110Number

212.76

370228.1 E 422337.1 N11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


(0.30) MADE GROUND: Brown silty slightly sandy slightly gravelly CLAY with frequent rootlets occasional brick and glass fragments. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium and angular to subrounded comprising mudstone.

212.46 0.30

(1.90)

Stiff consistency medium strength brown sandy slightly gravelly CLAY with frequent rootlets. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

210.56 2.20

(2.25)

Stiff to very stiff consistency grey gravelly sandy CLAY with occasional coal fragments. Sand is fine to coarse and angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

208.31 4.45Complete at 4.45m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID < 0.1ppm

No shear vane reading below 1.50mbgl due to high gravel content.Elevation and location from handheld GPS.Sampler refusal at 4.00mbgl, SPT continued to 4.45mbgl.

0.30-1.00 D2 PID < 0.1ppm

Refusal on probable bedrock. Mudstone identified in SPT sample.Borehole stable.

0.50-1.00 B3

1.00 SV 59kPa

1.20-1.65 SPT N=21 1,3/4,5,6,61.20-1.65 X4

1.50-2.00 U5

2.00-2.45 SPT N=21 4,4/5,6,5,52.00-2.45 X6

2.50-3.00 U7

3.00-3.45 SPT N=36 6,7/7,10,10,93.00-3.45 X8

3.50-4.00 B9

4.00-4.45 SPT N=50 7,7/8,11,12,194.00-4.45 X10

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 BR

150mm to 1.00m



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS111Number

220.46

370335.9 E 422375.3 N11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


1(0.30) TOPSOIL: blackish brown silty sandy slightly gravelly CLAY with frequent rootlets. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium and angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

220.16 0.30

(2.50)

Firm to stiff consistency medium strength brown mottled grey sandy gravelly CLAY with occasional rootlets and coal fragments. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular to subrounded comprising mudstone and sandstone.

No rootlets identified below 1.60mbgl.

SAND and GRAVEL content greater with depth.

217.66 2.80

(0.45)

Extremely weak extremely weathered SANDSTONE recovered as sandy gravel. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular to subangular.

217.21 3.25Complete at 3.25m

0.00-0.30 D1 PID = 0.4ppm

No shear vane readings below 1.50mbgl due to high gravel content.Elevation and location from handheld GPS.


Sampler refusal at 2.80mbgl, SPT continued to 3.25mbgl.

0.30-1.00 D2 PID < 0.1ppm

Refusal on probable bedrock. Sandstone identified in SPT sample.Borehole stable.

0.50-1.00 B3

1.00 SV 61.5kPa

1.20-1.65 SPT N=17 2,2/3,4,5,51.20-1.65 X4

1.50-2.00 U5

2.00-2.45 SPT N=32 6,7/7,8,8,92.00-2.45 X62.20-2.60 U7

2.80-3.17 SPT 50/220 6,12/12,11,272.80-3.25 X8

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 BR

150mm to 1.00m



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS112Number

225.26

370375.2 E 422440 N11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


(0.20) TOPSOIL: blackish brown silty sandy slightly gravelly CLAY with frequent rootlets. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium and angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.

225.06 0.20

(1.10)

Firm to stiff consistency medium strength brownish orange sandy slightly gravelly CLAY with occasional rootlets. Sand is fine to coarse and micaceous. Gravel is fine to medium and angular to subangular comprising mudstone.

223.96 1.30

(1.15)

Extremely weak extremely weathered MUDSTONE recovered as very clayey gravel. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular.

222.81 2.45Complete at 2.45m

0.00-0.20 D1 PID < 0.1ppm

No shear vane readings below 1.00mbgl due to high gravel content.Elevation and location from handheld GPS.

0.20-1.00 D2 PID < 0.1ppm

Sampler refusal at 2.00mbgl, SPT continued to 2.45mbgl.Refusal on probable bedrock. Mudstone identified in SPT sample.Borehole stable.

1.00 SV 61kPa

1.20-1.65 SPT N=10 2,3/2,2,3,31.20-1.65 X3

1.50-2.00 U4

2.00-2.45 SPT N=50 5,7/11,12,13,142.00-2.45 X5

1/1



Ground Level (mOD)

Dates

Site

Client

Engineer

JobNumber

Sheet

Wat

er


(m)(Thickness)

Depth(m)



LoggedBy


1:40 BR

150mm to 1.00m



LKC

LKC 19 1374

WS113Number

229.51

370419.5 E 422415.9 N11/09/2019


Dimensions

WaterDepth(m)

Field Records

Excavation Method


(0.40)TOPSOIL: blackish brown silty sandy slightly gravelly CLAY with frequent rootlets. Sand is fine to coarse. Gravel is fine to medium and angular to subangular comprising mudstone and sandstone.229.11 0.40

(1.75)

Firm consistency medium strength brown mottled grey sandy slightly gravelly CLAY with occasional rootlets. Sand is fine to coarse and micaceous. Gravel is fine to medium and angular to subangular comprising mudstone.

227.36 2.15

(1.00)

Extremely weathered extremely weak MUDSTONE recovered as clayey gravel. Gravel is fine to coarse and angular to subangular.

226.36 3.15Complete at 3.15m

0.00-0.40 D1 PID <0.1ppm

Elevation and location from handheld GPS.Sampler refusal at 2.70mbgl, SPT continued to 3.15mbgl.Refusal on probable bedrock. Mudstone identified in SPT sample.Borehole stable.

0.40-1.00 D2 PID < 0.1ppm0.50-1.00 B3

1.00 SV 48kPa

1.20-1.65 SPT N=6 1,1/1,1,2,2

1.50-2.00 U4

2.00-2.45 SPT N=27 4,5/6,7,7,7

2.50-2.70 B5

2.70-3.15 SPT N=50 6,8/9,11,13,17

1/1



Appendix C

Certificates of Analysis – Soil

Chemtest Ltd.

Depot Road

Newmarket

CB8 0AL

Tel: 01638 606070

Email: [email protected]

Report No.: 19-32243-1

Initial Date of Issue: 04-Oct-2019

Client LK Consult

Client Address: Unit 29 Eton Business Park Eton Hill Road Radcliffe Manchester Lancashire M26 2ZS

Contact(s): Contaminated Land Peter Dunn

Project LKC 19 1374 Ellison Fold Way, Blackburn

Quotation No.: Date Received: 26-Sep-2019

Order No.: 737229 Date Instructed: 26-Sep-2019

No. of Samples: 14

Turnaround (Wkdays): 5 Results Due: 02-Oct-2019

Date Approved: 04-Oct-2019

Approved By:

Details: Robert Monk, Technical Manager

Final Report

Page 1 of 12

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243Quotation No.: 895301 895303 895305 895306 895307 895308 895309 895310 895311

WS101 WS102 WS102 WS103 WS103 WS104 WS104 WS105 WS105SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.20 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.201.20 0.60 3.50 0.60 1.20 0.30 1.30 0.20 1.00

10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM

Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD

ACM Type U 2192 N/A - - - - - - -

Asbestos Identification U 2192 % 0.001 No Asbestos Detected

No Asbestos Detected






ACM Detection Stage U 2192 N/A - - - - - - -Moisture N 2030 % 0.020 18 21 10 27 18 25 18 20 17Soil Colour N 2040 N/A Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown, Brown, Brown, BrownOther Material N 2040 N/A Stones, Stones, Stones, Stones, Stones, Stones, Stones, Stones Stones,Soil Texture N 2040 N/A Clay Clay Clay , Clay Clay, Sand Clay, Sand SandChromatogram (TPH) N N/A See Attached See AttachedpH M 2010 N/A 6.2 6.4 8.2 6.0 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.8 6.9Boron (Hot Water Soluble) M 2120 mg/kg 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40Magnesium (Water Soluble) N 2120 g/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Sulphate (2:1 Water Soluble) as SO4 M 2120 g/l 0.010 0.023 0.025 0.054 0.016 0.012 0.025 < 0.010 0.045 0.028Chloride (Water Soluble) M 2220 g/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Nitrate (Water Soluble) N 2220 g/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Cyanide (Free) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50 [B] < 0.50 [B] < 0.50Cyanide (Total) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50 [B] < 0.50 [B] < 0.50Arsenic M 2450 mg/kg 1.0 9.0 38 8.2 21 15 19 14Cadmium M 2450 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.50 0.14 0.27 0.24 0.18 0.40Chromium M 2450 mg/kg 1.0 23 20 26 17 20 21 24Copper M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 16 100 17 38 34 38 31Mercury M 2450 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.25 < 0.10 0.19 0.18 0.31 0.14Nickel M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 18 27 27 16 17 18 25Lead M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 23 230 13 110 93 72 52Selenium M 2450 mg/kg 0.20 < 0.20 0.41 0.32 0.57 0.43 0.51 0.42Vanadium U 2450 mg/kg 5.0 27 32 27 23 27 28 26Zinc M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 40 200 53 130 110 61 50Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Organic Matter M 2625 % 0.40 1.6 7.2 1.2 7.9 6.6 4.5 4.7Fuel Type N 2670 N/A PAH N/AAliphatic TPH >C5-C6 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C16-C21 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0

Project: LKC 19 1374 Ellison Fold Way, Blackburn

Top Depth (m):Bottom Depth (m):

Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:

Chemtest Sample ID.:

Client Sample ID.:Sample Type:

Date Sampled ($):

Page 2 of 12

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243Quotation No.: 895301 895303 895305 895306 895307 895308 895309 895310 895311

WS101 WS102 WS102 WS103 WS103 WS104 WS104 WS105 WS105SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.20 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.201.20 0.60 3.50 0.60 1.20 0.30 1.30 0.20 1.00

10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM




Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0 [B] < 5.0 [B] < 5.0Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] 2.2 [B] < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] 30 [B] < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] 30 [B] < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0 [B] 62 [B] < 5.0Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 10.0 [B] 62 [B] < 10Benzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Toluene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 [B] 1.5 [B] 1.8Ethylbenzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0m & p-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0o-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 [B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0Naphthalene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.42 < 0.10 0.35 1.2 0.73 0.18Acenaphthylene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.10 < 0.10 0.35 0.16 0.60 < 0.10Acenaphthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.68 < 0.10 0.57 1.2 0.43 < 0.10Fluorene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.40 < 0.10 0.65 0.95 0.83 < 0.10Phenanthrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.32 4.7 < 0.10 5.3 7.4 8.0 1.2Anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.77 < 0.10 0.99 1.7 1.2 0.19Fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.21 6.1 < 0.10 6.2 7.2 7.0 1.2Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.24 5.3 < 0.10 5.9 6.8 5.7 1.2Benzo[a]anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 2.2 < 0.10 2.4 3.1 2.2 0.41Chrysene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 2.6 < 0.10 3.1 3.6 2.9 0.41Benzo[b]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 2.8 < 0.10 3.5 3.9 2.9 < 0.10Benzo[k]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.97 < 0.10 1.2 1.4 1.1 < 0.10Benzo[a]pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 2.2 < 0.10 2.8 3.1 2.2 0.32Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.94 < 0.10 1.5 1.7 1.2 < 0.10Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 0.10 < 0.10 0.16 0.23 0.13 < 0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 1.2 < 0.10 1.5 1.7 1.2 0.19Total Of 16 PAH's N 2800 mg/kg 2.0 < 2.0 32 < 2.0 37 45 38 5.3Total Phenols M 2920 mg/kg 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30

Page 3 of 12

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:


ACM Type U 2192 N/A

Asbestos Identification U 2192 % 0.001

ACM Detection Stage U 2192 N/AMoisture N 2030 % 0.020Soil Colour N 2040 N/AOther Material N 2040 N/ASoil Texture N 2040 N/AChromatogram (TPH) N N/ApH M 2010 N/ABoron (Hot Water Soluble) M 2120 mg/kg 0.40Magnesium (Water Soluble) N 2120 g/l 0.010Sulphate (2:1 Water Soluble) as SO4 M 2120 g/l 0.010Chloride (Water Soluble) M 2220 g/l 0.010Nitrate (Water Soluble) N 2220 g/l 0.010Cyanide (Free) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50Cyanide (Total) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50Arsenic M 2450 mg/kg 1.0Cadmium M 2450 mg/kg 0.10Chromium M 2450 mg/kg 1.0Copper M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Mercury M 2450 mg/kg 0.10Nickel M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Lead M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Selenium M 2450 mg/kg 0.20Vanadium U 2450 mg/kg 5.0Zinc M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50Organic Matter M 2625 % 0.40Fuel Type N 2670 N/AAliphatic TPH >C5-C6 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C16-C21 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0



Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243895312 895313 895314 895315 895316WS106 WS106 WS107 WS107 WS108SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.000.30 0.80 0.30 0.80 0.30

10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM

- - - -No Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

Detected- - - -

9.9 9.1 19 13 17Brown Brown Brown, Brown Brown

Stones, Stones, Stones, Stones, Stones,Clay Clay Clay, Clay Sand,

See Attached See Attached5.8 6.2 6.4 6.0 6.1

< 0.40 < 0.40< 0.010

< 0.010 < 0.010 0.021 < 0.010 0.012< 0.010< 0.010

[B] < 0.50 [B] < 0.50[B] < 0.50 [B] < 0.50

7.0 11 8.9 11< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.16

22 27 30 2317 18 17 21

< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.1621 21 30 1313 35 15 61

< 0.20 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.2023 27 31 2837 50 53 81

< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.500.98 2.6 0.93 3.5n/a PAH

[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] 47[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0

Page 4 of 12

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:




Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 10.0Benzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0Toluene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0Ethylbenzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0m & p-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0o-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether M 2760 µg/kg 1.0Naphthalene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Acenaphthylene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10Acenaphthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Fluorene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Phenanthrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[a]anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Chrysene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[b]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[k]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[a]pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Total Of 16 PAH's N 2800 mg/kg 2.0Total Phenols M 2920 mg/kg 0.30

19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243 19-32243895312 895313 895314 895315 895316WS106 WS106 WS107 WS107 WS108SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.000.30 0.80 0.30 0.80 0.30

10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM DURHAM

[B] < 5.0 [B] 47[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] 2.7[B] < 1.0 [B] 67[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 5.0 [B] 70[B] < 10 [B] 120[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] 1.7 [B] < 1.0

[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0[B] < 1.0 [B] < 1.0< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 1.1 0.19 0.95< 0.10 0.12 < 0.10 0.15< 0.10 1.3 0.13 1.0< 0.10 1.2 0.14 0.80< 0.10 0.26 < 0.10 0.23< 0.10 0.37 < 0.10 0.22< 0.10 0.31 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 0.21 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 0.13 < 0.10 < 0.10< 2.0 5.1 < 2.0 3.4< 0.30 < 0.30

Page 5 of 12

TPH Chromatogram on Soil Sample: 895306

Page 6 of 12


Page 7 of 12


Page 8 of 12


Page 9 of 12

Deviations

Sample: Sample Ref: Sample ID:Sample

Location:

Sampled

Date:Deviation Code(s):

Containers

Received:

895306 WS103 10-Sep-2019 B Amber Glass 250ml


895306 WS103 10-Sep-2019 B Plastic Tub 500g










In accordance with UKAS Policy on Deviating Samples TPS 63. Chemtest have a procedure to ensure 'upon receipt of each sample a competent laboratory shall assess whether the sample is suitable with regard to the requested test(s)'. This policy and the respective holding times applied, can be supplied upon request.The reason a sample is declared as deviating is detailed below. Where applicable the analysis remains UKAS/MCERTs accredited but the results may be compromised.

Page 10 of 12

Test Methods

SOP Title Parameters included Method summary

2010 pH Value of Soils pH pH Meter

2030Moisture and Stone Content of Soils(Requirement of MCERTS)

Moisture contentDetermination of moisture content of soil as a percentage of its as received mass obtained at <37°C.

2040 Soil Description(Requirement of MCERTS) Soil description As received soil is described based upon

BS5930

2120 Water Soluble Boron, Sulphate, Magnesium & Chromium Boron; Sulphate; Magnesium; Chromium Aqueous extraction / ICP-OES

2192 Asbestos Asbestos Polarised light microscopy / Gravimetry

2220 Water soluble Chloride in Soils ChlorideAqueous extraction and measuremernt by ‘Aquakem 600’ Discrete Analyser using ferric nitrate / mercuric thiocyanate.

2300 Cyanides & Thiocyanate in Soils

Free (or easy liberatable) Cyanide; total Cyanide; complex Cyanide; Thiocyanate

Allkaline extraction followed by colorimetric determination using Automated Flow Injection Analyser.

2450 Acid Soluble Metals in Soils

Metals, including: Arsenic; Barium; Beryllium; Cadmium; Chromium; Cobalt; Copper; Lead; Manganese; Mercury; Molybdenum; Nickel; Selenium; Vanadium; Zinc

Acid digestion followed by determination of metals in extract by ICP-MS.

2490 Hexavalent Chromium in Soils Chromium [VI]

Soil extracts are prepared by extracting dried and ground soil samples into boiling water. Chromium [VI] is determined by ‘Aquakem 600’ Discrete Analyser using 1,5-diphenylcarbazide.

2625 Total Organic Carbon in Soils Total organic Carbon (TOC)Determined by high temperature combustion under oxygen, using an Eltra elemental analyser.

