PARCC RESULTS: SPRING 2016 AND ... - Summit Public Schools · SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017 COHORT ANALYSIS MATHEMATICS *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I

Measuring College and Career Readiness

PARCC RESULTS:SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017

ADMINISTRATIONS

SUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLSSeptember 14, 2017

1

◼2017 marks the 3rd administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the second year for similar assessments to be given.

◼The following slides will compare year two and three results.

◼Assessments Administered:▪PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11.▪PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

2

◼Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations

◼Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations

◼Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations

◼Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations

◼Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS

3

Students Tested out of Total EnrollmentGrade Level Year to Year

Change2016 2017

Grade3 327/333=98% 312/321=97% -1%Grade4 311/324=96% 326/332=98% +2%Grade5 273/294=89% 317/323=98% +9%Grade6 296/306=97% 272/290=94% -3%Grade7 289/314=92% 295/315=94% +2%Grade8 293/321=91% 291/322=90% -1%Grade9 295/315=94% 283/290=98% +4%Grade10 253/311=81% 223/311=72% -9%Grade11* 197/342=58% 121/307=39% -19%

STUDENTS TESTED ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy. 4

Students Tested out of Total Enrollment Grade Level Year to Year

Change2016 2017

Grade 3 329/333=99% 312/321= 97% -2%Grade 4 318/324=98% 331/332=99% +1%Grade 5 276/294=94% 320/323=99% +5%Grade 6 300/305=98% 274/290=94% -4%Grade 7 295/317=93% 296/315=94% +1%Grade 8* 156/170=92% 167/188= 89% -3%Algebra I (Gr. 8)* 138/143=97% 127/134=95% -2%Algebra I (HS) 159/215=80% 157/186= 84% +4%Geometry 205/325=63% 215/298= 72% +9%Algebra II 160/336=48% 152/294=52% +4%

STUDENTS TESTEDMATHEMATICS

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.

Notes: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics.

5

6

STUDENT REFUSALS

2016-2017RefusalsGrade3 8Grade4 4Grade5 2

ELA MATHGrade6 12 Grade6 13Grade7 14 Grade7 12Grade8 21 Grade8 16Grade9 1 Grade8Alg1 6Grade10 84 Algebra1 7Grade11 184 Algebra2 135

Geometry 51

SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

7

40% 43% 43% 50%

56% 59%

81% 87% 86%

GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5

Cross State State District

8


36% 43% 56% 54% 55% 54% 65%

52% 4%

7%

25% 12%

34% 27% 21%

34%

Grade 3

Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations

9


34% 41% 39% 62%

31% 32% 28% 37%

9% 15%

48% 26%

62% 37%

63% 49%

Grade 4



10

38% 48% 50% 36%

63% 58% 36%

55% 5%

11% 36%

34%

31% 24% 59% 32%

Grade 5


11


40% 45% 43%

53% 59% 59%

80% 81% 77%

GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8Cross State State District


12

34% 41% 45% 31% 35% 39% 33% 40% 48%

6% 12%

35%

14% 24%

42%

10%

19%

29%

CROSS STATE

STATE DISTRICT CROSS STATE


STATE DISTRICT

GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations


13

43% 45% 37%

51% 45%

37%

79%

59% 49%

GRADE 9 GRADE 10 GRADE 11



14

33% 37% 48%

31% 31% 34% 29% 29% 21%

10% 14%

31%

14% 14% 25%

8% 8% 28%

CROSS STATE



STATE DISTRICT

GRADE 9 GRADE 10 GRADE 11Met Expectations Exceeded Expectations

SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017 COHORT ANALYSISENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy. 15

Cohort Analysis of Proficiency

2015-2016 2016-2017Grade Level Year to Year

ChangeGrade3 81% 81% =

Grade4 84% 87% +3%

Grade5 83% 86% +3%

Grade6 76% 81% +5%

Grade7 82% 81% -1%

Grade8 80% 77% -3%

Grade9 79% 79% 0

Grade10 69% 59% -10%

Grade11 60% 49% -11%

16

SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONMATHEMATICS

43% 36% 35%

53% 48% 46%

81% 80% 73%

GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5Cross State State District


