26
PARAMETRIC CYCLE ANALYSIS OF TURBOFAN ENGINES PROPULSI PESAWAT TERBANG AE 3212 AGUSTINUS DIMAS 13608039 FAKULTAS TEKNIK MESIN DAN DIRGANTARA JURUSAN AERONOTIKA & ASTRONOTIKA INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG

Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Assignment of propulsion system lecturer about analysis of turbofan engines

Citation preview

Page 1: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

PARAMETRIC CYCLE ANALYSIS OF TURBOFAN ENGINES

PROPULSI PESAWAT TERBANG

AE 3212

AGUSTINUS DIMAS 13608039

FAKULTAS TEKNIK MESIN DAN DIRGANTARA

JURUSAN AERONOTIKA & ASTRONOTIKA

INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG

2011

Page 2: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

INPUTS : M0, T0, γ, CP, hPR, Tt4, πc, πf, α

OUTPUTS : F/ṁ0, f, S, ηT, ηP, ηO, FR

EQUATIONS :

R= γ−1γ

Cp

a0=√γR gc T 0

τ r=1+γ−12

M 02

τ λ=T t 4

T 0

τ c=( πc )(γ−1)

γ

τ f=( π f )( γ−1 )

γ

V 9

a0=√ 2

γ−1 {τ λ−τ r [τc−1+α (τ f−1 ) ]−τ λ

τ r τ c}

V 19

a0=√ 2

γ−1( τ λ τ f −1 )

Specific Thrust

Fm0

=a0gc

11+α [ V 9

a0−M 0+α(V 19

a0−M 0)]

Fuel/air Ratio

f =Cp T 0

hPR(τ λ−τ r τ c )

Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption

S= f

(1+α )( Fm0

)Thermal Efficiency

ηT=1−1

τ r τ c

Page 3: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

Propulsive Efficiency

ηP=2M 0

V 9

a0−M 0+α(V 19

a0−M 0)

V 92

a02−M 0

2+α(V 192

a02 −M 0

2)Overall Efficiency

ηo=ηT ηP

Thrust Ratio

FR=

V 9

a0−M 0

V 19

a0−M 0

Page 4: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 5 10 15 20 25 30100

200

300

400

500

600

700

specific thrust

0.511.52345812

πc

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 1 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

0 5 10 15 20 25 3012

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

thrust specific fuel consumption

0.511.52345812

πc

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 2 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

Page 5: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 5 10 15 20 25 300.022

0.024

0.026

0.028

0.030

0.032

fuel/air ratio

f

πc

f

Gambar 3 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: fuel/air ratio

0 5 10 15 20 25 3020

30

40

50

60

70

thermal efficiency

ηT

πc

ηT

Gambar 4 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: thermal efficiency

Page 6: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 5 10 15 20 25 3020

30

40

50

60

70

80

propulsive and overall efficiencies

0.5 11.5 23 45 812 0.51 1.52 34 58 12

πc

ηP(%)η0

Gambar 5 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: propulsive and overall efficiencies

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

1

2

3

4

5

6

specific thrust

0.511.52345812

πc

FR

Gambar 6 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for πf =2 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio

Page 7: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 5 10 15 20 25 30160.00

180.00

200.00

220.00

240.00

260.00

280.00

300.00

specific thrust

1.21.5233.544.5

πc

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 7 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

0 5 10 15 20 25 3012

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

thrust specific fuel consumption

1.21.5233.544.5

πc

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 8 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

Page 8: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 5 10 15 20 25 3045

50

55

60

65

70

75

propulsive efficiency

1.5233.544.5

πc

ηP(%)

Gambar 9 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: propulsive efficiency

0 5 10 15 20 25 3015

20

25

30

35

40

45

overall efficiency

1.21.5233.544.5

πc

η0(%)

Gambar 10 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: overall efficiency

Page 9: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

2

4

6

8

10

thrust ratio

1.21.5233.544.5

πc

FR

Gambar 11 Ideal turbofan performance versus πc, for α=5 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio

Page 10: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

1 2 3 4 5 650

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

specific thrust

3456781012

πc

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 12 Ideal turbofan performance versus πf, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

1 2 3 4 5 610

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

thrust specific fuel consumption

3456781012

πc

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 13 Ideal turbofan performance versus πf, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

Page 11: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

1 2 3 4 5 640

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

propulsive efficiency

3456781012

πc

ηP(%)

Gambar 14 Ideal turbofan performance versus πf, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: propulsive efficiency

1 2 3 4 5 60

1

2

3

4

5

thrust ratio

3456781012

πc

FR

Gambar 15 Ideal turbofan performance versus πf, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio

Page 12: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 2 4 6 8 10 12100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

specific thrust

1.522.533.544.5

πc

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 16 Ideal turbofan performance versus α, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: specific thrust

0 2 4 6 8 10 1212.00

14.00

16.00

18.00

20.00

22.00

thrust specific fuel consumption

1.522.533.544.5

πc

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 17 Ideal turbofan performance versus α, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

Page 13: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 2 4 6 8 10 1230

40

50

60

70

80

propulsive efficiency

1.522.533.544.5

πc

ηP(%)

Gambar 18 Ideal turbofan performance versus α, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: propulsive efficiency

0 2 4 6 8 10 120

1

2

3

4

5

thrust ratio

1.522.533.544.5

πc

FR

Gambar 19 Ideal turbofan performance versus α, for πc =24 and M0=0.9: thrust ratio

Page 14: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30.00

100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

700.00

800.00

specific thrust

0.5125810

M0

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 20 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: specific thrust

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 35.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

thrust specific fuel consumption

0.5125810

M0

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 21 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: thrust specific fuel consumption

Page 15: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

20

40

60

80

100

propulsive efficiencies

0.5125810ηT

M0

ηP(%)

Gambar 22 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: propulsive efficiency

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

overall efficiency

0.5125810

M0

η0(%)

Gambar 23 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: overall efficiency

Page 16: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

1

2

3

4

5

6

thrust ratio

0.5125810

M0

FR

Gambar 24 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =2: thrust ratio

Page 17: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30.00

200.00

400.00

600.00

800.00

1000.00

1200.00

specific thrust

00.20.5125

M0

F/ṁ0

[N/(k

g/se

c)]

Gambar 25 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: specific thrust

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 35.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

thrust specific fuel consumption

00.20.5125

M0

S[mg/

(N.se

c)]

Gambar 26 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: thrust specific fuel consumption

Page 18: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

20

40

60

80

100

propulsive efficiencies

00.20.5125ηT

M0

ηP(%)

Gambar 27 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: propulsive efficiency

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

overall efficiency

00.20.5125

M0

η0(%)

Gambar 28 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: overall efficiency

Page 19: Parametric Cycle Analysis of Turbofan Engines

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

thrust ratio

00.20.5125

M0

FR

Gambar 29 Ideal turbofan performance versus M0, for πc =24 and πf =3: thrust ratio