2670 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) in Soils by GC-FID

TPH (C6–C40); optional carbon banding, e.g. 3-band – GRO, DRO & LRO*TPH C8–C40 Dichloromethane extraction / GC-FID

2680 TPH A/A Split

Aliphatics: >C5–C6, >C6–C8,>C8–C10, >C10–C12, >C12–C16, >C16–C21, >C21– C35, >C35– C44Aromatics: >C5–C7, >C7–C8, >C8– C10, >C10–C12, >C12–C16, >C16– C21, >C21– C35, >C35– C44

Dichloromethane extraction / GCxGC FID detection

2760Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soils by Headspace GC-MS

Volatile organic compounds, including BTEX and halogenated Aliphatic/Aromatics.(cf. USEPA Method 8260)*please refer to UKAS schedule

Automated headspace gas chromatographic (GC) analysis of a soil sample, as received, with mass spectrometric (MS) detection of volatile organic compounds.

2800Speciated Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) in Soil by GC-MS

Acenaphthene*; Acenaphthylene; Anthracene*; Benzo[a]Anthracene*; Benzo[a]Pyrene*; Benzo[b]Fluoranthene*; Benzo[ghi]Perylene*; Benzo[k]Fluoranthene; Chrysene*; Dibenz[ah]Anthracene; Fluoranthene*; Fluorene*; Indeno[123cd]Pyrene*; Naphthalene*; Phenanthrene*; Pyrene*

Dichloromethane extraction / GC-MS

2920 Phenols in Soils by HPLC

Phenolic compounds including Resorcinol, Phenol, Methylphenols, Dimethylphenols, 1-Naphthol and TrimethylphenolsNote: chlorophenols are excluded.

60:40 methanol/water mixture extraction, followed by HPLC determination using electrochemical detection.

Page 11 of 12

Report Information

Key

U UKAS accreditedM MCERTS and UKAS accreditedN UnaccreditedS This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis

SN This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is not accredited for this analysisT This analysis has been subcontracted to an unaccredited laboratory

I/S Insufficient SampleU/S Unsuitable SampleN/E not evaluated

< "less than"> "greater than"$ This information has been supplied by the client and can affect the integrity of test data.

Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditationThe results relate only to the items testedUncertainty of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request None of the results in this report have been recovery correctedAll results are expressed on a dry weight basisThe following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, PhenolsFor all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysisAll Asbestos testing is performed at the indicated laboratory Issue numbers are sequential starting with 1 all subsequent reports are incremented by 1

Sample Deviation Codes

A - Date of sampling not suppliedB - Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction)C - Sample not received in appropriate containersD - Broken ContainerE - Insufficient Sample (Applies to LOI in Trommel Fines Only)

Sample Retention and Disposal

All soil samples will be retained for a period of 45 days from the date of receiptAll water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receiptCharges may apply to extended sample storage

If you require extended retention of samples, please email your requirements to: [email protected]

Page 12 of 12

mailto:[email protected]

Chemtest Ltd.

Depot Road

Newmarket

CB8 0AL

Tel: 01638 606070


Report No.: 19-30908-1

Initial Date of Issue: 19-Sep-2019

Client LK Consult






No. of Samples: 10

Turnaround (Wkdays): 5 Results Due: 19-Sep-2019

Date Approved: 19-Sep-2019

Approved By:

Details: Robert Monk, Technical Manager

Final Report

Page 1 of 11

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult 19-30908 19-30908 19-30908 19-30908 19-30908 19-30908 19-30908 19-30908Quotation No.: 888536 888537 888538 888539 888540 888541 888542 888543

WS109 d1 WS109 d2 WS110 d1 WS110 d2 WS111 d1 WS111 d2 WS112 d1 WS112 d2SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.20.2 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.2 1.0

11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY


ACM Type U 2192 N/A - - - - - - -








ACM Detection Stage U 2192 N/A - - - - - - -Moisture N 2030 % 0.020 31 23 27 13 33 9.4 28 29

Soil Colour N 2040 N/A Brown, Brown, Brown Brown Brown Brown Brow Brown Brown

Other Material N 2040 N/A Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones StonesSoil Texture N 2040 N/A Clay Clay Clay Clay Sand Clay Sand ClayChromatogram (TPH) N N/A See Attached See Attached See Attached See AttachedpH M 2010 N/A 7.2 7.5 6.2 5.8 5.7 6.4 6.5 6.5Boron (Hot Water Soluble) M 2120 mg/kg 0.40 < 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.44Magnesium (Water Soluble) N 2120 g/l 0.010 < 0.010Sulphate (2:1 Water Soluble) as SO4 M 2120 g/l 0.010 0.038 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Chloride (Water Soluble) M 2220 g/l 0.010 < 0.010Nitrate (Water Soluble) N 2220 g/l 0.010 < 0.010Cyanide (Free) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Cyanide (Total) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Arsenic M 2450 mg/kg 1.0 24 4.1 5.1 16 1.8 24 17Cadmium M 2450 mg/kg 0.10 0.56 < 0.10 0.17 0.17 < 0.10 0.27 0.15Chromium M 2450 mg/kg 1.0 30 27 26 29 36 33 32Copper M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 64 7.7 9.5 24 15 50 63Mercury M 2450 mg/kg 0.10 0.19 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.15 < 0.10 0.18 < 0.10Nickel M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 34 17 13 17 33 29 31Lead M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 430 14 29 74 11 130 30Selenium M 2450 mg/kg 0.20 0.83 < 0.20 0.71 0.82 < 0.20 1.5 1.1Vanadium U 2450 mg/kg 5.0 34 24 28 36 28 43 28Zinc M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 270 40 34 52 59 100 71Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Organic Matter M 2625 % 0.40 13 0.64 3.6 6.2 1.2 8.8 2.2Fuel Type N 2670 N/A n/a PAH PAH n/aAliphatic TPH >C5-C6 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C16-C21 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 120 < 1.0 < 1.0



Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

Page 2 of 11

Results - Soil


WS109 d1 WS109 d2 WS110 d1 WS110 d2 WS111 d1 WS111 d2 WS112 d1 WS112 d2SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.20.2 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.2 1.0

11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY




Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0 < 5.0 120 < 5.0 < 5.0Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 72 140 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0 < 5.0 72 140 < 5.0Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 10.0 < 10 190 140 < 10Benzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Toluene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Ethylbenzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0m & p-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0o-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Naphthalene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Acenaphthylene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Acenaphthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Fluorene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Phenanthrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.75 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.38 < 0.10 1.0 < 0.10Anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.19 < 0.10Fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 1.1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.73 < 0.10 1.5 < 0.10Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 1.0 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.65 < 0.10 1.4 < 0.10Benzo[a]anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.24 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Chrysene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.27 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Benzo[b]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Benzo[k]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Benzo[a]pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Total Of 16 PAH's N 2800 mg/kg 2.0 3.4 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 4.1 < 2.0Total Phenols M 2920 mg/kg 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30

Page 3 of 11

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:


ACM Type U 2192 N/A


ACM Detection Stage U 2192 N/AMoisture N 2030 % 0.020

Soil Colour N 2040 N/A

Other Material N 2040 N/ASoil Texture N 2040 N/AChromatogram (TPH) N N/ApH M 2010 N/ABoron (Hot Water Soluble) M 2120 mg/kg 0.40Magnesium (Water Soluble) N 2120 g/l 0.010Sulphate (2:1 Water Soluble) as SO4 M 2120 g/l 0.010Chloride (Water Soluble) M 2220 g/l 0.010Nitrate (Water Soluble) N 2220 g/l 0.010Cyanide (Free) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50Cyanide (Total) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50Arsenic M 2450 mg/kg 1.0Cadmium M 2450 mg/kg 0.10Chromium M 2450 mg/kg 1.0Copper M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Mercury M 2450 mg/kg 0.10Nickel M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Lead M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Selenium M 2450 mg/kg 0.20Vanadium U 2450 mg/kg 5.0Zinc M 2450 mg/kg 0.50Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50Organic Matter M 2625 % 0.40Fuel Type N 2670 N/AAliphatic TPH >C5-C6 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C16-C21 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0



Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

19-30908 19-30908888544 888545

WS113 d1 WS113 d2SOIL SOIL0.0 0.40.4 1.0

11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY

- -No Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

Detected- -

29 25

Brown Brown

Stones StonesSand Clay

5.9 7.0

0.015 < 0.010

22 3.30.50 0.2040 5237 24

0.22 < 0.1027 47

120 270.89 < 0.2050 4184 76

< 0.50 < 0.508.6 2.2

Page 4 of 11

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:




Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 10.0Benzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0Toluene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0Ethylbenzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0m & p-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0o-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether M 2760 µg/kg 1.0Naphthalene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Acenaphthylene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10Acenaphthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Fluorene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Phenanthrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[a]anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Chrysene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[b]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[k]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[a]pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10Total Of 16 PAH's N 2800 mg/kg 2.0Total Phenols M 2920 mg/kg 0.30

19-30908 19-30908888544 888545

WS113 d1 WS113 d2SOIL SOIL0.0 0.40.4 1.0

11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY

< 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.100.39 < 0.10

< 0.10 < 0.100.58 < 0.100.57 < 0.100.19 < 0.100.19 < 0.10

< 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10< 2.0 < 2.0

Page 5 of 11


Page 6 of 11


Page 7 of 11


Page 8 of 11


Page 9 of 11

Test Methods






BS5930















2680 TPH A/A Split












Page 10 of 11

Report Information

Key











Page 11 of 11


Chemtest Ltd.

Depot Road

Newmarket

CB8 0AL

Tel: 01638 606070


Report No.: 19-30956-1

Initial Date of Issue: 19-Sep-2019

Client LK Consult






No. of Samples: 31

Turnaround (Wkdays): 5 Results Due: 19-Sep-2019

Date Approved: 19-Sep-2019

Approved By:

Details: Amy Parekh-Pross, Technical Projects Manager

Final Report

Page 1 of 19

Results - Soil


TP101 TP102 TP102 TP103 TP103 TP104 TP104 TP105SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.00.3 0.5 1.5 0.3 1.3 0.2 1.2 0.2

10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY


ACM Type U 2192 N/A - - - - - -







ACM Detection Stage U 2192 N/A - - - - - -Moisture N 2030 % 0.020 26 28 14 30 18 23 10 36Soil Colour N 2040 N/A Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown BrownOther Material N 2040 N/A Stones Stones, Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones StonesSoil Texture N 2040 N/A Sand Loam Clay Loam Loam Sand Sand SandChromatogram (TPH) N N/A See Attached See Attached See AttachedpH M 2010 N/A 6.3 6.3 6.0 5.9 6.4 6.0 7.0 5.1Boron (Hot Water Soluble) M 2120 mg/kg 0.40 0.43 0.55 < 0.40Magnesium (Water Soluble) N 2120 g/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Sulphate (2:1 Water Soluble) as SO4 M 2120 g/l 0.010 0.049 0.020 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.033 < 0.010 0.028Chloride (Water Soluble) M 2220 g/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Nitrate (Water Soluble) N 2220 g/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Cyanide (Free) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Cyanide (Total) M 2300 mg/kg 0.50 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Arsenic M 2450 mg/kg 1.0 12 17 17 9.4 4.2 14Cadmium M 2450 mg/kg 0.10 0.33 0.23 0.49 0.32 0.20 0.12Chromium M 2450 mg/kg 1.0 16 22 19 23 18 16Copper M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 36 60 47 30 14 29Mercury M 2450 mg/kg 0.10 0.18 0.22 0.24 0.13 < 0.10 0.34Nickel M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 15 27 20 22 26 9.9Lead M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 120 180 140 78 9.9 94Selenium M 2450 mg/kg 0.20 0.55 0.86 0.99 0.45 0.20 1.2Vanadium U 2450 mg/kg 5.0 22 25 24 23 14 23Zinc M 2450 mg/kg 0.50 100 160 180 93 36 33Chromium (Hexavalent) N 2490 mg/kg 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Organic Matter M 2625 % 0.40 7.1 6.7 7.4 0.90 0.66 12Fuel Type N 2670 N/A PAH PAH N/AAliphatic TPH >C5-C6 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C16-C21 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 65 < 1.0 < 1.0Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0



Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

Page 2 of 19

Results - Soil


TP101 TP102 TP102 TP103 TP103 TP104 TP104 TP105SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.00.3 0.5 1.5 0.3 1.3 0.2 1.2 0.2

10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY




Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0 65 < 5.0 < 5.0Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 U 2680 mg/kg 1.0 23 31 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 M 2680 mg/kg 1.0 96 2.5 < 1.0Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 N 2680 mg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 5.0 120 33 < 5.0Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons N 2680 mg/kg 10.0 180 33 < 10Benzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Toluene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Ethylbenzene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0m & p-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0o-Xylene M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether M 2760 µg/kg 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Naphthalene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.26 0.21 0.19 0.15 < 0.10 < 0.10Acenaphthylene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.18 0.27 0.16 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Acenaphthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.92 0.30 0.22 0.12 < 0.10 < 0.10Fluorene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.70 0.32 0.25 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Phenanthrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 6.5 3.6 2.3 1.1 < 0.10 0.72Anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 1.3 1.3 0.51 0.24 < 0.10 0.15Fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 8.3 8.1 4.4 1.9 < 0.10 1.6Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 7.0 6.8 3.8 1.7 < 0.10 1.4Benzo[a]anthracene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 3.2 3.3 2.0 0.76 < 0.10 0.72Chrysene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 3.5 3.5 2.1 0.77 < 0.10 0.77Benzo[b]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 4.1 4.2 2.8 1.1 < 0.10 1.1Benzo[k]fluoranthene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 1.4 1.4 0.94 0.36 < 0.10 0.36Benzo[a]pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 3.3 3.5 2.1 0.82 < 0.10 0.87Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 1.9 2.1 1.4 0.54 < 0.10 0.63Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 2800 mg/kg 0.10 0.39 0.39 0.21 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene M 2800 mg/kg 0.10 1.8 1.9 1.2 0.52 < 0.10 0.55Total Of 16 PAH's N 2800 mg/kg 2.0 45 41 25 10 < 2.0 8.9Total Phenols M 2920 mg/kg 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30

Page 3 of 19

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:


ACM Type U 2192 N/A





Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956888792 888793 888794 888796 888797 888798 888799 888800 888802TP105 TP106 TP106 TP107 TP107 TP108 TP108 TP109 TP110SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.01.2 0.3 1.1 0.3 1.3 0.2 1.2 0.3 0.3

10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY

- - - - - -No Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

Detected- - - - - -

19 28 13 31 18 32 15 36 28Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown BrownStones Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones

Clay Loam Clay Sand Clay Sand Sand Loam SandSee Attached

6.2 7.3 6.3 7.5 6.7 5.6 5.6 5.4 5.70.49

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.0100.032 0.032 0.021 0.027 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.020 0.043 < 0.010

< 0.010 38 0.059< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010

< 0.50< 0.50

16 3.5 17 36 8.7 9.40.20 0.37 0.43 0.45 0.39 0.2819 20 21 33 21 1934 20 38 55 35 20

0.21 < 0.10 0.25 0.37 0.25 0.1416 34 18 23 13 1174 11 79 160 96 85

0.59 0.47 0.69 1.5 0.91 0.5223 15 26 48 26 2346 59 60 76 79 110

< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.507.4 1.3 7.1 12 15 5.5

N/A< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0

Page 4 of 19

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:




Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):


19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956888792 888793 888794 888796 888797 888798 888799 888800 888802TP105 TP106 TP106 TP107 TP107 TP108 TP108 TP109 TP110SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.01.2 0.3 1.1 0.3 1.3 0.2 1.2 0.3 0.3

10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 10-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY

< 5.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 5.0< 10< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0

< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 1.2 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 3.6 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 2.6 < 0.10 < 0.100.34 < 0.10 0.69 21 0.56 0.35

< 0.10 < 0.10 0.11 4.4 0.12 < 0.100.59 < 0.10 0.84 22 1.1 0.640.51 < 0.10 0.73 19 0.94 0.590.27 < 0.10 0.35 8.2 0.46 0.210.26 < 0.10 0.35 7.9 0.45 0.280.41 < 0.10 0.58 9.4 0.66 0.330.10 < 0.10 0.19 3.4 0.24 0.110.28 < 0.10 0.44 8.5 0.51 0.270.22 < 0.10 0.27 5.0 0.31 0.20

< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.89 < 0.10 < 0.100.20 < 0.10 0.28 4.3 0.30 0.173.2 < 2.0 4.8 120 5.6 3.2

< 0.30

Page 5 of 19

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:


ACM Type U 2192 N/A





Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956888803 888804 888805 888806 888808 888809 888810 888811TP110 TP111 TP111 TP112 TP113 TP113 TP114 TP114SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.41.3 0.3 1.3 0.3 0.3 1.3 0.4 1.4

11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY

- - - - -No Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

Detected- - - - -

23 36 23 29 32 22 23 19Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown BrownStones Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones Stones

Clay Sand Clay Sand Sand Clay Sand ClaySee Attached See Attached See Attached

6.4 5.8 6.4 5.8 6.3 6.1 5.5 6.40.40 0.65 < 0.40

< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010< 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010

< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.500.60 < 0.50 < 0.50

20 14 9.8 16 3.30.43 0.29 0.32 0.22 < 0.1024 20 21 32 3929 23 21 29 18

0.28 0.15 0.12 0.13 < 0.1014 14 14 21 33

100 78 88 73 111.0 0.82 0.55 0.52 < 0.2036 29 21 47 3259 48 70 59 51

< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.509.0 6.9 7.4 6.6 1.3

PAH N/A N/A< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

13 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Page 6 of 19

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:




Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):