17

33% 39% 52% 53% 44% 53% 56% 52%

10% 14%

29% 23% 34% 25% 33% 30%

Grade 3


18


32% 41% 64% 68% 75%

48% 57% 64% 4% 7%

16% 13% 20%

10% 21% 17%

Grade 4


19


29% 37% 50%

34% 54% 54% 54% 52% 6%

9%

23% 25%

26% 16% 32%

17%

Grade 5



20

32% 28% 26% 36%

44% 40% 28%

42%

69% 60%

49%

97%

GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8* ALGEBRA I (GR. 8)



21

27% 35% 49%

25% 34%

45%

23% 27% 48%

33% 37%

69% 78%

5% 9%

20%

3% 6%

15%

3% 1%

1%

3% 5%

8%

19%

CROSS STATE




STATE DISTRICT SCHOOL

GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8 GRADE 8 ALG. I



22

36% 32% 27%

42%

30% 27%

62% 70%

78%

ALGEBRA I (HS) GEOMETRY ALGEBRA II



23

33% 37%

69% 62%

28% 26%

52%

24% 24%

58% 3%

5%

8%

0%

4% 4%

18%

3% 3%

20%

CROSS STATE

STATE DISTRICT SHS CROSS STATE


STATE DISTRICT

ALGEBRA I GEOMETRY ALGEBRA IIMet Expectations Exceeded Expectations

SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017 COHORT ANALYSIS MATHEMATICS

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.

24

Cohort Analysis of Proficiency

2015-2016 2016-2017 YeartoYearChange

Grade3 82% 81% -1%

Grade4 73% 80% +7%

Grade5 75% 73% -2%

Grade6 67% 70% +3%

Grade7 64% 60% -4%

Grade8* 44% 49% +5%

AlgebraI.(Gr.8)* 99% 97% -2%

AlgebraI(HS) 53% 62% +9%

Geometry 69% 70% +1%

AlgebraII 60% 79% +19%

COMPARISON OF SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

PERFORMANCE LEVELS

25

2% 5% 12%

54%

27% 2% 4% 14%

56%

25%

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5

Grade 3

2016 2017

2% 3% 12%

46% 38%

1% 4% 8% 39% 48%


Grade 4

2016 2017

1% 3% 13%

49% 34%

0% 3% 10% 50%

36%


Grade 5

2016 2017


PERFORMANCE LEVELS

26

2% 5% 17%

52%

24% 2% 4% 13% 46% 35%


Grade 6

2016 2017

4% 3% 11%

40% 42%

2% 2% 15% 39% 42%


Grade 7

2016 2017

4% 2% 14%

48% 32%

4% 6% 13% 48%

29%


Grade 8

2016 2017


PERFORMANCE LEVELS

27

3% 5% 12%

46% 33%

6% 2% 13% 48%

31%


Grade 9

2016 2017

7% 8% 16%

31% 38%

14% 9% 17% 34%

25%


Grade 10

2016 2017

9% 12% 18%

41%

19% 15% 11% 25% 21% 28%


Grade 11

2016 2017

COMPARISON OF SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017MATHEMATICS

PERFORMANCE LEVELS

28

2% 4% 12%

50%

32% 1% 4% 15%

52% 29%


Grade 3

2016 2017

2% 7% 18%

60%

13% 2% 5% 12%

64%

16%


Grade 4

2016 2017

3% 8% 14%

50%

25% 3% 7% 17%

50% 23%


Grade 5

2016 2017


PERFORMANCE LEVELS

29

3% 9% 21%

53%

14% 5% 8% 17% 50%

20%


Grade 6

2016 2017

2% 8% 26%

51%

13% 2% 9% 28% 45%

15%


Grade 7

2016 2017

13% 16% 27%

44%

0% 8% 19% 24% 48%

1%


Grade 8

2016 2017

0% 0% 1%

76%

23% 0% 1% 2%

78%

19%


Grade 8 Algebra I

2016 2017


PERFORMANCE LEVELS

30

6% 11% 30%

52%

1% 4% 10% 24%

62%

0%


Algebra I

2016 2017

3% 12% 16%

49%

20% 1% 8% 21%

52%

18%


Geometry

2016 2017

9% 11% 18%

54%

8% 5% 7% 11%

59%

20%


Algebra II

2016 2017

RESOURCES FOR PARENTS

◼PARCC Resources for Parentshttp://www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parents/

◼Understanding the student score reports (with translations): understandthescore.org/

Sample report31

Documents

PARCC RESULTS: SPRING 2016 AND ... - Summit Public Schools · SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017 COHORT ANALYSIS MATHEMATICS *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I