19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956888803 888804 888805 888806 888808 888809 888810 888811TP110 TP111 TP111 TP112 TP113 TP113 TP114 TP114SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.41.3 0.3 1.3 0.3 0.3 1.3 0.4 1.4

11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY

13 < 5.0 < 5.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.03.6 < 1.0 < 1.071 < 1.0 < 1.0

< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.074 < 5.0 < 5.088 < 10 < 10

< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

< 0.10 < 0.10 0.19 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 0.89 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 0.50 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 0.98 < 0.10 < 0.100.53 0.42 10 0.30 < 0.100.12 < 0.10 3.4 < 0.10 < 0.100.96 0.67 15 0.32 < 0.100.85 0.54 12 0.31 < 0.100.44 0.28 6.3 0.14 < 0.100.41 0.28 5.6 0.17 < 0.100.51 0.39 6.7 0.20 < 0.100.17 0.11 2.3 < 0.10 < 0.100.47 0.27 5.6 0.15 < 0.100.33 0.20 3.3 < 0.10 < 0.10

< 0.10 < 0.10 0.61 < 0.10 < 0.100.28 0.17 2.7 < 0.10 < 0.105.1 3.3 76 < 2.0 < 2.0

< 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30

Page 7 of 19

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:


ACM Type U 2192 N/A





Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):

19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956888812 888813 888814 888815 888816 888817TP115 TP115 TP116 TP116 TP117 TP117SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.20.2 1.0 0.2 1.2 0.2 1.2

11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY

- - - - -No Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

DetectedNo Asbestos

Detected- - - - -

26 20 27 11 16 26Brown Brown Brown Brown Brown BrownStones Stones Stones Stones Stones StonesSand Clay Loam Sand Sand Clay

See Attached5.6 6.1 6.2 6.9 5.8 5.4

< 0.40< 0.010

0.016 0.017 < 0.010 0.014 0.067 0.031< 0.010< 0.010

< 0.50< 0.50

21 5.8 17 15 3.40.27 0.26 1.1 0.14 0.2128 40 26 27 4036 65 82 34 27

0.20 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.16 < 0.1020 45 44 23 4770 29 30 51 44

0.68 1.2 1.7 1.1 < 0.2050 35 22 40 3558 63 73 46 69

< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.509.3 4.7 4.0 8.3 1.9

N/A< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0

Page 8 of 19

Results - Soil

Client: LK Consult

Quotation No.:




Asbestos Lab:

Chemtest Job No.:



Date Sampled ($):


19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956 19-30956888812 888813 888814 888815 888816 888817TP115 TP115 TP116 TP116 TP117 TP117SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.20.2 1.0 0.2 1.2 0.2 1.2

11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019 11-Sep-2019COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY COVENTRY

< 5.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 5.0< 10< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0

< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.100.47 < 0.10 0.58 < 0.10 < 0.10

< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.100.45 < 0.10 0.17 < 0.10 < 0.100.41 < 0.10 0.21 < 0.10 < 0.100.19 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.100.21 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.100.28 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10

< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.100.19 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.100.11 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10

< 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.100.13 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.102.4 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0

< 0.30

Page 9 of 19


Page 10 of 19


Page 11 of 19


Page 12 of 19


Page 13 of 19


Page 14 of 19


Page 15 of 19


Page 16 of 19


Page 17 of 19

Test Methods






BS5930















2680 TPH A/A Split












Page 18 of 19

Report Information

Key











Page 19 of 19




Appendix D

Certificates of Analysis – Water

Chemtest Ltd.Depot RoadNewmarket

CB8 0ALTel: 01638 606070


Report No.: 19-33384-2

Initial Date of Issue: 10-Oct-2019

Client LK Consult



Project LKC 19 1374 Ellison Fold Way

Quotation No.: Date Received: 04-Oct-2019

Order No.: 737280 Date Instructed: 04-Oct-2019

No. of Samples: 7

Turnaround (Wkdays): 5 Results Due: 10-Oct-2019

Date Approved: 10-Oct-2019

Approved By:

Details: Ken Scally, Technical Director

Amended Report

Page 1 of 5

Results - Water

Client: LK Consult 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384Quotation No.: 900703 900704 900705 900706 900707 900708 900709

WS101 WS103 WS106 WS108 WS110 WS112 WS113WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER

03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019Determinand Accred. SOP Units LODpH U 1010 N/A 6.5 6.6 6.2 9.3 7.8 7.9 7.5Sulphate U 1220 mg/l 1.0 29 6.3 20 7.1 60 39 14Cyanide (Total) U 1300 mg/l 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050Cyanide (Free) U 1300 mg/l 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050 < 0.050Calcium U 1415 mg/l 5.0 < 5.0 35 48 21 22 39 14Total Hardness as CaCO3 U 1270 mg/l 15 16 99 150 59 77 130 41Arsenic (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 1.0 < 1.0 1.7 3.2 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Boron (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 20 30 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 20 < 20Cadmium (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 0.080 < 0.080 < 0.080 1.3 < 0.080 0.081 < 0.080 < 0.080Chromium (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 1.0 15000 480 26 3.1 3.3 2.1 1.0Copper (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 1.0 54 15 7.4 3.4 2.4 3.2 3.9Nickel (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 1.0 19 11 32 1.4 7.5 2.6 2.7Lead (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 1.0 1.1 < 1.0 1.3 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Selenium (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 1.0 1.4 1.5 2.1 < 1.0 2.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Vanadium (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 1.0 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Zinc (Dissolved) U 1450 µg/l 1.0 190 31 1500 23 160 5.0 8.2Mercury Low Level U 1460 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Chromium (Hexavalent) U 1490 µg/l 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20Dissolved Organic Carbon U 1610 mg/l 2.0 50 27 30 150 10 4.8 4.7Fuel Type N 1670 N/A n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aAliphatic TPH >C5-C6 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aliphatic TPH >C6-C8 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aliphatic TPH >C8-C10 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aliphatic TPH >C10-C12 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aliphatic TPH >C12-C16 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aliphatic TPH >C16-C21 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aliphatic TPH >C21-C35 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aliphatic TPH >C35-C44 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Total Aliphatic Hydrocarbons N 1675 µg/l 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0Aromatic TPH >C5-C7 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aromatic TPH >C7-C8 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aromatic TPH >C8-C10 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aromatic TPH >C10-C12 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aromatic TPH >C12-C16 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aromatic TPH >C16-C21 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aromatic TPH >C21-C35 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Aromatic TPH >C35-C44 N 1675 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Total Aromatic Hydrocarbons N 1675 µg/l 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons N 1675 µg/l 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10Benzene U 1760 µg/l 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Toluene U 1760 µg/l 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0

Project: LKC 19 1374 Ellison Fold WayChemtest Job No.:


Sample Type:Date Sampled ($):

Client Sample ID.:

Page 2 of 5

Results - Water

Client: LK Consult 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384 19-33384Quotation No.: 900703 900704 900705 900706 900707 900708 900709

WS101 WS103 WS106 WS108 WS110 WS112 WS113WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER

03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019 03-Oct-2019Determinand Accred. SOP Units LOD

Project: LKC 19 1374 Ellison Fold WayChemtest Job No.:


Sample Type:Date Sampled ($):

Client Sample ID.:

Ethylbenzene U 1760 µg/l 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0m & p-Xylene U 1760 µg/l 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0o-Xylene U 1760 µg/l 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether N 1760 µg/l 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Naphthalene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Acenaphthylene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Acenaphthene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Fluorene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Phenanthrene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Anthracene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Fluoranthene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Pyrene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Benzo[a]anthracene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Chrysene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Benzo[b]fluoranthene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Benzo[k]fluoranthene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Benzo[a]pyrene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Benzo[g,h,i]perylene N 1800 µg/l 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Total Of 6 PAH's N 1800 µg/l 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Total Phenols U 1920 mg/l 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030

Page 3 of 5

Test Methods

SOP Title Parameters included Method summary1010 pH Value of Waters pH pH Meter

1220 Anions, Alkalinity & Ammonium in Waters

Fluoride; Chloride; Nitrite; Nitrate; Total; Oxidisable Nitrogen (TON); Sulfate; Phosphate; Alkalinity; Ammonium

Automated colorimetric analysis using ‘Aquakem 600’ Discrete Analyser.

1270 Total Hardness of Waters Total hardnessCalculation applied to calcium and magnesium results, expressed as mg l-1 CaCO3 equivalent.

1300 Cyanides & Thiocyanate in Waters

Free (or easy liberatable) Cyanide; total Cyanide; complex Cyanide; Thiocyanate Continuous Flow Analysis.

1415 Cations in Waters by ICP-MS Sodium; Potassium; Calcium; Magnesium Direct determination by inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

1450 Metals in Waters by ICP-MS

Metals, including: Antimony; Arsenic; Barium; Beryllium; Boron; Cadmium; Chromium; Cobalt; Copper; Lead; Manganese; Mercury; Molybdenum; Nickel; Selenium; Tin; Vanadium; Zinc

Filtration of samples followed by direct determination by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

1460 Mercury low-level in Waters by AFS Mercury Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry, with

collimated UV source, wavelength 253.7 nm.

1490 Hexavalent Chromium in Waters Chromium [VI]

Automated colorimetric analysis by ‘Aquakem 600’ Discrete Analyser using 1,5-diphenylcarbazide.

1610 Total/Dissolved Organic Carbon in Waters Organic Carbon TOC Analyser using Catalytic Oxidation

1670 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) in Waters by GC-FID

TPH (C6–C40); optional carbon banding, e.g. 3-band – GRO, DRO & LRO Pentane extraction / GC FID detection

1675TPH Aliphatic/Aromatic split in Waters by GC-FID(cf. Texas Method 1006 / TPH CWG)

Aliphatics: >C5–C6, >C6–C8, >C8– C10, >C10–C12, >C12–C16, >C16–C21, >C21– C35, >C35– C44Aromatics: >C5–C7, >C7–C8, >C8– C10, >C10–C12, >C12–C16, >C16– C21, >C21– C35, >C35– C44

Pentane extraction / GCxGC FID detection

1760Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Waters by Headspace GC-MS

Volatile organic compounds, including BTEX and halogenated Aliphatic/Aromatics. (cf. USEPA Method 8260)

Automated headspace gas chromatographic (GC) analysis of water samples with mass spectrometric (MS) detection of volatile organic compounds.

1800Speciated Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) in Waters by GC-MS

Acenaphthene; Acenaphthylene; Anthracene; Benzo[a]Anthracene; Benzo[a]Pyrene; Benzo[b]Fluoranthene; Benzo[ghi]Perylene; Benzo[k]Fluoranthene; Chrysene; Dibenz[ah]Anthracene; Fluoranthene; Fluorene; Indeno[123cd]Pyrene; Naphthalene; Phenanthrene; Pyrene

Pentane extraction / GCMS detection

1920 Phenols in Waters by HPLCPhenolic compounds including: Phenol, Cresols, Xylenols, Trimethylphenols Note: Chlorophenols are excluded.

Determination by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) using electrochemical detection.

Page 4 of 5

Report Information

KeyU UKAS accreditedM MCERTS and UKAS accreditedN UnaccreditedS This analysis has been subcontracted to a UKAS accredited laboratory that is accredited for this analysis





Sample Deviation CodesA - Date of sampling not suppliedB - Sample age exceeds stability time (sampling to extraction)C - Sample not received in appropriate containersD - Broken ContainerE - Insufficient Sample (Applies to LOI in Trommel Fines Only)

Sample Retention and DisposalAll soil samples will be retained for a period of 45 days from the date of receiptAll water samples will be retained for 14 days from the date of receiptCharges may apply to extended sample storage


Page 5 of 5




Appendix E

Gas Monitoring Results

LK CONSULT LTDGAS MONITORING RECORD

1 of 6

Borehole ID Date/Time CH4 (% v/v)

CO2 (% v/v)

O2 (% v/v)

Peak CH4 (% v/v)

Peak CO2 (%v/v)

% of Lower Explosive

Limit*2

CO Pod (ppm)

H2S Pod (ppm)

Balance (%)

Barometric Pressure (mb)

Internal Flow *3 (ltr/hr)

Standing Water Level (mbgl)

Installation Base Dip (mbgl)

WS101 03/10/2019 09:00 3.4 23.6 0.1 3.5 23.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.9 994 0.1 3.63 4.93

WS102 03/10/2019 09:12 2.0 7.1 0.1 2.0 8.7 0.0 3.0 0.0 90.8 994 0.0 4.41 4.91WS103 03/10/2019 08:31 0.0 10.9 1.8 0.1 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 87.3 993 0.0 2.90 4.90

WS104 03/10/2019 08:50 0.8 10.6 0.3 0.8 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.3 994 1.3 4.44 5.11

WS105 03/10/2019 12:30 0.9 12.1 0.5 1.0 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.6 991 0.8 1.93 1.99

WS106 03/10/2019 12:03 0.0 3.1 2.3 0.2 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.4 991 1.8 0.99 1.77

WS107 03/10/2019 12:41 12.9 13.7 0.1 13.0 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.3 991 1.2 2.55 2.64

WS108 03/10/2019 09:45 0.0 3.7 10.2 0.1 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.8 993 10.5 0.64 3.02

WS109 03/10/2019 10:27 0.0 6.2 2.2 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 91.6 992 0.1 3.21 3.82

WS110 03/10/2019 10:10 0.0 6.4 13.9 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.6 993 -1.4 1.18 3.95

WS111 03/10/2019 10:44 0.0 9.6 10.6 0.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.8 992 -3.0 2.73 2.78WS112 03/10/2019 10:59 0.0 2.5 0.2 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 97.3 991 1.4 1.66 2.05

WS113 03/10/2019 11:12 0.0 3.0 18.2 0.0 3.0 0.0 48.0 0.0 78.8 990 9.4 0.29 2.53

ABBREVIATIONS NOTES*1 Refer to Note 1 ppm Parts per million 1. Equipment is serviced and checked as recommended by the manufacturer. Refer to calibration records.

ND Not detected mb Millibars and service certificates.NR Not recorded ltr/hr Litres per hour 2. CH4 is explosive between the range of 5 - 15% v/v. 100% lower explosive limit is equal to 5% v/v CH4.UR Unable to record mbgl Metres below ground level 3. Flow readings are based on a 1 minute average value where flow is detected (equipment range of +/- 12 ltr/hr)OS Off recordable scale LEL Lower explosive limit in air 4. After CIRIA C665. GSV = gas concentration (%) x flow rate. Peak CH4 and Steady CO2 values used.N/A Not applicable OEL Occupational exposure limit 5. Monitoring is carried out in line with procedures set by LKC Ltd with reference to CIRIA C665. Refer to procedural documents

% v/v Percentage volume by total volume

Flowing still increasing after 60 seconds. Pump failed at approximately 130 seconds, probable cause silt in the

base of the tap.

Peak flow at start, flow still decreasing after 60 seconds. Water flooded at surface.

Flow still increasing when finished.

Peak CO = 53. Flow decreasing slowly. Water pumped up at approximately 50 seconds.

2 readings taken as first failed after 5 seconds, bung quickly removed to wipe off silt at base of tap and

replaced. Left for 5 minutes before doing second reading.

Cloudy, stagnant/organic smell.

Notes

Peak CO of 4 in less then 5 seconds, water fflooded around well bong and tap. Released and then left for 5

minutes before recording.

Cloudy, stagnant/organic smell.Peak CO = 15ppm. Water bubbling at base of tubing.

Geotech Dipmeter Operating Normally

81070

ATMOSPHERIC / GROUND CONDITIONSFalling

Ground Conditions Wet

Serial Number CommentsRising then steady

Atmospheric Pressure Trend on SiteAtmospheric Pressure (Prev 24hrs)Weather Conditions Dry, cold, slight breeze

EQUIPMENT*1

G502417 Serviced, calibrated & gas checked.Instrument / Model Type

Geotechnical Instruments GA5000

Ellison Fold WayREF

VISIT

3-Oct-2019LKC 19 1374

EM and NJ

SITE

DATESTAFF

LK CONSULT LTD SiteJob Number

GAS MONITORING RECORD DateEngineerVisit of

Borehole ID Date & Time CH4

(%v/v)CO2

(%v/v)O2

(%v/v)Peak CH4

(%v/v)Peak CO2

(%v/v) % LEL2 CO Pod (ppm)

H2S Pod (ppm)

Balance (%)Barometric Pressure

(mb)

Internal Flow3

(l/hr)

Standing water level

(mbgl)

Installation base depth (mbgl)

WS101 16/10/2019 13:37 2.9 11.1 3.9 3.9 30.3 58 4 (8) 0 82.1 977 4 3.33 4.97WS102 16/10/2019 13:47 0 0.1 21.1 0.4 1.3 0 0 0 78.8 977 0 4.21 4.91WS103 16/10/2019 13:59 0.3 11.9 0.4 0.3 12.4 6 0 (1) 0 87.4 977 0 2.65 4.89WS104 16/10/2019 13:23 0.7 11.8 0.2 0.7 11.9 14 0 (49) 0 87.3 976 -0.1 2.29 5WS105 16/10/2019 14:14 1.1 13.1 0.2 1.1 13.2 22 0 (1) 0 85.6 977 0 1.76 2.92WS106 16/10/2019 14:36 0.2 15 0.1 0.2 51.4 4 0 (1) 0 84.7 977 4.3 0.95 1.66WS107 16/10/2019 14:24 0.4 1.0 19.3 4.0 10.8 8 0 (1) 0 79.3 977 -0.5 Damp 2.64WS108 16/10/2019 15:42 0.0 1.8 18.9 0.0 1.8 0 5 0 79.3 978 1.1 0 3.2WS109 16/10/2019 15:22 0.0 2.5 13.5 0.0 5.5 0 0 (2) 0 84 976 0.2 3.08 3.76WS110 16/10/2019 15:34 0.0 6.7 12.8 0.0 6.7 0 14 (44) 0 80.5 978 4.1 1.26 3.97WS111 16/10/2019 14:47 0.0 10 7.9 0.0 10 0 0 (1) 0 82.1 977 -1.4 Damp 3.77WS112 16/10/2019 15:09 0.0 2.1 0.2 0.1 2.1 0 2 (11) 0 97.7 976 -0.4 1.43 2.06WS113 16/10/2019 14:55 0.0 0.3 20.6 0.0 2.5 0 (3) 0 976 976 -1.2 0.49 2.37

NDNRUROSN/Appmmbl/hr

mbglLEL

Ellison Fold Way, BlackburnLKC 19 1374

16.10.19NJ

3 6

Equipment1 Atmospheric / Ground ConditionsInstrument Serial Number Comments Atmospheric pressure trend onsite Steady

Geotech Dipmeter 81070 Operating normally. Weather Conditions Dry, cloudy, slight breezeGas Analyser GA5000 G502417 Serviced, calibrated, gas checked. Atmospheric pressure (prev 24hrs) Rising then steady

Ground Conditions Wet/boggy

Notes

CO Peak in first 5s.

Water at ground level and sucked in after 20s.

ABBREVIATIONS NOTES

Data not stored, information taken from field sheet. Water sucked in at 60s.

Not detected All monitoring is carried out in line with LK Consult Ltd procedures, with reference to CIRIA C665.1Equipment is serviced and checked as recommended by the manufacturer. Refer to calibration records and service certificates.2CH4 is explosive between the range of 5-15%v/v. 100% lower explosive limit is equal to 5%v/v CH4.3Flow readings are based on a 1 minute average value where flow is detected (equipment range of +/- 12 ltr/hr).

Not recordedUnable to recordOff recordable scaleNot applicableParts per millionMillibarsLitres per hourMetres below ground levelLower explosive limit in air



Borehole ID Date & Time CH4

(%v/v)CO2

(%v/v)O2

(%v/v)Peak CH4

(%v/v)Peak CO2


H2S Pod (ppm)

Balance (%)

Barometric Pressure

(mb)

Internal Flow3 (l/hr)


(mbgl)

Installation base depth

(mbgl)WS101 13/11/2019 11:32 4.1 24.2 0 4.6 24.2 71.5 7 0 71.2 973 0.9 3.42 4.93WS102 13/11/2019 11:41 7.8 7.4 0 7.8 7.4 84.9 0 0 84.8 973 3 4.13 4.93WS103 13/11/2019 11:09 3.1 10.4 0 3.1 10.4 86.02 0 0 86.4 973 3.2 2.82 4.84WS104 13/11/2019 11:22 1.3 12.5 0.1 3.2 12.5 85.44 0 0 86.1 973 0 2.43 3WS105 13/11/2019 10:35 1.2 12.5 0 1.2 12.5 85.82 0 13 86.3 973 -0.1 1.89 1.98WS106 13/11/2019 10:52 1.3 13.4 0 1.3 13.4 0.48 0 0 85.4 973 6.7 0.96 1.78WS107 13/11/2019 10:57 3 3.6 15.7 3.7 9.3 16.76 1 0 77.8 973 0.3 2.6 2.61WS108 13/11/2019 09:05 0 0 21.5 0.1 0.5 0 0 0 78.4 974 5.6 0.1 3.02WS109WS110 13/11/2019 09:11 0 0.2 21.3 0 2 0 0 0 78.5 974 0.8 1.02 3.95WS111 13/11/2019 09:19 0 9.6 4.6 0 9.6 0 0 0 85.8 973 -3.4 2.72 2.77WS112 13/11/2019 10:10 0.2 2.4 0.4 0.2 2.4 0 4 0 97 972 -1.7 1.07 2.06WS113 13/11/2019 09:50 0 0.1 21.3 0 0.8 67.93 0 0 78.6 972 0 0.28 2.42


mbglLEL

Water to top of cap

Well flooded and left for 10 minutes

UR

Instrument Serial NumberEquipment1

Gas Analyser GA2000+

Comments

Geotech DipmeterGA10350

81070Serviced, calibrated, gas checked.

Operating normally.

Oily sheen to water

Atmospheric / Ground ConditionsAtmospheric pressure trend onsite Falling

Water to top of cap

Notes

NOTESAll monitoring is carried out in line with LK Consult Ltd procedures, with reference to CIRIA C665.1Equipment is serviced and checked as recommended by the manufacturer. Refer to calibration records and service certificates.2CH4 is explosive between the range of 5-15%v/v. 100% lower explosive limit is equal to 5%v/v CH4.3Flow readings are based on a 1 minute average value where flow is detected (equipment range of +/- 12 ltr/hr).

Not detectedNot recordedUnable to recordOff recordable scaleNot applicable

MillibarsLitres per hourMetres below ground levelLower explosive limit in air

ABBREVIATIONS

Parts per million

63

Wet

Ellison Fold Way, BlackburnLKC 19 137413/11/2019

MA

Ground Conditions

Atmospheric pressure (prev 24hrs) SteadyWeather Conditions Rainy, mild wind, cold



Borehole ID Date & Time

CH4

(%v/v)CO2

(%v/v)O2

(%v/v)Peak CH4

(%v/v)Peak CO2


H2S Pod (ppm)

Balance (%)

Barometric Pressure

(mb)



(mbgl)


(mbgl)WS101 25/11/2019 10:25 4.7 23.5 0.2 4.7 6.1 4.7 28 0 71.6 976 0.2 3.42 4.85WS102 25/11/2019 10:44 8.2 6.8 0.3 8.2 0 8.2 1 0 84.7 975 0.3 3.91 4.84WS103 25/11/2019 11:03 3.4 12.5 0.1 3.4 39 3.4 0 0 84 976 0.1 2.43 4.94WS104 25/11/2019 10:53 0.8 10.6 3.5 0.9 0 0.9 64 0 85.1 976 3.5 2.83 4.85WS105 25/11/2019 11:46 1.4 11.1 0.2 1.4 0 1.4 5 0 87.3 974 0.2 1.80 1.93WS106 25/11/2019 12:07 1.4 11.3 0.2 1.4 4 1.4 0 0 87.1 975 0.2 1.00 2.58WS107 25/11/2019 11:56 11.2 12.2 0.4 11.2 0 11.2 3 0 76.2 974 0.4 2.60 1.71WS108 25/11/2019 12:41 0 0.7 20 0 0 0 0 0 79.3 974 20.1 UR 5.32WS109 25/11/2019 12:32 UR UR UR 0.1 0 0.1 0 79.1 974 19.2 UR URWS110 UR UR UR UR UR UR UR UR UR UR UR UR UR URWS111 25/11/2019 12:56 0 1.2 19.2 0 0 0 0 0 79.6 975 10.5 UR URWS112 25/11/2019 13:17 0.1 0.8 16.2 0.1 0 0.1 0 82.9 973 8.3 1.60 1.99WS113 25/11/2019 13:07 UR UR UR 0 UR UR UR UR UR UR UR UR UR


mbglLEL

Ellison Fold Way, DarwenLKC 19 137425/11/2019

RW4 6

Equipment1 Atmospheric / Ground ConditionsInstrument Serial Number Comments Atmospheric pressure trend onsite Variable

Geotech Dipmeter 0 Operating normally. Weather Conditions Breezy, raining, cloudyGas Analyser GA5000 G502417 Serviced, calibrated, gas checked. Atmospheric pressure (prev 24hrs) Steady

Water taken up at 70 seconds.

Ground Conditions Boggy

Notes

Water taken up at 30 seconds.

ABBREVIATIONS NOTES

Unable to locate.

Not detected All monitoring is carried out in line with LK Consult Ltd procedures, with reference to CIRIA C665.1Equipment is serviced and checked as recommended by the manufacturer. Refer to calibration records and service certificates.2CH4 is explosive between the range of 5-15%v/v. 100% lower explosive limit is equal to 5%v/v CH4.3Flow readings are based on a 1 minute average value where flow is detected (equipment range of +/- 12 ltr/hr).

Not recordedUnable to recordOff recordable scaleNot applicableParts per millionMillibarsLitres per hourMetres below ground levelLower explosive limit in air



Borehole ID Date & Time

CH4

(%v/v)CO2

(%v/v)O2

(%v/v)Peak CH4

(%v/v)Peak CO2


H2S Pod (ppm)

Balance (%)

Barometric Pressure

(mb)



(mbgl)


(mbgl)WS101 11/12/2019 11:02 5.2 23.1 0 5.2 23.1 >>>> 1 0 71.7 975 3.6 3.39 4.94WS102 11/12/2019 11:11 8.3 7.3 0 8.3 7.3 >>>> 0 0 84.4 975 4.4 5.9 4.91WS103 11/12/2019 10:41 4.2 9.4 0 4.2 9.4 84 0 0 86.3 975 4.9 2.8 4.89WS104 11/12/2019 10:52 1.6 11.3 0.2 1.6 11.3 32 0 0 86.9 975 0 2.44 5.01WS105 11/12/2019 10:29 1.4 11.3 0 1.4 11.3 26 0 0 87.4 975 2.3 1.88 1.99WS106 11/12/2019 10:11 0.9 11.1 0 0.9 11.1 18 0 0 88 975 0 0.81 1.78WS107 11/12/2019 10:20 11.9 9.9 0 12.1 9.9 >>>> 0 0 78.2 975 0.5 2.52 2.63WS108 11/12/2019 09:02 0.1 2.5 16.7 0.1 2.5 2 0 0 80.8 975 9.8 0.05 3.02WS109 11/12/2019 09:27 0.1 0.5 20 0.1 0.5 0 0 0 79.4 975 -1.8 2.34 3.69WS110 11/12/2019 09:11 0.1 6.3 8.3 0.1 6.3 0 74 0 85.2 975 0 0.7 3.96WS111 11/12/2019 09:32 0.1 8 4.3 0.1 8 0 0 0 87 975 -1.3 2.77 2.79WS112 11/12/2019 09:44 0.2 2.7 8.2 0.2 2.7 4 0 0 89 975 -1.3 0.59 2.04WS113 11/12/2019 09:54 0.1 3.5 10.7 0.1 3.5 0 0 0 85.7 975 18.1 0.2 2.44


mbglLEL

Instrument Serial NumberEquipment1

Gas Analyser GA2000+

Comments

Geotech DipmeterGA10350

81070Serviced, calibrated, gas checked.

Operating normally.

Water in tube at 20 seconds.

Water to just under top of cap. Pump flow fail at 160 seconds.

Atmospheric / Ground ConditionsAtmospheric pressure trend onsite Steady

Water to just under top of cap. Water in tube at 80 seconds.

Notes

NOTESAll monitoring is carried out in line with LK Consult Ltd procedures, with reference to CIRIA C665.1Equipment is serviced and checked as recommended by the manufacturer. Refer to calibration records and service certificates.2CH4 is explosive between the range of 5-15%v/v. 100% lower explosive limit is equal to 5%v/v CH4.3Flow readings are based on a 1 minute average value where flow is detected (equipment range of +/- 12 ltr/hr).

Not detectedNot recordedUnable to recordOff recordable scaleNot applicable

MillibarsLitres per hourMetres below ground levelLower explosive limit in air

ABBREVIATIONS

Parts per million

65

Wet

Ellsion Fold Way, BlackburnLKC 19 137411/12/2019

MA

Ground Conditions

Atmospheric pressure (prev 24hrs) Steady then fallingWeather Conditions Cloudy, windy, cold

LK CONSULT LTD

GAS MONITORING RECORD

6 of 6

Borehole ID Date/TimeCH4

(% v/v)

CO2

(% v/v)

O2

(% v/v)

Peak CH4

(% v/v)

Peak CO2

(% v/v)

% of Lower

Explosive

Limit*2

CO Pod

(ppm)

H2S Pod

(ppm)

Balance

(%)

Barometric

Pressure (mb)

Relative

Pressure (mb)

Internal Flow

*3 (ltr/hr)

Standing Water

Level (mbgl)

Installation Base

Dip (mbgl)

WS101 23/12/2019 09:46 7.2 24.7 0.2 7.2 24.7 7.2 0.0 0.0 67.9 978 0.4 (-9.4) -3.8 3.4 4.85

WS102 23/12/2019 09:59 7.9 6.8 0.8 7.9 6.8 7.9 0.0 0.0 84.5 978 0.7 (-9.5) -9.1 3.8 4.85

WS103 23/12/2019 10:09 2.2 9.6 0.0 2.2 9.8 2.2 0.0 0.0 88.2 978 0.8 (-4.1) 0 2.68 4.8

WS104 23/12/2019 10:23 0.5 5.9 0.1 0.5 5.9 0.5 (8) 0 0.0 93.5 978 0.7 0.0 2.05 5.93

WS105 23/12/2019 11:02 1.2 10.8 0.0 1.2 10.8 1.2 (1) 0 0.0 88.0 978 0.7 (-10.3) -7.8 1.88 1.93

WS106 23/12/2019 10:53 0.9 9.6 0.2 0.8 9.6 0.8 (1) 0 0.0 89.3 978 0.5 (-10.2) -3.2 2.6 3.6

WS107 23/12/2019 11:11 1.9 2.1 16.7 5.8 5.5 5.8 (5) 0 0.0 79.3 978 0.6 (-5.2) -1.7 Dry 2.57

WS108 23/12/2019 11:27 0.0 0.2 20.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 (6) 0 0.0 79.3 978 0.6 (-0.8) -0.1 At the surface 2.95

WS109 23/12/2019 10:41 0.0 0.3 19.6 0.0 2.1 0.0 (1) 0 0.0 80.1 978 0.7 -0.1 2.6 3.6

WS110 23/12/2019 11:20 0.0 5.6 13.3 0.1 5.6 0.1 (6) 0 0.0 81.1 978 0.6 (-11) -0.1 0.42 3.87

WS111 23/12/2019 11:49 0.0 0.1 20.8 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.1 978 0.8 (-2.3) -0 Dry 2.7

WS112 23/12/2019 11:41 0.0 1.7 18.5 0.0 2.1 0.0 (1) 0 0.0 79.8 978 0.4 (-15.7) -2.5 0.47 1.98

WS113 23/12/2019 11:57 0.0 1.1 16.4 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.5 978 0.7 (-9.7) -4.5 0.2 2.3

ABBREVIATIONS NOTES*1 Refer to Note 1 ppm Parts per million 1. Equipment is serviced and checked as recommended by the manufacturer. Refer to calibration records.

ND Not detected mb Millibars and service certificates.NR Not recorded ltr/hr Litres per hour 2. CH4 is explosive between the range of 5 - 15% v/v. 100% lower explosive limit is equal to 5% v/v CH4.UR Unable to record mbgl Metres below ground level 3. Flow readings are based on a 1 minute average value where flow is detected (equipment range of +/- 12 ltr/hr)OS Off recordable scale LEL Lower explosive limit in air 4. After CIRIA C665. GSV = gas concentration (%) x flow rate. Peak CH4 and Steady CO2 values used.N/A Not applicable OEL Occupational exposure limit 5. Monitoring is carried out in line with procedures set by LKC Ltd with reference to CIRIA C665. Refer to procedural documents

Flow still decreasing. Water in after approximately

20s.

Flow still decreasing.

Water sucked in immediately.

Flow failed at approx 120s.

Bung not replaced securely. Left for a few minutes

before measuring.

Flow still decreasing. Water bubbling within tube.


Bung not replaced securely, came away as tubing

was added. Water bubbling within tube.



Ground Conditions Wet

Notes

Geotechnical Instruments GA2000+ GA10350 Serviced, calibrated & gas checked. Atmospheric Pressure (Prev 24hrs) Rising

Geotech Dipmeter 122-006309-1 Operating Normally Weather Conditions Cloudy, dry, windy

STAFF NJVISIT

EQUIPMENT*1 ATMOSPHERIC / GROUND CONDITIONS

Instrument / Model Type Serial Number Comments Atmospheric Pressure Trend on Site Steady

SITE Ellison Fold Way, BlackburnREF LKC 19 1374

DATE 23.12.2019



Appendix F

Certificate of Analysis – Geotechnical



Appendix G

Statistical Output Sheets

Test Results Client/client ref: LKC 19 1374 Site ref: Date: 00-Jan-1900Project ref: Ellison Fold Way Data description: User details:

Dataset:Sample mean 16.248 Outliers present? No

Sample standard deviation, s 7.7527 Significance level

Sample size, n 29 Outliers excluded 0

Critical concentration, Cc 37 Non-detects 0

Normality testSignificance level:

Non-normal distribution

Use: evidence levelevidence level 100%

Base decision on: 2

Evidence level required: 95%Balance of probability? N/A

Reject Null Hypothesis?

Evidence against Null hypothesis:

Yes

µ < Cc (re this dataset)

Arsenic

Outliers & non-detects

Null hypothesis:

Alternative hypothesis:

The true mean concentration is equal to or greater than the critical concentration: µ ≥ Cc

The true mean concentration is less than the critical concentration: µ < Cc

Test scenario:

01234567

-20 0 20 40 60

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 1

1.2

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

Back to summaryBack to data Go to outlier test

Sample mean concentration

16.25

Upper Confidence Limit 22.52

Critical concentration 37.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Prob

abili

ty th

at tr

ue m

ean

exce

eds

the

conc

entr

atio

n gi

ven

on th

e x

axis

Concentration

Go to normality test

x


Dataset:Sample mean 1.9232 Outliers present? No

Sample standard deviation, s 0.2903 Significance level


Critical concentration, Cc 2.3 Non-detects 0


Normal distribution

Use: evidence level 100%evidence level

Base decision on: 2




Yes


Lead log


Null hypothesis:




Test scenario:

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 1 2 3 4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 1

1.2

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3


Sample mean concentration 1.92


Critical concentration 2.3

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Prob

abili

ty th

at tr

ue m

ean

exce

eds

the

conc

entr

atio

n gi

ven

on th

e x

axis

Concentration


x


Dataset:Sample mean 1.3183 Outliers present? YesSample standard deviation, s 1.9852 Significance level


Critical concentration, Cc 5 Non-detects 9


Non-normal distribution

Use: evidence levelevidence level 99%

Base decision on: 2




Yes


Benzo[a]pyrene


Null hypothesis:




Test scenario:

0

5

10

15

20

-10 -5 0 5 10 15

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

-0.2 0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 1

1.2

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3


Sample mean concentration 1.32


Critical concentration 5.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Prob

abili

ty th

at tr

ue m

ean

exce

eds

the

conc

entr

atio

n gi

ven

on th

e x

axis

Concentration


x



Appendix H

Hazard Index Output Sheets

Residential with Plant Uptake Land Use

Job Ellison Fold WayJob No. LKC 19 1374SOM 1.0Comment Bold Italic indicate <LOD used.

Residential With Plant Uptake1%

C4SLAliphaticEC5-EC6 42 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0EC6-EC8 100 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0EC8-EC10 27 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0EC10-EC12 130 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0EC12-EC16 1100 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0EC16-EC21EC21-EC35EC35-EC44 65000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

AromaticEC5-EC7 (benzene) 70 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0EC7-EC8 (tolulene) 130 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0EC8-EC10 34 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0EC10-EC12 74 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0EC12-EC16 140 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.2 1.0 1.0 1.0EC16-EC21 260 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 23 31 1.0 1.0 3.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 30 1.0 1.0 2.7EC21-EC35 1100 1.0 72.0 140 1.0 96 2.5 1.0 1.0 71 1.0 1.0 1.0 30 1.0 1.0 67EC35-EC44 1100 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

HI 0.16 0.22 0.28 0.16 0.33 0.27 0.16 0.16 0.23 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.30 0.16 0.16 0.22

120.0 1.065000 1.0

TP106TP104TP104TP101WS112 d2WS112 d1

65 471.01.01.01.01.0

TP112

1.0131.01.01.0

WS111 d1

1.0

WS109 d2 WS107WS106WS105WS103TP116TP114TP114

16

HI = HQ Fi= Measured concentration Fi (mg/kg)Fi=1 SGV/GAC Fi (mg/kg)

where: HI = Hazard IndexHQ = Hazard QuotientFi = Fraction ISGV/GAC = Soil Guideline Value or Generic Assessment Criteria



Appendix I

Waste Classification Sheets

www.hazwasteonline.com X6T2T-7AWVF-YQHY5 Page 1 of 118

Waste Classification Report

X6T2T-7AWVF-YQHY5

Job name

LKC 19 1374

Description/Comments

In-situ testing data from Phase 2 Geo-Environmental Investigation. None targeted sampling grid.

Project

LKC 19 1374

Site

Ellison Fold Way

Related Documents# Name Description1 HWOL-19-30908-20190919 175403.hwol .hwol file used to create the Job2 HWOL-19-30956-20190919 175439.hwol .hwol file used to create the Job3 HWOL-19-32243-20191004 172449.hwol .hwol file used to create the Job

Waste Stream Template

Example waste stream template for contaminated soils

Classified by

Name:Peter DunnDate:10 Oct 2019 14:02 GMTTelephone:0161 763 7200

Company:LK GroupUnit 29, Eton Business ParkEton Hill Rd, RadcliffeManchesterM26 2ZS

Report

Created by: Peter DunnCreated date: 10 Oct 2019 14:02 GMT

Job summary# Sample Name Depth [m] Classification Result Hazard properties Page1 WS101-895301-10/09/2019-0.20 0.20-1.20 Non Hazardous 3

2 WS102-895303-10/09/2019-0.00 0.00-0.60 Non Hazardous 5

3 WS102-895305-10/09/2019-3.00 3.00-3.50 Non Hazardous 7

4 WS103-895306-10/09/2019-0.00 0.00-0.60 Non Hazardous 9

5 WS103-895307-10/09/2019-0.60 0.60-1.20 Non Hazardous 12

6 WS104-895308-10/09/2019-0.00 0.00-0.30 Non Hazardous 13

7 WS104-895309-10/09/2019-0.30 0.30-1.30 Non Hazardous 15

8 WS105-895310-10/09/2019-0.00 0.00-0.20 Non Hazardous 16

9 WS105-895311-10/09/2019-0.20 0.20-1.00 Non Hazardous 18

10 WS106-895312-10/09/2019-0.00 0.00-0.30 Non Hazardous 21

Report created by Peter Dunn on 10 Oct 2019

Page 2 of 118 X6T2T-7AWVF-YQHY5 www.hazwasteonline.com

# Sample Name Depth [m] Classification Result Hazard properties Page11 WS106-895313-10/09/2019-0.50 0.50-0.80 Non Hazardous 24

12 WS107-895314-10/09/2019-0.00 0.00-0.30 Non Hazardous 25

13 WS107-895315-10/09/2019-0.50 0.50-0.80 Non Hazardous 28

14 WS108-895316-10/09/2019-0.00 0.00-0.30 Non Hazardous 30

15 TP101-888782-10/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.3 Non Hazardous 32

16 TP102-888784-10/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.5 Non Hazardous 35

17 TP102-888785-10/09/2019-0.5 0.5-1.5 Non Hazardous 37

18 TP103-888786-10/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.3 Non Hazardous 38

19 TP103-888787-10/09/2019-0.3 0.3-1.3 Non Hazardous 40

20 TP104-888789-10/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.2 Non Hazardous 41

21 TP104-888790-10/09/2019-0.2 0.2-1.2 Non Hazardous 44

22 TP105-888791-10/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.2 Non Hazardous 47

23 TP105-888792-10/09/2019-0.2 0.2-1.2 Non Hazardous 49

24 TP106-888793-10/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.3 Non Hazardous 50

25 TP106-888794-10/09/2019-0.3 0.3-1.1 Non Hazardous 52

26 TP107-888796-10/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.3 Non Hazardous 55

27 TP107-888797-10/09/2019-0.3 0.3-1.3 Non Hazardous 57

28 TP108-888798-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.2 Non Hazardous 58

29 TP108-888799-11/09/2019-0.2 0.2-1.2 Non Hazardous 60

30 TP109-888800-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.3 Non Hazardous 61

31 TP110-888802-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.3 Non Hazardous 63

32 TP110-888803-11/09/2019-0.3 0.3-1.3 Non Hazardous 65

33 TP111-888804-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.3 Non Hazardous 66

34 TP111-888805-11/09/2019-0.3 0.3-1.3 Non Hazardous 68

35 TP112-888806-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.3 Non Hazardous 69

36 TP113-888808-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.3 Non Hazardous 72

37 TP113-888809-11/09/2019-0.3 0.3-1.3 Non Hazardous 74

38 TP114-888810-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.4 Non Hazardous 75

39 TP114-888811-11/09/2019-0.4 0.4-1.4 Non Hazardous 78

40 TP115-888812-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.2 Non Hazardous 81

41 TP115-888813-11/09/2019-0.2 0.2-1.0 Non Hazardous 83

42 TP116-888814-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.2 Non Hazardous 84

43 TP116-888815-11/09/2019-0.2 0.2-1.2 Non Hazardous 86

44 TP117-888816-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.2 Non Hazardous 89

45 TP117-888817-11/09/2019-0.2 0.2-1.2 Non Hazardous 91

46 WS109 d1-888536-11/09/2019-0.0 0.0-0.2 Non Hazardous 93










Appendices PageAppendix A: Classifier defined and non CLP determinands 116Appendix B: Rationale for selection of metal species 117Appendix C: Version 118



Classification of sample: WS101-895301-10/09/2019-0.20

Non Hazardous WasteClassified as 17 05 04

in the List of Waste

Sample details

Sample Name:WS101-895301-10/09/2019-0.20Sample Depth:0.20-1.20 mMoisture content:18%(wet weight correction)

LoW Code:Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including excavated soil

from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in 17 05

03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands

Moisture content: 18% Wet Weight Moisture Correction applied (MC)

#Determinand

CLP

Not

e

User entered dataConv.Factor

Compound conc.Classification

value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed

CLP index number EC Number CAS Number

1arsenic { arsenic trioxide }

9 mg/kg 1.32 9.744 mg/kg 0.000974 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3

2cadmium { cadmium oxide }

<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0

3chromium in chromium(III) compounds { chromium(III)oxide } 23 mg/kg 1.462 27.565 mg/kg 0.00276 %

215-160-9 1308-38-9

4chromium in chromium(VI) compounds { chromium(VI)oxide } <0.5 mg/kg 1.923 <0.962 mg/kg <0.0000962 % <LOD

024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0

5copper { dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide }

16 mg/kg 1.126 14.772 mg/kg 0.00148 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1

6lead { lead compounds with the exception of thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex } 1 23 mg/kg 18.86 mg/kg 0.00189 %

082-001-00-6

7mercury { mercury dichloride }

<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8

nickel { nickel(II) oxide (nickel monoxide) }

18 mg/kg 1.273 18.783 mg/kg 0.00188 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9

selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } <0.2 mg/kg 2.554 <0.511 mg/kg <0.0000511 % <LOD

034-002-00-8

10zinc { zinc oxide }

40 mg/kg 1.245 40.827 mg/kg 0.00408 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.2 pH 6.2 pH 6.2 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.32 mg/kg 0.262 mg/kg 0.0000262 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

0.21 mg/kg 0.172 mg/kg 0.0000172 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.24 mg/kg 0.197 mg/kg 0.0000197 % 204-927-3 129-00-0

20benzo[a]anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9

22benzo[b]fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2

23benzo[k]fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9

24benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8

25indeno[123-cd]pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5

26dibenz[a,h]anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3

27benzo[ghi]perylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2

28vanadium { divanadium pentaoxide; vanadium pentoxide }

27 mg/kg 1.785 39.524 mg/kg 0.00395 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0174 %

KeyUser supplied data

Determinand values ignored for classification, see column 'Conc. Not Used' for reason

Determinand defined or amended by HazWasteOnline (see Appendix A)

Speciated Deteminand - Unless the Determinand is Note 1, the Conversion Factor is used to calculate the compoundconcentration

<LOD Below limit of detectionCLP: Note 1 Only the metal concentration has been used for classification






Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



38 mg/kg 1.32 39.636 mg/kg 0.00396 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.5 mg/kg 1.142 0.451 mg/kg 0.0000451 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


100 mg/kg 1.126 88.945 mg/kg 0.00889 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.25 mg/kg 1.353 0.267 mg/kg 0.0000267 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


27 mg/kg 1.273 27.144 mg/kg 0.00271 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9

selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } 0.41 mg/kg 2.554 0.827 mg/kg 0.0000827 %

034-002-00-8


200 mg/kg 1.245 196.665 mg/kg 0.0197 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.4 pH 6.4 pH 6.4 pH PH

12naphthalene

0.42 mg/kg 0.332 mg/kg 0.0000332 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

0.68 mg/kg 0.537 mg/kg 0.0000537 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

0.4 mg/kg 0.316 mg/kg 0.0000316 % 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

4.7 mg/kg 3.713 mg/kg 0.000371 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

0.77 mg/kg 0.608 mg/kg 0.0000608 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

6.1 mg/kg 4.819 mg/kg 0.000482 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

5.3 mg/kg 4.187 mg/kg 0.000419 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


2.2 mg/kg 1.738 mg/kg 0.000174 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

2.6 mg/kg 2.054 mg/kg 0.000205 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


2.8 mg/kg 2.212 mg/kg 0.000221 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.97 mg/kg 0.766 mg/kg 0.0000766 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


2.2 mg/kg 1.738 mg/kg 0.000174 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.94 mg/kg 0.743 mg/kg 0.0000743 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


1.2 mg/kg 0.948 mg/kg 0.0000948 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


32 mg/kg 1.785 45.129 mg/kg 0.00451 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.063 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



8.2 mg/kg 1.32 9.744 mg/kg 0.000974 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.14 mg/kg 1.142 0.144 mg/kg 0.0000144 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


17 mg/kg 1.126 17.226 mg/kg 0.00172 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


27 mg/kg 1.273 30.924 mg/kg 0.00309 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


53 mg/kg 1.245 59.373 mg/kg 0.00594 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

8.2 pH 8.2 pH 8.2 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


27 mg/kg 1.785 43.38 mg/kg 0.00434 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.021 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



21 mg/kg 1.32 20.241 mg/kg 0.00202 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3

2boron { diboron trioxide; boric oxide }

<0.4 mg/kg 3.22 <1.288 mg/kg <0.000129 % <LOD005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.27 mg/kg 1.142 0.225 mg/kg 0.0000225 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


38 mg/kg 1.126 31.232 mg/kg 0.00312 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.19 mg/kg 1.353 0.188 mg/kg 0.0000188 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


16 mg/kg 1.273 14.864 mg/kg 0.00149 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


130 mg/kg 1.245 118.123 mg/kg 0.0118 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

12TPH (C6 to C40) petroleum group

62 mg/kg 45.26 mg/kg 0.00453 % TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13tert-butyl methyl ether; MTBE;2-methoxy-2-methylpropane <0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD

603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

0.0015 mg/kg 0.0011 mg/kg 0.00000011 %601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18

cyanides { salts of hydrogen cyanide with theexception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides,ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex }

<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6 pH 6 pH 6pH PH

20naphthalene

0.35 mg/kg 0.255 mg/kg 0.0000255 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

0.35 mg/kg 0.255 mg/kg 0.0000255 % 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

0.57 mg/kg 0.416 mg/kg 0.0000416 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

0.65 mg/kg 0.475 mg/kg 0.0000475 % 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

5.3 mg/kg 3.869 mg/kg 0.000387 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

0.99 mg/kg 0.723 mg/kg 0.0000723 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

6.2 mg/kg 4.526 mg/kg 0.000453 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

5.9 mg/kg 4.307 mg/kg 0.000431 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


2.4 mg/kg 1.752 mg/kg 0.000175 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

3.1 mg/kg 2.263 mg/kg 0.000226 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


3.5 mg/kg 2.555 mg/kg 0.000256 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


1.2 mg/kg 0.876 mg/kg 0.0000876 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


2.8 mg/kg 2.044 mg/kg 0.000204 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


1.5 mg/kg 1.095 mg/kg 0.000109 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


0.16 mg/kg 0.117 mg/kg 0.0000117 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


1.5 mg/kg 1.095 mg/kg 0.000109 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


23 mg/kg 1.785 29.973 mg/kg 0.003 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0389 %








Supplementary Hazardous Property Information

HP 3(i): Flammable "flammable liquid waste: liquid waste having a flash point below 60°C or waste gas oil, diesel and light heating oilshaving a flash point > 55°C and <= 75°C"Force this Hazardous property to non hazardous because TPH source from ash or natural organic material withinsample. No free draining liquid, no olfactory evidence, no anticipated sources identified and and no other evidence ofhydrocarbon contamination in samples. Concentrations at less than 1.0% are "unlikely to be flammable". Flammability ofsoils is unlikely to result in a hazardous classification in soils (AGS Waste Classification – A Practitioner’s Guide).

Hazard Statements hit:

Flam. Liq. 2; H225 "Highly flammable liquid and vapour."

Because of determinand:

toluene: (conc.: 1.1e-07%)

Flam. Liq. 3; H226 "Flammable liquid and vapour."


TPH (C6 to C40) petroleum group: (conc.: 0.00453%)






Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.2 pH 6.2 pH 6.2 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



15 mg/kg 1.32 14.854 mg/kg 0.00149 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.24 mg/kg 1.142 0.206 mg/kg 0.0000206 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


34 mg/kg 1.126 28.71 mg/kg 0.00287 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.18 mg/kg 1.353 0.183 mg/kg 0.0000183 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


17 mg/kg 1.273 16.226 mg/kg 0.00162 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


110 mg/kg 1.245 102.689 mg/kg 0.0103 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.5 pH 6.5 pH 6.5 pH PH

12naphthalene

1.2 mg/kg 0.9 mg/kg 0.00009 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

0.16 mg/kg 0.12 mg/kg 0.000012 % 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

1.2 mg/kg 0.9 mg/kg 0.00009 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

0.95 mg/kg 0.713 mg/kg 0.0000712 % 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

7.4 mg/kg 5.55 mg/kg 0.000555 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

1.7 mg/kg 1.275 mg/kg 0.000127 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

7.2 mg/kg 5.4 mg/kg 0.00054 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

6.8 mg/kg 5.1 mg/kg 0.00051 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


3.1 mg/kg 2.325 mg/kg 0.000233 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

3.6 mg/kg 2.7 mg/kg 0.00027 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


3.9 mg/kg 2.925 mg/kg 0.000293 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


1.4 mg/kg 1.05 mg/kg 0.000105 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


3.1 mg/kg 2.325 mg/kg 0.000233 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


1.7 mg/kg 1.275 mg/kg 0.000127 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


0.23 mg/kg 0.173 mg/kg 0.0000173 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


1.7 mg/kg 1.275 mg/kg 0.000127 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


27 mg/kg 1.785 36.15 mg/kg 0.00361 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0326 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.4 pH 6.4 pH 6.4 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



19 mg/kg 1.32 20.069 mg/kg 0.00201 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.18 mg/kg 1.142 0.164 mg/kg 0.0000164 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


38 mg/kg 1.126 34.227 mg/kg 0.00342 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.31 mg/kg 1.353 0.336 mg/kg 0.0000336 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


18 mg/kg 1.273 18.325 mg/kg 0.00183 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


61 mg/kg 1.245 60.742 mg/kg 0.00607 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.8 pH 6.8 pH 6.8 pH PH

12naphthalene

0.73 mg/kg 0.584 mg/kg 0.0000584 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

0.6 mg/kg 0.48 mg/kg 0.000048 % 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

0.43 mg/kg 0.344 mg/kg 0.0000344 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

0.83 mg/kg 0.664 mg/kg 0.0000664 % 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

8 mg/kg 6.4 mg/kg 0.00064 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

1.2 mg/kg 0.96 mg/kg 0.000096 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

7 mg/kg 5.6 mg/kg 0.00056 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

5.7 mg/kg 4.56 mg/kg 0.000456 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


2.2 mg/kg 1.76 mg/kg 0.000176 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

2.9 mg/kg 2.32 mg/kg 0.000232 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


2.9 mg/kg 2.32 mg/kg 0.000232 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


1.1 mg/kg 0.88 mg/kg 0.000088 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


2.2 mg/kg 1.76 mg/kg 0.000176 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


1.2 mg/kg 0.96 mg/kg 0.000096 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


0.13 mg/kg 0.104 mg/kg 0.0000104 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


1.2 mg/kg 0.96 mg/kg 0.000096 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


28 mg/kg 1.785 39.988 mg/kg 0.004 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0289 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



14 mg/kg 1.32 15.342 mg/kg 0.00153 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.4 mg/kg 3.22 <1.288 mg/kg <0.000129 % <LOD005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.4 mg/kg 1.142 0.379 mg/kg 0.0000379 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


31 mg/kg 1.126 28.969 mg/kg 0.0029 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.14 mg/kg 1.353 0.157 mg/kg 0.0000157 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


25 mg/kg 1.273 26.406 mg/kg 0.00264 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


50 mg/kg 1.245 51.656 mg/kg 0.00517 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

0.0018 mg/kg 0.0014 mg/kg 0.000000149 %601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6.9 pH 6.9 pH 6.9 pH PH

20naphthalene

0.18 mg/kg 0.149 mg/kg 0.0000149 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

1.2 mg/kg 0.996 mg/kg 0.0000996 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

0.19 mg/kg 0.158 mg/kg 0.0000158 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

1.2 mg/kg 0.996 mg/kg 0.0000996 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

1.2 mg/kg 0.996 mg/kg 0.0000996 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.41 mg/kg 0.34 mg/kg 0.000034 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

0.41 mg/kg 0.34 mg/kg 0.000034 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.32 mg/kg 0.266 mg/kg 0.0000266 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.19 mg/kg 0.158 mg/kg 0.0000158 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


26 mg/kg 1.785 38.524 mg/kg 0.00385 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0253 %



















Sample details

Sample Name:WS106-895312-10/09/2019-0.00Sample Depth:0.00-0.30 mMoisture content:9.9%(wet weight correction)



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands

Moisture content: 9.9% Wet Weight Moisture Correction applied (MC)

#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



7 mg/kg 1.32 8.327 mg/kg 0.000833 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.4 mg/kg 3.22 <1.288 mg/kg <0.000129 % <LOD005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


17 mg/kg 1.126 17.245 mg/kg 0.00172 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


21 mg/kg 1.273 24.079 mg/kg 0.00241 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


37 mg/kg 1.245 41.495 mg/kg 0.00415 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

0.0017 mg/kg 0.0015 mg/kg 0.000000153 %601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

5.8 pH 5.8 pH 5.8 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


23 mg/kg 1.785 36.994 mg/kg 0.0037 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0184 %



















Sample details

Sample Name:WS106-895313-10/09/2019-0.50Sample Depth:0.50-0.80 mMoisture content:9.1%(wet weight correction)



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.2 pH 6.2 pH 6.2 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



11 mg/kg 1.32 11.764 mg/kg 0.00118 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.4 mg/kg 3.22 <1.288 mg/kg <0.000129 % <LOD005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


18 mg/kg 1.126 16.415 mg/kg 0.00164 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


21 mg/kg 1.273 21.647 mg/kg 0.00216 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


50 mg/kg 1.245 50.411 mg/kg 0.00504 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


120 mg/kg 97.2 mg/kg 0.00972 % TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6.4 pH 6.4 pH 6.4 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

1.1 mg/kg 0.891 mg/kg 0.0000891 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

0.12 mg/kg 0.0972 mg/kg 0.00000972 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

1.3 mg/kg 1.053 mg/kg 0.000105 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

1.2 mg/kg 0.972 mg/kg 0.0000972 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.26 mg/kg 0.211 mg/kg 0.0000211 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

0.37 mg/kg 0.3 mg/kg 0.00003 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.31 mg/kg 0.251 mg/kg 0.0000251 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.21 mg/kg 0.17 mg/kg 0.000017 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.13 mg/kg 0.105 mg/kg 0.0000105 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


27 mg/kg 1.785 39.042 mg/kg 0.0039 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0305 %



















Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



8.9 mg/kg 1.32 10.223 mg/kg 0.00102 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


17 mg/kg 1.126 16.652 mg/kg 0.00167 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


30 mg/kg 1.273 33.215 mg/kg 0.00332 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


53 mg/kg 1.245 57.394 mg/kg 0.00574 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6 pH 6 pH 6pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.19 mg/kg 0.165 mg/kg 0.0000165 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

0.13 mg/kg 0.113 mg/kg 0.0000113 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.14 mg/kg 0.122 mg/kg 0.0000122 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


31 mg/kg 1.785 48.146 mg/kg 0.00481 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.022 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



11 mg/kg 1.32 12.055 mg/kg 0.00121 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.16 mg/kg 1.142 0.152 mg/kg 0.0000152 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


21 mg/kg 1.126 19.624 mg/kg 0.00196 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.16 mg/kg 1.353 0.18 mg/kg 0.000018 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


13 mg/kg 1.273 13.731 mg/kg 0.00137 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


81 mg/kg 1.245 83.682 mg/kg 0.00837 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.1 pH 6.1 pH 6.1 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.95 mg/kg 0.789 mg/kg 0.0000788 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

0.15 mg/kg 0.125 mg/kg 0.0000124 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

1 mg/kg 0.83 mg/kg 0.000083 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.8 mg/kg 0.664 mg/kg 0.0000664 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.23 mg/kg 0.191 mg/kg 0.0000191 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.22 mg/kg 0.183 mg/kg 0.0000183 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


28 mg/kg 1.785 41.488 mg/kg 0.00415 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0255 %








Classification of sample: TP101-888782-10/09/2019-0.0



Sample details

Sample Name:TP101-888782-10/09/2019-0.0Sample Depth:0.0-0.3 mMoisture content:26%(wet weight correction)



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



12 mg/kg 1.32 11.724 mg/kg 0.00117 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.43 mg/kg 3.22 1.025 mg/kg 0.000102 %005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.33 mg/kg 1.142 0.279 mg/kg 0.0000279 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


36 mg/kg 1.126 29.994 mg/kg 0.003 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.18 mg/kg 1.353 0.18 mg/kg 0.000018 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


15 mg/kg 1.273 14.126 mg/kg 0.00141 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


100 mg/kg 1.245 92.109 mg/kg 0.00921 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


180 mg/kg 133.2 mg/kg 0.0133 % TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6.3 pH 6.3 pH 6.3 pH PH

20naphthalene

0.26 mg/kg 0.192 mg/kg 0.0000192 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

0.18 mg/kg 0.133 mg/kg 0.0000133 % 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

0.92 mg/kg 0.681 mg/kg 0.0000681 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

0.7 mg/kg 0.518 mg/kg 0.0000518 % 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

6.5 mg/kg 4.81 mg/kg 0.000481 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

1.3 mg/kg 0.962 mg/kg 0.0000962 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

8.3 mg/kg 6.142 mg/kg 0.000614 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

7 mg/kg 5.18 mg/kg 0.000518 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


3.2 mg/kg 2.368 mg/kg 0.000237 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

3.5 mg/kg 2.59 mg/kg 0.000259 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


4.1 mg/kg 3.034 mg/kg 0.000303 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


1.4 mg/kg 1.036 mg/kg 0.000104 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


3.3 mg/kg 2.442 mg/kg 0.000244 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


1.9 mg/kg 1.406 mg/kg 0.000141 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


0.39 mg/kg 0.289 mg/kg 0.0000289 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


1.8 mg/kg 1.332 mg/kg 0.000133 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


22 mg/kg 1.785 29.063 mg/kg 0.00291 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0454 %



















Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



17 mg/kg 1.32 16.161 mg/kg 0.00162 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.23 mg/kg 1.142 0.189 mg/kg 0.0000189 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


60 mg/kg 1.126 48.638 mg/kg 0.00486 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.22 mg/kg 1.353 0.214 mg/kg 0.0000214 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


27 mg/kg 1.273 24.739 mg/kg 0.00247 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


160 mg/kg 1.245 143.391 mg/kg 0.0143 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.3 pH 6.3 pH 6.3 pH PH

12naphthalene

0.21 mg/kg 0.151 mg/kg 0.0000151 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

0.27 mg/kg 0.194 mg/kg 0.0000194 % 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

0.3 mg/kg 0.216 mg/kg 0.0000216 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

0.32 mg/kg 0.23 mg/kg 0.000023 % 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

3.6 mg/kg 2.592 mg/kg 0.000259 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

1.3 mg/kg 0.936 mg/kg 0.0000936 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

8.1 mg/kg 5.832 mg/kg 0.000583 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

6.8 mg/kg 4.896 mg/kg 0.00049 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


3.3 mg/kg 2.376 mg/kg 0.000238 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

3.5 mg/kg 2.52 mg/kg 0.000252 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


4.2 mg/kg 3.024 mg/kg 0.000302 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


1.4 mg/kg 1.008 mg/kg 0.000101 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


3.5 mg/kg 2.52 mg/kg 0.000252 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


2.1 mg/kg 1.512 mg/kg 0.000151 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


0.39 mg/kg 0.281 mg/kg 0.0000281 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


1.9 mg/kg 1.368 mg/kg 0.000137 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


25 mg/kg 1.785 32.133 mg/kg 0.00321 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.045 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6 pH 6 pH 6pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



17 mg/kg 1.32 15.712 mg/kg 0.00157 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.49 mg/kg 1.142 0.392 mg/kg 0.0000392 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


47 mg/kg 1.126 37.042 mg/kg 0.0037 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1

6lead { lead compounds with the exception of thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex } 1 140 mg/kg 98 mg/kg 0.0098 %

082-001-00-6


0.24 mg/kg 1.353 0.227 mg/kg 0.0000227 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


20 mg/kg 1.273 17.816 mg/kg 0.00178 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


180 mg/kg 1.245 156.834 mg/kg 0.0157 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.9 pH 5.9 pH 5.9 pH PH

12naphthalene

0.19 mg/kg 0.133 mg/kg 0.0000133 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

0.16 mg/kg 0.112 mg/kg 0.0000112 % 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

0.22 mg/kg 0.154 mg/kg 0.0000154 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

0.25 mg/kg 0.175 mg/kg 0.0000175 % 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

2.3 mg/kg 1.61 mg/kg 0.000161 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

0.51 mg/kg 0.357 mg/kg 0.0000357 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

4.4 mg/kg 3.08 mg/kg 0.000308 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

3.8 mg/kg 2.66 mg/kg 0.000266 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


2 mg/kg 1.4 mg/kg 0.00014 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

2.1 mg/kg 1.47 mg/kg 0.000147 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


2.8 mg/kg 1.96 mg/kg 0.000196 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.94 mg/kg 0.658 mg/kg 0.0000658 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


2.1 mg/kg 1.47 mg/kg 0.000147 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


1.4 mg/kg 0.98 mg/kg 0.000098 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


0.21 mg/kg 0.147 mg/kg 0.0000147 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


1.2 mg/kg 0.84 mg/kg 0.000084 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


24 mg/kg 1.785 29.991 mg/kg 0.003 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0395 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.4 pH 6.4 pH 6.4 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



9.4 mg/kg 1.32 9.557 mg/kg 0.000956 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.55 mg/kg 3.22 1.364 mg/kg 0.000136 %005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.32 mg/kg 1.142 0.281 mg/kg 0.0000281 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


30 mg/kg 1.126 26.008 mg/kg 0.0026 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.13 mg/kg 1.353 0.135 mg/kg 0.0000135 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


22 mg/kg 1.273 21.558 mg/kg 0.00216 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


93 mg/kg 1.245 89.134 mg/kg 0.00891 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


33 mg/kg 25.41 mg/kg 0.00254 % TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6 pH 6 pH 6pH PH

20naphthalene

0.15 mg/kg 0.115 mg/kg 0.0000115 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

0.12 mg/kg 0.0924 mg/kg 0.00000924 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

1.1 mg/kg 0.847 mg/kg 0.0000847 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

0.24 mg/kg 0.185 mg/kg 0.0000185 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

1.9 mg/kg 1.463 mg/kg 0.000146 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

1.7 mg/kg 1.309 mg/kg 0.000131 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.76 mg/kg 0.585 mg/kg 0.0000585 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

0.77 mg/kg 0.593 mg/kg 0.0000593 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


1.1 mg/kg 0.847 mg/kg 0.0000847 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.36 mg/kg 0.277 mg/kg 0.0000277 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.82 mg/kg 0.631 mg/kg 0.0000631 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.54 mg/kg 0.416 mg/kg 0.0000416 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.52 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg 0.00004 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


23 mg/kg 1.785 31.616 mg/kg 0.00316 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0302 %



















Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



4.2 mg/kg 1.32 4.991 mg/kg 0.000499 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.4 mg/kg 3.22 <1.288 mg/kg <0.000129 % <LOD005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.2 mg/kg 1.142 0.206 mg/kg 0.0000206 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


14 mg/kg 1.126 14.186 mg/kg 0.00142 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1

7lead { lead compounds with the exception of thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex } 1 9.9 mg/kg 8.91 mg/kg 0.000891 %

082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


26 mg/kg 1.273 29.779 mg/kg 0.00298 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


36 mg/kg 1.245 40.329 mg/kg 0.00403 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

7 pH 7 pH 7pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


14 mg/kg 1.785 22.493 mg/kg 0.00225 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.016 %













Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



14 mg/kg 1.32 11.83 mg/kg 0.00118 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.12 mg/kg 1.142 0.0877 mg/kg 0.00000877 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


29 mg/kg 1.126 20.896 mg/kg 0.00209 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.34 mg/kg 1.353 0.295 mg/kg 0.0000295 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


9.9 mg/kg 1.273 8.063 mg/kg 0.000806 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


33 mg/kg 1.245 26.288 mg/kg 0.00263 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.1 pH 5.1 pH 5.1 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.72 mg/kg 0.461 mg/kg 0.0000461 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

0.15 mg/kg 0.096 mg/kg 0.0000096 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

1.6 mg/kg 1.024 mg/kg 0.000102 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

1.4 mg/kg 0.896 mg/kg 0.0000896 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.72 mg/kg 0.461 mg/kg 0.0000461 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.77 mg/kg 0.493 mg/kg 0.0000493 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


1.1 mg/kg 0.704 mg/kg 0.0000704 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.36 mg/kg 0.23 mg/kg 0.000023 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.87 mg/kg 0.557 mg/kg 0.0000557 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.63 mg/kg 0.403 mg/kg 0.0000403 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.55 mg/kg 0.352 mg/kg 0.0000352 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


23 mg/kg 1.785 26.278 mg/kg 0.00263 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0178 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.2 pH 6.2 pH 6.2 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



16 mg/kg 1.32 15.21 mg/kg 0.00152 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.2 mg/kg 1.142 0.164 mg/kg 0.0000164 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


34 mg/kg 1.126 27.562 mg/kg 0.00276 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.21 mg/kg 1.353 0.205 mg/kg 0.0000205 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


16 mg/kg 1.273 14.66 mg/kg 0.00147 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


46 mg/kg 1.245 41.225 mg/kg 0.00412 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

7.3 pH 7.3 pH 7.3 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.34 mg/kg 0.245 mg/kg 0.0000245 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

0.59 mg/kg 0.425 mg/kg 0.0000425 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.51 mg/kg 0.367 mg/kg 0.0000367 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.27 mg/kg 0.194 mg/kg 0.0000194 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.26 mg/kg 0.187 mg/kg 0.0000187 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.41 mg/kg 0.295 mg/kg 0.0000295 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.28 mg/kg 0.202 mg/kg 0.0000202 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.22 mg/kg 0.158 mg/kg 0.0000158 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.2 mg/kg 0.144 mg/kg 0.0000144 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


23 mg/kg 1.785 29.563 mg/kg 0.00296 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0207 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



3.5 mg/kg 1.32 4.02 mg/kg 0.000402 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.49 mg/kg 3.22 1.373 mg/kg 0.000137 %005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.37 mg/kg 1.142 0.368 mg/kg 0.0000368 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


20 mg/kg 1.126 19.59 mg/kg 0.00196 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


34 mg/kg 1.273 37.643 mg/kg 0.00376 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


59 mg/kg 1.245 63.891 mg/kg 0.00639 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6.3 pH 6.3 pH 6.3 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


15 mg/kg 1.785 23.297 mg/kg 0.00233 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.02 %













Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



17 mg/kg 1.32 15.487 mg/kg 0.00155 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.43 mg/kg 1.142 0.339 mg/kg 0.0000339 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


38 mg/kg 1.126 29.521 mg/kg 0.00295 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.25 mg/kg 1.353 0.233 mg/kg 0.0000233 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


18 mg/kg 1.273 15.806 mg/kg 0.00158 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


60 mg/kg 1.245 51.531 mg/kg 0.00515 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

7.5 pH 7.5 pH 7.5 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.69 mg/kg 0.476 mg/kg 0.0000476 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

0.11 mg/kg 0.0759 mg/kg 0.00000759 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

0.84 mg/kg 0.58 mg/kg 0.000058 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.73 mg/kg 0.504 mg/kg 0.0000504 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.35 mg/kg 0.242 mg/kg 0.0000242 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.35 mg/kg 0.242 mg/kg 0.0000242 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.58 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg 0.00004 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.19 mg/kg 0.131 mg/kg 0.0000131 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.44 mg/kg 0.304 mg/kg 0.0000304 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.27 mg/kg 0.186 mg/kg 0.0000186 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.28 mg/kg 0.193 mg/kg 0.0000193 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


26 mg/kg 1.785 32.026 mg/kg 0.0032 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0227 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.7 pH 6.7 pH 6.7 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



36 mg/kg 1.32 32.322 mg/kg 0.00323 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.45 mg/kg 1.142 0.35 mg/kg 0.000035 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


55 mg/kg 1.126 42.108 mg/kg 0.00421 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.37 mg/kg 1.353 0.341 mg/kg 0.0000341 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


23 mg/kg 1.273 19.903 mg/kg 0.00199 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


76 mg/kg 1.245 64.327 mg/kg 0.00643 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.6 pH 5.6 pH 5.6 pH PH

12naphthalene

1.2 mg/kg 0.816 mg/kg 0.0000816 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

3.6 mg/kg 2.448 mg/kg 0.000245 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

2.6 mg/kg 1.768 mg/kg 0.000177 % 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

21 mg/kg 14.28 mg/kg 0.00143 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

4.4 mg/kg 2.992 mg/kg 0.000299 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

22 mg/kg 14.96 mg/kg 0.0015 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

19 mg/kg 12.92 mg/kg 0.00129 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


8.2 mg/kg 5.576 mg/kg 0.000558 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

7.9 mg/kg 5.372 mg/kg 0.000537 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


9.4 mg/kg 6.392 mg/kg 0.000639 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


3.4 mg/kg 2.312 mg/kg 0.000231 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


8.5 mg/kg 5.78 mg/kg 0.000578 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


5 mg/kg 3.4 mg/kg 0.00034 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


0.89 mg/kg 0.605 mg/kg 0.0000605 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


4.3 mg/kg 2.924 mg/kg 0.000292 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


48 mg/kg 1.785 58.268 mg/kg 0.00583 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0445 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

5.6 pH 5.6 pH 5.6 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



8.7 mg/kg 1.32 7.352 mg/kg 0.000735 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.39 mg/kg 1.142 0.285 mg/kg 0.0000285 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


35 mg/kg 1.126 25.22 mg/kg 0.00252 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.25 mg/kg 1.353 0.217 mg/kg 0.0000217 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


13 mg/kg 1.273 10.588 mg/kg 0.00106 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


79 mg/kg 1.245 62.933 mg/kg 0.00629 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.4 pH 5.4 pH 5.4 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.56 mg/kg 0.358 mg/kg 0.0000358 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

0.12 mg/kg 0.0768 mg/kg 0.00000768 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

1.1 mg/kg 0.704 mg/kg 0.0000704 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.94 mg/kg 0.602 mg/kg 0.0000602 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.46 mg/kg 0.294 mg/kg 0.0000294 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.45 mg/kg 0.288 mg/kg 0.0000288 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.66 mg/kg 0.422 mg/kg 0.0000422 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.24 mg/kg 0.154 mg/kg 0.0000154 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.51 mg/kg 0.326 mg/kg 0.0000326 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.31 mg/kg 0.198 mg/kg 0.0000198 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.3 mg/kg 0.192 mg/kg 0.0000192 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


26 mg/kg 1.785 29.705 mg/kg 0.00297 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0224 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



9.4 mg/kg 1.32 8.936 mg/kg 0.000894 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.28 mg/kg 1.142 0.23 mg/kg 0.000023 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


20 mg/kg 1.126 16.213 mg/kg 0.00162 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.14 mg/kg 1.353 0.136 mg/kg 0.0000136 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


11 mg/kg 1.273 10.079 mg/kg 0.00101 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


110 mg/kg 1.245 98.581 mg/kg 0.00986 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.7 pH 5.7 pH 5.7 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.35 mg/kg 0.252 mg/kg 0.0000252 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

0.64 mg/kg 0.461 mg/kg 0.0000461 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.59 mg/kg 0.425 mg/kg 0.0000425 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.21 mg/kg 0.151 mg/kg 0.0000151 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.28 mg/kg 0.202 mg/kg 0.0000202 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.33 mg/kg 0.238 mg/kg 0.0000238 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.11 mg/kg 0.0792 mg/kg 0.00000792 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.27 mg/kg 0.194 mg/kg 0.0000194 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.2 mg/kg 0.144 mg/kg 0.0000144 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.17 mg/kg 0.122 mg/kg 0.0000122 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


23 mg/kg 1.785 29.563 mg/kg 0.00296 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.025 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.4 pH 6.4 pH 6.4 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



20 mg/kg 1.32 16.9 mg/kg 0.00169 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.43 mg/kg 1.142 0.314 mg/kg 0.0000314 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


29 mg/kg 1.126 20.896 mg/kg 0.00209 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1

6lead { lead compounds with the exception of thosespecified elsewhere in this Annex } 1 100 mg/kg 64 mg/kg 0.0064 %

082-001-00-6


0.28 mg/kg 1.353 0.243 mg/kg 0.0000243 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


14 mg/kg 1.273 11.402 mg/kg 0.00114 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9

selenium { selenium compounds with the exception ofcadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewherein this Annex } 1 mg/kg 2.554 1.634 mg/kg 0.000163 %

034-002-00-8


59 mg/kg 1.245 47 mg/kg 0.0047 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.8 pH 5.8 pH 5.8 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.53 mg/kg 0.339 mg/kg 0.0000339 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

0.12 mg/kg 0.0768 mg/kg 0.00000768 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

0.96 mg/kg 0.614 mg/kg 0.0000614 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.85 mg/kg 0.544 mg/kg 0.0000544 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.44 mg/kg 0.282 mg/kg 0.0000282 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.41 mg/kg 0.262 mg/kg 0.0000262 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.51 mg/kg 0.326 mg/kg 0.0000326 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.17 mg/kg 0.109 mg/kg 0.0000109 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.47 mg/kg 0.301 mg/kg 0.0000301 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.33 mg/kg 0.211 mg/kg 0.0000211 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.28 mg/kg 0.179 mg/kg 0.0000179 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


36 mg/kg 1.785 41.131 mg/kg 0.00411 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0231 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.4 pH 6.4 pH 6.4 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



14 mg/kg 1.32 13.124 mg/kg 0.00131 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.4 mg/kg 3.22 <1.288 mg/kg <0.000129 % <LOD005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.29 mg/kg 1.142 0.235 mg/kg 0.0000235 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


23 mg/kg 1.126 18.386 mg/kg 0.00184 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.15 mg/kg 1.353 0.144 mg/kg 0.0000144 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


14 mg/kg 1.273 12.65 mg/kg 0.00126 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


48 mg/kg 1.245 42.42 mg/kg 0.00424 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


88 mg/kg 62.48 mg/kg 0.00625 % TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


0.6 mg/kg 1.884 0.803 mg/kg 0.0000803 %

006-007-00-5

19pH

5.8 pH 5.8 pH 5.8 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

0.42 mg/kg 0.298 mg/kg 0.0000298 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

0.67 mg/kg 0.476 mg/kg 0.0000476 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

0.54 mg/kg 0.383 mg/kg 0.0000383 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.28 mg/kg 0.199 mg/kg 0.0000199 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

0.28 mg/kg 0.199 mg/kg 0.0000199 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.39 mg/kg 0.277 mg/kg 0.0000277 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


0.11 mg/kg 0.0781 mg/kg 0.00000781 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.27 mg/kg 0.192 mg/kg 0.0000192 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.2 mg/kg 0.142 mg/kg 0.0000142 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.17 mg/kg 0.121 mg/kg 0.0000121 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


29 mg/kg 1.785 36.757 mg/kg 0.00368 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.027 %



















Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



9.8 mg/kg 1.32 8.799 mg/kg 0.00088 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.32 mg/kg 1.142 0.249 mg/kg 0.0000249 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


21 mg/kg 1.126 16.078 mg/kg 0.00161 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.12 mg/kg 1.353 0.11 mg/kg 0.000011 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


14 mg/kg 1.273 12.115 mg/kg 0.00121 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


70 mg/kg 1.245 59.248 mg/kg 0.00592 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.3 pH 6.3 pH 6.3 pH PH

12naphthalene

0.19 mg/kg 0.129 mg/kg 0.0000129 %601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

0.89 mg/kg 0.605 mg/kg 0.0000605 % 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

0.5 mg/kg 0.34 mg/kg 0.000034 % 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

0.98 mg/kg 0.666 mg/kg 0.0000666 % 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

10 mg/kg 6.8 mg/kg 0.00068 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

3.4 mg/kg 2.312 mg/kg 0.000231 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

15 mg/kg 10.2 mg/kg 0.00102 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

12 mg/kg 8.16 mg/kg 0.000816 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


6.3 mg/kg 4.284 mg/kg 0.000428 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

5.6 mg/kg 3.808 mg/kg 0.000381 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


6.7 mg/kg 4.556 mg/kg 0.000456 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


2.3 mg/kg 1.564 mg/kg 0.000156 %601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


5.6 mg/kg 3.808 mg/kg 0.000381 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


3.3 mg/kg 2.244 mg/kg 0.000224 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


0.61 mg/kg 0.415 mg/kg 0.0000415 %601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


2.7 mg/kg 1.836 mg/kg 0.000184 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


21 mg/kg 1.785 25.492 mg/kg 0.00255 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0256 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.1 pH 6.1 pH 6.1 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



16 mg/kg 1.32 16.266 mg/kg 0.00163 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.65 mg/kg 3.22 1.612 mg/kg 0.000161 %005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.22 mg/kg 1.142 0.194 mg/kg 0.0000194 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


29 mg/kg 1.126 25.141 mg/kg 0.00251 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.13 mg/kg 1.353 0.135 mg/kg 0.0000135 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


21 mg/kg 1.273 20.578 mg/kg 0.00206 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


59 mg/kg 1.245 56.547 mg/kg 0.00565 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

5.5 pH 5.5 pH 5.5 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

0.3 mg/kg 0.231 mg/kg 0.0000231 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

0.32 mg/kg 0.246 mg/kg 0.0000246 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

0.31 mg/kg 0.239 mg/kg 0.0000239 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.14 mg/kg 0.108 mg/kg 0.0000108 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

0.17 mg/kg 0.131 mg/kg 0.0000131 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.2 mg/kg 0.154 mg/kg 0.0000154 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.15 mg/kg 0.115 mg/kg 0.0000115 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


47 mg/kg 1.785 64.606 mg/kg 0.00646 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0292 %













Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



3.3 mg/kg 1.32 3.529 mg/kg 0.000353 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.4 mg/kg 3.22 <1.288 mg/kg <0.000129 % <LOD005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


18 mg/kg 1.126 16.415 mg/kg 0.00164 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


33 mg/kg 1.273 34.016 mg/kg 0.0034 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


51 mg/kg 1.245 51.419 mg/kg 0.00514 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6.4 pH 6.4 pH 6.4 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


32 mg/kg 1.785 46.272 mg/kg 0.00463 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0222 %













Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



21 mg/kg 1.32 20.518 mg/kg 0.00205 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.27 mg/kg 1.142 0.228 mg/kg 0.0000228 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


36 mg/kg 1.126 29.994 mg/kg 0.003 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.2 mg/kg 1.353 0.2 mg/kg 0.00002 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


20 mg/kg 1.273 18.834 mg/kg 0.00188 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


58 mg/kg 1.245 53.423 mg/kg 0.00534 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.6 pH 5.6 pH 5.6 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.47 mg/kg 0.348 mg/kg 0.0000348 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

0.45 mg/kg 0.333 mg/kg 0.0000333 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.41 mg/kg 0.303 mg/kg 0.0000303 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.19 mg/kg 0.141 mg/kg 0.0000141 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.21 mg/kg 0.155 mg/kg 0.0000155 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


0.28 mg/kg 0.207 mg/kg 0.0000207 %601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


0.19 mg/kg 0.141 mg/kg 0.0000141 %601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


0.11 mg/kg 0.0814 mg/kg 0.00000814 % 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


0.13 mg/kg 0.0962 mg/kg 0.00000962 % 205-883-8 191-24-2


50 mg/kg 1.785 66.052 mg/kg 0.00661 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0276 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

6.1 pH 6.1 pH 6.1 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



5.8 mg/kg 1.32 5.59 mg/kg 0.000559 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.26 mg/kg 1.142 0.217 mg/kg 0.0000217 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


65 mg/kg 1.126 53.423 mg/kg 0.00534 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


45 mg/kg 1.273 41.805 mg/kg 0.00418 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


63 mg/kg 1.245 57.244 mg/kg 0.00572 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.2 pH 6.2 pH 6.2 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


35 mg/kg 1.785 45.611 mg/kg 0.00456 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0273 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



17 mg/kg 1.32 19.977 mg/kg 0.002 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.4 mg/kg 3.22 <1.288 mg/kg <0.000129 % <LOD005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


1.1 mg/kg 1.142 1.118 mg/kg 0.000112 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


82 mg/kg 1.126 82.167 mg/kg 0.00822 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


44 mg/kg 1.273 49.835 mg/kg 0.00498 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


73 mg/kg 1.245 80.869 mg/kg 0.00809 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6.9 pH 6.9 pH 6.9 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

0.58 mg/kg 0.516 mg/kg 0.0000516 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

0.17 mg/kg 0.151 mg/kg 0.0000151 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

0.21 mg/kg 0.187 mg/kg 0.0000187 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


22 mg/kg 1.785 34.954 mg/kg 0.0035 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0349 %













Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



15 mg/kg 1.32 16.636 mg/kg 0.00166 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.14 mg/kg 1.142 0.134 mg/kg 0.0000134 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


34 mg/kg 1.126 32.155 mg/kg 0.00322 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.16 mg/kg 1.353 0.182 mg/kg 0.0000182 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


23 mg/kg 1.273 24.586 mg/kg 0.00246 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


46 mg/kg 1.245 48.096 mg/kg 0.00481 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.8 pH 5.8 pH 5.8 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


40 mg/kg 1.785 59.982 mg/kg 0.006 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0263 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



3.4 mg/kg 1.32 3.322 mg/kg 0.000332 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.21 mg/kg 1.142 0.178 mg/kg 0.0000178 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


27 mg/kg 1.126 22.495 mg/kg 0.00225 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


47 mg/kg 1.273 44.261 mg/kg 0.00443 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


69 mg/kg 1.245 63.555 mg/kg 0.00636 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.4 pH 5.4 pH 5.4 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


35 mg/kg 1.785 46.236 mg/kg 0.00462 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0259 %








Classification of sample: WS109 d1-888536-11/09/2019-0.0



Sample details

Sample Name:WS109 d1-888536-11/09/2019-0.0Sample Depth:0.0-0.2 mMoisture content:31%(wet weight correction)



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



24 mg/kg 1.32 21.865 mg/kg 0.00219 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.56 mg/kg 1.142 0.441 mg/kg 0.0000441 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


64 mg/kg 1.126 49.719 mg/kg 0.00497 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.19 mg/kg 1.353 0.177 mg/kg 0.0000177 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


34 mg/kg 1.273 29.855 mg/kg 0.00299 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


270 mg/kg 1.245 231.89 mg/kg 0.0232 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

7.2 pH 7.2 pH 7.2 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.75 mg/kg 0.518 mg/kg 0.0000518 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

1.1 mg/kg 0.759 mg/kg 0.0000759 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

1 mg/kg 0.69 mg/kg 0.000069 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.24 mg/kg 0.166 mg/kg 0.0000166 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.27 mg/kg 0.186 mg/kg 0.0000186 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


34 mg/kg 1.785 41.88 mg/kg 0.00419 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0709 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



4.1 mg/kg 1.32 4.168 mg/kg 0.000417 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.4 mg/kg 3.22 <1.288 mg/kg <0.000129 % <LOD005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


7.7 mg/kg 1.126 6.675 mg/kg 0.000668 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


17 mg/kg 1.273 16.658 mg/kg 0.00167 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


40 mg/kg 1.245 38.337 mg/kg 0.00383 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

7.5 pH 7.5 pH 7.5 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


24 mg/kg 1.785 32.99 mg/kg 0.0033 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0156 %













Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



5.1 mg/kg 1.32 4.916 mg/kg 0.000492 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.17 mg/kg 1.142 0.142 mg/kg 0.0000142 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


9.5 mg/kg 1.126 7.808 mg/kg 0.000781 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


13 mg/kg 1.273 12.077 mg/kg 0.00121 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


34 mg/kg 1.245 30.894 mg/kg 0.00309 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.2 pH 6.2 pH 6.2 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


28 mg/kg 1.785 36.489 mg/kg 0.00365 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0145 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


1pH

5.8 pH 5.8 pH 5.8 pH PH

Total: 0%








Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



16 mg/kg 1.32 14.154 mg/kg 0.00142 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.44 mg/kg 3.22 0.949 mg/kg 0.0000949 %005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.17 mg/kg 1.142 0.13 mg/kg 0.000013 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


24 mg/kg 1.126 18.104 mg/kg 0.00181 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.15 mg/kg 1.353 0.136 mg/kg 0.0000136 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


17 mg/kg 1.273 14.495 mg/kg 0.00145 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


52 mg/kg 1.245 43.366 mg/kg 0.00434 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


190 mg/kg 127.3 mg/kg 0.0127 % TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

5.7 pH 5.7 pH 5.7 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

0.38 mg/kg 0.255 mg/kg 0.0000255 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

0.73 mg/kg 0.489 mg/kg 0.0000489 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

0.65 mg/kg 0.436 mg/kg 0.0000436 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


36 mg/kg 1.785 43.059 mg/kg 0.00431 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0345 %



















Sample details

Sample Name:WS111 d2-888541-11/09/2019-0.3Sample Depth:0.3-1.0 mMoisture content:9.4%(wet weight correction)



03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



1.8 mg/kg 1.32 2.153 mg/kg 0.000215 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


<0.1 mg/kg 1.142 <0.114 mg/kg <0.0000114 % <LOD048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


15 mg/kg 1.126 15.301 mg/kg 0.00153 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


33 mg/kg 1.273 38.048 mg/kg 0.0038 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


59 mg/kg 1.245 66.535 mg/kg 0.00665 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

6.4 pH 6.4 pH 6.4 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


28 mg/kg 1.785 45.287 mg/kg 0.00453 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0228 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



24 mg/kg 1.32 22.815 mg/kg 0.00228 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.47 mg/kg 3.22 1.09 mg/kg 0.000109 %005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.27 mg/kg 1.142 0.222 mg/kg 0.0000222 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


50 mg/kg 1.126 40.532 mg/kg 0.00405 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.18 mg/kg 1.353 0.175 mg/kg 0.0000175 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


29 mg/kg 1.273 26.572 mg/kg 0.00266 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


100 mg/kg 1.245 89.619 mg/kg 0.00896 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


140 mg/kg 100.8 mg/kg 0.0101 % TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6.5 pH 6.5 pH 6.5 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

1 mg/kg 0.72 mg/kg 0.000072 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

0.19 mg/kg 0.137 mg/kg 0.0000137 % 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

1.5 mg/kg 1.08 mg/kg 0.000108 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

1.4 mg/kg 1.008 mg/kg 0.000101 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


43 mg/kg 1.785 55.269 mg/kg 0.00553 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0474 %



















Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



17 mg/kg 1.32 15.936 mg/kg 0.00159 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.44 mg/kg 3.22 1.006 mg/kg 0.000101 %005-008-00-8 215-125-8 1303-86-2


0.15 mg/kg 1.142 0.122 mg/kg 0.0000122 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


63 mg/kg 1.126 50.361 mg/kg 0.00504 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

9


31 mg/kg 1.273 28.01 mg/kg 0.0028 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

10


034-002-00-8


71 mg/kg 1.245 62.746 mg/kg 0.00627 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2


<10 mg/kg <10 mg/kg <0.001 % <LOD TPH



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



603-181-00-X 216-653-1 1634-04-4

14benzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-020-00-8 200-753-7 71-43-2

15toluene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-021-00-3 203-625-9 108-88-3

16ethylbenzene

<0.001 mg/kg <0.001 mg/kg <0.0000001 % <LOD601-023-00-4 202-849-4 100-41-4

17

xylene

<0.002 mg/kg <0.002 mg/kg <0.0000002 % <LOD601-022-00-9 202-422-2 [1]

203-396-5 [2]203-576-3 [3]215-535-7 [4]

95-47-6 [1]106-42-3 [2]108-38-3 [3]1330-20-7 [4]

18


<0.5 mg/kg 1.884 <0.942 mg/kg <0.0000942 % <LOD

006-007-00-5

19pH

6.5 pH 6.5 pH 6.5 pH PH

20naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3

21acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

22acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

23fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

24phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

25anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

26fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

27pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

29chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


28 mg/kg 1.785 35.489 mg/kg 0.00355 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0264 %













Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



22 mg/kg 1.32 20.623 mg/kg 0.00206 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.5 mg/kg 1.142 0.406 mg/kg 0.0000406 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


37 mg/kg 1.126 29.577 mg/kg 0.00296 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


0.22 mg/kg 1.353 0.211 mg/kg 0.0000211 %080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


27 mg/kg 1.273 24.396 mg/kg 0.00244 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


84 mg/kg 1.245 74.235 mg/kg 0.00742 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

5.9 pH 5.9 pH 5.9 pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

0.39 mg/kg 0.277 mg/kg 0.0000277 % 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

0.58 mg/kg 0.412 mg/kg 0.0000412 % 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

0.57 mg/kg 0.405 mg/kg 0.0000405 % 204-927-3 129-00-0


0.19 mg/kg 0.135 mg/kg 0.0000135 %601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

0.19 mg/kg 0.135 mg/kg 0.0000135 %601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


50 mg/kg 1.785 63.374 mg/kg 0.00634 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0345 %











Sample details




03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands


#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed



3.3 mg/kg 1.32 3.268 mg/kg 0.000327 %033-003-00-0 215-481-4 1327-53-3


0.2 mg/kg 1.142 0.171 mg/kg 0.0000171 %048-002-00-0 215-146-2 1306-19-0


215-160-9 1308-38-9


024-001-00-0 215-607-8 1333-82-0


24 mg/kg 1.126 20.266 mg/kg 0.00203 %029-002-00-X 215-270-7 1317-39-1


082-001-00-6


<0.1 mg/kg 1.353 <0.135 mg/kg <0.0000135 % <LOD080-010-00-X 231-299-8 7487-94-7

8


47 mg/kg 1.273 44.859 mg/kg 0.00449 %028-003-00-2 215-215-7 [1]234-323-5 [2] - [3]

1313-99-1 [1]11099-02-8 [2]34492-97-2 [3]

9


034-002-00-8


76 mg/kg 1.245 70.949 mg/kg 0.00709 %030-013-00-7 215-222-5 1314-13-2

11pH

7 pH 7 pH 7pH PH

12naphthalene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-052-00-2 202-049-5 91-20-3



#Determinand

CLP

Not

e



value

MC

App

lied

Conc. NotUsed


13acenaphthylene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-917-1 208-96-8

14acenaphthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-469-6 83-32-9

15fluorene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-695-5 86-73-7

16phenanthrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 201-581-5 85-01-8

17anthracene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-371-1 120-12-7

18fluoranthene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-912-4 206-44-0

19pyrene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 204-927-3 129-00-0


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-033-00-9 200-280-6 56-55-3

21chrysene

<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-048-00-0 205-923-4 218-01-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-034-00-4 205-911-9 205-99-2


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-036-00-5 205-916-6 207-08-9


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-032-00-3 200-028-5 50-32-8


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-893-2 193-39-5


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD601-041-00-2 200-181-8 53-70-3


<0.1 mg/kg <0.1 mg/kg <0.00001 % <LOD 205-883-8 191-24-2


41 mg/kg 1.785 54.894 mg/kg 0.00549 %023-001-00-8 215-239-8 1314-62-1

Total: 0.0275 %








Appendix A: Classifier defined and non CLP determinands

chromium(III) oxide (EC Number: 215-160-9, CAS Number: 1308-38-9)

Conversion factor: 1.462Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Repr. 1B H360FD , Skin Sens. 1 H317 , Resp. Sens. 1 H334 ,Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Acute Tox. 4 H302 , Acute Tox. 4 H332

lead compounds with the exception of those specified elsewhere in this Annex

CLP index number: 082-001-00-6Description/Comments: Least-worst case: Lead REACH Consortium considers some lead compounds Carcinogenic category 2BData source: Regulation 1272/2008/EC - Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. (CLP)Additional Hazard Statement(s): Carc. 2 H351Reason for additional Hazards Statement(s)/Risk Phrase(s):03 Jun 2015 - Carc. 2 H351 hazard statement sourced from: IARC Group 2A (Sup 7, 87) 2006; Lead REACH Consortiumwww.reach-lead.eu/substanceinformation.html. Review date 29/09/2015

pH (CAS Number: PH)

Description/Comments: Appendix C4Data source: WM3 1st Edition 2015Data source date: 25 May 2015Hazard Statements: None.

acenaphthylene (EC Number: 205-917-1, CAS Number: 208-96-8)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Acute Tox. 1 H310 , Acute Tox. 1 H330 , Acute Tox. 4 H302

acenaphthene (EC Number: 201-469-6, CAS Number: 83-32-9)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 2 H411 , Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 ,Eye Irrit. 2 H319

fluorene (EC Number: 201-695-5, CAS Number: 86-73-7)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 06 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400

phenanthrene (EC Number: 201-581-5, CAS Number: 85-01-8)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 06 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Skin Sens. 1 H317 , Carc. 2 H351 , STOT SE 3H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Acute Tox. 4 H302

anthracene (EC Number: 204-371-1, CAS Number: 120-12-7)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 17 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Skin Sens. 1 H317 , Skin Irrit. 2 H315 , STOT SE 3 H335 , EyeIrrit. 2 H319

fluoranthene (EC Number: 205-912-4, CAS Number: 206-44-0)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 21 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , Acute Tox. 4 H302



pyrene (EC Number: 204-927-3, CAS Number: 129-00-0)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory Database; SDS Sigma Aldrich 2014Data source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 21 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400 , STOT SE 3 H335 , Eye Irrit. 2 H319 , Skin Irrit. 2 H315

indeno[123-cd]pyrene (EC Number: 205-893-2, CAS Number: 193-39-5)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory DatabaseData source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 06 Aug 2015Hazard Statements: Carc. 2 H351

benzo[ghi]perylene (EC Number: 205-883-8, CAS Number: 191-24-2)

Description/Comments: Data from C&L Inventory Database; SDS Sigma Aldrich 28/02/2015Data source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-databaseData source date: 23 Jul 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 1 H410 , Aquatic Acute 1 H400

TPH (C6 to C40) petroleum group (CAS Number: TPH)

Description/Comments: Hazard statements taken from WM3 1st Edition 2015; Risk phrases: WM2 3rd Edition 2013Data source: WM3 1st Edition 2015Data source date: 25 May 2015Hazard Statements: Aquatic Chronic 2 H411 , Repr. 2 H361d , Carc. 1B H350 , Muta. 1B H340 , STOT RE 2 H373 , Asp. Tox. 1 H304 ,Flam. Liq. 3 H226

ethylbenzene (EC Number: 202-849-4, CAS Number: 100-41-4)

CLP index number: 601-023-00-4Description/Comments:Data source: Commission Regulation (EU) No 605/2014 – 6th Adaptation to Technical Progress for Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.(ATP6)Additional Hazard Statement(s): Carc. 2 H351Reason for additional Hazards Statement(s)/Risk Phrase(s):03 Jun 2015 - Carc. 2 H351 hazard statement sourced from: IARC Group 2B (77) 2000

salts of hydrogen cyanide with the exception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides, ferricyanides and mercuricoxycyanide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex

CLP index number: 006-007-00-5Description/Comments: Conversion factor based on a worst case compound: sodium cyanideData source: Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 - 1st Adaptation to Technical Progress for Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.(ATP1)Additional Hazard Statement(s): EUH032 >= 0.2 %Reason for additional Hazards Statement(s)/Risk Phrase(s):14 Dec 2015 - EUH032 >= 0.2 % hazard statement sourced from: WM3, Table C12.2

Appendix B: Rationale for selection of metal species

arsenic {arsenic trioxide}

Reasonable case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight and most common (stable) oxide of arsenic. Industrialsources include: smelting; main precursor to other arsenic compounds (edit as required)

cadmium {cadmium oxide}

Reasonable case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight, very low solubility in water. Industrial sources include:electroplating baths, electrodes for storage batteries, catalysts, ceramic glazes, phosphors, pigments and nematocides. (edit asrequired) Worst case compounds in CLP: cadmium sulphate, chloride, fluoride & iodide not expected as either very soluble and/orcompound's industrial usage not related to site history (edit as required)

chromium in chromium(III) compounds {chromium(III) oxide}

Reasonable case species based on hazard statements/molecular weight. Industrial sources include: tanning, pigment in paint, inks andglass (edit as required)

chromium in chromium(VI) compounds {chromium(VI) oxide}

Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight. Industrial sources include: production stainless steel,electroplating, wood preservation, anti-corrosion agents or coatings, pigments (edit as required)



copper {dicopper oxide; copper (I) oxide}

Reasonable case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight and insolubility in water. Industrial sources include:oxidised copper metal, brake pads, pigments, antifouling paints, fungicide. (edit as required) Worse case copper sulphate is very solubleand likely to have been leached away if ever present and/or not enough soluble sulphate detected. (edit as required)

lead {lead compounds with the exception of those specified elsewhere in this Annex}

Worst case compound based on absence of CrVI and assumed lead oxide from a combustion, ash based source.

mercury {mercury dichloride}

Worst case CLP species based on hazard statements/molecular weight (edit as required)

nickel {nickel(II) oxide (nickel monoxide)}

Worst case compound based on absence of CrVI and assumed oxide from a combustion, ash based source.

selenium {selenium compounds with the exception of cadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex}

Harmonised group entry used as most reasonable case. Pigment cadmium sulphoselenide not likely to be present in this soil. Noevidence for the other CLP entries: sodium selenite, nickel II selenite and nickel selenide, to be present in this soil. (edit as required)

zinc {zinc oxide}

Worst case compound based on absence of CrVI and assumed zinc oxide from a combustion, ash based source.

vanadium {divanadium pentaoxide; vanadium pentoxide}

worst case/most likely scenario

boron {diboron trioxide; boric oxide}

Reasonable case CLP species based on hazard statements/ molecular weight, physical form and low solubility. Industrial sourcesinclude: fluxing agent for glass/enamels; additive for fibre optics, borosilicate glass (edit as required)

cyanides {salts of hydrogen cyanide with the exception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides, ferricyanides andmercuric oxycyanide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex}

Harmonised group entry used as most reasonable case as complex cyanides and those specified elsewhere in the annex are not likelyto be present in this soil: [Note conversion factor based on a worst case compound: sodium cyanide] (edit as required)

Appendix C: Version

HazWasteOnline Classification Engine: WM3 1st Edition v1.1, May 2018HazWasteOnline Classification Engine Version: 2019.256.4006.8076 (13 Sep 2019)HazWasteOnline Database: 2019.256.4006.8076 (13 Sep 2019)

This classification utilises the following guidance and legislation:WM3 v1.1 - Waste Classification - 1st Edition v1.1 - May 2018CLP Regulation - Regulation 1272/2008/EC of 16 December 20081st ATP - Regulation 790/2009/EC of 10 August 20092nd ATP - Regulation 286/2011/EC of 10 March 20113rd ATP - Regulation 618/2012/EU of 10 July 20124th ATP - Regulation 487/2013/EU of 8 May 2013Correction to 1st ATP - Regulation 758/2013/EU of 7 August 20135th ATP - Regulation 944/2013/EU of 2 October 20136th ATP - Regulation 605/2014/EU of 5 June 2014WFD Annex III replacement - Regulation 1357/2014/EU of 18 December 2014Revised List of Wastes 2014 - Decision 2014/955/EU of 18 December 20147th ATP - Regulation 2015/1221/EU of 24 July 20158th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2016/918 of 19 May 20169th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2016/1179 of 19 July 201610th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2017/776 of 4 May 2017HP14 amendment - Regulation (EU) 2017/997 of 8 June 201713th ATP - Regulation (EU) 2018/1480 of 4 October 2018POPs Regulation 2004 - Regulation 850/2004/EC of 29 April 20041st ATP to POPs Regulation - Regulation 756/2010/EU of 24 August 20102nd ATP to POPs Regulation - Regulation 757/2010/EU of 24 August 2010

Geotechnical Contaminated Land Flood Risk and Drainage Asbestos Invasive Species Land Remediation Project Management Land Drilling

Based across the UK with offices in Manchester, London, Liverpool and Glasgow.

Manchester (Head Office) Unit 29, Eton Business Park Eton Hill Rd, Radcliffe M26 2ZS

t: 0161 763 7200 e: [email protected]

London 2 Falcon Gate Welwyn Garden City Hertfordshire

t:

AL7 1TW

01707 909059 e: [email protected]

Glasgow Wright Business Centre 1 Lonmay Road Glasgow G33 4EL


Liverpool The Corn Exchange Fenwick Street Liverpool L2 7QL
